28862011 why the sailendras are not javanese dynasty malay sumatra java
DESCRIPTION
Spurious, dated, sensationalist hagiography on the Sailendra allegedly NOT being Javanese despite the preponderance of archeological, inscribed and document evidence. Argument now entirely rebutted by post-publish archeological finds on public display Republik Indonesia Musuem History Jakarta IndonesiaAuthor uses literary approaches to argue an archeological empirical archeological fact- yet does not bother quoting source material aside from dubious third-party transliterations of source material readily accessible to the serious scholar in Jakarta National Archives and Museums.The fallacious argument is identical to: Big Ben was not built by English, as there are passing superficial resemblances to other distant cultures, then the builder had to move suddenly. So, based on the fact the builder had to suddenly move and on the basis of my expertise is Indian history- I surmise categorically Big Ben is NOT English. Let me underline my Indian-centric views, obvious bias, literary analysis of shoddy transliterations of source documents I cannot be bothered visiting in Indonesian museums universities or even a cursory look at the archeological loot in the British Museum. In being a total sophist, I aim to retire with as much of waffle for other wafflers to waffle about as to validate my lifework of hypothetical waffle. PPS. Waffle. Also known as British political-speak. NO 1984 is so not real. Doublespeak.TRANSCRIPT
