2d design quality ---- final portfolio · 2019. 10. 24. · c g 2d design concentration -- final...

Q

Name ____________________________________________________________

2D Design Quality ---- FINAL portfolio

4 Excellent

Stand 1

In most works, there is a highly successful use of the elements of design and application of 2-D design principles.

The work exhibits excellent, well-informed decision making and intention.

The composition of the works is original, imaginative, and inventive.

The work shows successful engagement with experimentation and/or risk taking in most pieces.

Stand 3

The work as a whole is confident and evocative: it engages the viewer with visual qualities.

The technical competence of the work is generally excellent; materials & media used effectively to express ideas.

Any published or photographic sources clearly provides a visual reference/inspiration & is changed considerably

and is transformed in the service of a larger, personal vision.

Although the five works may show varying levels of accomplishment, overall the work is at an excellent level.

3 Good

Stand 1

The work shows good use of the elements of design, but application of 2-D principles is not always successful.

Some clear decision making and intention are evident.

The composition of the works includes some imaginative ideas.

The work may show engagement with experimentation and/or risk taking, but with uneven success.

Stand 3

Some of the work has evocative qualities that engage the viewer, though confidence is not obvious; conversely,

the work may display confidence but not be engaging.

The work demonstrates good technical competence and use of materials and media; technical aspects and

articulation of ideas do not always work together.

Published or photographic sources clearly provide ONLY a visual reference or inspiration; the images have been

manipulated to express the student’s individual ideas. – NO copying.

Although the five works may show uneven levels of accomplishment, overall the work is at a good level.

2 Weak

Stand 1

Some awareness of the elements of design is demonstrated, but there appears to be little understanding of the

application of 2-D design principles.

Intention is not clear.

The composition of the work relies heavily on unoriginal ideas and shows few signs of invention or imagination.

The work shows little attempt at experimentation or risk taking, or the experimentation has little success.

Stand 3

There is little about the work that is engaging; the work lacks confidence.

The work generally awkward; demonstrates marginal technical competence & clumsy use of materials & media.

The work appears to be direct copies of published or photographic sources or the work of other artists; even if

they are of average rendering skill, there is little discernible student vision or individual transformation. The five works show little evidence of accomplishment, and overall the work is at a weak level.

1 Poor

Stand 1

Very little awareness of the elements of design is demonstrated, and there appears to be minimal understanding

of the application of 2-D design principles.

The work appears to be unconsidered and to lack discernible intention.

The composition of the work lacks originality or imagination.

The work shows negligible experimentation or risk taking or the experimentation is unsuccessful.

Stand 3

The work does not engage the viewer; no confidence is evident.

The work is generally inept; use of materials is naïve and is lacking skill or technical competence.

The works are obviously direct, poorly rendered copies of published or photographic sources or the work of other

artists; there is no discernible student vision or individual transformation.

Overall, the five works lack accomplishment and are at a poor level

Standard 1

Score Standard 3

Score S S T T

Experimentation

Cg

2D Design Concentration -- FINAL portfolio

4 Excellent

Stand 1

The concentration topic and the work presented are unmistakably and obviously integrated.

The investigation of the concentration topic provides shows clear informed decision-making and discovery.

The piece clearly demonstrates innovative ideas and/or risk taking.

An evocative, engaging theme is sustained through most of the work.

Stand 3

The work shows a thorough understanding and effective application of 2-D design principles.

The work conveys a sense of successful transformation and growth. The work is technically excellent; materials and media are used effectively to express ideas.

Published/photographic sources clearly provide a visual reference/inspiration that is changed considerably.

Although works may show a varying range of accomplishment, overall work is at an excellent level.

3 Good

Stand 1

The concentration topic and the work presented are closely related.

Some clear decision making and discovery are evident in the concentration piece.

The piece demonstrates some originality and some innovative thinking.

A clear theme that engages the viewer with some of the work is discernible.

Stand 3

The understanding and application of 2-D design principles is good.

Some transformation is noticeable; Some growth is evident, but work may be repetitive. The work demonstrates good technical competence and use of materials and media; technical aspects and

articulation of ideas do not always work together.

Published or photographic sources clearly provide ONLY a visual reference or inspiration; the images have been

manipulated to express the student’s individual ideas. – NO copying

Although the works may show a varying range of accomplishment, overall the work is at a good level.

2 Weak

Stand 1

The work conveys a sense of the concentration, but integration of the topic and the work is weak, confusing.

Decision making is lacking; the work appears inadequately thought out and insufficiently explored.

The piece is unoriginal or relies mostly on copying.

A potentially engaging theme is present but is largely unsuccessful.

Stand 3

The work shows a weak understanding or average application of 2-D design principles.

The work mostly repetitive; only few pieces show slight signs of transformation/growth. The work demonstrates marginal technical competence and awkward use of materials and media.

Published/photographic sources clearly provide visual reference or inspiration with very little changes made.

The images are difficult to see properly because they are too small, unfocused, or poorly lighted.

The work shows little evidence of accomplishment; overall the work is at a weak level.

1 Poor

Stand 1

There is very little or no evidence of a concentration topic in the work presented.

The work shows little or no evidence of decision making or investigation.

The piece comprises cliche or simplistic solutions that are poorly executed.

A theme that could engage the viewer with the work is absent.

Stand 3

The work shows very little or no understanding of 2-D design principles or their application.

Overall, the work shows negligible transformation or growth. The work shows very little technical competence; it is naïve and lacks skill.

The works are obviously direct copies of published or photographic sources or the work of other artists.

The images are impossible to see properly because they are too small, unfocused, or poorly lighted.

Overall the work lacks accomplishment and is at a poor level.

Standard 1

Score Standard 3

Score S S T T

Process & Progress

B

2D Design Breadth -- FINAL portfolio

4 Excellent

Stand 1

Work shows excellent application 2-D design principles to wide range of design problems–refer to back sheet

The work clearly demonstrates original vision, a variety of innovative ideas and/or risk taking.

The work clearly demonstrates a very broad range of intentions or approaches. The work as a whole is confident and evocative; it engages the viewer with visual qualities.

Stand 3

The work is technically excellent; materials and media are used effectively to express ideas.

Any published or photographic sources clearly provides a visual reference/inspiration & is changed considerably.

3 Good

Stand 1

The work shows good application of 2-D design principles - refer to back of sheet

The work demonstrates some originality, some innovative thinking, and purposeful manipulation of the

elements and principles of 2-D design.

The work shows a variety of intentions or approaches, although not all successfully articulated.

Some of the work has discernible evocative or engaging qualities, though confidence is not strongly

apparent; conversely, the work may display confidence but not be engaging.

Stand 3

The work demonstrates good technical competence and use of materials and media; technical aspects

and articulation of ideas do not always work together. Published or photographic sources clearly provides a visual reference or inspiration; the images have been

manipulated to express the student’s individual ideas.

2 Weak

Stand 1

Work shows a weak application of 2-D design principles to a very limited range of design problems-refer to

back of sheet

Ideas in the work are unoriginal; the work does not show inventive use of elements and principles of 2-D design.

The work does not clearly demonstrate a variety of intentions or approaches. There is little about the work that engages the viewer; the work does not convey much confidence.

Stand 3

The work is generally awkward; it demonstrates marginal technical competence and awkward use of materials

and media.

Published or photographic sources clearly provides a visual reference or inspiration with very little change made.

The images are difficult to see properly because they are too small, fuzzy, unfocused, or “muddy”.

1 Poor

Stand 1

The work shows little or no useful application of 2-D design principles - refer to back of sheet

There is no original or imaginative ideation in the work in regard to the elements and principles of 2-D design;

the work comprises cliché or simplistic solutions.

The work does not demonstrate a variety of intentions or approaches.

The work does not engage the viewer and does not convey a sense of confidence.

Stand 3

The work is generally inept; use of materials and media is naïve and lacks skill or technical competence.

The works are obviously direct copies of published or photographic sources or the work of other artists.

The images are impossible to see properly because they are too small, unfocused, or poorly lighted.

Standard 1

Score Standard 3

Score S S T T

Variety

Pieces display obvious use of:

Neg/Pos Space - Figure/Ground Relationship

Variety

Rhythm-moving pattern

Contrast - differences

Unity

Emphasis-rule of thirds, framing, focal point, primary, secondary, dominance

Balance-symmetry, radial, or asymmetry

Movement-guide the eye around piece, leading lines, etc.

Color Relationships – complementary, analogous, monochromatic, etc.

Scale – size relationships

Other _____________________________________

Other _____________________________________

Mis

c. R

ubri

cs: F

inal

Por

tfolio

N

ame

____

____

____

___

Dat

e

Scor

ing

Ele

men

ts

Not

Yet

A

ppro

achi

ng E

xpec

tatio

ns

Mee

ts E

xpec

tatio

ns

Adv

ance

d

Exh

ibit

Wor

ks o

f Art

Qua

lity

1. 5

pie

ces c

ropp

ed a

ccur

atel

y –

stra

ight

, no

back

grou

nd, e

tc.

2

. 5 p

iece

s lab

eled

cor

rect

ly b

ased

on

inst

ruct

ion

shee

t

3. 5

pie

ces s

aved

in c

orre

ct fo

lder

..t

here

is w

eakn

ess m

any

par

ts

such

as o

ne n

ot c

ropp

ed st

raig

ht

and

one

slig

htly

out

of f

ocus

an

d on

e no

t mat

ted

neat

ly a

nd

man

y no

t sav

ed c

orre

ctly

Th

ere

is w

eakn

ess s

ever

al p

arts

, su

ch a

s one

not

cro

pped

stra

ight

an

d on

e sl

ight

ly o

ut o

f foc

us

and

one

not m

atte

d ne

atly

B

ut th

ere

is a

wea

knes

s 1 o

r 2

such

as o

ne n

ot c

ropp

ed st

raig

ht

or o

ne sl

ight

ly o

ut o

f foc

us

Th

ere

is n

o w

eakn

ess i

n an

y,

no

chan

ges n

eede

d.

Exh

ibit

Wor

ks o

f Art

Bre

adth

1. 1

2 pi

eces

cro

pped

acc

urat

ely –

stra

ight

, no

back

grou

nd, e

tc.

2

. 12

piec

es la

bele

d co

rrec

tly b

ased

on

inst

ruct

ion

shee

t

3. 1

2 pi

eces

save

d in

cor

rect

fold

er

..t

here

is w

eakn

ess m

any

par

ts

such

as o

ne n

ot c

ropp

ed st

raig

ht

and

one

slig

htly

out

of f

ocus

an

d on

e no

t mat

ted

neat

ly a

nd

man

y no

t sav

ed c

orre

ctly

Th

ere

is w

eakn

ess s

ever

al p

arts

, su

ch a

s one

not

cro

pped

stra

ight

an

d on

e sl

ight

ly o

ut o

f foc

us

and

one

not m

atte

d ne

atly

B

ut th

ere

is a

wea

knes

s 1 o

r 2

such

as o

ne n

ot c

ropp

ed st

raig

ht

or o

ne sl

ight

ly o

ut o

f foc

us

Th

ere

is n

o w

eakn

ess i

n an

y –

no c

hang

es n

eede

d.

Exh

ibit

Wor

ks o

f Art

Con

cent

ratio

n

1. 1

2 pi

eces

cro

pped

acc

urat

ely –

stra

ight

, no

back

grou

nd, e

tc.

2

. 12

piec

es la

bele

d co

rrec

tly b

ased

on

inst

ruct

ion

shee

t

3. 1

2 pi

eces

save

d in

cor

rect

fold

er

..t

here

is w

eakn

ess m

any

par

ts

such

as o

ne n

ot c

ropp

ed st

raig

ht

and

one

slig

htly

out

of f

ocus

an

d on

e no

t mat

ted

neat

ly a

nd

man

y no

t sav

ed c

orre

ctly

Th

ere

is w

eakn

ess s

ever

al p

arts

, su

ch a

s one

not

cro

pped

stra

ight

an

d on

e sl

ight

ly o

ut o

f foc

us

and

one

not m

atte

d ne

atly

B

ut th

ere

is a

wea

knes

s 1

or 2

su

ch a

s one

not

cro

pped

stra

ight

or

one

slig

htly

out

of f

ocus

Th

ere

is n

o w

eakn

ess i

n an

y –

no c

hang

es n

eede

d.

Scor

ing

Ele

men

ts

Not

Yet

A

ppro

achi

ng E

xpec

tatio

ns

Mee

ts E

xpec

tatio

ns

Adv

ance

d

C

once

ntra

tion

Com

men

tary

O

ne q

uest

ion

not

answ

ered

Ove

r cha

ract

er c

ount

Not

subm

itted

cor

rect

ly

Save

d an

d pr

inte

d

Ver

y po

orly

writ

ten

1

. Q #

1: T

hesi

s not

cle

arly

st

ated

– n

o re

phra

se

2

. Q #

1: T

hesi

s doe

s not

seem

to

rela

te to

the

12 p

iece

s

3. Q

#2:

Wea

kly

answ

ered

qu

estio

n –

no re

phra

sing

4. Q

#2:

Ref

er to

1-2

pie

ces a

s ev

iden

ce w

ith o

r with

out

imag

e nu

mbe

rs

5

. Q #

2: U

sed

1-2

obvi

ous a

rt-re

late

d vo

cabu

lary

cor

rect

ly

6

. Q #

2: O

rder

of p

iece

s doe

s no

t rea

lly m

atch

ans

wer

or

seem

s ver

y aw

kwar

d

7

. Bot

h: c

orre

ct sp

ellin

g,

gram

mar

– fe

w c

lear

mis

take

s

1

. Q #

1: T

hesi

s cle

arly

stat

ed

reph

rasi

ng q

uest

ion

2. Q

#1:

The

sis m

atch

es a

ll 12

pi

eces

wel

l

3. Q

#2:

Cle

arly

ans

wer

ed

ques

tion –

reph

rasi

ng

4

. Q #

2: R

efer

to 3

pie

ces a

s ev

iden

ce w

ith im

age

num

bers

5. Q

#2:

Use

d 3

obvi

ous a

rt-re

late

d vo

cabu

lary

cor

rect

ly

6

. Q #

2: O

rder

of p

iece

s mat

ch

answ

er w

ell

7. B

oth:

cor

rect

spel

ling

and

gram

mar

– o

nly

1-2

mis

take

s

1

. Q #

1: T

hesi

s cle

arly

stat

ed

with

1-2

det

ail –

reph

rase

d

2. Q

#1:

The

sis m

atch

es a

ll 12

pi

eces

ver

y w

ell –

coh

esiv

e

3. Q

#2:

Cle

arly

ans

wer

ed

ques

tion –

reph

rasi

ng

4

. Q #

2: R

efer

to 4

+ pi

eces

as

evid

ence

with

imag

e nu

mbe

rs

5

. Q #

2: U

sed

4+ o

bvio

us a

rt-re

late

d vo

cabu

lary

cor

rect

ly

6

. Q #

2: O

rder

of p

iece

s mat

ch

answ

er v

ery

wel

l - d

escr

ibe

grow

th a

nd tr

ansf

orm

atio

n

7. B

oth:

cor

rect

spel

ling

and

gram

mar

– n

o ob

viou

s m

ista

kes

2D Design Image Information

Quality

#1: Describe: _________________Size: ________________, Media: ____________________





Concentration – can include 2-3 images of process prints with notes, etc.










#10: Describe: _________________Size: ________________, Media: ___________________



Media sample

1 = “digital photograph” (no adjust)

“digital image” (adjusted)

2 = “colored pencil, graphite”

3 = “mixed media”

Measure

Nearest 1/2”

Height x Width Subject Matter

Breadth













Media sample

1 = “digital photograph” (no adjust)

“digital image” (adjusted)

2 = “colored pencil, graphite”

3 = “mixed media”

Measure

Nearest 1/2”

Height x Width Subject Matter

2d design quality ---- final portfolio · 2019. 10. 24. · c g 2d design concentration -- final...

Documents