첨부#2_report for allowable settlement criteria

Upload: hiyeon

Post on 03-Apr-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    1/22

    HOU Project

    REPORT

    FOR

    ALLOWABEL SETTLEMENT CRITERIA

    Doc. No. : D7S38-00-003

    Rev. No. : A

    Page : 1 of 15

    Date : 18th

    March, 2005

    REPORTfor

    ALLOWABLE SETTLEMENT CRITERIA

    DOC. NO. : D7S38-00-003

    JOB NO. : 7S38

    PROJECT NAME : HOU Project

    CLIENT : LG Caltex Oil Corp.

    SITE : Yeosu, Korea

    A 18/03/05 Issued for review H.I.Y K.B.C B.Y.J

    REV. DATE DESCRIPTION PREPD CHKD APPD CLIENT

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    2/22

    HOU Project

    REPORT

    FOR

    ALLOWABEL SETTLEMENT CRITERIA

    Doc. No. : D7S38-00-003

    Rev. No. : A

    Page : 2 of 15

    Date : 18th

    March, 2005

    1.1.1.1.

    Industrial Plant

    ,

    .

    2.2.2.2.

    , Industrial Plant

    /,

    .

    3.3.3.3.

    1)

    ,

    () ,

    (Serviceability) .

    (Immediate Settlement)

    (Consolidation Settlement) .

    +

    Wind Temporary Load .

    +

    .

    o ((((Uniform SettlementUniform SettlementUniform SettlementUniform Settlement))))

    ,

    .

    , (the Palacio de

    Bellas Artes) l909

    3.5m .

    uniform

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    3/22

    HOU Project

    REPORT

    FOR

    ALLOWABEL SETTLEMENT CRITERIA

    Doc. No. : D7S38-00-003

    Rev. No. : A

    Page : 3 of 15

    Date : 18th

    March, 2005

    ,

    , , Utility Service .

    o Tilting SettlementTilting SettlementTilting SettlementTilting Settlement

    Angular distortion

    = / L

    = (max - min) / L

    L = distance adjacent columns/supports.

    Possible problems are tilting into adjacent

    building, aesthetic - eye very sensitive to

    tilting (1:100), rolling, tilting of bridge piers.

    Tilting may also overload foundation

    causing a BCfailure.

    o ((((Differential SettlementDifferential SettlementDifferential SettlementDifferential Settlement))))

    = MAX - MIN

    Angular distortion = / L

    = (MAX - MIN) / L

    .

    maxmin

    caused by

    weight of fill

    minminminminmaxmaxmaxmax

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    4/22

    HOU Project

    REPORT

    FOR

    ALLOWABEL SETTLEMENT CRITERIA

    Doc. No. : D7S38-00-003

    Rev. No. : A

    Page : 4 of 15

    Date : 18th

    March, 2005

    (flexible structure) ,

    , (Footing Rigidity) .

    2)

    .

    SR= S1+S2

    , SR :

    S1:

    S2:

    SR= S3-USp

    , SR :

    S3:

    U:

    S2: Surcharge/Preload

    .

    .

    .

    ,

    CLAYCLAYCLAYCLAY SANDSANDSANDSANDcrushing

    flexural crackshigh @ center

    flexural cracks

    higher at edgehigh , E@center

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    5/22

    HOU Project

    REPORT

    FOR

    ALLOWABEL SETTLEMENT CRITERIA

    Doc. No. : D7S38-00-003

    Rev. No. : A

    Page : 5 of 15

    Date : 18th

    March, 2005

    , , .

    3)

    , Pile

    .

    .

    (spool piece) Coupling .

    .

    .

    [Pipe Sleeper Pipeline Gap Plate ]

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    6/22

    HOU Project

    REPORT

    FOR

    ALLOWABEL SETTLEMENT CRITERIA

    Doc. No. : D7S38-00-003

    Rev. No. : A

    Page : 6 of 15

    Date : 18th

    March, 2005

    [ Dike Local Support ]

    [ Jack-up ]

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    7/22

    HOU Project

    REPORT

    FOR

    ALLOWABEL SETTLEMENT CRITERIA

    Doc. No. : D7S38-00-003

    Rev. No. : A

    Page : 7 of 15

    Date : 18th

    March, 2005

    [Trench Gap ]

    [Pump Pump station paving]

    4.4.4.4. PLANTPLANTPLANTPLANT

    Project #1 , Process

    Plant Project Specification #2 .

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    8/22

    HOU Project

    REPORT

    FOR

    ALLOWABEL SETTLEMENT CRITERIA

    Doc. No. : D7S38-00-003

    Rev. No. : A

    Page : 8 of 15

    Date : 18th

    March, 2005

    5.5.5.5.

    1 inch (25.4mm)

    . magic number

    .

    .

    1)

    .

    () . Crack

    ( #3 ),

    , .

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    9/22

    HOU Project

    REPORT

    FOR

    ALLOWABEL SETTLEMENT CRITERIA

    Doc. No. : D7S38-00-003

    Rev. No. : A

    Page : 9 of 15

    Date : 18th

    March, 2005

    Limiting Factors Maximum Differential Settlement

    High continuous

    brick walls0.0005L to 0.0010L

    One story brick buildings, wall

    cracking0.001L to 0.020L

    Plaster cracking 0.001L

    Reinforced concrete frame 0.0025L to 0.0040L

    Reinforced concrete curtain

    walls0.003L

    Steel frame, continuous 0.002L

    Simple steel frame 0.005L

    from Sowers (1962)

    2)

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    10/22

    HOU Project

    REPORT

    FOR

    ALLOWABEL SETTLEMENT CRITERIA

    Doc. No. : D7S38-00-003

    Rev. No. : A

    Page : 10 of 15

    Date : 18th

    March, 2005

    3)

    (Sowers(Sowers(Sowers(Sowers))))

    15.0 30.0 30.0 60.0 , () 2.5 5.0 5.0 10.0

    , , 7.5 30.0 , 0.004 S 0.01 S 0.003 S 0.0005 0.002 S 0.003 S () 0.002 S ()

    0.005 S

    )))) S :

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    11/22

    HOU Project

    REPORT

    FOR

    ALLOWABEL SETTLEMENT CRITERIA

    Doc. No. : D7S38-00-003

    Rev. No. : A

    Page : 11 of 15

    Date : 18th

    March, 2005

    Tolerable settlement for Building

    4) Tank

    STEEL TANK Flexible structure

    .

    API 650 TANK EARTH FOUNDATION

    , EARTH

    FOUNDATION TANK SHELL BOTTOM PLATE , ANNULAR PLATE

    CRUSHED STONE RINGWALL ,

    Pile

    HOU Tank Pile

    . Tank #1

    .

    Tank #4 ,

    .

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    12/22

    HOU Project

    REPORT

    FOR

    ALLOWABEL SETTLEMENT CRITERIA

    Doc. No. : D7S38-00-003

    Rev. No. : A

    Page : 12 of 15

    Date : 18th

    March, 2005

    Settlement Criteria

    API 653 Appendix BSettlement

    Pattern

    Langeveld Greenwood

    50 cmPlanar Tilt

    hor 30 cm

    D/200

    for aesthetics

    D/300

    Non-Planar

    SettlementS(0.2L2/HD)Rtol

    For D50m, Smax 6 cm-

    [Tank Raised for Foundation Work]

    5)

    Tank Vessel Equipment

    ( )

    , (bellows,

    expansion joints, and other flexible apparatus) .

    Guideline .

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    13/22

    HOU Project

    REPORT

    FOR

    ALLOWABEL SETTLEMENT CRITERIA

    Doc. No. : D7S38-00-003

    Rev. No. : A

    Page : 13 of 15

    Date : 18th

    March, 2005

    1 Minimum Design Displacements for Piping Attachments

    Condition Displacement (in.)

    Mechanically-anchored tanks and vessels:

    Upward vertical displacement relative to support or foundation

    Downward vertical displacement relative to support or foundation

    Range of displacement (radial and tangential) relative to support or foundation:

    1

    0.5

    0.5

    Self-anchored tanks and vessels (at grade):

    Upward vertical displacement relative to support or foundation

    If designed in accordance with an adopted reference.

    Anchorage ratio less than or equal to 0.785 (indicates no uplift):

    Anchorage ratio greater than 0.785 (indicates uplift):

    If designed for seismic loads in accordance with theseProvisionsbut not

    covered by an adopted reference:

    For tanks and vessels with a diameter less than 40 ft:

    For tanks and vessels with a diameter equal to or greater than 40 ft:

    Downward vertical displacement relative to support of foundation

    For tanks with a ringwall/mat foundation:

    For tanks with a berm foundation:

    Range of horizontal displacement (radial and tangential) relative to support

    or foundation

    1

    4

    8

    12

    0.5

    1

    2

    From 2003 NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations

    for New Buildings and Other Structures and Accompanying Commentary

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    14/22

    HOU Project

    REPORT

    FOR

    ALLOWABEL SETTLEMENT CRITERIA

    Doc. No. : D7S38-00-003

    Rev. No. : A

    Page : 14 of 15

    Date : 18th

    March, 2005

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    15/22

    HOU Project

    REPORT

    FOR

    ALLOWABEL SETTLEMENT CRITERIA

    Doc. No. : D7S38-00-003

    Rev. No. : A

    Page : 15 of 15

    Date : 18th

    March, 2005

    6.6.6.6.

    Issue

    Design Specification for Ground Improvement .

    (Foundation)

    ( ), ( 10mm) .

    ,

    .

    .

    . ,

    .

    ,

    .

    , , ,

    Project #5 .

    NODCO Project Maximum Allowable

    Settlement Criteria #6 .

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    16/22

    [ # 1]

    (TANK) (TANK) (TANK) (TANK)

    1. 1. 1. 1.

    PROJECT TANK SIZE

    350,000 MTA ETHYLENE COMPLEX LG 1989.10~1991.7 MAX = 27m

    LG 3AA PROJECT LG 1995.11~1996.10 MAX = 15m

    POLYCARBONATE PLANT LG DOW POLYCARBONATE 1999.11~2001.03 MAX = 20m

    YM-2 PROJECT LG MMA 2001.09~2003.02 MAX = 15m

    PHENOL/BPA PROJECT LG 2003.12~2005.02 MAX = 16m

    2. HOU 2. HOU 2. HOU 2. HOU

    PROJECT TANK SIZE

    K2 PROJECT 1994.02~1995.05 MAX = 25m

    K3 PROJECT 1996.05~1997.08 MAX = 25m

    K4 PROJECT 2001.10~2003.03 MAX = 28m* NOTE :

    U/G SUPPORT PILE

    * NOTE: 2 (1993~1997,PAPER DRAIN +

    PROJECT DIKE, DITCH, U/G SUPPORT PILE

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    17/22

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    18/22

    [ #3]

    Damage

    Category

    (1)

    Description of typical damage

    (2)

    Negligible Hairline cracks < 0.1 mm < 3 cm < 1/300

    Very Slight

    Very slight damage includes fine cracks

    that can be easily treated during normal

    decoration, perhaps an isolated slight

    fracture in building, and cracks in external

    brickwork visible on close inspection

    1 mm 3 cm ~ 4 cm 1/300 to 1/240

    Slight

    Slight damage includes cracks that can

    be easily filled and redecoration would

    probably be required; several slight

    fractures

    may appear showing on the inside of the

    building; cracks that are visible externally

    and some repointing may be required;

    doors and windows may stick

    3 mm 4 cm ~ 5 cm 1/240 to 1/175

    5 mm to 15 mm 5 cm ~ 8 cm 1/175 to 1/120

    or a

    number

    of craks

    > 3 mm

    15 mm to 25 mm 8 cm ~ 13 cm 1/120 to 1/70

    but also

    depends on

    number of

    craks

    Usually

    >5 mm > 13 cm > 1/70

    but also

    depends on

    number of

    craks

    Notes

    1 . : Maximum differential settlement of the foundation

    2. /L : Maximum angular distortion of the foundation

    Very severe

    Very severe damage often requires a major

    repair job involving partial or complete

    rebuilding; beams lose bearing; walls lean

    and require shoring; windows are broken

    with distortion; there is danger of structural

    instability

    Moderate

    Moderate damage includes cracks that

    require some opening up and can be

    patched by a mason; recurrent cracks thatcan be masked by suitable linings;

    repointing of external brickwork and

    possibly a small amount of brickwork

    replacement may be required; doors and

    windows stick; service pipes may fracture;

    weathertightness is often impaired

    Severe

    Severe damage includes large cracks

    requiring extensive repair work involving

    breaking out and replacing sections of

    wall (especially over doors and windows);

    distorted windows and door frames;

    noticeably sloping floors; leaning or

    bulging

    walls; some loss of bearing in beams;

    disrupted service pipes

    Approx. crack width

    (3)

    (4)

    /L

    (5)

    Severity of Cracking DamageFrom Robert W. Day,

    "Geotechnical and Foundation Engineering : Design and Construction(1999)"

    L

    ma

    x.

    Original level of footings

    Building

    Bay with maximum /L

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    19/22

    #4 Tank Settlement CriteriaAPI 653 Appendix B Chevron

    Criteria for Settlement of Tanks

    From Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, Proceedings of

    the American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 108, August 1982

    Recommended Performance Criteria for Differential Settlement of

    Tanks

    Allowable Tank Bottom Differential Settlement

    1) For New Tanks with Floating roofs

    2) For New Tanks with Fixed roofs

    D

    ss

    ++=

    4

    461.0

    2

    where:

    = Allowable differential settlement edge to center of tank, in.

    D = Tank diameter, ft:

    S = Intial bottom slope (positive when coned up), in/ft

    Most soils-related damage to tanks is due to differential settlement.

    Tank

    As a

    substa

    distrib

    After

    opera

    measu

    highe

    Durin

    settlem

    take

    opera

    Settle

    settlem

    MON

    Espec

    by mo

    2

    6

    t

    3Durin

    maxim

    than

    opera

    three

    d

    d

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    20/22

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    21/22

    [ #5] Recommended Allowable Settlement Cri

    I. FOUNDATIONS

    FOUNDATION TYPE TOTAL SETTLEMENT DIFFERENTI

    (Angul

    Foundation for central control building, substation, storage

    building and shelter with overhead crane

    25mm 19m

    Mat foundation 25mm 19m

    Underground reservoir and cooling tower 25mm 19m

    Foundation for static equipment, piperack and stl structures 25mm 19m

    Foundation for pumps, blowers 25mm 10m

    Foundation for compressor 13mm 10m

    Foundation for spheres 13mm 10m

    Foundation for tanks ( Tank Diameter 15m) 75mm

    Foundation for tanks (> Tank Diameter 15m) 75mm (1/300 of

  • 7/29/2019 #2_Report for Allowable Settlement Criteria

    22/22

    [ #6]

    Maximum Allowable Settlement Criteria

    PROJECT NAME : NODCO REFINERTY EXPANSION PROJECTPROJECT NAME : NODCO REFINERTY EXPANSION PROJECTPROJECT NAME : NODCO REFINERTY EXPANSION PROJECTPROJECT NAME : NODCO REFINERTY EXPANSION PROJECT

    CLIENT : NATIONAL OIL DISTRIBUTION COMPANYCLIENT : NATIONAL OIL DISTRIBUTION COMPANYCLIENT : NATIONAL OIL DISTRIBUTION COMPANYCLIENT : NATIONAL OIL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY

    SITE : MESAIEED, STATE OF QATAR

    Foundation for central control building, substation, storage building - 25mm

    and shed with overhead crane.

    Raft foundation - 25mm

    Underground reservoir and cooling tower - 25mm

    Foundation for static equipment, piperack and stl structures - 25mm

    Foundation for pumps, blowers - 25mm

    Foundation for compressor - 13mm

    Foundation for spheres - 13mm

    Foundation for tanks - 60mm