3. an 'urban myth' of the illegal discharge in chemical creek

Upload: paritutuiwd

Post on 02-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 3. An 'Urban Myth' of the Illegal Discharge in Chemical Creek

    1/11

    PARITUTU CENTENIAL PARK BEFORE IVON WATKINS DOW ARRIVED - AND IWD IN 1968 - BELOW

    THE TARANAKI REGIONAL COUNCILS REPORT ON RISKS IN 2001 FROM HISTORIC AGRICHEMICAL

    WASTE DISPOSAL NOTED THAT FROM 1967 THE TRC PREDECESSOR THE TARANAKI CATCHMENT

    COMMISSION HAD BEEN RESPONSIBLE FOR DISCHARGES TO WATER. THE REPORT DESCRIBED THE

    PARITUTU DISCHARGE AS THE IWD OFFICE BLOCK STORM WATER OUTFALL [WITH OCCASSIONAL

    CHEMICAL SPILLS] THE REPORT RE-ASSURED RECENT RESIDENTS THERE WAS NO RISK. HOW-EVER

    THE ISSUES ORIGINALLY RAISED WERE OVER HEALTH EFFECTS FROM EXPOSURES 3 TO 4 DECADES

    AGO FROM DAILY DISCHARGES OF HUNDREDS OF TONNES OF CHEMICAL WASTES ONTO A PUBLICBEACH AND INTO THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT WHERE THE HECTORS DOLPHIN HAD DISAPPEARED.

  • 7/27/2019 3. An 'Urban Myth' of the Illegal Discharge in Chemical Creek

    2/11

  • 7/27/2019 3. An 'Urban Myth' of the Illegal Discharge in Chemical Creek

    3/11

  • 7/27/2019 3. An 'Urban Myth' of the Illegal Discharge in Chemical Creek

    4/11

  • 7/27/2019 3. An 'Urban Myth' of the Illegal Discharge in Chemical Creek

    5/11

  • 7/27/2019 3. An 'Urban Myth' of the Illegal Discharge in Chemical Creek

    6/11

  • 7/27/2019 3. An 'Urban Myth' of the Illegal Discharge in Chemical Creek

    7/11

  • 7/27/2019 3. An 'Urban Myth' of the Illegal Discharge in Chemical Creek

    8/11

  • 7/27/2019 3. An 'Urban Myth' of the Illegal Discharge in Chemical Creek

    9/11

    COOLING WATER WAS DISCHARGED TO WASTE AFTER DIOXIN CONTAMINATED TCP WAS REACTED

    TO PRODUCE 2,4,5-T. THE PROCESS WAS DESCRIBED IN A JULY 1986 HEALTH DEPARTMENT REPORT.

    UNTREATED LIQUID WASTES WERE ALSO GENERATED BY 2,4-D AND TRIAZINE MANUFACTURE

  • 7/27/2019 3. An 'Urban Myth' of the Illegal Discharge in Chemical Creek

    10/11

    A 1972 COUNCIL MEMO NOTES THE COOLING WATER DISCHARGE WAS APPROX. 300,000 A DAY

    AND THAT COUNCIL COULD LEGALLY DISCHARGE STORMWATER BUT NOT THE COOLING WATER .

  • 7/27/2019 3. An 'Urban Myth' of the Illegal Discharge in Chemical Creek

    11/11

    AFTER THE REGIONAL COUNCIL DISMISSED HISTORIC EXPOSURE RISKS IN 2000 AND 2001 USING

    RESIDUE TESTS FROM 2000 AND 2001 - IN 2007 ANOTHER ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO GAIN SOME

    RECOGNITION OF HISTORIC EXPOSURES THE TRC RESPONSE WAS TO TEST TWO GURNARD FISH.