3.1 global supply chain agile models improvement ... · pdf fileimprovement opportunities for...
TRANSCRIPT
3.1 Global Supply Chain – Agile Models
Improvement opportunities for supply chains of
Australian FMCG companies
Peter Griffiths Partner
KPMG
Introduction
Supply chain collaboration
New customer engagement models
Alternative retail distribution and fulfilment models
Peter Griffiths, Partner, KPMG 2
Traditional supply chain models are challenged by having all parties work with linear planning and replenishment processes
Traditional Approach with Information Latency and Demand Distortion
Batch Systems Siloed Supply
Chain
Skewed Demand
Signals
MFG DCs T1 Suppliers T2 Suppliers
1 Day/Hours
3 Days
Stores
Consumers
3 Days 3 Days 3 Days 3 Days
Factories
Information Lead Time & Flow Legend: Material Lead Time & Flow
DCs
7 Days 7 Days 7 Days 7 Days
Peter Griffiths, Partner, KPMG
Demand driven supply chains and the use of cloud platforms allow all participants to work as one virtual organisation as part of a common network
End to End Lead Time and Flow*
Approach Material Information
Traditional 15 days 29 days
Demand Driven 15 days 1 day
Peter Griffiths, Partner, KPMG
All participants connected in a network model with real time visibility of demand
Factories
DCs
Stores
MFG DCs
T1 Suppliers Consumers
T2 Suppliers
3 D
ays
3 Days
* Example scenario with each entity having a weekly planning process
Information Lead Time & Flow Legend:
Material Lead Time & Flow
Companies operate in a networked
fashion
Demand signal is synchronised
across all companies
Elimination of information latency
Real time visibility of changes in
demand and supply
4
A demand driven approach achieves balanced cash flow through increased sales, reduced operating expenses, and working capital improvements
Lift from out of stock and forecast accuracy improvements resulting in recoverable sales
† Buffer = Safety stock adjustment for uncertainty/ information latency
Sales
1% – 4% Improvement
in sales
Sales*
Traditional Model
Demand Driven
Sales Levels
CoGS
Planning
Transportation
5% – 10% Reduction in operating expense
CoGS
Planning
Transportation
Traditional Model
Demand Driven
Expense Levels
Forecasted Demand
Promotional Demand
Buffer†
20% – 30% Reduction in
Inventory
Actual Demand
Promotional Demand
Buffer†
Traditional Model
Demand Driven
Inventory Levels
5 Peter Griffiths, Partner, KPMG
Peter Griffiths, Partner, KPMG
Upstream and downstream benefits of collaboration in supply chains
U
pst
ream
Do
wn
stream
Reduced inventory holdings Lower cost of ownership Improved asset utilisation Optimised distribution Improved supply chain
responsiveness
Improved customer service Lower cost to serve Quicker time to market Lower store inventories Improved responsiveness
6
Collaboration Arrangement
Joint Business
Plan
Sales Forecasting
Order Planning /
Forecasting
Order Generation
Order Fulfilment
Exception Management
Performance Assessment
Consumer
Introduction
Supply chain collaboration
New customer engagement models
Alternative retail distribution and fulfilment models
Peter Griffiths, Partner, KPMG 7
Imperative for the Australian Retail Industry to embrace a demand driven supply chain
3.4%
CAGRFY08-12
4.0%
6.8%
1.3%
(0.1)%
0.8%
1.3%
7.0%
4.5%
72.4 78.0 79.9 82.9 86.5
42.142.5 42.9 43.2 43.4
18.418.8 18.6 18.2 18.318.319.5 19.3 18.8 19.326.329.0 31.8 32.2 34.331.332.5 33.6 35.6
36.6224.3236.9 242.6 248.5
256.6
0
75
150
225
300
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
$m
illion
Supermarkets Liquor Specialty food
Household goods Department Stores Clothing & Soft Goods
Hospitality Other Retailing
Strong Australian economy putting pressure on performance
Increasing costs and competition for Australian retailers in the marketplace
Despite pressures, revenue around $257 billion
3.4% growth since GFC
Peter Griffiths, Partner, KPMG 8
“Bricks and Mortar retailers
can outperform Online
Retailers – they have the
advantage of providing a
customer experiences both
online and in store” Source: Robin Lewis, The Robin Report
The buying experience must be
seamless from end to end:
• In store;
• Online;
• Delivery and returns; and
• Payment process.
@
DC
Flagship Store
Flagship Store
Store 1 Store 2 Store 3 Store 4
Option 1 – Order online, deliver from DC Option 2 – Order online, customer pick-up from store Option 3 – Order online, deliver from flagship store Option 4 – Order online, deliver from local store
Buy anywhere, Fulfil anywhere, Return anywhere Desired customer experience with cross-channel fulfilment
9 Peter Griffiths, Partner, KPMG
What is omni-channel?
10 Peter Griffiths, Partner, KPMG
Store Online
Multi-channel
Store Online
Omni-channel
“Separate strategies to
maximise customer sales
in each channel”
“Integrated strategies to
maximise customer
experience with the
brand”
Enablers of omni-channel retailing
Peter Griffiths, Partner, KPMG
Customer
Merchandising & Content
Business Administration
Fulfilment & Logistics
Channel Operations
Cross-Channel Integration
Omni-Channel Operational
Areas
IT & Operations Marketing &
Customer Management
“Web”
“Call Centre”
“Store POS & Kiosks”
“Mobile”
“Social Media”
11
As retailers offerings become more mature their omni-channel strategy needs to evolve
Peter Griffiths, Partner, KPMG
Stage 2
Align
Fundamentals
Sync your basic
value propositions
Stage 3
Achieve
Proficiency
Focus on customer
facing processes
and adept in
foundational
activities
Stage 1
Create
Presence
Get new
channels up
and running
Stage 5
Optimise
Operating
Model
Established
repeatable
processes and
optimisation of
resources at
organisational level
Drive cross-channel
collaboration and
capabilities
Stage 4
Leverage
Across
Channels
12
Introduction
Supply chain collaboration
New customer engagement models
Alternative retail distribution and fulfilment models
Peter Griffiths, Partner, KPMG 13
Peter Griffiths, Partner, KPMG
Opportunities exist for retailers to enhance competition with e-retailers by transforming their online fulfilment models
Hardstand Distribution Model
National Distribution Centre
Domestic Online Distribution Model
National Distribution Centre
@
Opportunities exist for retailers to better manage their product distribution both domestically and from origin/source overseas
Traditional distribution channels used by Australian ‘bricks and mortar’ retailers in online operations
There is an opportunity for retailers to augment existing models with a flexible, seamless, lower cost distribution model from source
A streamlined distribution model for online retailers
Cam
bo
dia
Ch
ina
Ban
glad
esh
Lao
s
Oth
ers…
Ind
ia
Apparel
Footwear
Electronics
Toys
Sporting Goods
Books
others…
Offshore consumer goods manufacturing and/or hubs
International Online Direct Distribution Model
International Distribution Centre
@
Trad
itio
nal
St
ream
line
d
14
Alternative fulfilment models will best deliver on the customer service promise
Peter Griffiths, Partner, KPMG
Click &
Collect
Central
location
collection
Home
Delivery
Cu
sto
mer
serv
ice m
od
el
Online fulfiment options
In-store
picking “DNC”
International online direct
Fulfilment model
Higher cost
to serve
Lower cost
to serve
1. Distribution fulfiment (In-store picking) 2. Distributed Network Collection (“DNC”) 3. International online direct
• Orders are picked off the shelf of a standard operating retail store
• Generally used where population density is low
• Trade-off between fulfilment timelines and in-store customer service delivery
• Wherever picked, orders are shipped to and held at a network of collection points
• Collection points operated by the retailer through an alliance partne or via a third party, which aggregates multiple partners acting as collection points
• The most common variants of this model are ‘buy online, pick up in-store’ and ‘click & collect’
• Can assist in driving incremental purchases i.e. Pick up from store and purchase again
• Streamlined distribution model focussing minimal ‘touch points’ to reduce costs
• Creates production run flexibility and reduced inventory holdings at source/overseas hubs
• Enables low cost test run for new products before significant investment in stock in store
• Enables faster turns and increased newness in range
• Enables broader range and selection and limited offers
VS VS
ILLUSTRATIVE
Adopting a model to meet the changing consumer needs whilst minimising overall cost to serve will be key to future success…
15
Peter Griffiths, Partner, KPMG
Centralised
fulfilment
Supplier
Drop Ship
Distribution
fulfilment
Distribution
Network
Collection
Flexible
fulfilment
Pick & pack from centralised location
Pick & pack from stores
Original online fulfilment model
initiated by UK retailer Tesco
Orders shipped to and held at a
network of collection points regardless
of pick & pack location
Orders passed directly to supplier who
ships from a central stock location
direct to the customer
Inventory from all stores and
warehouses becomes available both
in-store and online
Warehousing, transportation, pick and
pack, order management and other
services are outsourced to a specialist
third party logistics provider
Outsourced
fulfilment
(3PL providers)
Simple, with inventory and operations
all in one place
Suits retailers with large store
networks with heavy and relatively
inexpensive products, such as grocery
Simple model including ‘buy online,
pick up in-store’ and ‘click and collect’
Drives incremental purchases i.e. Pick
up from store and purchase again
No overheads / storage costs
Suits retailers with extended range,
non-stocked items, big and bulky or
specialised merchandise
Erases lost sales stemming from
inventory being out of stock online but
available in-store
Transport costs often better than
available directly
No economic cost-cycle vulnerability or
staffing challenges
Not built for scale
Based on existing infrastructure
Can be expensive
Maintaining accurate inventory at store
level and forecasting two sets of
demand is difficult
Some convenience for consumer
compromised as still required to go to
store
Managing order allocation and
inventory availability is difficult
Often forced transport costs
Stock availability vulnerability
Requires ‘integrated’ real time
inventory management systems
Often forced transport costs
Varying degrees of technology
proliferation and transparency
Fulfilment model Description Benefits Weaknesses
16
What will these alternative fulfilment models deliver?
Peter Griffiths, Partner, KPMG
Operational blueprint in support of omni-channel strategy
Operational
Blueprint
Assess current capabilities and
infrastructure;
Develop and prioritise future
state; and
Determine capability gaps and
change strategy.
Execution
Roadmap &
Business Case
Define options and enabling projects;
Develop Business Case; and
Develop Implementation Roadmap.
Benchmarking and comparator
analysis;
Understand customers needs and
expectations;
Engage stakeholders and understand
expectations;
Define value proposition and strategic
objectives; and
Develop customer experience
scenarios.
Strategy
Definition
17
Customer Value
Alignment
Channel Design
Network Optimisation
Manufacturing Operations
Warehouse & Transport
Operations
Sourcing & Merchandise
Replenishment
Information Systems
Performance Management
Organisation Processes
STRATEGIC
TACTICAL
OPERATIONAL
SUPPORT
Summary
Cloud networking is simplifying and removing barriers to information sharing in supply chain networks
New go to market strategies emerging with omni-channel shopping
New, agile retail distribution and fulfilment models required to get product to consumers in quicker timeframes
Peter Griffiths, Partner, KPMG
Peter Griffiths
Partner
KPMG Management Consulting Tel +61 3 9288 5319 [email protected]
18
The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the
circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough
examination of the particular situation. The views and opinions contained in the presentation / paper are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views and
opinions of KPMG, an Australian partnership, part of the KPMG International network. The author disclaims all liability to any person or entity in respect to any consequences of
anything done, or omitted to be done.