document3
DESCRIPTION
utuTRANSCRIPT
ABSTRACT
The objectives of this experiment are to study gas volumetric flow rate (Fv) measurement using
the orifice plate-pressure drop (h) method, assuming the gas pressure/temperature (i.e. density)
remain unchanged and at the values used in the sizing of the orifice and also to study gas mass
flow rate (Fm) measurement using the orifice plate-pressure drop (h) method, using the Perfect
Gas Law to compute the gas density from the flowing pressure and temperature. This experiment
is started by concentrate on the unit panel controller PIC91/PIC911/FIC90 in particular FIC91.
Firstly, the set point SV1 is adjusted to 15 kg/hr when FIC911 in manual mode (M) and first (I)
PID values for FIC91 which is PB1=200%, TI1=6 seconds and TD1=0seconds is set. The panel
controller FIC911 is changed to Auto (A) mode and watched the recorder responses until the
flow Fm (green pen) is fairly steady state at its set point SV1 to within ±0.1 kg/hr. Then, the
manual bypass valve is quickly opened by one turn and then shutting fully the manual bypass
valve to make pulse load disturbance changes. The experiment is repeated with first trial second
(II) and third (III) set of trial values which second (II) set values is PB1=100%, TI1=6 seconds
and TD1=0 seconds and third (III) set values is PB1=150%, TI1=10 seconds and TD1= 0
seconds by using the same sharp pulse load disturbance. As a result, from observation of these
three trials, we can see when the PB value is highest which is at 200%, the reading for every
meter is the lowest. When the PB value is adjusted to the lowest which is 100%, the reading for
every meter is the highest. In order to get more precise result, the time for disturbance take place
should be mentioned let say few seconds. Secondly, doing these test regularly with changing its
tuning will raise and give to us the best tuning for this system with the most minimum set point
change for given pass load disturbance. In conclusion, we can conclude that the experiment
achieved the objective by giving slightly accurate outcome as in the theory especially for first
objective.
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
PCI’s Flow Control Systems (FC Series) and Pressure Control Systems (PC Series) are
offered as a control centre’ which is designed to perform the required airflow, static or pressure
control functions for a specified control process. This control system contains all the
instrumentation necessary to perform the specified control process. The centre of the control
systems id connected to a computer, a shutdown or any troubleshooting in the computer or
connecting lines will not interrupt the dedicated control centre’s operation.
This control system represents a major advancement in affordable airflow and pressure
control instrumentation. The control system offered a few advantages which is accurate and
dependable, easy to install, start-up, and maintain are available with a complete line of optional
features to customize packages for the most complex systems and have "off the shelf'"
availability for standard applications.
There are four elements need to be highlighted in the process control which including the
process, measurement, control and final control element. In this experiment, air flow rate is the
process required. Therefore, another three elements which is measurement, control and final
control element will start with the initial F, which can be further defines as flow. In this process,
the control systems involved are FT (Flow Transmitter), FIC (Flow Indicator Controller) and
FCV (Flow Control Valve). From the P&ID provided, the process that needs to be controlled is
at pipe no 91. Therefore, all the controlled system process will be labelled as FT91, FIC91 and
FCV91. The type of valve for FCV91 is air to close based on the P&ID.
2
In this experiment, the disturbance will be considered instead of the set point change. It will set
up and the changes of the reading will be considered.
Experiment system AFMS211 is carried out in Model AFPT921 Gas Flow Pressure
Temperature Process Control Training System. This Model AFPT921 plant is a scale-down Real
Industrial Process Plant built on 5ft X 10ft steel platform, complete with its own dedicated
control panel. The process equipment and process instrumentation are real Industrial Process
type. The plant is constructed in accordance to industrial process plant standard and practices,
with fail-safe features. For example, the air heater cannot be turned on unless there is enough air
flow in the pipeline. The process flow rates are at commercial production flow rates, using pipes
and not tubing.
3
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Orifice Plate
A throttling device for hydraulic systems which prevents the cavitation of metal conduits
by liquid under differential pressure comprising a series of orifice plates spaced at interval along
the axis of the conduits.
In flow measurement fluid delivery systems, orifice plates are the main device that been
used. As stated by Ward Smith (1971), the great deal of work had been done is showed on the
pressure drop characteristic of orifices plates in ducts. Cylindrical tube orifices have also been
tested with the aim of achieving better measurement performance than that of orifice plates. Five
cylindrical nozzles of various dimensions in a 4 inch pipeline had been studied and they found
that the nozzles maintained a constant coefficient of discharge at Reynolds numbers much lower
than standard pressure difference devices (Jorissen & Newton, 1952).
Measurement of flow rate that been use an orifice plate requires a long straight upstream
duct because the upstream velocity profile affects the discharge coefficient of the plate and also
induces a large pressure loss through the device (Morisson, Hall, Macek et. al, 1994). The
straight section in heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems, duct cross sections
are generally large, so that it is required extra fan power for the installation of such plates.
2.2 Application of Orifice Plate-pressure Drop Method
4
Generally, orifice plate is used for continuous measurement of fluid flow in pipes. In
order to measure the flow rates at locations where the river passes through a culvert as well as
drain, they are also are applied in some small river systems. But only the small numbers of rivers
are appropriate to apply this device since the plate must remain completely immersed besides the
river must be free of debris (“Orifice plate,” n.d.).
2.3 Theory
The pressure loss coefficient of an orifice plate or perforated plate, k is defined as
k=∆ PsPv
Where ∆ Ps is the static pressure loss across the plate (Pa), Pv = [(1/2)ρV2] .
Foe an orifice plate whose axis is coincident with that of a duct or for a perforated plate
with regularly spaced holes, the pressure loss coefficient is influenced by the free area ratio and
the thickness/ diameter ratio as well as Reynolds numbers. The free area ratio is defined as the
ratio of the total cross sectional area within the orifices to cross sectional area of the duct and is a
measure of the extent to which the constriction obstruct the flow. The thickness/ diameter ratio is
the ratio of plate thickness to the diameter of orifice (Gan, 1997)
2.4 Application of Perfect Gas Law / Ideal Gas Law
Ideal gas law equation is expressed in term of mass, m (grams) and molar mass, M (grams per
mole),
PV = mM
RT
Expressed density, (ρ) also in term of mass, m (grams) and volume, V,
ρ=mV
Solve for m:
m=ρ V
5
Substitute ρV for m in the ideal gas law equation:
PV= ρ VM
RT
Both V terms can be cancelling and rearranged the equation become:
PM=ρ RTor ρ=PM / RT
This equation can be used to compute the density of a gas under any conditions of temperature
and pressure (“Applications of the ideal gas law,” Holt, Rinehart & Winston)
2.5 Experiment Objectives
The objectives of this experiment is to study gas volumetric flow rate (Fv) measurement
using the orifice plate-pressure drop (h) method, assuming the gas pressure/temperature (i.e.
density) remain unchanged and at the values used in the sizing of the orifice. Secondly, to study
gas mass flow rate (Fm) measurement using the orifice plate-pressure drop (h) method, using the
Perfect Gas Law to compute the gas density from the flowing pressure and temperature. Thirdly,
to study gas mass flow rate (Fm) control using PID control mode.
6
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
3.1 Material and equipment
In this experiment, the material used was compressed air. The equipment used was the
gas flow pressure temperature process training system.
3.2 Procedure
This experiment was split into two sections. The first section covers the study on gas
volumetric flow rate and gas mass flow rate measurement using the orifice plate-pressure drop.
The second section covers the study on gas mass flow rate control using PID control mode.
The first section of the experiment requires the collection of data on volumetric flow rate
on the orifice plate. First, the compressed air was supplied to the system. The system was set to
open system by letting the compressed air flow from supply directly to heater, then pipeline PL1,
passing FT911 and FT91, exiting the system by bypassing all equipment and instrument. Second,
the FCV91 was set to fully open by manually control MV to -6.3% on faceplate FIC91. The
reading on the FIC91 showed the maximum flow rate achieved.
7
Finally, the FCV91 was set to fully close by manually control MV to 100% on faceplate
FIC91. The reading on FIC91 should show zero value. The gas flow rate was calculated from the
data of volumetric flow rate obtained.
The second section of the experiment required collection on all instrument located on
pipeline PL1. The PID values were manipulated. Then, the disturbance was introduced to
observe the effectiveness of the PID values manipulated in controlling the process variable. First,
the PID was set to PB = 200%, TI=6 sec, and TD1=0 sec. Then, disturbance was introduced and
when the system back to steady state, data was collected. The experiment were repeated with
value PB = 100%, TI=6 sec, TD1=0 sec, and PB = 150%, TI=10sec, and TD1=0 sec.
8
CHAPTER 4
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
RESULT
Table 1
INSTRUMEN
T
READINGS
CONTROLLER
FIC911/PIC911/FIC90
I** II** III**
At the PANEL I/O Data
FT91, Fm X1*, % of 0-50 kg/h 30.1 kg/h 28 kg/h 30 kg/h
TT911, T X2*, % of 0-200 OC 14.1 oC 14.5 oC 14.5 oC
K K K
PT911, P X3*, % of 0-70 psia 82.4 psia 82.5 psia 83.2 psia
DPT911, h X4*, % of 0-
10,000mmH2O
3.7 mmH2O 3.8 mmH2O 3.7 mmH2O
PT Register
Fv P15*, m3/h 4.6% m3/h 4.7% m3/h 4.6% m3/h
Fvf P16*, m3/h 3.1% m3/h 3.2% m3/h 3.1% m3/h
Fvb P17*, Nm3/h 11% Nm3/h 11.5% Nm3/h 11% Nm3/h
f P18*, kg/m3 4.6% kg/m3 4.6% kg/m3 4.6% kg/m3
Main Face Plate
Fm PV1*, kg/h 15 kg/h 14.7 kg/h 15.1 kg/h
9
Recorder FPTR91
Recorder
Channel 2
Fm, kg/h 15 kg/h 15.8 kg/h 15 kg/h
Recorder
Channel 4
Density, f, % of 0-
6.165 kg/m3
7.1 kg/m3 7.1 kg/m3 7.1 kg/m3
At the PLANT
m3/h m3/h m3/h
FI911, Nm3/h 18 Nm3/h 19 Nm3/h 18 Nm3/h
PG911A, psig 43.2 psig 43 psig 43.5 psig
*Note: X1, X2, X3, X4 are in % and are at the I/O Data of FIC91/PIC91/FIC90
P15, P16, P17, P18 are at the PT register, Fv, m3/h
PV1 is at the main face plate display of FIC91, Fm, kg/h
X1: % of 0 to 50 kg/h or % of 50 kg/h
X2: % of 0 to 200 oC or % of 200 oC
4.1 Conclusion
The objectives of this experiment is well achieved as the results obtained for the gas mass
flow rate control using PID control mode are stable. The most stable data or gain is for data I.
This is because the PB% is much higher with quicker TI setting time. These combinations ensure
that the system gain is in ideal control mode. However, too large PB% slows down the response
and its recovery to the set point SV. The higher PBI value leads to fasten time taken to stabilize
the graph. PBI at 200% was the best value compare with others in order to the time it takes to regain constant
and it show that the higher value of PBI, the faster the time it takes to stable. Based on this experiment, we
can conclude that it is important for every industrial to have ideal setting value in order to
maintain their production stability in case any disturbances are happening.
4.2 Recommendations
There are some recommendations for while conducting this experiment that will enhance
the stability of result in future. Before doing this experiment, make sure the
pipeline of the plant whether it is still in good condition. Besides that, check
10
if the inlet and outlet of the plant is working and functioning well. In addition,
Ultrasonic gas flowmeter technology has many advantages over more
traditional technologies (such as orifice, turbine or vortex meters). This
system contains no moving parts, and does not create an additional pressure
drop. Students must read the manual carefully and make some research about how to control
the model machine and the variable involved. Other than that, make sure some precaution is
applied such as checking whether there is some leakage or not. The bypass pipes also need to be
checked.
REFERENCES
Ward-Smith, A. J. (1971). Pressure Losses in Ducted Flows, from Butterworth, London
Gan, G. (1997). Pressure Loss Characteristic of Orifice and Perforated Plates, Institute of
Building Technology, University of Nottingham
D. E. Seborg, T. F. Edgar, D. A. Mellichamp, and F. J. Doyle III, Process Dynamics and
Control, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2011, pp. 204.
Holt, Rinehart and Winston (1997), Holt Chemfile: Problem-Solving Workbook, pp. 170.
11