3rd ceegi advisory board1 resolute in the des era: indications & limitations georgios i....

45
3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 1 Resolute in the DES era: Indications & Limitations Georgios I. Papaioannou, MD, MPH, FACC, FSCAI Athens Medical Center Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory 11/6/2009

Upload: helena-long

Post on 23-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 1

Resolute in the DES era:Indications & Limitations

Georgios I. Papaioannou, MD, MPH, FACC, FSCAI

Athens Medical Center

Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory

11/6/2009

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 2

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 3

Use of DES in Europe in 2007

83 80

65 63

5449

44

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Tsech Rep Portugal Spain Gr Britain Greece France Scandinavia

DES %

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 4

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 5

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 6

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 7

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 8

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 9

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 10

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 11

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 12

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 13

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 14

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 15

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 16

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 17

Combining Proven DES Components with Innovative Technologies

Proven Components• Driver stent offers uniform

vessel support

• Sprint delivery system offers outstanding low-profile advantage

• Potent antiproliferative drug allows effective inhibition of neointima growth

Innovative Technologies• BioLinx biocompatible polymer

allows for rapid, complete and functional healing

• Effective drug-release kinetics inhibitneointima growth

100

80

60

40

20

0% Z

ota

rolim

us

Rel

ease

0 50 100 150 200

Days

% Eluted

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 18

RESOLUTE Single Arm First-in-Human (n=139) 2yrSingle Arm First-in-Human (n=139) 2yr

RESOLUTE Intl Non-RCT Observational (R=2,464)Non-RCT Observational (R=2,464)

RESOLUTE AC*

RESOLUTE US 2.5 – 3.5 Clinical Non-RCT vs. Hx Control (R=1,112)2.5 – 3.5 Clinical Non-RCT vs. Hx Control (R=1,112)

1:1 RCT** vs. Xience® (R=1,150,X=1,150)1:1 RCT** vs. Xience® (R=1,150,X=1,150)

2.5 – 3.5 Angio / IVUS Non-RCT vs. Hx Control (R=100)2.5 – 3.5 Angio / IVUS Non-RCT vs. Hx Control (R=100)

2.25 Angio Non-RCT (R = 129)2.25 Angio Non-RCT (R = 129)

4.0 Angio Non-RCT (R = 58)4.0 Angio Non-RCT (R = 58)

Non-RCT (R 100)Non-RCT (R 100)RESOLUTE Japan

RESOLUTE Clinical Program

38 mm+ – Long Lesion Non-RCT (R = TBD)38 mm+ – Long Lesion Non-RCT (R = TBD)

* Resolute AC: Resolute All Comers; **: RCT: Randomized Clinical Trial

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 19

Single De Novo Native Coronary Artery LesionsLesion Length: 14-27mm

Stent Diameters: 2.5, 3.0, 3.5mmStent Lengths: 18, 24, 30mm (8/9mm bailout)

Drug Dose: 1.6 g/mm2 stent surface areaAntiplatelet therapy for 6 months

Pre-dilatation required

130 Patients (9 additional PK Sub-Study Patients enrolled after original 130 patients)12 Sites (New Zealand and Australia)

Endeavor Resolute Stent

Clinical/MACE

Angio/IVUS30d 6mo 4 yr3yr2yr9mo 12mo 5 yr

Primary Endpoint: Late lumen loss (in-stent) at 9 months by QCA

Secondary Endpoints: MACE at 30 days, 6, 9 and 12months and IVUS and

angiographic parameters at 9months

30 pt Subset: 4month MACE and angiographic, IVUS parameters

4mo

RESOLUTE

N=30 N=100

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 20

N = 2,300 patients15 – 20 sites (100% monitored)

Western Europe

Primary Endpoint: Composite - Cardiac Death, Target Vessel MI, TLR @ 12moSecondary Endpoints: Composite @ 30d, 6mo, 2 – 5 yr; angiographic &

optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters @ 13 moDrug Therapy: ASA and clopidogrel/ticlid 6 months (per guidelines)

30d30d 6mo6mo 4yr4yr3yr3yr2yr2yr12mo12mo 13mo13mo8mo8mo 5yr5yr

Clinical/MACE

Angio/IVUS

Resolute Stentn 1,150

Control Xience V Stentn 1,150

Real World (Open Label)All Comers with symptomatic coronary artery

disease

ClinicalEndpoints

460 (20%) QCA subset50 (2%) OCT Subset

RESOLUTE All Comers

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 21

N = 1,399 patients125 sites

United States

Primary Endpoints:2.25 Angio In-Segment %DS @ 8 mo / Key 2EP TLF @ 12 mo2.5 – 3.5 Clinical Target Lesion Failure @ 12 mo2.5 – 3.5 Angio/IVUS In-Stent LLL @ 8 mo4.0 Angio In-Segment LLL @ 8 moDrug Therapy: ASA and clopidogrel/ticlid 6 months (per guidelines)

30d30d 6mo6mo 4yr4yr3yr3yr2yr2yr12mo12mo 13mo13mo8mo8mo 5yr5yr

Clinical/MACE

Angio/IVUS

Resolute Stent2.25 Angio (n = 129)

2.5 – 3.5 Clinical (n = 1,112)2.5 – 3.5 Angio/IVUS (n = 100)

4.0 Angio (n = 58)

Hx ControlsPerformance Goals

De NovoDe Novo Native Coronary Lesion Native Coronary LesionVessel Diameter: 2.25-4.2 mmVessel Diameter: 2.25-4.2 mm

Lesion Length: Lesion Length: 27 mm 27 mm

ClinicalEndpoints

QCA/IVUS subsets

RESOLUTE US

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 22

N = 2,464 patients~100 sites

International

Primary Endpoint: Composite - Cardiac Death & Target Vessel MI @ 12moSecondary Endpoints: ARC Definite and Probable Stent Thrombosis @ 12 moDrug Therapy: ASA and clopidogrel/ticlid 6 months (per guidelines)

30d30d 6mo6mo 3yr3yr2yr2yr12mo12mo8mo8mo

Clinical/MACE

Angio/IVUS

Real World (Open Label)All Comers with symptomatic coronary artery

disease

ClinicalEndpoints

RESOLUTE International

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 23

Angiographic Results9 Month Cohort9 Month Cohort

In-stent In-segmentPre-procedure RVD (mm) 2.79 ± 0.40

Lesion Length (mm) 15.87 ± 6.51 MLD (mm) pre 0.82 ± 0.35

post 2.74 ± 0.41 2.33 ± 0.44

Acute Gain 1.91 ± 0.47 1.51± 0.50 9 mo f/u MLD (mm) 2.51 ± 0.48 2.21 ± 0.45

Late Loss (mm) 0.22 ± 0.27 0.12 ± 0.27

Late Loss Index 0.12 ± 0.16 0.08 ± 0.21

9 mo f/u % DS 10.13 ± 12.63 21.08 ± 10.62

ABR n (%) 1 (1%) 2 (2.1%)

n=96

As presented at TCT 2007

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 24

0,8

5,4

0,0

0,8 0,8

7,0

8,5

5,4

2,3

Cardiac Death

TotalMI

(n=129)

TVR MACETLR TVFNQWMI QWMIDeath

RESOLUTE

Clinical Events at 12 months

Rat

e (%

)

3/129 1/129 9/129 11/1297/129 7/129 1/129 1/129

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 25

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 26

RESOLUTE

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) UsageDual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) UsageDual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) UsageDual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) Usage

Percent of patients on DAPT at: 6 months 9 months 1 year 2 years

RESOLUTE77.7%

(101/130)

58.1%

(75/129)

55.1%

(70/127)

43.3%

(55/127)

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 27

DES Current Questions

• “Off - label” use

• Use in ACS

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 28

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 29

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 30

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 31

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 32

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 33

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 34

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 35

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 36

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 37

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 38

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 39

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 40

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 41

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 42

HORIZONS-AMI

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 43

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 44

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board 45

Thank you!