3t-o' · pdf fileb. remove contaminated wastes to open entire ... the borings were...
TRANSCRIPT
13 \3T-o'
ASSESSMENT OF REMEDIAL OPTIONSAT OHIO RIVER P A R K "
Prepared for:ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT3333 Forbes AvenuePittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
Prepared by:FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC.
527 Madison AvenueNew York, New York 10022
January 1980
4RI00095
ORIGINAL. ; . " . ; ' . " ; ' _ • • : ' - . . - , ' • . . - ; ' : . : . . - - . . ( . . - ^ )f i . TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER . PAGE
LIST OF TABLES .. v ...............,...:. iii .
LIST OF FIGURES ...................... iv
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . . . ... . . ... . . ..... . . . v
I. INTRODUCTION . .'.. ... . . . . . .... . . . ".. . . .-'.".. .. . 1
A. Setting . ...... ' • ....... . . . . ... .... 1B. Purpose . . . . . .................... V
' C.; Sampling Results ..................... ,4D. Nature of the Cleanup Options .............. 5
II. APPROACH .......................... 7
A. Monitoring Well Installation. . . . . . . . . . . . .... 7B. Groundwater Sampling. .................. 14C. Electrical Resistivity and Metal Detection. . .... . . 17D. Additional Interviews . .'... . . . . ;\. . .... . . . . 21
III. ASSESSMENT . . . . . . ... . . . . . ... ... . . . . . 24• , ' _, ' . , f
A. Geohydrology, . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . ... . 24B. Waste Distribution. .. . . . . . ............ 29C. Water Quality ...................... 41D. Health and Environmental Concerns ......... . . . 63E. Regulatory Issues in the Development of Alternatives. . . 65
IV. MITIGATIVE ALTERNATIVES. ..... .......... .•'". .71' ' • ' • . ' . ' ' ' •
A. Continued Park Closure and Abandon Plans for the Park . . 71B. Remove Contaminated Wastes to Open Entire Park. ..... 75C. Develop a Limited Portion of the Park in the Possibly
Uncontaminated Area . . . ... . ... ..' . .... . . 79V. CONCLUSIONS,. . ............. ......... .84
VI. APPENDICES ......................... 87
A. Laboratory Analyses .... ... ...... . ..... AlB. Field Soil Boring Logs. . . . . . . . . ......... BlC. Soil Grain-Size Distribution Curves ... ......... ClD. Water System Data for Systems Near Neville Island .... Dl
AR I 00096
ORIGINAL(Red)
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE • • • • PAGE
1. Groundwater Sampling Data . . ...... .... . . . . .x. 15
2. ' _ Monitoring Well Locations and Water SurfaceElevations ........... .... ........ 27
3. Approximate Distribution of Waste TypesDisposed on Property . . ..... . ... . . . . . . . 40
4. Analysis of Groundwater Samples from TestWells: Ohio River Park. ...... . . . . . .. . . . .42
5. Groundwater Contaminants Exceeding WaterQuality Criteria for Human Health. ...;...... . 51
6. Analysis of Groundwater Samples from OffsiteTest Wells —Neville Island .... . . , . . ..... 53
7. Priority Pollutant Analysis of Ponded Waterand Storm Sewer Outfall ~ Ohio River Park .....'.. 56
8. Municipal Water Users Near Neville Island .......... 61
9. Scope of RCRA Hazardous Waste ManagementProvisions (Subtitle C), . . . ... . ........ . 66
10. Possible Costs Required for Continued ParkClosure. .......... .'.,:...•. ...... . . . . 72
i . \ . ' . " • '
11. Possible Costs Required to Remove Contaminated •Water. ......................... 76
12. Possible Costs Required to Develop Limited Parkin Possibly Uncontaminated Area. .. .......... 81
iii
4RI00097
\ ' LIST OF FIGURES
• • ' ' v
FIGURE v PAGE
1. Vicinity Map
2. Location Map of Monitoring Wells, Sampling Points,and Cross-Sections. ................. 8
3. Typical Monitoring Well Construction . . . . ... ... . 11' • '' » • ' *
4. Schematic of Typical Subsurface Conditions .... .... 12
5. . Soil Resistivity Map . . , . •.. . '. . . . . '. ........ 186. Metal Detection Map. . ,.'. . ............ ... 19
7. Generic Descriptions and Locations of MaterialsEncountered During Construction . .......... 22
8. Cross-Section —Station 71+00 . . . . . . . ... .... 30
9. Cross-Section — Station 79+45 .............. 31
10. Cross-Section —Station 86+00 .............. 32
11. Waste Disposal Areas and Depth of Fill . . . ....... 33
12. Waste Classifications Based on Sampling Points,Soil Pits, and Borings. . ... . . . . . , ... . ... '35
13. Area Assessment Map. . ... . . ............. 38
14. Total Concentration of Metals in GroundwaterSamples ......... ... ........... 47
15. Concentration of Volatile Organics in GroundwaterSamples . . >. . . . ... ... . . . . .'. . . . . . 48
16. Concentration of Phenolic Compounds in GroundwaterSamples . .',. ... . .... . . ; . .......... 49
17. Concentration of Total Cyanide in GroundwaterSamples. ....... . ... .... . . .... . 50
18. Municipal Water Users in the Neville IslandVicinity. ..................... . 62
. ' • " . ' . . - ' . . • • - • • ' ' - . • • , - ei?:—'.';l -. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • , :
. '' ' ••• - • " • '.'. : V ;:' ': OOn July 23, 1979, Fred C. Hart Associates, Inc. (FCHA) submitted a
study of the nearly-completed Ohio River Park at Neville Island for the
Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD). That study concluded that a '
health hazard exists at the park in its present state due to past disposalof pesticides and other toxic chemicals at the site. On September 1, 1979,
a second phase study was initiated to determine potential off-site environ-
mental effects resulting from release of contaminants from the park and todelineate and assess alternative remedial measures for the site. Thisreport provides the results of the second phase study.
A substantial volume of data was collected and interpreted in order todevelop and evaluate alternative remedial plans for the park. This included
. . • ' . • , • v j-information from the following sources: ^-^
1. physical inspections of the site;2. metal detection and electrical resistivity surveys;3. pn-site interview with representative of Navarro ,
Corporation;4. drilling and installation of 6 monitoring wells for
ACHD and 2 additional wells for Headquarters EPA;
5. boring logs and grain-size analyses of soil samplestaken during test well installations;
6. . sampling of groundwater from test wells andsampling by ACHD of surface water and storm waterdischarge; and .
7. analyses of water samples for an array oftoxic and related constituents.
4RI 00099
.Utilizing data from these sources, it was found that small quantities
of contaminants are entering the Ohio River from the park site via surface
and storm water runoff and slow but continuous groundwater seepage. Conse-
.quently, the unsecured wastes in the park site add to the overall degrada-
tion of the riVer water quality. The periodic monitoring of downstreamwater supply intakes should therefore continue. . - _ . - •
Remedial measures should be adopted to eliminate or reduce the contami-
nant pathways to the environment. Several mitigative alternatives are
presented to those who must determine the ultimate fate of the property.The alternatives and capital cost estimates follow:
1. Continue park closure and $150,000 toabandon plans for the park. $250,000
I / 2. Remove contaminated waste, $7,000,000 to^-^ with intent to rebuild the $24,000,000. . • ' . :' - .'..-• . park. .•.•''"•..•".-•• ' • '.
3. Develop limited park in the $300,000 toeastern section of the property. $430,000
The remedial measures associated with the f first alternative wouldmitigate the current problems of release of contaminants to the environment
' • . ' § • . • t
and would eliminate all direct exposure within the park site, with the
exception of workers undertaking the closure procedures. This alternative
would be the least costly of the three, but would preclude all recreational
benefits that the site was intended to provide.
vi
lO'O I 00
ORIGINALIn general, 'the monitoring wells were located so as to assure
cient coverage of the park site and vicinity. With the above purposes or
objectives in mind, the following rationale was used in locating the moni-
toring wells: four wells were installed along the site perimeter to check
. .for the possible lateral migration of contaminants off-site, into the Ohio
River; two wells were installed in the center of the site to demonstrate ifcontamination of the aquifer existed directly under the site, and, if so, to
• . provide information on the degree of attenuation and leachate migration due. ' - ' • . ' , • . > /to possible groundwater mounding; and two wells were located, one at theeastern boundary of the site 'and one off-site, to check for possible off-site migration of contaminants to the residential area east of the parksite. The specific location of wells in each area was also determined byattempts to avoid buried wastes, underground utilities, surface structuresand roads. , .
During the last week in September, 1979, eight standard test boringswere drilled and completed as monitoring wells at the locations shown onFigure 2. The borings were drilled with hollow stein augers and a drill rigowned and operated by Pennsylvania Drilling Company under the supervision ofFCHA field personnel.
After drilling through a minimum of 5 feet into the sand and gravelaquifer, the PVC screens and casings were placed inside the hollow stemaugers* to the bottom of the hole. After pulling the augers from the hole,a clean coarse sand filter pack was placed in the annular space around andoutside the PVC screen. The sand filter pack was followed by bentonite clay
- . • • • .pellets, clay soil and concrete seals as shown on Figure 3. The purpose ofthe three different seals was to assure that there would be no free inter- _ jflow, along the outside of the well casing, between any surface water orperched groundwater and the aquifer. , .
After .installation of the well and placement of the seals, the wellswere developed by flushing with tap water until the backwash became clear.This cleaning process usually lasted 15minutes, after which the water inthe well was removed by bailing repeatedly for a minimum of 30 minutes.
• ' ^ • - * , , • ' •
During the drilling of the test borings, split spoon soil samples wereobtained at 5 feet intervals for visual classification and laboratory analy-
ses. The soil samples were put in air-tight glass jars,'labelled and deli-vered to the NUS laboratory. Sixteen soil samples were sieve tested for
S • ' ^ Jgrain-size analysis. The boring logs and the soil grain-size distribution ^-^curves are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. The grain-sizedistribution curves were used for estimating the permeability of the sand
and gravel aquifer.
Iii general, the subsurface conditions encountered by the test borings
are shown on Figure 4..
Despite attempts to avoid buried wastes, three of the borings (MW-2, 3and 4) encountered buried wastes from the ground surface to depths of 10feet, 15 feet and 8.5 feet, respectively. .
-10-
The second alternative would also mitigate the current problems and
accommodate the full recreational benefits that were intended, but would
pose the most significant risk to*workers involved in the restoration work.
The implementation of this alternative would also involve expenditures
greater than an order of magnitude above the others.
The third alternative would mitigate current problems and pose poten-tially negligible risk to workers. It should be emphasized, however, that
the possibility exists of exposing hazardous or undesirable materials during
the phases of redevelopment (e.g., soil borings, tilling, plowing, etc.).
Should this occur, the feasibility of the project would have to be recon-
sidered. During the decision-making process, the County should weigh therecreational benefits which could potentially be derived from the site
against the costs and environmental factors addressed in this report.
If the park is to be partially or totally redeveloped, the results ofmonitoring and sampling during this work should prove that the remedial
, ' ' ' . ' • ' ' ' Y • * 'measures have been effective and that exposure pathways have been eliminated
before the. area is opened. Regardless of the option finally selected,continued monitoring and maintenance would be required to determine the
effectiveness of the chosen plan.
I 00103
'Al
A. Setting
I. INTRODUCTION
• - • • ,' ' . •,': • '. G
The Ohio River'Park occupies! a thirty-five acre lot at the western tip? - - . '
of Neville Island (Figure 1). Essentially completed, the park is located on
a site donated to Allegheny County in 1976 by the Hillman Company via its
foundation. The company is the parent corporation for the now defunct
Pittsburgh Coke and Chemical Company. The Allegheny County Planning Depart-
ment was responsible for the overall planning involved in the site's conver-
sion to a recreational facility, with the actual construction contractawarded to a landscape architectural firm. Of the $3.3 million originally
earmarked for site development, approximately $1.8 million has been spent;
equal sums being obtained from the County and the U.S. Department of Inte-
rior. An additional $1.5 million was allocated for a not-yet-completed
pleasure boat marina.
B. Purpose
In a previous contract with the Allegheny County Health Department, it
was determined that a health hazard exists at the Ohio River Park in its
present state, due to past disposal of pesticides and other toxic chemicals
at the site. As a result of that assessment, this study was undertaken to
determine potential off-site environmental effects, as well as to delineate
alternative remedial measures. The health, environmental and economic
impacts associated with each of the mitigative alternatives is discussed in• ' '
order to provide a complete framework for the decision making process.
rV i
AR 100105
The original investigation by Fred C. Hart Associates (FCHA) uncovered
several major, waste types: pigments, coal tar residues, crystalline solids, i )
liquid organics, sludges and leachate. Numerous toxic chemicals were de-
tected in analyzed samples, some in amounts exceeding existing Federal stan-
dards. These included benzene, phenols,, parathion, cyanide and mercury. It
was determined that these substances could create a variety of adverse
health effects depending upon exposure mechanisms. Several "worst case"
scenarios were developed to describe possible ways in which park visitors
could be exposed to chemicals. It was concluded that the presence of toxic*
substances outlined above, in the context of the scenarios, represented
potential risks to both visitors and park personnel. It was also consideredthat escape of hazardous materials deposited on the island into the sur-
rounding environs could further increase the potential exposure and risks.
. . • ' •• ' • • : '. •. ." OThe current report extended the environmental analysis to include
off-site impacts and to assess areas of the Ohio River Park site whichappeared to be relatively free of contamination. This approach involved
installation of groundwater monitoring wells, investigation of area-wide.drinking water quality, analyses of surface and groundwater samples, con-ducting resistivity and metal detection surveys, and interviews with addi-.tional individuals who are knowledgeable regarding the history of the pro-perty. Consideration of the data assessment and the proposed regulatory
requirements of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) yieldedthree mitigative alternatives with various options: (1) continued parkclosure and abandonment of plans for the park; (2) removal of all contami-nated wastes and restoration of the original park plan; and (3) removal of
I GO I 06
limited quantities of contaminated material and relandscaping to develop the
eastern section of the site. The report includes a discussion of the econo-
mic aspects associated with each of the remedial alternatives.
C. Sampling Results .
During the initial study, samples were taken at approximately twenty
points, principally located in the western two-thirds of the park. The* •"
eastern third ofl the site contains the administration building and main
parking lots. Preliminary analyses and previously collected data indicate
that this section may be relatively free of toxic wastes, although furtherinvestigation is clearly needed to verify such conclusions. Fairly innocu-ous crystalline solids were discovered in the samples taken at the westerntip of the island. Chemical analyses of the samples taken east of this
^-^^ area, however, established the presence of toxic substances, although they
are probably not uniformly distributed throughout the area. Localized high
concentrations of toxic substances may be interspersed in less problematic
areas. The waste profile could, for example, indicate that the eastern endof the park, near the Coraopolis bridge and the administration building, isrelatively safe, as it contains mainly inert materials. Unfortunately, the
1 • " • . - - • * ' . - ' ' • - - - '
middle section of the park, where the majority of new park facilities are
located, is the most seriously contaminated area, with a probable patchwork
distribution of toxic substances.
ARI 001 07
. ,D. Nature of the Cleanup Options .
' ••'••• •" •••'••".. '• • ' •• •• : '. ' G' The analysis of the waste problems at the park site will leave County
officials with the following range of options for the Neville Island site:
continued park closure and abandonment of plans forthe park;
development of the existing park plans and imple-;mentation of the necessary steps to eliminatewaste-related risks by removing the contaminants;or, .
development and implementation of a limited parkwithin the same overall area as the present park.
The scopfe of this report is limited to analysis, since the County must
make .the ultimate decision as to which option to exercise. There are a
number of factors exogenous to the specific- waste problems at the Neville \)
Island site .that will no doubt be weighed in the decision making process.
These might include such factors as (a) the availability of an alternativepark site in the vicinity; (b) the overall shortage in the area of the typesof recreational services the planned park would provide; and (c) the availa-
bility of funds beyond the scheduled $3.3 million. These and other related
issues may be very difficult to measure or objectively assess, as they dealwith such issues as citizens' willingness to pay for various services, the
future attractiveness of a recreation area once labelled "Poison Park," and
similar qualitative issues. .
While the special characteristics of Neville Island as a park site may
justify additional expenditures to recover part or all of the existing parkscheme, the millions of cleanup dollars most likely required for full park /^use may force the abandonment of such plans.
A R I O O I Q 8
.In summary, some key considerations, in such decisions are: --'
the availability of funds including, additionalFederal revenues, possible private sources, aspecial park bond issue, the viability of park usercharges for particular services or general park?admissions, etc.;
the particular service area that the Ohio .RiverPark was to serve, and how alternative sites mightmeet part or all of these needs. The island site,for example, could be used for marina activities,limited picnic, etc., whilealternative sites couldhandle other activities.; <
the public's willingness to use the Neville Islandsite and the citizen awareness effort that might berequired after the cleanup to allay public fearsregarding the site's dangers.
ARI 001 09
II. APPROACH
:'•' ' ' : '•'•.: ''••".." - ' •' • ' ' GA. Monitoring Well Installation ' •
• • - "" . y . .-
Six monitoring wells (MW-1 to MW-6) were installed for the County atthe park site' under the supervision of FCHA personnel (Figure 2). Two
' . ' ' . ;
additional monitoring wells (MW-1A and MW-2A) were installed under the termsof a contract between Headquarters EPA and FCHA in order to examine possible
. » ' • - *;
migration of contaminated groundwater from the park to adjacent areas.* • .,•
MW-2A is off-site, approximately 1500 feet east of the park. More specifi-. ' • - . . • • ' * • . 'cally,.these wells also serve the following purposes:
provide a xmeans of sampling groundwater to demon-strate the presence or probable absence of leachatecontamination of the aquifer; •
provide a means for measuring groundwater levels at ~*the site from which groundwater and leachate flowdirection and gradients could be determined;provide a means for obtaining soil samples forgrain-size analysis from which estimates of aquifer .permeability could be made;provide information of the discontinuity and thick-ness1 of the clay layer which, where it exists,would act as an impermeable barrier to the downwardpercolation o"f leachate from the buried wastes, tothe-sand and gravel aquifer below the clay;provide information on the depths, location andtypes of subsurface materials at the site, thatwould be useful in estimating the overall thick-nesses and quantities of buried wastes; andprovide sampling points for a groundwater moni-toring program.
f l R I O O i 1 0
ORIGINAL(Red)
rv t
GROUND SURFACE < ["/wiR&y/iCONCRETE SEAL —————————————————— 9
CLAY SOIL BACKFILL ———————————————
2 3/8 IN. CARLON PVC CONDUIT —————————(ASTM SCH 40)
8 IN. DIA. HOLLOW. STEM AUGER HOLE ————— »•
PELLETIZED BENTONITE —————————————— 'CLAY SEAL
GROUNDWATER TABLE
CLEAN COURSE SAND FILTER PACK ———————— »
SLOTTED 5 FT. SECTION OF PVC —————————(SLOTS STAGGERED EVERYINCH 9 120°)
n***X\tm*m
~7
/»••»
5•V••*•«11»jls*.
i»**v•*••
**
^*R|
M
H
^
^
^
•M
•••
•
J •
I>X.
\N7
iI•V
?/:•r-•V*:* *_ •* *
***
I •
tocsj
i <t
t
'
SAND ANDGRAVELAQUIFER
I
(NO SCALE)
FIGURE 3. TYPICAL MONITORING WELL*CONSTRUCTION
I I
A R I O O M 2
FIGURE 4 •
SCHEMATIC OF TYPICAL SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS(NOSGALE) WWGfWif
7*- EXISTING GROUND SURFACE,?/V J r . >AV A L ^ r WPERCHED t|t i*-wr< >
•* . ««l • *• A^PBW* I fr ^ ^ . '
•' '*!'.•'•.'•'.'•'•.' • '•.*.' .'.»'.'• ."•''••WATER -TABLE . v.
WASTE AND FILL(VARIES FROM 0'TO 20V
ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE
SILTY CLAY(IMPERMEABLE)
SILTY FINE SAND(SEMI PERMEABLE)
SAND AND GRAVELAQUIFER
(VERY PERMEABLE)
''./.-:/ SANDSTONE BEDROCK
AR 1 001 1 3
: •' " ' • ' O.tMiiSni.
- . (iled)In MW-2 and MW-4, voids were encountered from 6.5 feet to 10 feet and
from 6.5 feet to.8.5 feet, respectively. These voids or openings may be the . )
result of deteriorated 55-gallon drums, or possibly the result of settlementof. loosely dumped waste debris or sludges. The drilling for MW-2 and MW-4
revealed an absence of any impermeable clay layer which was encountered atthe other six boring locations. The lack of the clay layer at these loca-
tions on both sides of the island may indicate that erosion processes,sometime in the geologic past, may have removed some of the clay coyer soils
from areas along the margins df the island. The significance of the lack of
the impermeable clay layer will be discussed in another section of thisreport.
ARIOO|.|l»
i i
ORJGPB. Groundwater Sampling " ' /-7-vi'... -—— ----- -..——— -L.-_._^_ . . - - . IXO'.J
Groundwater samples were obtained from each of -the 'monitoring wells
on September 29, 1979. The type of bailer used and the condition of the
sample is Indicated in Table 1. Due to the large rwrrber of contaminants
detected' in- leachate and other waste materials- sampled 'in the Phase I
study, four of the groundwater samples from the bn-site wells (MW-2,
MW-3, MW-4, and MW-5) were analyzed for all inorganic and organic priority
pollutants on EPA's priori ty pollutant list, as well as additional metals
and pesticides , (parathion, 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, and Silvex) which had been
detected in the previous .sampling effort. The choice of the four ground-
water samples which were selected for the entire priority pollutant scan
was based on screening for total organic carbon, phenolic compounds, and
cyanide. Samples from MW-1 and MW-6 were only analyzed further for volatile
organics. . .
• . . ' ' ' • '
The off-site wells W-1A and MW-2A were sampled on two occasions.
The. samples collected-on September 29, 1979, were analyzed for represen-
tative members of the major contaminant types identified on the site:
cyanide (total and free), total metals (lead, arsenic and mercury),s ' .
phenols (dichlorophenols and 4-m'trophenol), polycyclic and aromatic
hydrocarbons (benzo-a-pyrene and benz(a)anthracene) , parathion, herbicide. • / . . ' ' . ' /
scan (2,4-D, 2,4,5-T and Silvex) and volatile organic scan (for benzene,
toluene, carbon tetrachloride, and chloroform).
The metal analyses of 'these samples were initially performed on the
unfiltered groundwater samples which contained a high degree of suspended
sediment. The monitoring wells were resafnpled on December 6, 1979, and the
_ . A R I O O I 15
\J
!I r-
Is
M£s *
ill!
i iiE 3 Ex* -^ w
ORIGINAL(Red)
., TABLE 1
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING DATA
' • •• . . • i • ' - • •
DATE MW LAB SAMPLE BAILER COMMENTS
9/29/79 1 NUS(1) STEEL SANDY, SILTY
9/28/79 2 NUS PLASTIC CLEAR BLACK
9/29/79 3 NUS PLASTIC , SILTY
9/29/79 4 NUS : STEEL SANDY, SILTY
9/29/79 5 NUS PLASTIC SILTY
9/29/79 6' NUS STEEL SANDY, SILTY
9/29/79 1A CDM<2) STAINLESS SILTY
9/29/79 , 2A .'_ COM PLASTIC SILTY
12/6/79 • 1A COM PLASTIC CLEAR•• ' ' .. . ' • '. '•• . ' ' : • ' • .' '
12/6/79 - 2A COM STEEL CLEAR
(1) NUS Corporation, Cyrus Wm. Rice Division, Analytical Services Labora-tory, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
(2) Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc., Boston, Mass.
-15-
groundwater samples were analyzed for total and dissolved metals. The
results of these analyses are discussed in another section of this report.
-16-
C. Electrical Resistivity and Metal Detection
:'; •''. ' . ••-:' • .'"'• • . • ' • •• •1. Electrical Resistivity. An electrical resistivity survey was under-
taken during the first study of the Park site in order to provide data for
interpreting subsurface conditions. For this present study, the electrical'
resistivity investigation was extended into the eastern portion of the site.and adjacent to the main parking area (Figure 5). The surveys were con-
ducted at approximately 100 foot intervals on north-south and east-west gridlines. A total of approximately 60 additional measurements was obtained.
The recorded readings were generally in a higher range than thosetypical of the western portion of the site. Values obtained from the pre-
viously run survey are shown west of the main parking area. The unusually
low values obtained from the most recent survey correlate with the locationsof buried utilities. Overall the measurements indicate greater earth resis-,tivity, suggesting the presence of less fill material. Thus, the resisti-
. , • • • • . ' , . . . . ^
vity survey supports the notion that the eastern section of the site (adja-
cent to the administration building, east of the main parking area, andsouth of . Grand Avenue) is less disturbed than the highly disturbed areas
west of the main parking lot.
2. Metal Detection. The areas investigated using metal detection in theeastern portion of the site are illustrated in Figure 6, The survey was
conducted by traversing the grid lines indicated, with a J.G. 'Pollard M-
Scope Pipe Finder set to buried metal response to a depth of 4 feet . A
significant deposit of slag, most probably, was detected approximately 300feet west of the administration building. In addition, several small areas
1 001 19
« -«__J--»-"\ «' < 4 <
f 8, £ S I s i .5 S
slyH«
ORIGINALwere underlain with material which caused measured reaction. Most of thei'l '
other areas of steady response can probably be attributed to buried utili-• N .-. j • - . •••. • '' • .ties. The approximate locations of isolated metal detection are also indi-
cated. Overall this information supports the notion that these areas have
received -less metallic fill than the highly disturbed section west of the* / • ' . •
main parking area. .
-20-ARI 00121
D. Additional Interviews
Information initially supplied by representatives of Navarro Corpora-
tion indicated the presence of barrels and semi-liquid wastes in areas
undercut during construction operations. These areas were delineated inFigure 3 of our initial report.
Recent interviews on-site with Mr. David Cameron and other Navarro
personnel yielded the following additional information regarding the generic
types and locations of materials encountered (Figure 7).
Pockets of tar were found in several areas iri thecentral portions of the park site. .
Wastes in solid form and barrels were present inthe north central area, while barrels and liquidwastes were, encountered in the southern portion ofthe park.A large area of ponded liquids existed nearthe center of the site, adjacent to a smallerarea of saturated soils.
Little or no excavation had taken place intwo areas near the northern part of the site. Onearea showed some slag and shale above clay soil,while the other indicated slag covered with soil.
Sanitary wastes were discovered behind the proposed.bath house on the southern shore. These materials,in conjunction with petroleum wastes, were alsofound near the north of the site.Limited work in the eastern portion of the siterevealed mostly soils with little industrialwastes. • • - -
Wastes in several areas were displaced during the construction process,contributing to a greater irregularity in disposal patterns than might
otherwise be expected. '
• ' • ' l "" •• -21- •- .'": . " - . ' ••
In the course of a meeting between representatives of FCHA, ACHD, EPA• • " •' .
and DER on September 14, 1979, information was obtained pertaining to a«• • • ' • ' ' * -x 'separate water quality problem on the eastern end of Neville Island.
At present, DER is negotiating with Neville Chemical regarding this'1 • l .
problem. Thus, some items of information regarding both surface and ground-
water quality, that could be used to supplement the assessment of possibleoff-site impacts of the Ohio River Park site, have not yet been made avail-
able. •'';•.. • • ; . ' : • '- • . ' '
The eastern end of the island is also the focus of an FCHA study under-
taken for Headquarters EPA. On September 29, 1979, subsequent to the in-
stallation of two monitoring wells (MW-1A and MW-2A), samples were sent to
Camp, Dresser, and McKee (COM) for analysis. The results are presented in
another section of this report.
-23-
. . .A. Geohydrology
. . .III; ASSESSMENT ..•(?.£<!) <
v::- - . • . • • • : O
As indicated by the test boring logs of the site (Appendix B) and by
logs of wells on Neville Island and vicinity, there is a major sand and
gravel aquifer that extends under, the entire Ohio River valley including '
Neville Island and the park site. This aquifer originated as a valley fill
(glacial outwash) deposit which, due to its high permeability and ready
rechargeability from the Ohio River, has served as a major source of ground-
water to residents of Neville Island, Coraopol is and vicinity.. ' - ' , * ' ' . • . .. . ; £
As shown on the schematic of typical subsurface conditions (Figure 4),
the sand and gravel aquifer is typically 40 feet thick and in many areas is
covered by alluvial deposits, up to 20 feet thick, consisting of silty fine ^
sands a n d clays. . . . ' - , - •
It is likely that the fine alluvial soils, occurring under at least
some areas of the park site, terminate at the river bank and do not extend •out under the river for the following reasons: ,
Silty fine sand and clay soils can be observedwhere they are exposed at many locations, along thebanks of the Ohio River, in the vicinity of NevilleIsland,
At the park site, the top of the sand and gravelaquifer was encountered in the test borings at thesame elevation as the Ohio River bed.
-24-
100125
ORIGINAL• (Red)
As discussed earlier, the clay cover soils may also have been eroded
from areas along the margins of the island. The lack of this impermeable• • ' - • ; / . . ; . , . - . . • •,-;-- . . . i : .- - . - •clay layer would greatly increase the likelihood of contamination through
the sand and gravel aquifer from wastes buried near the surface.
During excavation for the construction of the park, wastes were ob-
served to be buried in deep trenches. These trenches may have cut through
the impermeable clay layer, and would, therefore, have provided a ready1 • ' . . . » . . . .
passageway for liquid wastes and leachate to migrate downward into the sandand gravel aquifer. ' :
Based on the grain-size distribution curves (Appendix C) the aquifer
under the park site consists of clean (little to no fine grains), uniformlygraded coarse sand and gravel. This type of material would be expected to
^— <. have a high to very high permeability, in the range of 100 to 1000 feet/day
(under a uniform hydraulic gradient of 1 ft. /ft. ). ^ These high permeabi-
lity values are significant in that they indicate that water, or leachates,\ " ' • . ' . • .
can be transmitted freely and rather quickly through the aquifer, under theinfluence of the prevailing groundwater gradient. ,
* • ' ,'
In an attempt to determine the local groundwater gradient of the site,
water levels in the eight monitoring wells were carefully measured with an
electric water level indicator, during the months of September
(1) "Groundwater Manual," U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Recla-mation, 1977.
ARIOOI26
. . . .through December of 1979. The measuring points on each well (except well
MW-2A), were surveyed to obtain a common datum elevation. As shown on Table i 12, the water level measurements indicate that a very flat and basically
unchanging water condition existed at the park site. Several observations
regarding these water-level measurements can be made, as follows: '
the flat water table (no noticible mounding) whichoccurs at the site indicates very little to nolocal groundwater movement (no gradient- no flow);
the fact that the water table is almost exactly thesame elevation as the Ohio River suggests thatthere is a direct hydraulic connection between theaquifer and the river at the, site; and,the static (undisturbed) water table conditionindicates no noticible draw or influence frompumping wells in the vicinity — such as the Corao-polls well field, which is almost directly acrossthe Back Channel of the Ohio River from the parksite. . ' • . -i; • ' - .
' 'Although not measurable locally, a regional groundwater gradient,
controlled by the mean annual water levels in the Ohio River, is expected to
have the strongest, long-term effect on groundwater flow at the park site.
Based on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers data, the- mean annual Ohio River
gradient should approximate 0.5 ft./3000 ft. or 0.16 ft. /I 000 ft. If this
very slight river gradient is applied to the groundwater condition at the
park site, estimates of groundwater flow rates can be made, as follows:
-26-
ORIGINAL
, • : TABLE 2
MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS AND WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONS
' Water Surface ElevationsStation Existing Natural
MW Location G.S. Eley. G.S. Elev. 9-29-79 11-8-79 12-6-79 12-7-79. . . . - . " ' ' ' / .
1 87+35, 14'R 716.6 716.6 695.7 695.5 695.9 695.7
2 23+20, 38'L 715.2 705.2 696.0 695.7 695.7 695.6
3 31+62, 32'L 723.3 708.3 696.0 ? 695.3 695.1
4 44+70, 25' L 721.4 710.9 695.9 695.9 696.2 696,1
5 52+11,47'L 719.8 . 719.8 696.0 695.5 695.9 695.6
6 80+72,77'L 716.9 716.9 696.0 695.4 695.6 695.6
1-A 92+12, 35'R 715.4 715.4 695.6 695.4 695.7 695.6
2-A OFF-SITE, ? ? . ? ? • ? ?1500 EAST
-27-ARIOOI2Q
.IF: V •= Groundwater flow or specific discharge (ft./yr.) '.••'•" \ J, K = Permeability (1000 ft./day or 365,000 ft./yr.)
I = Applied regional hydraulic gradient (0.16 ft./1000 ft. or 0.000166 ft./ft.)
AND: V = KI - DARCY'S LAW
THEN: V = (365,000 ft./yr.)(0.000166 ft./ft.)= 60 ft,/yr.
Thus, under regional hydraulic gradient conditions a particle of water
in the aquifer under the site would move directly downstream, towards the
western tip of the island, at a rate of approximately 60 ft./yr. If theseassumptions are correct, it would take approximately 25 years for a particle
of water to flow from the eastern end of the site to the western tip.
-28-
^ ft i oo i
ORIGINAL(Sri)
B. Waste Distribution
In order to assess various mitigative measures and associated cleanup.. costs it was essential to develop an estimate of waste volume and distri-
bution. This was accomplished through the use of nineteen north-south crosssections. These were drawn perpendicular to the main axis of the island
(Figure 2). Three examples vare shown in Figures 8, 9, and 10; a cross-
section from the overlook area (Station 71+00), a section through the pro-posed nature center (Station 79+45), and a section through the suspecteduncontaminated area (Station 86+00).
Information was assembled from a variety of sources, and presented incomposite form. The sources of data included: (1) The Ohio River Park Site
. Block Plan submitted to Allegheny County by Environmental Planning and
^—' Design. These maps were used to determine both the preconstruction contours
of the island, and the contour modifications associated with the roads andparking areas as of February 1978. (2) The United States Geological^SurveyTopographic Maps. These-were used to determine water levels for the OhioRiver main channel and the Back Channel. (3) A map of the Ohio River pre-
pared by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in March 1964 entitled "Ohio River
Pittsburgh to Mile 30.9 Topography." This was used to delineate the contoursof Neville Island at that time. (4) A map prepared by the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers entitled "Ohio River Abrogated 10-15-64 U.S. Harbor Lines."This was used to outline the Ohio River Park site contours as of 1941.
These four sets of maps provided the basic data from which contourlines of depth to fill were established (Figure 11). Fill depths were
§o •CM
i— In n
(—< OS Q£CJ O IJJco z >
O Ul UlOS tCD t.
OSui aa. o uico ui H-
O Q >-"
P oP _jzo=3 Z Z _IO OOo: =3 o co ai— oo i— _J >• uiO _J § et •-*
O» O» Ul e£r* - >- CO• I % i a. t-«: i1—1
:J •••»••• i:t i 3 t'. • ;;.
• V i
o-o
CO
coCO
coLJ
o
o.oCM
-§CO
o S 2s s sI \ELEVATION (FT)' • . ; ' • • .30
*R1QQ
: . m mo oO CM"iT IIs s
Ul^J « • »•<: os oso o uiCO Z >•
s
f
Ul0u_OS
ao ui uiOS 0 O°££^ } »3 «M)^ ^ O^ _i 3 £3
os rs =3H- O Oco os osZ CD CD°WI—Ul IO •SJ"
«• OS GvO*)O 0. r-i—
§ 1 * 'y I ; i1 * 1
,
, I
> '
_l—11— 1U-•z_j<: I-H0>-< OS
ui ao. a uiCO Ul t—
' CO «fi Z
2zzs^M ^ *C *Pp ^
^ ^ J JES ^
O CO Ot-1 J igO. Ul cC CD OSJ OS «C i-i
1— G. =3 CQ U-UI<C «C OSOh- CO Z 0. O
f_l^Ij * *
,
, 1. - .' . . . '
. ' , -
•
/
•
' %. • ' • ' • •• • • 1
"•. '• • . " ' 1«l, . J
(
' ' -• ' ' :: 2• : • • : I•
"•1 - • .
' '• ' '• ." '••• • ••• -•..'.-' -'.• •- • ;.go
CD- ; 5 .J
• i(S /CC I< 1OL I
. . • . ' ' - >
:
i*
• - '' c. • <
• *
S- . • o '. . : enfx rx1 !
sZ' . •'
S >0g ^,
' • • — *^Y- .**'i +• *\ +*** ^£?iTJr
f\
\
\
\
sV•I11 •'.'
2\I "* *'&^ r ^
n ——ir
"!' .;'., : '
\li '•• ! !
1*1'ra 1i»>1
>i3 I> i %•< » 'K
V1 "xv° '!Sh^ -^
1
[f*-•-•• %*•
/
V
k*•
' ' •
"••S1
'
o- or
o- oen
O- O
<*J
'
o"» 0«
tUl^
-o |COI—Io
o- o•
- oCM
O— om
-§'f.'.t •• ' • •>
'
LO£5irs*
i— i•—
CO
Z0»— IK-oUlto1
1•
Ul
CDI-HU.
~4
'
ELEVATION (FT)31 4ft/00/32
o oO CM»-< ,II IIs ' s
J .. ..< OS OSO O Ul
CO
Ul Ul _I<CO , _JcCi-><C O HI OSU. OS Ul§ O U l H -Ulh- SH- «C £O Ul OZ O. O Ulr> to ui K-O Ul Ul =3 I— «Zoso o to <c zCD-SCCZ ^z —u. u. o Q i— • s:§0: os I-H z z s: <
=> 3 t- O « h-1-1 CO CO «C •-• I— Zh- O h- -JZOOOOO<i-iOO<i-i
OO
CD
OS S3 S3 O CO Oco os os«-i _i_j£:z«DtDa.ui«rcoosO —I OS «ec i-iO <tf" ~ H^ O. S3 CQ t *Ul VO «• CO S H- O ZO-r-F-h-tOZQ-O
i l s ^ - -
ORIGINAL= (fat)tr>
oCM
-8
0
CO
S2 tO Ul
CO1ooTOCM
J8•
. - • • • • ; • - • OR!GI?/Al ''• . , . - • , . ' . • • ' / " - d ) - . "
assumed to extend from the modified preconstruction contour to the 1941contour; however, a number of discrepancies were apparent. The width of the i j
island varies with each of the maps. Some of the difference may be attri-
buted to erosion and also to the variation in scale and accuracy of the
individual maps. Where these discrepancies exist the narrowest cross-sec-tion was used to estimate total waste volume. A second discrepancy arose In
areas which had been excavated below natural grade (as determined by the1941 contour), and filled in at a later time. The total amount of waste in
these areas was still assumed to be the difference between the most current*
contour and the 1941 contour, since the extent and depth of the excavations '
could not be ascertained. Finally, the water level of the Ohio River wasassumed to be 696 feet based on the USGS Topographic Maps.
Data concerning the distribution of waste were obtained from the sub-
surface soil investigation conducted by Richardson, Gordon and Associates in "*\
September 1977. Although this study primarily provided information relating
to construction design, it included results of fifty test pit borings whichindicated the location of industrial waste, slag, tar, miscellaneous fill
and natural. soil. Only five of the fifty test pits indicated the presence •of natural topsoil. This data was included in the cross-sections with the
notation TP (test pit). Each cross-section also included the results of the
sampling program undertaken by FCHA for the previous contract, as well as
the results obtained from the monitoring well installation. The results ofthe soil boring and sampling program are presented in Figure 12. The wastematerial detected at each of the sampled locations is classified as naturalsoils and suspected clean.fill, probably contaminated material or confirmedcontaminated material. The points which are suspected to be uncontaminated
~34~
•O-
< ;_
.•'.''.'.; • • • • . •.. ". • •.• - . ' - -:. • .; - ORIGINALcontain such wastes as: sanitary fill, slag, foundry sand, random coal,
bricks, gravel and wood. The points which are probably contaminated contain
industrial waste, tar or soaked wood. The confirmed contaminated points are
limited to those which were analyzed and shown to contain pesticides, coal
tar residues, phenols, or volatile organics. Each location In Figure 12 isdenoted by a symbol which is keyed to the cross-sections.
In addition, Figure 7, which is based on construction records and
interviews with Mr. David Cameron of Navarro Corp., indicates where wastes"
were encountered or moved. Finally, aerial photographs taken in 1952 seemed
to indicate the presence of trenches. It is possible that waste materials
were deposited In them and covered at a later date. These photographs alsoindicate that structures were in existence on the eastern portion of theNeville Island Park site at the time. Fill material now evident in this
area may have originated during foundation construction. Historical recordsindicate that these were army barracks for those men stationed on NevilleIsland during and after the Second World War. As a result of these indica-tors, it is reasonable to assume that these areas may contain uncpntaminatedmaterial. However, the possibility exists that some waste chemicals weredeposited in this area after the structures were removed.
The cross-section at Station 71+00 (Figure 8) indicates that an average
of twenty feet of waste was deposited in this section of the property.
Industrial solid waste and waste chemicals were dumped on the edges of theisland, while slag was disposed of in the central portion. There is apossibility that the slag was combined with other varieties of waste; how-ever, the exact composition cannot be determined. The cross-section at
a R.i-oo 137
Station 79+45 (Figure 9) is 845 feet. further east from the previous one. At
this section, the island is wider with generally six to eight feet of waste
material. A distinct pocket of tar was deposited south of the field estab-
lished baseline. The contamination of this area has been confirmed through
soil samples, interviews and on- site inspections. Pesticides were encoun-tered at one sampling point 250 feet north of the baseline, and slag was
deposited throughout the remaining area.. Waste material was removed through
a portion of the cross-section so that the road and parking facilities could
be constructed. The third cross-section taken at Station 86+00 (Figure 10)'
seems to indicate a less toxic area. Only two feet of waste was disposed,
most of which is suspected to be relatively uncontaminated. Richardson,Gordon and Associates indicated that this area primarily contained miscel-
laneous and sanitary fill as well as soil. A small pocket of pigments was
deposited at the southern portion of this section. ,
In order to estimate the quantities of waste deposited at the OhioRiver Park site the cross-sectional areas of fill were calculated. As
stated earlier this was assumed to be the area between the 1941 contour and
the current- island contour. The volumes were computed using the "average '* • - - " • . •
end area" method: A total of approximately 225,000 cubic yards of fill was.1 , . • - . • •
computed using this procedure. If this material had been evenly distributed
over 25 acres of the site, this would amount to an average depth of over 5.5
feet of dumped fill. .
Figure 13 provides a qualitative evaluation of the degree of hazard for
the entire park site. The assessment is based on the aggregation of waste
types in a given area. Nearly ten acres of the park contained wastes which
-37- &R100138 .
have been classified as '-confirmed contaminated,", and more than seven and a^ half acres, are "probably contaminated," The remaining seventeen acres along
the banks and at the far eastern section of the site are "possibly uncon-• taminated." .
Based on the previous sources a composite diagram was developed to
indicate the areal extent of wastes and their location. In most instances
the waste types were not encountered in discrete intervals as indicated by
Figure 11; rather, two or more materials were Intermixed., Most of the
aggregation occurred during the initial waste disposal; however, this was
' aggravated by the moving of wastes during construction. In each case the
predominant waste was selected .to describe a discrete area. This was used
to provide an order of magnitude for each of the waste types. The estimated
surface area of the predominant waste type was multiplied by its averagedepth, (again, determined from the cross-section) to arrive at the estimated
volume. Approximately 65,000 cubic yards of waste are .highly contaminatedindustrial waste, pesticide, tar or pigments. Another 160,000 cubic yards
are less toxic slag, miscellaneous fill and soil. Since the wastes do notoccur in discrete pockets it may be impossible to totally isolate the mosthazardous constituents from the non-hazardous fill. An approximate distri^
bution of the various waste types is presented in Table 3.
~39~
ORIGINAL(Red)
^ TABLE 3
APPROXIMATE DISTRIBUTION OF WASTE. T Y P E S DISPOSED ON PROPERTY
Type of Waste • Area (Acres) Quantity (C.Y.)
HazardousIndustrial Waste 1.3 . 16,800
Pesticides .25 4,700
Tar 3.4 32,600
;- Pigments 1.2 10.900
SUBTOTAL 6.1 A 65,000 C.Y.
Non-HazardousSlag 11.6 , 90,400
Miscellaneous Fill 10.8 ' 50,400
Soil 6.2 19.200 .
SUBTOTAL 28.5 A 160,000 C.Y.
. TOTAL 34.7 A " ! 225,000 C.Y.
-40-
C. Water Quality .
Based on analyses conducted for this study, the groundwater at the park
. site contains a number of contaminants at concentrations exceeding the Clean
Water Act Water Quality Criteria, as shown in Table 4. The contaminants• • . - . . . • *
consist primarily of metals, volatile hydrocarbons and chlorinated hydro-
carbons, phenols, and cyanide. For' some specific contaminants, such ascadmium, silver, and naphthalene, the groundwater concentrations exceed the
criteria in only one location. For others, such as lead and nickel, the
groundwater concentrations exceed the criteria at almost every location.
Figures 14 through 17 show the total concentration for each of the four
classes of contaminants (metals, volatile organics, phenols, and cyanide) in
the groundwater at the six well locations. The general distribution ofmetals, volatile. organics, and phenols1 is similar, with extremely highconcentrations of these contaminants occurring at MW-4. The groundwater at
MW-5 and MW-6 also has high concentrations of metals, and MW-5 has high
concentrations of volatile organics and phenols. For cyanide, the patternis different, with the highest concentration occurring in MW-3 and rela-
tively low concentrations at other locations. It is clear from Table 4 andFigures 14 through 17, however, that the most serious groundwater contamina-
tion occurs at MW-4, both with respect to the number of. contaminants de-
tected and their concentrations. *
To show how the concentrations in the groundwater samples compare to
the Water Quality Criteria, Table 5 lists the contaminants which occur in
-41-
. ; i?s*
m
-5 ' *-M
<8
% C 5C£ •*• r I
c? — .C£ .
en '. .
vo O•8o- en
CO*
t0 3§I
enCO Ooo
in•**
UI C! • '> 3
OS _ ^"C CO
0 0 - 1i— • «p» 3Z , -P* SO 10
•U
COto oo
' ' •' °.-co
• • f^
CO tt)—1 U—1 ' CUl O '3 «j » CMfc iUl
OSu.CO . P-LU 1—I 3
CO
CMP*« Ooo
*oo
COIO Oao
CO
OS ' • . ' 'Ul >>*— '
3 fO 3Z ™ ^ • _ _' "^=3 cr i.O 01OS S- -M13 Ol-p-
4-1 1_U. 10 CJ0 3-CO .CO
«c
" . t.a2, s
. .,2(Oo.
t
•0
u***•
-. '• c2oeos.
• 5. 5.
ooofCM
1 .
s;oooin§
i
oooCO
§o0*CM
Os
^0
u• »^» .e<o0
1(9O
- 'CM cr» • •
.\ v.
g e nCOen
o «j-O CMVO.A 'W^CM
VO OCO P-
,
CM 5
<O > CO^
>
•v
*oca*c? z"*-". «-»•*M P- .
•§. M30 £ «f— * ^
i^ M ^w*o 5 i2c .e to0) (O i +*.C >> 4)a. u S
*«• o
CO OCO P-
o oV "
inso o
'."•• V, ;'
in o
<o oV
^u
S•o•o* o
ui TJ< CJ
If1 <3
O'CMV
oCO
oin
oCMV
oCO
o -«3-
;
•o •*~0in
*J 'CJ•*•- *
p1*too'I—
1 §•p-
u
cCO*s-
•'§
ooCOM
pv
0«o
oCMV
o
ooo•
r~
,_3«_ ,
1ou
oCO
o
'•
oCM
0**
oinV
oCO
.oin
'S*
•a0)
CM•
OV
CM•
O
CM• »
OV
CM•
O'V
CMf
O
V
CM•
O
V
CM' •
O
,
"Sz
3
i
§CM
•
' OVOCM
OO
" ^ '
oo
*
§1
o
COCO(•M '
.. '•rjO
*«.
i
in o
in , o.* ' CM
V
O O«*• 10V
-
m ov ^
in oV V
-.in o
V Y
o af~ , P*
. ^*-• CJ>
•s *-*•p- J.S 010) >OJ •*-CO CO
§ o .. CMm vr
. -
§ oCM
O 0O CMen P-
O 0o CMCO \.
•
0 OO CMCM \f
a oO CM
V v
^
i•oin o*«*•p—
• ~J3 03
"*-* _>l 3
5 BC 01< 03
•
^ %'T30)3 •C+JC -Oo
«a-
Ul ._iI—
*al•Min£CW—
~~~
. 3
§«p-4-1<O£•McQ)UCoCJ
<o
inisi
<•
CO1g
s
0o 'p-.
oo
gCO
0o. ' ^»
V
CMg
'
1
1
o°V
ooV
o
0en
•
/
gen
op«3-
OinCM
oen
/
CO •— 1 1 t CO CM
• ' \-,
o i n i i i i mfS CMin • •• . p. .
•O P- 1 ' CM O • 1 Oo r^ •• »i| - r* , oo . , NI P- co-co ' ' >* 3 - . . .
': ' '
CO CO 1 1 CM 1 VOCO
, . . . :
CM vo i i P- p- in'V
CM «*• VO CO CM t CM
1
1
' '
Ct
r*.
r*.
i i in
I I
co co i o P> o... MI o co . voVI VI CM o. . • «. ' ' . ' • v o P —
vo en i i i co P-V
i •— co en en» / p — in
•H re•r-
*«
•M J-(OCJ
•*-» CO P- O —»in ""^ . ' • • co • P—- • r— 0) P- CM VO -CM CM
<• ' O O O O O O O O CM O O OO CM O O Oo • r*. . • p- .. «s-' * • * . • A • . ' A
m in r- i*»»
s- . . . • .0>•utt) "*E **£ cIS O -— «°- 2 £
^ e— ~ . 3</> «P-IO P-4-> 10O) J=E r-
^C
UeM
MU™C<0?0 •01•— 01•p- C- M O )10 NP- C-o ai> cst
ocNdja2oJMCJ
0)• cia4Jw2O ''20
1 ^+J1
• r-»•. ^
AP—
o>c50)o1-ou£at E1 OCM vp:
CM S-" °A JJ
p- 0
</)• ^~UO)' C0)
">»CLoa.2o
. .cu•o1CO
,*~
O)0)cat
^JUl
O•. co> re•o J=•p- *JO E
U 0
C O« ^S 14-> U<U ' *^*2: ai
a>c -IO4->
e5§_•T3• o
• o'
o> •c0)^4J .0)o^
' p""J= O)o cIO 0)J- -34-> P-0) O»— 1—
(
01co.>^ .
•MSe.r- CJo o•IT" "t« ~ ^»1— X
tt)
" 01u•o o01 CJ
c'ou
^
Ul
VO(Red)
inC O I Io
en en «r en «a- CM r-» in in p-en CM P— . CM p—
CO
CM
O r— I O O I I I V O C O CO I I I IO **• CM r^ P- VO MlCO CM • CM ' « '
A • l
CM ' '. ' ' ' < ' •
. P- P- CM . P— r^ CM p—o o o oto o oi i n ' i i i i i i ' o o o o o oo
Nl V V Nt V
. CM I O I
I I I V O I I I I i , * f I I O O
£5 £ £ S £ £ £
rO
o- s.0>
(O CJ
. o» o> • •>», -x, *^->.C C O) O» • C7> CTen in vo e ' e cc
O O O O CO O § ^3- CO CO CO COo co • voo o o en en CM CM. • p.* - ' .. . ' » . . .o o o o o oCO o o o o o o
01+J01
J-(0o.
• • p— p— or w» " • -, a>O O p - J S O l , : O
' ' C C ' O O. t. . - . • --P-0 > 0 > C O O 0 1 X
p- PT • JS JS - O l t - ( 0 T3 O( O O O O . O . p - p - J = O 4 - l > » O .
I I 2 ^ i = o S i «_ _ _ _ 01 0> fc. O O «>O, O. p- 4J JS JS 4J -P- t. OlO O ' (U O. Q. -P- t. O "9e> e> J 2 2 .5' Y .S 'G
• 4-> "O VO O -P-c c ^ j s i r «p- -p- io> a> u o ' ^ - ^ cc «*• «* &.«i i i • • - i i » • « o iO. CM 5J- CM CM C M ^ C M CM Q. O.
^P- Q
S- J-p- o rO (O P—
i. O O CO'fc P- - - U 4J 4J•a at <*• <3- -a 0.0.eC Q t3-'* Ul
100/1,5Ol 0)
ui_ica
"a!
£c«p-
1g«r-4JIOt.4->OJUCoCJ
vo1
ini
3*is
engp
CM1
I
*• • '" •. z z . z
in : 1 CMO 00 V O
CO 1 CM. .T , • • °
CO CM <•0 O O• • •
O O OVI
i
<«J- CM 1, • o en• •o o
' r- • 1- 1-z z z
z
COo0v«
CO0•o
VI
o•o
VI
•'
1
1—
z
\ .,_*sr
0 .
' A
P"»
.CO
oin»oV
. r-
Z
COCO
ino•oV
ino• •oV
rCM•B
1—
t
.in,_!
oin. * .oV
oin•oV
0en•oV*.
^
i— p- CO COvi vr ^
co
r- p- P- P- • CM r--
TJO) OCM OO O i— O CM r-3
.10 <a
10 O
ooO COCM <•
•o•p*U~4->
ato.
0)IO
U CJ CJ OZ 3= Z • Z.CO CO CQ 03
•if A v &CM
XOJB,
•r*CO
IO1ou'z1u4JCO<o
H- "o
2 P?* oCM a.
oCJJ_atj=4->O•o1C«HI«
zzgQ»(/>C5I_1Cu
</)c ~ojafc. at(C CU 012 5•o x:> 0.X <Ot. 0)IO Ur- «t
C3cOJf—IO4->fa.(COJu
•
Oa>u .IOi...c4->C
011o3 'PU.
OJc0)L..C4JCIOgJCo.
OJcat*IO4->:o.(OZ"
at•M1C
int~OJ4->vnUl
•a<opi",<o4-1-Ca.
IOf*>x:o.m
»331C•p-a
^
OJ4->IO*ioJ=4->J=Q.i— •>OQ
c•f"a
SRI 00 11*6
01
aio^-* c/ TJ Oai o
* 4-»
oo
VOI
ini
r - r - p - H- h- I— r- r- H- - C 1 .Z Z Z ZZ . Z Z ' Z Z 4-> fc. 01
O 4J• " • • . ' • • ' . . ' O J - P -" . - ' • ' . . . . C ( O
4J-P- C' • • • " . O S . n >
• , * - * . . ^ - S2u~vo in 3-p-oo'• « . -P- s-1- o .O 00 P— OO CM VO P- I gOO •VO CM \/ CM vl. 3 P- • OCO • * SB >> O -P-
J= 4J CJ»O X
" • • ' '• . ' • S_*(O CO' ' 0 3 • ' -
i^od)
CO
. . <o s. w» p— en o.. I I I O O I - P - O I - P - 3 SCM P- i. 4-> <P- g
p- 01 IO S O .O . «/»o co en 4J33 inCO P— ' 'p» -p- p— ^ CC M ' . ' • . S . O I S O I . - P -
. CJ .C O > I ,t— *. Ol • I S-
>» .Cp- O. 4J U O> -O H-o en i i i i -p- • .i* c at
CM p-f P- 4J 4-» M< -P- 4J. i is e e -P- 4-> oCO in P- OO 3 Ol 01 W
-CMC OT-P- 4-» ,
(O (O 4-> to O» • QJ> > 01 4-» "O 4->01 <9 <o en
4J X X U o
CMI
C M e n P - i . i 1 . 1 i , P - 01V
\JatOfI 4J 01 Ol
r- h- H- r- I— I— I— p- H- S- 01 > 4J p-Z Z Z Z Z . Z Z Z Z
4-» A3
IO (O3-p-O* J-,-2011-4-> S-(OO
• C S-CM T- <o en s <*-«r- Oi. -a in . tn +*o a» p- a> v> -^
U. -r- 0) (/) Ol UlVP- > ' 01 -P-•p- o» .e c t• OP- . 4J O.coi. • c-p-t.
4J Gtt— 10 QJ 4J 01P— W»P— . a i l - t o o<O <C"O P- <O $- Cen ai*-* at o. o-4-> <a
'O CM *-* CJ • O 3 C 01O C M C M «*• «^ C S C C W> -r- O»g»^ 01 -
o-
o o o o o_ - _ , jr- • vo o
£(Ca.
VO O O O *J- O
Ol
W)
ai4->I/)Ul
IO
015 U01
aiC
o -a
OS-a i a i
OJ-
O O 01P— r— C 01f -CO J=o o t. o-
&•r ; r o -P- o 4-» co
fl JS" . —» i— Ok-N P-. P- t. CM CM JS' T3•• • _ ;-r—i . ^^ <-t |01 O CM
CO 03. M P-
S > 0) t3 , Wl O -P-3r--p- U> Ol i- O 4->JS 01 CT-P- (. 01 01> 2 01 ja <p-p. 01 Wl S» 4 S ** *P"o —i -p- ai p- 3 P- P-
f -p- . Z' 01C 4J 4J 4J IP- > p-O C O O Ol IO•P- iO < C • P- C4J C M O C OO-P- i- «/» O» J i-
; 4->.p- gj O -P* i*2C 3 3C S C i-O.O O O -M nj
<O CJ CTP- VK t. aiX &. c. • c . s.
'o s - p - e n o i OS--P-2. (O Or- 4-» -M O<O''P-O
•p- X !- -P- "P- • i- S 3 «&.<go (/),4->-p-v>oai S c >, c i. at o4J OIO1 r- O1•p- 01 <P- > (9 4J1_J= lO'p- C O C O
0IC.P-4J
o
'flHIPOn-7
'(.lad*
FIGURE 14. TOTAL 'CONCENTRATION OF METALS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES• • • ' • • ' . • . - ' ;'!,-•
636
-
,' ' " i
1160 1187
15410
~
- -
j
•
2543
•
I
«•
1634
-•
. - - - . • •
••
••
m
15400
2500
2000 S
J
p-« en g
CONCENTRATION
1000
500
0MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-b MW-b
MONITORING WELLS47
. • ' ?*>')'.(*'In A I
FIGURE 15. TOTAL CONCENTRATION OF VOLATILE ORGANICS IN GROUNDWATER '
. . •
i
- ' " ' • • " . ' • • • '
122 ,73
32; I I
55838 r
x
- .
1571 -, •
•
Y . '
w
'•' . '•-
Ml
' • • • ' . "
13i iMW-1 MW-2 MW-3. MW-4 MW-5 MW-6
-JJ3UU-
: J
1500
•'...'
0?Ul1— 1
1000 ,3
?•VUl
CJZ .oo
500
° "O• MONITORING WELLS
48 4R 10011*9
• '•
FIGURE 16
. •-
• .
6
•
''• V'- ^ :
• • ? , • - . ' 'r .f . 'j _ -
''1^'nf'fAj• ' 'r*.!.
CONCENTRATION OF PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
•.
27
'•
36
f
25600
L J— - *- —— — —
\
958
L — \r^" ——
/ •
-
-
'
.
12
<
^
;-
"
'
—
25000
>
950•
^ *
1000?Ul
; I-H_J- . • "V.O53
OI-H
|
UlogCJ
50
0MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 MW-6
MONITORING WELLS
49 1001 50
FIGURE 17
t •
31
'
. - CONCENTRATION -OF TOTAL CYANIDE
•
»
- . . .
41
'
• \
_,410
_•
> •,.
• : •
•
••;
. '
24
IN
CR1GIMAL(Red)
GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
• '
39
• ' . - • • • .
• ' . . - . ; • ' -
• ' - ' • ' ' <
* '
49;v
:' ' '
400
100
\
50'
0MW-1 MW-2 MW-3
wUlCJ
MONITORING WELLS50 ";/s/
.TABLE 5
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINANTS EXCEEDING WJVTER QUALITYCRITERIA FOR HUMAN HEALTH
Ratio of Concentration in Sample to Criteria Concentration
Contaminant ____ MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 MW-6
Cyanide 2*Arsenic . 30QC 825C , 1650C 700CCadmium 7
. Chromium Total 3Copper 1.3
Lead 1.6 2.8 4.2 8.2 3.6Nickel 1.1 5.1 22 2 1.5Silver 6Antimony , 1.4 2 6 2 2.Beryllium 1379C 230C
Thallium 75 25 25Zinc ' 1.9Benzene . ' 2.5C 320QC 102CNaphthalene 3.6 •Chlorobenzene 3.6b ~.Chloroform 81CTrlchloroethylene 2.8C 1.8C2-chlorophenol 137 304-chlorophenol 32,4-d1chlorophenol ,f 12 10 440 58
PCB-1254 . 1000C 320QCPCB-1248 . 950C 2700CB1s ( 2-chloroe thy 1) ether 52C
• 1 ,3-d1chloropropylene 4.8
Me thylene chloride 8.5 3.5 4.54,4'-DDT 428 202,4-D , • Hd
a Criteria 1s for free cyanide. Sample analysis 1s for total cyanide.
b Criteria for tainting (20 ug/1) used for calculation of ratio.
c For carcinogens, the ratio of concentration in the sample to theconcentration corresponding to the interim target risk level of
- 1 per IO5 is given. ,Ratio of concentration in groundwater to maximum contaminant level(MCL) specified by the Safe Drinking Water Act.
' . . ft^Ji^f v * iu •<! 'j 11 i;-. I.concentrations exceeding the Water Quality Criteria concentrations for huMff)
health and gives the ratio of the concentration in the sample to the cri- . )teria concentration. ,
The contaminants which exceed the human health criteria include a'number of substances considered to be potential human carcinogens (arsenic,
beryllium, benzene, chloroform, trichloroethylene, PCBs, bis (2-cnloroethyl)
ether, and 1,3-dichloropropylene). In Table 5, the concentrations for these
suspected carcinogens in the groundwater samples are compared to the concen-
tration corresponding to an additional cancer risk of 1 in 100,000 (or10 ). Thus, for beryllium the concentration in the groundwater at MW-4 is1,379 times the concentration which is estimated to produce an additionalrisk of 1 in 100,000. This is the same as an additional cancer risk of 1 in72.5. Similarly for benzene, the cancer risk from the water at MW-4, which
' ' • ' . - . ' ' ' V J
is 3,200 times the 10 risk level concentration of 15 ug/1, is calculated
to be 1 in 31. It must be emphasized that this risk is derived from theWater Quality Criteria guidelines specified -in the Federal Register (Vol.
43, No. 97, Thursday, May 18, 1978, p. 21506) and is therefore based on the .
consumption of 2 liters of the water per day. Dilution of the water byuncontaminated groundwater or removal of the contaminants through advanced
treatment would, of course, reduce the risk.
The data for the analyses of groundwater from the two test wells to theeast of the park site (wells MW-1A and MW-2A) are presented in Table 6. The
samples analyzed for the classes of pollutants found in the groundwateron-site (cyanide, metals, volatile hydrocarbons, chlorinated hydrocarbons,
4HIOOI53
TABLE. 6
ANALYSIS OF GROUNDWATER SAMPLES FROM OFFSITETEST WELLS'— NEVILLE ISLAND
Concentration (ug/1)
V • Water QualityParameter ____ _ Criteria MW-1A MW-2A
Total Cyanide ' <10 70Free Cyanide 200 <10 50
Metal sArsenic (Total and Dissolved) 0 <20 <20Lead (Total and Dissolved) ' 50 ...' <20 <20Mercury (Total and Dissolved) 0.2 <10 <10
Volatile Organics i^\Benzene 0 10)?! 10",K .Toluene • 17,400 <lo(b> <}Q(°>
Phenols .Phenol ... 3,400 *10 *<10Dichlorophenol 0.5 < 10 <10p-Nitrophenol <10 <10
Chlorinated Hydrocarbons , ' " . - - . • *Carbon tetrachlorlde 0 <10 <10Chloroform 0 <10 <10
'• V ' ' " '
PesticidesParathion f » <0.1 <0.12,4-D - . 1dO(MCL)lcj 0.4 2.5 .2,4, 5-T <0.1 <0.1Silvex' • . . <0.1 <O.T .
Polycycl jc Aromatic HydrocarbonsBenzo (a) pyrene '. " ND NDBenz (a) anthracene • ND ND
(a) Metal analyses performed on samples taken on 12/6/79.
(b) Determined to be present in sample:
(c) Maximum Contaminant Level specified in the Safe Drinking Water Act.
ND Not detected. /
" • • ' - / f! r.-' \ 'phenols and pesticides) show little evidence of contamination. Low revets
of cyanide and 2,4,.-D were the only contaminants detected above the detec- \tion limits.
Although the concentrations of most of these key pollutants were below
the detection limit for the groundwater samples from.MW-1A and MW-2A, analy-
ses of the unfiltared water, containing a high amount of suspended sediment,
obtained when the wells were first installed, showed higher concentrations' * , "
of arsenic, lead, and mercury. (The concentrations for arsenic, lead, and
mercury were 610, 1,400, and 4 ug/1 in MW-1 A and 890,' 2,900 and <3 ug/1 in
MW-2A, respectively.) Although these results indicate contamination of thesoil in this area with these metals, their virtual absence in the ground-water itself reinforces the original opinion that migration of the contami-
nants from the Ohio River Park in an easterly direction is not occurring.
* ' •
Evidence of the migration of hazardous wastes from the site to the OhioRiver through surface runoff and groundwater percolation comes from the
analysis of ponded water and storm runoff. Figure 2 shows the sampling
location of ponded water and surface runoff which is discharged to the OhioRiver through two storm sewer outfalls. These samples were collected on two
occasions. The first .set of samples,was collected after some fishermen who
passed by *the island in a boat reported to the Health Department unpleasantodors which they believed to be coming from the park. At about the'sametime, a water pipe on the site broke, and an area of ponded water appeared.
The samples were collected on October 26, 1979. •
-54-4RI 001 55
V
The second set of samples, including ponded water from about the samelocation sampled on October 26, and two samples of discharge from two storm
sewer outfalls, was collected on, December 13, 1979, by the'Allegheny County
Health Department, after a heavy rainfall. The analyses of these samplesare shown in Table 7. J
' • • : . > ' - " r - .
The ponded water analyses show metal contamination above the Water
Quality Criteria for antimony in one sample and minor contamination with
phenols in both. The samples of storm sewer discharge show more extensivecontamination. The first sample from outfall No. 1 had an unusually high pH
(11.5), concentrations of arsenic and mercury above the Water Quality Cri-
teria, a very high concentration of sulfide, and showed the presence of
several phenols. The second sampling of storm discharge at this outfall wasalso high in sulfide and phenols. • .
The finding of phenols and sulfide in the storm discharges, combined
with the information that parathion was disposed at the site, is a strong
indication that degradation products of parathion and other pesticides aremixing with rainwater and being discharged Into the river through the out-
falls. Sulfide and 4-nitrophenol are the expected breakdown products of
parathion. 2,4-Dichlorophenol is a degradation product of the herbicide
2,4-D. The detection of these contaminants in the runoff indicates that the
source of these wastes is somewhere in the catchment area for storm sewer
outfall No. 1.
The sample taken from outfall No. 2 has a higher cyanide concentration
s , than the other samples. It is also above the Water Quality;Criteria for
'flftlOOI.56
CM
d f*COp— • p**
: tg CM«*- i—S*"'o
OSO. ' ~ *->OS • ^-» O l*»Ul ' . . p- 2E-> ^ . CO*H O r— p—OS 3 P- x»»«— • .<a CM0 VP-P-;Z •• - 3O Z O
!
00r r*1* oo o
CM O
'—
vovd P- Ooov ,c
I O1t— i i—
<c d r^u, «t z-».I— ' vo3 , OS P- CM° 1— *ioOOS lt_p-Ul Z 4->»—3 3Ul Ul O
in *p- . P- Op~ • OV °
CM
CO0
S z s-O o>*— •r- O 4JO»t*o . (Q r*Q COZ TJ P-
T3 CMOS Ci—Ul O«--p— a.
mr<I in oo
°»' CM
S0 J-^o 4J a>S 3 ^O ' ' 3 *«..o. vo
. -O CMU. 01 -x.O . TJ OCO O^I-H Q.
00vo co og
ow>
CO_J
1—
1— . .3 •1 ' y^O 0)0. 4J
f^ II-H L.OS (O0 0.••HOSa.
,
•• .
.
o« •£^w C• fQ. c a»>S 0
J"f"* O2 "£a: o <aa. l—o
,
-
u•p»• c01ocI-H
s-Jj;4J0•ocfl3U)
'I
ooCO
s
ooV
0o
V
0oCM
ooV
^ %
to
Is'•f*-^
oCM
V
oV
oCM
V
" '
oCM
V
OCM
V
_,o>caS.H>^0)ca
mV
in
V
in
inV
inv.
v
2• **••*u•p-c01J-
o
o
V
oV
oV
-
' O
V
s1*
s3•r-s•oCJ
oCO
V
O 'CO
V
(
o
*
. 0CO
V
oCM
V
^ ^i.CJ*-
• r_(Oo
§•fvS '
'• c.o
0CM
0CM
V
o
oCM
v
0in
' 3 •CJ"~*L.<UO.0.oCJ
0inV
o •inV
oin^
oinV
oinV
"3"a.««M-*
•o01
CMdV
CMd
V
9
o.
CMoV
CM•• o
V
O)•
>>'3(J
1
\t\CQ
o inCM
V V
'
o inCMv v
S v o.
o inCM
V
('
o inCM
Vf
•
z*-* 3f*m » '
at c. *S QJ
O P-•r- (UZ CO
57
••o013C•p-c 'ou
^
UlCOr
*--
X ,o3»
ZN O
r-
1 "*' fu^p-ZUl0zoo
CM
• eno r-.CO
^ ™^ ^(O CSJ<*-f—
0
O l>*ro~ ^
•j ^^
o r»»vo
r— CM
| ^ _—• ^^
3O
o: • ' CM
V
- OCM
V
OCM
v
4.5 o710 r* ? **
CO•OP-•CCMC P-O.
i.4->O-T«a r
vo•OCM•Soa.
0CM
V
CM
V
ooCM
V
o. oXJ-A
CO
'
oo0
'coCO
ooCM
V
8inAin
oom
V'
.'o3
V
oo
V
o0
V
oo
V
oCO
o
o««-
o
ooen
ORIGINAL(Red)
CO OtCMo i— i—
' Z
CO
VO O CO O00 CM CMP- 'CM
CO z z
r^. . m i - i i vnCM
i.a>a>E£IOa.
2"c10o-i-o
' t-0).co•ocVI
"io012:
tfl, . . - c' 3. ' ' . t-<c<J
• * - . ' • ' 2^•oCJ3c+Jc0u
I— tJ— - *— I— >)at <A *-> a:•*- "~* e *c* " oj
4) . 3 M p^C. -O -p- —— f-(D T- r— 4->> IP- P- 0 «p- p- IO . C •—•p- '3 ' J5 -P- Oin co i— M • •>
0) Ol V)C C P^OJ Ol ON 3 CC P- • O»O) O J=ea t— o.
ocO) P-J= 0O. C
p- 0>v> o xr<0 CO.• ^ 0) O
p- *Z t-V) O O. O P—•a c o P- oO. OJ J- J= CCJ .C O U 01
O- P- -P- .CU O J= t. O.•P- C. 0 4J Op- P- O -P- 1 i-O O P- TJ VO 4->C C J= 1 « -p-01 a* u <• <• cJ= .C 1 « » .10. C_ CM CM CM <•
001 58
•
•'•
"•a013C ••r-4-1
O0
r-
Ulcar- ' '
•
-x»03*M0
Zo
. I-H
r-
as1—zUl
" ozoo
CM• enO fv
COp— p—
o
."eno r-.
*ia CM4-1 —— •
O
^dr .p— CM
iO ^tp-p-0
s.OI-—4J Cf»
CO
13 CMC P—
Q.*"*
t.01 -—fl PN.
VO
•SoCP-o-*—*a.
CM in
z z
IP- •— < p- p- p- oY cr>V v; z VI V VI -
z z S z z z
' •• - ,:•'• '•'- •;-.- \J
CM CM . I t IP- CO 00
j-01QJl±<o<9
J_• > QJ
4J
• • ' ' ' • . c_§
_,•oO)3C•p-4JC0uIO
*ocOl.ca.
. t-co
P- . Op- O 0o c s_c oi -a0> -C ' >,.CO. =Ca. P-2>> TJj: 01+J +J 4->•P" 01 ' iOc , s c•5 -5 ' "jL1 I O
• • • « !cCM CM O
O1 -o
<ao
01 i-•0 4J
P- S-• <U
E oi •' -T-0 C P-VP- Ol OOP- >1i. >> U|2 4J p-1S 01 *Ocj s a.
014J
, . - < a
i *vtoi-tauoi.•5,55J(rtK-p>»
IOoCJ
•§. «*-* . (O
VI. i-01
01 tf»C 01 Ul
0) ' 01 C• c s- ai aiat ai j= •— +->O C 4J (O <O' to o» e .c P-fc- S- (O 4J 10f O C -C -C4-> 3 01 O- 4->-C r- J= IO .C«C u, a. z a.
>» <ox J=Ol • 4Jp- O.
+J >>
Ol 4->1 UCM O
CIS) 1 '•p- -p-CQ a
w.l'Ji
•o01•3•p*
1
^
Ul
*""
_Cn
*»M*
O
r-
OSr-
• ZUlozoo
CM• cnO f"^Z ».
CO
IO CMV|- r—
O
. cno r^CO
-f-A %••»
0
• 07O f"^
VOi— CM§1o
'£-4J cnIO I>CO
•O P—01 •**•O CMC P-p-
s.. +j cn
vo•O CM03 -v.•o oo.'*
•01cIO4-101
l~ >>* g- g5 §<o v) o> P-u o o
IO -P- i. 4->O. C O O
10 •— i-cr .c 4->S- O -P-o i c
CM -P-J- •' »-• -O0) Ij= vi vo4J -P- «TO ca CM
01
0)
O)"a.<o
o•p-4->
03
'8
O.CoO)ca>
4Ja>
•o o•p- 4J
O)3
'OJ "O P- OlO 01 JO 4JC 4-> IO UO) U P- 01&. •" 0) *P* 4**O) 4J IO 0)<*- o> > -at. T3 1Ca> 4->
001 60
antimony, thallium and benzene. Although this sample was not
specific phenols by a GC-Hass Spec scan, it does have a higher total phenol \
concentration than the other outfall samples.
The neighboring community water supply systems downgradient from- OhioRiver Park include, among others, Sewickley and Moon. A summary of the
1 .
location, type of water supply treatment, and average flow rates of thearea's water supply systems is presented in Table 8 and Figure 18. A more
detailed description of the treatment systems and analyses of raw and fin--' > ' ' p :
ished water in these systems is presented in Appendix 0., j • ' . . • ' ' -
The quality of the water received by these systems may be currently
affected by discharges of contaminants into the Ohio River by surface runoff
from the park as well as by discharges of contaminants from the groundwater
at the park. To quantify the impacts of wastes from the site on these /"—^
communities, the background water quality of the aquifer and the Ohio River
must also be considered. The river and the aquifer are suspected to be
contaminated by a variety of sources upstream from Ohio River Park. Esti-
mating the contribution of leachate or surface runoff to community drinking •• ' • ' . " • •>
water supplies also requires data on present rates of surface runoff and
infiltration and the rates of dilution and mixing of water, from Neville
Island with other sources. Regardless of the amount of the hazardous chemi-
cals which are reaching community water supplies from Ohio River Park, the
nature of these substances requires that they be prevented from entering any
potable water/ source.
-60-:00.1 6 I
TABLE 8
MUNICIPAL WATER USERS NEAR NEVILLE ISLAND
Water SystemMap Symbol (Municipality) Average Flow Rate (MGD) Intake Treatment
A Coraopolis 1.2 Wells Filtration. Chlorination
B Dlxmont 0.2 River ChlorinationFiltration
• • , Powdered Act.. . Carbon
C Moon 2.5 Wells Chlorination• ' . . . . . . • • Filtration
, Fluoridation
D Robinson 1.5 .River FiltrationChlorination
; .'..,. Fluoridation. Powdered Act.
Carbon, ifNecessary
E Sewickley 1.0 River, Filtration,• Wells Chlorination
. . Fluoridation
F West View 15.5 Wells FiltrationChlorinationFluoridation
'00/62
FIGURE 18: MUNICIPAL WATER USERS IN THENEVILUErJSLAND VICINITY.UEfJSLANO VICINI
W1UOI63
D. Health and Environmental Concerns' - • - . • . . . • • • ' • " ' • . ^ . . . . .
Information and data obtained from previous work, in addition to speci-
fic sampling done during this phase of the study, indicate that there are
three main routes of human exposure from the park site contaminants. Ofprimary concern is the effect on the water quality of the Ohio River fromthe surface water runoff, storm sewer outfalls, and groundwater discharge.
In addition, the secondary routes examined here include air contamination
and worker exposure during any construction activities.
1. Ohio River. Although there is probably little or no lateral
movement of groundwater from -the site to the opposite banks (see section on
Geohydrology), there is a slow but continuous flow of contaminants down-
stream into the Ohio River. Consequently, the unsecured wastes in the park
site add to the degradation of the river water quality. When taken together
with all of the upstream point sources discharging into the Ohio River there
could be a detectable cumulative effect which could potentially interfere
with the potability of the river. Several governmental agencies are pre-sently studying chemical contamination in the Ohio River with respect to its
use as a drinking water source. Downstream intakes should continue to bemonitored periodically and, if necessary, advanced water treatment should be
introduced for the removal of the contaminants found.
In any case, toxic chemicals should be prevented from flowing into 'a
body of water such as the Ohio'River. The Clean Water Act states that itsf . - -
objective-is to restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological
-63-
integrity of the Nation's waters. Adherence to this policy clearly requires
that some action be taken to eliminate the exposure from the wastes via the . \river.
2. Air Contamination. The finding of relatively high amounts of
volatile materials in the park creates a concern for airborne contamination ,
as an exposure route. As a secondary concern, the potential air exposure
will be addressed in the discussion of the mitigative alternatives in* ' • ' .' ' -
another section of this report.
3. Worker Exposure. Whenever toxic wastes are disturbed, there is a
potential for exposure to the workers. This area will be discussed underthe mitigative alternatives described in another chapter.
-64-00165
E. Regulatory Issues in the Development of Alternatives'/"""—— "™ ——————^———I__—«. «———«- ^ . _
i . ' . , . ' . ' • ' ' '
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) was enacted by Con-
gress in 1976 to ensure that solid wastes are properly managed and to imple-
ment resource conservation and recovery programs and technologies. Thispiece of legislation is pertinent to the consideration of options for the
Ohio River Park in that it provides the most current Federal philosophy onproper methods for dealing with hazardous waste problems. The U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency has been engaged in developing the regulations' ' : . / • • . ' • • •
needed to implement the Act. Because of substantial public comment and
agency resource constraints, EPA exceeded its statutory deadline for promul-
gating the regulations. Most of the regulations are now scheduled to become* • - : ' i ' '
effective in 1980.
The most salient features of RCRA include sections 3001 and 3004. The
scope of the RCRA hazardous waste provisions is outlined in Table 9.' ' ' " ' . I ' • • :
Section 3001. This section provides for a two-phased identification ofhazardous wastes. First, criteria will be promulgated for identifying thecharacteristics of hazardous waste. Secondly, on the basis of these cri-
teria, a list of specific hazardous wastes will be developed.
To determine if a waste 1s hazardous, EPA has distilled the common
features of hazardous waste — when improperly disposed — into eight groupsof candidate characteristics: (1) ignitability; (2) corrosivity; (3) reac-
tivity; (4) toxicity; (5) radioactivity; (6) infectiousness; (7) phytotoxi-city; arid (8) teratogenicity and mutagenicity. In the proposed regulations,
-65-flRIOOI66
TABLE 9
SCOPE OF RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PROVISIONS (SUBTITLE C
' • . ' • ' ' ,'
Section 3001: Hazardous Waste Criteria/Listing
Promulgate Criteria to Identify CharacteristicsIssue Listing
Section 3002: Hazardous Waste Generator Standards
Record-Keeping and ReportingLabelling of Containers .Manifest System
Section 3003: Hazardous Waste Transporter StandardsRecord-Keeping :Labelling . .Compliance with Section 3002 Manifest System ,
. Compliance with DOT Regulations :
Section 3004: .Owners/Operators of Treatment/Storage/Disposal
Record-Keeping/Reporting/Manifest SystemMonitoring/InspectionLocation/Oesign/Construction
• Maintenance/OperationContingency PlansOwnership 'Financial Responsibility
Section 3005: Permits for Treatment/Storage/Disposal Facilities
Hazardous Waste Data, . Site of Treatment/Storage/Disposal
Section 3006: Authorized State Hazardous Waste Programs
Equivalent to Federal Program. Consistent with other State Programs. Adequate Enforcement with Subtitle C
Section 3010: Notification •Generators/Transporters/Treatment/Storage/Disposal MustNotify EPA
. Required Within Three (3) Months After Promulgation of <Section 3001 Hazardous Wastes Identification-
~SS~ ARIOOI67
EPA relies only on consideration of the first four characteristics because^:those are the only ones for which established test protocols are available.
" - • ' Y ' . ' ' • • • - • " " ' - • • • . ' ..' - " • • - • • :A number of chemicals detected in leachate and groundwater samples from
Ohio River Park meet the hazardous waste definition of RCRA Section 3001:
Ignitabi1ity(1)
Benzene (liquid, flash point 12°C)Toluene (liquid, flash point 40°C)
Corrosivity*
Storm sewer discharge (pH close to 12)
Reactivity^
. Cyanide (found in groundwater at MW-3 and storm sewer outfall No.2)
(1) A waste which presents a fire hazard due to being ignitable underroutine waste disposal and storage conditions is hazardous according tothe proposed igni tabi lity criteria. :
(2) The corrosivity characteristic is designed to identify wastes whichmust be segregated from other wastes because of its ability to extractand sol ubi 11 ze toxic contaminants, especially heavy metals, from otherwastes.
(3) A reactive waste presents a hazard because of instability or extremereactivity.
' '
AR I 00 1 68
Toxicity(4) ,
2,4-D (found in groundwater at MW-4 and leachate at L-7)2,4,5-T (found in leachate at L-7)Mercury (found in leachate at L-13) \
Although other wastes detected at the site may also be consideredhazardous wastes by the RCRA Section 3001 definitions,the wastes listed here
are those which are present at the site in significant quantities. Benzeneand toluene, which are ignitable wastes, were detected in almost every waste
sample analyzed for volatile hydrocarbons. The storm sewer discharge sam-
pled at outfall No. 1 (on October 26, 1979) is indicative of the presence ofcorrosive wastes on the site. Cyanide has been found in significant quan-
' ' : * ' ' '• . ' •
titles in the groundwater and in; outfall No. 2. The three wastes listed
here as toxic were found in groundwater and leachate samples at concentra-
tions greater than the extract level specified under the RCRA regulations.
Section 3004. EPA does not intend to apply Subpart D standards to
inactive facilities even though these facilities may still be leaking and
(4) the toxicity characteristic is intended to Identify wastes which, ifimproperly disposed of, may release toxic materials in sufficientamounts to pose a substantial hazard to human health or the environ-ment. Since the most common pathways for exposures to waste contami- ]nants are leaching to groundwater or surface runoff, the only aspect oftoxicity currently proposed for control is chronic toxicity to humans.The toxicity characteristic is based upon an Extraction Procedure (EP),which is intended to model improper management by simulating theleaching action of rain and of groundwater In the acidic environmentpresent in landfills or open dumps. The extract resulting from the EPmust undergo the toxicity tests specified in the regulations. Theextract levels specified equal ten times the EPA National InterimPrimary Drinking Water Standards for these substances. j
. • \ • ; -68-' ' • ' • .'',
thus "disposing" of hazardous wastes into the air or surface/groundwat ''"-/.
Under Section 7003 EPA could seek appropriate remedial measures to control
the problems created at Inactive hazardous waste sites.
Several of the requirements of Subpart D, which have been developed to
protect human health and the environment for active sites, may be appropri-
ate measures to reduce the present problems at Ohio River Park. -Many of the
specific requirements of RCRA can not be applied to this inactive site. For
instance, a permit would most certainly be denied to a,disposal facility
located in a 500-year floodplain with sandy silty clays for its bottomliner. In addition,; ignitable, reactive, volatile wastes and liquids and
sludges could.not be disposed in landfills. The RCRA requirements which may
be pertinent to the problem at hand for. closing a landfill are discussed
below:/ - i \ ' '• '
1. , Security.
A facility shall have a 2 meter (6 foot) fence completely surroundingthe active portion of the facility to prevent the unknowing and/or unauth-
orized entry of persons. '•.•
2. Groundwater Monitoring.
A minimum of four groundwater monitoring wells must be installed at the
site. The recently established wells at the site are suitable for thispurpose. One well has been Installed upgradient of the facility to provide
-69- • " • ' • ' ,4RIQOI70
background data on the quality of the groundwater. A minimum of three
are required downgradient of the facility, sunk to different depths, to. ' - ' • " . . . • • ' . • ' . ' • ' • . . ' •
detect any leachate migration.
3. Design. Operation, and Closure of a Hazardous Waste Landfill.
In order to comply with minimum RCRA standards, design plans for land
fills should consider at least the following requirements:
Diversion structures (e.g., dikes, drainageditches) should be constructed such that surfacewater runoff will be prevented from entering thelandfill.
Surface water which has been in contact with, theactive portions of the landfill must be collectedand treated or disposed of as a hazardous waste.Where gases can be generated within the landfill, agas collection and control system shall be in-stalled to control the vertical and horizontalescape of gases from the landfill. Gas collectionand control systems shall not be required providedthe owner/operator can demonstrate that gases willnot be generated in the landfill or that gasesgenerated will not be in violation of the aircontamination limits specified and will not createa flammable or explosive atmosphere.At.closure, the owner/operator of the landfill mustplace a final cover over the landfill. This covershould consist of at least six inches of soil witha permeability less than or equal to 1 X 10cm/sec, underlying 18 Inches of soil capable ofsupporting indigenous vegetation. The final gradeof the cover must not exceed 33 percent. Wherefinal grades exceed 10 percent, horizontal terracesshould be constructed. Terraces must be of suffi-cient width and height to withstand a 24-hour,25-year storm.
-70-AR100171
IV. MITIGATIVE ALTERNATIVES / - i'^<' ' ''••' '"; • '. ' '•':•'. Vi '. '
A. Continued Park Closure and Abandon Plans for the Park
- . ' ' • - " , ' - . i •
1. Engineering Aspects. There are several remedial measures which couldbe applied to the site to reduce the present risk to human health and the
rates' of discharge to the air and surface/groundwater. These remedialmeasures would involve security fencing, covering with impermeable material,
grading, seeding and leachate and groundwater monitoring. Table 10 lists
these activities, estimates quantities, unit costs, and total costs.
A permanent security fence should be installed around the perimeter of
the park at the water's edge to prevent boaters from docking on the proper-
ty. Holes in the existing fence should be repaired to prevent'overland
access to the site. Additional warning signs should also be erected or
attached to the fence. The storm sewer outfalls should be plugged to elimi-
nate direct discharge to the river.
A minimum of two feet of soil cover should be applied over the hazard-
ous wastes, two options within this alternative are presented: 1) Option A
would: cover the 10 acres of the "confirmed contaminated" area (Figure 13);
2) Option B would cover 20 acres of the site. This cover would drastically
reduce the formation of leachate by essentially eliminating percolation to
the groundwater through the covered area. To comply with the closure re-
quirements of RCRA Regulation 250.45-2 this material should consist of 6
inches of impermeable clays with a permeability less than or equal to 1 x• / • • • ' * •
10~7 cm/sec and 18 inches of soil capable of supporting indigenous soils.
-71-
TABLE 10 ,
POSSIBLE COSTS REQUIRED FOR CONTINUED PARK CLOSURE
Description of Estimated Unit^ EstimatedActivity Quantity Cost Cost
Option A - Cover 10 acres
1. Security Fencing 4,600 Lineal Feet $ 10/L.F. $46,0002. Compacted Soil Cover 32,300 Cubic Yards 3/C.Y. 96,5003. Seeding 10 Acres 250/A 2,5004. Monitoring 4 Wells .
a) initial 4 each 420/ea. 1,680b) quarterly 16 each/year 270/ea. 4,320/yr
Option B - Cover 20 acres* , -S • ' . , _ , ,.
1. Security Fencing 4,600 Lineal Feet 10/L.F. $ 46,0002. Compacted Soil Cover 64,600 Cubic Yards 3/C.Y. 193,8003. Clearing and Grubbing 10 Acres 250/A 2,5004. Seeding 20 Acres 250/A 5,0005. Monitoring 4 Wells \ J
a) initial 4 each 420/ea. 1,680 ' ^b) quarterly 16 each/year 270/ea. 4,320/yr
Total Capital Cost for Option A $ 147,080
Total Capital Cost for Option B . $ 248,980
Annual Monitoring Cost Estimate $ -4,320
(1) Construction costs based on 1978 Ogdqe GuioVfqr Estimating Public WorksConstruction Costs, published by McGraw-Hill Information Systems Company,New York, New York. Monitoring costs are based on analyses only and donot include the cost for sample collection or shipping.
(2) Engineering design costs including miscellaneous contingencies and over-head are not included.
(3) Annual maintenance costs are not included.' ' '
4RI 0.01 73
Soils meeting this criteria should be available near the site. The unit
cost used for this estimate includes loading, local supply and handing, and
compacting. Additional fill material and grading provisions would be re-
quired to correct two Isolated problem areas. These locations are the pre-
sent low area south of the bleachers which currently collects and poolsrunoff and the area adjacent .to Monitoring Well No. 4 which was filled and
used as a disposal area for liquids during, construction. Seeding should be
performed to the new cover soils for stability. After establishing the
effectiveness of the remedial measures on reducing contaminant migration,-
quarterly groundwater monitoring would be required to monitor primary indi-cator pollutants. These would include specific conductance, pH, dissolved
organic carbon, nickel, cyanide, phenolic compounds, benzene, and 2,4-D.
- ' • f • • • ' ' , - " '-.,. *If the results of subsequent monitoring demonstrate continued contami-
nation, other corrective measures could be used. Subsurface infiltrationi • ' • • • " . - • - •
barriers, such as slurry trenches, grout curtains, sheet pilings, and bottom
sealing may prove necessaryi Plume management using groundwater collection
well systems involve a long-term commitment of manpower and funds to pro-perly install, operate and maintain. Any or all of these additional reme-
dial measures may be applicable and necessary to control groundwater conta-
mination. The picnic decks, shelters, bleachers, lights, and toilet faci-
lities could be salvaged to recoup some of. the costs which would be re-
quired.
2. Health Aspects. Secured fencing will prevent most of the exposure
routes of concern in the Phase I report. The soil cover would reduce or< j. eliminate the flow of contaminants to the river and to subsequent drinking
-73-
(Red)water exposure routes. In addition, the cover would form a thermal insu-
lating layer which would reduce the volatilization of the lighter organics i
on the park site thus reducing airborne contamination.
Worker exposure during this covering and seeding activity should beminimal because the wastes themselves would not be disturbed or moved in any
way. However, protective clothing and equipment should be used by anyone' . • ' . . . • - . . ' • • ' " " . .
working on or around the site.
-74-
' • • . . ' ' . ' . •/ \B. Remove Contaminated Wastes to Open Entire Park -"•'
1
1. Engineering Aspects. Removing the hazardous wastes by excavation for
reburial at an acceptable hazardous waste disposal site would be expensive
and practically and politically difficult. This alternative would also'require a substantial rebuilding of the park after this operation. The
process Involves excavating and loading the hazardous wastes and contami-
nated soils in leak-proof containers and transporting the material to a
better-engineered or sited landfill. Table 11 has been prepared which.
summarizes the activities for two disposal options.
The problems of locating and quantifying the different waste types have
already been addressed. Table 3 lists the waste types, areas, and estimates
the quantities that may be present on the property. If the most highly
contaminated wastes (industrial wastes, pesticides, tar, pigments) can be
physically segregated from the other material (slag, fill, soil) and re-moved, approximately 65,000 cubic yards.would have to be excavated, loaded,transported and disposed at another site, The work activities listed underOption A in Table 11 include excavating, loading-, disposing, and trans-porting the highly hazardous wastes. The costs to rebuild the park have not
been included.
Most probably these highly contaminated wastes can not be readily
segregated from the other material at the site and a more extensive exca-
vation would be required to insure complete isolation of the hazardouswastes. The work activities listed under Option Bin Table 11 include
~75" . , 4R100176
ORIGINAL(Red)
TABLE 11
POSSIBLE COSTS REQUIRED TO REMOVE CONTAMINATED WASTES
Description * Estimated^1) Unit^ Estimatedof Activity Quantity Cost Cost
Option A - Isolate .and remove most highlycontaminated wastes
1. Excavate, load, and ;dispose highly contami-nated wastes 65,000 Cubic Yards $ 65/C.Y. $4,225,000
2. Transportation 3,250 Trucks 800/Truck 2,600,000Total Capital Cost for Option A $ 6,825,000(3)
' " • - N ,
Option B - Remove all , •'fill material
1. Excavate load, and ^—^ .-dispose 225,000 Cubic Yards 65/C.Y. 14,600,000
2. Transportation 11,250 Trucks 800/Truck 9,000,000
Total Capital Cost for Option B $23,600,000(3)
(1) Transportation trips estimated for 20 cubic yard trucks.
(2) Unit cost estimates given by Walter Watson, Marketing Representative,SCA Chemical Wastes Services, Inc.,, Model City, New York.
(3) Engineering design costs including miscellaneous contingencies andoverhead are not included. Annual maintenance, sampling, and moni-toring costs have not been considered, o \ 11
-76-
excavating, loading, disposing, and transporting all the fill
hazardous wastes. The costs to remove contaminated soils or to rebuild the
park have not been included in this table.• - • • -' ' , ' ' • •
If moving the source of contamination to a better site is desired, the. • . ' ...•"•'.' ' ' ' ' • ( •amount of material that must be excavated, and consequently the costs, would
fall somewhere between these two options. Undoubtedly it would be prudent,
if possible, to delineate the hazardous areas from those non-hazardous onesduring the -excavation process to avoid excavating and disposing of the
entire fill material. During the cleanup processi a comprehensive soilboring and sampling program would be necessary to try to define the borders
and the extent of the hazardous wastes as they presently exist. All drums
encountered during these operations should be examined or redrummed to avoid
leakage. Continued monitoring would be required to determine the effective-.
ness of the removal plan.
2. Health Aspects. Removal of wastes would eventually eliminate all
routes of community exposure. While removal was underway, a certain amount
of volatile material would escape into the air, and individuals living orworking downwind might be exposed to temporary increases in the levels of
• . ' • ( • ' - . ' • ' ' . . . ' .benzene and other toxics, although no long term effects are expected fromN - ' . . . • / . .these activities.
The main concern in this alternative is the acute exposure of workers.
Protective clothing and equipment and strict safety procedures could be
required to avoid contact with and inhalation of toxic waste materials.' '
.'Aft 100-1 78
The greatest concerns in occupational exposure as discussed'ftrthePhase I report are: inhalation of benzene vapors, inhalation of cyanide and . j
skin contact with phenolic compounds and coal tar residues.
During excavation, special precautions should be exercised in areaswhere drums are suspected in order to avoid punctures and sparks which wouldlead to explosion. :
~78~ 100179
C. Develop a Limited Portion of the Park in the Possibly UncontaminatedArea : ~~ : !
1. Engineering Aspects. Based on the results of resistivity and
metal detection studies, sampling and analyses of MW-1A, and historical
.information, it may be possible,to open a limited,- uncontaminated area of
the property. This "possibly uncontaminated" zone, east of the main parking
area, is shown on Figure 13. Before this eastern section of the park could
be opened, extensive sequential analyses would have to be performed during
any redevelopment to determine whether the area could be classified as"confirmed uncontaminated." This total area is approximately 14 acres of
which nearly 2 acres have been paved for the main parking lot. It is uncer-
tain whether this paved parking lot can be considered adequately coveredsince cracks have developed in its surfa.ce.
As the initial step during any redevelopment of this area, it is recom-
mended that soil borings be taken, at 50 foot intervals and with a depth of
5 feet* . Visual inspection by trained personnel should be made on all\ • •
• samples. Laboratory tests should be performed on questionable fill material
encountered (e.g., tars, odor, color, signs of barrels, etc.). If the
findings from this step are promising and no hazardous or questionable
materials are encountered, the second aspect of the redevelopment program
would involve thorough tilling and plowing to verify that the borings hadnot missed any pockets of hazardous material. If questionable materials are
encountered during this work, they could be excavated and transported to the
"confirmed contaminated" area for redisposal and cover. Clean fill could be' ' ' '
~79"
' - • • ' •' • •• • • .'• ' .- ' " -. '''•', V; .'. L- , , flTftiM'Mjn.Ul,ir\l
imported to replace this excavated material. If this area proved to contain
significant quantities of hazardous materials, it may not warrant further )'•.consideration for park development.
-•' '
If these procedures 'did not reveal any new areas of concern that couldnot be resolved through laboratory analyses, this "confirmed uncontaminated"section could then be landscaped, developed, and opened to the public. Many
structures, such as picnic decks and shelters, which are now situated in thecontaminated area could be relocated to this newly opened area.
This "confirmed uncontaminated" area would have to be isolated andseparated from the "confirmed contaminated" zone. A security fence shouldbe installed which follows the periphery of the clean area with a buffer
zone, of at least 10 feet. This fence should also encircle the property at. • > . , - . • • . _ ; . . • ' • ' _ . • . . . . • . _ •
the water's edge to prevent boaters from docking. The "confirmed contami-
nated" zone should be covered and graded as outlined previously to reduce or
eliminate contaminant migration to the air and surface/groundwaters. Moni-toring would also be required to determine the adequacy of these remedial
measures. . .
Various scenarios are presented in Table 12 which summarizes major work
activities, estimates quantities and cbsts. All options for the redevelop-ment of this limited park area would require that remedial measures be
applied to the "confirmed contaminated" zone. Namely, these measures, which
have all been discussed previously, include fencing, security, covering,grading, and monitoring. All options assume that the material encounteredin the new area will not be classified as hazardous wastes which would
-80-flRIO'0181-
-•',).
TABLE 12 ;
POSSIBLE COSTS REQUIRED TO DEVELOP LIMITED PARK IN -POSSIBLY UNCONTAMINATED AREA"
Description of Estimated Unit^ EstimatesActivity Quantity Cost Cost
Cover 20 acres of"Confirmed Con-taminated" Area1. Security Fencing 4,400 Lineal Feet $10/L.F. $ 44,0002. Compacted Soil
Cover 64,600 Cubic Yards 3/C.Y. 193,8003. Clearing &
Grubbing 10 Acres 250/A 2,5004. Seeding , 20 Acres 250/A ' 5,0005. Monitoring ,-..'•
a) initial 4 each 420/ea. 1,680b) quarterly 16 each/yr. 270/ea. 4,320/yr.
Soil & Waste Survey .1. Clear and Grub 10 Acres 200/A 2,0002. Sdil Drilling &
Supervision 14 Acres 700/A 9,8003. Soil Analyses 50 Composites 80/comp. 4,000)ispose & Cover Ques- .enable Wastes
Option A 0 Cubic Yards 2/C.Y. 0Option B 6,200 Cubic Yards 2/C.Y. 12,400Option C 55,600 Cubic Yards 2/C.Y. 111,200Option D 65,900 Cubic Yards 2/C.Y. 131,800
2 Acres paving 1,300/A 2,600Plow, Grade, Land-Scape ,,v 10 Acres ; 350/A 3,500Relocate Facilitiesw 10.Structures 3,000/St. 30,000
Total Capital Cost'for Option A = $ 296,28o£?} Total Capital Cost for Option C =Total Capital Cost for Option B = $ 308,680 -' Total Capital Cost for Option D = $430,680
Annual Monitoring Cost Estimate $ 4,320 '
(1) Construction costs based on 1978 Dodge (2) Engineering design costs including miscel-Guide for Estimating Public Works Con- laneous contingencies and overhead are notstructi on Costs . pufal i shed by McGraw- included.Hill Information Systems Company, NewYork. Monitoring costs are based on '(3) Annual maintenance costs are not included.
'analyses only and do not include thecost for sample collection or shipping. (4) Light-weight structures are relocated.
. Toilets, utilities, roads and the bleacher, section have not been considered for rede-
• velopment in this, estimate.
100182
require expensive disposal methods. The options presented differ in thequantity of questionable material that may have to be excavated and redis- , i
posed and covered in the "confirmed contaminated" area. These quantitiesare based on calculations of waste areas as determined from Figure 11. the . ,
\ . 'four options are discussed below: •
A. No fill material was found to be questionable andrequired to be redisposed.^ .
B. 6,200 cubic yards of slag and contaminated soilshad to be redisposed and covered. •
C. 55,600 cubic yards of slag, miscellaneous fill andcontaminated soils had to be redisposed and cov-ered. . . . ' . •
D. 65,900 cubic yards of slag, miscellaneous fill andcontaminated soils, including the main parking/lot,had to be redisposed and covered.
All of the other requirements to develop this limited park area would ^-^essentially be identical for the four options, the major activities, esti-mated quantities, and costs are presented in table 12. the construction
requirements include remedial requirements for the "confirmed contaminated"
area, the soil and waste survey, the four options, plowing, grading, land- •* • .
scaping, and relocating some existing structures to this new area.
2. Health Aspects. Care should be exercised during soil borings and
plowing and tilling activities to protect workers in case hazardous mater-. ' . • ' , ' • - /
ials are encountered. If the area is found to be uncontaminated, there isno route of exposure. If wastes are found, worker safety considerationswill be required during the relocation of the material. Here, as in Alter-native B, there may be a temporary increase In air contamination which willprobably not cause any long term effects.
-82-001-83.
the securing of the "confirmed contaminated" area With fencing and a
soil cover will have the same effects as previously described in AlternativeA. .- . ' '" . • . ' , . •'. ' :: . •. ' :.
AR1001814
. V. CONCLUSIONS• ' • • • ' ' - • . ' ' . . ' . . ' • , • ' •
• . - . " • ' - • . - ' • • ; . • ' - • ' •Significant quantities of several hazardous wastes have been disposed
on the property which was developed as Ohio River Park. Contaminants from
these wastes are currently escaping ta the air and surface/groundwater. A-t . . ' . . • . . .
substantial volume of data was collected and interpreted in order to"develop
and evaluate alternative remedial plans for the Park, this included infor-mation from the following sources:
r ' i • # •
1) physical inspections of the site;2) metal detection and electrical resistivity surveys;3) on-s1te interview with representative of Navarro
Corporation;
4) drilling and installation of 6 monitoring wells forACHD and 2 additional wells for Headquarters EPA;
. . • • . • • • • - . . ' ' - ' . • . . . - . j5) boring logs and grain-size analyses of soil samples • <s>—
taken during test well installations;6) sampling of groundwater from test wells and
sampling by ACHD of surface water and storm water •discharge; and
7) analyses of water samples for an array of toxic andrelated constituents. • .
" • - •
" - " . . " ' ' • ' • ' ' • '
Remedial measures should be adopted to eliminate or reduce the contami-
nant pathways to the environment. Several mitigative alternatives have been: '• f ' • - ' '. ' -
presented to those who must determine the ultimate fate of the property.the alternatives and capital cost estimates follow: .''•••• ,
1.. Continue park closure and $150,000 toabandon plans for the park. $250,000
' ' '
-84-100185
2. Remove contaminated waste, $7,000,000 to.with intent to rebuild the $24,000,000park.
3. Develop limited park in the $300,000 toeastern section of the property. $430,000
the remedial measures associated with the first alternative wouldmitigate the current problems, of release of contaminants to the environmentand would eliminate all direct exposure within the park site, with the
exception of workers undertaking these closure'procedures, this alternative' \ - •" . • •
would be the least costly of the three, but would preclude all recreationalbenefits that the site was intended to provide, the second alternative
would also mitigate the current problems and accommodate .the full recrea-: • • - • r • ' • . . . . '
tional benefits that were intended, but would pose the most significant riskto workers involved in the restoration work, the implementation of this
alternative would also involve expenditures greater than an order of magni-
tude above the others, the third alternative would mitigate current prob-
lems and pose potentially negligible risk to workers. It should be empha-
sized, however, that the possibility exists of exposing hazardous or unde-sirable materials during the phases of redevelopment (e.g., soil borings,
tilling, plowing, etc.). Should this occur, the feasibility of the project
would have to be reconsidered. During the decision-making process, the
County should weigh the recreational benefits which could potentially bederived from the site against the costs and environmental factors addressed
in this report. .
-85-
...*«•'00/86
If the park is to be partially or totally redeveloped, the results of; ' . • . ' • ' • - . - . ^
.monitoring and sampling during this work should prove that the remedial i j
measures have been effective and that exposure pathways have been eliminated
before the area is opened. Regardless of the option finally selected,
continued monitoring and maintenance would be required to determine the
effectiveness of the chosen plan;
~86~ AR100187
ORIGINAL
VI. APPENDICES
A. Laboratory Analyses" ! • • "
B. Field Soil Boring Logs
C. Soil Grain-Size Distribution
CurvesD. Water System Data for Systems
Near Neville Island
ARI00I88
A. LABORATORY ANALYSES
Date of . •Sample Sampled by Sample Location Analyzed by Page9-29-79 , FCHA MW-1 to MW-6 NUS AI
10-26-79 ACHD Storm Sewer No. 1 NUS A15
10-26-79' ACHD Ponded Area NUS AI7
12-13-79 ACHD Storm Sewer No. 1 NUS A19
12-13-79 , ACHD- Storm Sewer No. 2 NUS A21
12rl3-79 ACHD Ponded Area . NUS A23
9-29-79 FCHA MW-IA and MW-2A COM A25
12-6-79 FCHA MW-IA and MW-2A COM A31
A R I O O I 8 9
- ' ," " WL 4 78
—-—• Rice Sample No. ________Project No. ''• 7985.01________ project!Date Received 9-29-79 _____'''
nice DIVISION . ' Date Sampled———9-29-79 ''V._____ Date Reported.ANALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORY
13 iMceue AVENUE . PITTSBURGH. PA. is»os
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC.527 Madison Avenue :New York, -NY 10022
ATTN: Dianne Sommerer
Sample Source . ___________'
Test results reported in mg/liter unless otherwise noted.
*M
,Rice -SampleNo.
'
»
/ _
VGA's reported by telephone to B. North 10/10/79 - CEG . .
Blank spaces indicate that: a compound was not detected. .'••VGA was determined on all of the samples; Acid, Base .Neutral, Pesticide- and Herbicides on only four samples(MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, and MW-5).( ', . _ ' " - ' ^
. . . i "
- ' * ... " ' ' ' / . - . • • '- ' _ - ' . -
. . i
' " ' • . " • ' ' ' ' ' ' • • " - " • '
PROJ TASK MO DAY RICE NBR IOENT TYPE AMOUNT
ITriJfTlf-1-.ll-.ni^HITfTTTHihlil10 11 12 22-' 25 26 , 33 3S ' 47 50 54 56 63
wu-J-73Rice Sample N<fl 2
r« Project No. ______ 7985.01 ______ Project Mar. C.E.GQ CORPORATION Data Received 9-29-79 Time. ___ 2:_30
CVPUS wivi RICH O.V.SION . Date Sampled 9-29-79, ————— _ pate Reported 10-5-79ANALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORY . £• • .
"13 rsiOSLB AveiMOE . PlTTSBuP.au. P*. 19303
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES/INCORPORATED ^527 Madison Avenue . DOT
Sample
Attn: Dianne Sommerer
. - •• .-• ' ',.-. • MW •• 1
Test result* reported in mg/liter unless otherwise noted. . .., . •' - ' ' •
DETERMINATION*010020030040050060070080090100110120130140150160170ISO190
200210220230240250260270280290,300310320330340350360370
Acidity Fret (CaCOa)Acidity Total (CaCOj}Alkalinity M.O. (CaCOa)Alkalinity Pht. (CaCOa)Aluminum (ADAmmonia ( ' >Arienic (As) (1)Barium (8a)Bicarbonati (CaCO3>Bio Oxygen Demand (Oj)Cadmium (Cdt (1) .Calcium (Ca)Carbon Inorganic (C)Carbon Organic (C)Carbon Total 1C)Carbonate (COj)Chem. Oxygen Dim. (07)Chloride ( >Chromatt (CrO4>
Chromium (Cr+s)Chromium Total (Cr) (1)Color (APHA)Copper (Cu) (1)Cyanide Free (CN)Cyanide Total (CN)Fluorid* (F)Hardnesj (CaCOa)Hydroxide (OH)Iron ( I (Fe)Iron Total (Fe)Lead (Pb) (1)Magnesium (Mg)Manganese (Mn|Mercury (Hg). *ig/1 (UNickel (Ni) (1)Nitrate < )Nitrite ( )
DATE RICE
0.006
< 0.01
431154
0.04
0.16
0.003
0.03
<0.20.15
~
/
DETERMINATION*330390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530S40550560
570530590600610620630640
Nitrogen. Kjeldahl (N)Odor, Method:PHPhenolic Cpdi. (Phenol)Phosphorus Ortho ( IPhosphorus Total ( )Potassium (K)Selenium (Se) (1)Silica Soluble ( . )Silica Total I )Silver (Ag> (1)Sodium (Na)Solids DissolvedSolids SuspendedSolidl TotalSolids Non-SettleabteSolids SettleableSolids VolatileSolvent Extract (Oil)
Method:Sp. Cond., 25* C jimho*Sulfate ( )Sulfide (S)Surfactants (MB AS)Tin (Sn)Turbidity (JTU)Zinc (Zn) (1)Miscellaneous
Antimony (Sb) (1Beryllium (Be) (1Thallium <T1) (1
DATE
' •
'
-,
RICE
*
O.Q06
< 0.005
< 0.02,
•
0.19
< 0.1< 0.02< 0.1
V /
•Special Instructions (Methods. Etc.)(1) Run from filtered metal bottle,
PROJ TASK MO DAY RICE NBR IDENT_____________•. ' •_____TYPE______ AMOUNT
-, 1 1 I l.l-l. liJnlri i- Q-,i
——: % Rice Sample No."_______' Project No.__ 7985-01 Project Mar.' CEG
I** ^"^ '»_«SiX' *_«_ » • CJ_.OO TO ' ——————^*—-> f. ————JCORPORATOM s^n Date Received y *y /?. . Time ____2:30 pm
CVPUS WM. P.CE O.V.S.ON Date Sampled _——9^23-79——:——— Date Reported ———10-18-79ANALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORY . '• .
> is fyoeL« Avenue • WTTSBUBSM.PA. isaos ' " Acid _____ B-N____' Pest
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC. VOA _——^————;———.GC/MS
Sample Source __———————__———__——— MW ~ 1 ' '___'.__!————"
acenaphiheneacroleinacrytonitrilebenzenebenzidine.'carbon tetrachloridechlorobenzene1 ,2.4-trichlorobenzene)hexachlorobenzene1 ,2-dichloroethane1.1,1-trichloroethanehexachloroethane1 ,1 •dichloroethane1 ,1 ,2-trichloroethane1 ,1 ,2.2-tetrachloroeihanechloroeihan'ebis (chloromethyl) etherbis (2-chloroethyl) ether•••chloroethyl vinyl ether
tiloroniphthalene>_ 4.6-trichlorophenolparachlorometa cresolchloroform2-cblorophenol1 ,2-dichlorobenzene1.3-dichlorobenzene1,4-dichlorobenzene3,3'-dichlorobenzidine1,1-dichloroethylene' 1 ,2-trans-dichloroethylene2.4-dichlorophenol1,2-dichloropropane1 ,3-dichlor opropylent2,4-dimethyfphenol2,4-diniuototuene2,6-diniuoioluene1.2-diphenylhydrazineethylbenzene
M/L
A'
'• .
P8/L
2
4
6
8
2
•
.
2
fluoranthene4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether4-bromophenyl phenyl etherb!s(2-chloroitopropyO etherbij(2-'ehloroethoxy) methanemethylene chloridemethyl chloride.methyl bromidebromeformdichlorobromomethanetrichlorofluoromethanedichlorodif luoromethanechlorodibromomethanehexachlorobutadienehexachlorocyclopentadieheisophoronenaphthalene— -nitrobenzene2-nitrophenol4-nitrophenol2.4 -d'mitrophenol4.6-dfnitro-o-cresolN-nitrosodimethylamineN-nitrosodiphenylamineN-nitrosodi-n-propylaminepentachlorophenotphenolbis(2-ethylhexyl) phthatatebutyl benzyl phthalatedi-n-butyl phthalatedi-n-octyl ph.thalatcditthyl phthalatedimethyl phthalatebenzolalanthracene '•benzoblpyrene3,4-benzofluoranthenebenzo(k)f.luoranthenechrysene .
W/L
,
P9/L
17
v
r
acenapthyleneanthracene • •• •benzo(ghi)perylenefluorenephenanthrenc 'dibenzoU.hlanthraceneindenod ,2.3-cd)pyrenepyrenetetrachtoroethylenetoluenetrichtoroethylenevinyl chloridealdrindieldrinchlordane . *. ':.4.4--OOT4.4'-ODE4.4-.ODDc-«ndosulfanp-«ndojuU«nendosulfan sulfateendrinendrin aldehydeheptachlorheptachlor eppxideo-BHC .P-BHC ,T-BHC (lindane)4-BHCPCB-1242 (Arochtor 1242)PCS-1254 (Arochlor 1254)PCS-1221 (Arochlor 1221)PCB-1232 (Arochlor 1232)PC B-1 248 (Arochlor 1 248)PCB-1260 (Arochlor 1260)PCS-1016 (Arochlor 1016)ToxapheneXylene
nl\.
^
P9/U
<11359
.. ' ' -
9Date Extracted . Date Injected Cone. Factor - Standard ' .' Book & Page No..
ACID GC —;————: ————:— ————— J———!—;—:—————-————— _:———:—————, • . GC/MS ______" • • • , ' ,_____'L________________ • .________________8-N ' GC _^______ ;_______' ,________ ' ' ______________________. •______:
GC/MS ' ' .. ' •_____• . ''• •' j ______ ; • • ' '_________VOA GC • -' _____' ' ._______ • _______i____________;_______ __________;____
' GC/MS _________ , _________ •' ' ' •_____',•''•" ____. ______________
*<><lO|ig/l. . • •*"<5jig/L m-GC/MS <» Sum of two compounds not separated by the method used A-Avetage
PROJ TASK MO DAY RICE NBR IDENT -TYPE AMOUNT———— —————————«nrr——————————————————— ———
*•> *t\ «s_ «« . <n
rt IS I ' ' • ' • • • ' w*-'2-73———. •.-..•• Rice Sample No.""'!lJ9(&08i6
Project No. 7985.01 Project Mar. ?'-C.E.G________Date Received 9-29-79______ Time 2; 30 PM
cvous WM. PCS DIVISION Date Sampled——!—9-29-79——.——— Data Reported 10-5-79ANALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORY . ' . , . -
19 Moate Avemue . piTTSBu«OM.PA,i3aoa .. • _ia-3_3-aaoo • _' . _ . • , I
?RED C. HART'ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED " . ^—^527 Madison Avenue " • .New York, NYt 10022• • •
Attn: Dianhe Sommerer
••-__i- ol..,_« MW — 2 • . . . • ' • ' ' ' •— — . • • Test results reported tn mg/liter units* otherwise noted. • •
( ' , •DETERMINATION"
010020030040050060070030090.100110120130140150160170130190
200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370
Acidity Free (CaCOa)Acidity Total (CaCOa)Al.kalinity M.O. (CaCOa)Alkalinity Pht. ICaCO3>Aluminum (AI)Ammonia (Arsenic (As) CDBarium (Ba)Bicarbonate (CaCOs) *Bio Oxygen Demand (07)Cadmium (Cd) (1) 'Calcium (Ca)Carbon Inorganic (C)Carbon Organic (C)Carbon Total (C)Carbonate (COa)Chem. Oxygen Dem. (O2>Chloride ( )Chromate (CrO4>
Chromium (Or**)Chromium Total (Cr) (1)Color (APHA)Copper (Cu) (1)Cyanide Free (CN)Cyanide Total (CN)Fluoridc (F)Hardness (CaCO3>Hydroxide (OH)tron( )(Fe)Iron Total (Fe)Lead (Pb) (1)Magnesium (Mg)Manganese (Mn)Mercury (Hg). «/l (1)Nickel (Ni) (1)Nitrate ( )Nitrite, ( . I
DATE
/' '
RICE
< 0.005
< 0.01•10020120
0.03
< 0.02
0.041
< 0.05
< 0.2 .0.68
.
.•
-
DETERMINATION*330390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560
570580590600610620630640
Nitrogen. Kjeldahl (N)Odor, Method:pH,- •Phenolic Cpds. (Phenol)Phosphorus Ortho ( 1Phosphorus Total ( 1Potassium (K)Selenium (Se) (1)Silica Soluble I )Silica Total ( )Silver (Ag) (1)Sodium (Na)Solids DissolvedSolids SuspendedSolids TotalSolids Non-SettleableSolids SettleableSolids VolatileSolvent Extract (Ofl)
Method:Sp. Cond.. 25* C pmhotSulfatel )Sulfide (S)Surfactants (M8AS)Tih(Sn)Turbidity (JTU)Zinc(Zn) (1)Miscellaneous
Antimony (Sb) (1Beryllium (Be) (1Thallium (Il').(l
DATE
«
RICE
'
0.027
< 0.005-
< 0.02
0.25
0,2< 0,02.< 0.1
-. f'~~
\ ]*-S
.
' ~
' •
• -•Special Instructions (Methods. Etc.) . . . ' .(1) .Run from filtered metal bottle. ,
P"OJ TASK MO DAY RICE.. NBR IDENT_________- . - TYPE AMOUNTiiiirnTi M10 11 12 22 - • ?5 7S
«.'. v'
— — • • ' . ' Rice Sample NflftjC 9690860__ __ Protect No. 7985.01 _______ Project Mar. Vr.^ 'CEG ______
i_J CORPORATION Date Received 9-29-79 Time' '2; 30 pmCYRUS wr*. P.CE O.V.S.ON Date Sampled ——— 9-29-79 —————— Date Reported 10-18-79 -
• .« Y- ' ' . . . , - • - ..ANALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORY
13 fwoeLC AvsMue . PITTSBURGH. PA. Ysaos' . Acid___________N B-N ______________ Pest' , • _l3-3_3-.aOO . • ' • . " ... . .
FRED C: HART ASSOCIATES, INC. VOA———!——_•—— GC/MS._____A B
Sample Source —!————————MR - 2________• ______;_____;________
acenaphthencacroleinacrylonitrilebenzenebenzidinecarbon tetrachloridechlorobenzene1.2.4-trichlorobenzenehexachlorobenzene1.2-dichloroethane1 .1 . 1 -trichloroethanehexachloroethane1.1-dichloroethane '1.1.2-trichloroethane1 .1 ,2,2-tetrachlbroethanechloroethan'ebis (chloromcthyl) etherbis (2-chloroethyl) ether2-chloroethyl vinyl etherVchloronaphthatene
x2,4.6-trichlorophenolparachlorometa cresplchloroform2-chlorophenol1.2-dichlorobenzene1.3-dichlorbben'zene1 ,4-dichlorobenzene3.3'-dichlorobenzidine1.1-dichloroethylene1,2-trans-dichloroethylene•2.4-dichlorophenol1 ,2-dichlorop; opane1,3-dichloropropylene, cis2.4-dimethylphenol2.4-dinitrotoluene2.6-dinitrotoluene1.2-diphenyUiydrazineethytbenzene
•
2
6
141
6..*1
<1"5
fluoranthene •4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether4-bromophenyl phenyl etherb!s(2-chloroisopropyl) etherbis(2-chloroethoxy) methanemethylene chloridemethyl chloridemethyl bromidebromoformdichlorobromomethanetrichlorofluoromethanedichlorodifluoromethanechlorodibromomethanehexachlorobutadienehexachlorocyclopentadieneisophorone .naphthalene •• .nitrobenzene2^tilrophenol4-nitrophenol2,4-dinitrophenol4,6-dinitro-O-cresolN-nitrosodimethylamineN-nitrosodiphenylamine,N-ni trosodi -n-pr opytaminepentachlorophenolpheoolbis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatebutyl benzyl phthalatedi-n-butyl phthalatedi-n-octyl phthalatediethyl phthalate•dimethyl phthalate •benzotalanthracenebenzo(a)pyrene3,4-benzofluoranthenebenzo(k)fluoranthenechrysene
MS/U
•
-••
-
-
• 7
-
9<12<12
-
ecenapthytehcanthracene • • -benzo(ghi)perytenefluorenephenanthrene .dibenzo(a,h)anthraceneindenoll ,2.3-cd)pyrenepyrene • 'tetrachloroethylenetoluenetrichloroethylenevinyl Chloridealdrin -dieldrinchlordane • . '• *.4.4--OOT4.4--DDE4.4--ODOa-endosulfan•endosulfanendosulfan sulfateendrinendrin aldehydeheptachlor 'heptachlor epoxideo-BHC(3-SHCT-BHC (lindane)fi-BHCPC8-1242 (Arochtor 1242)PCS-1254 (Arochtor 1254)PCB-1221 (Arochlor 122T)PCB-1232 (Arochlor 1232)PCB-1248 (Arochlor 1248)PCB-1260 (Arochlor 1260)PCB-1016 (Arochlor 1016)ToxapheneXylene
-
pg/L
i
<15 '<1
0.42
__
0.10•
0.040.92.
6Date Extracted ' Date Injected Cone. Factor." Standard ' , ' Book & Page No.ug/1
GC/MSH-N GC .
GC/MSVOA GC
GC/MSJST. GC"
2.4-D. . Silvex
2,4,5-T'
<0.501.2<0.50
,
" ' ' . ' - . ' . • ' • • ' . ' . .*-<10pg/U »*»<5pg/L m»GC/MS <« Sum of two compounds not separated by the method used
PROJ TASK MO DAY RICE NBR lOENT TYPE AMOUNT
C_H i rI • J A5 _ 5fiio|j.st* 1
A"Averi
___ . R!« Sample No. 190908 61_ ___ ___ Project No. 798S.01 Project Mar. . - C.E.G __
CORPORATOfvJ Date Received 9-29-79_______ Time 2:30 PMCVPUS WM. B.CE O.V.S.ON , Date Sampled————9-29-79—— • Date Reported———10-5-79
ANALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORY13 N>Oei.( AVeNUB • PITTSSUBGM. PA. 133O3
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED527 Madison Avenue ' NNew York, NY 10022
Attn: Dianne Sommerer
M W - 3— ' • Test results reported In mg/liter unless otherwise noted. v
DETERMINATION*01002003004005006007008009010011012013014f>150160170130190
200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370
Acidity Free (CaCOa)Acidity Total (CaCO3)Alkalinity M.O. (CaCOa)Alkalinity Pht. (CaCOa)Aluminum (ADAmmonia ( *Arsenic (As) CDBarium (Ba)Bicarbonate (CaCOa)Bio Oxygen Demand (O_)Cadmium (Cd) (1)Calcium (Ca)Carbon Inorganic (C)Carbon. Organic (C)Carbon Total (C)Carbonate (COa)Chem. Oxygen Dent. IO.)Chloride ( >Chromate (CrO
Chromium (Cr*6)Chromium Total (Cr) (1)Color (APHA)Copper (Cu) (1)Cyanide Free (CN)Cyanide Total ICN)Ftuoride IF)Hardness (CaCOa)Hydroxide (OH)Iron ( ) (Fe)Iron Total (Fe)Lead (Pb) (1)Magnesium (Mg)Manganese (Mn)Mercury (Hg). pg/1 (1)Nickel (NiJ (1)Nitrate 1 )Nitrite ( )
DATE
S
RICE
•0.016.
< 0.01
781391
< 0.02
0.16
. 0.41
.'
0.14
< 0.20.10
» .
•
.
•-
DETERMINATION*380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560^
570530590600610620630640
Nitrogen, Kj'eldahl (N)Odor. Method:pH •Phenolic Cpds. (Phenol)Phosphorus Ortho ( !Phosphorus Total ( ' IPotassium (K)Selenium (Se) (1)Silica Soluble ( )Silica Total ( )Silver (Ag) (1)Sodium (Na)Solids DissolvedSolids Suspended •Solids TotalSolids Non-SettleableSolids SettleableSolids VolatileSolvent Extract (Oil)
Method:Sp. Cond.. 25* C jjrnho*Sulfate ( . )Sulfide (S) .Surfactants (MB AS)Tin ISn)Turbidity IJTU)Zinc (Zn) (1)Miscellaneous
-
Antimony (Sb) (1Beryllium (Be) (1Thallium (Tl) {1
.-
DATE
• •
•
.
,
RICE
' -
0.036
< 0.005
< 0.02»
-
0.47
.0.3< .0.02< 0.1
_i r~s\
• • ' . , •
.
s
•Special Instructions (Methods, Etc.) • • • ''. • . -•"(1) Run from filtered metal bottle. . ^
•ROJ TASK MO DAY RICE NBR IOENT TYPE AMOUNT——————————————naur--———a i r i u n i i i i i i ^ M i i i i i i i w w min 11 • fJ
• ' ' ' ' WL-B-JS^ ^ _ _ _ • - • • • - . • . . . Rice sample N o 19090861
3£-3 - Pro>«ctNo- 7985-01 .• Project Mgr. CEG_______CORPORATION Date Received 9-29-79________ Timfirn^i .,2; 30 pm
cvsus wrvi PICE OIVIS.ON ^* *• Date Sampled _——2^29-79-——— Date Reporjed liJ(KCG)
ANALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORY » -jis MO-LC AveMue . piTTSBuPOM.^A.iaaoa Acid______________ B-N________________ Pest •
-ia.a-3-9aoo . • . .
C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC. VOA _————————;——GC/MS.
Sample.Squrce _———,———————————MW'" 3_____:_________________
acenaphtheneacrolein .acrylonitrile " 'benzene 'benzidinecarbon tetrachloridechlorobenzene1.2,4-trichlorobenzenehexachlorobenzene1 .2-dichlor oefha ne1 .1,1 -triehlorbethanehexachloroethaneT.l-dichloroethane1 ,1 ,2-triehloroet hane1 .1 ,2.2-tetrachloroethanechloroethan'ebis (chloromethyl) etherbis (2-chloroethyl) ether"••ehloroethyl vinyl etherIhloronaphthalene
T-^.e-trichlorcphenolparachlorometa cresolchloroform2-chlorophenol1 .2-dichlorobenzene1.3-dichlorobenzene1 ,4 -dichlorobeniene
" 3.3'-diehtorobenzidineIJ-dichloroethylene1.2-trans-dichloroethylene2.4-dichtorophenol1, 2-dichlor opropane1.3-dichloropropylene2.4-dimeihy'lphenol2.4-dinitrotoluene2.6-dinitiotoluene1.2-diphenylhydrazineethylbenzene
xg/L
•
>g/L1
38
3
21. -
.5
6
fluoranthene .4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether4-brornopheny) phenyl etherbis(2-chloroisopropyl) etherbis(2-chloroethoxy) methanemethylene chloridemethyl chloridemethyl bromidebromoformdichlorobromomethane ' •vichtorofluoromethanediehlorodifluoromethanechlorodibromomethanehexachlorobuiadienehexachlorocyclopentadieneisophoronenaphthalene - •nitrobenzene2-nitrophenol4-nitrophenot2,4-dinitrophenot4.6-dTnitro-o-crejolN-nitrosodimethylamineN-nifrosodiphenylamineN-'nitrosodi-n-propylaminepentachlorophenolphenol . 'bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatebutyl benzyl phthalatedi-n-butyl phthalatedi-n-octyl phthalatedi ethyl phthalatedimethyl phthalatebenzotalanthracene'benzo(a)pyrene3,4-benzofluoranthenebenzolklfluoranthenechrysene.
P9/L
,-
•
M9/L
9
\
251273
acenapthylene ^anthracene . •' 'benzolghilperylenefluorenephenanthrene , •••diben2o(a,h)anthraceneindenod ,2.3-cd)pvrenepyrene 'tetrachloroethylenetoluenetrichloroethylenevinyl chlorideatdrindieldrinchlordane4.4--DDT4.4--OOE4.4<-ODOa-endosulfan/!-endosulfanendosulfan sulfateendrinendrin aldehydeheptachlorheptachlor epoxide .o-BHCfl-BHCT-BHC (lindane)4-8 HCPCB-t 242 (Arochlor 1242)PCB-1254 (Arochlor 1254)PCB-1221 (Arochlor 1221)PCB-1232 (Arochlor 1232)PCB-1 248 (Arochlor 1248)PCB-1 260 (Arochlor 1 2601PCS-1016 (Arochlor 1016)ToxapheneXylene
xg/L
.
*g/L<1«1
<1•Si
8<1
«0.01<0.01
0.02
<0.01
0.07«0.02<0.010.03£0.02. 0.04«0. 01
0.20(
0.19
7Date Extracted Date Injected Cone. Factor - Standard • ' Book & Page No,
ug/1GC/MS 2,4-D
S.M GC SilvexGC/MS 2
«OA GCGC/MS
V >. GC '• -.. '• • • •- • .:
,4,5-T
3<0<0
X
.1
.05
.50
•*<10>ig/-. ' •••<Sjjfl/L mmGC/MS <• /Sum of two compounds not separated by the 'method used A'Avetage
PROJ v TASK MO DAY RICE ;NBR (DENT Z f\ i nrfYf^ AMOUNT v
:]_. ! ! .1 "A?* 1 1 i i •
... • ' . ' - WL-2-78——— • . Rice Sample No. 19090862
Project No..______7985.01 Project Mar. C.E.G ___________Date Received____2z29z79______ Tim- 2:30 PM
p.ce DIVISION Date Sampled———9-29-79————;— Data Reported 10-SM?9ANALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORY . ' '' •
13 MO»ue AveMue • PITTSBURGH. PA. 15303 .-ia-3-3-aaoo • • . . • . . . . •• ., J
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED . _^~^527 Madison Avenue ,New York, NY / 10022 . , • '
Attn: Dianne Sommerer• , • ' . ' • • . . \ ' ' . ". . • •
c>.__i. <•_..... MW — 4. • • • . . V— Test results reported in mg/liter unless otherwise noted. '
DETERMINATION*010020030040050060070030090100110120130140150160170180190
200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370
Acidity Free (CaCOa)Acidity Total (CaCOa)Al.kalinity M.O. (CaCOa)Alkalinity Pht. (CaCOa)Aluminum (AI)Ammonia ( -Arsenic (As) CDBarium (Ba).Bicarbonate (CaCOa)Bio Oxygen Demand (Oj)Cadmium (Cd) (1)Calcium (Ca) .Carbon Inorganic (C)Carbon Organic (C)Carbon Total (CLCarbonate (COa) •Chem. Oxygen Dem. (Oj)Chloride ( >Chromate (CrO4>Chromium (Cr*6)Chromium Total (Cr) (1)Color (APHA)Copper (Cu) (1)Cyanide Free (CN)Cyanide Total (CN)Fluoride (F)Hardness (CaCOa)Hydroxide (OH)Iron ( ) (Fe)Iron Total (Fe)Lead(Pb) (1)Magnesium (Mg)Manganese (Mn)Mercury (Hg). pg/1 (1)Nickel (Ni) (1)Nitrate I )Nitrite ( )
DATE
^
RICE.
< 0.04
0.07
75605680
0.15.
1.3
0.024**
0.21
< 0.22.9
.
•
DETERMINATION*380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560f
570580590600610620630640
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl (N)Odor, Method: .PH •Phenolic Cpds. (Phenol)Phosphorus Ortho ( 1Phosphorus Total ( !Potassium (K)Selenium (Se) (1)Silica Soluble ( )Silica Total ( )Silver (Ag) (1)Sodium (Na)Solids DissolvedSolids SuspendedSolids TotalSolids Non-SettleabteSolids SettleableSolids VolatileSolvent Extract (Oil)
Method:Sp. Cond., 25* C MmhosSulfate ( . )Sulfide (S)Surfactants (MBAS)Tin (Sn)Turbidity (JTU)Zinc(Zn) (1)Miscellaneous
Antimony (Sb) (1Beryllium (Be) (1Thallium (Tl) (1
'.
DATE
%
- •'-
RICE
*
25.6
.< 0.04•
0.06
. ,
9.4
0.9•O.120.3
__i ;\ — /"
•
!
'.
-
/
•Special Instructions (Methods. Etc.)(1) Run from filtered metal bottle.
oo<jj TASK MO DAY RICH NBR IOENT TYPE AMOUNTjnnnin 11 \t -n - ?«j •»«
.-,««« «, Sample No. __19Q90862
Protect No. 7985.01- Project Mor. ••- .-CEGCXDRPORATOXJ . Date Received 9-29-79_______ Time 2; 30 pm
cv«us WN* PICE DIVISION . <T Dat« Sampled ———9-29-79 '——— Date Reported 10-18-79.ANALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORY .
~ 13 Noaue AWCMU.E . PITTSBURGH. PA.'isaos ' Add ______________ B-N_______________ Pest-ia-3-3-«soo . . . . . .
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC. VOA _J———————————GC/MS A _____(
. . ' MW - 4 • . • " .Sample Source
V
acenaphtheneacrolcin • -acrylonitritebenzenebenzidinecarbon tetrachloridechlorobenzene1.2.4-trichlorobenzenehexachlorobenzene1,2-dichtoroethane1,1 ,1 -trichloroethanehexachloroethane1.1'dichloroethane1 .1 ,2-trichloroet hane1 ,1 ,2,2-tetrachloroethanechloroethaneb's (chloromethyl) etherbis (2-chloroethyl) ether2-chloroethyl vinyl ether•chloronaphthatcne
.4.6-trichlorcphenolparachlororneta cresol'chloroform2-chlorophenol1.2-dichlorobenzene1 ,3-dichlorobenzene1 ,4<jichloroben7ene3,3'-dichloroben zidi ne1 .1 -dichloroethy lene1.2-trans-dichloroethylene2.4-dichlorophenol .1. 2-dichlor opropane1 ,3-dichloropropy lene2,4-dimethylphenol2.4-diniuotoluene •2.6-dinitrotoluene1 ,2-di phenyl hydrazineeihylbenzene
»S/\-
•
PS/l-
48. OOC
71
2
166317041
220
270
,
300
fluoranthene4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether4-bromophenyl phenyl etherbis(2-chloroisopropyl) etherbis(2-chloroethoxy) methanemethylene chloridemethyl chloridemethyl bromidebromoformdichlorobromo methanetrichlorofluoromethanedichlorodifluoromethanechlorodibromo methanehexachlorobutadienehexachloro.cyclopentadieneisophoronenaphthalene -nitrobenzene'2-nitrophenol4-nitrophenol2.4-dinitrophenol4.6-dfnitro-o<resolN-nitroiOdimethylamineN-nitrosodiphenylamineN-nitrosodi-n-propylaminepentachlorophenolphenolbis(2-«ihylhexyl) phthalatebutyl benzyl phthalatedi-n-butyl phthalatedi-n-octyl phthalatedi ethyl phthalatedimethyl phthalatebenzolajanthracenebenzolalpyrene3,4-benzofluoranthenebenzo(k)fluoranthenechrysene
pg/L
t
i
PS/L
20
• (
«3
^8 •
110690
2300189^3230
acenapthyleneanthracenebenzo (ghi)perylenefluorenephenanthrenedibenzola.hlanthraceneindenoll ,2,3-cd)pyrenepyrenetetrachloroethylenetoluenetrichloroethylenevinyl chloridealdrindieldrinchlordane • . '•'.4.4--OOT4.4--DDE4.4--ODDa-endosulfanf-endosulfanendosulfan sulfateendrinendrin aldehyde .heptachlorheptachlor epoxidea-BHC . .0-BHCT-BHC (lindane)S-BHCPCB-1 242 (Arochlor 12421PCB-1 254 (Arochlor 1254)PCB-1221 (Arochlor 1221)PCB-1 232 (Arochlor 1232)PCB-1 248 (Arochlor 1 248)PCB-1 260 (Arochlor 1260)PCS-1016 (Arochlor 10161ToxapheneXylene
pg/L
f
• •
pg/L
<1
620037
<:8
1.8
. 0.2<0.08
1060
AGIOG
B-NG
VOAG
*-<10
PROJ
Dale Extracted Pate Injected Cone. Factor ' •»Kf.
C/MSGC ' .
C/MS - . - . ' •G C - - - • - •
C/MSGC
Standard , Book & Page No.ug/1
2,4-D 1,140Silvex <0.052,4,5-T <0.50
liglL . . ••*<5P9/L m«GC/MS <• Sum of two compounds not separated by the method used A«Averag«
TASK MO DAY RICE NBR IDENT • TYPE AMOUNT v.
U L _!> xJi1 "A
• WL-2-78
- —— Rice Sample No. - 19090-863_ ___ ___ . Project No. 7985.01 _______ Project Mar. C.'E.G ________
CORPORATION ". Date Received 9-29-79 _______ Time.. 2:30 PM _____CYPUS WM. WICH orvisor-j Dat» Sampled ———— 9-29-79 —————— Date Reported V 10-5-79
ANALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORY13 NOB.* Ayeiwo« • PITTSBOPOH. PA. isaoa
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED527 Madison Avenue .New York, NY . 10022
Attn: Dianne Sommerer
SarripteS MW-5
DETERMINATION*010020030040050060070080090100110120130140150160170180190
200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350350370
Acidity Free (CaCOa)Acidity Total (CaCOa)Alkalinity M.O. (CaCOa)Alkalinity Pht. {CaCOa)Aluminum (AI)Ammonia <Arsenic (As) (1)Barium (Ba)Bicarbonate (CaCOa)3io Oxygen Demand (Oj)Cadmium (Cd) (1)Calcium (Ca)Carbon Inorganic (C)Carbon Organic (C)Carbon Total (C)Carbonate (COa)Chem. Oxygen Dem. (03)Chloride f ' )Chr ornate (004)
Chromium (Cr*8)Chromium Total (Cr) (1)Color (APHA)Copper (Cu) (1)Cyanide Free (CN)Cyanide Total (CN)Ftuoride (F)Hardness (CaCOa)Hydroxide (OH)Iron! KFelIron Total (Fe)Lead (Pb) (1)Magnesium (Mg)Manganese (Mn)Mercury (Hg), jjg/1 (1)Nickel (Ni) (1)Nitrate ( )Nitrite ( )
DATE .
Test results reported in mg/liter unless otherwise noted.
RICE
0.033
< 0.01
10080180
0.03
0.43
0.039
'
0.41
< 0.20.26
v
'
— .
DETERMINATION*330390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560
570530590600610620630540
Nitrogen. Kjeldahl.(N)Odor, Method:PH •Phenolic Cpds. (Phenol)Phosphorus Ortho { ]Phosphorus Total ( 1Potassium (K)Selenium (Se) (1)Silica Soluble ( )Silica Total I )Silver (Ag) (1)Sodium (Na)Solids DissolvedSolids SuspendedSolids TotalSolids Non-SettteableSolids SettleableSolids VolatileSolvent Extract (Oil)
Method:Sp. Cond., 25*C jifnhosSulfate ( • . )Sulfide IS}Surfactants (MBAS)Tin (Sn)Turbidity (JTU)Zinc(Zn) (1)Miscellaneous
Antimony (Sb) (1Beryllium (Be) (1Thallium (Tl) (1
DATE•
• .
RICE
*
0.958
« 0.005•
< 0.02
^
0.91
0.3O.P2.o.l.
A
-
•
'
•Special Instruction* (Methods, Etc.)(1) Run from filtered metal bottla.
TASK MO DAY RICE NBR IOENT________________' - JY?g/> . AMOUNTnxnu A10in 11 1? -n
——— - , - ' ; • • Rice Sample No. 19090863 j""___ Project No. -7985.01 _____ Project Mor. : CEG; H . vj 4 >-»-<_.'' -mmm , « S 7 J z f _ — — — — — — — — — •> s —————-—-——————————
I CORPORATION Date Received____f_±f_Zf_______ Time 2; 30 pmcv«us WM. BICE.oivisioN . • .'. • Date Sampled———9-29-79 ——'.—. D«tt feeaeMd--.^ 10-18-79
'VIMALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORYis ivoeu* Averwue . PITTSBUBGM. PA. isaos Acid———————————————B-N___' __________ Pest
. . -ia-3-3-SSOO . • ' •
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC. VOA ___—————:_______ GC/MS
( ' . MW - 5 'Sample Source.
^
•cenaphtheneacrolein • ' • ' . ' •acrylonitrile 'benzenebenzidinccarbon tetrachloridechlorobenzene1.2,4-trichlorobenzenehexachlorobenzene1,2-dichloroethane1.1,1-trichloroethanehexachloroethane1,1-dichloroethane1,1,2-trichloroethane1.1.2.2-tetrachloroethanechloroethanebis (chloromethyl) etherbis (2-chloroethyl) ether•'•chloroethyl vinyl ether .
filoronaphthalener-^.e-trichlorophenolparachtorometa cresolchloroform2-chlorbphenol, (4-C14) -1,2-dichlorobenzene1.3-dichlorobenzene1,4-dichlorobeniene3.3'-di c htoroberizidi nc1,1-.dichloroethylene1 ,2-trans-diehloroethylene2.4-dichlorophenol1,2-dichloropropane1.3-dichloropropylene2.4-dimeihylphenol2.4-dinitrotoluene2.6-dinitrotoluene1.2-diphenylhydrazineel hy (benzene
»9/L.
(94)
PS/-
1530
5
22
151
9
29
4
25
fluoranthene•4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether4-bromophenyl phenyt etherbis(2-chloroisopropyl) etherbis(2-chloroethbxy) methanemethylene chloridemethyl chloridemethyl bromidebromoformdichlorobromomethanetriehlorofluoromethanedi chlorodifl uorome thanechlorodibromometrujnehexaehtorobutadienehexachlorocyclopentadieneisophoronenaphthalenenitrobenzene2-nitrophenol4-nitrophenol2.4-dinitrophenol4,6-dfnitro-o cresolN-nitrosodimethylamineN-nitrosodi pheny lami neN-nitrosodi-n-propylaminepentachlorophenolphenolbis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatebutyl benzyl 0hthalatcdi-n-butyl phthalatedi-n-oetyl phthalatediethyl phthalate.dimethyl phthalatebenzolalanthracenebenzo(a)pyrene3,4-benzof luoranthenebenzo(k)fluoranthenechrysene
«/L Mg/L
6
-
<128
12275
928
<13
360
acenapthyleneanthracenebenzo(ghi)perylenefluorene ,phenanthrene ' 'dibenzo'(a.h)anthraceneindenod ,2.3-cd)pyrene • .pyrene •tetrachloroethylenetoluenetrichloroethylenevinyl chloridealdrindieldrinchlordane •.4.4--DOT4.4'.DOE4.4'-DODa-endosulfan/I-endosulfanendosulfan sulfateendrinendrin aldehydeheptachlorheptachlor eppxidea-BHCfl-BHC •T-BHC (lindane)4-BHCPCB-1 242 (Arochlor 1242)PCB-1 254 (Arochlor 1254)PCS-1221 (Arochlor 1221)PCB-1232 (Arochlor 1232)PCB-1 248 (Arochlor 1248)PCS-1260 (Arochtor 1260)PCB-1016 (Arochlor 1016)ToxapheneXylene
Mg/L
••.
-
P9/L
<1 1
1
,'
0.03
•
0.05
. 0.02•c-0.03
0.64
.0. 54
11Dale Extracted Date Injected - Cone. Factor » , ' Standard ' Book & Page No.
^ n o « r - . - - . . . . • . . . . • - . : • ug/1CC/MS
R.N GC
GC/MS • -VOA GC
GC/MS
2,4-DSilvex
' 2,4,5-T, ' •• • • • -.
- - r ' . , • ' .
418.31.5
J. GC ' -• . . • ' ' ' '• '
»-<10j»g/L. • •*"<5jig/L m«GC/MS <- Sum of two compound's not separated by the method used
PROJ TASK MO DAY RICE NBR IOENT - TYPE AMOUNT
j~ |7' ;JL- r,11, [Mziffi rA'Average
•11 19 -M . 7S ?K 33 -3«» 47 SO
- . • WL-2-73
-—— Rice Sample No. 19090864__ ___ ___ Project Na. 7985.01 Project Mor. C.E..G_______
CORPORATION Date Received 9-29-79 Time 2; 30 PM_____CVPHJSWIV.B.CSOIV.SION ' Date Sampled • 9-29-79————.—— Date Reported 10-5-79^______
ANALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORY . . ' . . - ' -13 iMoau. AVB»JU« • «TTsau«GK »A. isaos . - ' • . ' ,
• '.. _ta-3-3-aaoo . ' . ; ' • * . • ' • . ' \
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED , ^"^527 Madison Avenue , , .New York, NY ( 10022 • •
Attn: Dianne Sommerer . .
«•__i_ o~i..__ . MW — 6 " . . " . -
DETERMINATION*010020030040050060070080090100110120130140150ISO170180190
200210220230240250260270230290300310320330340350360370
Acidity Free (CaCOa)Acidity Total ICaCO3)Al.kalinity M.O. (CaCOa)Alkalinity Pht. (CaCO3)Aluminum (Al)Ammonia 1Arsenic (As) CDBarium (8a)Bicarbonate (CaCOa)Bio Oxygen Demand (0_)Cadmium (Cd) (1)Calcium (Ca)Carbon Inorganic (C)Carbon Organic (C)Carbon Total (C)Carbonate (COa)Chem. Oxygen Oem, (Oj)
Chloride ( ' )Chromate (CrO4)Chromium (Cr*6)Chromium Total (Cr) (1)Color (APHA)Copper (Cu) (1)Cyanide Free (CN)Cyanide Total (CN)Fluoride (F)Hardness (CaCOa)Hydroxide (OH)Iron < ) (Fe)Iron Total (Fe)Lead(Pb) (1)Magnesium (Mg)Manganese (Mn)Mercury (Hg). pg/1 (1)Nickel (Ni) (1)Nitrate < - )Nitrite C )
DATE
•
*
Test results reported in mg/liter unless otherwise noted.
RICE
0.014
' ..
< 0.01
9024114
< 0.02 .
0.43
0.049
0.18
< 0.20.20
/
• - \
DETERMINATION*380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560*
570580590600610620S30640
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl (N)Odor, Method:pH •Phenolic Cpds. (Phenol)Phosphorus Onho ( 1Phosphorus Total ( ]Potassium IK) •Selenium (Se). (1)Silica Soluble ( )Silica Total ( ISilver (Agl (1)Sodium (Na)Solids DissolvedSolids SuspendedSolids TotalSolids Non-Settleable .Solids Settleable •Solids Volatile ' •Solvent Extract (Oil)
Method:Sp. Cond.. 25* C MmhosSulfate ( |Sulfide (S)Surfactants (MB AS)Tin (Sn) -Turbidity (JTU)Zine(Zn). (1)Miscellaneous
Antimony (Sb) (1Beryllium (Be) (1Thallium (Tl) (1
-j
DATE
*••
,
\•
RICE
* .
0.012
< 0.005
< 0.02
0.41
0,3•S 0.020.1
• . .
.
v ;v x
•Special Instructions (Methods, Etc.) • ~ . '.(1) Run from filtered metal bottle. . , i
PROJ TASK MO DAY RICE NBR IOENT TYPE AMOUNT 7
1 1 1 1 B - A 1 2, . . f? 1 )0,Kll
——— • - Rice Sample No. ___19090864_Project No. 7985.01 Project Mar. CEGDate Received 9-29-79 , fjfheC! fn|2:30 pm
. CVPUS wrvi. pee O.V.S.ON ,., Date Sampled———9-29-79 ————— Date Report*^ ,, 10-18-79AIM ALYTICAL-SERVICES LABORATORY ?:
NOBLE AveMue . >.TTsau»GK PA. isaos Acid__________' B-tM • _____. Pest-1S-3-3-93OO ' . - • , - . ;
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC. V°A—————;————_—GC/MS.
Sample Source ______'-.——.——— " 6 ______i______
;•
V,
acenaphtheneacrolein • •acrylonitrilebenzenebenzidinecarbon teuachloridechlorobenzenc1,2.4-ir.ichlorobenzenehexachlorobenzene1.2-dichloroethane1,1 ,1 -trichloroethanehexachloroethane1,1-dichloroethane1,1,2-trjchloroethane1.1,2,2-tetrachloroethanechloroethanebis .(chloromethyl) etherbis (2-chloroethyl) ether2-chloroethyl vinyl etherchloronaphthalene
_^,4,6-trichlorophenolparaehtorometa cresolchloroform2-chlorophenol1 ,2-dichlorobenzene1,3-dichlorobenzene1,4-dichlorobenzene •3,3'-d!chlorobenzidine1,1-dichloroethylene .1,2-trans-dichloroethylene2,4-dichlorophenol1.2-dichloropropane1,3-dichloropropylene ,cis2,4-dimethylphenol2.4-dinitroioluene2.6-dinitrotoluene1 ,2-di phenylhydrazineethylbenzene
pg/L
. . •
"
pg/L
3
<1
•
1
! . •
3
2
fluoranthene4-chlofOphenyl phenyl ether4-bromophenyl phenyl etherbis(2-chloroitopropyl) etherbis(2-chloroethoxy) methanemethylene chloridemethyl chloridemethyl bromidebromoformdichlorobromo methanetrichlorofluoromethanedichlorodifluoromethanechlorodibrorttomethanehexachlorobutadienehexachlorocyclopehtadieneisophoronenaphthalenenitrobenzene2-nitrophenol4-nitrophenol . .2.4-dinitrophenol4,6-drniuo-o-cresolN-nitrosodimethylamineN-nitrosodiphenylam!neN-nitrosodi-n-propylamincpentachlorophenolphenolbis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatebutyl benzyl phthalatedi-n-butyl phthalatedi-n-octyl phthalatediethyl phthalatedimethyl phthalatebenzo (a )a nt hracenebenzolalpyrene3,4-benzofluoranthehebenzo (k)fluoranthenechrysene
P9/L
>
W3/L
..
acenapthyleneanthracenebenzo (ghi)perylenefluorenephenanthrenedibenzo(a,h)anthraceneindenoll ,2.3-cdlpyrenepyrenctetrachloroethylenetolueneIrichloroethylene 'vinyl chloridealdrindieldrinchlordane • . *•*.4.4--DDT4,4'.DOE4.4--ODOa-endosulfan/!-endosulfanendosulfan sulfateendrinendrin aldehydeheptachlorheptachlor epoxidea-BHC^-BHCT-BHC (lindahe)«-BHCPCB-1 242 (Arochlor 1242)PCB-1 254 (Arochlor 1254)PCB-1221 (Arochlor 1221)PCB-1 232 (Arochlor 1232)PCS-1248 (Arochtor 1248)PCB-1 260 (Arochlor 1260)PCB-1016 (Arochlor 1016)ToxapheneXylene
pg/L
. ,
P9/L
5 ;
~
Date Extracted Date Injected Cone. Factor »ACin GC ', ,„..,, ' ' _ ———— • ..,!,.,.,, , , ; ,
GC/MSB-N GC
GC/MS .VOA GC
GC/MS ,
Standard . ' ' Book & Page No.
- .
— ^ . • . . . - . . ' . . . . • . . .
••<10pg/L *«m<5pg/L m"GC/MS . <- Sum of two compounds not separated by the method used A-Averagi
PROJ TASK MO DAY RICE NBR IDENT TYPE AMOUNT 7
I. 1 I LA13^ .in 11 i-> -M. •»* •>« , • 71 !«; .
iRili[202_L47. «« . «4 . SR . -^ 63
•.VL 4 73
Rice Sample No.'-F-U yi.V'.«y«__tf Project No. ..———Z985'01———._——— Project Mor. CEGI J CO ^-ORATION Date Received 9-29- 79 Tim.-.' s'3; Q pm
r-i~*.K c?~_u.~i«.d *i~ 3"~ f3 n_~_ B-~.~_*~CYPUS WA/1 RiCE DIVISION
ANALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORY13 IMOSLE AVEMUC * fiTTSauOGM. PA 13_O9
Date Sampled 9-29-79 Date ReOQrtedVV-iQ-25-79 I
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, .INC. - : ~ " ^' 527 Madison Avenue . . •New York, NY 10022 . -T
ATTN: Dianne Sommerer
5flmni. s«,,rr. Ohio River Park, Neville Island
Test results reported in mg/liter unless otherwise noted.
RiceSampleNo.
19090859
1909b8v60
19090861
19090862
19090863
19090864
Sample Source pH
MW-1 '• ' ' ' " ' 6.3. ' • • . . " - • - '
MW-2 7.2
MW-3 6.8
MW-4 • ' .' '••' 3.5 . ... . . '
MW-5 . ' " . . , ••'.•• 6.3 ' ' • ' • ' . • •1 • s
MW-6 6 . 9 . • . ' . • ' •
' " ' . ' '. • .' ' ' / • • ; ' ' - ^
\ ' . ' "
* ' - ' ,
J
sPROJ TASK MO DAY RICE NBR IOENT ______ TYPE AMOUNTnm w 1-1.2 C
10 11 12 22- 25 26 33 35 47 50 54 56 63
• . . - . ' • • , . . - . . .
f '" RS. Pfl' PF"**' —— — ' * Rice Sample No. l»10tQ6i-U' ' • ' ' ' .Project. N o . 7985.01 __________ Project Mor. CE«"^JT ••
I J J_ _
CCJM- f oFlATlON Date Received 10-26-79 . Time 12 ; 30 PMwrvi.R.ce OIVISHDIM Date Sampled 10-26-79 ________ Date ReOQrted ll-S-79
•ALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORY13 Nosic AveMoe * PITTSBURGH. PA. isaos
-1S-3-3-SSOO
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC.527 Madison AvenueNew York, NY 10022
Attention: Diarine Sommerer
Storm Sewer outfall (upstream) Sampled by Alfred Tuttle
DETERMINATION*010020030040050060070080090100110120130,140150160170160190
200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370
Acidity Free (CaCOa)Acidity Total (CaCOa)Alkalinity M.O. ICaCOa)Alkalinity Pht. (CaCOa)Aluminum (AI)
Ammonia ( 1Arsenic (As)Barium (Ba)Bicarbonate (CaCOs)Bio Oxygen Demand (O2>Cadmium (Cd)Calcium (Ca)Carbon Inorganic (C)Carbon Organic (C)Carbon Total (C)Carbonate (CO 3}Chem. Oxygen Oem. (O2>CMoride I )Chromate (CrO4>
Chromium (Cr*6)Chromium Total (Cr)Color (APHA)Copper ICu)Cyanide Free (CM)Cyanide Total ICN)Flubride (F)Hardness (CaCOa)Hydroxide (OH)lron( XFe)Iron Total (Fe)Lead IPb)Magnesium (Mg)Manganese (Mn)Mercury (Hg). pg/1Nickel (Ni)Nitrate I )Nitrite ( I
DATE
• .
A
Test results reported in mg/liter unless otherwise noted.
RICE
0.005
.< 0.01
24
1
0.04
0.04
< 0.001,
'< 0.05
0.70.08
-
' .
-
DETERMINATION*380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520G30540550560
570580590600610620630640
Nitrogen. Kjeldahl (N)Odor, Method:PHPhenolic Cpds. (Phenol)Phosphorus Ortho < )Phosphorus Total ( )Potassium (KJSelenium (Sc)Silica Soluble ( • )Silica Total ( )Silver (Ag)Sodium (Na)Solids DissolvedSolids SuspendedSolids TotalSolids Non-SettleableSolids SettleableSolids VolatileSolvent Extract (Oil)
Method:Sp. Cond.. 25* C pmhosSulfate { )Sulfide (S)Surfactants (MB AS)Tin (Sn)Turbidity (JTU)Zinc (Zn)MiscellaneousJ\p^i mnnvr /CViJ
p«»Y-yll^"m (**°)ThalHirm (Tl)
DATE
-
-
•.
.
RICE
11.50.004
-
0.006•
< 0.02
. .
•
335
. -
. 0.04
< 0.1< 0.02< 0.1
. .: i]
" •
;-
•
'Special Instructions (Methods, Etc.)* Interference (sulfide)
PROJ TASK MO DAY RICE NBR IDENT TYPE AMOUNT n
Rice Sample No. 19101062Project No. 7985.01 . Project Mgr..
CORPORATION -• Date Received 10-26-79______ Time 12; 30 PMWM. P-C6 O.V.S.ON DateSampled ————10^26-79—————— Oate Reported _:———11+5.-79
ANALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORYis rvoaLC AV««JU« > PITTSBURGH. PA, isaos ' Acid——————————:_ll___, B-N———————;__________ Pest
FRED C. .HART ASSOCIATES, INC. VOA——1——;——<___£___ GC/MS————^__A______l- . , ^ . . •
Sample Source Storm Sewer outfall (upstream) '•."•' ." v - Sampled by Alfred Tuttle
acenaphtheneacroleinacrylonitrile •benzenebenzidinecarbon tetrachtoridechlorobenzene1,2,4-uichlorobenzenehexachlorobenzent1 ,2-dichloroet hane1 ,1,1 -trichloroethanehexachloroethane1.1-dichtoroethane1 .1 ,2-trichloroet hane1 , 1 .2.2-tetrachloi oet hanechloroethanebi> (chloromethyl) etherbis (2-chloroethyl) ether2-chloroethyl vinyl ettier2-chloronaphthalene2.4.6-trichlorcphenolparachlorometa cresolchloroform2-chlorophenol - . ...1,2-dichlorobenzene ~ .1,3-dichlorobenzene - -1,4-dichlorobenzene3,3'-dichlorobenzidine1,1 -dichtoroethylene1.2-tranj-diehloroethylene2.4-dichlorophenol1 ,2-dichloropropane1,3-dichtoropropylene2.4-d!methylphenol2,4-dinitrotoluene2.6-diniuotoluene1.2-diphenylhydrazineethylbenzcne
P9/L
•
.
,
•
•
"
pg/L^T —
— I —
.
23
< 1"6
180
< 1
< 1
fluoranthene ~ '4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether4-bromophenyl phenyl etherbis(2-chloroisopropyl) etberbis(2-chloroethoxy) methanemethylene chloridemethyl chloride .methyl bromidebromoformdichlorobromo methanetrichlorofluoromethan.dichlorodifluoromethanichlorodibromomethanehexachlorobutadienehexaehlorocyclopeniadiene •isophorohenaphthalene .nitrobenzene2-nitrophenol.4-nitrophenol2.4-dinitrophenol4,6-dinitro-o<resol .N-nitrosodimethylamineN-nitrosodrphenylamineN-nitrosodi-n-propylaminepentachlorophenolphenolbis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate •butyl benzyl phthalatedi-n-butyl phthalatedi-n-octyl phthalatedi ethyl phthalatedimethyl phthalatebenzo (a)anthracenebenzo(a)pyrene3,4-benzofluoranthenebenzo(k)fluoranthenechrysene
pg/L
-
(Sat)
*
pg/L.
P'SOO*
19
220
1029
. ' .. '
acenapthyleneanthracene 'benzo (ghi)perylenefluorene'phenanthrenedibenzola.hlanthraceneindenoll ,2.3<d)pyrenepyrenetetrachloroethylene •toluenetrichloroethylenevinyl chloride ' ' - 'aldrin . • 'dieldrinchlordane .. , '. '. '4.4--DDT -4,4'-DOE4.4' -ODDa-endosulfan0-endosulfan -endosulfan sulfateendrinendrin aldehydeheptachlorheptachlor epoxidea-BHC0-BHCT-8HC (lindane)S-BHCPCB-1 242 (Arochlor 1242)PCB-1 254 (Arochlor 1254)PCS-1221 (Arochlor 1221)PCS-1232 (Arochlor 1232)PCS-1248 (Arochlor 12481PC B- 1260 (Arochlor 1260)PCS-1016 (Arochtor 1016)ToxapheneXylene
pg/L.
pg/L
<1•< itl
<1
• •
x /
t
• ,' ' -
Oate ExtractedAGIO GC . . _
RC/MS 10-26-79B.N GC
GC/MS 10-26-79
Oate Injected Cone. Factor - Standard .
10-30-79 1000 Consent Decree
10-29-79 1000 Consent Decree
. •' Book & Page No.
32-79-1• -
26-79-47vr»A ' -t* Sample from ACHD. bottle - rinsed with methylene chloride •
GC/MS 10-26-79 1.0, 0.1 Consent Decree 26-79-44PEST. GC 10-26-79- • t
• • ' . • ^—*• •<lOps/L, **-<5,pg/L . m-GC/MS <• Sum of two compounds not separated by the method used , A-Average
PROJ TASK MO DAY RICE N8R IDENT ' ; TYPE AMOUNT -f
m '__ __ __ _ ] __ __ i __ _ _ • • 1 • Jl itiikL____10 11 12 22 • 25 25 33 35 47 SO . " *S4 58. 63
-''•:'•• . . - %:• ' ' • • . . . . . sI I I: H\ m P&- » ——- . ^ • Rice Sample No. 19101061! ' r- If ••[,\J'JJ&- | • . Project No. 7985.01 Project Mgr CEG , . " "
. Date Received 10-26-79____________ - -~ --~--—— -cvous WM BICE DIVISION ... Date Sampled—10-26-r79—;————__ 0ate
ANALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORY ,' . :.(&•!»$• '" '. *a Moeue AvEivue . PITTSBU»GW. PA. isaos :~. ' '
_13-3-3-S9OO .-.
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC. - - ' \527 Madison Avenue ' ^ '.'.'„''' 'New York, NY 10022 ^
Attention: Dianne Sonunerer • . . . . - ' '
Pond Water Sampled by Alfred Tuttle• . Test result? reported in mg/liter
DETERMINATION*010020030040050060070080090100110120130140
150160170180190
200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370
Acidity Free (CaCOa)Acidity Total (CaCOa)Alkalinity M.O. (CaCOa)Alkalinity Pht. (CaCOa)Aluminum (AI)Ammonia ( • 1Arsenic (As)Barium (B*lBicarbonate (CaCOa)Bio Oxygen Demand <O_}Cadmium (Cd)Calcium (Ca)Carbon Inorganic (C) 'Carbon Organic (ClCarbon Total (C)Carbonate (COa)Chem. Oxygen Dem. (O_)
Chloride I )Chronwte (CrO4)
Chromium (Cr*6)Chromium Total (Cr)Color (APHA)Copper (Cu)Cyanide Free (CN)Cyanide Total (CN)Fluoride (F)Hardness (CaCOa)Hydroxide (OH)
Iron < ) (Fe)Iron Total (PelLead (Pb)Magnesium (Mg)Manganese (Mn)Mercury (Hg). yg/1Nickel (Ni)Nitrate < )Nitrite ( )
DATE
j *
RICE
. .
< 0 005
< 0.01
50
< 0.02
0.05
0.003
< 0.05
•? 0.20.02
• .
1
.• ' .
--
unleu otherwise noted. .
DETERMINATION*380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520C30540550560
570580590600610620630640
Nitrogen, Kjeldaht IN)Odor, Method:PHPhenolic Cods. (Phenol)Phosphorus On ho ( IPhosphorus Total ( . )Potassium IK)Selenium (Se)Silica Soluble < - >Silica Total I )Silver (Ag)Sodium (Na) •Solids DissolvedSolids SuspendedSolids TotalSolids Non-SettleableSolids SettleableSolids VolatileSolvent Extract (Oil)
Method:Sp. Cond.. 25* C umhosSulfate ( - )Sulfide (S)Surfactants (MB AS)Tin (Sn)Turbidity (JTUIZinc(Zn)MiscellaneousUnt-inwsnv (c;K)RoT-yllinm ("«)Thai \ijTm (Tl )
- *
OATE
- *
• :. •
'-,
. ,
RICE
6.80.027
< 0.005
< 0.02
5.5
- • .,
0.90
< 0.1< 0.02< 0.1
• *
•Special Instructions (Methods, Etc.)N •
PROJ TASK MO DAY RICE N(8R IDENT TYPE AMOUNT v
i . 1 JA17- A R 1 )12o|e S I I
, ' •' . . • . •'• - s :s» ,-• rr-v rn rr-«a -—— Rice Sample No. 19101061!- d^JiP J£3 Project No. ' 7985.01 • Project M9r. CEG ___
Dale Received 10-26-79 Time '•-•'• 12-30- PM
CvnuS wivi BICE DIVISIONANALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORY
Date Sampled - 10-26-79______ Oate Reported : il~,5-79
Avenue . PITTSBURGH. PA, isaoa Acid——•______ . ••"__ B-N____s_________.Pest«ia-34a-9aoo . ' . - •"' . •
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC. V°A——11———• '• • *• GC/MS
Sample Source Pond Water___________ Sampled bv • Alfred Tuttla
acenaphthene .acroleinacrylonitrilebenzenebenzidinecarbon letrachloridechtorobenzene1.2,4-trichlorobenzenehexachlorobenzene1,2-dichloroethane1 ,1 ,1 -triehloroethanehexachloroethane . :1,1-dichloroethane1 ,1 ,2-trichloroethane1 ,1 ,2.2-tetrachloroethan«chloroethanebis (chloiomethyl) etherbis (2-chloroethyl) ether2-chloroethyl vinyl ether2-chloronaphthalene2.4.6-trichlorcphenol
• parachlorometa cresolchloroform2-chtorophenolt^HJichlorobenzene -1.3-dichlorobenzene • •1.4-dichlorobenzene - . -3,3*-dichlorobenzidin«- --1 ,1 -dichloroethy lene1.2-trans-dichloroethytene2.4-dichlorophenol1.2-dichloropropane1.3-dichtoropropytene2,4-dimethytphenol2,4-dinitrotolueh*2.6-dinitrotoluene1.2-diphenylhydrazineethylbcnzene
g/L
•,
*
•
- .
.-
-*^ *
— •••
pg/U
<i
.
. •
2. .
.. ... •
• .
flvoranthene - -4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether4-bromophenyl phenyl etherbi$(2<htoroisopropyl) etherbis(2-chloroethoxy) methanemethylene chloridemethyl chloridemethyl bromidebromoform •dichlorobrtfmomethanetrichtorolluoromethane .dichlorodifluoromethanechlorodibromomethanehexachlorobutadienihexachlorocyclopentadieneisophorohenaphthalenenitrobenzene2-nitrophenol *4-nitrophenol2.4-dinitrophenol4.6-dinitro-o<resolN-nitrosodimethylamineN-nitrosodiphenylamineN-nilrosodi-n-propylam!ne '.pentachlorophenolphenol '- " 'bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatebutyl benzyl phthalatedi-n-butyl phthatate .di-n-octyl phthalatedfethyl phthalate
. dimethyl phthatatebenzo (a)anthracenebenzo (a)pyrene •3,4-benzofluoranthene'benzolklfluoranthenechrysene •
xg/L
'
.—..
pg/-
612
•1.
91
573
.8
acenapthylene '' anthracenebenzo(ghi)perylenefluorene •phenanthrenedibenzo(a,h)anthraceneindenod ,2.3-cdlpyrenepyrenetetrachlorbethylenetoluenetrichloroethylenevinyl chloride . 'aldrin .dieldrinchlordane' . *4,4'-ODT • . ' . . .4,4'-OOE4,4'-0 DOa-endosulfan/J-endosulfanendosulfan sulfateendrinendrin aldehydeheptachlor •heptachlor eppxidea-BHCf-BHC • .T-BHC (lindane)S-3HCPCS-1242 (Arochlor 1242)PCS-1254 (Arochlor 1254)PCS-1221 (Arochlor 1221)PCB-1232 (Arochlor 1232)PCB-1248 (Arochlor 1248)PCS-1260 (Arochlor 1260)PCS-1016 (Arochlor 1016)ToxapheneXylene
pg/L
- •
."
pg/u
* •
\ )
,
1
Date ExtractedA<»ir> RC
nr/ws 10-26-79B.N " GC -
GC/MS 10-26-79VOA GC
GC/MS
Date Injected Cone. Factor - Standard . . •' Book & Page No.
10-30-79 1000 Consent Decree 32-79-1
10-29-79 1000 Consent Decree • , 26-79-471 — - - . • .
10-26-79 1.0 Consent Decree 26-79-44PEST. GC 10-26-79. . J
...... . . • . . • • . •• " -X"••<lOpg/L • **"<5pg/L m«GC/MS <« Sum of two compounds not separated by the method used A»Average
PROJ TASK MO DAY RICE N3R IOENT TYPE AMOUNT v
""J__L_. ! - A1G• ^ . • , _LLilM,__L_______10 11 12 22 • 25 26 . 33 35
..'.••. . '. - • . • • . . WL-2-78
Rica Sample No. 19120463Project No. -7005 nj ____ Project Mor. C.E.g________DateReceiueH 12-13-79 Time 1 PM,-
CYRUS wM PICE DIVISION ..- ' Date Sampled - 12-13-79 _____ Date Reported 12-21-79ANALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORY
n NOBU< AveiMu. • piTTseuRGM. PA. isaos_ia-3-3-8SOO
FRED C. HART. ASSOCIATES,. INCORPORATED527 Madison AvenueNew York, NY 10022
Attention: Dianne Soramerer 'JftN 68
fer#1 Ohio River Park - Outfall Sewer Main Channel
Test results reported in mg/liter unless otherwise noted. - . - • • '
\
.DETERMINATION*010020030040050060070080090100110120130JO50160170180190
200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370
Acidity Free (CaCOa)Acidity Total <CaCO3>Alkalinity M.O.ICaCOs) -Alkalinity Pht. (CaCOa)Aluminum (AllAmmonia ( . .1Arsenic (As)Barium (Ba)Bicarbonate (CaCOa)Bio Oxygen Demand (O.)Cadmium (Cd)Calcium (Ca)Carbon Inorganic (C)Carbon Organic (C)Carbon Total (C)Carbonate (C03>Chem. Oxygen Dem. (Oj)Chloride ( )Chromate (CrO4)
Chromium (Cr*6)Chromium Total (Cr)Color (APHA)Copper (Cu)Cyanide Free (CN)Cyanide Total (CN)Fluoride (F)Hardness ICaCOs)Hydroxide (OH)Iron ( ) (Fc)Iron Total (Fc)Lead (Pb)Magnesium (Mg)Manganese (Mn)Mercury (Hg). pg/1Nickel (Ni)Nitrate I )Nitrite ( )
OATE
.
RICE
< 0.005. • '
L< 0.01
7
, •
< 0.03V
.< 0.02
< 0.001
< 0.05
< 0.2< 0.02
,
•
'
'
• • /
DETERMINATION*380390400410420430.440450460470480490500510620530540550560
570580590600610620630640
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl (N)Odor, Method:PHPhenolic Cods. (Phenol t cPhosphorus Ortho ( )Phosphorus Total ( )Potassium (K)Selenium (Se)Silica Soluble ( >Silica Total i )Silver (Ag)Sodium (Na)Solids DissolvedSolids SuspendedSolids TotalSolids Non-SettleabteSolids SettleableSolids VolatileSolvent Extract (Oil)
Method:Sp. Cond., 25* C prrthosSulfate< )Sulfide (S)Surfactants (MBAS)Tin (Sn)Turbidity (JTU)Zinc(Zn)MiscellaneousAntimonyBerylliumThallium
DATE RICE
6.60.018
< 0.005
< 0.02
3.4
• 0.04
< 0.1< 0.02< 0.1
.
. "
1
'Special Instructions (Methods, Etc.)
PROJ TASK MO DAY RICE NBH ID'ENT ____ TYPE AMOUNT
I l - l I I I I - I I I 1 1 I I IA19 .''
10 11 12 22——~2T~26————————————3T15————'————————————— >V *5S U U X fff&——— 63
19120463Rict Sample No. •L»**u««»-»Project No. 7985.01 ' Project Mar. CEG'Date Received___12nlii22______ Time 1;00 P.M.
CVPL.S WM. P.CB o,y.s,ON Oate SamPled ———1?"1V Dat« Report8d 12"3ANALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORY
. PITTSBURGH, PA. 133133 . .. -ia-3-3-33OO
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES INC. VOA————'—————~GC/MS——————*————-B
Sampl- Source ffl Ohio River Park - Outfall Sewer Main Channel _____
acenaphtheneacroleinacrylonitrilebenzenebenzidin*carbon tetrachloride :chlorobenzene1,2.4-trichlorobenzene 'hexachlorobenzene1,2-dichloroethane •1,1,1-trichloroethanehexachloroethane1,1-dichloroethar.e1,1.2-trichloroethane1.1 ,2.2-tetrachloroethan*chlbroethan. •bis (chloromethyl) etherbis (2-chloroethyl) ether .2-chloroethyl vinyl ether2-chloronaphthalene2.4, 3-trichloro phenolparachlorometa cresolchloroform2-chlorophenol .1 ,2-di chlorobenzene1,3-dichlorobenzene1.4-dichlorobenzene3,3*-di chloroben zidi n*1 ,t -dichloroethy lene
i 1,2-trans-dichloroethylene' 2,4-dichlorophenol1 ,2-dichloropropane1,3-dichloropropylene2,4-dimethylphenol2.4-dinitrotoluene2,6-dinitrotoluene.1 Z-di pheny Ihydrazineethylbenzene
Mg/L
- ^
- ,.
pg/L
l
1
4
fluoran there4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether4-bromophenyl phenyl etherbis(2-chloroisopropyl) etherbis(2<hloroethoxy) methanemethylene chloridemethyl chloridemethyl bromidebromoformdichlorobromomethanetrichlorofluoromtthane .dichlorbdifluoromethanechlorodibromomethanehexachlorobutadiisn*hexachtorocyclopentadien*isophoronenaphthalene :nitrobenzene2-nitrophenol4-nitrophenol2.4-dinitrophenol4.6-dfnitro-o-cresolN-nitrosodimethylamineN-nitrosodi phenylamineN-nitrosodi-n-propylaminepentachlorophenolphenol .bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatebutyl benzyl phthalatedi-n-butyl phthalatedi-n-octyl phthatatedlethyl phthalat*dimethyl phthalatebenzo (alanthracenebenzo(a)pyrene3,4-benzofluoranthenebenzo(k)fluoranthenechrvsane
pg/u
-
P9/-
7
acenapthyleneanthracenebenzo (ghi I pery lenefluorene .phenanthrenedibenzo(a,h)«nthrac»neindenod ,2.3-cdlpyrenepyranetetrachloroethylenetoluenetrichloroethylenevinyl chloridealdrindietdrinchlordane4.4'-DDT4,4'-OOE4,4'-OOOa-endosulfan-endosulfanendosulfan sulfateendrinendrin aldehydeheptachlorheptachlor epoxidea-3HC>BHCT-8HC (lindane)t-BHCPCS-1242 (Arochlor 1242)PCB-1 254 (Arochlor 1254)PCS-1221 1 Arochlor 1221 1 .PC 3-1 232 (Arochlor 1232)PCS-1248 (Arochlor 1243)PCS-1260 (Arochlor 1260)PCS-1016 (Arochlor 1016)Toxa'pheneXylene
pg/L
1
pg/L
^
<1
\
t
J
AGIO G.GCft
3-N GGC/S.
YOA GGC/IV
PEST. G
Data Extracted Data Injectedf.UScIScusc
12/17/79
Cone. Factor Standard Book & Pag* No.
1
1.0, 1.0 Consent
* . ,
Decree 26-79-83
aianle soaces indicate all VOA compounds were searched for but not detected.•-OOpJ/L **-<5f*a/L
PROJ TASK MO DAY RICE
\ \ I- s )
m-GC/MS <- Sum of two compounds not separated by the method used, A.»Average
NBa IOENT TYPE AMOUNT 7
1A2° , if? 1 nPT fla10 11 12 22 2S 28 33 35
; WL-2-78Rice Sample No. 19120467______
Project No.____7385.01________ Project MOT. C.E.G__________Date Received 12-13-79 Time 4;10 PM
CYBUS WM. R.C6 DIVISION . iV Date Sampled———12-13-79-^-^— Date Report ,.pl2-j21-79_______ANALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORY " ,_ ,,
is MO.LE Avenue . PITTSBURGH. PA. isaos • li\6(jf, . , - _ia-3-3-»aoo- • • . . ' • • . ' ' '
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ' ; • ' ' - '527 Madison Avenue .New York NY 10022
Attention: Dianne Sommerer . '
Ohio River Park - Outfall #2 Main Channel. Test results reported in mg/liter unless otherwise noted. , . .
VPRO
< _ .
DETERMINATION*010020030040050060070080090100110120,130
r4o160170180190
200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370
Acidity Free (CaCOa)Acidity Total (CaCOa)Alkalinity M.O. (CaCOa)Alkalinity Pht. (CaCOa)Aluminum (AI)Ammonia ( " )Arsenic (As)Barium (8a)Bicarbonate (CaCOa)Bio Oxygen Demand (O2>Cadmium (Cd)Calcium (Ca)Carbon.Carbon
Inorganic (C)Organic 1C)
Carbon Total (C)Carbonate (COa)Chem. Oxygen Oem. (O2>Chloride ( )Chromate (CrO4)Chromium (Cr*6)Chromium Total (Cr)Color (APHA)Copper (Cu)Cyanide Free (CN)Cyanide Total (CN)Fluoride (F)Hardness (CaCOa)Hydroxide (OH)Iron ( ) (Fc)Iron Total (Fe)Lead (Pb)Magnesium (Mg)Manganese (Mn)Mercury (Hg). pg/1NickelNitrate
INi)I )
Nitrite ( ) •
•Special
J'J
DATE RICE
< 0.005•
0.01
17
< 0.03
< 0.02
0.207
< 0.05
< 0< 0
.2
.02
-
*
.
' f
DETERMINATION*380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560
570580590600610620630640
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl (N)Odor, Method:PHPhenolic Cods. (Phenol)Phosphorus Ortho ( )Phosphorus Total ( )Potassium (K)Selenium (Se)Silica Soluble ( >Silica Total ( )Silver (Ag)Sodium (Na)Solids DissolvedSolids SuspendedSolids TotalSolids Non •SettleableSolids SettleableSolids VolatileSolvent Extract (Oil)
Method:Sp. Cond.. 25* C pmhosSulfate ( )Sulfide (S)Surfactants (MB AS)Tin ISn)Turbidity (JTU)Zinc (Zn)MiscellaneousAntimonyBervlliumThallium
\
Instructions (Methods, Etc.) '
TASK MO DAY RICE NBR IDENTr i i 1 421
DATE
TYPE
flklr A?4.
RICE
7.80.29
(
< 0.005
< 0.02
< 0.2
0.03
<<
0.0.0.
3021
. AMOUNT
J
• V
10 11 12 22 25 26 33 35 47 W> ^*» * H «w
.——— Hie-Samol-Na. 19120467Project No. 7985.01______-• Project Mgr.Data Revived 12-13-79 Time
. cvnus VMM Rcrptv-jcm Date Sampled 12-13~79——————— Date ReportedANALYTICAL SERVICES LABORATORY . _
13 MOBLB AV«MU« . piTTsauBOM,CA. 13-03 Acid—————.————————_ B-N————_—_—_—_____ Pest ______________. 'N
VOA _______GC/MS______A____3_____V \ /'FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED : ————— ———:— ^Sample Sourct ______Ohio River Parlc - Outfall #2 Main Channel ____________________'_
acenaphthenaacroleinacrylonitrilabenzenebenzidinecarbon tetrachloridechlorobenzene1,2.4- trichlorobenzeriehexachlorobenzene1.2-dichloroethane1 ,1 ,1 -trichloroethanehexachloroethane1,1-dichloroethan*1,1,2-trichloroethane1.1.2.2-tetrachloroethan.chloroethanebis (chloromethyl) etherbis (2-chloroethyl) ether2-chlorocthyl vinyl ether2-chloronaphthatane
. 2.4,6-trichlorophenolparachlorometa cresolchloroform2-chlorophenol1,2-dichlorobenzene1,3-dichlorobenzene1,4-dichlorobenzene3,3*-dichlorobenzidine1,1-dichloroethylene1 ,2-trans-dichloroethylene2,4-dichlorophenol1,2-dichloropropane1 ,3-dichloropro py le nt2,4-dimethylphenol2.4-dinitrotoluene2,6-dinitrotoluenet ,2-di phenyl hy drazi neethylbenzene
Mg/L M9/L
37
2
fluoranthena4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether ,4-bromophenyl phenyl etherbis(2-chloroisopropyl) etherbis(2-chloroethoxy) methanemethylene chloridemethyl chloridemethyl bromidebromoformdichlorobromo methanetrichlorofluoromethanedichlorodifluoromethane.chlorodibromo methanehexachlorobutadienehexaehloroeyclopentadieneisophorone .naphthalenenitrobenzene2-nitrophenol '4-nitrophenol2.4-dinitrophenol4,6-drnitro-o-cresolN-nitrosodi methylamineN-nitrosodiphenylamin*N-nitrosodi-n-propylaminepentachlorophenolphenolbis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatebutyl benzyl phthalatedi-n-butyl phthalatedi-n-octyl phthalatedi ethyl phthalatedimethyl phthalatebenzotalanthracenebenzo(a)pyrent3.4-benzofluorarithenibenzo(k)fluoranthentchrysene
M9/L
;
M9/L
5
•
acenapthylentanthracene . .benzo (ghi Ipery lenefluorena •phenanthrenedibenzota.hlanthraceneindenod ,2,3-cd)pyrenepyrenatetrachloroethylene •toluenetrichloroethylenevinyl chloridealdrindieldrinchlordane4.4'-DOT4,4'-OOE4,4'-OOOa-endoiulfan/J-endosulfanendosulfan sulfateendrinendrin aldehydeheptachlorheptachlor epoxidea-BHCff-BHCT-BHC (lindane)5-3HCPCS-1242 (Arochlor 12421PCS-1254 (Arochlor 1 254)PCS-1221 (Arochlor 12211PCS-1237 (Arochlor 1232)PCS-1243 (Arochtor 1248)PCS-1260 (Arochlor 1260)PCS-1013 (Arochlor 1016)ToxapheneXylene
WJ/L
•
not.
1
-V
t
j
•Data Extracted Data Injected Cone. Factor ' Standard Book&PagaNo.inn r.r
.GC/MSB-N GC
GC/MSfXJA GC
GC/MS 12/17/79
1.
/ • •
1.0 Consent Decree 26-79-88PEST. GC
Blank soaces indicate all VOA compounds were searched for but not detected. v•<10»i9/L »*-<5Ma/L
PROJ TASK MO DAY RICEr s |7 10 11 12 22 25 26
m-GC/MS <- Sum of two compounds not separated by the method used
NBfl IOENT TYPH AMOUNT
1A2233 35
.1 JJJo 1iV sd " " *»5» «58
A-Average
63
WL-2-78Rice Sample No. 16120468
Project No. 7985.01 Project MOT. C.E.G__________Data Received 12-13-79 Time 4; 10 PM
CYPUS wivi BICE DIVISION t; Date Sampled———12-13-79_;* i. Data Rer*mg4 12-21-79______ANALYTICAL CERVICES LABORATORY ' . ' M ''t
Moeic AVCNUC . PITTSBURGH. PA. isaoa : ' - , . ._ia-3-3-fi2OO ;
i ' •% .FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED527 Nadison AvenueNew York, NY 10022Attention: Dianne Sommerer
Surface PondingTest results reported In mg/liter unless otherwise noted.
DETERMINATION*010
. 020030040050060070080090100110120JM
V 1| 160170
,«P190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330J40ISO360'70
Acidity Free (CaCOa)Acidity Total (CaCOa)Alkalinity M.O. (CaCOa)Alkalinity Pht. (CaCOa)Aluminum (AI)Ammonia I IArsenic (As)Barium (Ba)Bicarbonate (CaCOs) -Bio Oxygen Demand (O_)Cadmium (Cd)Calcium (Ca)Carbon Inorganic (C)Carbon Organic (C)jifarbbn Total (C)Carbonate (CO3>Chem. Oxygen Dem. (O2>Chloride ( )Chromate (CrO4)Chromium (Cr46)Chromium Total (Cr)Color IAPHA)Copper (Cu)Cyanide Free (CN)Cyanide Total (CN)Fluoride (F)Hardness (CaCOa)Hydroxide (OH) :Iron ( ) (Fe)Iron Total (Fa)Lead (PblMagnesium (Mg)Manganese (Mn)Mercury (Hg), j<g/1 xNickel (NiJNitrate ( )Nitrite ( )
DATE
»
'
RICE
< 0.005
< 0.01
24
< 0.03
< 0.02
0.005
< 0.05
< 0.20.02
,
1
"
-
I
_
DETERMINATION*380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540650560
570580•590600610620630640
Nitrogen. Kjeldahl (N)Odor. Method:PHPhenolic Cods. (Phenol)Phosphorus Ortho ( IPhosphorus Total ( )Potassium (K)Selenium (Se)Silica Soluble ( )Silica Total ( )Silver (Ag)Sodium (Na)Solids DissolvedSolids SuspendedSolids TotalSolids Non-SettleableSolids SettleableSolids VolatileSolvent Extract (Oil)
Method7Sp. Cond., 25* C «imhosSulfate ( )Sulfide (S)Surfactants (MBAS)Tin (Sn)Turbidity (JTU)Zinc(Zn)MiscellaneousAntimonyBerylliumThallium
DATE
.
. -
RICE
7.50.003
< 0.005
< 0.02
•
< 0.2
0.04
0.2< 0.02< 0.1
^
-.
f
Special Instructions (Methods, Etc.)Y :\
)J TASK MO DAY RICE NBR IDENT TYPE AMOUNTf l i i . i i i i i i i i i i i j A2310 11 12 22 25 26
Rica Sample No. __9________17985.01 Project Mgr._CEfl.
COFPORATOM Date Received __12nJL3=J3____' Time 4; 10 P.M.CY«USWM.R,CEO,V,SION Date Sampled 12-13-79——————— Date Reported 12-31-79
ANALYTICAL S8RVICE3 LABORATORY A-J • OM ris NOBH.C AvcNue • PITTSBURGH: PA. i_act3 Acid—————_———————.B-N—.—.———————_____ Pest
, VOA__:_________ GC/MS______A a ____\l ____^JFRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATEDSample Source Surface Ponding _________________________' • ' ' '_______ '__________
acenaphtheneacrolein .acrylonitrilebenzenebenzidinecarbon tetrachloridechlorobenzene1,2.4-trichlorobenzenehexachlorobenzene'1,2-dichloroethana1 .1 .1 -trichloroethanehexachloroethana1.1-dichloroethane1.1 ,2-trichloroet hane1,1 ,2.2-tetrachloroethanach.loroethanabis (chloromethyl) etheroil (2-chloroethyl) ether2-chloroethyl vinyl ether2-chloronaphthalent2.4.6-trichlorophenolparachlorometa cresotchloroform2-Chlorophenolf.2-dichlorobenzena1.3-dichlorobenzene1,4-dichlorobeniene3,3'-dichlorobenzidine1,1-dichloroethylene . '1.2-trans-dichloroethylene2,4-dichlorophenol .1.2-dichloropropane1.3-dichloropropylene2.4-dimethy (phenol2.4-dinitrotoluene2.S-dinitrotoluena
! 1.2-diph«nylhydrazinej ethylbenzene
MQ/L
'
nil.
. .
2
.
fluoranthena4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether4-bromophenyl phenyl etherbis(2-chloroisopropyl( etherbis(2-chlbroethoxy) methanemethyleoa chloridemethyl chloridemethyl bromidebromoform 'dichlorobromdmethanetrichlorofluoromathanedichlorodifluoromethanechlorodibromomethanehexachlorobutadiena
• hexachlorocyelopentadienaisophoronenaphthalenenitrobenzene2-nitrophenol4-nitrophenol2.4-dinitrophenol4,6-drnitro-o-cresolN-nitrosodimethylamine 'N-nitrosodi phenylamineN-nitrosodi-n-propylaminepentachlorophenolphenolbis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatebutyl benzyl phthalatedi-n-butyl phthalatedi-n-octyl phthalatediethyl phthalatedimethyl phthalatebenzo(a)anthracenebenzo(a)pyrene3,4-benzofluoranthenebenxo(k)fluoranthenachrysene
ug/L X9/L
3/
'
acenapthylenaanthracenebenzd(ghi)perylenefluorenephenanthrenedibenzo(a,h)anthracanaindenod ,2 -cdlpyrenepyrenatetrachloroethylenatoluenetrichloroethylenevinyl chloridealdrindieldrinchiordane4.4'-DOT4.4--ODE •' •4,4'-DDDa'-endosulfaniS-endosulfanendosulfan sulfattendrinendrin aldehyde*heptachlorheptachlor epoxidia-SHCP-SHCf-BHC (lindane)a-SHCPCS-1242 (Arochlor 1242)PCS-1254 (Arochlor 1254)PCS-1221 (Arochlor 1221)PCS-1232 (Arochlor 1232)PCS-1243 (Arochlor 1243)PC3-12SO (Arochlor 1260)PCB-1 018 (Arochlor 101 6)ToxapheneXylene
Mfl/L
' .
.
. w/L
• v
' .
•
•*
1
J
ACID GGC/f.
3-N GGC'M
VOA GGC/
PEST. G
Data ExtractedC(IS6ISCus • •c
' Data Injected
12/17/79
Cone. Factor • ' Standard
1.0 Consent Decree
Blank soaces indicate all VOA*-<10p3i
PROJ
L *»-<5ji«g/_
TASK MO DAY RICH
J 1 1
Book SiPaga No.
26-79-88
comoounds were searched for hut not detected.m-GC/MS <• Sum of two compounds not separated by the method used
NBR IDENT TYPE AMOUNT
1 A24 ' f\iiiiMi_J____.
-
i
~; JA'Average
10 11 12 22 25 23 33 35 47 50 54 56 63
.CAMP DRESSER &MCKE.E INC.
'' 9mHvmwtal tnginetn. identlsts. p; %"_ '"* , ; One Center Plara.planners. _ management consuiuiitt '• \ _S *""' ' ~- S *,'; i Boston. Massachusetts 02 108
."'" Z~. - • 617742-5151
5 November 1979
Diahe SonmererFred C. Hart Associates527 Madlson AvenueNew York, NY 10022 ^ ^
Dear D1ane: .
Enclosed please find the analytical results for the two (2) samplessubmitted to the Boston laboratory of Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (COM)for analysis on October 2, 1979.These samples were analyzed for the following parameters as per yourverbal Instructions:
Total CyanideFree CyanideTotal Metals (Pb, As, Hg)PhenolDichlorophenolsParanltrophenolBenzo-a-pyrene
1 Benz(a)anthraceneParathionHerbicide Scan (2,4-D; 2.,4,5-T & Silvex)VOA Scan (Benzene; Toluene; CC14; CHCls)
All analyses are complete with the,exception of the herbicide scan.These results will be forwarded to you when complete.In addition to the compounds reported, there was GC/MS evidence forthe presence of the following compounds:
Tetrahydrofuran1,2,3-trichloropropane2-chlorocyclohexanoneDi-2-ethylhexyl phthlateN-ethyl-tol-4-yl sulphonamlde ,
A25
ORIGINAtCAMP DRESSER X McKEE INC,Environmental Sciences Division
Diane SommererFred C. Hart Associates5 November 1979 -2- >
In addition, there was GC-only evidence for the presence of the followingcompounds: .
, , • . . ' • • i * . ' , . - •
DisulfotonDlmethoateMerphos
If there are any questions concerning these results, please don't hesitateto call.Sincerely yours,
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.
Donald G. MuldoonLaboratory ManagerEnvironmental Sciences Division
DGM/cb
A26 fl.R.100215
in
•e <t c\i — r• _J 01^Ol Q.UJ *-.-o oi .< r*.«/) LU S t-lUJ K- 10CK: z «v_-a LU zo o
_< z O LUo o oa j—
evCMoo
-3 S-COO) >•
I— COQ£ C Z<C O
0*0UJ r*. 3:o; CM aiu_ in z
O ooco «~ to
§ S10
z oLU CO
inroO
o
a
co
c£U.O
UJ ^g °z ^-^o u.O£ •—•
> ^
c-o
ooto<•
oo: _i1— O*" ?SZ UJ
S£<•a.
O —1ceoo z_j LU_. __. o a.«_*o
LUO.
, >-5*
||'
PH- ~J-
O5'
O ^<
LUa'LU zLU <u. o
UJa^^•3, ZZ
O >•1-0
-fc .jQ>—_i _.
•M§i§oo§«-
W *J sr— C—a.---E <-<o oto w»
CDa
,• 1
1-1
1
. '
1
11
1I
1
inod
r-.O•O
inCO
^CM
I
1
1t
11
11
' *Jfo0o
-r• - •-
5«
O
,1
, 1
-
' •-•
rif'
vosin
C_»1
•\ I
,1
11
1 '
1
COs0, V
cnCVJ '
cnCOd,
,ii
r'i'•
CO-J- '
^CM1
I
11
1• 1
11
1I
11
X 1 .11
odV
,_Oov
COCOm
e£~ —>1
1
CJV
.o__y
d• v
ii
iii
iii
i
!
iiii
cnCOin
«cCM1
I
%
dV
.oy
dV
11
11
111
111
1111
ocnin
(r_• ii
ji
vi .ii •
'
,i.*-'
ji
• >i
. iii
,i!
•x111
'
cnin
<cii
ii
iii
II
"' ;
•|
•|
' |': |
. 1
,
|
1
|
|
. . |
'
CMcn. -r-in
<cCM1
flK
t
-
•
f•<. •cna.
f.™"cn
•.cn3
o>E
'
^ ^cnE'
^cnE
O(/)(O
r-cn
oVIIO•*
1
vt"*•"g
0o.&Oivt013^——
<a—<
"tn
,
01u1ff«oe11 110u« -*J>>IO£
JC/
_
S-5E
OJoo•<
»a.*
LU
"QU__ 1 f>
COo — „
irC_O.Iu
t.a> aicn *j^3 ' A3c o»o
t'o+J' IO
oftIO_l
t_o <uat 4->•r— ' IO> Oa*a.
'<s>.2o•M«OOJOIO_J
Y
a . inUJ POos os- wLU .Q£a.
REPOR
__ • 2s_ • comZ < "• i _.,("3 »-»CM "t>a «a: CM >. -J or-. 1
co os <t rco LU s 1-1UJ m^ Z •>--•a uj zo oa. i— ••§ z o LUO O CO I—
in
rau
CO ,
2CO
COUl
ofcO
COCO
n
•__ UJLU O
COCO
LU__ 'V ' I W TO. *• UJ •
S r-& < c £ « C « S < < «C < ' _' . Li— -- Cw V ^O
UKI-lflAl(Red)
BENZ(a)
ANTHRACENE
1O UJ(vl ZZ LULU acCO >•a.
•s.p
' U.
§O_J5
UJ§ QJ 2
co i— ceae ujo"""I
' UJ«Z 'UJ_3_J>) M
UJzUJtxl'zLU
• CO
§. • _c
S'<ca.=«*<
_Qm o-j J-Si00
§• -*tltrr3 u
CO (/>_.
1
I1||
,tIt
||
J
|. |||
iiii
ii
irccIT
C\
2
i
11
I111
1.111
1.111
1111
1111
1
1
vo.coin
i
iii
iiii
,ii •1
i}
iii• i
ii •ii
iii
COs
CM
I
11
1||
|
. ,t1'
.
1 .11
1111
• | •• |1
1I1
COCOin
«=£
i
0z
. QZ
1 '11
. 1
1111
1111
1111
~"._, 3
'
§.• in
CM
• • __
0
a~—•
iiii
. iiii
iiii
irii
.!•"Oy
"8in
i
ii 'i
ii- ii
9o.v
•OV'
*'Oy
*dy
iiiI
ovin
' t
ii
ii• i
*oy
.Oy
,|i•Oy
.O'v
f111
CMcnm
§
•o01+Ju01+J__oIIQZ
I0<
IO
•o3
tU«S-01>%J=• *«>i.3IO2cne. o•— 'cn3•
O.r— af 1 *•.
0 Erec vo•F- C+J.-IOfc. 4-+J Cc aOl ironC -O Cac _:
•f£
3 +•S^U 0*J •-
QJ +.o aZ "C*
12i*»
r—*
CJi_a
-»• cn3
r~.O3
™cn3
cn3
U)<•001+JV.oQ.Ol
WlIn
s5
<uui01c.*flu•f»•Ul^"•0
5
1Z
0)o_>CO
o.*LU
inOCO<
t.01 <UCfl 4Jz ..
o<o
O 0)VI -U•f— to> o01%CO
bo-J£ •o
COoUJ
mrooa.LUCw
c_2 _LU -f-ce u.
A23
LU in'-C. t—•u co in
r>J rtCM•o <s CM *r__ o »*»co o: <c r*.oo uj 3? -UJ (— u,
O LU Z*^o oQ- h- ..E LU I/I _l< Z O LUO O CO h-
co
VI
VI
IOU
COO COCO *-•«v. • COz >-2. s.CO Z
CO >-LU <CO 0_Z OLU COi-i <
ooen
00co
>'
X<u
CO
H-**>
oM
__ t—' <0 O< _J i-
oo
Sample
Description
••'*<
Of.z
z
c-z
iin
.CMi
< ';•
0£Z
i
Ofz
ocn— t-in
i
-,-
<
••'
-
\
'
! : / • • •#
\
••.
T(4\i((O
•4.IS
o2
'
' •
cn
cn3
w
VI
•OO)toQ.
VI0)
>
•
-
[Ana
lyti
cal
Reference
-. ~ •
-
1z4->
'£'oco
a!LU
Ul rv »§— ' . OJ nj ** _CH
Gl--. ~ •
.At
•<j•f
5_O)cn<c
_. E
S-C• •01IO
. » —cc1u.
^ ^
k
o
|«=*i1j.
O*-
>V>• •
O O)V) 4->•r- IO
__.CL'3CO
<oo
UJ COcc•£•• ' ,Q.
OCL__
A2S
o1.
UJ f-4LU in^ —+•u co m
_ . .co QS < r*CO LU 2 •-»LU I— . VOce z " Z*O UJ Zo oa. H- ••5 uj to _i< Z O UJ
2 «• SC-Tz :•"* cn
co >o co -S"Q3 M_I ^^ in
0coJ2o
o .,2oo
OS i-i
IO 01O 4J
ai vi o4J co a.
1. 01 3O) Z OO ••-C >
2*.-* , c a>
co* ««a. oz
<a
£
cr>o>
VI
in
CMCM
O
cn
cnCMcn
014-»u01
'ooCM
h- • < 0»• i O O -f— OO >! UJ Z Q_ -r-i •-> _ o . LU at—« o i_J a. H- uI C_ LU LU <C O»i CL ce ai a c_
• • '
• X'01
CO
1—*
in«CM
'01
CM
EJ3 •i. O
0 _JZ
. c
.0•f—
__•*-I h*o oco vio>a
'
'1
Hg-icv
"1cJ
i",cv1^
hIc
-cV
c
1in
5ii. t
•
-
n
^
:
•
i
H
-i
..
n
-
1
'
•
'..
J
^
•
.
•
L_
*•
-
-J
/
'
r
i
.
h
h
,
^
^
r-
r
i
"
n
^
H
'.'
'
-
r-
i-
1-
f=
1
(/> I
"
cn
I/I V10 U
»^ 5C7I.C3 •>
*
•VI V<a u_ ,_
|?f4d
VI
•a01uoQ.01O£VI01
• 3ra_»
_*
"*•
fk
1
^11
1
a>u£•o>_.*io(J+J^
<oc
**•
ICO O
I - I • I ' 1 I I t £ E ^
n
ot_§
P,
^
/
01Q.
5<a
flRIO-02 I-9.
ORIGIfJAl/B .nCAMP DRESSER i McMi INC.pECOne Center Plaza
pitmen, t mmvgemer* eonsUOnts £Cf4A-JMT* ,: Boston Massachusetts 021 06-
28 December 1979
CERTIFICATE OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
SAMPLES SUBMITTED BY: Fred C. Hart Associates, Inc.527 Madison Avenue 'New York, NY 10022Attn: Diane Sommerer. . . i
DATE SAMPLES RECEIVED: 7 December 1979
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS: COM Lab.Control No. Description____
5709 MW-1A1; Collected 12/6/795710 MW-2A1; Collected 12/6/79
- A field blank (COM Lab. Control No. 5711)was submitted with the samples in orderto monitor any possible contaminationof the samples during collection andhandling. -
ANALYSIS: The samples were analyzed for total .anddissolved arsenic, lead and mercury accord-ing to procedures outlined in StandardMethods for the Examination of Water andWastewater, 14th Edition, 1975, APHA/AWWA/WPCF; and/or by the EPA Manual of Methods ,for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes",March 1979. "-.The attached table summarizes all analyticalresults.
DateLaboratory Supervisor"
^ ; File No. 8035Lab Nos: 5709-5710
A31 4 .R 100220
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.Environmental Sciences Division
/
MW-1A1 MW-2A1Coll. 12/6/79 Colt. 12/6/79
5709 5710
Total Arsenic, mg/1 <0.02 <0.02
Dissolved .Arsenic, mg/1 V <0.02 <0.02
Total Lead, mg/1 l <0.02 <0.02
Dissolved Lead, mg/1 <0.02 <0.02
Total Mercury, mg/1 <0.01 <0.01
Dissolved Mercury, mg/1 l <0.01 <0.01
1 Filtrate through a 0.45y membrane filterNote: None of the above metals were detected in the field
blank (COM Lab. No. 5711). -
A32 AR 100221
B. FIELD SOIL BORING LOGS
flRIO0222
Fred C. Hart Associates, Inc.
"**"* Allegheny County Health Department """ "° M W - 1Ohio River Park ,r -7 '6-fi — -
omiumt A6IKC* * , a»rtsr»«T«o O»TI »IM!M«»O cu»«»ti™o« oi»rwTo»oe*
Pennsylvania Drillina Comoanv 25 Sep 7925 Sop 79°§32 ft V
B Drill . u~"* 6 ^-->-—"•-" Hollow Stem Auaers jmnu,.L "T 1.0' 21.0' 21.5'C.IIWlllMtl* iMtlCMT «• — — — •• — •• I3»0» ________—————————— ! —————————— 1 —————————— Bernie GolHhue.—*.•• 24 in -pm ^pnnn ,,«._,0_--.«_ ——— .» j-,.c«, 14Q# jo.0. 3Q 1n R1ck D(jrr
ii
.
•ttMMi
' 3•»
•MHV
PM* '
—— 5»
_^
•••
IMto
M-H_»
^
M»
•Hv
••»
•_«M»fQ
M»
•••••••»••»••»••i to
—15M»
i«
^
•V
••
^
•»
—20M» .
•»
•»
•»
••M
••
••
••
—23^••••
•» .•_••»
-»•••«
— 30••i»
••
•••••w
»•••
33
3-UX..-S
NO. LOC.
-
CM
CO
-1-
ir>
vo
-
COCO
COCO
COCO
COCO
ca
z
%
I
m1-4
Oi- 1
ini— i
0-H
__.
ih
aCM
iii
6,9ib
4* '
1$'
'sis'
BAG8.10
*
7,1818,11
LOG OF BORING '
DESCRIPTION ,
Dark Brown Topsoil
Stiff, Brown, Clayey Silt (Dry) "
Loose Brown, Silty Fine Sand With ClayLayers (Moist)
(Same)
. • . ' • • • '
' - • . .Medium Dense, Brown Fine Sand WithCoarse Angular Gravel (Wet) .
•••Dense, Tan Coarse Sandy Gravel (Wet)
(Same)
Boring Terminated
——— ! —————— —— — • ui nt\
REMARKS
Start 0930 Hrs. .
' V
From 0' to 21',. Smooth,Easy Drilling, No Ob-structions, No Odors
Slight Organic OdorFrom Bag Sample TakenFrom Augers at 24'
Installed 2 3/8 1n.ID PVC; Slotted From28 Ft. to 18 Ft.
' • ;' . " " N-
Finish 1300 Hrs.
-
j
j
.".to.
Fred C. Hart Associates, Inc. f• .POMCTMS
Allegheny County. Health Department————— ! ——— Ohio River Park ________ ; ——— ____ _D«lktlMC«CCMC* * -
———— ! _____ Pennsylvania PHITlng Tnmpany ——
B Drill*..«_,T~<o»..r Hollow Stem AuqersCASJMO • • , . ,
,*«-.«• 24 1n Split Spoon«_-v..__— .. }«•«- 140 f I""0' 30 in.
5 •»
V
itttuifl
w
w
I H M
!•»
••
•••
•»
••
mm
•••
m
••»
— tomm-
•'
••M W
mm<
<
—15••
• w
^
- •20
••
> ^^
mt
— 25
•
-»
imt••
— 30••••
<MM»
*-mH*
--»
UA—— uf»
•301 'CM
-
CM
•
CO
*
in
vo
S
CO
COCO
COCO
COCO
COCO
n
i
in>—i
in.-H
U)
OI—I
ot— 1
oCM
li'l
3,2,1
2,2,4
4*
6,9,15
11,1625
•
20,24
• ' • . . . . L O G O F
•OHIMOMO •
,:..;:,• M W - 2
'"""""**"" . 715.2
Zs's'ep' 79 25 " Sep*79 °"T" 32 . 0 '
o • ., •
-_r..tt«it 6.5 ft. 6.5 ft. 20.5
B. GolllhueIfU^tCTUK
R. DorrlerBORING ;
DESCRIPTION
Dark Brown Tops-oil
Brown Sandy Silt (Cuttings)
Black Tar and Light Grey Pasty Material(Wet. Strono Odor) •
VOID .* , .
Firm, Brown Fine Sandy Silt. (Wet WithOrganic Odor)
Very Loose Dark Brown Si 1 ty "FWith Tan Clay Layers (Wet Wit
ine Sandh Organic
Medium Dense Tan Silty Fine Sand ' ••
Medium Dense Grey Clean Fine.With Organic Odor)
Dense Black Coarse Sandy Roun(Wet With Strong Organic Odor
(Same)
Sand (Wet
i
ded Gravel)
Boring Terminated :
REMARKS
Start 1345
Rods Dropped From6.5' to 10 Ft.
Installed 2 3/8 in.ID PVC; Slotted From25 to 30 Ft.
Finish 1545 Hrs.
....flRIOOAeUl ———— *
Fred C. Hart Associates,' •• - - . - »*oj«er **.
"OJ*eT Allegheny County Health Departmenttoc-rio* ' •
Ohio River ParkOJUtUMa ABIMCV •
Pennsylvania Drill inq Company
B Drill \i,««ot.-,o*.,r Hollow Stem Auqers
•— «-. 24 in. Split Spoons__»v*»-~~.« IM.OMI 140 laws* 30
f!
-
OIPIH.H
mm*wm*
mm
— 5mm
I K
ii
•_•••• .
mm>
m>
—to«•»mm*
mmmmHIH»
^
m
mi
— tsi»
M
IM
§•
^
••
— 20mm
•••B*
mm
mmmm
—25^ <mm>
mm
mmmm»mm
wmmm •
— 30
mm
fmm •
mm
mm* -
mm
tmm
——15.
!_.M*«.tS
NO. t
oe.
-
CM
CO
<*•
in
vo
_to
- •
00CO
(OCO
V
CO(O
COCO
COCO
to.
r
t«X
or-l
ini— i
in
in•— i
in
oCM
rt Ni
t HA.
o»*in.
UW/« IN .
30, 2(?•?
5T41"6
jj,8
3* '
3,6,
6\8*
LOG OF
T"0 M W - 3(LIVATIOH Mt<«CI , 723.3
0-rfCTA_T«0 0-T« MMI»MtO CU»»*.tTI««
26 Sep 792.6 Sep 7S0'"-—
--T..HV.I. 24.0 24.0
—iOl>r« TO -rxr
tOUtUAM •
B. Go! 11 hue
R. DorrlerBORING
OESCRIPTtON
Black Cinders, Foundary Sand
Stiff Dark Brown Clayey SiltWith Strong Organic Odor) •
and Slag
(Moist
Wet Black Material Including WoodChips, Glass, Plastic With Very StrongOdor ?Cutt1ngsl .Stiff Brown Silty Clay (Moist WithOrganic Odorl .
Stiff Brown Fine Sandy Clay (Wet WithNo Odorl
*
Loose Tan Clean Fine Sand (Wet. SlightOrganic Odor)Loose Brown Silty F?ne San3 [Wet WithSlight Odor)
, ' \ ' ' *
Dense Brown Sandy Gravel
————————————— L —— . n- - ———— : ———.
. —— a.
REMARKS
Start 0815
•
kl 00225-
' ^
-r*
J
{i
Fred C. Hart Associates, Inc.PROJECT NO. A016a
CASING^]
BL/FT 1
0 "*
35
••••'
mm
mm
mmmmm
mm*
immr
^mmm-* v>
»••*•»
••»
•*mmm
mmmt \•mmr
tmm^mm
t mr
MmW
mm^mmm
t mf
l mm.
***—•
m^
*mmmmm+
i*m~
mm, •
•mm
mmmmm,
mm
mm
mm '
m^mm
mm
mm
immmmm
m*
mm
m ,
SAMPLESL»
3
^
•
i>L.
/)
Ku.
C3CM
" S -IU J
! C CD
8,109,21
LOG OF BORING MU - 3• -A'-. ' ; ' - . ' . . ..5 :-irv;.v ' • ' 1 In • J -
DESCRIPTION
Dense, Tan Coarse Sand and Rounded Gravel(Wet Slight OdorJ
Boring Terminated
4- ' '
' • - " . ' ' ' • . . -
^ *
\ .__.__-_ , - . . : . '
REMARKS
Finish 1045
Installed 2 3/8 in.ID PVC; Slotted From35' to 30'
02 ppV -•-•--:"-
Fred C. Hart Associates, Inc.A016a
Alleqheny County Health Department ' MW''- 4 **J.OCAHOM ' /». i « . n . ' tU»Ar«OM»OU««el 7?1 4'Ohio River Park /<:i •*BHIVVIMO A««h«V . , • OAttSTAIITla . -•»• «INI»M«O UlVfiltXM OIH* TO «OC*
Pennsylvania Drilling Company 26 Sep 7927 Sep 7S0"™ 41.0 \-n.iUMaiou.~tMr. . . . . . . o.»ruMiu U«U.»TU«.IO co-.
B Drill s_-*« 7 ."*»*"" "«»•-' Hollow <?tPm A.i-arc , . t t ""*'8 ft.""" 22*° '""""'*
"tt<M-i** 1"* I ._. „ , _ B. Gollihue»*-»*•» 24 in Solit-Spoon ,,.CT0. '. — r—ln vimi.i x- lottaxt IdH lo*O» 30 ' °*
!i i
— s
->
— to
L
—20
—25
-=-30
•i»—vl»
to. t
oe.
~
CM
CO
•*
in
vo
»
bO10
K?
IO
COCO
COCO
COCO
^f
3s
in
Or- 1
in
in—- i
un
in
Hi
1,1,
2,5,5
1,4,
3,2i3
2* '
1,3,3
Dorrler
LOGOF BORING
DESCRIPTION
Black. TopsoilCoarse Sand and Gravel Cobbles, Red •Bricks and Large Pieces of Concrete
Very Soft Fine Sandy Silt (Wet With VeryStrong Odor)
VOID
Firm Brown Fine Sandy Silt (Wet WithStrong Odor)
Loose, Brown, Silty Fine Sand (Wet,Organic Odor)
Dense Brown Coarse Sand and Gravel
REMARKS
Start 1145 Hrs.Difficulty DrillingHole Straight
Rods Dropped From6.5' to 8.5'
v
Drill Rig Chatter
loo—
V
I
J
^
Fred C. Hart Associates, Inc.PROJECT r;o. A016a
Si32
1
• •
t H-u» u.O
- 35•*mm
H*
1-40
^K .
mm~rmf mr
UO.J
7
;•
SA»
a.h
COCO
MPL,
2*-i*o- • .
-
E3
"•&•-z 5 Sss^7,1640,22
LOG OF BORING MW
; DESCRIPTION •"
Dense Brown- Coarse Sand and Gravel (Wet .With Strong Sweet Organic Odor)
Boring Terminated
- • . v - '' ••
•
• \• ". ' . •
"*• • ' -
• . " .
- ' *
<
•
** ' • • ;
1 •• * . ' . * ' ,
56 -flfi
•4"REMARKS
Plugging Tool GotStuck Inside Augers;Had to Pull All Augers;No Sample at 40 Ft.;Hole Caved Re-rilledHole to 40 Ft. NextMorning Installed2 3/8 in. 1C PVC,Slotted From 40 Ft.to 35 Ft.
'• H22a
Fred C. Hart Associates, Inc. . .
Allegheny County Health Department MW - 5 ' " ' " ' • 'LOCAT'OM tb««A«IOMKH<flCI _- _' _
Ohio River Park >. '19-sB*H.LIMaA«thC* '• • . MTISfMITtB OAII »IN4.»il» «.-»HTIO- Oi.r- TO «K«
Pennsylvania Drilling Company 27 Sep 79 27 Sep 7S ""^ v_..._,«« .«,._,., . ' M-1M. 7
«,. , o,«» HollQW Stem AuQer_ niT<nu-Jlt '""o1 , •' ' - -
eA«_« ——— j«.0« ————— |o«- —————— B. GolHhue• — - 24 in. Split-Spoon IMftmit ——
S »3 *
.
•
14*111410
• .mmmm
mm*mm
—— 5•mm
mm>
mmmmmmmmmmm
mmm
mmm
—tommt
mm>
mm
mmmmm
mm*mmmm-
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mmmmmmm
mm
f— 20mmmm
mm
mmmmm
mm
mm
— 25•»••
mmmmmmtt
mm•mmmm>
— 33.mmmmmmm
mmmmm
mm)
mm
j «».«-, 14Q I0"0- 30SAWVLtt
i
"•
CM
CO
*
in
vor
r
coCO
COCO
COCO
COCO
COCO
LOn
i—
in
ini—t
in1-4
in1-4
in
o
Ni«nn•11UIU
•VM'IW**
6,7,g
3,5,5
3*
3,4,6
2,2,4
18, 3£35
-
R. DorrlerLOG OP BORING
DESCRIPTION
Stiff Brown Clayey Silt (Dry, SlightOrganic Odor)
Medium Dense, Brown Silty Fine Sand(Moist With Slight Odor) ——
• • i . ' • *
Loose Grey Fine Sand Some Silt (Wet.With Slight Odorf^
Dense Brown Coarse, Sand and Gravel (WetWith Strong Sweet Organic Odor) .
' \ :
,7 flMnh
REMARKS
Start 1030
^
1-
R1g Chatter
2219.—-,-
_/
T
Fred C. Hart Associates, Inc.A016a
CASING
j•-M*T
l .
H
0 "*
•35
*mmm
—40-mm
-mmtmm
•mmmmmm
mummmm,
mmm
mmm.mimf • .
m^mm**mm>
^mmimm
mmmr-
mmm
W
•-••
mmm*
«_^M-
mM'.
mm*.
mm*m ^
mm
mmmmmmm, -•
mm
mm
mm
mmmmt
—
—
SAMPLESJ
d
7
.
j
COCO
'Ik1
n— i
PENETH
RESIST
BL/6IN.
17, 3C32
LOGOFBORING MVJ - 5 CRiGi ... - =
DESCRIPTION
' ; • ' . . . . ' • • • .
Boring Terminated •
•• ' . ' . . ' •.'"'•
• , . * _ •' . • .-
* • • ' * • '
. BC" 4RIOO
( '*' t'REMARKS
Finish 1130Installed 2 3/8 in.ID PvC; Slotted From34' to 29' -
"*
t .
. • ,
i
i
30
Fred C. Hart Associates, Inc. ,A016a
*~OJtCt ' . so-iMOWl UKHJ! lr<,l
Allegheny County Health nop^rtmont ***=• 6— — pj-th ————lOC-flO» ' l..V«r.ON MUIICI Tig Q V'"""
Ohio River ParkOm.UMa«etNC* * ' OAf.STAHT.O t»» MH >«»••» O , CUM»«.f"U« Ok»rn TO «OC<
. " Pennsylvania Drilling Company 27 Sep 7927 Sep 7£ """ 31 . 5 ' .•WWM..ouMc-r B Dr|11 „_..„ -
*«kAMnT~-i o»«.r Hollow Stem Augpr / ' ' 'fi,ttull' ""*'
CAJMH& W.MMttJM 1 M*IQMf ___ -—-_-_- -
«A_ .» 24 in. Split Spoon < INk>ieTO, ———
MMH^BH
•»
*
• a
—5
—— IS
—20
—25
—— 35-1
uA-n.is
_b
t— l
CM
CO
*
in
vo
r
COV?
COCO
COCO
COCO
COCO
COCO
—a
\
t-4
in1-4
in1—4
in
ri
in1-4
<_ jj _
6,6,7
3,3,4
10 '
3,3,5
10
18
22.0'
B. Gollihue
R. DorrlerLOG OF BORING
DESCRIPTION
Firm Brown Clayey Silt (Dry, No Odor)
t • : * *
Loose Brown Silty Fine Sand (Moist,Slight Odor) ——
Dense Brown Coarse Sand and Gravel (Wet,Slight Odor)
Boring Terminated
——————— = ———— B9 ———————— £fi
REMARKS
Start 1400 Hit HardSlag, Moved 4 Timesto Avoid Slag
•' ' ^
Installed 2 3/8 1n.ID P.VC, Slotted From29' to 24'
Finish 1515 - .^-
X
J
J
X.
j M M / '} J .
Fred C. Hart Associates, Inc.' A017a
.
*•«_
f
S —— ,
"M3XCT i . . 10 AIM MO MW-IA 'NEVILLE ISLAND
tcc_r«,« OHIO RIVER PARK «---««-• i 715>4
u ;»*- PENNSYLVANIA DRILLING COMPANY °9/e7/79 7/28/7Q ' ""Sfi V
B DRILL . M--«Iw.-Hot-Mo*.,, HOLLOW STEM .AUGERSe»**<» •——_„__ n tu ulviu (
CO-r-VI.O »«m>uM»
n 20———————————— 1 ————————— : —— 1 ——— ———— ——— B. GOILTHHF******" 24 in ^Pl IT «iPnnN ————— 'tt in. OrLi 1 5rUUIN i«u»ietuM p nr|i•A_-v4H-_~_,« |M,CN. -J40 |o«ji. 30 . K* UUI
a
5 •
/
MHM
.g
—5
-" ..'— • i
—15
—20
—25
— 30
__*m.
>->**it\
'io
1
2
'
3
4
5
wm
SS
SS
ss
ss
ss
MltUV-.P1
1.5
1-5
L5
L.5
L-C
(••hi 1ft*.
"«*'»'.
UV.IM
.
4gn
A
• A
65
\
8io24
?RLER
LOG OF BORING
DESCRIPTION
.STIFF BROWN CLAYEY SILT (MOIST, NO ODOR)
1 • . . • ' • - •
LOOSE BROWN FINE SAND (MOIST, NO ODOR)
LOOSE BROWN CLEAN FINE SAND (WET, NO ODORi
[ . • - '
DENSE BROWN COARSE SANDY GRAVEL(WET WITH ORGANIC OD5R)
BORING TERMINATED
fiR
BIO
REMARKS
START 1615
*•
END OF DAY -
FINISH 1000INSTALLED 2 3/8 IN. IDPVC, SLOTED FROM 25'TO 20'
00232-• ' ' . i
Fred C. Hart Associates, Inc.,A017a
»»»>«ef . BOIMMO.MO .« I A. "" "NEVILLE ISLAND MW-2A =
lOCAfuj* - - . »fc4*»A*m*»>ou*»CiCOTTAGE AVE ?
OAlhUMt AAffeCV . . , • • * • - O-bft ftfAMMtf UAlk
PENNSYLVANIA DRILLING COMPANY v 9/28/79 9/
^ ""' B DRILL . M-U,. .**»— "-i «-• HOLLOW STEM AUGERS • '., , i IL: TfOm«» • —————— .
OO/7Q Stff» nf't \28/79 25' — — v
4 .___ __ >
• • . 19'
^ ———— , r. — - ,-.-, ----- ~ r B> GOLL.HUE»— «• ,24 in. SPLIT. SPOON ^ 7 ————ti-n_-t4*-«ii»in» |M*I<SM» 140 ' |OHO» O * *
'? to
i"-
* •
N
Oirliiit
——5
5".
—20
—25
—30
——is
•.,»~vrt
jj
1
2
3
4
I*
ss
ss
ss
ss
«*
9•mt
..5
L5
..5
L.5
«t ••in,'tWlu•**«t**4
V
819Iy23
DORRLER
LOGOFaOniNG
DESCRIPTION
BLACK TOPSOIL
'STIFF MOTTLED TAN AND LIGHT GREY SILTYCLAY (MOIST, NO ODOR)
. ' * " •
MEDIUM DENSE BROWN SILTY FINE SAND(WET, NO ODOR) ——
DENSE BROWN COARSE SAND AND GRAVEL- .
- . . . - . . - .
BORING TERMINATED
Bll
. REMARKS
START 1130 HRS.
MOVED TWICE TO AVOIDHARD MATERIAL AT 3 FT 'DEEP •
; _ ' • • . . . , ' . . v .
DRILLED TO 25', PLUGTOOL GOT STUCK INSIDEAUGERS, LOST 3 HRS HADTO PULL AUGERS
FINISHED 0 1530 HRS.
INSTALLED 2 3/8 IN. IDPVC, SLOTTED FROM 25'TO 20'
.'
• • ' S-aniQQ233 '
•O-
C. SOIL-GRAIN-SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVES
100231)
UiiTu ,
]%Z' iiME%l_jETZ7i _.__I . ta L__.... _ j •! -,.«.«,,,-,,,..,:,. J
. ! ! i i • . ' ' ' , • • '' \ ' • ' ' • • ' ' . . • • . : '•. ... _,--... .... - •"———I- t ••:'"'-? v - : - \ . ;.-••• ,- ••• • ' .......,.;. . . . .
V J
Zfl(/£L * ••
——— , . -...--,T
i ;- - - -
1 00235
U.S. iI.V:r.'A|iii.:|r\
i:,:. ., ..
. .,... ........
;...;. . . . . . . . ,,.,; ..... ..„.......
Sl'.TCRClAY
I .-.. GO
I""
7.0
, ..a.Sr-v.VtiAROtt.-Vial.'E
-6- '
•r:"..:..:' r.TK'i .t.r:.:,;..._ ,:.;..!: ; :\ ':;';:: ......i!.;z..,.
_-Zi;:; • •!••:.-.:;_..j.:.:....s:..._.,:.:.v:,. :.;... :.ic: :.::;....__!r^triv; 7 :"r~-i;r;~f.'[ ^ "-r :•-" - Srr''—-.:rr.7:::-;.:;7-T.-'.][
.. j .:.-.,.
:-»-
in :'.-,. • tC v •> 001•111 -.., M/l ir;:,:iir'-•.•! Ml. •
_ _,———————........... i Li „.. ..:... .SEEE: I
-I'-: • -iftf-1! I
_....,_f-A.M««a ^ .«M, :t:I:^y j |M . 5J--^<1.^ ! • BE/W^E /l/a LL.-/u A se SA*-Z>
C2 AR I 00236
• -•-• . •..•.(,-•«...•:; •-••.•• -.• -. j;__& . . . . • • ' ' . ^___y. ,.,..,........—— -j-.—,—— - -..--, |; : _• ;;! !• • • .^ • i j...... ., ._ -, . J - . .... ..i..:.: ...; . \..;i . . . . . ....,___._ . ..j .,, .... . . ., .
_. .... .r •-•-. l •
tMf I?O JOILCl.ASS!?ICATIO'i tVS '.!
.....I..,. .. .. ;, f,.f. . ._......_ ._S.. ......... ,
—— t- •• M. » :i . , . .... V -j.,.. ...... -.-- -r- ••- 4-H-fr —— •— r-- — : I'' ' •
. ——— ————— •44- ----. -
i .; ;. i~- 1- : '
?.\r.i.->te '-..:• "i-.- ,j-.-. .0': . • . ••!•-.•:•! s--M '• . ' ! *-:-v' : ••• V^: '•• : ;•~ ~ ~ • - - ' ' ; . . . . . . ;
.... .'..j:._...:::•- U
flRI00237
w.M-SJZE n;37RiBUT!Giv
;
«•— .7. •:•" • ""'.T/viTTr1— "---, Tr*.~. " -•-,-;••—. - .....-._,_ ^ _ .,' -—•LtS ;. "> .:--r ' i"" m r •j yiioVfVTi'r'". - _ '~ ""''iT """" w 2 f ! __ •
'.6- V .r- • ••• -j- MI «.•*"• i.', •«•'?:. Jj-io <M •!.•»*«..•,! a JO.< " ' J " t " ^ '-"'-
. ± . . . . . .. .. — i :-..:...:, . . . - I . - . . ; < . . ;, y K i . . ; 1 v. . . ., . , ; ... i : = : .
M |—_ p .......... _..-• ..i _...:. |_r:..... -...., ,:.JV. ..:-........,.,:;....... . ...._i j _,.,-........ . . . . . . . . . . . ,...!_.. - ...-..., ...... .\ . . . : , . - . . .
-- •(..,.......:. . 1: — ...... — i. ,.' ..: !.
•' ' • ' ! ' • ' • • ' • . ' '\. i •-_.„ .. ^...... f... ............. .^. ..... . ...... ..... ...-.. . . _ _ - .
. - • • . ' ' i : .2-.C !M :•} . f
J V,-.q.Vi
fflW-J
1
-
a.vri.e.; :••.•'•• i •;...6(W ,..:.. .._.._r... ...„__4 —— --....— ———
1
S VBV.i.
.....
. •;: t:'..,ie\ \
.. _...-. . . — .:.. ... ... — . ',. _ ........ ............
•. . • '
-IV1— - —
••<.. ; - -:•
•.TT..:'i! (u. , -..,
1-1
I
' !
V W. " I * ' ' * 1 ' ' ' " '
:.:....,.. ... N; : • --- ;-^-: • i - :.... i ;:....-...: ..,...._..... ....... -"-JV- ^ QV y- ;; ; - •_- '-- :;:"yy-- ;;_
(..r . , . . . . . , . : • : .«.; ,.• . . .: ; . \_^p;
I:.-- ...-: If.titi-iv
P T; I.V..-.I
'.f ''It ':.•'• •'•• }••:•:• .Ol i . . •- ••'••'•.CM.''-. ^ • . • A^'-•• : ::._•.<•<, '- '_ ,
5.__ / "--/6.i" ! Q.l ifD'V/ri bewse fi .ou/A]) /iry /="//«£ . ........_'.. . i •
..... . ... ..f———... .— • .——.—...—.__.: f ' ____ _
AR I 00238
D, WATER SYSTEM DATA FOR SYSTEMS
NEAR NEVILLE ISLAND
.'.Ie-85
Ss.-LU=3
r. • UJ o. . «Co c. UJ
ts >-io ^
Ul
R•••f • r.... ..
ecg.
le
oOJ
tr)
enZ
«" *«r_TO)
o
«»- t.O 03
giII
UJ
to
l CI C 4-» «/) O O<U I 03 >+- ro ••=• +3
03 J_ L. C U» O W «rt «4-4-» O f2 w o E J-'i-re «*- r— EM O J S - Q J O 'S ro • IT- t. c _. 4-» •!- •—
«*- <OfT3' O •-• O <rt t- O---*- J_ C«4-i«- t- U >>O.S-
I/I «3 «O 03 IQ r- O*>—'I/I 4-«O 4= C 4J ra W f— 03 C. cn i ic ro c jc _. f «o t3 o
03 O) E O 0)U*D *f-U<0 C C &• J_ +J O r- X•-- E T" >r" _= C "3 «r- O
o+^coio§o'0«^i. op- v CLCn-P OJT3 •' - "0) T5 -M ro O) ,» CD OJ u> 03 CT3
mtmmr «p f ^v ^^ «^ I——— • ^M
CVJ- <OCfOUL.roO
f- •— Wl io 2r-X_--3+-_,S »— <C JT -r- QJ C UV>re •+•> »-M U- i «/) 10 u roC 3 O O J C ••- O "D -MO cr ex w ** i— o *-»••- QJi-03 0)Cra'>-_.Ci-03J-JJ *" •"• OJ > OJ O tt*»— O
_"- cnc <ac_.»"""aj-3*— I—
+J o T? e?>4- -P- c xto 01 OJ O O 3: ro '- -f- i—•P CM-DO. C -Of—o c _. •-> cu
0> * ro O ' -O • OJ Si_ tn •it-r-EL.CL.O <O '* C ' O O 03 *^* roUl Ol OJ 0*0 J- U -M i- 03— M- as 4J i— o i—
H-TJ~3 E «0 J= «4-T3 10«fl 03 OJ O O> • C ro4-* «r— in 3 -«•»-
I »
;•§- _c._a ** --
!"=*•« +. _ 5 ;, 55 o C «•*-ro -= r- O i— -O ••-••- "- C__urourooo«4-3:'i-
CJ
CM
CMV)
CM
•— voIT
CJ Oi 03• C +JU 0) 1C 03QJ c t. a«s 'c i$ inTJ «*- 03 •C O V) CM3 3VO£ «? O-M
"Oc __ro O
i -a-i- a>v OJ C IO .OVi- 03 O3: _• V O 3 4- -M 03-o^v2 _. (y D to
•M «_.— __ __ «0 V) J_;<J i-v-4- -3 o re +J +•> IA
I » «r*•O I- W-3
U i-ajco 03
T- XTJ OJ « 03 O "- IC "- <O +•» r— V) +•> 4-•i— E ro 10 </> to -M u>l/> <U > > ro i— C O•f- _= _. T- O CL 3 03 Q.•a in ro 4- F o 30) (O U O U U r— S._.r->-= ro _. CJ 0<«- Ocm- M jc i— »»-«»-o -M «*- a>3 O 03 •*•• • QJC 4J re _, C S- C r~~3«O ~3 03 «O 03 O IO •-»
</) CJ ••- 4- T3 C J- -i- r— Of Ci— ro "O OiOH-JES. _. • 3
r- «O O «— O 0)
CMO
03
V
_. oOJ CM O>r- O.5 OJr-
O__
C O••- C
Dl
.O r o S _ r o - a 0 3 U O r _ S _ 4-1 r— •Ol/l t.I—-30J C-Mi-Wr-Q-S 3 f— +* —»~3 OJ
•MJ5 ^_ -_ —•M V) ro ra _- " "3 p v» Vl'p " - E OJ' 3- 01 0)4J e t— c L. -a u "o -. 3 _. .i- 3 TJ a. _. 4J« ' uO>r9*<oaJCUOJU.oai4J(j*r->f-ra rout
S _= ro U OJ Ol<+- (O O T3 -- t. C (O T3 S. _. • n3_• 4- -M L. .«- V) C - r- --J <+- O O -O O O r- 03 +J
- — C OJ = O> <g •>_,<*-(. • JSU ««3 p- "O04-»ojcSro,o_ -r?t3_-o r-'*5J'r'g<*-
VI X
3
-O
j. +. * (-) • C3 I T_ 03 in. W <4- O C- «rt • i— E3T-4-J.03 O **- <V-* C 3 -O O U i- ro QJ 034J i—oj f . •u~r><-«/>uo3*Jc
1 < «i— 03 -r" Crt'i— ' * (O O <O *r~ — 03 -r— L.
•M T_ nj O O w 4J i+_ 3 o in o •*-••— *OOJ* <O O1 U r- (O C O •>- -- 4> O *OfT3OC C (O S- £ Oi-OJM- _.<_=•!- -O C O OJ•-••p- OJO »O«3"-O.C 3 +Jr-CrO -OT.
J. X-N -o 4 ••- 4J O >*- -r-rowOJ-OC- - - - - - - - - ro fl
2O+*<UCsrO.O r->WJ! ^ • ••HJ'u r a j = r a C u o w i 6 a i i 03 «<*-«—' 3 x-3 3ucnoj«i-OJ3'i-i.+-i/» o.** 4J , s- o03 a S O. i— E-M 4-roC ro X 0) J_ ro ••-4- C *OJ(O -i- -F- <OC3'-*^-r- OJ*J30J-3_U'»-ci_S5in>— intao in ro 3Z 3 Or- oai i_ T- ai 3 « — i - o o a i r g c o ^ <+- y oj-t-i . o vi _= »•-•-o OJ w> J. -3 •»- i. c c +*C*-ra3CW10Jr— 4J.C4J q_ -- . -r- >, Ol -r- O•t- _Z J3 Qtft4-OC(JQ. C UV)._3JC_.OJin U W t, ia n3 1- 03 -r- • O t- O» C O .4^0^-
OJ i. •-• 4-> > 4J 4J _. WS-f O 1. -i- -M .-O•Oro-SOJ O"-CCWOC4-<*- vt—^OJl/l
ICL4J p OJ 3*f-'» <O_ V> fO_ fc. t.-3 -3 .
^^ ^1 ~r^ mm mm if* ^mf mm •*—: T— w< ™ ~ir ^ri mmm wXO1&4JpOJ3*f><^{d V)<O fc.l.(J«/>
«rt4--O.p.jQT>-J<U •»-•_aj 4J *j -g -o rrWt<0 M O W r O C O J OJ4J*J-O«— 3= in_30J-303CT3r-CC
. - i4J .1- ro ro -f- +» -OTJ 4-OIOO-0 3-*-1 ~_rOt-OJr— Xrg«f-C<_.C:i--f-a3l/1f—rO</></»C3 o-i— <*- o S ia ra _- 3 Q-+J in •<- m.r- •-• ••- ro
in• '
CM
o•
cneatui .
co
Ul Olr- G. <U
-- ro O I V)rO S__=i— i- 3•i- OJ O OJ•O ** ro *•> > C
•«*- fO ro-, ,c_ cs. aj m p vi-OJ oOJCM'f-f—
•o u oi ra -o cC OJ OJ S- <O r- OJ3 1—4- 03 ro t.2r- -W O O S-
O U~ (O 3 •-- 3C3 O U3 r~ +- +- U
02
<5 e • m
in
_§
cn
«4- J-O ~Vs
p2
t/)
+* ••- lC~3 rO C O ' VI- -- - 03 VI • fc...epojcici-ajui' t. c >f-
Vf»- L. 10 O am- _. OJ 03 ro d E J-10 4J 03 01 4JCOJCLU14JUC3-M-- IO T_ C -Z JO •-- .1- >, Ci— »- -f- VI ~3
— SE « VI 3 «/>«*- 4.7 OJ i- C 3 "Of- C3 O E ro -r-T- 4- <*- Q O O XJ rocn o. C 03-o t- 4J C .S i— in^~ "" ~" ~ — — ~ — 'c.K«£_^_'^__o3a>JE "3 *" x "p "cf
1C «p- O QJ 4J 4J C P I— « P i _ ~vi cn o. 03-o t- 4J Ct. ro 03 1C -= 03 (. ••- 0303 P -3 C.-3 4-> U i— C P (C P T34-» u c _. p a.u3t-J_o--c4-»C .or &. • 3 4-> _.— >*J *> «OP •>•*- X PCMU « U
C <*-+»</] »OJlfr-«— flag 4J
C L. r- P --P T3 4-p a.u3t-J_o--c -TCO * . 03 J_ (O t- 4J 03TJ p c >flJ • OJ i- 'OTt
•*-*<C 3 4J VI ~3 fc. _VI p- S= *J> -O <C t. ~- O.:-o 03 rq p M p c 03 flj > 03 x fc.
'<UE43_, «SPX:**«P-4JpTJOhi IOCVIL_ _ _ .4J T- 10 x: «f- _ «r- 03 vi o 03 •in0> i-J-3C V» ~3 C
c -opa»a3"
_P +•» • O*J U4J «O 4- r— «r- 03 "O „?CL c -o >o«r--3-_pa>
03 •i-
£E =u s a. p p*f> _=IS fc. fc. TJ **" °w . o ~l-TJ P- 3 <O 3 P U ~3 «„_ro C • JC «*- P r- C C. fc. •-- +* "JJfcl ™~- © .r- 4J 51 fc. •••-• _T p (- 2
fc. 03 03 T3 03 U- 3 T- D. 03 O)T> fc- P 3 P 3S-il5tJ«Ti v, 35 -g cc^cre p- 10 *q _a OJ ra C3 CM cj -a ra p c3 fc- > 43 4- f t.«—OJ 03 fc. O O0) •-» p re c 4J oj c«t-4-"i-"-3X"D4Jfc.V)03P 4-* P i—«— 4Jro "- «r- U P p fc. •*- t- «*- 3 «*- CJ «P- «P- 3e_ E is ro *4- ra 4-> 4- pcC4^i-i-ai4-vi-_
in
in
ccn inVIOJ
tn OJr-w •- _• Jo >
t- I-.3 5 -— So.'20.' > •
5*0) T3*O C «1S S-_ WP--3 Eo v «n c p
O 1 flj ~- C 0301 4- 4-> (O J_0) C __ _
JC O QJ OJ 4J -O in ro 03 in ra- .4JJ.4JT- IO C CM . OJ ICT3 •— ». *a re p r- o ro *-* 01 __ o -r- --*—T3 • N ro «O S •r-*-st^.4J»f-
*— •»* 03 V« -O C E 4- r- C -0 C •*-~ P pro
"O CTT3 rx CM — 1 CO'0 f VI 3-f- OJ*r OJ i. •— • c c cn _. j_ 4J c •--«— » * lOrO(O3QJ(OO>r-l_>-
C V) 4J O J- E P4J*Q303_.pO
C O . O>««- E "O r- f «f-"OJro4J-C
.•r--3 «3 3 " O J r o
0) 01 C P O>.i- 1- in >^ *O C P t. C«r« C «i- •—• 'JZ •>-'
.»V103'i-<Q13 t-
V> O in p C r— 4J 4- «i^_ _ VITJICt'P-fCC L.V)
i-O3t-4->4-Cn3OCLO3 COJ~3P-P-Up-PO OJ4-> -.-O-i-ECS-OJ-r—OJ-34->p-OV) (13 "4- 4J ro i—
O3 ' J_<*-a3<t-_Lc-P-OJ-3«-'VI I*- O5in u C u> o ro in C 3 C o 4J•p- -p-VIVIVJ T>flJOJVI-«-}P<J
03 V) <_ O J Q JCCi— rtJ-O •!-•!- fc.jviia _ _ _ _ . __K - - fc> *i~ CLTJ > 4J IO IOJO 0><O4J>r— Pp ** 0) ~3 C «r- VI Ol O *i- 'T-«^-VO 3--~-V» O4J»p- ro-p- C Q.««- D.
>-^ IO QJ-— p E rC •r- ~' C Et- C'p-fc.cj_i:-^.aifc. -p-3-oO3 p- - 4J 03 03 C4->CrOO(-U1'i-OJ••••p-W»T_+•*«>>« o'c-o p--3'p--3-a
-S 3 JO «r- 3 O»CM *J (J-i-'f- O V>v_v» ro
in
i•o
fc. S4Ju_a «j cn oj*• !E w -.'u e. o
T3* p cVI -P- IOfljt!OCOr-3 "CMP <Ur--•$•
J-
iSo.38-C • (0 03•p- S 3-a
03
OittGMAl
1
QjSVIs_.1IZ
•-- <*.o
ato_M3
4-C
(OOf
^t»>0
O.
~
-.
cn
cEXgeOlVI >03
•b
4- .ra3
3£-£
"
£5trt>•</»
- v>ro
-_ Ccn flj i cngj
JC-"-*
O> 3 4J C ••-
01c'bpp—
u_s
"3"84Ju03tfc»
CUl
lg
O*- rob P EJ= Ul4- -3b C
Oi P raC 4-•»- cVI VI PVI b bro 03 -P-0.4-- p-_r"SCITSoj 24- cn_=1 C "t*?4J roCJT VIp U-QX bJZ & •—-
'•i- C 4-
! £3.?Pi a£~3
V»p- CO•p- 6L*.— *T3
Vt C
j._ainin
i
41 raC 4103 b cn_= _- c4J 4- ••-
-/ >
VIVIroQ.
5bp•p—ba.•
VIbCI4Jf—m•r-«4-
(Oe
remov
inQJSO)
p- QJro vt
remov
ncrea
• «p-a>VI P0)4-
ra T3cn aC 73S "°T3 tAC-p-ro '03C Cp *f-i- O03 IE5 °»f Ul01 b3 CJ2£
•odl~3ro
3roroen
01Q.S3VIVI3oT3(O
(O3•r—VIOJb
C ;.
»fl>VIOJro01c . •
*
1Olc•p->OJ I/Ip
01
TJJCM fl|•r--Ol_tm tmmmOJ3-o_, 0c inOJ4-«l-
4-VI VI*^~ 3. ">b UOJ4-> OJfO bJz
£*!*«*s-a5~- (0 r— <UV» ^-3VI CJ '<*- bro 4- ro
Ul 03 0155»S'3
i
. -j-CM
VI— — .OJ3
CMd
b014-
i
132
1>4->VI
...
c'» paiin in OJ.3 Ci—c «2 -p-•»-+->
(0 41at u zpBM ^J - •
** T3•C • CU w» ra•f- 31JZ O fl2 * *SM **P ><3
•
j
VI•ora1-2
.
>
V
032«»-'b1-*
§ •P- 41C^8•r_ O•p— "*vi u
•2g-3 SP^_C
•» IO4^ •S CJo
^1*
V) <O.3"°4g''bra oScb bp p«*- 1*-
•
bVI P(Q (J5
03E-a03 •»-4J XVI P
5
a» 0)h~ f*o
• |M
P U'•MT303 IO<*-55VI
•S 4-
Is~!"S OJc>*. •
,
b '- .-•2"c*b raa.vt» b4- OJ01 4JP~ ~•5«£_.*i_+* >4-> § •
10 b 41
SOJ OJvi OJ^gc-P ro«t-U Oi-i-
P SP^P " "flJ•0 b £C-P" <0
"-l^1-0, 0Vt 03555 .
f
^ '•
.-
f
'_
04
.>'• ' ri•«:'••• S
. «l-f*' ii&"
/ 8s
>»__"iVI
o•p-Q
.-«..' ,
m+^
|0
J
C .
|ao
(A
S*15;••• .•** •cro. E
'C5
_
"
1inOJ4-
£f?ucg.O)b1
*
oatj.
Oi^TI
o« ^CM
IO
^*
5
v
%«
cfN
cnr*5«s
dE*»S
. -. •- : .' • '•'.* * '"O -'«?i
Or-OOOoOCMOOOOOC3 — C30OC3C5
'.'
P- - - CMCM CM O CMOmOCM«3-CMOr-Op-OOOOCTiOOOOOoooooooooo
. • ' •• •' ev • • ' • •p- IT) OP— O O CO «3- IfV O 'p— CMOCMOOCOOOVOOOoooooooooo
. • ...
CM inCO -CM f- -•r- CO 10CMCOCMCM • O O •Or-oomoo oooooors. • o «3- o • .oooo-.zooo!S
v
r- CM.in CM in in o inoooor^oo OCMOCMOOCMOOCMOO00,00000000
«MP- in oP— o o m ovin o r- CMO(— OOr-OOCMOOoooooooooo
CM^ ) 3 U - O 3 p"* l )C3 f mt mm) ' t* 3 3 3' J
O^OOCMOOp-OO
: ^ • •' ." 6 O3 S
O E 3 ~3 >»« 3•p- E 3>p-'p- U4-<>- bCSf-Eb 3 ra C 03
• O*r>igpP~3UbV>
_?r»(35C z '<!o
D5 SRI002UU
UJ
.5 •UJ
1-4 ".
LU '-Z
S.Ulz
1OL2:21 ^r- "0.LU
1 .' "
UJto .
LU
•*Z
SsS"50LU •;'S . •;•Ul
•: .
1
Ju.VI41
, 4? '
5.,5»/»
0in
s°s
co
e
o
VI
H2*S
i~ t
*•• •*'•••M •
roc •1-11
J3. Q.Q.
VI
1broU^•j,
•CT414-
C•f—b0
0
sCM*v.
mCMfc
cn^ *
^ *
S
cnr*.
o»r*.fcfc
cn
CM
-Js
. g.
roa
r- inp- o m ino o o CM.o o o o
CM
c*c*°.'~'zzzo
.
"Tn in,— o un ino o OCMOOOCJ
CMo'esooZ Z ZZ
CM •UT> r—CM IO •«O O O00 »^O O Z Op 0 r^
CM ',• i • «ooooz z z z
CM -r o in• oo •—. b-. .0.. • .S aiu c
C C X J=•p- ra o a. .b -a -S ro•OS*-*ct •-> « ouj _i 3u y-
...
• "
a.0.
phenoxys
o
0
gCMr-*
cnfcfc
cnr*.
S
-f
cnr*.
fc
cnr*.
S_jZ
4)
O
~o inin o0 0
CM0 0• .*z z
*"io inin oo o
<MCM «CM OO OO "Oo d
CM* \ *
0 0z z
CM*rx CMVO rfp- 0o od p
o o0 P-
Xai >in --O -P-1 •-«/>" " 0.» »h-CM CM
'.
. c
1OJO N
S -mmm- b 4J ,
5 *£
!. t- ',2 ^2 3 >,*4~» _ *f**
4J 0) ^b jr .aOJ Of roU OJ 4-*< P-- «u-C < 4-UJ OJ
41 -OfO -M «*-
J3 ^ I/I' 4J
• ~3 "O «P-OJ 01 S
. N N -i->» >» P-i-'i: i(Q tQ • *
- • • -U ~3 ' -3c • cra ra «
•3-3 >!J J •»•
0) 01 •"r- -- ftr- r- OJ •00 +*0 u ovt vt *JOJ OJ 41t'"" 'cL
S 4j»ra ra pvt vt c •1 I 1
dr— CM Z
O Cf»*"'
•*••• AR10021*5
________,————————————————————-———-—:————:———'<;---'- - —————— . .-. f - •„ &
• OATKI Junc 1S.« 1979 ' • /•. '•'.""• OftiGffJAt ..."-•
SUBJECT. Pittsburgh Drinking Water hAFO's Kos. 79060S-(01-99) VCA Analysis/ilall Datector .,:- \\
; Rick DreischCheaist
• TO: Ifeniel K. DonnellyChief , lab Section ,
t'f ' ' ' ' • \i:: John Austin / . ' • ': . i ^
Acting Chief*, 'Organic Analysis Unit ;
* • • . "
The analysis of nine (9) drinking water 'samples froa the Pittsburgh areaere giyen belov/. Twelve (12) organic compounds were four.d in. variousenounts. All ccrpounds v;ere found on the Hall Detector using a single
. identifying cclura, with the exception of Tetrachloroethylene, wherethe assistance of the J/ass Spectrometer aided in its identification. Thecompounds were identified by using e relative reference tir,e to an internalreference cc±pcur.d '(Freer.) tlT.e.. Listed belov; are ry findings :
Coispcunds: ; 790508-01 02 03 64 '05 -05 07 08 09' • ' •Kethylene chloride 48. 38 - 50 1.1 4 22 421,1-Dichlorcethar.e O.OS O.Oo 0.05 0.07, 0.1 .0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1l,l,l-Trichlorc tr__r.e 0.9 0.7 0.9 . 0.9 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.1 O.C3Chloroform . <0.05 5.4 2.9 7.9 8.3 0.6 - 0.6 0.5Trichlcro9trvler.e 0.9 0.5 0.5 '0.6 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1Bro-ofor_i - 2.0 1.3 1.4 0.8 0.1 -Tetrachlcrcethyler.e O.8.. 0.5. 0.5 0.5 0.08 0.1 "<0.05 <0.05 -Brcrodichloro-ethane - 7.1 3.9 8.6 8.9 0.5 - 0.4 '*0.3Dibrc.iochlcrp.7.et:_ir.e -r' 7.3 4.2 8.S ** 8.0 0.6 - 0.2Chlorobercer.s -• - - - - - - 1.1 0.8Ethanol or J.tethar.ol1 X - - - ' _ - - . ... -
KE, 11.05- , X X X X X X X XX
Eete-tich Lirlt <O.C1 ppb• ' - - - ' ' • - ' - . - • . . " . ' • . '
. • . • . ' .• • •
• Present in sufficient quantities to activate conductivity cell (indicatedby X) "Present <1 ppb based on 1,1,1-Trichloroethane response (indicated by X)
'ED:£d ' , '' ' " • " . ' . ' ' , . - -- -. ' " r
cc: ?. 0. lt_r_5or. • • " ' ' • •
EP* FORM lj:3-6 JREV. 3-76J \ m
07 - • ARI002U6
;- s; WAPOLIS FIELD OFFICE* REGION• ' ' . ' ' • " .-'?r':- • ' » ' - - . '
DAT.I June 20, 1979 •• . ' •-'•;.- • ' ' • ' ,- 'SUBJECT: Neville Island Water Supplies
John AustinChemist
Daniel K . Donnelly • • • , . ' . . -Chief, Lab Section -
• / . ' • « • . • ' " : . . .' i - . . - . - • ' . • ' ',
. * * - * * > • ' ,* •. •
The following samples were received;. ' - • • ' - "..
79060801 Robinson township W.T.P-., Raw79060802 Robinson Township W.T.E/, Finished79060803 Robinson Township Sunoco Service Station79060804 Robinson Township Authority'Bldg.79060805 Robinson Township Texaco Service Station .
79060806 . '• tfestview W.T.P., Finished79060807 West-view W.T ..P., Raw79060808 \WestviewWaterSys. Gulf Service Station . '79060809 tfestview Water Supply Sys. Texaco Service Station
Samples were analyzed for chlorinated solvents, benzene, toluene,alkyl substituted benzenes, indene and benzofuran by mass spectrci?.etryand purge and trap into a chlorine specific detector. Analyst'sreport on the determination of volatile halogenated conpounds isattached. The presence of alkyl substituted benzsnes, inder.e orbenzofuran was not detected in samples analysed by mass spectrcr.etry.No additional cczpounds were detected in the base extractable fractionsof samples 79G6C301,, 02 S 06. The following compounds were additionallydetected by purge and trap .into the mass spectrometer:
790608- 01 02 06 07 .Pg/1
Benzene / - <!*..- 1.3* 2.9* l.S*Toluene <1* 1.3* 1.2* 2.4*
. 2-ciethyl butane — 1-10 '.' •.— ' ---2-Eethyl propanol — -— —- 1-103-methyl-2-butane —- — —- 1-10Indene -— — -— S.A.Benzofuran g —- — —- S.A.Substituted benzenes —.-; -— — S.A. .
S.A. - Broken in shipment ••
* Quantitation value by mass spectrometer-^has hig!: uncertainty andwere not confirmed by normal gas chromatograph Aie to analyticaldifficulties. •
FORM U23-« |R£V. 3-7S) .
pa ARI002U
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
fiRIQ02l»8
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
ARI002U9
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK '
fiRl00250
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
SRI 0025 I