3.wave deformation.pdf
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
1/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
1
WAVE DEFORMATION
Prof. V. Sundar, Department of Ocean Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology
Madras, INDIA
1 GENERAL:
Wave deformation may occur due to
(i) Lateral diffraction of wave energy
(ii)
By the process of attenuation
(iii) Air resistance encountered by the waves or by directly opposing winds
(iv)
By the tendency of the waves to overrun the currents.
The important phenomenon in regard to wave deformations taking place in
the near shore zone is refraction, diffraction and reflection. This chapter deals with
these aspects together with breaking of waves and the changes taking places in
propagation of waves when it encounters currents.
2 WAVE REFRACTION
Variation in wave celerity occurs along the crest of a wave moving at an angle
to under water contours because that part of the wave crest in deeper waters will be
moving faster than the part in shallower waters. This variation causes the wave crest
to bend towards the alignment with the contours. The bending effect of the wave
called refraction, depend on the relation of water depth to wave length. If the angle of
incidence is defined as the angle between normal to the wave front and the normal to
the bottom contours, then the change in the angle with changing wave celerity is
given by
2C
1C
2sin
1sin =
(1)
T
LC= (2)
where C1, and C2, are the celerities at the points where has the values 1and 2.
This is the Snells law. The simplest case of plane waves approaching a straight coast
over a uniformly sloping bottom is shown in Fig.1.
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
2/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
2
Waves approaching the shore at right angles for which = 0, are slowed
down but not refracted. Waves approaching at an oblique angle, however, are
refracted in such a way that the angle is decreased, corresponding to the wave
fronts becoming more nearly parallel to the shore. If two rays, defined as orthogonal
to the wave fronts, a distance b, apart are considered. It can be shown that
ocos
cosobb
= (3)
Where bois the distance between the same orthogonal in deep waters.
A plot showing the coordinate positions of the orthogonal is for a given location with
defined bathymetry (depth contours) is called as a refraction diagram. Fig. 2shows a
typical refraction diagram. By drawing a refraction diagram the following
interpretation can be made.
(i)
Convergence of orthogonal (eg: towards a headland)
(ii) Divergence of orthogonal (eg: approaching a bay between two
headlands).
Convergence leads to increase in wave heights or Energy, resulting in shore erosion.
Divergence leads to decay in wave heights or energy, resulting in accession or
deposition.
The basic assumptions for construction of Refraction Diagram are,
Wave energy between the wave rays or orthogonal is conserved.
The direction of the advance of waves is given by the direction of orthogonal.
The speed of a given wave is a function of only depth.
The bottom slope is gradual.
Waves are constant period, small amplitude.
Effects of currents, winds and Reflection from beaches are negligible.
Graphical methods or computer program may be used for drawing the refractiondiagrams.
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
3/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
3
In refraction analyses, it is assumed that for a wave advancing toward shore, no
energy flows laterally along a wave crest; that is, the transmitted energy remains
constant between orthogonal. The average power transmitted by a wave is given by
CEnbP= (4)
Where n =2
1
+
kd2sinh
kd21
For deep water conditions, (2kd/sinh 2kd) 0 and hence
0C0E0b2
10P = ( 5)
(4)= (5) leads to
= C
0C
b
0b
n
1
2
1
0E
E
(6)
we know
02H
2H
8/02Hg
8/2Hg
0E
E=
= (7)
Henceb
0b.C
0C
n
1
2
1
0H
H
= (8)
Where,
==
sK
C
0C
n
1
2
1Shoaling coefficient and
b
0b = RK = Refraction coefficient
KSis given in the wave tables as a function of d/L Eq. (8) enables the determination
of wave heights in transitional or shallow waters, knowing the deepwater wave heightwhen the relative spacing between orthogonal can be determined. Refraction diagram
for Paradeep Port due to waves of period 8 Sec approaching from South is shown in
Fig.3.
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
4/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
4
3 WAVE DIFFRACTION
Diffraction of water waves is a phenomenon in which energy is transferred laterally
along a wave crest. It is most noticeable where a barrier such as a breakwater
interrupts an otherwise regular train of waves. In such a case, the waves curve around
the barrier and penetrate into the sheltered area.
A simple illustration is presented in Fig.4, in which case a wave propagates normal to
a breakwater of finite length and diffraction occurs on the sheltered side of the
breakwater such that a wave disturbance is transmitted into the geometric shadow
zone.
In order to understand more clearly refer to Fig.5, the origin of the coordinate system
is taken to be at the tip of the breakwater with the x and y-axes running parallel andnormal to the breakwater as shown. The regions may be idealized as follows.
(1)
The region 0 < < ois the shadow zone of the breakwater in which the
solution consists of only the scattered waves. In this area the wave crests
form circular arcs centered at the origin.
(2)
The region o< < (o+ ) is the one in which the scattered waves and
the incident waves are combined. It is assumed that the wave crests are
undisturbed by the presence of the breakwater.
(3)
The region (o+) < < 2is the region in which the incident waves and
the reflected waves are superimposed to form an oblique incidence and a
partial standing wave for normal incidence. Values of diffraction
coefficient, Kdwhich the ratio of diffraction wave height to incident wave
height are shown in Table.1in terms of polar coordinates normalized with
respect to wave length.
Calculation of diffraction effects is important for several reasons. Wave height
distribution in a harbor or sheltered bay is determined to some degree by the
diffraction characteristics of both the natural and manmade structures affording
protection from incident waves. Proper design and location of harbor entrances to
reduce such problems as silting and harbor resonance also require a knowledge of the
effects of wave diffraction.
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
5/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
5
The wave diffraction is governed by the Helmholtz equation given by
( ) 0y,xF2k2y
F2
2x
F2=+
+
(9)
F(x,y) is complex, and contains both amplitude and phase information. Fig.6
represents wave fronts and isolines of relative wave height for y > 0.
The solution for F(x,y) for engineering applications according to Penny & Price
(1952) can be obtained as follows.
First for large y, the relative wave height approaches one half on a line separating the
geometric shadow and illuminated regions (See Fig. 7). Second, for y/L > 2, Isolines
of wave height behind a breakwater may be determined in accordance with the
parabolic equation.
Ly
2r
2
16r
2
Lx += . (10)
in which R is obtained from Fig. 7for any value of relative wave height. R = H/HI.
The dashed lines in Fig.6compare several isolines obtained by eq.10 with those from
the complete solution.
Sample wave diffraction plots for typical cases are shown in Figs.8and .9. Typical
plots showing the wave height distribution inside Madras Harbour, Tangassery
Fishing Harbour, kerala and Visakhapatnam Harbour are shown in Fig.10, 11and 12.
Diffraction of waves around breakwaters
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
6/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
6
4. BREAKING OF WAVES
A ocean wave would break leading to the dissipation of energy under the conditions
listed below.
When horizontal particle velocity at the crest exceeds the celerity of the wave When vertical particle acceleration is greater than acceleration due to gravity When crest angle is less than 120o
When the wave steepness, 142.0L
H> (Deep waters)
142.0L
H> tanhkd (shallow waters)
When wave height is greater than 0.78d.
The Wave height at the breaking point:
If it is assumed that the waves at the point of breaking can be described by
linear shallow water wave theory, a rough estimate of the wave height at breaking can
be obtained. 2T2
goL
=
We know at point of breaking
8.0bd
bH =
The energy dissipation from deep water to the point of breaking is assumed
to be small. The shore-normal energy. Flux at deep water Eo is therefore equal to
energy flux at breaking point, Eb.
T2
g2gH
16
1oC
2oHg
16
1oE
==
and bgdb2
gH8
1bCb
2Hg
8
1bE ==
As Eo= Eband db= Hb/0.8
5/2g25.1
gT
2oH2
bH
oH
=
or
5/1
oH
oL50.0bH
oH
=
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
7/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
7
The breaker depth and the distance from the shore to the region of wave breaking is
found out as follows.
( ) ( ) 2/1ocos2/1
gd2/oCoHbH = (11)
where Hbis breaker wave height
Based on the condition Hb= 0.78d,
2/1
ocosbgd2
oCoHbKd
= (12)
Solving for dbyeilds
5/2
2ocosoCo
2H
5/4K
5/1g
1bd
= (13)
where
( ) ( )2
gT
bHmambk =
( )
= m19e0.18.43ma
( )1
m5.19e156.1mb
+=
and m = Beach slope.
As m approaches zero k=0.78.
For a plane beach where d = mx and m = tan , the beach slope, the distance from the
shore to the shoreline is
5/2
ooo2
5/45/1
bb
2
cosCH
kmg
1
m
dx
== (14)
Finally,
5/2
ooo25/1
bb2
cosCH
g
kxkmH
== (15)
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
8/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
8
Medium Slope
Medium H/L
Steep H/L
Steep Slope
Low H/L
White waterFoam
Mild Slope
Taking the beach slope, wave direction also into consideration has derived the above
formulation. Formulae for predicting the breaker depth proposed by several
Investigators are given in Appendix "A".
5. Types of Breakers
Breaking waves may be classified as follows
1.
Spilling breakers: Low steepness waves on mild slopes which break by
continuous spilling of foam down the front face sometimes called as white water.
Breaking is gradual.
2.
Plunging breakers: Medium steepness waves on medium steepness beaches curl
over. Waves break instantly.
3. Surging breakers: These occur with the steepest waves on the steepness
Beaches. The base of the wave surges up the beach generating considerable
Foam. It builds up as if to form the plunging type.
N1= 5.0
oL
oH
tan=
N2 = 4.0
oL
bH
tan=
N1> 0.5 to 3.3
N2> 0.4 to 2.0
N1>3.3N2>2.0
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
9/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
9
Galvin (1972) suggested that breaker type depend on the parameter2tanoL
oH
Where is the beach slope and Ho/Lois the deep water wave steepness. In lab tests
with plane concrete beaches, he obtained.
Parameter Spilling Plunging Surging
(Ho/Lo)/(tan2)
(Ho/Lo)/(tan)
These limits are only approximate. They were obtained for slopes of 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2
and may not apply outside that range. More fundamentally, the transition from one
type of breaker to another is very gradual and estimation of the limit is highly
subjective.
Galvin (1972) also describes a fourth category of breaking waves called as
Collapsing breakers. The collapsing breaker comes between the plunging and
surging breakers.
6. WAVES ON CURRENTS
Very often there will also be a current flowing in the direction of or at an angle to the wave
propagation. This current will influence some of the wave characteristics, and, in their turn,the waves will influence certain current characteristics.
Clearly, if the current is in the same direction as the wave propagation direction, the
wave height will decrease and the wavelength will increase. If the current is in the
opposite direction, the wave height will increase and the wavelength will decrease.
The wave celerity, in the absence of current, is given by:
C = /k
Where
C : wave celerity
: wave frequency
0.09
0.00048
4.8
0.011
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
10/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
10
k : wave number, 2/L
so = C k
For currents and waves C will change to , given by
C * = C + U
Where C*: wave celerity in case of waves on a current
U : is the current velocity component in the direction of the wave propagation.
The frequency will change to *, given by:
* = C*k = (C+U) k = + k *U
Where * : wave frequency in the case of waves and a current
This component, kU, is often called the Doppler effect.
If waves travelling initially in water with no mean motion enter a current, certain
changes take place in the wavelength and height of the waves. Let us consider the
case of waves propagating in the x direction encountering a current, U in the same
direction. On the assumption that the number of wave crests is conserved, it may be
shown that
K*(U + C*) = k C (16)
Where k, C refer to the wave number and velocity of propagation in the absence of
the current and k*, C* to their values when waves are superposed on the current.
For simplicity, if the waves are assumed to be in deep waters, then,
( ) ( )k
gC,
*k
g*C
22 == (17)
Hence, from eq. (16)
( )C
*CU
*k
k
2C
2*C +==
This may be written as quadratic equation in C*/C with the solution
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
11/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
11
++=2/1
C
U411
2
1
C
*C (18)
when the current is flowing in the same direction as that of waves, travelling, i.e.
U >0, the velocity C* and the wave length L* increases compared to their
respective values in still water.If the waves encounter an adverse current, i.e.,U 0.78d
For the above problem, if refraction is not considered,
H /Ho=Ks=0.9828,
Hence H=0.9828* Ho= 3.43m < Hoof 3.5m
(b) H at d=5m
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
17/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
17
Kr=8.0
1
8.0
1
8.6
6.15
9349.0*2
1
5.3
H=
H=3.5*1.24 = 4.34m > 0.78d (=3.9m) for d=5m
Problem 3
For a wave with T = 10 secs, Ho= 4m, evaluate the variation in the wave
height when the wave approaches shallow waters. Also determine the
depth of water in which the wave would break theoretically.
Solution
Ho = 4 m, T = 10 sec., Lo = 156 m. The variation of wave height as the wave
approaches shallow waters, is given in the table below. The method involves the
computation of d/Lovalues for progressive waves. With this information it is possible
to obtain the d/L values and the shoaling coefficient. The depth in which the wave
would break is computed from the Miche steepness equation i.e.,
.kdtanh142.0LH
The wave would break at d 5 m.
d(m) d/Lo d/L L H/Ho H H/L 0.142
tanh kd
70 0.45 0.4531 154.491 0.9847 3.938 0.02549 .1390
60 0.385 0.3907 153.57 .9728 3.891 .02534 .1379
50 .32 .3302 151.423 .9553 3.821 .02524 .1357
45 .288 .3014 149.303 .9449 3.779 .02531 .1338
35 .224 .2455 142.566 .9242 3.697 .02593 .127825 .160 .1917 130.412 .9130 3.652 .0280 .1169
15 .0964 .1380 108.696 .9358 3.743 .03444 .09786
6 .0386 .08175 73.395 1.072 4.228 .05842 .06608
4 .0257 .06613 60.487 1.159 4.636 .07664 .05504
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
18/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
18
Problem 4:
For a wave with period T= 10sec , deep water wave height H0= 3.5m and beach slope
m=1/15 calculate the breaking wave height using various formulae .
Solution
Sl.No Formulae for Breaking wave height Breaking
wave
height(Hb)
m
1 Le Mehaute and Koh(1967)
Hb=0.76*H0*(H0/L0)^(-0.25)*m^(1/7)
4.668
2 Komar and Gauhgen(1972)
Hb=0.56*H0*(H0/L0)^(-0.2)
4.189
3 Sumura and Horikowa(1974)
Hb=H0*m^0.2 *(H0/L0)^(-0.25)
5.262
4 Singamsetti and Wurd(1980)
Hb =0.575*H0*m^0.031*(H0/L0)^(-0.254)
4.854
5 Ogawa and Shuto(1984)
Hb=0.68*H0*m^0.09*(H0/L0)^(-0.25)
4.819
Problem 5:
Given T = 7 sec, Ho= 3m, Deep-water wave direction = 80o. Find Breaker height and
breaker depth using all formulae.
Solution:
Given tan= 6/500 = 0.012.Lo= 1.56T
2= 1.56(7
2) = 76.44m.
(a) Komar & Gaughen(1973):
( ) 5/1oL/oH
563.0
oH
bH =
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
19/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
19
( )m22.3
5/144.76/3
563.0x3bH ==
Breaker depth = bd78.0bH = Xb = 344m
(b)
LeMehaute & koh(1967):
( ) ( ) 4/1oL/oH.7/1tan76.0
oH
bH =
( ) 4/144.76/34/1)012.0(x3x76.0bH =
m74.2bH =
m6.290bx,m50.378.0/74.2bd ===
(c)
Sunamura(1983):
( ) ( ) 4/1oL/oH.5/1tan
oH
bH =
( ) ( ) 25.044.76/32.0012.0x3bH =
m297bx,m56.3bd;783.2bH ===
(d)
Munk(1949):
( ) 3/1oL/oH3.3/oHbH =
( ) 3/144.76/33.3
3oH =
m675.2bH =
m43.3bd =
bx = 286m
(e)
Godal(1975):
+= 3/4tan151oL/bd5.1exp1A
oL
bH
( ){ }[ ]0027.0*15144.76/bd712.4exp117.044.76
bH +=
0.7859=e-0.0592
b; for Hb= 2.782m
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
20/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
20
db= 4.0693m
(f) We have
[ ] ( ) 2/1ocos2/1gd2/oCoHbH =
[ ] ( ) 2/180cos2/16x81.92/7x56.1x3bH =
m054.1bH =
5/22/ocosoC
2oH5/4k5/1g
1bd
=
where m = beach slope
K = b(m) a (m) Hb/ gT2
a(m) = 43.80[1.0 e-19m
]
b(m) = 1.56[1.0+ e-19.5m]-1
m = tan and m = 0.012
a(m) = 43.80 [1.0 e-19x0.012
]
a(m) = 8.93, b(m) = 0.87 and k= 0.850
db= 1.70m
db= m Xb, where Xb= distance from the shore to breaker zone
Xb= 141.60m.
Problem 6:
Given wave height (H) = 1m, d=4m, wave period T = 8 sec,
Current velocity U = 1 m/ sec.
Calculate the amplitude and length of the waves when currents are in the same
direction & also in opposite direction. Also calculate the critical velocity at which
wave would tend to break.
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
21/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
21
Solution:
Wave amplitude and length when currents in the same direction
we have ( )
++= 2/1C/U4112/1
C
*C (1)
where C*= wave velocity in the presence of currents
U = current velocity
Lo= 1.56T2= 1.5x82= 99.84 m/sec, U = 1 m/sec
d/Lo= 0.0400, from wave tables d/L = 0.08329
L = 48.025 m
we have C = L/T = 48.025/8 = 6.00m/sec.
Substituting these values in equation (1)
We get C*= 6/2 [1+(1+4x1/6)1/2]
C*= 6.87 m/sec
further we have
( )[ ] 2/1*** 2// UCCCaa o +=
Co = Lo/ T = 12.48m/sec
a = H/2 = = 0.5m
by substituting the values of C*, Co, U we get the value of a
*
a*= 0.8 m.
*C
T
*L=
L*= 6.87 x 8
= 54.96m
when the waves travel in the same direction of current L*increases
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
22/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
22
(b) wave amplitude and length when currents in opposite direction:
we have C*/C = [1+ (1-4U/C)
1/2]
where U = -1 m/sec and C=6.00m/sec
we get C*= 4.732m/sec
then a*/ao= Co/ [C*(C*-2U)]1/2
a = 1.73 m.
L*= 2/K*but K*g/(C*)2
K*= 0.438 and L*= 2 x 3.14/0.81 = 14.38m
when the waves travel in opposite direction L*decreases.
At U = C/4 the waves would steepen and tends to break, then this will be the critical
velocity for breaking.
the critical velocity U = C/4 = 6/4 = 1.5m/s
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
23/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
23
APPENDIX "A"
Formulae for prediction of Breaker Depth/ height
The Majority of the existing formulas represent a relationship between the breaking wave
height (Hb) and the variables at the breaking or deepwater conditions, i.e., water depth atbreaking (hb), wavelength at breaking (Lb), bottom slope (m), deepwater wavelength (Lo), and
deepwater wave height (Ho). A brief review of the 20 breaker wave height formulas, that may
be used in general cases, are described as follows.
McCowan (1894),Hb= 0.78hb (1)
Miche (1944),
=
b
b
bbL
hLH 2
tanh142.0 (2)
Where Lbis the wavelength at the breaking point. Danel (1952)suggested changing the
coefficient from 0.142 to 0.12 when applying to the horizontal bottom.
Le Mehaute and Koh (1967)proposed an empirical formula based on three sources ofthe experimental data (Suquet, 1950; Iversen, 1952; and Hamada, 1963). The
experiments cover a range of 1/50 < m < 1/5 and 0.002 < Ho/ Lo< 0.093.
71m
41
oL
oHoH76.0bH
= (3)
Galvin (1969),performed laboratory experiments with regular wave on plane beach
combined his data with the data of Iversen (1952) and McCowan (1894). The breaking
criterion was developed by fitting empirical relationship between hb/Hband m.
07.085.640.1
1 = mform
hH bb (4.1)
07.092.0
>= mforh
H bb (4.2)
Collins and Weir (1969),derived a breaking height formula from linear wave theory and
empirically included the slope effect into the formula. The experimental data from three
sources (Suquet, 1950; Iversen, 1952; and Hamada, 1963)were used to fit the formula.
Hb= hb(0.72 + 5.6m) (5)
Goda (1970), analyzed several sets of laboratory data on breaking waves on slopesobtained by several researchers (Iversen, 1952; Mitsuyasu, 1962; and Goda, 1964)and
proposed a diagram presenting criterion for predicting breaking wave height. Then Goda(1974)gave an approximate expression for the diagram as
( )
+= 3/41515.1exp117.0 m
L
hLH
o
b
ob
(6)
Weggel (1972), proposed an empirical formula for computing breaking wave heightfrom five sources of laboratory data (Iversen, 1952; Galvin, 1969; Jen and Lin, 1970;
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
24/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
24
Weggel and Maxwell, 1970; and Reid and Bretschneider, 1953). The experiments
cover a range of 1/50 < m < 1/5.
( )[ ]( )[ ]mhgT
mThH
b
b
b19exp175.43
5.19exp1/56.12
2
+
+= (7)
Komar and Gaughan (1972),used linear wave theory to derive a breaker height formulafrom energy flux conservation and assumed a constant Hb/hb. After calibrating the
formula to the laboratory data of Iversen (1952), Galvin (1969), and unpublished data
of Komar and Simons (1968), and the field data of Munk (1949),the formula was
proposed to be
5/1
56.0
=
o
o
obL
HHH (8)
Sunamura and Horikawa (1974),used the same data set as Goda (1970) to plot the
relationship between Hb/Ho, Ho/Lo, and m. After fitting the curve the following formulawas proposed
25.0
2.0
=
o
o
obL
HmHH (9)
Madsen (1976),combined the formulas of Galvin (1969) and Collins (1970)to be( ) 10.04.6172.0
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
25/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
25
Singamsetti and Wind (1980),conducted a laboratory experiment and proposed twoempirical formulas based on their own data. The experiments cover a range of
1/401/5 and 0.02
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
26/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
26
1984; and Hansen and Svendsen, 1979). The experiments cover a range of 1/45
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
27/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
27
14.Singamsetti, S.R. and Sind, H.G. (1980). Characteristics of breaking and shoaling
periodic waves normally incident on to plane beaches of constant slope, Report M1371,
Delft Hydraulic Lab., Delft, The Netherlands.
15.Smith, J.M. and Kraus, N.C. (1990). Laboratory study on macro-features of wave
breaking over bars and artificial reefs, Technical Report CERC-90-12, WES, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers.
16.
Sunamura, T. (1980). A laboratory study of offshore transport of sediment and a modelfor eroding beaches, Proc. 17
thCoastal Eng. Con., ASCE: 1051-1070.
17.
Sunamura, T. and Horikawa, K. (1974).Two-dimensional beach transformation due to
waves, Proc. 14th
Coastal Eng. Conf., ASCE, pp. 920-938.
18.Weggel J.R. (1972).Maximum breaker height, J. Waterways, Harbors and Coastal Eng.
Div., Vol. 98, No. WW4: 529-548.
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
28/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
28
Fig.1 Refraction of waves approaching a straight coast
Fig.2 Refraction diagram, wave currents increase where wave orthogonals
converge, and decrease where orthogonals diverge
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
29/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
29
Fig.3 Wave refraction diagram for Paradeep Port for waves from the
south with period of 8 secs
Fig.4 Diffraction of wave energy
Fig.5 Diffraction of waves by an impermeable breakwater
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
30/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
30
Fig.6 Wave fronts and contour lines of maximum wave heights in the lee of a rigid breakwater, and waves
being incident normally. ( ____ ) exact solution. ( ------- ) approximate solution of Penny and Price (1952)
Fig.7 Variation of Kdwith distance parameter, r
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
31/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
31
Fig.8 Isolines of approximate diffraction
coefficients for normal wave incidence and a
breakwater of length ten tomes the wavelengths. (Penney and Price (1952))
Fig.9 Isolines of approximate diffraction
coefficients for normal wave incidence and a
breakwater gap width of 2.5 wave lengths.(Penney and Price (1952))
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
32/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
32
Fig.10 Wave height contours inside Madras harbour for incident wave of
T=10s, H=1m and =300with respect to North
Fig.11 Wave height contours inside Tangassery harbour for incident wave of T=8s, H=2m and
=450with respect to North
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
33/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
33
Fig.12a Wave height contours inside Visakhapatnam harbour(existing configuration as on 1994) for
incident wave of T=7s, H=1.2m and =900with respect to North
Fig.12b Wave height contours inside Visakhapatnam harbour ( Proposed configuration) for incident
wave of T=7s, H=1.2m and =900with respect to North
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
34/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India
34
Fig.13 Refraction of waves entering a current
-
8/10/2019 3.Wave Deformation.pdf
35/35
Wave Deformation
Prof.V.Sundar, Dept of Ocean Engg, IIT Madras, India