4 7 12 motion to alter or amend order affirming summary eviction 03628 entire eflex combined...

7/29/2019 4 7 12 Motion to Alter or Amend Order Affirming Summary Eviction 03628 ENTIRE EFLEX COMBINED APPENDIX 60

1/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Document Code:Zach Coughlin, Esq.Nevada Bar No: 9473! B!" #$9%&'eno, N( )9%$#

*ele: 77%+33)+))-a: 949+##7+74$&ZachCoughlin/hotmail.com0ttorne1 2or ro e 0ttorne1 0ellant

5N *6E EC!ND 8D5C50 D5*'5C* C!8'* !- *6E *0*E !- NE(0D0

5N 0ND -!' *6E C!8N* !- ;06!E

Z0C60' C!80**6E; >E'5

'esondent.

??

???????????

C0E N!: C(+$3#&)

DE*: D7

>otion to 0lter or 0mend !rder 022irming ummar1 Eviction !'der

C!>E N!;, art1 designated as reresented, @1 and through attorne1, Z0C60'

B0'AE' C!8emorandum o2 oints and 0uthorities su@mitted hereith and an1 oral argument this Court ma1

desire.

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY:

- 1


F I L E DElectronically

04-07-2012:12:25:43 AMJoey Orduna Hastings

Clerk of the Court

Transaction # 2875621


2/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

'ichard 6ill has lied continuousl1 throught this and the trial court roceeding. *here is a reason so man1 2ello

attorne1s quicl1 resond ith things lie e22 that mothere22erF the mention 6illGs name comes u. 6ill is @latant in his

2louting the la and the courts, itness his emails to me herein he @raHenl1 indicates he ill sirt the lien las o2 N'

)0. 4#$ and the las related to m1 @eing entitled to a hearing on such a lien ithin $ da1s Ithe 'C magicall1 doesnGt

have time 2or such a hearing 2or over si ees 2rom m1 2iling a >otion to Contest ersonal roert1 ien on J#J&,

desite N' 4$.&%3I7?+I)? requiring such a hearing @e held ithin $ da1s....and that Kust haens to coincide ith 6ill

announcing that he is going on vacation 2or si ees and ill not @e availa@le 2or a hearing until, 1ou guessed it, late

decem@er... 0lso, 5 get denied a continuance in ever1 '>C case against me, all these tra22ic violations incident to going

to 6illGs o22ice and @eing denied m1 state issued id, etc. and 6illGs criminal tresass case against me Iaarentl1 i2 6ill

signs a criminal comlaint and holds it in 2ront o2 a 'D !22icer, and arrest must @e made....?, 1et m1 alleged u@lic

de2ender e *aitel Iho should have never taen m1 case given 5 sued his @usiness artners, Nevada Court ervices,

grants a continuance, as signed o22 on @1 the '>C in the criminal tresass case @ecause 6ill had a # ee vacation to go

on in '>C Cr $%.

-rom: 'ichard 6ill Irhill/richardhilla.com?

ent: un J&$J &:4& >

*o: Hachcoughlin/hotmail.com

>r. Coughlin + 1ou continue to lie.

ou L 5 have soen several times.

ou call L rant at m1 secretar1 L then hang u @e2ore 5 can get on the line.

lease go @ac and re+read m1 emails to 1ou.

ou ill not @e alloed to cherr1+ic the roert1 L leave us ith several

thousand dollars orth o2 clean+u.

>a1 5 suggest that a good starting oint ould @e 2or 1ou to arrange a

dumster and thro all the cra in the @ac1ard into itMM

52 1ou ish to do that, as a starting oint, and to demonstrate 1our good

2aith, lease contact me and e ill get 1ou ritten authoriHation 2or that

urose. 8ntil 1u have that authoriHation, lease do not go to the

roert1.

- 2



3/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Nice touch on the 1ard sale signs.

5 thin that there are usea@le 2inger rints on the tae.

;eGll let 1ou no on that.

0s @e2ore, m1 o22er to get 1our allet L 2iles remains oen

'ghF

-rom: 'ichard 6ill Irhill/richardhilla.com?

ent: >on J&J &:$7 >

*o: Hachcoughlin/hotmail.com

Cc: cd@aer/richardhilla.com

the court is tr1ing to get ahold o2 1ou to hear 1our motion on the landlordGs lien tomorro.

i2 1ou donGt contact them, 1ou onGt get a hearing L 1our stu22 ill Kust sta1 here it is until late decem@er, @ecause our

schedule is @loced until then.

lease contact the court

3&%+#%$

rghF

5 ent to the hearing on J&&J. 6ill and Baer didnGt sho u. *hat should mean 5 in @1 de2ault, @ut

instead it meant 5 had to ait 3$ more da1s 2or a hearing, on &J&J. N' 4$.&%3I7?+I)? doesnGt sa1 5 get a hearing

ithin $ da1s unless 'ichard


4/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

lifelong ")ose$%to) n( ")ison )(en tht she is! she nte( to $on(%$t se)$h in$i(ent to ))est! &%t l$'e(

")o&&le $%se to (o so! othe) thn RMC M)shl H)le# n( Reno Cit# Atto)ne# O)*s his"e)ing o))ie(l#

in e$h othe),s e)s &o%t hethe) thei) *is$on(%$t $o%l( &e ")o-en! n( n#thing the# *# h-e si( to 0%(ge

Nsh Hol*es (%)ing the )e$ess he)e she )ef%se( to llo *e to t'e *# #ello legl "( to the )est)oo* ith *e!

ASTOUNDIN7LY. I * f)n'l# ""lle( 0%(ge Nsh Hol*es $on(%$t in ++ TR 89;;. The f$t tht the

s%**)# $onte*"t o)(e) 5she *(e *e s"en( < (#s in /il! in$%) =>;; fine fo) *# $) &eing toe(! t#"i$ll#

the /il stff lie( to *e n( o) )ef%se( *e *e(i$l $)e n( o) the &ilit# to file ""e)s o) tie) ti*e to *'e $lls to

-oi( ")e/%(i$e to $lients $ses..."l%s the RMC )i""e( *# *othe) off o%t of =+;;! t'ing he) *one#! &%t not

)elesing *e f)o* $%sto(# n# e)lie). 0%(ge Nsh Hol*es sei1e( n tto)ne#s s*)th"hones n( othe) "e)sonl

")o"e)t#! n( hs no h( it 'e"t in 3e-i(en$e4 fo) o-e) *onth! ith s%s"i$io%s! $ont)(i$to)# stte*ents *(e

the ?CSO! RMC! Reno M)shls! n( ?shoe Co%nt# Dist)i$t Atto)ne#,s offi$e $on$e)ning the $hin of

$%sto(# of s%$h *te)ils! hethe) tin# $o*"%te) (is$ $"&le of sto)ing li&))# f%ll of info)*tion s

)eleste( o) )etine( o) $o"ie( o) ht in the o)l( s (one ith it! et$.! et$. F%)the)! the ?CSO $on(%$te(

nothe) one of its h&it%l illegl e-i$tions! see'ing to $i)$%*-ent the (i$ttes of n)$" 95e6 hen 3"e)sonll#

se)-e(4 $nnot &e (one 5tho%gh! t#"i$ll# the ?CSO /%st )ei*gines ht 3"e)sonll# se)-e(4 *ens in s%$h

instn$es! n##s! &%t....6. See Exhi&it +! n(:

htt:[email protected]$-;6-NE

htt:[email protected]@+


5/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

I h-e h( -e)# (iffi$%lt ti*e sin$e A%g%st. M# gi)lf)ien( of < #e)s n( I &)o'e )o%n( 0%ne 8;++! (#s fte)

she finll# g)(%te( f)o* UNR ith /o%)nlis* (eg)ee fte) #e)s off s$)ifi$e on &oth of o%) ")ts to see tht

h""en. She too' to *onths o)th of )ent f)o* *e! &%t file( to fo))( it on to o%) ln(lo)( 5s s o%)

")$ti$e6 itho%t telling *e. No&o(# hs $h)ge( he) ith l)$en#. Then! in A%g%st I s ))este( in$i(ent to

sit%tion he)e *n fo%n( $ell "hone on the g)o%n( t s'te ")' in (onton Reno! hel( it loft! n(

nno%n$e( tht if so*eone (i( not $li* it )ight # he o%l( Jth)o it in the )i-e)J.

htt":@@.#o%t%&e.$o*@t$h-


6/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

htt":@@.#o%t%&e.$o*@t$h-g2%B1fl7ALE

Tht /#l' ))est s on +@+8@+8. To (#s lte)! I s ))este( n( $h)ge( ith the g)oss *is(e*eno) of

J*is%se of B++J the s*e RPD S)gent P%l Sif)e 5ho isn,t &( g%#! the #! he /%st sings fo) the

fen$es! hits lots of ho*e)s! &%t st)i'es o%t &it too...."e)sonll#! I "l# the "e)$entges! "ottoe! "oe th toe....6! on

+@+@+8! hen I )et%)ne( ho*e to )oo* I s )enting to fin( *# (og s *issing n( *# )oo**tes )es"on(ing

to *# %e)ies ith *en$e n( inn%en(o:

htt":@@.#o%t%&e.$o*@t$h-oU>t'RR;RA

Lstl#! on 8@8G@+8! I s o)(e)e( /ile( fo) < (#s RMC 0%(ge Nsh Hol*es! ho lso o)(e)e( &oth of *# $ell

"hones 5one &eing s*)t "hone6! n( othe) "e)sonl ")o"e)t# &oo'e( into Je-i(en$eJ he)e%"on s%$h ")o"e)t#

s sei1e( n( ithhel( f)o* *e fo) o-e) >; (#s! itho%t n#thing in the # of n ex"lntion fo) h# s%$h n

"")o$h s t'en. The S%**)# Conte*"t O)(e) 0%(ge Nsh Hol*es o$$%))e( in$i(ent to *# $)ossK

ex*ining RPD S)gent T)te) &o%t n in$i(ent on ++@+


7/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stte 2) of Ne-( n(! %lti*tel#! the Ne-( S%")e*e Co%)t! is *%$h of /o'ing *tte). Reg)(less! the

$i)$%*stn$es s%))o%n(ing the ))est n( those hi$h o$$%))e( s%&se%entl# o%l( onl# le( $)e(en$e to

"osition tht t'es se)io%sl# tht stte*ent Offi$e) C)te). Si*"l# "%t! hen Ri$h)( Hill *'es n(

llegtion! the RPD t)ets it s se)io%s $)i*inl *tte) n( th)os the f%ll eight of the "oli$e fo)$e &ehin( it.

Hoe-e)! hen so*eone li'e *#self lleges $)i*inl -ioltion 5s%$h s the (o*esti$ -iolen$e $o**itte( ginst

*e *# ho%se*tes! s (/%(ge( in F+8K;;+ n( F+8K;;+G o) he)e Hill %nlf%ll# ithhol(s *# ()i-e)s

li$ense fo) G (#s f)o* *e! o) *# $lient,s files fo) 9 ee's "%)s%nt to n %nlf%l )ent (ist)int s o%tle(

NRS ++A.otion to 0lter or 0mend !rder 022irming ummar1 Eviction !'der


8/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

)(ing tto)ne#s fees in ll "")o")ite sit%tions. It is the intent of the Legislt%)e tht the $o%)t )(

tto)ne#s fees "%)s%nt to this ")g)"h n( i*"ose sn$tions "%)s%nt to R%le ++ of the Ne-( R%les of Ci-il

P)o$e(%)e in ll "")o")ite sit%tions to "%nish fo) n( (ete) f)i-olo%s o) -extio%s $li*s n( (efenses &e$%se

s%$h $li*s n( (efenses o-e)&%)(en li*ite( /%(i$il )eso%)$es! hin(e) the ti*el# )esol%tion of *e)ito)io%s $li*s

n( in$)ese the $osts of engging in &%siness n( ")o-i(ing ")ofessionl se)-i$es to the "%&li$.J

n( he)e Co%)ts *# &e stifling the "%&li$,s &ilit# to litigte on thei) on &ehlf the ""li$tion of

s%**)# $onte*"t o)(e)s 5ie! fo) J"%)s%ing lines of in%i)# fte) &eing tol( not toJ o) he)e Jne$ess)# to

*intin the (ignit# of the $o%)tJ6 iss%e( "%)s%nt to NRS 88.;+;586: JA &)e$h of the "e$e! &oiste)o%s $on(%$t

o) -iolent (ist%)&n$e in the ")esen$e of the $o%)t! o) in its i**e(ite -i$init#! ten(ing to inte))%"t the (%e $o%)se

of the t)il o) othe) /%(i$il ")o$ee(ing.J

n(:

NRS 88.;>; S%**)# "%nish*ent of $onte*"t $o**itte( in i**e(ite -ie n( ")esen$e of $o%)t ffi(-it o)

stte*ent to &e file( hen $onte*"t $o**itte( o%tsi(e i**e(ite -ie n( ")esen$e of $o%)t (is%lifi$tion of

/%(ge.

+. If $onte*"t is $o**itte( in the i**e(ite -ie n( ")esen$e of the $o%)t o) /%(ge t $h*&e)s! the

$onte*"t *# &e "%nishe( s%**)il#. If the $o%)t o) /%(ge s%**)il# "%nishes "e)son fo) $onte*"t "%)s%nt

to this s%&se$tion! the $o%)t o) /%(ge shll ente) n o)(e) tht:

56 Re$ites the f$ts $onstit%ting the $onte*"t in the i**e(ite -ie n( ")esen$e of the $o%)t o) /%(ge

5&6 Fin(s the "e)son g%ilt# of the $onte*"t n(

5$6 P)es$)i&es the "%nish*ent fo) the $onte*"t.

8. If $onte*"t is not $o**itte( in the i**e(ite -ie n( ")esen$e of the $o%)t o) /%(ge t $h*&e)s! n

ffi(-it *%st &e ")esente( to the $o%)t o) /%(ge of the f$ts $onstit%ting the $onte*"t! o) stte*ent of the f$ts

the *ste)s o) )&it)to)s.

>. Ex$e"t s othe)ise ")o-i(e( in this s%&se$tion! if $onte*"t is not $o**itte( in the i**e(ite -ie n(

")esen$e of the $o%)t! the /%(ge of the $o%)t in hose $onte*"t the "e)son is llege( to &e shll not ")esi(e t the

t)il of the $onte*"t o-e) the o&/e$tion of the "e)son. The ")o-isions of this s%&se$tion (o not ""l# in:

- 8



9/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

56 An# $se he)e finl /%(g*ent o) (e$)ee of the $o%)t is ()n in %estion n( s%$h /%(g*ent o) (e$)ee

s ente)e( in s%$h $o%)t ")e(e$esso) /%(ge the)eof +; #e)s o) *o)e ")e$e(ing the &)inging of $onte*"t

")o$ee(ings fo) the -ioltion of the /%(g*ent o) (e$)ee.

5&6 An# ")o$ee(ing (es$)i&e( in s%&se$tion + of NRS >.88>! hethe) o) not f*il# $o%)t hs &een est&lishe(

in the /%(i$il (ist)i$t.

?h# (oes 0%(ge Nsh Hol*es J"ologi1e fo) t'ing to (#s to get this "$'ge to #o%J hen she )ites

2) Co%nsel Pt)i$' ing Is ing soli$iting *te)ils f)o* 0%(ges Is it little %nto)( tht 2) Co%nsel

Pt)i$' O! ing )ef%ses to nse) hethe) o) not! ll of the s%((en! 0%(ge 7)(ne) fo))(e( on $o"# of M#

8;;B Sn$tions O)(e) in (i-o)$e $se 5fo) hi$h I file( Mn(*%s $tion o""osing s%$h sn$tions 5n( I h-e

no ")o&le* ith 0%(ge 7)(ne)! /%st li'e Dennis ?i((es! Es.! hs no ")o&le* ith n( $t%ll#! "")entl#! hs

g)et o)'ing )eltionshi" ith 0%(ge 2e))# (es"ite ?i((es - Se$on( 0%(i$il Dist)i$t Co%)t &eing in thei)

"st6. The *n(*%s "etition I file( in$i(ent to 0%(ge 7)(ne),s sn$tion o)(e):

htt":@@$seinfo.n-s%")e*e$o%)t.%s@"%&li$@$seie.(o$sIID88G9

2) Co%nsel Pt)i$' O. ing no tte*"ts to o"en $se n%*&e) solel# )elte( to 0%(ge 7)(ne) th)ee #e) ol(

Sn$tion o)(e)! #et he on,t tell *e hethe) 0%(ge 7)(ne) file( it o) so*e&o(# else! o) e-en let *e loo' t

(o$%*enttion "%)"o)ting to &e $$%stions ginst *e. Most t)o%&ling is the f$t tht Pt)i$' O. ing n(

Ri$h)( 7. Hill n( Cse# 2'e)! Es. ?e)e ll o)'ing on the s*e $se! Ne-.!8;+8. C)st)"hen -. Milsne)! 8G;

P.>( +8


10/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

I (on,t )ell# en/o# (i-%lging the info)*tion fo%n( in Exhi&it +. I (o it fo) the *e*o)# of the Hono)&le

Ro&e)t Pe))# n( those li'e hi*. I (i( to to $onf)ont /$'sses li'e Ri$h)( 7. Hill n( Cse# 2'e) n( thei)

"hone# 3$)$' "i"e n( &g of ee(4 nonsense....n( De")t*ent G 'nos &o%t thei) )i(i$%lo%s $ont)$to) Phil

Ste)t &eing (est)o#e( on $)oss ex*intion t the he)ing on Hill,s Motion fo) O)(e) to Sho C%se 5 the

#! ho (oes tht (ese)-e n $t%l $o%)t he)ing 5one t'ing "l$e o-e) to (#s! no less6! &%t *# ""el! fo)

hi$h I "l%n'e( (on the lst of *# h)( e)ne( $se! n( fo) hi$h the An-%i $se s#s shll &e )e-iee( on (e

no-o &sis...ho (oes *# ""el not get $o%)t (te &%t Hill, t)i"e Motion fo) O)(e) to Sho C%se (oes6. One

*ight s' the s*e &o%t ho *# g)ie-n$e )elte( to &eing llege(l# sh'en (on Ch)$te) n( Fitness

Co**ittee *e*&e) ho ons *onolithi$ Ls egs st)i" $l%& n( ho f%nnele( *e to n tto)ne# ho s

-e)# $lose f)ien( of his! n( on to "s#$hologist s lso! es"e$ill# he)e tht tto)ne# then lie( t the he)ing

&o%t (oing the $se 3")o &ono4 5hi$h the st)i" $l%& oning Ch)$te) n( Fitness Co**ittee *e*&e) hs

")o*ise( to ")o-i(e *e ith > n*es of tto)ne#s ho o%l( hn(le *e $se 3")o &ono46....ho (oes tht not get

e-en n# in-estigtion M). ing! &%t M). ing "")entl# is $lling %" ll the /%(ges in the (i)e$to)# soli$iting

the* fo) t)sh tl' &o%t *e Ho (oes tht )efle$t on the &) Ri$h)( Hill,s g)ie-n$e lleges so*e "%)"o)te(

3ghost)iting4 Motion to Sho C%se )eg)(ing sn$tion fte) the filign of &n')%"t$# is "e) se ")oof tht I

* (nge) to the "%&li$ ith l li$ense ?ht (oes Hill s# of his n( his sso$ite 2'e) t)#ing to $on-e)t

=8!>;; of *# *one# to thei) $lient $)eti-el# 3)e*ixing4 0%(ge Sfe))11,s O)(e) of +;@8G@++! n( ho"ign

no&o(# o%l( noti$e O) of thei) l#ing to the RPD &o%t ex")essl#! in )iting! in(i$ting to *e the# o%l( &e

$h)ging *e the s*e )ent! =B;;! fo) 3sto)ge4 s s ")e-io%sl# $h)ge( fo) 3f%ll %se n( o$$%"n$#4. I get it.

These g%#s *'e lot of *one#. ?e h-e s#ste* of ele$ting /%(ges. 2%t these )e the (#s of t)ns")en$#!

n( the f%l$)%* of $o*"etition n( )ti$les li'e those in the LA ti*es in 8;;9 *# %ge) to)(s "%tting Ri$h)(

on ti*e o%t! n( *'ign Cse# 2'e) )ite! +;; ti*es! on &l$' &o)( 3I ill not *o-e fo) =8; in tto)ne#s

fees in /%sti$e $o%)t e-i$tion *tte) s%""ose(l# 3$$i(entl#4 $iting to so*e NRS tht )eltes to onl# those

sit%tions he)e *eth l&s )e &eing )%n o%t of ")t*ents! he)e no s%$h llegtion s *(e 5tho%gh! gi-e these

g%#s ti*e! n( I o%l(n,t (o%&t the 3$)$' "i"e n( &g of ee(4 n))ti-e *# t%)n into 3inte)ntionl )*s

s*%ggle) $o*&ine( ith h%*n t)ffi$'ing n( en)i$he( %)ni%* )ing4 the# fo%n( t *# fo)*e) ho*e l

offi$e fntsi. Also! I h-e (one &it of o)' fo) 7eof 7iles! Es. Re$entl#. He is not )es"onsi&le fo) n# of *#

()*! (oesn,t $osign n# &s o%t of *e! et$.! et$. Hoe-e)! 7iles s%e( Pt)i$' ing on$e he)e ing s the

- 10



11/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

*e(ito) in fo)e$los%)e *e(ition $ontext n( "")entl# is s )the) $)i*onio%s. Hill sho%l( not &e &le to

le-e)ge the RPD! R0C! ?DC! ?CSO! 2) Co%nsel! 7)een A$tion Ln Se)-i$e! et$.! et$. /%st &e$%se he is too

l1# to loo' %" ")e$e(ent in s%""o)t of his )g%*ents n( &e$%se the# f$ts of his $se )e so e'. An(! I 'no

0%(ge Nsh Hol*es hs long n( (isting%ishe( $)ee). I h-e )es"e$t fo) 0%(ge Nsh Hol*es. I (o thin' the

Cit# of Reno M)shl,s Di-ision nee(s to sto" $ting li'e the# )e in f)te)nit# ho%se n( *o)e li'e the# )e in

$o%)t of l! tho%gh! n( tht *ost /%(ges ho o)' (# in n( (# o%t ith those M)shls o%l( &e ise to t'e

%" fo) the* hen (is"%te )ises! to n extent....hoe-e)! those s*e M)shls *# ell ()g so*e 0%(ges into

sit%tions he)e the 2en$h o%l( &e &ette) off not going! n( if M)shl o) Reno Cit# Atto)ne# is f)i( tht

so*e *is$on(%$t on thei) ")t *# $o*e to light! tht is thei) ")o&le*! not the 2en$h,s! n( *#&e the Cit#

Atto)ne# n( RMC M)shls sho%l( &e g)tef%l the# h-e s%$h goo( "#ing /o&s! n( %it hssling! inti*i(ting!

n( *li$io%sl# ")ose$%ting *e*&e)s of the "%&li$ ")ti$%l)l# those the the legl $%*en to "oint o%t thei)

t)nsg)essions.

II. AR7UMENT:

N'C %9Ia? and N'C %9Ie?

*he ;C!Gs o22ice 2inall1 allegedl1 returned m1 ersonal roert1 that udge Nash 6olmes

seiHed 2rom me ithout elanation, during an aarentl1 retetual arrest 2or summar1 contemt

Iretetual in the sense that Kust minutes @e2ore she sua sonte started cross eamining a@out hether

5 had an1 recordings devicesF minutes a2ter '>C >arshal 6arle1 and 'eno Cit1 0ttorne1 !rmaas

ere seen hisering in each otherGs ears orriedl1 hen the toic o2 hether 5 could rove the

@ull1ing, intimidating @ehavior o2 6arle1 and the @lasP re2usal o2 !rmaas to 2ollo u on the @ri@er1

allegations vis a vis 'D !22icer C. Carter, and argent *arter @1 'ichard 6ill and the retaliator1

intent evident thereto in connecdtion ith the tra22ic citation sin tr )$$. No 5 ic u the

hones and micro sd card toda1, and hat do 1ou no, the micro sd card is non2unctional and all

the data on it is no longer accesi@le. ;hat a coincidence.

0n1a1s, m1 *enantGs 0nser right in the 2irst 2e ages led that 5 as a commercial

tenant. >erlissGs notice as not 2or non a1ment o2 rent, it as no cause. 5e, a clear mistae o2 la

- 11



12/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

is evident here, as N' 4$.&%3 2or@ids summar1 eviction against commercial tenants, eriod.

-urther, it seems odd that an entire hearing is devoted to 6illGs ridiculous >otion 2or !rder to ho

Cause Isread out over to da1s? 1et, 5 do not even get a hearing 2or this aeal 2or hich 5 aid the

2iling 2ee. -urther, 0nvui requires that an aeal o2 a summar1 eviction order @e heard on a de novo

@asis, hich, clearl1 as not alied in this aeal, articularl1 here no hearing as held. -urther,

udge 2erraHHaGs order is clearl1 erroneous here it urorts to hold that no evidence o2 retaliation

or inha@ilit1 as ut onF in the trial court. *he 3$ ages o2 emails sa1 otherise. *he man1 ictures

o2 mold1 insulation and the mincing, contradictor1 anser @1 Dr. >erliss, sa1 otherise.

eah, this motion loos hahaHard. 5Gd love to see hat 'ichard 6ill 2iles ithout having his

dadGs motionsJoositions to co1 and aste and hile having '>C udges seiHe his smart hone 2or

37 da1s, having the 'C re2use to 2ile motions and other 2ilings Ilie a motion to sta1 the eviction o2

3J%J& that is shon occuring at gunoint on 1outu@e, etc., etc?, having attorne1Gs lie 6ill and

Baer access their harddrives during the # ees the1 al1 an imermissi@le rent distraint to client

2iles o2 an oosing attorne1, etc., etc.

Zach Coughlin, lainti22, su@mits this motion on his on @ehal2. *he undersigned does not on an o22ice

@uilding that he rents out to la1ers or a la 2irm. 8ndersigned does not have a Q7%,$$$ 1ear salar1 ith car and

hone alloance and health @ene2its. *he undersigned asnGt aid over Q%$,$$$ to litigate this eviction matter @1 a

headstrong Cali2ornia neurosurgeon ho maes Q%$$,$$$ er 1ear. 0ctuall1, '>C udge Nash 6olmes recentl1 rote

tate Bar o2 Nevada Bar Counsel atric Aing to alleged some unattri@uted hearsa1 suggesting that the udnersigned as

living in his car. *his, here '>C udge 6oard denied an 5- as ell. 6oever, 'ichard BE' 5N

!5CE 'E!'* 0ND 5N E"65B5* !N -5ED 5N 'C 'E( &$+$$7$). 0ll those ta returns, ro2its loss

statements, 2inancial lanner audits, and 5! rosecti ma1 @e di22icult to access given all he di22erent evictions, custodial

arrests, seiHures o2 cell hones @1 udge Nash 6olmes, destro1ing o2 his dog @1 the 'D, etc. that the undersigned has

2aced latel1. Being a licensed Nevada attorne1 isnGt an automatic turn on the 2aucet mone1 ours outF roosition.

- 12



13/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-urther, the Chie2 udge ma1 have ruled on matters @e1ond the Kursidiction accorded to rule on one 5- alication,

maing an order that seas to 0N -8*8'E alication.

*his >otion is made ursuant to the authorities discussed @elo, including N'C %9Ie? and

N'C %&, and DC'3I7? and ;DC' &I)? and is suorted @1 the attached >emorandum o2 oints

and 0uthorities, the Declaration o2 Zachar1 B. Coughlin, Esq., the aers and leadings on 2ile

herein, and an1 oral argument this court ma1 allo, as it is @eing requested.

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

*his 2ilign is @eign 2iled 3 da1s earl1 ith an intent to sulement it given the con2iusion over

hether ;DC Deartments grant litigates 3 additional da1 sunder N'C #Ie? here 2iligns are

elctdronicall1 2iled and sered.

&. $%. 0ctions involving indigent ersons . 0n1 erson ho desires to rosecute or de2end a civil

action ma1: Ia? -ile an a22idavit ith the court setting 2orth ith articularit1 2acts concerning the

ersonRs income, roert1 and other resources hich esta@lish that the erson is una@le to rosecute

or de2end the action @ecause the erson is una@le to a1 the costs o2 so doing= or I@? u@mit a

statement or otherise indicate to the court that the erson is a client o2 a rogram 2or legal aid. &. 52

the court is satis2ied that a erson ho 2iles an a22idavit ursuant to su@section is una@le to a1 the

costs o2 rosecuting or de2ending the action or i2 the court 2inds that a erson is a client o2 a rogram

2or legal aid, the court shall order: Ia? *he cler o2 the court: I? *o allo the erson to commence or

de2end the action ithout costs= and I&? *o 2ile or issue an1 necessar1 rit, rocess, leading or aer

ithout charge. I@? *he sheri22 or other aroriate u@lic o22icer ithin this tate to mae ersonal

service o2 an1 necessar1 rit, rocess, leading or aer ithout charge. 3. 52 the erson is required

to have roceedings reorted or recorded, or i2 the court determines that the reorting, recording or

- 13



14/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

transcrition o2 roceedings ould @e hel2ul to the adKudication or aellate revie o2 the case, the

court shall order that the reorting, recording or transcrition @e er2ormed at the eense o2 the

count1 in hich the action is ending @ut at a reduced rate as set @1 the count1. 4. 52 the erson

revails in the action, the court shall enter its order requiring the losing art1 to a1 into court ithin

% da1s the costs hich ould have @een incurred @1 the revailing art1, and those costs must then

@e aid as rovided @1 la. %. ;here the a22idavit esta@lishes that the erson is una@le to de2end an

action, the running o2 the time ithin hich to aear and anser or otherise de2end is tolled

during the eriod @eteen the 2iling o2 the a22idavit and the ruling o2 the court thereon. #. 0n

a22idavit 2iled ursuant to this section, and an1 alication or request 2or an order 2iled ith the

a22idavit, does not constitute a general aearance @e2ore the court @1 the a22iant or give the court

ersonal Kurisdiction over the a22iant. 7. *he order o2 the court to hich alication is made ursuant

to this section is not aeala@le. ). 0s used in this section, client o2 a rogram 2or legal aidF means a

erson: Ia? ;ho is reresented @1 an attorne1 ho is emlo1ed @1 or volunteering 2or a rogram 2or

legal aid organiHed under the ausices o2 the tate Bar o2 Nevada, a count1 or local @ar association, a

count1 or municial rogram 2or legal services or other rogram 2unded @1 this tate or the 8nited

tates to rovide legal assistance to indigent ersons= and I@? ;hose eligi@ilit1 2or such

reresentation is @ased uon indigenc1. C'ED5*I? 0dded @1 as 9#7, . &$9. 0mended @1

as 9)9, . &$= as 99, . 4%%= as &$$%, c. #9, S , e22. !ct. , &$$%. 65*!'5C0 0ND

*0*8*!' N!*E &$$% egislation as &$$%, c. #9, S , rerote the section hich reviousl1

read: . 0n1 erson ho desires to rosecute or de2end a civil action ma1 2ile an a22idavit ith the

court setting 2orth ith articularit1 2acts concerning his income, roert1 and other resources hich

esta@lish that he is una@le to rosecute or de2end the action @ecause he is una@le to a1 the costs o2 so

doing. 52 the Kudge is satis2ied that the erson is una@le to a1 the costs, he shall order: Ia? *he cler

- 14



15/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

o2 the court: I? *o allo the erson to commence or de2end the action ithout costs= and I&? *o

2ile or issue an1 necessar1 rit, rocess, leading or aer ithout charge. I@? *he sheri22 or other

aroriate u@lic o22icer ithin this tate to mae ersonal service o2 an1 necessar1 rit, rocess,

leading or aer ithout charge. &. 52 the erson is required to have roceedings reorted or

recorded, or i2 the court determines that the reorting, recording or transcrition o2 roceedings

ould @e hel2ul to the adKudication or aellate revie o2 the case, the court shall order that the

reorting, recording or transcrition @e er2ormed at the eense o2 the count1 in hich the action is

ending @ut at a reduced rate as set @1 the count1. 3. 52 the erson revails in the action, the court

shall enter its order requiring the losing art1 to a1 into court ithin % da1s the costs hich ould

have @een incurred @1 the revailing art1, and those costs must then @e aid as rovided @1 la. 4.

;here the a22idavit esta@lishes that the erson is una@le to de2end an action, the running o2 the time

ithin hich to aear and anser or otherise de2end is tolled during the eriod @eteen the 2iling

o2 the a22idavit and the ruling o2 the court thereon. %. 0n a22idavit 2iled ursuant to this section, and

an1 alication or request 2or an order 2iled ith the a22idavit, does not constitute a general

aearance @e2ore the court @1 the a22iant or give the court ersonal Kurisdiction over him. #. *he

order o2 the court to hich alication is made ursuant to this section is not [email protected] &$$9

egislation *echnical corrections ere made to con2orm ith egislative Counsel Bureau revisions

I&$$9?. C'! 'E-E'ENCE District courts, 2ees 2or o22icial reorter, see N' 3.34$. usticesG

courts, aiver o2 costs and o22icial 2ees 2or indigent litigants, see N' #%.$4$. *erminating arental

rights, aointment o2 attorne1 2or indigent arents, see N' &).$$. 5B'0' 'E-E'ENCE

Costs &7. ;estla Ae1 Num@er earch: $&&7. C... Costs SS )7, 93. 'EE0'C6

'E-E'ENCE 0' i@rar1 9) 0' &)4, Constitutionalit1 o2 tatutes roviding 2or 'e2und o2

*aes 5llegall1 or Erroneousl1 Eacted. N!*E !- DEC55!N 5n general & 022idavit 3 Burden o2

- 15



16/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

roo2 % Due rocess J& -actors to @e considered # -rivolous claims ) >andamus 4 (alidit1

;aiver o2 securit1 2or costs 7 J&. Due rocess 5n determining hether an indigent art1 in a

contemt roceeding @ased on nona1ment o2 child suort has a due rocess right to aointment o2

counsel, a2ter @alancing each o2 the due rocess elements against the other, the1 as a hole are

measured against the resumtion that a right to aointed counsel arises onl1 hen the indigent

art1 ma1 lose his ersonal 2reedom. 'odrigueH v. Eighth udicial Dist. Court e rel. Count1 o2

Clar, &$$4, $& .3d 4, &$ Nev. 79), certiorari denied &% .Ct. &9$%, %4% 8.. #, #&

.Ed.&d &9). Constitutional a 4494 . (alidit1 (eatious+litigant restrictive order against roer+

erson civil litigant, ordering that litigant ould not @e alloed to roceed as roer erson litigant

ith aiver o2 2ees in an1 ne actions and ould @e required to o@tain leave o2 court @e2ore 2iling

an1 ne action, as unconstitutionall1 over@road, given that order 2ailed to set an1 standard against

hich a 2uture court+access determination ould @e made= order contained aarent @lanet

rohi@ition on 2iling o2 an1 ne actions in 2orma aueris, desite litigantGs indigence and regardless

o2 hether the 2uture action involved a 2undamental right. ordan v. tate e rel. Det. o2 >otor

(ehicles and u@lic a2et1, &$$%, $ .3d 3$, & Nev. 44, rehearing denied. 5nKunction )9 B1

conditioning aiver o2 2iling 2ee on indigents a@ilit1 to o@tain certi2icates o2 attorne1s that indigentsG

causes o2 actions or de2enses had merit, statute violated equal rotection guarantees contained in

tate and -ederal Constitution= statute could oerate to reclude 2iling o2 meritorious actions @1

indigent ersons as ell as 2rivolous actions. 8..C.0. Const.0mend. 4= N.'.. &. $%= Const. 0rt.

4, S &. Barnes v. Eighth udicial Dist. Court o2 tate o2 Nev., 5n and -or Clar Count1, 9)7, 74)

.&d 4)3, $3 Nev. #79. Constitutional a 3&&)= Costs &9 Comlaints hich risoners attemted

to 2ile in district court asserted causes o2 action 2or malractice against their attorne1s in connection

ith their criminal roceedings, and thus comlaints did not imlicate an1 2undamental right

- 16



17/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

recogniHed @1 -ederal Constitution, and inasmuch as comlaints did not imlicate 2undamental right,

rovision o2 statute requiring su@mission o2 a22idavit o2 attorne1 to suort motion to roceed in

2orma aueris ould @e held constitutional i2 classi2ication scheme created @1 statute as rationall1

related to 2urthering legitimate state interest. N.'.. &.$%. Barnes v. Eighth udicial Dist. Court o2

tate o2 Nev., 5n and -or Clar Count1, 9)7, 74) .&d 4)3, $3 Nev. #79. Costs 3&I#? ;rit o2

mandamus ould issue to comel district court to 2ile comlaints and motions to roceed in 2orma

aueris and to re2rain 2rom en2orcing statute conditioning aiver o2 2iling 2ees on indigentsG a@ilit1

to o@tain certi2icates o2 attorne1s that indigentsG claims had merit= statute violated equal rotection

guarantees contained in tate and -ederal Constitutions. 8..C.0. Const.0mend. 4= N.'.. &. $%=

Const. 0rt. 4, S &. Barnes v. Eighth udicial Dist. Court o2 tate o2 Nev., 5n and -or Clar Count1,

9)7, 74) .&d 4)3, $3 Nev. #79. Constitutional a 3&&)= Costs $#= >andamus 3 &. 5n general

8on receiving a roer+erson civil comlaint and an alication to roceed in 2orma aueris, the

district court must 2irst consider the alicationGs merits and determine hether the accoman1ing

a22idavit and an1 additional investigation demonstrate that the alicant is una@le to a1 the costs o2

roceeding ith the action, and i2 the court so 2inds, the court must grant the alicant leave to

roceed ithout the a1ment o2 costs, and 2ile the comlaint. ordan v. tate e rel. Det. o2 >otor

(ehicles and u@lic a2et1, &$$%, $ .3d 3$, & Nev. 44, rehearing denied. Costs &)

0ointment o2 attorne1 to reresent auer is rovided @1 statute onl1 2or trial level o2 litigation,

not 2or aeals. N.'.. &.$%,

su@d. Ia? I&?. Caser v. 6u@er, 9#9, 4%# .&d 43#, )% Nev. 474, certiorari denied 9$ .Ct. &4&,

397 8.. $&, &% .Ed.&d 4&%. 0eal 0nd Error 3)9I? 3. 022idavit Cler o2 district court as

required to 2ile alication 2or leave to roceed in 2orma aueris that as in roer 2orm and as

sorn to under enalt1 o2 erKur1, even though document as entitled alicationF rather than

- 17



18/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

a22idavit,F as set 2orth in statute. N.'.. &.$%, su@d. . ullivan v. Eighth udicial Dist. Court 5n

and -or Count1 o2 Clar, 99%, 9$4 .&d $39, Nev. 3#7. Clers !2 Courts #7 4. >andamus

0ctions o2 chie2 Kudge o2 district court in re2using to allo 2iling o2 risonersG leadings ere not

aeala@le determinations, and gravamen o2 etitions 2or rits o2 mandamus as that chie2 Kudge

acted ar@itraril1 and cariciousl1 in re2using to allo 2iling o2 leading, so that risoners ere

ithout lain, seed1 and adequate remed1 in ordinar1 course o2 la to challenge re2usal to 2ile their

leadings, and chie2 KudgeGs actions ould escae revie i2 etitions ere not entertained @1 courts,

so that ureme Court ould eercise its discretion and consider etitions 2or mandamus on merits.

'ules 0.roc., 'ule 30I@?= N.'.. &.$%, su@d. 4. Barnes v. Eighth udicial Dist. Court o2 tate

o2 Nev., 5n and -or Clar Count1, 9)7, 74) .&d 4)3, $3 Nev. #79. >andamus 3I3?= >andamus 3

%. Burden o2 roo2 (eatious+litigant restrictive order against roer+erson civil litigant satis2ied

requirement o2 containing su@stantive 2indings as to 2rivolous or harassing nature o2 litigantGs actions,

though district court could have made additional su@stantive 2indings, here district court seci2icall1

2ound that litigant 2iled numerous unmeritorious and contradictor1 documents and documents in

hich he merel1 reasserted allegations under changed cations, record demonstrated that litigant

reeatedl1 su@mitted meritless legall1 imroer and contradictor1 2ilings, and litigantGs reeated

attacs on oosing counsel and district Kudge demonstrated attern o2 intent to harass de2endants and

the court. ordan v. tate e rel. Det. o2 >otor (ehicles and u@lic a2et1, &$$%, $ .3d 3$, &

Nev. 44, rehearing denied. 5nKunction &$4 (eatious+litigant restrictive order against roer+erson

civil litigant, ordering that litigant ould not @e alloed to roceed as roer erson litigant ith

aiver o2 2ees in an1 ne actions and ould @e required to o@tain leave o2 court @e2ore 2iling an1

ne action, as imroer, here it did not contain su@stantive 2indings as to 2rivolous or harassing

nature o2 litigantGs actions, though record indicated that man1 o2 litigantGs 2ilings ere di22icult to

- 18



19/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

understand and o2ten rocedurall1 imroer= litigantGs allegations in current action against tate

relating to his arrest ere not ithout argua@le merit, and a reliminar1 evidentiar1 hearing, a2ter

litigant had @een granted in 2orma aueris status and comlaint had @een 2iled @ut @e2ore issuance o2

summonses, could have heled revent con2usion regarding the 2ilings. ordan v. tate e rel. Det.

o2 >otor (ehicles and u@lic a2et1, &$$%, $ .3d 3$, & Nev. 44, rehearing denied. 5nKunction

&$4 (eatious+litigant restrictive order against roer+erson civil litigant did not satis21 requirement

o2 creating adequate record 2or aellate revie= hile order contained artial elana+ tion, i.e., that

litigant reeatedl1, in that case and others, asted tateGs resources ith meritless and unintelligi@le

2ilings that did not con2orm ith court rules, and hile order included to eamles o2 such 2ilings,

order did not otherise contain list o2 2ilings and rulings that led court to imose @road 2iling

restriction, and order did not su22icientl1 indicate that litigant had reviousl1 instituted other suits that

ere determined meritless or otherise resulted in adverse resolution. ordan v. tate e rel. Det. o2

>otor (ehicles and u@lic a2et1, &$$%, $ .3d 3$, & Nev. 44, rehearing denied. 5nKunction &$4

!nce the roer+erson civil lainti22Gs alication to roceed in 2orma aueris is granted and the

comlaint is 2iled, the district court is 2ree to revie the comlaintGs merits 2or aarent de2ects, and

i2 the comlaint aears comletel1 2rivolousF on its 2ace, meaning that it aears to lac an

argua@le @asis either in la or in 2act, then the court ma1 direct the cler to de2er issuing the

summonses ending the comletion o2 its revie, and the court ma1 then hold a reliminar1

evidentiar1 hearing ith the lainti22 to determine hether the action should @e alloed to roceed,

and i2 the district court determines that the action or a seci2ic claim is indeed 2rivolous, the court can

dismiss the action or claim. ordan v. tate e rel. Det. o2 >otor (ehicles and u@lic a2et1, &$$%,

$ .3d 3$, & Nev. 44, rehearing denied. Costs &)= Costs 3&I? *he dismissal o2 a comlaint as

2rivolous, @ased on in2ormation o@tained in a reliminar1 evidentiar1 hearing a2ter the roer+erson

- 19



20/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

civil lainti22 has @een granted in 2orma aueris status and the comlaint has @een 2iled, @ut @e2ore

issuance o2 summonses, is an etreme action, and i2 the comlaint can @e amended to cure an1

aarent de2ects, the lainti22 should @e ermitted to do so. ordan v. tate e rel. Det. o2 >otor

(ehicles and u@lic a2et1, &$$%, $ .3d 3$, & Nev. 44, rehearing denied. Costs &)= Costs

3&I? *he initial @urden o2 esta@lishing indigenc1 in civil roceedings rests ith the etitioner, ho

must demonstrate not that he is entirel1 destitute and ithout 2unds, @ut that a1ments 2or counsel

ould lace an undue hardshi on his a@ilit1 to rovide the @asic necessities o2 li2e 2or himsel2 and

his 2amil1. 'odrigueH v. Eighth udicial Dist. Court e rel. Count1 o2 Clar, &$$4, $& .3d 4, &$

Nev. 79), certiorari denied &% .Ct. &9$%, %4% 8.. #, #& .Ed.&d &9). Costs &)= Costs 3&I%?

#. -actors to @e considered *rial court as required to determine hether 2ormer hus@and as

indigent, 2or uroses o2 determining hether he as entitled to aointment o2 counsel in contemt

roceedings 2or nona1ment o2 child suort, and to suort that determination ith 2indings

regarding his 2inancial status, including an1 income derived 2rom @usiness he as aarded in

divorce, his emlo1ment rosects, and otential a@ilit1 to a1. 'odrigueH v. Eighth udicial Dist.

Court e rel. Count1 o2 Clar, &$$4, $& .3d 4, &$ Nev. 79), certiorari denied &% .Ct. &9$%,

%4% 8.. #, #& .Ed.&d &9). Child uort 49= Child uort 494 ;here to eole are living

together and 2unctioning as a single economic unit, hether married, related, or otherise,

consideration o2 their com@ined 2inancial assets ma1 @e arranted 2or the uroses o2 determining a

art1Gs indigenc1 status in a civil roceeding. 'odrigueH v. Eighth udicial Dist. Court e rel. Count1

o2 Clar, &$$4, $& .3d 4, &$ Nev. 79), certiorari denied &% .Ct. &9$%, %4% 8.. #, #&

.Ed.&d &9). Costs &) ;hen con2ronted ith a art1 ho is ill2ull1 underemlo1ed, eseciall1 2or

uroses o2 avoiding court+ordered suort a1ments, additional inquir1 into hether the art1 is

indigent is required= in such case, it is rudent 2or the court to consider the emlo1a@ilit1 o2 the

- 20



21/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

nona1ing art1 and hat his a@ilit1 to a1 ould @e i2 emlo1ment ere ursued and o@tained.

'odrigueH v. Eighth udicial Dist. Court e rel. Count1 o2 Clar, &$$4, $& .3d 4, &$ Nev. 79),

certiorari denied &% .Ct. &9$%, %4% 8.. #, #& .Ed.&d &9). Child uort #$$= Costs &)

-actors articularl1 relevant to the determination o2 hether a art1 to a civil roceeding is indigent

are I? the art1Gs emlo1ment status and income, including income 2rom government sources such as

social securit1 and unemlo1ment @ene2its, I&? the onershi o2 an1 unencum@ered assets, including

real or ersonal roert1 and monies on deosit, and 2inall1, I3? the art1Gs total inde@tedness and an1

2inancial assistance received 2rom 2amil1 or close 2riends. 'odrigueH v. Eighth udicial Dist. Court e

rel. Count1 o2 Clar, &$$4, $& .3d 4, &$ Nev. 79), certiorari denied &% .Ct. &9$%, %4% 8..

#, #& .Ed.&d &9). Costs &) 7. ;aiver o2 securit1 2or costs Nonresident lainti22 as not

required to ost securit1 2or costs in civil action, here trial court entered in 2orma aueris order

hich included language e22ectivel1 ecusing securit1 requirement, though later oral and ritten

orders addressed securit1 requirement= oral orders ere never reduced to riting and the1 did not

vacate in 2orma aueris order, and to etent that an1 ritten orders addressed securit1 requirement,

the1 did not eressl1 vacate in 2orma aueris order and no order as entered at a time earl1 enough

in roceedings to e22ectivel1 give lainti22 an1 oortunit1 to resond @1 osting securit1. ordan v.

tate e rel. Det. o2 >otor (ehicles and u@lic a2et1, &$$%, $ .3d 3$, & Nev. 44, rehearing

denied. Costs 33 Neither the statute ermitting a district court to allo an indigent lainti22 to

commence a civil action ithout costs, nor an1 other statute, clearl1 and mani2estl1 removed district

courtGs inherent oer to aive, uon 2inding o2 indigenc1, statutor1 requirement that nonresident

lainti22 ost securit1 2or costs. ordan v. tate e rel. Det. o2 >otor (ehicles and u@lic a2et1,

&$$%, $ .3d 3$, & Nev. 44, rehearing denied. Costs &) ). -rivolous claims *he dismissal o2 a

comlaint as 2rivolous, @ased on in2ormation o@tained in a reliminar1 evidentiar1 hearing a2ter the

- 21



22/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

roer+erson civil lainti22 has @een granted in 2orma aueris status and the comlaint has @een

2iled, @ut @e2ore issuance o2 summonses, is an etreme action, and i2 the comlaint can @e amended

to cure an1 aarent de2ects, the lainti22 should @e ermitted to do so. ordan v. tate e rel. Det. o2

>otor (ehicles and u@lic a2et1, &$$%, $ .3d 3$, & Nev. 44, rehearing denied. Costs &)=

Costs 3&I? !nce the roer+erson civil lainti22Gs alication to roceed in 2orma aueris is

granted and the comlaint is 2iled, the district court is 2ree to revie the comlaintGs merits 2or

aarent de2ects, and i2 the comlaint aears comletel1 2rivolousF on its 2ace, meaning that it

aears to lac an argua@le @asis either in la or in 2act, then the court ma1 direct the cler to de2er

issuing the summonses ending the comletion o2 its revie, and the court ma1 then hold a

reliminar1 evidentiar1 hearing ith the lainti22 to determine hether the action should @e alloed

to roceed, and i2 the district court determines that the action or a seci2ic claim is indeed 2rivolous,

the court can dismiss the action or claim. ordan v. tate e rel. Det. o2 >otor (ehicles and u@lic

a2et1, &$$%, $ .3d 3$, & Nev. 44, rehearing denied. Costs &)= Costs 3&I? N. '. . &.$%,

N( * &.$% Current through the &$$9 7%th 'egular ession and the &$$ th ecial ession o2

the Nevada egislature and technical corrections received 2rom the egislative Counsel Bureau

I&$$?. IC? &$ *homson 'euters. No Claim to !rig. 8 EN*

Civil rights actions, revailing art1, nominal damages, see -arrar v. 6o@@1, 8..*e.99&, 3

.Ct. %##, %$# 8.. $3, & .Ed.&d 494. revailing art1, signi2icant issue test, see *eas tate

*eachers 0ssGn v. otion to 0lter or 0mend !rder 022irming ummar1 Eviction !'der


23/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

*eachers 0ssGn v. otion to 0mend or 0lter the !rder o2 Novem@er &9, 973,F hich as 2iled @1

eecutorGs counsel on 0ril , 97% in order to o@tain a reduction in legal 2ees aarded attorne1s 2or nonresident heirs in

ro@ate roceeding, as 2iled man1 months a2ter eiration o2 the 3$+da1 statutor1 eriod and, hence, as untimel1

assuming that it as in adequate 2orm and that the relie2 it sought as availa@le. N.'.. %%.9$= 'ules Civ.roc., 'ule

%&I@?= 'ules 0.roc., 'ule 4Ia?. >atter o2 Estate o2 6errmann, 9)4, #77 .&d %94, $$ Nev. , rehearing denied #79

.&d &4#, $$ Nev. 49. ;ills

III. CONCLUSION

Plese )e$onsi(e) o) lte) o) *en( o)(e) ffi)*ing the s%**)# e-i$tion o)(e).

AFFIRMATION P%)s%nt to NRS 8>B2.;>;

*he undersigned does here@1 a22irm that the receding document does not contain the social

securit1 num@er o2 an1 erson.

D0*ED this 0ril #th, &$&.

JsJ Zach Coughlin, signed electronicall1

Zach Coughlin, Esq.

0ellant

- 23



24/25

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROOF OF SERICE

5, Zach Coughlin, declare:

!n this date, 5, >r. Zach Coughlin served the 2oregoing document @1 2aing andserving uon registered e2ilers via electronicall1 2iling:

'ichard att >erliss, >D

D0*ED this 0ril #th, &$&.

JsJ Zach Coughlin, signed electronicall1

Zach Coughlin, Esq.

0ellant

- 24



25/25

****** IMPORTANT NOTICE - READ THIS INFORMATION *****PROOF OF SERVICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING

A filing has been submitted to the court RE: CV11-03628

Judge: PATRICK FLANAGAN

Official File Stamp: 04-07-2012:00:25:43

Clerk Accepted: 04-09-2012:11:13:42

Court: Second Judicial District Court - State of Nevada

Case Title:ZACHARY COUGHLIN VS. MATTHEW

MERLISS (D7)

Document(s) Submitted: Mtn Alter or Amend Judgment

Filed By: ZACHARY COUGHLIN, ESQ.You may review this filing by clicking on the

following link to take you to your cases.

This notice was automatically generated by the courts auto-notification system.

If service is not required for this document (e.g., Minutes), please disregard the below language.

The following people were served electronically:

CASEY BAKER, ESQ. for MATTHEW MERLISSRICHARD HILL, ESQ. for MATTHEW MERLISS

ZACHARY COUGHLIN, ESQ. for ZACHARY

COUGHLIN

The following people have not been served electronically and must be served by traditional

means (see Nevada electronic filing rules):
https://wceflex.washoecourts.com/notify?pageAction=ViewCaseshttps://wceflex.washoecourts.com/notify?pageAction=ViewCases

4 7 12 motion to alter or amend order affirming summary eviction 03628 entire eflex combined...

Documents