44 study notes paper p1 performance operations docs/2010 syllabus... · 2012-05-18 · 44 study...

2
44 Study notes ‘CIMA provides cumulative discount factor tables at the back of the exam paper’ Paper P1 Operations Performance By the examiner for paper P1 When you’re conducting investment appraisals or making capital budgeting decisions, the annualised equivalent method will allow you to make a proper comparison of assets with unequal lifespans Q uestion 4 of the November 2011 Performance Operations paper presented a scenario in which a company needed to decide between two replacement computer systems that had different lifespans. Many candidates calculated the net present values (NPVs) of both systems, but didn’t seem to appreciate that these weren’t directly comparable, because the first system had a lifespan of three years while the second would last for five years. The second system’s NPV ($671,000) worked out as significantly higher than that of the first one ($350,000). But if the company were to choose system one, it would be able to invest in another after three years. The systems’ NPVs needed to be adjusted so that they could be compared on a like- for-like basis. One way of doing this is known as the annualised equivalent method – indeed, the ques- tion directed candidates to take this approach. A similar situation occurs when a company needs to determine how long to keep an asset before rep- lacing it. A good example of this type of decision concerns the replacement of vehicles – a problem faced by both companies and individuals. The fol- lowing example demonstrates how the annualised equivalent method applies in such situations. Just In Time Every Time (JITET) is a large org- anisation that specialises in delivering goods from retailers to consumers. The company, which has more than 100 vans, is considering whether it should replace these vehicles after three, four or five years. Tables 1, 2 and 3 contain the investment appraisal for each option based on a cost of capital of ten per cent. But the NPVs calculated for each option cannot be compared with each other, since they cover different periods. Is the NPV of £35,345 for the three-year replace- ment better than the figures calculated for the other options? A simple solution would be to calculate an average for each option as follows: l Three years: £35,345 ÷ 3 = £11,782. l Four years: £44,224 ÷ 4 = £11,056. l Five years: £53,289 ÷ 5 = £10,658. These calculations indicate that JITET should actually use a five-year replacement cycle, because this produces the lowest annual cost, but they don’t provide a valid comparison, either. The three options can be compared only by calculating an annualised equivalent cost for each one. In order to do this, a cumulative discount factor or annuity factor must be obtained for three, four and five years. Fortunately, this is not difficult to do. CIMA provides cumulative discount factor 1. Replace the vans after three years Year Investment Running costs Residual value Net cash flow 0 -£15,000 -£15,000 1 -£9,900 -£9,900 2 -£10,000 -£10,000 3 -£10,100 £6,000 -£4,100 4 0 5 0 Cost of capital 10% NPV -£35,345 2. Replace the vans after four years Year Investment Running costs Residual value Net cash flow 0 -£15,000 -£15,000 1 -£9,900 -£9,900 2 -£10,000 -£10,000 3 -£10,100 -£10,100 4 -£10,400 £4,000 -£6,400 5 0 Cost of capital 10% NPV -£44,224 3. Replace the vans after five years Year Investment Running costs Residual value Net cash flow 0 -£15,000 -£15,000 1 -£9,900 -£9,900 2 -£10,000 -£10,000 3 -£10,100 -£10,100 4 -£10,400 -£10,400 5 -£11,200 £1,000 -£10,200 Cost of capital 10% NPV -£53,289

Upload: others

Post on 17-Mar-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 44 Study notes Paper P1 Performance Operations docs/2010 syllabus... · 2012-05-18 · 44 Study notes ‘CIMA provides cumulative discount factor tables at the back of the exam paper’

44 Study notes

‘CIMA provides cumulative discount factor tables at the back of the exam paper’

Paper P1

OperationsPerformance

By the examiner for paper P1

When you’re conducting investment appraisals or making capital budgeting decisions, the annualised equivalent method will allow you to make a proper comparison of assets with unequal lifespans

Q uestion 4 of the November 2011 Performance Operations paper presented a scenario in which a company needed to decide between two replacement computer systems that had different lifespans. Many

candidates calculated the net present values (NPVs) of both systems, but didn’t seem to appreciate that these weren’t directly comparable, because the first system had a lifespan of three years while the second would last for five years.

The second system’s NPV ($671,000) worked out as significantly higher than that of the first one ($350,000). But if the company were to choose system one, it would be able to invest in another after three years. The systems’ NPVs needed to be adjusted so that they could be compared on a like-for-like basis. One way of doing this is known as the annualised equivalent method – indeed, the ques-tion directed candidates to take this approach.

A similar situation occurs when a company needs to determine how long to keep an asset before rep-lacing it. A good example of this type of decision concerns the replacement of vehicles – a problem faced by both companies and individuals. The fol-lowing example demonstrates how the annualised equivalent method applies in such situations.

Just In Time Every Time (JITET) is a large org-anisation that specialises in delivering goods from retailers to consumers. The company, which has more than 100 vans, is considering whether it should replace these vehicles after three, four or five years. Tables 1, 2 and 3 contain the investment appraisal for each option based on a cost of capital of ten per cent. But the NPVs calculated for each option cannot be compared with each other, since they cover different periods.

Is the NPV of £35,345 for the three-year replace-ment better than the figures calculated for the other options? A simple solution would be to calculate an average for each option as follows:

l Three years: £35,345 ÷ 3 = £11,782.l Four years: £44,224 ÷ 4 = £11,056.l Five years: £53,289 ÷ 5 = £10,658.

These calculations indicate that JITET should actually use a five-year replacement cycle, because this produces the lowest annual cost, but they don’t provide a valid comparison, either. The three options can be compared only by calculating an annualised equivalent cost for each one.

In order to do this, a cumulative discount factor or annuity factor must be obtained for three, four and five years. Fortunately, this is not difficult to do. CIMA provides cumulative discount factor

1. Replace the vans after three yearsYear Investment Running costs Residual value Net cash flow0 -£15,000 -£15,0001 -£9,900 -£9,9002 -£10,000 -£10,0003 -£10,100 £6,000 -£4,1004 05 0

Cost of capital 10% NPV -£35,345

2. Replace the vans after four yearsYear Investment Running costs Residual value Net cash flow0 -£15,000 -£15,0001 -£9,900 -£9,9002 -£10,000 -£10,0003 -£10,100 -£10,1004 -£10,400 £4,000 -£6,4005 0

Cost of capital 10% NPV -£44,224

3. Replace the vans after five yearsYear Investment Running costs Residual value Net cash flow0 -£15,000 -£15,0001 -£9,900 -£9,9002 -£10,000 -£10,0003 -£10,100 -£10,1004 -£10,400 -£10,4005 -£11,200 £1,000 -£10,200

Cost of capital 10% NPV -£53,289

Page 2: 44 Study notes Paper P1 Performance Operations docs/2010 syllabus... · 2012-05-18 · 44 Study notes ‘CIMA provides cumulative discount factor tables at the back of the exam paper’

46

Paper P1Performance Operations

Study notes

tables at the back of the exam paper, so you won’t need to apply a formula. The cumulative discount factor for three years is found here by identifying the factor in the interest rate column of ten per cent for period three – ie, 2.487. The cumulative discount factors for four and five years can found underneath this figure and are 3.170 and 3.791 respectively. So the annualised equivalent costs of each option are as follows:l Three years: £35,345 ÷ 2.487 = £14,212. l Four years: £44,224 ÷ 3.170 = £13,951. l Five years: £53,289 ÷ 3.791 = £14,057.

From these calculations, JITET should use a four-year replacement policy, since this entails the lowest annual cost.

It is possible to perform this type of analysis using the lowest-common-multiple method. This evalu-ates the options over a common time horizon that covers complete cycles of all the alternatives. The problem with this approach is that it can involve a significant number of calculations. For example, JITET would have to use a 60-year period to evalu-ate the alternative replacement cycles, since this is the smallest number divisible by three, four and five.

Most investment appraisal projects also have qualitative factors associated with them. These are

hard to express in financial terms. In this case JITET might be concerned that using older vehicles could tarnish the company’s image and delay its introduc-tion of more efficient new vans that should come on to the market in the next few years. It isn’t easy to get it right, but calculating annualised equivalent costs for these types of decisions will help compa-nies to compare apples and pears.

CIMA corporate centre 26 Chapter Street,London SW1P 4NP T: +44 (0)20 8849 2251E: cima.contact@ cimaglobal.comwww.cimaglobal.comCIMA Australia 5 Hunter Street, Sydney, NSW 2000T: +61 (0)2 9376 9902E: [email protected] Bangladesh Suite 309, RM Center, (3rd Floor), 101 Gulshan Avenue, Dhaka-1212T: +8802 881 5724E: zareef.matin@ cimaglobal.comCIMA Botswana Plot 50374 , Block 3, 1st Floor, Southern Wing, Fairgrounds Financial Centre, GaboroneT: +267 395 2362E: [email protected] China: head officeUnit 1508A, 15th Floor, Azia Center, 1233 Lujiazui Ring Road, Pudong, Shanghai 200120T: +86 (0)21 6160 1558E: [email protected] China: BeijingC 201, 2/F Landmark Tower 2, 8 North Dongsanhuan Road,Beijing 100004

T: +86 (0)10 6590 0751 E: [email protected] China: ChongqingRoom 1202, Metropolitan Plaza, 68 Zou Rong Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing 400010T: +86 (0)23 6371 3538 E: [email protected] China: Shenzhen16/F, CITIC City Plaza,Shennan Road Central, Shenzhen 518031T: +86 (0)755 3330 5151 E: [email protected] Ghana3rd Floor, Ayele Building,IPS/Attraco Road,Madina, AccraT: +233 (0)30 250 3407E: [email protected] Hong KongSuite 2005, 20th Floor, Tower One, Times Square, 1 Matheson Street, Causeway Bay, Hong KongT: +852 (0)2511 2003E: [email protected] India Unit 1-A-1, 3rd Floor, Vibgyor Towers, C-62, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai 400051T: +91 22 4237 0100E: [email protected]

CIMA Ireland5th Floor, Block E, Iveagh Court, Harcourt Road, Dublin 2T: +353 (0)1 643 0400E: cima.ireland@ cimaglobal.comCIMA Malaysia: head office CIMA Malaysia, Lots 1.03b & 1.05, Level 1, KPMG Tower, 8 First Avenue, Bandar Utama, 47800 Petaling Jaya, Selangor Darul EhsanT: +60 (0)3 77 230230E: kualalumpur@ cimaglobal.comCIMA Malaysia: SarawakSublot 315, 1st Floor, 21 Jalan Bukit Mata, 93100 Kuching, Sarawak T: +6082 233136E: [email protected] CIMA Malaysia: PenangSuite 12-04A, 12th Floor, Menara Boustead Penang,39 Jalan Sultan Ahmad Shah, 10050 PenangT: +60 (0)4 226 7488E: [email protected] Middle EastOffice E01, 1st Floor, Block 3,PO Box 502221, Dubai Knowledge Village, Al Sofouh Road, Dubai, United Arab EmiratesT: +9714 434 7370E: [email protected]

CIMA NigeriaLandmark Virtual Office, 5th Floor, Mulliner Towers, 39 Alfred Rewane Road, Ikoyi, LagosT: +234 1 463 8353 (ext 518)E: [email protected] Pakistan 201, 2nd Floor, Business Arcade, Plot 27-A, Block 6, PECHS, Shahra-e-faisal, KarachiT: +92 21 3432 2387E: [email protected] Pakistan: Islamabad1st Floor, Rehman Chambers,Fazal-e-Haq Road, Blue Area, IslamabadT: + 92 51 260 5701-6CIMA Pakistan: LahoreFlat 1, 2, 1st Floor, Front Block 3, Awami Complex at 1-4, Usman Block, New Garden Town, LahoreT: +92 42 3594 0311-16CIMA PolandWarsaw Financial Centre , Floor 11, ul Emilii Plater 53,00-113 Warsaw T: +48 22 528 6651E: [email protected] RussiaOffice 4009, 4th floor,Zemlyanoj Val 9, Moscow 105064 T: +7495 967 9328E: [email protected]

CIMA Singapore3 Phillip Street, Commerce Point, Level 19, Singapore 048693T: +65 68248252E: [email protected] South Africa 1st Floor, 198 Oxford Road, Illovo 2196T: +27 11 788 8723 E: johannesburg@ cimaglobal.comCIMA Sri Lanka356 Elvitigala, Mawatha,Colombo 05T: +94 (0)11 250 3880E: [email protected] Sri Lanka: Kandy229 Peradeniya Road, KandyT: +94 (0)81 222 7883E: [email protected] UK 26 Chapter Street, London SW1P 4NP T: +44 (0)20 8849 2251E: cima.contact@ cimaglobal.comCIMA Zambia6053 Sibweni Road,Northmead, LusakaT: +260 1 290219E: [email protected] Zimbabwe6th Floor Michael House, 62 Nelson Mandela Ave, HarareT: +263 4 708600E: [email protected]

GlObal cOntact details

Get

ty Im

ages