45 planotes 45 participatory learning and action 45 ...are you new to participatory learning and...

planotes

4545 4545 45 45 45 45 45 45

participatory learning and action

October 2002

Community-basedanimal healthcare

4545 45 4545 45 45 45 45 45

ISSN: 1357-938XISBN: 1 84369 4213

International Institute for Environment and Development3 Endsleigh StreetLondon WC1H 0DD, UK

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7388 2117Fax: +44 (0) 20 7388 2826Email: [email protected] Notes website: www.planotes.orgIIED website: www.iied.org

Are you new to participatory learning and action (PLA) approachesand seeking practical tips and guidance? Or an experiencedpractitioner or trainer, looking for new ideas and ways of sharingyour experience with others?

PLA Notes is the world’s leading informal journal on participatoryapproaches and methods, and draws on the expertise of guesteditors to provide up-to-the minute accounts of the developmentand use of participatory methods in specific fields. Since its firstissue in 1987, PLA Notes has provided a forum for those engagedin participatory work – community workers, activists andresearchers – to share their experiences, conceptual reflections andmethodological innovations with others, providing a genuine ‘voicefrom the field’. It is a vital resource for those working to enhancethe participation of ordinary people in local, regional, national andinternational decision making, in both South and North.

October 2002 <pla notes 45> 1

SPECIAL ISSUE: Community-based animal health care1. Overview: Community-based animal health workers, policies,

and institutions by Andy Catley and Tim Leyland........................................42. Community-based animal healthcare, participation, and policy: where are

we now? by The IDL Group and Constance McCorkle ..............................83. Community-based animal health workers and institutional change: the

DELIVERI Project in Indonesia by Cokro S. Leksmono and John Young ....134. A participatory approach to assessing the impact of a

community-based animal health project with Maasai communities in Tanzania by Steven Nalitolela and Rob Allport ......................................17

5. Participatory impact assessment in Ethiopia: linking policy reform to field experiences by Charles Hopkins and Alistair Short ........................23

6. Community participation and the global eradication of rinderpest by Jeffrey Mariner, Peter Roeder, and Berhanu Admassu..........................29

7. Village animal health workers in Nepal: the pros and cons of developing a National Skills Test by Karen Stoufer, Narayan D. Ojha, and Anand Parajuli ....................................................................................34

8. Doing it for themselves: how communities developed messages and communication methods for rinderpest eradication in southern Sudan by Bryony Jones, Aluma Araba, Peter Koskei, and Samuel Letereuwa ..............................................................................37

9. Linking research and community-based animal healthcare in East Africa by Andy Catley, Lieve Lynen, and Steven Nalitolela ................42

10. Community-based animal health training and creative change in Bolivia by Susan E Stewart ........................................................49

REGULARSEditorial..............................................................................................................2General section:11. The Innovation Tree: a new PRA tool to reveal the innovation adoption

and diffusion process by Paul Van Mele and A.K.M. Zakaria ....................5412. In our own words: investigating disability in Morocco by Chris McIvor ....5913. Sustainable Development Observatories in Manizales, Colombia

by Luz Estela Velásquez, translated by Kimberly Vilar................................6314. Los Observatorios para el Desarrollo Sostenibles en Manizales,

Colombia by Luz Estela Velásquez ............................................................6715. Market scoping: methods to help people understand their

marketing environment by Ben Bennett....................................................71Tips for Trainers ................................................................................................76In Touch ............................................................................................................77RCPLA Pages ....................................................................................................82

CON

TENTS

planotesNumber 45

October 2002

Well establishedcommunity-basedprogrammes insouthern Sudan useparticipatory methodsto analyse livestockdisease problems

EDIT

ORI

AL

2 <pla notes 45> October 2002

editorial

diagnose and treat health problems,play an important role in helpingnational strategies for vaccination,assist with the collection of samplesfor disease surveillance, and providedata for other forms of research. Theycan also play an important role inmobilising and informing communi-ties about animal health issues, in aparticipatory way. The articles look atboth the pros and cons of the CAHWapproach, issues around training,remuneration, and effectiveness, andprovide insightful, critical reflectionsfor both policy-makers and donorsalike.

The guest editors for this specialissue are Andy Catley and TimLeyland. Andy Catley previouslyworked on community-based animalhealth projects with NGOs in theHorn of Africa. He also worked withIIED’s Sustainable Agriculture andRural Livelihoods Programme on ourParticipatory Methods in VeterinaryEpidemiology (PAVE) project (1998-2000), which was supported by DFID’sAnimal Health Programme, and isauthor of Methods on the Move, areview of veterinary uses of participa-tory approaches and methods focus-ing on experiences in dryland Africa.Currently, Andy is a veterinarianworking in the Community-basedAnimal Health and ParticipatoryEpidemiology (CAPE) Unit for theAfrican Union’s Interafrican Bureau forAnimal Resources (OAU-IBAR), onsecondment from the Feinstein Inter-national Famine Centre (FIFC), TuftsUniversity, USA.

Tim Leyland heads the Commu-nity-based Animal Health and Partici-patory Epidemiology (CAPE) Unit inOAU-IBAR, also on secondment fromFIFC. Tim has been managingcommunity-based livestock initiativesin OAU-IBAR and previously coordi-nated the UNICEF-Operation Lifeline

Sudan Livestock Programme in south-ern Sudan. He has also worked inAfghanistan and Papua New Guinea.

General sectionThe general section in this issueincludes five articles.

Paul van Mele and AKM Zakariawrite about a new participatory rapidappraisal (PRA) tool called the Innova-tion Tree, which helps people to visu-alise and analyse how an innovation isspread between communitymembers, and how it can help themto understand some of the social andpsychological dimensions that influ-ence the adoption and diffusion of aninnovation within a community.

The article ‘In our own words’ byChris McIvor looks at issues aroundsustainability and institutionalisation,in the context of informing servicesfor disabled citizens in Morocco. Hediscusses issues of discrimination andequal representation, such as thoseaffecting poorer disabled families andwomen, and how to ensure thegenuine and meaningful inclusion ofdisabled people in research exercises.

Next, we have an article from LuzEstela Velásquez. It describes a newSustainable Development Observato-ries initiative in Manizales, Colombia,which has been developed in partner-ship with the local governmentauthorities, universities, and civilsociety groups in order to monitor,evaluate, and promote sustainabledevelopment indicators within thecity, and also to facilitate and encour-age citizen participation. As well asthe original Spanish article, there isalso an English version, translated byKimberly Vilar, of IIED America Latina.

Finally, Ben Bennett describes asimple set of tools developed toenable communities to conductmarket scoping. These are tools tohelp people to gather information

Welcome to issue 45 of PLA Notes

Special themeIn this issue, the theme section looksat community-based animal health-care, or participatory epidemiology.Whilst the topic of animal healthcovers many other areas, such asnutrition and animal husbandry, manyof the more progressive recent devel-opments in animal health have beenfocused around participatory epidemi-ology.

In this issue, the authors discusscommunity participation, policy, andinstitutional change, and look atspecific methodologies and impactassessments. The articles highlightrecent explorations and adaptationsof participatory approaches andmethods that have been used tounderstand diseases in animal popu-lations, as a means of improvingdisease control, such as throughcommunity-based animal healthservices.

As many rural populations dependupon the health of their livestock as asource of food and income genera-tion, problems surrounding lack ofaccess to veterinary services, drugs,and incorrect information about drugadministration, can severely impactupon the quality of the animal health-care available.

In particular, the articles in thisissue focus on the role of community-based animal health workers(CAHWs). Whilst CAHWs are nottrained veterinarian staff, there arestill many advantages to the CAHWsystem. CAHWs are usually part ofthe local community, and as such canrespond more quickly to animalhealth needs. With comparativelylittle training, but with the support offormal veterinary and livestock serv-ices, CAHWs can be equipped to

EDITORIALED

ITORIA

L


about marketing systems quickly andsimply, by identifying market informa-tion and key issues that need to beaddressed. These can include, forexample, the dynamics of demand forcertain products and problems associ-ated with inadequate prices receivedfor those products.

Regular featuresIn this issue, Tips for Trainers is anexercise called ‘Hopes and fears’ byJohn Newstrom and Edward Scannell,taken from our Participatory Learningand Action Trainer’s Guide. It is asimple but effective exercise, whichallows participants to share and allevi-ate any fears they might have whenattending a training programme, aswell as giving trainers an opportunityto understand the needs of, andprovide reassurance to, the trainees.

We would like to make anapology to Kamal Singh, whom wefailed to acknowledge as the contrib-utor of the certificate example used inthe ‘Certificate snare’ extract that wasused in the Tips for Trainers section ofour last issue, PLA Notes 44: Local

government and participation. Theextract was taken from RobertChamber’s book Participatory Work-shops: A sourcebook of 21 sets ofideas and activities.

The In Touch section contains allof our regular features, such as bookreviews, up and coming events andworkshops, and news from theRCPLA Network, as well as our e-participation page, which for thisissue includes websites which focuson community-based animal health,as well as more general contacts.

News flash! Launch of new PLA Noteswebsite: www.planotes.orgWe would like to announce the launchof our new PLA Notes website, whichincludes abstracts, contents listings,and ordering information for all backissues, as well as author guidelines andhow to contribute to the series, infor-mation about the RCPLA (ResourceCentres for Participatory Learning andAction) Network, links to other partici-pation-related publications publishedby IIED, information about forthcom-ing issues, the PLA Notes CD ROM,

and much more. There is also a freesample issue of PLA Notes 40: Deliber-ative democracy and citizen empower-ment online in portable documentformat (PDF). We hope that you canfind the time to visit the website, andplease let us know what you think!Send your comments to the usualaddress, or email [email protected]

Lastly, we would like to thankAndy and Tim, and all the authorswho have contributed to this specialissue section, both for their hard workin producing and collating the mate-rial, and also for sharing with us theirexperience and expertise on thesubject of community-based animalhealthcare. Many thanks are also dueto everyone else who has worked on,and contributed to, this issue of PLANotes: the authors, editorial team, theRCPLA Network, Cristina Zorat andBansuri Taneja, the designer AndySmith, and Angela Milligan.

We hope that you enjoy this issueof PLA Notes, and as always, wewelcome your feedback and contributions.Holly Ashley, Acting Editor

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E


sations involved in livestock research and development. Forexample, research conducted by IIED and others showed howparticipatory methods could be adapted into useful diseaseinvestigation and epidemiological tools.2 When used by expe-rienced practitioners, the methods were also reliable and validcompared with conventional methods. In Africa, interest inparticipatory methods has led to the emergence of partici-patory epidemiology as a distinct but complementary branchof veterinary epidemiology, which is now attracting interestfrom national epidemiology units within government veteri-nary services in Africa. Thus, participatory approaches andmethods are becoming more mainstream and used by seniorgovernment epidemiologists and researchers, often in combi-nation with conventional approaches.

About this issueIn the mid to late 1990s more evidence began to emergeabout the positive impact of CAHWs, their capacity toprevent or treat livestock disease, and the effect on people’slivelihoods. Good impact was noted in communities, varyingfrom pastoralist communities in lowland Kenya, to settledfarmers in highland Nepal. However, despite encouragingstudies and reports from many countries, there were alsomajor concerns about the long-term viability of CAHWs. Notleast, in most countries where CAHWs existed, they were

IntroductionIn April 1994 a special issue of RRA Notes1, was dedicated tolivestock. The issue focused on participatory methods andplanning, and drew heavily on experiences from community-based livestock projects. The case studies in the 1994 issuereflected the range of interviewing, visualisation, and scoringmethods, which livestock workers were beginning to use andadapt at that time. Some papers discussed how communi-ties were involved in analysing livestock problems and iden-tifying solutions. One solution was the local selection ofpeople for training as community-based animal healthworkers (CAHWs). These workers were usually given a shorttraining and depending on the communities and livestockrearing systems in question, different animal health andproduction topics were covered in the curriculum.

In the following years, participatory methods were usedand adapted by an increasing number and range of organi-

by ANDY CATLEY and TIM LEYLAND

1Overview: Community-basedanimal health workers, policies,and institutions

1 RRA Notes 20: Special issue on livestock. C. Watson and A Collis (Eds). 1994. IIED:London2 PAVE – The Participatory Approaches to Veterinary Epidemiology project (1998-2000) examined options for using participatory appraisal in veterinary epidemiologyand focused on animal health services and information systems in pastoral areas ofAfrica. PAVE was led by Andy Catley and funded by the Animal Health Programmeof the UK Department for International Development. The project produced severaljournal articles, as well as a practitioner’s guide entitled, Methods on the Move: A Review of Veterinary Uses of Participatory Approaches and Methods Focussingon Experiences in Dryland Africa, which is available from IIED.

SPECIAL ISSU

E


Overview: Community-based animal health workers, policies, and institutions 1

officially illegal. In some countries, the veterinary authoritiessimply turned a blind eye to CAHWs, whereas in otherspowerful professional bodies launched anti-CAHWcampaigns. In nearly all cases, veterinarians were unwillingto work in the remote, underdeveloped areas where poorerlivestock keepers lived. Hence, without these frontlinecommunity-based animal health workers, there would befew, if any veterinary services at all in large parts of manydeveloping countries.

This issue of PLA Notes focuses on the policy and institu-tional aspects of scaling up and official recognition ofCAHWs. The first paper by the IDL Group and ConstanceMcCorkle presents some common arguments made byveterinarians against CAHWs in the context of policy reform,privatisation, and global trade in livestock products. The clearmessage from this paper is that important technical concernsabout the recognitions and wider use of CAHWs are wellknown and can largely be addressed, but professional normsand conservatism have hindered progress. Other papers showhow at national level, policy makers can be influenced indifferent ways.

Looking at community-based approaches from a diseasecontrol angle, Jeffrey Mariner and colleagues show how theprofile of CAHWs and understanding of community partici-pation was improved when CAHWs were used to helpcontrol rinderpest. This disease was a huge concern for live-stock keepers, national veterinary services, and the interna-tional community. When CAHWs proved to be crucial forvaccinating cattle against rinderpest in Africa, policy makersand senior vets in international agencies started to takenotice. Working in southern Sudan, Bryony Jones andcolleagues at VSF Belgium describe how a large-scalecommunity-based programme continued to assist rinderpesteradication by developing and disseminating messages aboutthe cessation of vaccination and the need for disease surveil-lance. As Cathy Watson and Adrian Cullis advised in theireditorial in the 1994 issue of RRA Notes, we need to ‘learnabout local communication methods and channels’. Thesouthern Sudan paper is a good example of this, as localknowledge and communication methods formed the core ofthis innovative initiative. Both papers on rinderpest control inthis issue discuss professional attitudes and how the processof ‘seeing is believing’ changed the way vets perceived theknowledge and capacity of livestock keepers.

Cokro Leksmono and John Young view the adoption ofCAHWs from the perspective of institutional change andprivatisation in Indonesia. They describe how central and localgovernment learnt about and tested community-basedapproaches, and provide evidence of impact that helped to

establish CAHWs as an accepted service provider. Impactassessment of CAHWs is certainly a useful way to influencepolicy makers, and two other papers in this issue describeparticipatory impact assessment. Working with Maasaicommunities in northern Tanzania, Stephen Nalitolela andRob Allport present a methodology for measuring change,attributing change to CAHWs (and others), and usingcommunity-derived indicators to assess benefits in terms ofhuman livelihoods. Charles Hopkins and Alistair Short linkparticipatory impact assessment to policy debate by involv-ing agencies that influence or make policy in Ethiopia. Theirwork with local stakeholders included the establishment of anational impact assessment team to look at CAHW issuesand tried to overcome the problem of policy makers reject-ing studies of which they were not aware or involved in.

Experiences with developing a national skills test aredescribed by Karen Stoufer and colleagues in Nepal, which isalso related to recognition of CAHWs. This article shows howperceptions of training needs, duration of training, and previ-ous education of trainees can vary between field-level NGOworkers and decision-makers in government. Despiteevidence that short training courses were successful andbetter suited to realities on the ground, official recognitionof the more appropriate training approach was slow toemerge. This is a common experience in other countries,where the quality of CAHW training tends to be judged byofficialdom according to the duration of training rather thanthe quality of training or the impact of CAHWs in theircommunities. Veterinarians with limited hands-on experienceof community-based approaches also tend to insist on higherlevels of education and literacy among CAHWs than is reallyneeded for them to work effectively.

Finally, Susan Stewart describes the key elements of aprogramme to support community-based animal healthtraining and service delivery, which has been replicated inseveral parts of Bolivia. The programme distinguishedbetween training Farmer Trainers and CAHWs. Farmer Train-ers are local people who own land in the community, have ahistory of service and a strong desire to serve, have a highemotional intelligence (people skills), have some experience

“Without these frontline community-based animal healthworkers, there would be few, if anyveterinary services at all in large partsof many developing countries”

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E


Andy Catley and Tim Leyland1

with livestock production, are recommended by trustedinformants as gregarious people who connect people to oneanother, are part-time, paid staff of the project or local organ-isation, and work in teams throughout the region. CAHWs inthis programme are people who provide preventive and somecurative care with livestock as well as facilitate training in theirown villages. They are trained as change agents in theirvillage organisations, and trained as trainers with listeningand facilitation skills. Together, Farmer Trainers and techni-cians train the CAHWs. CAHWs are viewed as an integralpart of the village development process and are chosen bythe villagers themselves. These programmes continue toshow excellent results even after the project funding hasbeen discontinued because of the motivation and creativityof the local people involved.

Future challenges facing community-based animalhealthcareFor many of the challenges facing CAHW programmesdescribed in this issue, there is evidence of progress. Morecountries are looking critically at CAHWs and deciding if andhow these workers can be supported by appropriate policiesand legislation. In some countries, processes are underway toharmonise CAHW training approaches and curricula atnational level. For example, in Kenya a national CAHW curricu-lum has been developed and includes core skills and knowl-edge required by all CAHWs, but also allows scope for trainingin animal health problems according to local priorities.

As governments become more aware of CAHWs, there

are also moves to strengthen the role of CAHWs in diseasereporting and contributing to national disease surveillancesystems. This becomes particularly important as countries tryto demonstrate national disease status to trading partnersaccording to WTO guidelines. Countries such as Ethiopia andTanzania are exploring ways to use information provided byCAHWs in remote areas to complement existing diseaseinformation systems. However, the challenge is how to feedback information to communities and create a two-way rela-tionship, rather than using CAHWs for ‘data mining’.

In an era of privatisation of veterinary services, one wayto improve the financial sustainability of CAHWs is to linkthem to private suppliers of veterinary medicines, such asveterinarians. As these linkages develop, it will interesting tosee how community perceptions of an ideal CAHW comparewith the qualities preferred by private pharmacy owners orsimilar. One viewpoint is that communities and a private vetboth want a local ‘agent’ who is knowledgeable about live-stock, hard working, and trusted. If, for example, the selec-tion process for CAHWs involves both communities and aprivate vet, perhaps a joint decision can be reached regard-ing what makes a good CAHW. While profit may be the mainmotivation for the private sector, social norms and peer pres-sure exerted through traditional means will also have a stronginfluence on how CAHWs behave and the service theyprovide. With time, we’ll learn more about the compatibilityof participation and privatisation, and options for combinedapproaches to primary animal health service delivery.

ABOUT THE GUEST EDITORSAndy Catley and Tim LeylandCommunity-based Animal Health and Partici-patory Epidemiology (CAPE) Unit,Pan African Programme for the Control ofEpizootics,OAU-IBAR, PO Box 30786, 00100 Nairobi,KENYA.Tel: +254 (2) 2264447fax: +254 (2) 212289www.cape-ibar.org Email: [email protected]: [email protected]

Glossary and acronymsG

LOSSA

RY


Animal Health Assistant (AHA)A veterinary worker, sometimes calleda ‘veterinary assistant’ and usuallywith two years training at an officialtraining institute.

Animal Health Technician (AHT)A veterinary worker, usually witharound six months training, at anofficial training institute.

Community-based Animal HealthWorker (CAHW)A worker selected by the communityand given basic training in animalhealth and related issues, according tolocal priorities. Also called VillageAnimal Health Worker, CommunityLivestock Worker and similar names.

Community-based Animal Health andParticipatory Epidemiology Unit (CAPE)A unit working with the PACEProgramme of OAU-IBAR (see below)specialising in community-basedanimal health systems, with a focus onpolicy and legislative issues.

Cold chainA network of refrigerators fordelivering vaccines or medicines torural areas. The vaccines have to bekept cold to avoid deterioration.

East Coast Fever (ECF)An important disease of cattle in EastAfrica, ECF is transmitted by ticks.

EpidemiologyThe branch of medicine that dealswith the study of the causes,distribution, and control of diseasein populations.

EpizooticThe animal equivalent of anepidemic; a sudden andwidespread disease outbreak.

Global Rinderpest EradicationProgramme (GREP)Coordinated by the Food andAgriculture Organization of theUnited Nations, this programmeaims to eradicate rinderpestworldwide.

Heat stable vaccineA vaccine that maintains itseffectiveness in the absence of coldstorage. Such vaccines can be usedat high ambient temperatures inplaces where there are norefrigeration facilities.

Office Internationale des Epizooties(OIE)The World Organisation for AnimalHealth, the OIE advises theveterinary services of its memberstates about the eradication ofimportant animal diseases andestablishes the health standards forinternational trade in animals andanimal products.

Organisation of the African Union’sInterafrican Bureau for AnimalResources (OAU-IBAR)A technical agency of the AfricanUnion with the mandate to promotelivestock development in Africa.

OrmiloA disease of cattle also called bovinecerebral theileriosis, transmitted byticks and caused by the parasite calledTheileria taurotragi. Affected cattleshow signs of nervous system disease,including walking in circles.

Pan African Programme for the Controlof Epizootics (PACE)A programme of OAU-IBAR aiming tocomplete the eradication ofrinderpest from Africa, improvecontrol of other epizootic diseases,and strengthen nationalepidemiological capacity.

Participatory epidemiologyIn the context of animal health: usingparticipatory methodologies andapproaches to understand diseases inanimal populations as a means toimprove disease control.

ProphylaxisA preventive disease control measure.

RinderpestA highly contagious and severe viraldisease of cattle and wildlife.

Glossary andacronyms

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E


ity of wealthier producers and limited segments of the live-stock sector: colonial settlers and elite or export markets.

Government agencies suffered from a host of additionalproblems. An obvious one was the lack (or the post-colonialdeterioration) of basic infrastructure like roads and refriger-ation facilities for vaccines (‘cold chains’). Other problemsspanned corruption, financial crisis, constant shortages ofcritical inputs (e.g. drugs and vaccines), and political author-ities who were insecure, indecisive, arbitrary, and interven-tionist. Indeed, it was not uncommon for up to 90% ofveterinary-agency funds to go on salaries alone, as govern-ments tried to staff up to provide universal coverage single-handedly. Obviously, this left virtually nothing for operatingexpenses. But even when full operating expenses were avail-able, government veterinary staff were (and in many coun-tries, still are), too few and too poorly distributed andresourced to meet even the most fundamental animal health-care needs of their nations' rural citizenry.

Veterinary privatisation has been widely promoted as asolution to state inefficiencies in service provision. However,efforts have focused in more intensive and commercial live-stock rearing areas using models of private veterinary practicesimilar to those existing in the North. Here, we have a veteri-narian providing a mobile service to farmers and derivingincome from clinical services, sale of drugs and contracts from

Introduction Although community-based animal health workers (CAHWs)have been around for many years, few countries supportCAHW systems with appropriate policies and legislation.However, compelling economic and institutional forces havenow placed CAHWs on the desks of national policy makersand the veterinary profession, and real energy is beingdirected at policy reform to support CAHWs. Reasons forincreased attention to CAHWs include structural reform andprivatisation of veterinary services.

This paper discusses some experiences and commonarguments when engaging central policy makers and veteri-nary professional bodies in order to develop pro-CAHWpolicy.

A changing landscape of veterinary services In the early days of CAHWs, it was the norm in most devel-oping countries for all veterinary services to be delivered bythe state. Emulating patterns established by colonial admin-istrations, many post-independence governments continuedto provide free or subsidised vaccinations, other basic prophy-laxes such as parasite control, and even some therapeuticcare. However, governments failed to appreciate the full costsof universal delivery of veterinary services. Under colonial rule,services were aimed mainly at benefiting only a small minor-

by THE IDL GROUP and CONSTANCE McCORKLE

2Community-based animalhealthcare, participation, andpolicy: where are we now?

SPECIAL ISSU

E


Community-based animal healthcare, participation, and policy: where are we now? 2

government. More remote rural areas of the South haveusually been viewed as non-viable for private veterinary prac-tice and indeed, economic factors such as huge transactioncosts suggest that alternative approaches to privatisation areneeded. The relatively low cost and local acceptability ofCAHWs seems to offer a way forward, particularly if CAHWscan be linked to, and supervised by animal health assistantsor veterinarians running veterinary pharmacies.

Five arguments in the debate about pro-CAHW policyEarly on in the debate, opposition to CAHWs among veteri-nary policy makers, professional bodies and academics wasoften intense and vocal. Some commonly expressed viewsand were as follows:

1. We’ve already been doing this CAHW thing for decades.It doesn’t work and there is nothing new you can tell usabout itThis view relates to old, colonial-style veterinary services inmore remote areas. In these areas, a government DistrictVeterinary Officer would sometimes train local livestockkeepers as ‘Vetscouts’ or vaccinators. The approach recog-nised the value of local animal health knowledge and skills,but differed from later, well-designed CAHW projects basedon joint analysis of problems and solutions, community selec-tion of CAHW trainees and attention to local concerns ratherthan government priorities to control epizootic diseases,often in ‘high potential’ areas.

In other countries, mass animal health trainingprogrammes in the post-colonial period were often targetedat school leavers and again, focused on priorities as perceivedby government and trained workers who were not neces-sarily liked by livestock keepers. In both the vetscout andmass training programmes, workers received incentives fromgovernment that ultimately were not sustained. In contrast,CAHWs seem to work best when supported by the privatesector.

2. These CAHWs are illiterate and backward. There is noway they can diagnose and treat diseasesVets receive a five or six year university education, often basedon curricula borrowed from Northern universities. The notionthat a short, say two-week, training course is sufficient toenable CAHWs to recognise and treat a few diseases is diffi-cult to accept, particularly by veterinary schools and profes-sional associations. There are many issues here:• Urban bias – vet schools tend to produce graduates who

traditionally have expected desk-bound employment withgovernment or who prefer to work in or near major urban

centres. Others move into research careers, but mostresearch is conducted in accessible areas rather than thedistant communities where CAHWs are found. Institutionalknowledge of participatory training techniques for illiteratetrainees and the real, practical problems of delivering serv-ices in remote areas is often limited.

• Professional bias – not least that professional diagnosticskills are automatically superior to indigenous knowledge,and that educated people must know more than illiteratepeople. This argument often overlooks the fact that profes-sional skill depends on practical, hands-on experiencerather than education alone. Yet government veterinaryservices have been severely under-resourced and overlybureaucratic. Are vets practitioners or administrators?

• Where there is no vet – in the absence of access to profes-sional veterinary workers, livestock keepers try to make thebest of what is available. This often means using poor-quality drugs from the black market, or unlicensed andunregulated shops. Sometimes human drugs are used totreat animals. Little advice on the correct use of drugs isavailable from these outlets.

Much of the debate about drug usage by CAHWs centreson drug resistance. The argument goes that misuse of drugssuch as antibiotics encourages drug resistance. When resist-ance spreads to humans, the health of people is put at risk.Similarly, drug residues in foods are generally considered tobe harmful to people.

Established strategies to minimise the risk of resistanceare now well understood. They involve:• Prophylaxis to prevent disease in the first place, meaning

direct measures such as vaccination, or indirect measuresto keep the animal’s overall immunity up.

• Good treatment based on:1. Right diagnosis2. Right choice of medicine3. Right dose rate4. Right period of treatment

“Recent evidence suggests that CAHWsactually improve use of veterinarydrugs. When there is a CAHW, over 70%of livestock keepers would rank them astheir preferred source of animal healthadvice. And in the vast majority of cases,their advice would be correct”

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E


The IDL Group and Constance McCorkle2

Unfortunately, this is not easy to guarantee in the condi-tions under which many poor livestock keepers operate.However, recent evidence suggests that CAHWs actuallyimprove use of veterinary drugs. For example, studies inMozambique and Ghana (Oakley et al., 2002) reveal thatfarmers use antimicrobials routinely but with no knowledgeof which to use, at what dose rate or for how long. Notuncommonly they are also using black-market medicines ofdubious quality. In the absence of a CAHW, most farmerswould cite the local drug seller, as being their main sourceof advice but in most cases that advice would be wrong.When there is a CAHW, over 70% of livestock keeperswould rank them as their preferred source of animal healthadvice. And in the vast majority of cases, their advice wouldbe correct.

Interestingly, despite their greater knowledge, veterinar-ians did not rank highly as sources of advice, as again, theywere simply too far away. It is therefore hard to see whatcontribution veterinarians could make to patterns of medi-cines usage.

The evidence is, however, that CAHWs do reduce the

hazards of drug administration, by:• directly improving standards of administration;• increasing prophylactic use/improving overall herd health,

and therefore indirectly reducing the number of animalsneeding antimicrobial therapy.

This is not to say that incorrect drug administration doesnot occur when CAHWs are around. Both drug administra-tion by CAHWs and veterinarians were found to be lacking,as both were hamstrung by farmer reluctance to pay for full-dose therapy. But from a policy angle it does suggest thatcontrary to the original assumption, CAHWs can be a largepart of the solution rather than being a large part of theproblem.

When there is no alternative, people use whatever isaround. The herder seen in the photo above is trying to treata cow with pneumonia and his diagnosis is correct. However,he is untrained and has prepared a solution from oxytetracy-cline capsules designed for oral administration to humans.He has wasted his money as the treatment is unlikely to work.CAHWs are probably the only way to improve quality ofservces in these situations.

When there is noalternative, peopleuse whatever isaround. CAHWs areprobably the onlyway to improvequality of service inthese situations.

SPECIAL ISSU

E


Community-based animal healthcare, participation, and policy: where are we now? 2

3.The international community will say we have a second-rate veterinary service if we legalise these CAHWsIn an era of globalisation, developing countries are thinkingmore about export of animals and animal products withinthe framework of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Inthe animal health world, the Office Internationale desEpizooties (OIE) in Paris develops guidelines to ensure thattraded livestock commodities are disease-free. The guidelinesare largely based on the capacity of national veterinary serv-ices and systems of livestock production in the North. Theyrequire countries to demonstrate understanding of thedisease situation throughout their territory and provide veri-fiable evidence of disease status. Opponents of CAHWs claimthat such understanding can only arise from professionalassessment at all levels, but overlook the funding and logis-tical practicalities of placing sufficient numbers of vets in thefield to collect disease information.

A more pragmatic approach links CAHWs with nationalanimal health surveillance systems and combines CAHW-derived information with some professional supervision andverification. At present, the OIE has no concerns with CAHWs

provided they are well-trained, supervised and are integratedinto national veterinary services. This is a logical way tostrengthen capacity of national disease information systems.

4. We already have thousands of retrenched but well-trained government animal health professionals andtechnicians. Why can’t these people provide the service?In some countries, structural adjustment resulted in dramaticdownsizing of veterinary staff employed by government. Theargument goes that CAHWs should not be promotedbecause there are large numbers of trained but unemployed,former government veterinary workers such as Animal HealthAssistants (AHAs) and Animal Health Technicians (AHTs) whocan provide services. This argument breaks down for at leastthree reasons.• CAHWs are usually part-time workers who also make a

living from rearing livestock. Their expectations with regardsto financial incentives are usually low compared with AHAsor AHTs, particularly in a private sector market.

• CAHWs live within their communities. In pastoral areas,they move when herds move and therefore, can provide animmediate service. This differs from a sedentary, urban-based AHA or AHT who, in the case of disease problems,has to be located and then transported to the community.

• Perhaps for the above reasons, when given a chance toselect someone for training communities rarely select (oreven mention) unemployed AHAs or AHTs.

5. This is just another donor-driven approach like structuraladjustment. We’re fed up with donors telling us what todo. All these people conducting studies on CAHWs havebeen bought off by donorsVets who are influential in national policy making arenassometimes resort to this argument when all else fails. Theargument usually includes strong criticism of donor-enforcedstructural adjustment programmes that apparently, led to thedecline of state veterinary services and loss of jobs. Occa-sionally the argument extends to colleagues and peers whohave been persuaded by donors to support CAHWs. Implicitis the notion that at some time in the past, there was agolden age of public sector, universal veterinary service provi-sion that reached all corners, communities and sick livestock.The outstanding feature of debate on these points is theabsence of alternatives to CAHWs, given the profoundresource and logistical constraints. Evidence of the positiveimpact of CAHWs, arising from different sources andmethodologies is rejected out of hand, because researcherswere ‘in the pocket’ of donors. This evidence includes:• Aggregating review findings from CAHW programmes in

Well-regardedveterinary journalsnow publish‘scientific’ papersdescribing localdisease descriptionsand epidemiology,as captured byparticipatoryinquiry

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E


The IDL Group and Constance McCorkle2

Tanzania, the Philippines, and Kenya, we found that fami-lies without access to community animal health (CAH) lostbetween 15-25% of their herd each year. The presence ofa CAHW more or less halved these losses.

• Data from elsewhere has found that patient recovery rateswere 70% in communities with CAHWs, but only 10% inthose without community-based paraprofessionals.

• We also know that CAHWs are a low cost option. Estimatesfor training and establishing programmes vary between$200 and $500 per CAHW, with benefits over a 10-yearperiod being estimated at between 40 and 200 times theinitial investment.

But clinical services are only part of the picture. By alsoconsidering the government (rather than the smallholder) tobe the client, CAHWs have demonstrated their ability todeliver government programmes on a contract basis. Vacci-nation, for instance, can be delivered more effectively thangovernment structures were ever capable of doing.

ConclusionsWe now see that over a period of some 30 years, the desireof communities to have access to basic, affordable animalhealth care has remained undiminished, as have theeconomic and institutional forces that have led to thedemand being met through CAHWs.

What has changed is the forum for the debate, as thetopical issues have moved from technical and institutionalissues at the community level, through (often) confrontationwith the veterinary establishment and government, to a

growing recognition both nationally and internationally of itspotential in delivering on parallel policy objectives. It is issuesof regulation, defining the relationship between CAHWsystems and the larger animal health network that will mostlikely determine the pace of change for the foreseeable future.

CAHWs are now legal in several countries. In others,perversely, their illegal status undermines the ability ofgovernments to regulate CAHWs or make full use of theirservices, while denying stockholder and CAHWs alike theprotection of the law.

We are now in a dynamic but uncertain situation whereinstitutions and policy lag behind the technical and economicreality of CAHW systems. Institutional and policy reform takesa good deal of effort. For many countries, the next step istherefore to decide whether or not they really want it.

ABOUT THE AUTHORSConstance McCorkle7767 Trevino Lane, Falls Church, VA 22043,USA.Email: [email protected]

The IDL GroupPO Box 20, Crewkerne, Somerset TA18 7YW,United Kingdom.Email: [email protected]

NOTEConstance McCorkle holds an MA and a PhDin anthropology plus an MA in linguistics, allfrom Stanford University. She has lived,studied, lectured or conducted research in 45nations of Africa, Asia, Europe, and LatinAmerica. Since 1980, she has researched andpublished widely on livestock, communityanimal health and ethnoveterinary medicine.

The IDL group, chiefly through their subsidiaryLivestock in Development, works with govern-ments and development organisations in Asia,Africa, the Middle East and Latin America onthe economic analysis, reform and strengthen-ing of veterinary services.

REFERENCE AND FURTHER READINGThis paper is drawn from the forthcomingbook Community-based Animal HealthWorkers: Threat or Opportunity? by the IDLGroup and due for publication in late 2002.The reference cited by Peter Oakley andcolleagues comprises a chapter in the book.

When there are noroads to reachcommunities in remoteareas, it makes senseto use CAHWs assources of informationon livestock disease.National animal healthinformation systemscan be strengthened

SPECIAL ISSU

E


and the Directorate General for Livestock Production (DGLP),so that any successful models could be replicated throughoutIndonesia.

When the project started in 1996, towards the end of theSuharto era, government services were highly centralised,bureaucratic and inefficient, although policies promotingdecentralisation, privatisation and participation had been inplace for a number of years. All budgets, services,programmes, and projects continued to be designed andcontrolled from the capital, Jakarta, and regional and districtstaff simply followed orders. During the first two years,

Introduction This paper describes a pilot project introducing community-based animal health worker (CAHW) services in Indonesia,focusing on the implementation process, institutional changeand impact. It also describes how the CAHWs has changedthe perception of all stakeholders about the provision of serv-ices in rural areas. The pilot project was one component of afive-year UK Department for International Development(DFID) funded project called The Decentralised LivestockServices in Eastern Indonesia (DELIVERI).

BackgroundThe DELIVERI project’s aim was to help the Government ofIndonesia to reform livestock services. The project’s specificpurpose was to make livestock-related institutions moreresponsive to the need of small-scale farmers, including theresource-poor, through the adoption and replication of moreclient-orientated and participatory approaches.

To do this, the project developed and tested new modelsof livestock service provision in four districts in North andSouth Sulawesi. The project also included human resourcedevelopment, institutional development and informationactivities at district, provincial, and national level to ensurethat the lessons learnt were institutionalised within DistrictLivestock Services (DLS), Provincial Livestock Services (PLS),

by COKRO S. LEKSMONO and JOHN YOUNG

Community-based animalhealth workers andinstitutional change: theDELIVERI Project in Indonesia

3

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E


Cokro S. Leksmono and John Young3

although farmers and field-level staff were enthusiastic aboutthe project’s new approaches at field level, and a few enlight-ened senior managers recognised their value, the project hadlittle impact on policy or processes within the bureaucracy.Then the economic, social and political crisis in 1997/8pushed Suharto out of office and the new era of Reformasiforced ill prepared government departments to implementrapidly the long-shelved policies of decentralisation, privati-sation, and participation. By that time, the project had anumber of successful pilot projects up and running, andsome charismatic champions among livestock service staff atall levels, and suddenly found itself in high demand.

The CAHW pilot projects proved particularly popular withgovernment staff and farmers, and over the last two years ofthe project a total of 161 CAHWs were trained and estab-lished in six locations throughout the country. Five provincesin the island of Sumatera have been trying to replicate theCAHWs model in 12 districts.

ApproachThe pilot project begun with a Participatory Rural Appraisal(PRA) exercise in each project location during which animaldisease and poor accessibility to veterinary services was iden-tified as one of the most important problems. Further discus-sions with communities and other stakeholders identified theCAHW approach as the best method to overcome theproblem.

Each community nominated a representative to betrained as a CAHW by the project, and afterwards theyreturned to their community to provide basic clinical animalhealth services for a fee. They were also given a soft loan tobuy basic veterinary tools and drugs and were given an annu-ally renewable certificate by the local District LivestockServices (DLS) allowing them to provide services. Monthlymeetings were held to provide some continuing education,and to exchange experiences and information between theCAHWs and the DLS. In the year 2000, the CAHWs set up anassociation to represent their interests.

Institutional impactA greater role for communitiesThe implementation of CAHWs in the pilot project areascompletely changed the delivery of basic clinical animalhealth services (Table 1). Local communities who used to relyon the free but intermittent and poor quality governmentservice, welcomed the opportunity to take control of theservice themselves. They were actively involved in the plan-ning, implementation, and evaluation of the service and werewilling to pay for the service provided to them by members

of their own community. The CAHWs were also highly moti-vated to provide a high quality service to their clients, andthere was a significant increase in customer satisfaction withanimal health services and an ever-increasing trend in thenumber of cases treated by each CAHW per month.

A decreasing hands-on role for governmentThe government role in the provision of basic clinical animalhealth services decreased dramatically and they graduallydelegated increasing authority to the CAHWs, while contin-

Training community-basedanimal health workers inthe DELIVERI Project: thetraining course wasparticipatory and usedpictures to initiatediscussions aboutparticular problems

This picture is about antibiotic resistance. The text says ‘twenty yearsago Mr Bill, the farmer, treated his cow with penicillin. It was cheapand effective. Ten years ago penicillin was no longer effective and MrBill had to use a more expensive medicine called Baytril. But now evenBaytril doesn’t work, and Mr Bill has to find another, even moreexpensive drug’

SPECIAL ISSU

E


Community-based animal health workers and institutional change: the DELIVERI Project in Indonesia 3

uing to monitor the CAHW activities and standard of service.The transition proved difficult for some DLS staff who feltthreatened by their new role, or lacked the initiative andcreativity to develop it. Gradually however, even some public-good services including mass vaccination, were sub-contracted to the CAHWs.

The change provided a powerful impetus for more strate-gic thinking by livestock service managers and decisionmakers at various levels in the bureaucracy to seek new waysof providing better services to local communities and to makethe community more self-reliant. As they became more famil-iar with the principles of client-focused services, they beganto try to apply them to other services. There has been adramatic improvement in communication and exchange ofinformation between livestock service staff and their clients.

The CAHWs also found themselves under pressure toimprove the quality of their service, from clients who, sincethey were paying for the service, felt they had a right to makedemands on the CAHW – something that they never felt theycould do with the government service.

Economic impactAccessibility to basic veterinary services has increased

substantially. Livestock owners living in rural and marginalareas who used to have a limited access to basic veterinaryservices can now access basic services any time. This has ledto a significant increase in cattle population. Following theeconomic crisis in Indonesia, the Indonesian Rupiah (IDR) lostover 70% of its value in less than one year, and people,looking for alternative ways to save their money, wereencouraged to invest in livestock since they felt that the avail-ability of improved services through the CAHWs reduced therisk of loss from disease.

Most of the CAHWs have been able to make a profit outof their job within three to four months providing a big incen-tive for them to stay in the job, and ensuring the sustainabil-ity of the service.

Efficiency in treating animal disease improved substan-tially. In 1998 the cost to the government of treating one casewas between IDR 111,000 to 212,000. In 2000, the CAHWswere providing the same service for only IDR 5,000 to35,000. The implementation of CAHWs significantly reducedgovernment spending. A calculation of net benefit-cost in2000 showed a net present value of IDR. 88.96 million(discount rate 15%), proving that the cost to the Departmentof Livestock Services of establishing CAHWs is cheaper than

Before the introduction of CAHWs

Planning, implementation, accountability & reaching poor farmers

Planning done by the government with almost no consultation with thelivestock owners. Policies tended to be implemented uniformly across thecountry with no consideration of locally specific needs, conditions oraspirations.

DLS responsible for the delivery of livestock services. Service provided freeof charge (including private goods like basic clinical animal healthservice). Local staff accountable to the head of districts.

Some consensus that DLS projects were targeted to poorer livestockfarmers but usually ended up servicing richer farmers.

The service was planned from the perspective of the bureaucracy. It wassupply-driven and often below the expectations of the main benefactor ofthe service – the livestock owners.

Key actors and decision-making

Head of local DLS made all major decisions, the rest (including livestockowners) had little influence on key issues.

Decision-making followed central policy or made local decisions with littleclient consultation and then took a passive approach to ‘marketing’ andservice delivery. No public pressures were able to shape these decisions i.e.no popular participation in decision-making and no DLS accountability tocustomers.

Table 1After the introduction of CAHWs

Planning of CAHWs done with the community. CAHWs are representa-tive of the community and all animal disease prevention and treatmentis done through or involving the CAHW.

CAHWs responsible for delivering basic clinical animal health services.Government already sub-contracted them to do some public-goodservice (e.g. mass vaccination). Competition introduced to encouragethem to give their best service.

Service accessible to all community members, regardless of wealth.CAHW provides animal health service with correct qualification, costand quality to the rural communities which are relatively poor comparedto urban areas.

The service was demand-driven and planned from the perspective of theclients. Because they pay for the service, it gives them the right tocomplain if the service is below standard.

As the communities are becoming more self-reliant and the CAHWs aremore confident in doing their job, they gradually are assuming thedecision-making activities regarding their livestock. The head of DLS isstill a key actor in maintaining the standard of service.

The whole CAHW issue has encouraged more strategic thinking by thedecision makers and DLS staff about how to satisfy livestock animalhealth demands; encouraging a wider, longer term vision of needs andplanned action to meet them. Planning and thinking ahead is morerealistic.

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E


Cokro S. Leksmono and John Young3

continuing to provide the service themselves.The DELIVERI CAHWs also contributed to poverty allevi-

ation. The DELIVERI socio-economic impact report showed asignificant redistribution of income from 1997 to 2000 in thedistrict of Barru and Bulukumba (South Sulawesi). While theproportion of respondents in the ‘medium’ wealth rankingcategory in each district remained constant in 1997 and2000, both saw an increase in the proportion of respondentsfalling into the ‘rich’ category, as well as a reduction in theproportion falling into the ‘poor’ category.

ConclusionsThe DELIVERI CAHW project shows that:• privatisation of basic clinical animal health services is consis-

tent with the goals of the service and can substantiallyimprove accessibility, quality, and cost of the service;

• involvement of local communities in planning and imple-mentation of animal health service can increase the self-reliance and decision-making capacity of individual livestock

owner; and,• CAHWs have a comparative advantage to other animal

health service providers in terms of transaction cost, qualifi-cation and remuneration. They are suitable for the rural poor.

The critical factors for a successful implementation of theCAHW approach are:• enthusiasm and active involvement of local communities is

vital to the sustainability of the service;• participatory processes that were built in with the DELIVERI

project approach have been able to attract genuine inter-est and involvement of various parties in the programme;

• a favourable policy context that enables local communities’enthusiasm to flourish and provides continuous supportwhenever needed; and,

• close linkages with decision makers and managers createcommon understanding and experience-sharing with allparties involved in the implementation of the pilot projectand enable the replication of the CAHW approach else-where in Indonesia.

ABOUT THE AUTHORSCokro S. LeksmonoOverseas Development Institute111 Westminster Bridge, London SE1 7JD,United Kingdom.Email: [email protected]

John YoungOverseas Development Institute111 Westminster Bridge, London SE1 7JD,United Kingdom.Email: [email protected]

NOTESCokro S. Leksmono was the livestock adviseron the DELIVERI Project. He has just completeda PhD on community-based animal healthworkers at the University of Reading, UK andnow works as a Research Officer at the Over-seas Development Institute in London.

John Young worked on community-basedanimal health care projects in Kenya for tenyears before moving to Indonesia to managethe DELIVERI project. He is now a ResearchFellow at the Overseas Development Institutein London, UK.

Information presented in this article is drawnfrom a number of papers and articlesproduced by DELIVERI, including work byAlwyn Chilver, Barbara Kirby, Agus Nata-sukarya, Michelle Phillips, and Dil Peeling.More detailed information is available atwww.deliveri.org

Before the introduction of CAHWs

Accessibility to animal health services

One animal health post in Minahasa district, North Sulawesi served 32sub-districts and 502 villages.

One animal health post in Barru district, South Sulawesi served five sub-districts and 71 villages.

Livestock owners travelled relatively long distances to make a request and> 40% of request require > than three days for a response; 15% ofrequests never received a response.

Quality of animal health services

Each government animal health service provider treated 12, 24 and 21cases in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively, per month.

Only 16% of clients rated animal health service as good or very good.

Cost of animal health services

The cost of treating per animal disease case by the DLS was fromIndonesian Rupiah (IDR) 111,000 to 212,000.

Total DLS budget for the provision of animal health service was aroundIDR 65.75 million for each DLS.

Table 2: Selected quality of service and economic indicators for DELIVERIAfter the introduction of CAHWs

53 CAHWs trained in Minahasa in 1997.

17 CAHWs trained in Barru in 1998.

Average time to make a report is 17 minutes; 75% of responses within30 minutes, 21% takes between 30 to 60 minutes, and 4% takes morethan 1 hour.

Each CAHW treats 115, 183 and 104 cases in 1998, 1999 and 2000,respectively, per month.

78% of clients rate animal health services as good or very good.

The cost of treating per animal disease case by the CAHW is from IDR5,000 to 35,000 (Leksmono, 2002).

The cost of establishing CAHW services is IDR 8.26 million in eachdistrict.

SPECIAL ISSU

E


IntroductionSimanjiro district, northern Tanzania is a semi-arid area thatis mainly occupied by Maasai communities. These commu-nities are pastoralists, meaning that they derive their liveli-hood from their mixed herds of cattle, sheep, goats, anddonkeys. In September 1997 the NGO VetAid established acommunity-based animal health programme in Simanjiro.This paper describes a participatory impact assessment thatwas conducted by VetAid in May 2001.

The aim of the impact assessment was to:• enable livestock keepers to describe the positive and nega-tive impacts of the project on their livelihoods;• identify indicators and a framework for monitoring futureimpact.

When the project was started in 1997, community-basedanimal health workers (CAHWs) were trained to treat orprevent commonly occurring diseases which are perceivedto be a potential threat1. The impact assessment was carried

by STEVEN NALITOLELA and ROB ALLPORT

A participatory approach toassessing the impact of acommunity-based animalhealth project with Maasaicommunities in Tanzania

4

1. These diseases were East Coast Fever (ECF) and other tick borne diseases, Footand Mouth Disease, anthrax, blackquarter, trypanosomiasis, mange, malignantcatarrhal fever, rinderpest, contagious bovine pleuropneumonia, contagiouscaprine pleuropneumonia, helminthoses, footrot, scours, and haemorrhagicsepticaemia. For ECF, treatment with Parvexon and Butalex, prevention bydipping, and immunisation were taught. Due to the low uptake of the methodstaught however, the project vet, CAHWs, and herders successfully tested andintroduced the use of oxytetracycline 30% for calf treatments.

Figure 1: Sketch map of Simanjiro District, northern Tanzania

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E


Steven Nalitolela and Rob Allport4

out in May 2001 in Ngage, Loiborsoit B, and Ruvu Remitvillages.

MethodologyWe focused on the following issues and questions:

1. How do people describe changes that have occurredin the community since the start of the project e.g. how haslivestock mortality and morbidity changed since the CAHWsstarted to work?

To answer these questions we used semi-structured

interviews (SSI) to understand local perceptions of benefitsderived from the project. We then used proportional pilingto compare these benefits at two points in time – before theproject (pre-1998) and after (post-April 2001).

2. Do people relate these changes to project activities, ifat all? e.g. how has the work of the CAHWs affected live-stock mortality and morbidity?

Again, we used SSI to identify factors that hadcontributed to these changes. These factors might be projectactivities or inputs such as the work of CAHWs, the veteri-

Community-based animalhealth workers inaction in Maasaicommunities,Tanzania

SPECIAL ISSU

E


A participatory approach to assessing the impact of a community-based animal health project with Maasai communities in Tanzania 4

nary drug supply system, professional veterinary supervision,and community participation. Alternatively, factors could beidentified that had nothing to do with the project (e.g. rain-fall and good grazing). We used simple ranking to rank thesefactors in order of importance.

3. If and how do changes resulting from the projectimpact on people’s livelihoods? e.g. if our project hasreduced livestock disease, how has this change affected thelives of the people in the project area?

We used ranking to show the relative importance ofmajor foodstuffs used by respective communities, and theorder of socio-economic benefits as perceived by communi-ties. We also compared indicators such as numbers ofmilking cows to pre-project baseline data.

ResultsWhat were the main indicators of change? Semi-structured interview of groups revealed the benefitsmentioned below. The groups were split by gender. Bene-fits perceived by men included:• decrease in calf mortality due to ECF• knowledge on the treatment of mange• improved animal husbandry• reduced abortion rate (one village only)• presence of CAHWs, although they are not enough• improved availability of veterinary drugs.

Benefits perceived by women included:• increased milk availability• increased time for other activities as less time is spent

feeding, drenching, and collecting green grass for sickanimals.

The next stage involved the use of proportional pilingto compare the situation prior to and after the start of theproject. Parameters used for comparison were milk avail-ability, disease prevalence, and abortion rate. Abortion ratewas mentioned as a benefit in only one village. We there-fore studied it in that particular village alone. The commu-nity did not mention adult mortality decrease as a benefit,but since we were interested in it, we asked the groups toshow the situation before and after the project. We usedcattle parameters rather than all type of livestock firstlybecause many of the benefits mentioned are concernedwith cattle. Additionally, cattle are the most important live-stock in these communities, which is probably why peoplekept referring to cattle. Thirdly, we had a view that sincewe are assessing impact, rather than taking every aspect ofoutcomes, we should use only the most important param-eters, importance here being determined by communities.

Proportional piling results are as follows:

Cattle mortalityResults from ‘before and after’ proportional piling ofdiseases causing cattle deaths are shown in Figure 2. Thisdiagram was created by summing calf and adult cattledeaths by disease in each village, and recognition that trendswere similar in each village.

The overall picture was that cattle deaths reducedsubstantially during the project, particularly due to EastCoast Fever (ECF). However, a new disease called ormilo hadappeared and become the most important cause of death.Deaths due to ECF were reduced mainly by treating calvesshowing signs of ECF with oxytetracycline 30%. CAHWs,under veterinary supervision and monitoring, performedtreatments, taught herders how to treat, and provided fieldsupply of drugs.

Increased milk availabilityIncreased milk availability was mentioned as one of the mostimportant household benefits perceived by women. Theywere asked to compare milk production before the projectand after in terms of quantity of milk available (Figure 3).

The number of stones used in Ruvu was only 22 as thewomen had difficulty in understanding the concept of pilingstones to represent milk. When it was suggested that each

Figure 2: ‘Before and after’ cattle deaths by health problem

Notes:The ‘other’ causes of mortality in calves mentioned included:• in Ngage, diarrhoea, worms, and poor nutrition;• in Loiborsoit B, diarrhoea, worms, anaplasmosis, poor nutrition, and

ingestion of plastic bags; and,• in Ruvu Remit, diarrhoea, poor nutrition, worms, and babesiosis.

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E



ities and perceived benefits. The contributing factors werethen ranked in order of importance.

Relating benefits to livelihoodsConsidering the benefits described by the community interms of reduced cattle deaths and more milk, people wereasked how these benefits had affected their livelihoods. Find-ings are summarised in Table 2.

As milk availability seemed to be such an important indi-cator for the project, we looked more closely at the role ofmilk in the diet. We asked people to rank the foods makingup their staple diet in order of importance. They were thenasked to explain how dry years or times of high disease inci-dence affected their diet.

In all cases milk was identified as the first food to disap-

stone represented one calabash they decided that 100calabashes of milk was too much. The actual figures in Ruvuwere one calabash before the project and 21 calabashesafter. These figures have been rounded to percentages inFigure 3 to enable comparison with the other two villages.Although cattle deaths due to ormilo have increased, theincreased calf survival is still large to offset increased cattlelosses and still remain with a large herd that increases milkproduction significantly.

Project benefitsThrough semi-structured interviews, communities were askedto mention factors, which contributed to the project benefits(Table 1). The purpose of this exercise was to obtain commu-nity perception on the linkages, if any, between project activ-

Rank Ngage Loiborsoit Ruvu Remit1st Increased milk

availabilityIncreased milkavailability

Increased milkavailability

2nd Milk available forsale as previouslythis was not possible

Improved humanhealth due to abilityto foot health bills

Increased incomefrom the sale ofcattle has allowedan increase incultivation

3rd Ghee available forchildren

Increased income Increased ability toprovide schooling forchildren

4th Increase in livestockpopulation

Improved ability toeducate children

Increased ability tobuild good houses

5th Increase in livestocktrade and income

Improved quality andcleanliness ofclothing

Improved humanhealth

6th * Increased ability topay school fees andcontribute incommunitydevelopmentprojects

Increased area undercrop cultivation

7th Good meat availablefor traditional meateating camps, locallyknown as orpul

Increased ability tobuild better housing

8th Improved humanhealth

Availability of goodquality meatimproved

9th A sense of well-being resulting fromhaving a larger herd

Table 2: How had the project affected people’s livelihoods?Figure 3. Comparative increase in milk availability beforeand after the project

* The attendance at community development sessions e.g. buildingclassrooms has increased as there is always a goat slaughtered at the endof the day. Larger herds have increased the ability of people to donategoats for development work.

Rank Ngage Loiborsoit Ruvu Remit1st Provision of drugs Community

participationCommunityparticipation

2nd CAHW activities CAHW activities Communitysensitisation andtraining

3rd Presence ofsupportingveterinarian

Availability of drugs CAHW activities

4th Good training givento CAHWs

Close-operationbetween communityand veterinarian

CAHWs havingbicycles

5th Knowledge of theimportance ofveterinary drugs

Knowledge of theimportance of animalhealth

6th CAHWs havingtransport

Fair price forveterinary medicines

7th Communityparticipation

CAHWs havingbicycles

8th Encouragement fromvisitors, both nationaland international

Table 1: Factors contributing towards project benefits

SPECIAL ISSU

E


A participatory approach to assessing the impact of a community-based animal health project with Maasai communities in Tanzania 4

pear in times of stress, followed by meat and then maizemeal. Having a diet with plenty of milk was suggested as anindicator of high food security, whereas diets with moremaize and little or no milk indicate hard times. At the time ofthe assessment, milk constituted a large proportion of thediet in all communities and so they considered themselves tobe food secure.

Comparing current situation of milk availability to establishedbaseline-using indicators identified by communitiesUsing ‘number of milking cows’ as an indicator for house-hold milk availability we continued the impact assessmentconducting semi-structured interviews with 19 households. Ahousehold constituted a man, his wife or wives, children, andhis other dependants. The results were compared to a surveyof 121 households conducted in Simanjiro District seven yearsearlier (Muir, 1994) as shown in Tables 4 and 5.

Future monitoring would involve periodic follow up ofthese herders to determine increase in milking cows in thehousehold.

Lessons learned Livelihood indicators for the futureThe assessment proved to be useful for identifying indicatorsfor future impact monitoring and assessment. For example,many of the livelihood benefits listed in Table 2 can be usedto assess future work. These benefits encompass aspects ofhuman health and nutrition, education, housing, trade, andsocial change. Therefore, the participatory approach clearlyshowed how improvements in animal health are linked to awide range of benefits in pastoralist communities.

Improving the projectsCommunities in the three villages discussed project weak-nesses and suggested future directions. Non-involvement indip rehabilitation was mentioned as the most importantweakness that needed to be corrected. Pastoralists in villagecommunities are the main beneficiaries of the animal healthservices. Conducting a participatory impact assessment gavethem a systematic means of explaining the benefits accruedfrom the project. It is important for sustainability that theysee the project as something beneficial to them. Impactassessment described here used simple participatorymethodologies to obtain community perceptions andimprove local ownership.

Responding to new disease problemsThe impact assessment showed how a previously unknowndisease, called ormilo, had become a very serious problem.

Veterinarians had not been able to confirm the diagnosis ofthe disease and so a research project was initiated with thenational integrated tick and tick borne diseases controlproject coming in to investigate the problem. CAHWsassisted the research. They collected specimens such as bloodand gland smears, and brain squashes, and they recordedmorbidity and mortality in follow up herds in betweenresearcher visits. They also treated cases in accordance toinstructions given by researchers.

Important aspects to consider while applying PRAmethods • Language: when using participatory methods, people

must understand clearly what is expected of them. Theyshould also be able to discuss and express themselves. In

Rank Ngage Loiborsoit Ruvu Remit1st Milk Milk Milk2nd Meat Maize meal Meat3rd Maize meal Meat Maize 4th – – Fat/oils

Table 3: The most important foods

Number of cowsmilked

Proportion of cattleowners in 1994 (%)

(n=121)

Proportion of cattleowners in 2001(%)

(n=19)0 28 01 8 02 13 03 11 04 11 05 13 0

6-10 9 21>10 13 79

Table 4. Comparison of number of milking cows between1994 and 2001

Indicator 1994(n=121)

2001(n=19)

Proportion of households milking at least one cow (%) 72 100Average number of cows milked per household 5 24Median number of cows milked per household 30 115Mean yield per milking (litres) 0.56 0.76

Table 5. Comparison of milk-related indicators

Notes for Tables 4 and 5:Although the 1994 and 2001 figures are all derived from SimanjiroDistrict, the 1994 baseline was conducted in four villages and only one ofthese villages, Loiborsoit, was included in the impact assessment. As thereis also a marked difference in sample sizes (121 and 19), the comparisonis indicative only.

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E



this work the people were Maasai pastoralists. Althoughthey understood some Swahili (the national language),they spoke mostly the Maa language. For effectivecommunication Maa language was used. The main facili-tator used Swahili, which was translated into Maa by a co-facilitator who was fluent in Maa, Swahili, and English.During translation from local language to Swahili (orEnglish) there is a possibility that the local translator willgive his or her interpretation of what community membershave said rather than what they have actually said. Anunderstanding of local language even at rudimentary levelis useful to check such a trend.

• Role of women: in pastoral areas, women have specificroles as far as livestock is concerned. Some project bene-fits, such as those related to milk production and calfdiseases, could be observed by women better than men.

Therefore, women were given the chance to have separatediscussions on project impact.

• Culture: issues discussed should not be culturally offensiveto the beneficiaries. As such, the checklist for SSI wasdeveloped jointly with the Maa co-facilitator in order toensure no culturally offensive topics were included.

• Community description of diseases: as far as animal healthis concerned, pastoralists possess a rich body of knowl-edge. It is termed indigenous veterinary knowledge. Theydescribe various diseases in local terms, using locallanguage. Impact assessment involves the comparison ofanimal health situation before and after the project. Weencouraged community members to describe and namediseases in local terminology. Community description ofdiseases is therefore essential in order to obtain a reliabledisease situation trend.

ABOUT THE AUTHORSSteven NalitolelaVetAid, PO Box 15249, Arusha, Tanzania.Email: [email protected] AllportVetAid, PO Box 15249, Arusha, Tanzania.Email: [email protected]

NOTESSteven Nalitolela is a veterinarian working withVetAid in Simanjiro district Tanzania. He hasworked in participatory animal health as wellas using an holistic approach to pastoralistvillage development. He has 16 years work

experience, with five years working atcommunity level with Maasai pastoralists.Rob Allport has been the Country ProgrammeCoordinator for VetAid in Tanzania sinceOctober 2000. He has experience inethnoveterinary knowledge research acquiredprior to becoming coordinator.

FURTHER READINGA more detailed account of this work isavailable from the authors.Catley, A. 1999. Monitoring and ImpactAssessment of Community-based AnimalHealth Projects in Southern Sudan: Towards

participatory approaches and methods. Areport for Vétérinaires sans frontières Belgiumand Vétérinaires sans frontières Switzerland.Vetwork UK, Musselburgh.Muir, A. 1994. A Situational Analysis ofPastoralism in Simanjiro District, Tanzania.VetAid, Midlothian, UK.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe impact assessment work described herewas funded by the Scottish CatholicInternational Aid Fund (SCIAF), Scotland. Thephotographs were provided by VetAidTanzania.

SPECIAL ISSU

E


tically valid data in the areas where CAHWs tend to operate:• by definition, these areas are remote and little baseline data

is available to guide randomised survey design;• the implementation of conventional surveys is logistically

difficult, particularly in pastoralist areas where communi-ties are widely dispersed and moving;

• survey tools like questionnaires easily miss key perceptionsand opinions of local people, by asking the wrong ques-tions.

In addition to these well-known problems, policy makersmay dismiss even scientifically rigorous assessments if theyfeel isolated from the process or if work is conducted bypeople they don’t know and trust.

The Ethiopian contextEthiopia is characterised by a huge livestock population andrural communities who depend highly on animals for food,income, draught power and social interaction. In thelowlands, pastoralists can keep mixed herds of camels,cattle, sheep, goats, and donkeys. In the highlands, settledfarming communities are also reliant on animals, particu-larly oxen for ploughing, donkeys for transport, and varioususes of other animals. In both highlands and lowlands, theterrain is harsh, distances are long and infrastructure ispoorly developed.

IntroductionThis paper describes how a national-level Participatory ImpactAssessment Team (PIAT) was set up in Ethiopia to informpolicy on the requirements for effective Community AnimalHealth Worker (CAHW) projects. There are two parts to thepaper. First, we describe how the PIAT was set up, its termsof reference and how training was provided in participatoryimpact assessment. We then summarise two impact assess-ments in the field, which were the first attempts by the PIATto use participatory approaches and methods.

There is an increasing body of evidence from participa-tory impact assessment to show how community-basedanimal health workers (CAHWs) have a positive impact onlivestock-rearing communities (e.g. Catley, 1999; Nalitolelaand Allport, this issue). Improvements in basic animal healthcare provide more milk, meat, and livestock for sale. Moreprotein-rich food means healthier people and extra cash buysclothes and schoolbooks. Despite this, very few countrieshave policies in place to support CAHW systems and lack ofan appropriate ‘policy environment’ threatens the sustain-ability of such systems.

Policy reform can refer to various types of information,collected using different methods. While it is often assumedthat objective, quantitative data is very important there are atleast three constraints facing the collection and use of statis-

by CHARLES HOPKINS and ALISTAIR SHORT

Participatory impactassessment in Ethiopia: linking policy reform to field experiences

5

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E


Charles Hopkins and Alistair Short5

During the last ten years or so, non-governmental organ-isations (NGOs) have developed CAHW projects in Ethiopia,particularly in pastoral areas of the country. Despite this work,policy on CAHWs was poorly defined in Ethiopia andevidence of impact was limited. Veterinary professionalbodies had different views on whether or not to supportCAHWs, and how CAHW programmes should be developed.

Forming and training the PIATIdentifying the key stakeholdersThe Pan African Programme for the Control of Epizootics1

(PACE) assists countries to revise policies to support CAHWs.Within PACE, this work is led by the Community-basedAnimal Health and Participatory Epidemiology (CAPE) Unit.In terms of influencing the veterinary profession and policymakers in Ethiopia, the actors described in Table 1 wereconsidered to be important by CAPE staff.

Nineteen veterinarians2 representing the agencies listedin Table 1 attended the workshop, including vets from eightNGOs3 working directly with communities.

Forming the PIAT in a review and planning workshopThe agencies listed in Table 1 were approached by the CAPEUnit and invited to a two-day review and planning workshop.It was explained that CAPE wished to support a PIAT inEthiopia with a view to using information derived from

impact assessment to inform policy debate. Furthermore,CAPE could assist the new PIAT by supporting:• training in participatory impact assessment;• impact assessment of CAHW projects in the field;• presentation of findings to policy makers.

The letter of invitation to the workshop was followed upby personal visits from CAPE staff to the heads of the FederalGovernment Veterinary Team (FVM) and NAHRC, and theEVA secretariat. During these meetings, the proposed roleand composition of the PIAT was discussed in detail. CAPEsuggested that the people representing these agencies in thePIAT should be people who already had an interest or knowl-edge of participatory approaches, whose job descriptionalready covered issues such as CAHW delivery systems, andwhose seniority within the agency allowed direct feedbackto head of the agency.

ObjectivesThe review and planning workshop was designed to:• introduce participatory approaches to impact assessment;• identify all the key stakeholders who were in a position to

influence policy reform and discuss their roles;• review CAHW systems implemented in Ethiopia and iden-

tify key policy issues;• understand the concept of monitoring and impact assess-

ment of CAHWs;• learn about experiences of participatory impact assess-

ments conducted in other countries; and,• agree the composition of the PIAT and plan a participatory

impact assessment exercise in Ethiopia, including a trainingevent and field assessments.

MethodsThe workshop used various methods for critical analysis andsharing experiences of CAHW projects in Ethiopia. Forexample:

1 A programme of the African Union’s Interafrican Bureau for Animal Resources(AU/IBAR)2 From the Federal Veterinary Services Team, the head of the unit dealing withcommunity-based animal health workers and veterinary privatisation; from theFVM, the coordinator of postgraduate training, who was also the research andpublications officer for the faculty; from the EVA, a vet who was responsible foremergency preparedness and planning in the Ministry of Agriculture; from theNAHRC, a researcher who was already studying community-based deliverysystems.3 The NGOs were Save the Children UK, Save the Children US, Hararghe CatholicSecretariat, Action Contre la Faim, Pastoralists’ Concern Association of Ethiopia,CARE Ethiopia, Action for Research and Development, and the EthiopianPastoralist Research and Development Association.

Name

Federal government veterinary team, including staff from PACE Ethiopia

Ethiopian Veterinary Association (EVA)

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (FVM)

National Animal Health Research Centre (NAHRC)

NGOs

Table 1: Key veterinary agencies influencing policy change in EthiopiaFeatures

Mandated to set national veterinary policy within the Ministry of Agriculture

Professional membership organisation with more than 485 members;influences professional norms and behaviour, and lobbies for policy andlegislative change

Trains most veterinarians in Ethiopia and influences professional norms andbehaviour; conducts research

Conducts research on animal diseases

Close and often long experience of working with communities to run CAHWprojects at field level

SPECIAL ISSU

E


Participatory impact assessment in Ethiopia: linking policy reform to field experiences 5

• stakeholder analysis to determine who was important andinfluential within the CAHW systems;

• SWOT analysis4 for critically examining the effectiveness ofanimal health service delivery by CAHWs;

• group work, in numbers between four and five persons, topermit as wide a range of points of view and experiencesto be shared amongst participants; and

• plenary and brainstorming sessions to summarise progressand keep participants focused.

The workshop was crucial in bringing veterinary profes-sionals in the NGO, state, research, and education sectorstogether to learn, listen, and share experiences. Commonunderstanding was reached on various issues related toCAHW projects, including assessment of the ‘ideal’ and‘actual’ roles of policy makers at the current time (Table 2).

Key strengths and weaknesses of CAHW systems inEthiopia were also identified, such as the non-standardisa-tion of the CAHW system, the duration and content of train-ing, weak institutional linkages, drug source and supply,inadequate supervision of CAHWS, poor reporting, misuseof revolving funds, and also that the system was not yetfinancially sustainable. Added to this was the high drop-outrate of CAHWs. Factors seen as threats were subsidisedveterinary services (by government and NGOs), recurrentdrought, insecurity and conflicts (intra and inter), donor influ-ence and their short term funding horizons, the partialenabling environment, a lack of clear policy, and epidemiclivestock diseases.

With these issues at the forefront of people’s minds, theywere able to describe how impact assessment of CAHWprojects was linked to policy. Key linkages are summarised inBox 1.

At the end of the workshop, the dates and venue for atraining course in participatory impact assessment plus two

sites for field assessment were agreed. Sixteen participantsconfirmed that they were available to form the PIAT, includ-ing vets from the EVA, Federal Veterinary Services Team,NAHRC and seven NGOs.

Training the PIAT in participatory impact assessmentFollowing the review and planning workshop, an eight-daycourse for the 16 participants of the PIAT was run with thefollowing objectives:• to introduce the principles of participatory approaches and

sustainable development;• to understand importance of community entry and the

collection of background information;• to improve understanding and practice of participatory

tools;

4 SWOT – Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats

Ideal role

• Creating enabling environment to endorse and legalise the system;

• Producing training guidelines;

• Standardise the approach toward the CAHW system;

• Implement, supervise, monitor and evaluate the system;

• For the donor to fund the system and accept that the system needslonger funding periods.

Table 2: The ideal and the actual roles played by the important and influential veterinary policy makers in EthiopiaActual role

• No enabling environment was established in some of the regions;

• It was only recently that efforts have made in the area of training guidelinepreparation by the federal MoA;

• Little effort has been made to standardise the CAHW system so far;

• MoA was not permitting some of the basic services to be included in theCAHW training courses (even though the needs assessments clearly indicateda demand for those services);

• Donors have been restricting the implementation to short duration fundingperiods in some cases.

1. Impact of CAHWs to be shown to doubting policy makers andveterinary professionals;

2. Assessments contribute to further harmonisation/standardisationof CAHWs;

3. Better impact assessment results will attract more donor funding;4. Lessons learnt for future CAHW interventions;5. Provide agencies such as IBAR with a greater justification in

promoting CAHW systems;6. Justifies the bottom-up participatory approach used by CAHWs;7. Further enhances the surveillance and control of transboundary

disease;8. Identify weaknesses in the CAHW system and contribute to

practical solutions for the service delivery agents;9. Show the impact of the CAHWs on the veterinary service delivery

system;10. Positive impacts will convince policy makers to support more

enabling environment for CAHWs;11. Skill transfer to the veterinary profession will contribute to

improved assessments in the future and ‘better practice’ in thedesign, planning and implementation of CAHWs.

Box 1: The need for linking project impact to policyreform for the future sustainability of animal healthservices in remote locations

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E



• to understand how participatory assessments contribute tocommunity action;

• to understand the value of participatory teamwork wheninteracting in the community; and,

• to organise the impact assessment field work.The organisation of fieldwork included identification of

two CAHW projects suitable for assessment. These projectswere selected using criteria such as:• areas that have well-established CAHW systems that have

been running for around five years;• ideally, a pastoral area;• local partners who are willing to host the team, work with

them and create awareness with the community before theteam’s arrival.

Using these criteria, a FARM Africa project in Afar regionand a Save the Children UK project in North Wollo wereselected for assessment. It was recognised that the assess-ment of these projects was part of the training process forthe PIAT. The field-level work would be an opportunity topractice new methods while also generating information forpolicy makers.

Using participatory impact assessment with twocommunities in Afar and North WolloThe impact assessments with communities followed onimmediately after the training course for the PIAT. Themethods used are summarised in Table 3.

Some findings In North Wollo the CAHWs were especially successful but dueto policy, their services are limited largely to the treatment ofinternal and external parasites. In Afar their service is limitedas policy prevents them providing treatment for trypanoso-miasis or to use injected antibiotics. In both locations, theregular supply of veterinary drugs remains a problem.

Therefore, some important policy-related issues were:• there is a demand for services and a willingness to pay by

poor, often remote, rural livestock keepers;• with good training and follow up support, CAHWs can be

very competent deliverers of the service;• with a regular supply of veterinary inputs, funds collected

under cost recovery can make the system financially viable;• with a relaxing of governmental control the services of

Type of information required

• Background about the community• Livelihood system• Livestock production system• Livestock production and constraints• Livestock diseasesChanges due to CAHW project• In veterinary services (quality, accessibility, sources)• Morbidity and mortality• Livestock productivity and use of livestock products• Producers’ welfare• Motivation of CAHWs• Community’s general perceptions about the CAHW project

Table 3: Participatory methods used in the impact assessmentPRA tools usedSSI (semi-structured interviews) and mappingSSI, proportional pilingSSI, mobility mappingSSI, proportional piling.SSI, ranking and matrixBefore and after CAHWsSSI, preference rankingLocation MappingSSI, scoring, proportional pilingSSI, scoring, proportional pilingSSI, scoring of income sourcesSSI

Participatoryimpactassessment withcommunities inNorth Wollo

Participatoryimpactassessment withcommunities inAfar

SPECIAL ISSU

E


Participatory impact assessment in Ethiopia: linking policy reform to field experiences 5

CAHWs can be improved to include vaccinations, the useof injected antibiotics, and other services;

• the benefits of improved animal health are only fullycaptured if linked to other initiatives such as conflictmanagement and livestock marketing.

Lessons learntUsing a participatory methodology is a way of linkingcommunities with the more influential professionals or‘outsiders’. The approach involved multiple professionalstakeholders, equipping them with powerful participatorymethods and placing them face-to-face with livestockkeepers. Using these methodologies is a way of bringingthe important and powerful more into contact with therealities in the field by observing, listening, sharing, andlearning from rural communities. It is essential to takeprofessionals out of the office if they are to realise the

achievements and constraints of the CAHW projects to beassessed in remote and often harsh environments such asAfar and North Wollo.

We encouraged a methodology that looked in detail atthe links between animal health and human livelihoods,rather than only measuring changes in the livestock diseasesituation. Therefore, we asked not only ‘How did livestockhealth change?’ but also, ‘What was the impact of thesechanges to people’s food, income or other measures of liveli-hood?’ The approach also provided much scope for assess-ing the affect of external factors on the projects.

After the field assessments in Afar and North Wollo weasked the members of the PIAT to evaluate the process they’dbeen through, covering the initial review workshop, the train-ing course and the impact assessments in the field. The threemost commonly expressed constraints were from the field-work:

Table 4: Impact on the animal health service delivery systems in the two communitiesAfar (Telalak)Before CAHW project• clients travel 55km to access services;• government interventions focus on vaccinations and disease

outbreaks;• use of traditional healers important.

After CAHW project• CAHWs make services more accessible and available;• growing importance of modern veterinary treatments at the

expense of traditional healers;• CAHWs are technically competent and provide 50% of

veterinary services;• there is strong supervision and follow up of the CAHWs.

CAHWs are motivated to provide services due to theirtraditional obligations to clan and community; they lackbusiness management skills and have low cash incentive, butgain from the ‘free’ treatment of their own animals andimproved social status.

The priority is for communities to access milk.

There have been few welfare gains perceived by the localpeople largely to do with outside factors such as:• the poor health of camels (due to increased migration) which

provide milk for children;• reduced cattle milk production as pastures declined, due to

conflict;• this results in the need to purchase powdered milk as Afar

cannot live without milk;• the increased sale of their animals in exchange for grain.The price of livestock is however increasing relative to grain(improved terms of trade).

Serviceindicators

CAHWincomesand welfare

Communitywelfare

North Wollo (Sekota)Before CAHW project• since 1991 Government services responding to outbreaks 75km

away;• since 1995 Government veterinary post in the community;• importance of traditional healers in the past.

After CAHW project• declining importance of traditional healers and increasing

importance of modern veterinary services;• Woreda veterinary post provides antibiotics, diagnostic services,

supervision of CAHWs and drug supply for CAHWs;• CAHWs provide treatments for internal and external parasites in

those more remote locations not accessed by the Governmentveterinary staff.

CAHWs are motivated (with significant additions to their monthlyincome of up to 110 birr per month), they have strongadministrative skills (with excellent record keeping ability) andare technically competent (making their most significant impacton the health of goats through the use of acaricides).

Oxen are especially important because of their draught power forploughing.• oxen draught power for ploughing has increased due to

priority feeding strategy using crop residues and the CAHWtreatment of internal parasites;

• weight gain of animals due to regular deworming servicesprovided by CAHWs;

• increased added value of hides and skins due to thereduction of external parasites attributed again by thecommunity to the service provided by the CAHWs;

• despite a general downward trend in milk yields (due to pastureshortage) the rate of this decline has been reduced due to theCAHW treatment of internal and external parasites.

The impacts of the CAHW services have been most visiblyperceived by the community in the goat population and this hasresulted in increased income earning opportunities from thesale of these small ruminants.

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E



• Not enough time – there was a general feeling within thePIAT that three weeks was insufficient time to conduct twoimpact assessments in the field, and that in future, moretime should be allocated to fieldwork.

• Too much information – this problem was associated witha methodology that on reflection was probably too ambi-tious. The information needs listed in Table 4 were verycomprehensive. A balance has to be reached between thebackground information required on the project area interms of livelihoods, and the specific assessment of the proj-ects in question.

• Difficulties in analysis and presentation – this was partly dueto the large amount of information collected by the team.

They had problems compiling the information into formatssuitable for difference audiences, and within the time avail-able.

The findings from the impact assessments werepresented at the Ethiopian Veterinary Association 16thAnnual Conference in Addis Ababa in June 2002, and werewell received. The PIAT is now developing a work plan torefine the impact assessment methodology and conductfurther assessments of CAHW projects in representativeareas of Ethiopia. A more realistic timeframe will be devel-oped. The intention is to build a national-level picture ofpolicy issues related to improved CAHW projects and involv-ing livestock keepers.

ABOUT THE AUTHORSCharles Hopkinsc/o VSF SwitzerlandPO Box 25656, Nairobi, KenyaEmail: [email protected]

Alistair Shortc/o VSF Switzerland (as above)Email: [email protected]

NOTESCharles Hopkins is a PRA trainer, formerly withSave the Children UK in Liberia but nowworking as an independent consultant. Alistair Short is an agricultural economistqualified from Reading University withexperience working for Vétérinaries sansfrontières in The Gambia, Liberia, southernSudan, and currently in north east Kenya.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSWe’d like to thank the members of theEthiopia PIAT for their hard work and everyoneelse who contributed to this work and our six-week mission to Addis Ababa, Afar, and NorthWollo.

SPECIAL ISSU

E


established to coordinate and promote rinderpest eradica-tion worldwide. The strategy of the programme is timelyeradication in a sustainable and verifiable manner and reliesheavily on strategically focused vaccination and epidemio-logical surveillance. The Food and Agriculture Organizationof the United Nations coordinates the global programme. InAfrica, GREP works in partnership with the African Union’sPan African Programme for the Control of Epizootics (PACE)that has the regional mandate for rinderpest eradication inAfrica.

Only 15 years ago, rinderpest was present throughoutlarge parts of Africa, Asia, and the Middle East. By the early1990s, rinderpest had been eliminated from West Africa withthe help of mass vaccination campaigns. However, areas ofEast Africa still harboured the disease, particularly remote,pastoral areas. The disease persisted here due to the limitedavailability of livestock services and insecurity. For a period ofabout five years progress towards rinderpest eradicationappeared to stall.

This paper will trace the evolution of ideas and reviewsome of the lessons learnt as part of the strategic revision ofthe rinderpest eradication programme. It is a story of progres-sion from top-down institutional design to grass-rootsempowerment where dialogue has mobilised communitiesand professionals to meet both local and international goals.

Rinderpest and human livelihoodsRinderpest is a severe viral disease of cattle and wildlife thatcan cause near total mortality in its epidemic form. Histori-cally, rinderpest was a disease of Europe and Asia, but thedisease was accidentally introduced to eastern Africa at theend of the 19th century by Asian cattle imported to feedcolonial armies. The epidemic spread as far as South Africaover the ensuing decade killing up to 90% of the cattle andsusceptible wildlife in its path. It is estimated that one-thirdof the human population of Ethiopia starved to death in thefamine that resulted. Rinderpest remained in Africa from thattime causing periodic epidemics with severe economic, foodsecurity, and social consequences.

The disease is an important concern in internationaltrade. It was eradicated from Europe in the last century andonly ever occurred once in the Americas. The world veteri-nary authority, the Office International des Epizooties (OIE),was founded as a direct result of a rinderpest outbreak inBelgium and Brazil in 1920, caused by an infected shiploadof cattle originating from Asia. Countries that have rinder-pest infestation experience reduced access to internationalmarkets due to health restrictions on exports.

The Global Rinderpest Eradication Programme (GREP)The Global Rinderpest Eradication Programme (GREP) was

by JEFFREY MARINER, PETER ROEDER and BERHANU ADMASSU

Community participation andthe global eradication ofrinderpest

6

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E


Jeffrey Mariner, Peter Roeder and Berhanu Admassu6

Conventional approaches to rinderpest control anderadicationTechnical issuesIn theory, rinderpest is an easy disease to eradicate. Animalsthat recover are immune for life and the rinderpest virus doesnot survive long outside the body. The virus is transmitted bydirect contact between animals. As a result, the diseasealways needs to find new, susceptible individuals to survive.Vaccination reduces the number of these susceptible animals.

A vaccine developed in the 1960s, called by many thePlowright vaccine, is considered one of the finest animal orhuman vaccines ever developed and has contributed tremen-dously to the control of rinderpest. However, the vaccine hadone important constraint when used in the developing world– it required a strict cold chain from the point of productionin the factory to the cow, in order to keep the vaccine aliveand effective. This meant very costly and logistically compli-cated infrastructure was required to mount controlcampaigns. Refrigeration facilities, ice machines, cold boxesand fleets of vehicles were all essential. As a result, rinder-pest control was difficult to deliver and sustain in the lessdeveloped areas. Consequently, places such as remote andextensive pastoral regions, areas of insecurity, and othermarginalised areas lingered as reservoirs for the disease.

In 1990, Tufts University and the US Department of Agri-culture developed a thermostable rinderpest vaccine (TRV)that utilised the Plowright vaccine virus but improved thepreservation process. The vaccine could be transported in thefield for up to 30 days without refrigeration. The ther-mostable vaccine was originally intended as a technical solu-tion to the problem of rinderpest control in remote,marginalised communities.

The vaccine could now be delivered on foot, by horse,camel or bicycle. It could go to places without roads, elec-

tricity, generators or kerosene. Only the most basic equip-ment was required: a syringe, mixing bottle, needles, goodwater, and salt. Despite all these options, it was difficult forthe veterinary establishment to envisage change. Manyclearly wished to continue with conventional approaches tovaccine delivery based on government teams working fromvehicles, and requiring daily allowances.

Socio-economic issuesAs TRV became available in quantity in early 1992-3, fieldstudies were undertaken to examine the options for vaccinedelivery to remote pastoral communities such as the Afar ofEthiopia, the Karamojong in Uganda, Nilotic peoples ofsouthern Sudan, and Arab and Fulani communities in easternChad. As conventional mass vaccination campaigns hadrepeatedly failed in these areas, the study team used a partic-ipatory approach to understand disease priorities, the dynam-ics of rinderpest, and the root cause of the repeated failureof vaccination campaigns in each area.

While communities explained how cattle raiding, inter-tribal conflict and war were common, they also noted howconventional vaccination was offered:• at inappropriate times relative to grazing schedules and

bodily conditions;• at locations during seasons of high disease and parasitic

burden;• at insecure locations;• for too short a period of time; or• not at all in some sub-sections of the community.

Veterinary staff often acknowledged these local concernsbut noted that their budgets were woefully inadequate andthat when money did become available, it was often at thewrong time of year relative to the farmers’ needs. In severalcountries it was found that government or project account-ing cycles determined the timing of campaigns. Teams wentto the field, fuel and allowances were spent, but the cattlesimply were not there.

It was clear that a major communication gap existedbetween the livestock owners and veterinary services, whichcreated a loss of confidence on both sides. Veterinary staffwere rarely from the local community and often did not havean appreciation of the needs and mobility of the productionsystem, especially in the case of pastoral communities. Also,the community structure, leadership, and conflicts were oftennot fully understood. Knowledge of entry points for dialogueand decision-making was lacking – veterinary staff often didnot realise that services were not offered in a way thatallowed livestock owners to utilise them.

Further discussion with livestock owners revealed how

Calves dying ofrinderpest insouthern Sudan inthe early 1990s. Thedisease is knownfor causing highmortality in cattle.

SPECIAL ISSU

E


Community participation and the global eradication of rinderpest 6

they identified the training of local community members,working under the guidance of the veterinary department,as a good solution for their lack of services. This led to theidea that community-based animal health workers (CAHWs)could be trained in basic animal health care and rinderpestvaccination, using TRV.

Community-based approaches to rinderpest control Early on it was recognised that for the community to fullyown the programme, it was essential that the CAHW systemshould meet their perceived needs and that they had beeninfluential in its design. When ranking diseases, rinderpestwas often ranked third or fourth priority. This was highenough to suggest that CAHWs would be able to addressrinderpest, but that other priority diseases needed also toreceive attention as far as it was possible to do so. Thus,CAHWs were trained and equipped on five to six other prior-ity issues in addition to rinderpest vaccination.

Livestock owners identified the need for services whenand where the cattle were located by mapping. In somecommunities, specific grazing locations that lacked roadaccess were identified as areas where cattle from severalcommunities gathered. A good example was the swamps ofKaramoja. In terms of rinderpest eradication, the remotegrazing areas where cattle mixed were also a priority.Segments of the community that utilised these areas weresought out and asked to select trainees.

The preparation of a rinderpest vaccine for injection andthe conduct of vaccination sessions requires good technicaland organisational skills. The CAHWs were trained by veteri-narians in a ten-day course using participatory training tech-niques, first in the classroom and then in the field. By the endof the training they were able to complete the tasks fault-lessly.

Evidence of success When an animal (or person) is vaccinated correctly, thevaccine causes them to develop protection against thedisease in question. This protection can take the form of anti-bodies in the blood of the animal, which neutralise thedisease agent should the animal become infected. One wayto measure the success of rinderpest vaccination is to checkhow many animals have produced antibodies. Therefore,vaccinations done by the CAHWs were assessed objectivelyat a number of project locations using blood samplescollected from cattle before and after vaccination, and meas-uring antibody levels at these two points in time.

Under practical conditions, it is generally recognised thatan 80% vaccination success rate reflects good work. For themost part, conventional vaccination campaigns achievebetween 70-80% success rates; some are lower. It was foundthat CAHWs performed at least as well as the professionalservices. In fact, in the CAHW programmes that were evalu-ated after blood testing, all had success rates of over 80%.

Some key lessons learntThe importance of dialogueThe more time that was invested in dialogue before trainingCAHWs, the greater the likelihood of smooth implementa-tion and success. For example, experience showed thatcommitment to cost recovery, a key tenet of theprogrammes, was weak when communities were told of therationale and agreed to it after only brief discussion. Muchgreater success was achieved through repeated meetingswhere problems were posed in activities such as role-playingand communities identified their own responsibilities.

Literate or illiterate CAHW trainees?Many educated stakeholders felt that literate CAHWs wererequired in order to read drug and vaccine labels and instruc-tions. However, the project found that literate trainees wereover-qualified for the task. Often they accepted the trainingas a stepping-stone to higher life goals. Within six months,they had moved on. On the other hand, non-literate CAHWswere committed livestock owners firmly anchored within the

“It is a story of progression from top-down institutional design to grass-rootsempowerment where dialogue hasmobilised communities and professionalsto meet both local and international goals”

Community-based animalhealth workersvaccinating cattlein the remoteAfar region ofEthiopia

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E


Jeffrey Mariner, Peter Roeder and Berhanu Admassu6

traditional way of life and their communities. They were veryproud to be CAHWs and had no trouble mastering the issueswhen training materials were prepared in pictographic form.

Seeing is believingThe thought of CAHWs conducting rinderpest vaccinationwas a concern in conservative professional circles. For some,this reflected a perceived threat to job security; in others itwas an issue of the quality of service. Both were validconcerns that needed to be addressed. Considerable effortwas invested in consulting veterinary stakeholders and insome cases, several years passed before pilot trials could beconducted. The key was to assure close monitoring andsupervision of all CAHWs by formally trained veterinarycadres and to design programmes with economic benefitsfor all stakeholders including formally trained veterinary staff.

Despite positive technical reports and laboratory studies,many decision makers still remained sceptical. The realturning point came when policy makers got out to the field,interviewed participants and saw the CAHWs in action. Theimpact of field trips and study tours was truly remarkable.Years later, the Director of the Interafrican Bureau of AnimalResources of the Organization of African Unity humorouslydescribed one field trip as something akin to ‘a religious expe-rience.’ Perhaps, it was at this point that decision makersdeveloped a sense of ownership.

Community-based approaches to rinderpestsurveillance In order to accomplish and sustain rinderpest eradication,vaccination programmes are followed by rinderpest surveil-lance. This involves stopping vaccination and being vigilantin case of disease resurgence. In order to verify the eradica-tion of rinderpest from a particular country, a set of interna-tional guidelines has been drawn up by the OIE. These

guidelines outline minimum surveillance requirements thateach participating country must meet in order to receiveinternational recognition of freedom from rinderpest. Inessence these standards are designed to ensure that coun-tries have adequate systems in place to find rinderpest, if itwere present.

Progressive veterinarians have long realised that pastorallivestock keepers often know a great deal about animaldiseases. Participatory methods are increasingly being usedand developed to make best use of this local knowledge forrinderpest surveillance. Although this might be viewed as anextractive use of the methods, rinderpest is nearly alwaysregarded as a devastating disease by livestock keepers and ifpossible they also want to eradicate the problem.

The techniques of participatory rural appraisal offer keyadjuncts to laboratory-based epidemiology. Normally,pastoralists have a very well developed knowledge of clinicaldiagnosis based on symptomology and patterns of transmis-sion, particularly in regard to major epidemic diseases such asrinderpest. They can very accurately recount the local historyregarding rinderpest and often are the first to recognise andreport the disease. The problem is that all too frequentlynobody listens. (FAO, 1996)

Example of aproblempicture used inCAHW trainingcourses

Participatory disease searching (PDS) is an inductive process of diseaseinvestigations. In the case of rinderpest, PDS can accomplish four basicgoals:1. find rinderpest if it is present, or provide evidence that it was

present in the past;2. understand the way that rinderpest survives in a particular community;3. describe the epidemic cycle; and, thereby,4. help to identify effective intervention methods adapted to local

conditions.Participatory disease searching is a hunt for disease. It has many

similarities to good detective work where one starts by identifying thekey witnesses and interviewing them as to what they saw. Everywitness is interviewed and the testimony is weighed for credibility andcompared with the accumulating body of evidence. The attitude of theinterview team is one of respect for all views combined with criticalreview. Just as in good detective work, direct observations are madeand physical evidence, such as samples for laboratory investigation, iscollected. The results of observations and tests are interpreted togetherwith the oral testimony in group discussions by the PDS team, a multi-disciplinary team including a veterinary and epidemiologists trained inPRA methods.

Participatory disease searching is a targeted undertaking, but it isimportant that the process is not undertaken in a leading manner. ThePDS team usually presents the study as a general assessment of animalhealth and initiates interviews by asking general questions on animalhealth. If the respondents mention the target disease, the informationcan be followed up by probing questions and visualisation, rankingand scoring techniques.

Box 1: Participatory Disease Searching

SPECIAL ISSU

E


Community participation and the global eradication of rinderpest 6

One of the benefits of CAHW networks is improvedcommunication links between livestock owners and theveterinary establishment. As pastoralists and veterinariansestablish productive relationships, each group learns from theother. Although a lot remains to be done, most veterinaryservices are now more aware of the livelihood systems andthe animal health status of pastoral areas than they were tenyears ago. The mere presence of viable delivery systemsadapted to local conditions improves disease surveillance.

In the process of setting up CAHW networks, it wasrealised that directly interviewing livestock owners on thepresence and history of rinderpest in their communitieswould greatly expand our understanding of the disease situ-ation. This technique was termed participatory diseasesearching (Box 1). In high-risk areas, both GREP and PACEhave undertaken field studies that improved and in someinstances revolutionised the understanding of rinderpest fieldepidemiology in professional circles.

Over the last decade, networks of CAHWs have beencreated in many parts of Africa and Asia. These networks,although endorsed by the veterinary services, are frequentlyhoused within development projects, emergency relief effortsor NGOs. They are ready-made disease information networksbut due to an absence of appropriate policies and frame-works, are not directly linked to national surveillance efforts.CAHW networks present a low-cost opportunity to respondto farmers’ reports with effective interventions tailored tosurveillance information. In the Horn of Africa, efforts are

now underway to develop stronger links with non-govern-mental and private CAHW networks for official diseasesurveillance tasks.

ConclusionCommunity-based animal health approaches have made aconsiderable contribution to the global eradication of rinder-pest. The combination of appropriate technology, commu-nity participation, and international rinderpest eradicationgave programmes a broad-based appeal that attracted theattention of communities, governments, NGOs, internationalagencies, universities, research facilities, and donors. Such adiverse range of organisations invariably brings together amotley assortment of individual perspectives. The process hasresulted in a significant exchange of ideas and an increasedunderstanding of the need for alternative methods to meeta common goal.

No one involved doubts the need for strong conventionalveterinary capacities. However experience has shown thatthey are not enough to do the job in traditional productionsystems. Programmes must respond to the livestock owners’needs in order to succeed and this means that an element oflocal control must be included. More than just sterile techni-cal data must pass up the chain of command. The paradoxand continuing challenge is how to effectively combine thetwo approaches yet it is certain that CAHWs can be effectiveeyes, ears, and hands at the service of communities andconventional veterinary services.

ABOUT THE AUTHORSJeffrey MarinerRDP Livestock Services BVPO Box 523, 3700AM Zeist, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected]

Peter RoederAnimal Health ServiceFAO, via Delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100Rome, Italy. Email: [email protected]

Berhanu AdmassuCAPE, PACE ProgrammeAU/IBARPO Box 30786, Nairobi, KenyaEmail: [email protected]

NOTESJeffery Mariner is seconded to the FeinsteinInternational Famine Centre, Tufts UniversitySchool of Nutrition by RDP Livestock Services.Peter Roeder is the Secretary of the GlobalRinderpest Eradication Programme working asan Animal Health Officer within the AnimalHealth Service of the UN’s Food and Agricul-ture Organization.Berhanu Admassu works for the Community-based Animal Health and ParticipatoryEpidemiology (CAPE) Unit, Pan AfricanProgramme for the Control of Epizootics,African Union/Interafrican Bureau for AnimalResources.

REFERENCESFAO, 1996. ‘Outreach to MarginalisedCommunities. The World Without Rinderpest.’Food and Agriculture Organization AnimalProduction and Health Paper 129, Rome, FAO.

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E


BackgroundThe Village Animal Health Worker (VAHW) training programmeof the United Mission to Nepal (UMN) began in January 1981,and is the longest continuously running programme of its kindin the world. United Mission to Nepal, (UMN), was establishedin 1954 as the first Christian consortium of its kind. Its objectiveis to serve the people of Nepal, especially the marginalised inunderserved areas, by enabling individuals and communities tosecure their basic needs in a sustainable manner through partic-ipation in effective and self-reliant Nepali organisations. Approx-imately 90% of Nepal’s population earns their living fromfarming, and more than half of that is subsistence level farmingon farms of less than half a hectare. Livestock are an essentialcomponent of the farming system, providing manure forfertiliser and draught power in addition to products for food,cash, and social needs. Twenty eight percent of rural householdincome is directly from livestock.

In the first 20 years, approximately 2000 VAHWs weretrained and approximately 75% of them were still servingtheir communities three to five years after their training. Theyprovide critical prevention and curative services to poorfarmers who are dependent on their livestock for survival, yethave no access to either private or government veterinaryservices. In 1991, there were 82 veterinarians serving farmersin a country with a human population of 22 million, and

more livestock per hectare of cultivated land than any othercountry in the world.

Developing a National Skills Test for VAHWs in NepalAlthough widely respected in their communities, the VAHWstrained by UMN had no official recognition or legal registra-tion. Therefore, in relating to the government veterinaryoffices in terms of referrals, vaccine procurement, or epidemi-ological control measures, they were disadvantaged and notwell utilised. The government also trained VAHWs but evenrecognition of these VAHWs was variously applied.

In 1997, the first conference in Nepal on the role of theVAHWs and their place in the national animal health care deliv-ery system was held in Kathmandu. Participants included UnitedMission to Nepal representatives, Department of LivestockServices officials, representatives of the government agency fortraining certification (Council of Technical Education and Voca-tional Training – CTEVT), European Union veterinary strength-ening programme, village animal health workers, andveterinarians. Participants were unanimous in their support forthe role of VAHWs, both those trained by United Mission toNepal and those trained by the government veterinary service.

Small groups discussed and reached consensus on therole of the VAHW, quality assurance methods, and a list ofbasic skills that VAHWs should be able to perform. Perhaps

by KAREN STOUFER, NARAYAN D. OJHA and ANAND PARAJULI

Village animal healthworkers in Nepal: the prosand cons of developing aNational Skills Test

7

SPECIAL ISSU

E


Village animal health workers in Nepal: the pros and cons of developing a National Skills Test 7

the most difficult issue to resolve was the minimum standardof education required by VAHWs, with the government vetsinsisting on higher entry-level standards than NGO vets feltwas necessary or appropriate.

At the end of the workshop, a resolution was passedwhich stated that a task force would be set up to carry forththe development of a nationally recognised skills test for allVAHWs under the auspices of CTEVT and with representa-tion from both government and non-government organisa-tions and veterinarians. Networking groups and otherworking groups were also established, and three furthermeetings were held in 1998 to carry this forward.

The final outcome of these efforts was the developmentof a standardised skills test for VAHWs to be administered bythe CTEVT. Successfully passing this practical examinationallows for the VAHW to be certified by the government andgiven status as equivalent to a government ‘level one’ post inthe civil service. This has resulted in greater recognition of thecontribution of VAHWs.

In current practice, the certification process for UMN-trained VAHWs works as follows: • VAHWs complete the two-week course. At the completion

of the course, the VAHWs and the trainers jointly set goalsfor the next six months to apply and share their skills withtheir community.

• After six months, the trainers meet with the VAHWs toreview their work and provide feedback. If at least 80% ofthe goals have been met by then, the participants receivea certificate for the training course.

• Those who receive this training course certificate will beeligible to take the skills test examination after a minimumof one year's experience.

Most VAHWs return for a four to five-day refresher coursepreceding the five-day skills test examination. Those passing theskills test examination receive the government CTEVT certifi-cate.

In contrast to the UMN approach to training, the Depart-ment of Livestock Services also trained VAHWs but using a35-day training course. These VAHWs were also required tosit the skills test.

Experiences with application of the National SkillsTest for VAHWsWhile the development of the VAHW skills test was a greatstride forward, there have been problems in the practicalapplication of this. In some cases, the logistics of examina-tions have been difficult, because many VAHWs live and workin very remote areas where it is difficult to conduct the skillstest examinations. In many cases, qualified and experiencedVAHWs cannot afford to come to the testing centres or payfor the examination, and the original sponsors who paid fortheir initial training are not willing, able or available to payfor their subsequent testing.

But by far, the biggest difficulty has been inter-governmentagency issues. The Department of Livestock Services did notrecognise trainees from the UMN programme, despite theircertificates, because the training is only two weeks, and thegovernment trainees receive 35 days. The two-week trainingincludes a great deal of hands-on practical training, severalhours per day of instruction, quality trainee selection, subsidisedfunding, and trainers who are both professionally qualified aswell as trained in practical teaching techniques. Rather thanbasing recognition on examination results, or hours of class-room instruction, the Department of Livestock Services has been

Village AnimalHealth Workersprovide valuableservices to thosedependent ontheir livestock

“Perhaps the most difficult issue toresolve was the minimum standard ofeducation required by VAHWs, with thegovernment vets insisting on higherentry-level standards than NGO vets feltwas necessary or appropriate”

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E


Karen Stoufer, Narayan D. Ojha and Anand Parajuli7

quite strict that a VAHW must have 35 days of instruction. Discussions are still going on, four years later, to resolve

these issues. Extending training to 35 days tends to eliminatemany qualified trainees who cannot afford to be away fromhome and farm, not earning income, for such a long time.Furthermore, the cost of the training increases significantlywhen the number of days is increased.

However, this is still not fully recognised as equivalent tothe government-trained VAHWs who pass the same exami-nation but have had 35 days training. There are now plans toadd a 15-day animal husbandry and management course sothe total number of training days will meet the Department ofLivestock Services requirement of 35 days (15-day initial train-ing, 5-day refresher, and 15-day husbandry and management).

Evidence that a two-week training for VAHWs iseffectiveSince the VAHW skills testing began, a total of 223 peoplepassed out of a total of 381 taking the test, for a national 58.5%pass rate. If we look only at trainees of Animal Health andConsultancy Services (now an independent NGO partner ofUMN) that delivers the two-week training, 159 passed out of251 who took the test, for a pass rate of 63.3%. These resultssuggest that UMN trainees have acquired skills at least as goodas trainees of other programmes, whose composite pass ratewas 49.2%.

ConclusionsGovernment certification and recognition has been seen asan important step in the development of VAHWs. It allowsthem to play a critical and essential role in national animalhealth programmes, and extends the reach of veterinary serv-ices to those who would otherwise have no access. However,this process has also tended to devalue those who, for what-ever reason (such as no access to training centres), have notbeen able to achieve certification. The certification processof standardising requirements has also raised the selectionstandards for VAHW trainees. In some ways, this has been a

positive step forward. However, it has also eliminated manyqualified and committed village people who lack the formaleducation standards (grade 10) required, which are seldomavailable to the poor, women, and those in very remote areas.

One very positive outcome has been the recognition forthe VAHW training textbook produced by United Mission toNepal. Many training programmes around the world haverequested copies to use in their courses. The original Nepaliversion has been translated into English to facilitate this. Thegovernment of Nepal is also now using United Mission toNepal’s textbook in their own courses.

Certification and recognition of the important role thatVAHWs play in livestock health and in poverty alleviationefforts for rural farmers have been positive steps forward thatbuild on the base of good trainee selection, adequate accessto medicines for VAHWs, practical training, and sufficientfollow-up after training.

Being well-trained as aVillage AnimalHealth Workerearned GyanMaya the respectof her farmingneighbours, bothmale and female

ABOUT THE AUTHORSDr. Karen Stoufer, Director, Rural DevelopmentDepartment, United Mission to NepalEmail: [email protected]. Narayan Ojha, United Mission to NepalEmail: [email protected]. Anand Parajuli, United Mission to NepalEmail: [email protected]

United Mission to Nepal, Box 126Kathmandu, Nepal.

NOTESDr. Karen Stoufer, a veterinarian, currentlyserves as Director of Rural Development for United Mission to Nepal. She and her familyhave worked in community development andtechnical training with UMN in Nepal for 12years as fieldworkers for Christian VeterinaryMission, Seattle, WA, USA. Narayan Ojha is chairman of the Animal HealthTraining and Consultancy Services and hasworked with UMN in the areas of animal

health training and community developmentfor 13 years. He has a Masters degree insustainable development from the School forInternational Training in Vermont, USA.Anand Parajuli is the Assistant Director of theRural Development Centre of UMN and has aBachelors degree in livestock from TribhuvanUniversity, Nepal. He has worked for 12 yearsin livestock development, the most recent fourwith UMN managing and delivering animalhealth and husbandry training.

SPECIAL ISSU

E


Epizootics (PACE) and Vétérinaries san frontières-Belgium(VSF-B) was given the task of implementing rinderpest erad-ication activities.

Complex messages in a complex situationThe community-based approach to rinderpest control insouthern Sudan proved very successful and by late 2001there had been no confirmed outbreaks of rinderpest for overthree years. However, at this time the programme was facedwith a major dilemma. Typically, rinderpest eradicationinvolves mass vaccination followed by a period of no vacci-nation, but actively watching and waiting to see if the diseasereappears. During this surveillance period, new outbreaks aredetected rapidly and further, localised vaccination removesthe disease for good. Rapid detection of outbreaks requiresgood relationships with communities who act as theprogramme’s eyes and ears on the ground.

However, for many years people had been very happywith regular vaccination campaigns and they recognised theireffectiveness. Therefore, programme staff realised that a newsurveillance strategy would be a major change for commu-nities and field-level veterinary workers. It was anticipatedthat people would not be happy with the change, would notunderstand the reasons for change, and might lose confi-dence and reduce their involvement in the programme. The

IntroductionAs explained in the paper by Jeff Mariner and colleagues inthis issue of PLA Notes, rinderpest is a devastating livestockdisease of major international importance. In southernSudan, livestock keepers associate the disease with disaster.Without cattle, they lose their main source of food, socialcapital, and reason for being.

The Operation Lifeline Sudan (OLS) Southern Sector Live-stock Programme is a consortium of non-governmentalorganisations (NGOs) coordinated by FAO-OLS (Food andAgriculture Organization of the United Nations and OLS). Theprogramme aims to improve food security for the war-affected communities in southern Sudan through improvinganimal health. In 1993 a community-based approach wasdeveloped which focused on training of community-basedanimal health workers (CAHWs) to vaccinate cattle againstrinderpest and treat common ailments. In 2001, theprogramme comprised approximately 1400 active CAHWssupervised by 180 animal health auxiliaries (AHAs) and stock-persons. Overall technical supervision was provided by 35veterinarians and livestock officers working for 12 NGOs andFAO. In collaboration with the Pan African RinderpestCampaign (PARC), the programme contributed towards aglobal effort to eradicate rinderpest. In 2001, PARC wasreplaced with the Pan African Programme for the Control of

by BRYONY JONES, ALUMA ARABA, PETER KOSKEI and SAMUEL LETEREUWA

Doing it for themselves: howcommunities developedmessages and communicationmethods for rinderpesteradication in southern Sudan

8

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E


Bryony Jones, Aluma Araba, Peter Koskei and Samuel Letereuwa8

challenge was to explain the new, potentially confusing strat-egy to communities, remove fears about the cessation ofvaccination, and create momentum and commitment for aperiod of ‘watching and waiting’.

As the need for a good communication campaign beganto emerge, there was also recognition of the operationalconstraints in southern Sudan. The area has very little infra-structure due to chronic civil war, and mass media commu-nication methods such as newspapers, radio or televisionwere not available. There was also the challenge of develop-ing communication methods to maintain awareness andinterest in the issues for a long period – the surveillanceperiod after stopping mass vaccination and before declaringfreedom from rinderpest is five years.

An approach to local development of extensionmessages and materialsFor many years, veterinarians have been describing how live-stock keepers in southern Sudan possess considerable indige-nous knowledge on livestock diseases. This knowledgeformed the basis for the community-based programme andcontributed towards programme design, implementation,and impact assessment. Furthermore, it was known thatverbal communication and song was central to the cultureof cattle-keeping communities in southern Sudan.

Given this situation, VSF Belgium decided to use commu-nity members to assist them to develop appropriate messagesand methods for communicating the new rinderpest controlstrategy. The idea was to explain the new strategy to somefield-level workers, artists, songwriters, and storytellers andrequest them to develop stories, songs, poems, and illustra-tions for transferring the messages within their communities.Any new message and method was to be tested in the fieldusing a real community audience.

Stage 1: Explaining the new strategy to programmemanagers and technical staffThe first stage was a series of awareness-raising and trainingevents with programme managers and various levels of veteri-

nary workers in the programme. These events were designedaccording to the roles of the participants in the programmeand ensured that all technical staff were well informed aboutthe new strategy and had an opportunity to ask questions andclarify any misunderstandings. Bearing in mind the scale ofthe programme it was necessary for all animal health workersto understand and be able to explain the new strategy to thelivestock owners. Many participants were familiar with partic-ipatory approaches and worked closely with communitiesduring normal CAHW project activities.

Stage 2: Developing messages and methods withcommunitiesOnce the programme staff and veterinary workers weretrained, a four-day workshop was organised to bring techni-cal staff together with community members to develop andtest extension messages and methods for the new rinderpeststrategy. The workshop was carried out in Marial Lou, TonjCounty. Participants included AHAs and stockpersons, fieldveterinarians, animal health trainers, community membersfrom Tonj County (singers, composers, teachers, story-tellers),and an artist and a film maker, both from Equatoria in south-ern Sudan. The participants from the community wereselected by asking local people for the names of people whowere known for their musical, story-telling or artistic skills.The teachers were invited from the local school.

“The challenge was to explain the new,potentially confusing strategy tocommunities, remove fears about thecessation of vaccination, and createmomentum and commitment for aperiod of ‘watching and waiting’ “

Awareness-raising workshops for programme coordinators, fieldveterinarians, and county/district veterinary coordinatorsThe new strategy was introduced during two two-day workshops,which aimed to build on the existing knowledge of the participants,introduce the components of the new strategy and allow discussionand raising of fears, and then develop action plans of how toimplement the strategy for vet workers.Training course for field veterinarians and Animal HealthAuxiliaries (AHAs) A six-day training course was developed to train vets and AHAs indetail in the new strategy and the components, and carry out practicalsin outbreak investigation, active surveillance and develop action plans.This was field-tested and modified and then later edited again in thelight of further experience.Training course for CAHWsA training course was developed, field-tested and modified beforebeing documented and circulated for all animal health workers to useto inform the CAHWs of the new strategy. Also, a Community DialogueMeeting Programme was developed, field-tested and modified beforebeing documented and circulated. Some existing cloth flip charts(copied from the Pan African Rinderpest Campaign in Uganda) wereput into use to assist with training, and some photographs from FAOarchives were printed and laminated as rinderpest identification cards.

Box 1. Creating awareness among partners and trainingveterinary workers

SPECIAL ISSU

E


Doing it for themselves: how communities developed messages and communication methods for rinderpest eradication in southern Sudan 8

The workshop aimed to build on the existing knowledgeand experience of the participants, and used several partici-patory techniques: plenary discussion, group discussion,brainstorm, and question and answer. The sessions wereconducted in English with translation into Dinka, the locallanguage.

The workshop was felt to be a great success for the devel-opment of materials for extension of the rinderpest eradica-tion strategy and as an opportunity to explore generally theprocess of dialogue and communication methods. Levels ofparticipation and innovation were high. The singing anddancing group attracted the most interest from the partici-pants and from the local community. This is a very entertain-ing and powerful way of passing messages. The use ofdramas and stories captured interest and appeared toincrease understanding of the points being made. The appar-ently difficult concept of stopping rinderpest vaccination waseasily understood.

Stage 3: Scaling upFollowing the success of these workshops, the next stage wasto spread the approach throughout the programme. Thecommunity-level workshops (Stage 2) were incorporated into

Below: Practising a song in the workshop in Marial Lou; and (bottom) Women’s Association in Akobo sing anddance with John Jooyul, VSF Belgium vet

• Introductions and expectations.• Methods of communication: discussion on what methods people use

within their community to pass information (traditional and modern).• The new rinderpest eradication strategy: explaining the key points of

the strategy that needed to be communicated to the widercommunity.

• The target community: discussion on who are the different types ofpeople who need to know about rinderpest eradication in order toplay their role.

• Development of community awareness-raising materials: break upinto groups to develop different methods of communicating some ofthe key pieces of information; groups were song/dance, stories anddrama, pictures, community dialogue, education.

• Demonstration of community awareness-raising materials: thegroups came back to the main workshop and performed orpresented their work, and received feedback from the otherparticipants.

• Preparation for the community dialogue meeting: a programme for acommunity meeting was developed and different people assigned tolead different sessions, and pictures, songs, poems, and stories wereintegrated to introduce, illustrate or stimulate discussion.

• Community dialogue meeting on rinderpest eradication: a four-hourmeeting was held for community leaders and members from in andaround Marial Lou. Participants numbered over 100 and includedmen, women, and children.

• Review of community dialogue meeting: the workshop participantsevaluated the meeting and identified improvements for futuremeetings.

Box 2. Activities in the first community workshop

A song: We are fighting rinderpest (led by Luka Malok)I do not like dwelling with the devil disease whose eyes look badWe are fighting rinderpestI do not like dwelling with devil disease whose horns look very roughWe are fighting rinderpestI do not like dwelling with devil disease whose claws look roughWe are fighting rinderpestThis disease which has comeIt used to give the cow diarrhoea, eye discharge, tearing and nasal

dischargeCall the people of VSF to draw the blood for checking rinderpestCall the people of FAO to draw blood for checking rinderpest

Traditional stories were also adapted to explain the newrinderpest strategyImagine you must to kill your most dreaded enemy and you see himenter his hut. You take your gun and fire into the hut. You fire a lot ofbullets into that hut to make sure your enemy is finished. But do youkeep firing forever? No, sooner or later you stop. You wait outside thehut to see if the enemy reappears. Then when you see no sign of him,you approach the hut and look very carefully inside to make sure thatonce and for all, your enemy has gone. This is like rinderpest. Wevaccinate for many years and then we stop, wait, and watch.

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E


Bryony Jones, Aluma Araba, Peter Koskei and Samuel Letereuwa8

the training course for field veterinarians and AHAs, so thatas they learned the new strategy, they also explored and prac-ticed methods of communicating that strategy to theircommunity.

The rinderpest eradication training course has now beenheld in thirteen counties or states including the communica-tion component. The communication component is alsoincluded in the AHA training course as a practical exampleof how to communicate important information to thecommunity. Innovation among the veterinary workers isencouraged so that communication methods can varyaccording to the preferences of different communities, andlanguage and cultural variations. The important point is toretain the key concept in all the methods – of stopping vacci-nation and conducting surveillance.

In different areas a variety of communication methodshave been developed. Some groups focused more on dramaand poems, others on songs, others on stories, and otherson pictures. All put these to use during the subsequentcommunity dialogue meeting. In one area, it was noted thatthe youth were not really included and therefore, a dancewas organised. Input from the project was some batteries forthe music system and some bars of soap for prizes. In aninterval during the dance the AHAs made a presentation onrinderpest eradication and gave a prize to the person whocould describe the clinical signs of rinderpest the best.

In another area a football and volleyball match was heldfor competing teams of youth. Again the opportunity wasseized to pass some information on rinderpest eradication.

In another area they went to the local school and madepresentations on rinderpest to the school children. There hasbeen demand for audiotapes and batteries so that songsdeveloped in their home areas after the training coursescould be recorded.

Lessons learnt• In rinderpest eradication, the shift from mass vaccination

to surveillance is a difficult concept – some vets find it diffi-cult to understand! Despite this, artists, songwriters, poets,and others in communities were able to grasp the idea andtransform it into locally appropriate messages andmethods.

• The incorporation of songs, drama, pictures, and so onmakes communication with the community more fun, andeasier to get and hold people’s attention.

• The animal health workers have reached a wide audienceincluding women, children, and youth. Serious formalspeech-type meetings mainly attract mature men, butwhen a song or drama is performed all members of thecommunity are attracted to find out what is going on andthe reduced formality allows them to stay and participate.

• The approach has increasingly moved the responsibility forcommunication to the Sudanese animal health workers andaway from the field veterinarians (who are mostly fromother communities or countries). It has encouraged them tointerpret the information into their own language in a waythat lay people can understand and can actively communi-cate.

Simon Gatweekand Thomas TutPal use cloth flipchart pictures inAkobo

Example ofa pictureused in thecloth flipcharts

SPECIAL ISSU

E


Doing it for themselves: how communities developed messages and communication methods for rinderpest eradication in southern Sudan 8

• It has brought out skills of some of the animal healthworkers who may be less academic but are goodperformers and communicators.

• The workshops tried to encourage people to think more

innovatively and not to stick to the usual method oftalking only. Information flows quickly and as someanimal health workers have heard about what has goneon in other areas, the method has gained some momen-tum and almost competitiveness to produce better songsor pictures or dramas for their own area.

• It is an effort for some field vets and animal healthworkers to be innovative and some are initially reluctantto participate, but as they see others getting involved thisreluctance breaks down and some individuals suddenlydemonstrate hidden talents!

• More ideas for different communication methods areregularly coming up. It is hoped that these will continueto maintain interest and awareness in the programmeuntil rinderpest eradication is finally achieved.

Is this a participatory process?Rinderpest is a disease of global concern and our workcontributes to the Pan African Programme for the Controlof Epizootics and the Global Rinderpest EradicationProgramme. The eradication strategy is designed byepidemiologists far from the field, who expect communi-ties to ‘participate’. In southern Sudan, this is not aproblem. Here, people have long recognised the terribleimpact of rinderpest and have been working with theprogramme for nearly ten years. Therefore, the programmeis a good example of ‘outsiders’ and communities workingtogether.

Now if you go to Marial, even the children are singingthe rinderpest songs.

Nhial Riek andSimon Gatweekpractice a dramaabout rinderpestsurveillance

ABOUT THE AUTHORSBryony Jones, VSF-Belgium, PO Box 13986,Nairobi, Kenya. Email: [email protected]

NOTESAll the authors are veterinarians working forthe Fight Against Lineage One Rinderpest VirusProject for southern Sudan, implemented byVSF-Belgium.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis work was initiated and supported duringthe early stages by the CAPE Unit, PACEProgramme, AU/IBAR and implemented byVSF-Belgium. The main donor of the CAPEUnit is DFID. VSF-Belgium has continued thework as part of the Fight Against Lineage OneRinderpest Virus Project for southern Sudan,which is funded by the PACE Programme ofAU/IBAR, an EC-funded programme.Thanks go to all the communities, animalhealth workers, and field personnel of NGOsand FAO who have enthusiastically partici-pated in this work.

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E


IntroductionAlmost by definition, community-based animal healthprogrammes operate in more remote and marginalised areas.Difficult access to these areas often means that limited diseaseinvestigation or research has been conducted and therefore,basic technical information on livestock diseases is lacking.During participatory assessment, livestock keepers usually iden-tify a limited number of important diseases that can beprevented or treated by community-based animal healthworkers (CAHWs). Typically, the selection of medicines to reduceproblems such as worms, ticks, trypanosomiasis or otherdiseases is decided by a veterinarian or animal health assistant.Professional judgements are made concerning the most appro-priate types of medicines to use, and how to use them. Thisapproach enables CAHW programmes to become functionalrelatively quickly and people soon see the benefits of improvedanimal health. However, there are important limitations:• Some important diseases ‘look the same’. They show

similar clinical signs and can only be distinguished usinglaboratory tests or other diagnostic procedures. To compli-cate matters, an animal can also be suffering from two ormore diseases at the same time. In remote areas, thenearest laboratory can be many kilometres away and bloodor tissue samples are easily spoiled in transit to the labora-tory. Even when diagnostic tests are available for field use,

veterinarians can lack the specialist skills required to useand interpret the tests correctly. If identification of a diseaseproblem is incorrect, CAHWs will be trained to prevent ortreat the wrong disease.

• Even when diseases are correctly identified and successfullycontrolled in the short-term, long-term control strategiesrequire an understanding of the epidemiology andeconomics of disease. The epidemiology of livestockdiseases is often complex and sub-optimal use of medicinescan lead to drug resistance. Medicines used in CAHWprogrammes include drugs to control worms(anthelmintics), bacterial infections (antibiotics), blood para-sites (e.g. trypanocides), and ticks (acaricides). Resistanceto all these drug types is common, even in relatively devel-oped areas where veterinarians control drug distributionand use. As CAHW programmes develop, veterinary profes-sionals need to provide advise on the use of medicinesbased on technical information.

Both these issues indicate that CAHW programmes canbe strengthened through linkages with veterinary investiga-tion specialists and researchers. This paper describes howsuch linkages were developed in southern Sudan, Kenya, andTanzania. It discusses how both CAHW programmes andresearchers benefit from working together using participa-tory research approaches.

by ANDY CATLEY, LIEVE LYNEN and STEVEN NALITOLELA

Linking research andcommunity-based animalhealthcare in East Africa

9

SPECIAL ISSU

E


Linking research and community-based animal healthcare in East Africa 9

Linking community-based projects to veterinaryresearchersThe Participatory Approaches to Veterinary Epidemiology(PAVE) project at IIED ran from 1998 to 2000 and aimed toassess the roles of participatory appraisal in veterinary investi-gation and epidemiology. The first stage of the project was asurvey of veterinarians working in Africa to find out if and howthey were using participatory approaches and methods. Animportant finding of the survey was that although many vetsconsidered participatory approaches to be good for buildingbetter relationships with communities, they also felt thatparticipatory methods were not reliable and therefore, notacceptable to senior decision makers (Catley, 2000). For veteri-nary researchers, there was a strong feeling that ‘we can’tpublish papers if we use these methods, and we mustpublish.’

Therefore, PAVE focused on assessing the validity and reli-ability of methods. The research methodology was based ona series of disease studies and comparison of results derivedfrom participatory and conventional veterinary methods. PAVEhoped to work with field-level animal health workers todesign and implement studies on disease problems. The crite-ria for selecting research partners and topics for researchincluded:• evidence that livestock keepers had requested assistance to

solve a particular disease problem;• presence of a well-established and functional animal health

service at field level, with good links to communities; and• capacity for sharing of research costs with PAVE.

PAVE was not restricted to specific disease problems. Withthese criteria in mind, PAVE approached government veteri-nary services, research institutes, and non governmentalorganisations to identify research topics and partners. TwoPAVE studies involved work with CAHW programmes insouthern Sudan and Kenya, as summarised in Table 1.

The Ormilo Research Project is based at the VeterinaryInvestigation Centre, Arusha, Tanzania and is ongoing. Ormiloemerged as a problem in northern Tanzania around 1980 andwas diagnosed by veterinarians as bovine cerebral theilerio-sis1 (using molecular diagnostics tools). The outputs of theproject were to confirm the incidence of the disease, to assessits true social and economic impact, to record the presence ofblood parasites and other possible disease agents and riskfactors, and to make a start in understanding the epidemiol-ogy of this disease. One interesting feature of the disease wasthat the causal parasite was previously thought to be harm-less to cattle. The project also aimed to evaluate possible treat-ment regimes and to develop appropriate control methods.

What’s yourdiagnosis? A thincow in southernSudan could besuffering fromvarious diseases

1 This disease is caused by a parasite called Theileria taurotragi that is transmittedby ticks. Affected cattle show signs of nervous system disease.

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E


Andy Catley, Lieve Lynen and Steven Nalitolela9

Who was saying that the research was needed? In the three studies outlined in Table 1, there was strongevidence that the research topic was a priority for livestockkeepers. In southern Sudan, the disease called liei wasmentioned with increasing frequency by herders to NGO vetson the ground. The exact diagnosis of this chronic wastingdisease, and therefore the most appropriate treatment, wasthe subject of debate among vets and herders. In Kenya,trypanosomiasis in cattle was considered a priority by cattleherders in Tana River and there was regular purchase of drugsto prevent and treat the disease. However, the KenyaTrypanosomiasis Research Institute was keen to test alterna-tive methods of disease control, and was also concerned thatsub-optimal use of drugs might lead to drug resistance.Therefore, the Tana River study included participatory analy-sis of control methods for trypanosomiasis and identificationof best-bet solutions. In both studies, research objectives andstudy locations were defined with partner organisationscentrally. However, the detailed design of the research wasconducted at field level with the assistance of various localplayers, including CAHWs.

In the Ormilo Research Project, the need to investigatethe disease was articulated by livestock keepers during partic-ipatory ranking of priority diseases in 2000 and 2001 carriedout by another project, the Tick and Tick-borne DiseaseControl Project. Ormilo was ranked as the highest diseasepriority by pastoralist communities and up to 80% of affectedanimals died. Conventional and ethnoveterinary controlmethods had proved to be unsuccessful.

Roles of community-based workers Research designIn more effective community-based animal healthprogrammes, communities select workers who arerespected, active, good communicators, and who possessknow-how of livestock management and diseases. There-fore, when designing research activities it is useful to forma team comprising the ‘outsider’ researchers and field-levelworkers. CAHWs and other workers can provide informa-tion on issues such as:• history of the communities;• community leadership and organisation, and local politics;• location of livestock and communities, and seasonal move-

ments;• appropriate ways to approach communities and conven-

ient times for meetings and other activities;• logistics – condition of paths, roads, and rivers; areas of

insecurity; and,• possible expectations of communities.

Although CAHWs may be illiterate, methods such asparticipatory mapping by groups of CAHWs can be veryuseful for visualising the research area and identifying specificcommunities or livestock herds for research activities. Thisapplies to either purposive or random sampling approaches.In all three studies described here, CAHWs were involved inidentifying research sites.

Research implementationIn addition to helping with planning the research activities on

Description Community-based animal healthprogrammes

Technical partners

Southern SudanPAVE Project:Diagnosis of liei, a chronic wasting disease in cattle WesternUpper Nile, Upper Nile, and Bahr el Ghazal, with Nuer andDinka communities. Local characterisation of diseases andcomparison with veterinary opinion, pathological examination,and laboratory investigation.

• Operation Lifeline Sudan (SouthernSector) Livestock Programme

• VSF Switzerland• Save the Children UK

• Kenya Trypanosomiasis Research Institute(KETRI)

KenyaPAVE Project:Studies on bovine trypanosomiasis or gandi with Ormacommunities in Tana River District. Local characterisation ofdisease, incidence estimates, and analysis of preferences fordisease control methods.

• Catholic Relief Services• Diocese of Malindi

• Kenya Trypanosomiasis Research Institute(KETRI)

TanzaniaOrmilo Research Project:Studies on bovine cerebral theileriosis or ormilo with Maasaicommunities in Arusha region. Sampling of clinical cases,estimates of disease incidence, drug trials on clinical cases

• VETAID-Tanzania• Ilaramatak (a local pastoralist NGO)

• Veterinary Investigation Centre, Arusha(Ministry of Water and LivestockDevelopment)

• Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania• University of Pretoria, South Africa

Table 1: Research activities involving community-based animal health programmes

SPECIAL ISSU

E



the ground, community-based workers can also greatly assistwith research implementation. For example, in the PAVEstudy in southern Sudan, local workers were trained as trans-lators and facilitators for participatory methods.

Another important task can be sampling animals andwith some additional training, CAHWs soon become skilledat taking blood or other samples. Commonly, livestock areless disturbed by CAHWs than by visitors, and the samplingis actually easier with CAHWs than people with more formaltraining. Also, livestock keepers may prefer to have localCAHWs rather than outsiders handling their animals. In thePAVE Project in southern Sudan, CAHWs had been previ-ously trained by UNICEF, Save the Children UK, and Vétéri-naires san frontières-Switzerland depending on location. Forthe research, further hands-on training was provided incollection of blood samples from the jugular vein into bloodtubes (vacutainers). A vet supervised the CAHWs when theywere sampling. Here, it was clear that pastoralist CAHWswere used to bleeding cattle and easily located a jugularvein, even in fractious animals.

In the Ormilo project a different approach was used

because the project involved regular monitoring of sentinel2

herds in locations where no vets were present. The CAHWshad already undergone a two-week training course in 2000at the Simanjiro Animal Health Training Centre, implementedby an NGO called Ilaramatak in collaboration with VetAidTanzania. They had also received an additional two weeks offollow-up (refresher) training in 2001. At the start of theproject, further training was given to CAHWs on samplecollection, filling in of clinical cards, and clinical examinationof animals as well as post mortem examinations.

Drug treatments were discussed as well as dosage andweighing of animals. Equipment such as microscope slides,slide storage boxes, alcohol preservatives, drugs, and needleswere handed over to the CAHWs. A researcher or fieldofficer visited the CAHWs every two weeks and all samplescollected were handed over. This project also used CAHWsto administer on-the-spot treatments to cases of ormilo andin some cases, administer daily injections for up to four days.

Well establishedcommunity-basedprogrammes insouthern Sudanuse participatorymethods toanalyse livestockdisease problems

2 The sentinel herds comprised livestock managed under normal field conditionsby their keepers, and which were used to detect new cases of Ormilo and testdifferent treatments.

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E



Again, the close proximity of the CAHWs to the livestockand the understanding between CAHWs and herders madepossible this aspect of the research.

Sharing the findingsAs findings start to emerge from research, the presence ofa CAHW system means that a mechanism for disseminatingand discussing results is already in place. For example, insouthern Sudan research findings were used to revise CAHWtraining courses and materials, and so better equip them tohandle cases of liei. In Tanzania, results were discussedduring the regular field visits by researchers or field officersto the study sites and CAHWs disseminated messages tocommunities during village meetings.

Should CAHWs be paid for their work?Whatever the role of CAHWs, it is important at the begin-

ning to discuss and agree incentives. When CAHWs work inthe private sector, they cannot be expected to work fornothing and payments need to be defined. Also, manyresearchers use free treatment of animals as an incentive forlivestock keepers to ‘participate’ in research. We prefer notto do this, but use CAHWs to provide treatments using theirusual charging system. If the problem being investigated isa local priority, people are usually willing to take time todiscuss the problem.

In the Ormilo project, CAHWs were paid a monthlyallowance of Tanzania Shillings 20,000 (USD 20) after theyhad been appraised on their performance during thatmonth. If irregularities occurred, such as poor compliance infilling in clinical cards, identification and fixation of samples,poor documentation of treatments and follow-up, andmisuse of the drugs, the allowance was not paid. In south-ern Sudan, the research was more short-term and CAHWswere recruited on a daily basis and payments in cash, foodor soap agreed beforehand.

Outcomes of the research PAVE Southern Sudan As described above, information about the diagnosis of lieiwas used to revise some training courses for CAHWs andother veterinary workers in southern Sudan. The researchalso led to a proposal to work with communities to testdifferent treatments for liei, including assessment of clinicalresponses to treatment by both livestock keepers and vets.An important lesson however was that this proposal did notattract donor support, apparently because it lacked a quan-titative description of liei in southern Sudan and evidencethat communities perceived the disease as a major problem.At this time, two papers about the research had beenpublished in a leading veterinary journal, including anaccount of how communities expressed a need for theresearch. This indicated that while an independent peer-reviewed assessment of the research was positive, donorassessment was driven by other values.

PAVE Tana RiverThe study in Tana River enabled KETRI, the main researchpartner, to revise their project. Initially, the project focused onthe control of tsetse flies that transmit the disease trypanoso-miasis. However, community assessment revealed thatpeople were already accustomed to using drugs to preventor control the disease, and they preferred information onhow to use the drugs properly rather than control tsetseflies. They also assessed various control options in terms ofthe likely sustainability of each option and again, opted for

■ Identifying informants and organising groupsAs CAHWs can have very good relationships with communities andknow who is who, they can assist with identifying informants andorganising groups for discussions and sessions using participatorymethods. CAHWs can be key informants for identifying otherinformants of various categories e.g. men and women, rich and poor.■ TranslationCAHWs can be good translators if they speak the languages of theresearchers and the community, but the usual rules apply. They can bebiased and careful practice of interviews is required to ensure thatquestions and answers are properly translated. Translation is a skill –despite practise, not all CAHWs will make good translators.■ SamplingRoutine training of CAHWs does not usually include sample collection.However, with additional training they often become skilled at takingblood or other samples. Teams of CAHWs, supervised by researchers,can be very efficient at this task.■ Administering trial treatmentsAfter sampling, a research project may require administration of trialmedicines. As CAHWs are always with the animals, they can providethese treatments and record their activities. As with sampling,additional training is usually needed.■ Disseminating findingsAn existing network of CAHWs is a ready-made system fordisseminating research findings to livestock keepers. Dissemination canbe via community meetings or individual contact with people. Methodsinclude simple oral transfer of news about a project to disseminationof leaflets or other materials.■ Applying new disease control strategies, better use ofmedicinesWhen research leads to recommendations about improved ways tocontrol disease, researchers can work with trainers of CAHWs toincorporate new information into CAHW refresher training courses.Again, CAHW systems are ready made networks for actually applyingnew methods of disease control.

Box 1: CAHWs and research implementation

SPECIAL ISSU

E



the improved use of drugs. Although this was a goodexample of how community-based analysis can helpresearchers to refine their work, the actual implementationof the revised project was stopped by conflict between Ormapastoral communities and neighbouring Pokomo farmers.This experience indicated that in common with conventionalresearch approaches, more community-based research isalso affected by factors outside the control of theresearchers.

Ormilo Research Project The close monitoring of the sentinel herds by CAHWs aswell as treatment of Ormilo cases has provided a betterunderstanding of the age groups of cattle affected by thedisease. It has also allowed an interim evaluation of differ-ent treatment options and confirmed the presence of thedisease and causal parasite in the areas in the study. Thework is ongoing and so far, disease confirmation could onlybe done (using molecular tools) on post-mortem samples.Therefore, care has to be taken on the treatment messagesdisseminated back to communities via the CAHWs aboutwhich drugs work best. However, the communities involvedare happy with progress because the research hasconfirmed their opinion at the start of the project thatOrmilo was different from classical East Coast Fever (ECF).This is an important scientific finding as the limited literatureavailable restricts the condition of cerebral theileriosis inEast Africa to ECF.

Lessons learnt Strengths of using CAHWs for research • Researchers addressing local problems with local people,

rather than working in isolation of realities on theground.

• CAHWs are key informants with good understanding ofdisease; they can be trained in research tasks (e.g. samplecollection, translation) and because they are trusted locally,can assist with communicating with and organisingcommunity involvement.

• CAHWs are willing to work in remote areas under difficultconditions i.e. their normal working conditions, and willwalk long distances to follow up reports of sick animals.

• CAHWs are close to the animals so that sample collectionand treatments happen soon after animals become sick.

• Solutions to problems are tailored to local needs andcapacity.

• A delivery system for research findings, via CAHWs, isalready in place.

• A monitoring system for measuring both uptake and theimpact of uptake of research findings is already in place.

• Although CAHWs need financial incentives, they are stillrelatively inexpensive.

• Improves technical credibility of CAHW programmes andhelps to establish acceptance among policy makers.

Limitations of using CAHWs for research • Needs more time to arrange the research, e.g. written

Community-basedanimal health workersare experiencedhandlers of livestockand with someadditional training,soon become adept atsample collection.

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E



ABOUT THE AUTHORSAndy CatleyCAPE Unit, PACE, OAU-IBARPO Box 30786, 00100 Nairobi, KenyaEmail: [email protected] LynenPO Box 1068, VI Arusha, TanzaniaEmail: [email protected] NalitolelaPO Box 15249, Arusha, TanzaniaEmail: [email protected] Catley is a veterinarian working for theCommunity-based Animal Health and Partici-patory Epidemiology Unit, Pan African

Programme for the Control of Epizootics,African Union’s Interafrican Bureau for AnimalResources, on secondment from the FeinsteinInternational Famine Centre, Tufts UniversityUSA. Lieve Lynen is a veterinarian acting as TechnicalAdvisor for the National Tick and Tick-borneDisease Control programme in Tanzania andworking as Research Officer in the OrmiloResearch Project in Arusha region. Steven Nalitolela is a veterinarian working withVetAid in Simanjiro district Tanzania. He hasworked in participatory animal health as wellas using an holistic approach to pastoralistvillage development. He has 16-years work

experience, with five years working at commu-nity level with Maasai pastoralists.REFERENCESCatley, A. (2000). The use of participatoryappraisal by veterinarians in Africa. OfficeInternational des Epizooties Scientific and Tech-nical Review, 19 (3), 702-714.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe PAVE project was implemented by IIED andthe African Union’s Interafrican Bureau forAnimal Resources. Both PAVE and the OrmiloResearch Project were funded by the AnimalHealth Programme of the Department forInternational Development, United Kingdom.

agreements need to be made with more agencies than isthe case with conventional approaches.

• Researchers need to be adaptive to constraints in moreinaccessible areas and willing to adopt more participatoryresearch approaches: this can require training ofresearchers, and lengthens the research process andincreases costs.

• CAHWs make useful informants, translators, interviewers,and sample collectors, but bias needs to be considered –good supervision is important.

• CAHWs can be influenced by powerful elders or villageleaders to use project medicines to treat animals affectedby diseases other than those under investigation. Again,

good supervision and monitoring is needed.• Researchers need to work with good translators during

CAHW training and when disseminating research findings.Poor translation can lead to confused messages beingpassed back to the community.

• A strong, well-established CAHW programme is neededto work with, as misunderstandings regarding financialremuneration between an implementing agency such asan NGO and the CAHWs can arise. This can interfere withthe research process.

• Research using CAHWs is subject to some of theconstraints facing more conventional approaches, such asinsecurity and donor support.

These CAHWs inTanzania prepareand store bloodsmears in the OrmiloResearch Project

SPECIAL ISSU

E


Bolivia and Peru. In the initial programme in San Julian, eightfarmer trainers trained 1,500 villagers and 24 community-based animal health workers (CAHWs). The programmebegan in the San Julian/Brecha Casarave region in 1989 withfunding spanning nine years. In 1990 work began in theBerlin Colony and continued until 1997. In Santa Rosa it ranfrom 1991-95. In Yapacani and Las Gamas work began in1997 and is ongoing.

The initial programme in Brecha Casarave and Berlin wascalled Proyecto Pecuario de la Comunidad (PROPECO) –Community Originated Livestock Training. The programmewas general community training in livestock production andhealthcare in a sustainable farm system for any communitymember who wanted it. Local men and women farmers astrainers also administered the training programme throughtheir local associations. In each instance, priorities were to trainevery farmer who requested it, and build local people’s andorganisations’ capacity to develop and administer their ownprogrammes. For the system of animal production to changeon a large scale (from causing erosion and poor productiondue to bad health to being part of a sustainable system withexcellent production), a critical mass of informed people apply-ing what they had learnt was required. Training village animalhealth workers came later as a result of village requests forpeople who could act as extensionists and trainers in the

IntroductionIn 1988, farmers from villages in lowland, primarily resettle-ment areas (San Julian/Brecha Casarave and Berlin zones) ofSanta Cruz, Bolivia requested training in livestock healthcare. In the early 1970s many people who had lived in thehighlands of Bolivia migrated to the Amazon basin area ofSanta Cruz to practice slash and burn (swidden) agriculture,leading to the development of sometimes massive settle-ments. The in-migration continues to this day. Because ofthe rapidly declining fertility of the land due to swidden agri-cultural practices, some farmers decided to switch from arice and corn based cash crop economy, in which they couldnot compete with large producers in the region, to a live-stock based economy.

The programme that developed with local farmer’s organ-isations (Asociacion de Ganaderos de San Julian, AsociacionPecuaria de Berlin, Cooperativa Agropecuaria de Berlin,Asociacion de Pequeños Ganaderos de Santa Rosa de Sara,Union de Pequeños Ganaderos de Bolivia en Yapacani), alocal non-governmental organisation (Fundación Integral deDesarrollo), and two international non-governmental organ-isations (World Concern/Christian Veterinary Mission andHeifer Project International) was later successfully replicated(with local modifications) in other resettlement areas, and inlong established lowland and highland communities of

by SUSAN E STEWART

Community-based animalhealth training and creativechange in Bolivia

10

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E


Susan E Stewart10

communities, with a better understanding of the use of medi-cines and vaccines. There are three basic premises that guidedthese programmes and a number of approaches common tothem. These programmes continue to have excellent resultsafter the project funding has discontinued because of themotivation and creativity of the local people involved.

Basic Premise One Every farmer should have access to as much informationabout livestock care in her/his primary language as she or hewants.

Why? The more women and men farmers know, themore they use and demand the development of local animalhealth care services, the healthier the animals, the less inci-dence of disease transmittance to people (zoonotic diseases),and the greater the livestock production. Wherever possibletraining should always be in the local first language of thepeople. Written materials in the local language were lessimportant in Bolivia because most people who could readand write did not read in their first language.

ApproachesFarmers as local trainers and facilitatorsTrain women and men farmers (at least bilingual, average 4thgrade formal education) to be the trainers and facilitators inthe programme. The programme should also have a verysmall number of technical people trained at university level.Their job is to replicate their posts by training, supporting,and acting as mentors to local Farmer Trainers who facilitateall of the village level training.

Farmer Trainers are people who:• own land in the community;• have a history of service and a strong desire to serve;• have a high emotional intelligence (people skills);• have some experience with livestock production;• are recommended by trusted informants as gregarious

people who connect people to one another;• are part-time, paid staff of the project or local organisation;

and,• work in teams throughout the region.

A Farmer Trainer and a community animal health worker(CAHW) are very different. A CAHW in this programme issomeone who provides preventive and some curative carewith livestock as well as facilitating training in her/his ownvillage, and acting as change agents in their village organi-sations. All CAHWs are trained with listening and facilitationskills. Together, Farmer Trainers and technicians train theCAHWs. CAHWs are viewed as an integral part of the villagedevelopment process and are chosen by the villages in a deci-

sion-making process, and not labelled as vaccinators or medi-cine shop operators (although the CAHWs certainly do vacci-nations and some have medicine shops).

Designing participative village-level training Together with the local trainers, project technical staff designbasic, village-level, participative modules which are fun, easyto use, and require no reading or writing, no secondlanguage skills, and no special expertise in order for peopleto participate. Designing the tools so that a vivid problem orsituation is brought to life for participants is the greatest chal-lenge and the most important aspect of the training design.

Other important training design issues include:

Focus on what farmers want In the general community-based training, focus on key issuesthe farmers are interested in. Most things are fairly simple to acton, e.g. what would make the biggest difference in produc-tion, or the most money for people, or protect their childrenfrom getting sick. To set this focus requires a very good assess-ment – lots of time sitting and listening to women and menfarmers and visiting their livestock and fields with them.

Teach prevention and management in the context ofdisease Focus on prevention but from a disease perspective, not fromthat of the value of prevention alone. The people want tolearn about treatment of disease because that is what mostconcerns them. However, prevention will often make a biggerdifference. We teach about the disease first (the sicknesscaused by malnutrition or parasites and the diseases prevent-able by vaccination) then the treatment (where possible) butreally stress prevention. Every community member whowants to, learns how to vaccinate, de-worm, and keep themedicines and vaccines cold. They may do their own vacci-nating or not, but they do require accuracy on the part of theCAHWs because they are well informed.

Give enough time for people-to-people learningPlan a big enough block of time for training sessions so thatpeople get to know and trust one another. We give three- tofive-day workshops depending on the topics and participants.This allows enough time to discuss and plan for tricky issues,and the workshop becomes a forum to discuss and solve anyissues or conflicts arising within the community, and allowsspace for creative solutions to begin.

Conducting the trainingA minimum of ten people must attend a community-level

SPECIAL ISSU

E


Community-based animal health training and creative change in Bolivia 10

training, with no more than 20 participants in any onesession, so that everyone can have a chance to practice onanimals. Villagers supply food for the trainers, a place to stay,and animals for the practice sessions. The training is notlinked to any other benefits or services.

Since women are the primary livestock caretakers in allthe areas we work in (men do farming), we design the basictraining for preliterate women – although many men laterparticipate. All basic community-level training is in the firstlanguage of the villagers. Because the training is for thepeople who actually care for the animals, we have foundthere to be dramatic improvements in livestock health andproduction. For example, when work began in the BrechaCasarave of San Julian there was a serious and disseminatedproblem with iodine deficiency in the livestock, causing birthand weaning rates to be very low, and the poor develop-ment of most calves. During training, women learnt simpleways to prevent this problem using locally availableresources. Within two years of the initiation of the commu-nity-level training, the problem had disappeared in the zoneof the Brecha, and calving and weaning rates shot up.

Basic Premise 2If farm families have an understanding of some farmeconomics, and good income and nutrition from their live-stock, they will want to invest in the health and care of theirlivestock so that they keep producing a good income.

This is appropriate for the Bolivian context becauseincome was the highest motivator. In another context themotivation might be bride price or prestige. It is importantto discover the motivating factors and emphasise them asoften as possible in the training.

ApproachesFarm planning for the futureWork with farm families to plan their farm, to heal andregenerate the land, or to prevent degradation whileimproving livestock production. This includes seeing livestockas an integral part of the farm (rather than an isolatedproduct), for manure and nutrient redistribution, agro-forestry, zero grazing, public health concerns, and so on.Farm planning includes helping families to think throughwhat they want from their farm and for the future of theirchildren.

We have an exercise in the five-day community work-shop where people draw or create on the ground a groupfarm plan for an average land parcel at the beginning of theworkshop. Because swidden agriculture is prominent andlivestock are not seen as an integral part of the farm system,

the group will usually have a very traditional initial plan. Theydo it as a group because cooperative work is very commonin Bolivia. People can visualise a whole farm in a small areaand as they talk together they begin to get ideas from oneanother. During the workshop, farms are visited, and thewhole group discusses the conditions and planning. At theend of the workshop, as a synthesis tool, participants makea farm plan together again, with a new piece of land andthe new concepts they have learnt. They are encouraged tosee the concepts in action on the drawing or model, andmany go home to plan their own farm with their family.

Basic livestock economics Help farmers to understand the basic economics of a farmand the specific economics of livestock, for example,discussing the cost of vaccines versus the earnings fromhealthy animals.

Develop alternatives to intermediaries Work with farmers’ organisations to overcome middlemencharges, and to market livestock and livestock products. Inworkshops, unity and collective work aspects of local cultureare emphasised, and participants have opportunities todiscuss marketing and design creative solutions.

Basic Premise 3CAHWs are most valuable in the long term as an integralpart of a local organisation rather than only as an individualentrepreneur (it’s good if they are also an individual entre-preneur).

Why? Because with difficult tasks such as vaccinating alllivestock, testing, marketing, and communal pasturemanagement, the organisation helps and encourages theCAHW. And in the development of the organisation, theCAHW becomes a change agent and facilitator.

Approaches Build organisational capacity in livestock issuesHelp the local organisation build their capacity to deal withlivestock related issues. The organisation is where conflicts

“Because the training is for the people who actually care for theanimals, we have found there to bedramatic improvements in livestockhealth and production”

SPEC

IAL

ISSU

E


Susan E Stewart10

are resolved over things like fencing, paying for vaccines, andproperty destruction. Work with them on developingproblem solving and conflict resolution skills. The organisa-tion can organise the marketing of livestock and livestockproducts. Help them to plan together and be successful attheir projects and assist them in developing negotiation skills.

Enhance team, visioning, and planning skillsTeach the CAHWs and interested Farmer Trainers someorganisational capacity building skills, such as how to facili-tate visioning and planning processes, set values, implement,monitor, and evaluate projects, and how to write projectgrants, design a budget, and so on. Support the CAHWs asthey use these skills with their local organisations. Not everyCAHW will have the desire or capacity to facilitate theseprocesses. Work with those who do and encourage them inthe challenges they meet.

Establish commonly held organisational valuesHelp local organisations and CAHWs focus on commonlyheld values such as unity, honesty, and mutual encourage-ment, which are the spiritual core of the community. Whenthe members of the organisation have identified these values,people often revisit them to encourage one another. Valuesguide the decision-making of the local organisation. If theorganisation has decided they value having good land fortheir children’s children, then they may decide not to marketchemical fertilisers, or to market instead tree seedlings forwindbreaks, green manure, and erosion control. Workingwith the local organisation on their values encourages theCAHWs in their work.

Encourage linkages Help the local organisations to develop sound linkages to live-stock related government, non-government, and businessinterests. The organisation practices and builds their negoti-ation skills as they set up working relationships with vet medi-cine suppliers, regional livestock associations, governmentregulatory agencies, veterinary laboratory services, and veteri-narians in the area.

What are the results of this work with CAHWs? Long term service providersIn the San Julian Zone in Bolivia, after PROPECO finished,women and men Farmer Trainers and CAHWs formed theirown local training and livestock health organisation. SinceBolivia’s Popular Participation Law was passed in 1997,government development funds have been decentralised toregional administrative areas. Thus, the mayor of the San

Julian area has funds to develop livestock and agricultureproduction. The organisation of Farmer Trainers and CAHWshave written project proposals, negotiated with their localgovernment, and are now handling most of the livestock careissues for their region encompassing about 6,000 families.They run training programmes, and help with the organisa-tion and implementation of vaccination, de-worming, andtesting campaigns in the zone. They are well liked andrespected, and are called on individually to provide animalhealth care services. There are no veterinarians to serve theirarea and yet the livestock health and production has greatlyimproved.

In the Brecha Casarave region, the incidence of Brucel-losis in cattle was unusually high when PROPECO began.Training for all farmers included understanding the diseaseand it’s prevention, and the local associations, CAHWs, andtrainers’ organisations have worked on a testing and eradi-cation programme. By 2001, disease incidence levels haddropped well below comparative levels in other lowland areasin Bolivia. According to monitoring by the Bolivian NationalEpidemiological Organisation, the same has happened withFoot and Mouth disease. In project evaluations it is commonfor the women to remark, ‘We wanted to have trainingabout our sheep because we wanted to treat their sicknesses.But when we started to practice all we had learnt in theworkshop, our sheep did not get sick’. Because of improvedanimal nutrition, vaccination, and de-worming, commonproblems such as diarrhoea have dramatically decreased.

Effective change agentsThe Farmer Trainers have all become important changeagents in their communities as a result of the training theyreceived in leadership, facilitation, and community organisa-tion and capacity building. Never before were women votedinto office in community organisations. Now the womentrainers regularly hold elected posts and accomplish signifi-cant change in their villages.

Confidence to negotiate Communities who have learnt how to manage their livestockhave the confidence to negotiate with government andNGOs. A large government project wanted to give farmersloans to bulldoze shallow ponds to provide dry season waterfor the livestock. Since they had discussed water in the basiclevel training workshops, community members knew theseponds would be very contaminated and would becomeempty in the dry season. So they negotiated with the govern-ment for the same loan funds to build wells for each farm.They received the loans and helped one another to dig and

SPECIAL ISSU

E


Community-based animal health training and creative change in Bolivia 10

protect the wells and to use locally appropriate pumps andcoverings. Now their livestock have clean water all yearround.

Marketing initiatives With improved livestock production comes the need forimproved marketing. Because trainers worked with all theinterested people in the villages and the CAHWs worked withthe local organisations, they have had some success inmarketing together. For example, a village called Las Gamasmarkets milk and yoghurt in the village, in outlying commu-nities, and in the city.

Responsiveness to change Some of the villages have found cohesiveness around theirlivestock production. When one village had to abandon theirfarms because a large river changed course in the Berlin zone,they decided to move together to another location. This wasvery unusual because the families were not related to oneanother and normally would have gone separate ways. Theirlivestock walked out with them and provided the financialbacking for their new start. Within a short time, they hadbuilt houses for everyone, a new school for the children, had

healthcare through a clinic, and a clean water supply. Muchof this success was due to the cohesiveness of their villageorganisation, which had formed around livestock production,but was flexible enough to transform to this new situation.A former Farmer Trainer of animal health care training andthe CAHWs became the leaders of this new organisation.With the confidence they had gained through training facil-itation, and their skills in negotiation and organisationmanagement, they were able to transform devastation intoopportunity.

Conclusion Livestock are integrated into the fabric and rhythm of thelives of rural villagers in Bolivia. Livestock programmes shouldrecognise this and seek to build capacity into all of the areaswhich livestock and livestock production affect. Building onthe locally held values or spiritual core of the organisationwith Farmer Trainers and CAHWs as change agents, whilestrengthening the physical core via livestock health andproduction improvement, could be a key to a holisticapproach which broadly empowers communities as diseaseis controlled and they improve livestock production and theirlivelihoods.

ABOUT THE AUTHORSusan E Stewart, World Concern Myanmar,37/1 Soi 15 Phetburi Road, Bangkok 10400,Thailand.Email: [email protected]

NOTESCurrently senior technical advisor for WorldConcern Myanmar, Susan Stewart is a veteri-narian and organisation development special-ist. She worked with Christian VeterinaryMission in Bolivia from 1988 to 1997. For more information on designing aprogramme and participatory techniques seeLearning Together, The Agricultural WorkersParticipatory Sourcebook by Susan Stewartwith Karen Stoufer, Jennifer Shoemaker, andBJ Linquist. Available through Heifer ProjectInternational, PO Box 808, Little Rock, AR72203 USA, Tel: +1 800 422 0474Website:www.heifer.org

For guidance on local capacity building see TheCornerstones Model Values-Based Planningand Management by Jerry Aaker and JenniferShumaker. Also available through HeiferProject International.

GEN

ERA

L SE

CTIO

N


IntroductionThe Seed Health Improvement sub-Project (SHIP), whichoperates under the Poverty Elimination Through RiceResearch Assistance (PETRRA) project in Bangladesh, startedin 1999 and has mainly focused on seed cleaning, properdrying, and proper storing as three pillars to improve rice seedand seedling health. Activities have been undertaken in fourvillages in each of the seven agroecological zones. As SHIPbegan its fourth year, increased emphasis was put on howto improve scaling-up strategies. CABI Bioscience, as one ofproject partners, alongside the International Rice ResearchInstitute (IRRI), has been at the forefront of developing, vali-dating, and disseminating innovative discovery learning toolsand approaches to increase farmer participation in crop andpest management.

During a national workshop in April 2002, potentialuptake pathways were explored from the point of view ofthe national project partner organisations. These included theBangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI), the Rural Devel-opment Academy (RDA) at Bogra, and four different non-governmental organisations: CARE, PROSHIKA, BRAC, andGKF. Farmer-to-farmer extension and the use of local leadersand institutions were mentioned as important uptake path-ways, yet with no clear understanding as to how to proceed,and without information on the point of view of the end-

SummaryA new Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) tool called theInnovation Tree has been developed. It has helped people tovisualise and analyse the way in which an innovation isspread over time between community members. We foundit to be a very useful tool, both to distinguish between inno-vators, and early and late adopters, but also as a way ofhelping both outsiders and the community to understandsome of the social and psychological dimensions that influ-ence the adoption and diffusion of an innovation within thatcommunity. The Innovation Tree also enables you to investi-gate how different personalities or types of innovators playa different role in promoting the technology to theircolleagues, which is of direct relevance for developingfarmer-to-farmer extension activities. The ‘type one’ inno-vator can inspire a wide range of people from different levelswithin a community and has a modest, mild, and inquiringcharacter. Type one innovators can easily engage in farmer-to-farmer knowledge strengthening, both within andoutside the community. The ‘type two’ innovator enthusesfewer and mainly like-minded people within the community,and has a strongly competitive character. These innovatorsare more eager to go outside the community to promotethe technology, rather than getting engaged in educationalactivities.

by PAUL VAN MELE and A.K.M. ZAKARIA

The Innovation Tree: a newPRA tool to reveal theinnovation adoption anddiffusion process

11

GEN

ERAL SECTIO

N


The Innovation Tree: a new PRA tool to reveal the innovation adoption and diffusion process 11

users. The following illustrates how the community in Mariavillage, Bogra, expressed their point of view and expertise,after using the new PRA tool to analyse their own innovationadoption and diffusion process. Adoption is considered asthe individual dimension of the process: individual house-holds will refuse or adopt an innovation for various reasons,while diffusion is the next step explaining how and why (orwhy not) the adoption spreads between individual house-holds.

Stimulating innovationIn Maria village, the key site for SHIP activities implementedby RDA, multipurpose seed drying tables were developed ina participatory way by stimulating people’s creativity. Peoplein Bangladesh traditionally dry their rice seed on the floor oron bamboo mats, also called chatai. The introduction of tubewells and new rice varieties over the past ten or so yearsenabled a lot of farmers to grow a second rice crop duringthe dry season. However, properly drying this boro seed hasbecome one of the major bottlenecks, because it is harvestedat the onset of the rainy season.

As post-harvest activities are mainly the responsibility ofwomen, we organised a learning session with mainly thewomen of the 30 participating households. To ensure fullownership, the concept of improved drying was introducedthrough a visualisation and reflection session on physicalprocesses such as ventilation and evaporation, rather than by

showing a ready-made drying table and trying to get peopleto adapt it to their own needs and means. A limited numberof questions, embedded in real-world situations, were devel-oped to stimulate the thinking process, and by the end ofthis two-hour session, all agreed upon useful criteria formaking seed drying platforms or tables.

In a next session these criteria were further discussed withboth husbands and wives, and the participants developed amonitoring sheet. We transferred this to an A4 sheet. Allhouseholds received a copy and were asked to record thedate at which they would make their table. It was made clearfrom the early onset that if they wished to make one, itwould be at their own expense.

Within a period of only five months all the 30 householdsengaged in the project had adopted the idea of this tech-nology, each bringing in their own innovations. More than60% of the multipurpose drying tables were designed andmade after close consultation between husband and wife.Personal observations and informal talks also revealed animportant exchange of ideas between households. Wewished to know how could we find out how people withinthe community inspired one another, and what could weactually learn from this?

Why analyse the innovation diffusion process?We believe that visualising the innovation diffusion processcould help:

Photo 1. Participantsfrom Maria village lineup in two rows, one forthe light and one forthe heavy tables

Photo 2. After having placedtheir cards in chronological orderof adopting the innovation, oneby one they explain who or whatinspired them to do this

GEN

ERA

L SE

CTIO

N


Paul Van Mele and A.K.M. Zakaria11

• provoke community reflection and raise awareness aboutthe dynamics of the process;

• provide insights into the social and psychological dimen-sions underlying the innovation diffusion process; and,

• identify which people, or more specifically, which person-alities, to engage in a particular farmer-to-farmer extensionactivity.

A better understanding of the innovation diffusionprocess could help outsiders to better target their commu-nity innovation activities. Secondly, it is generally agreed uponthat, for the selection of extension workers, not only thetechnical but also the facilitation skills are important criteria.This is equally important when selecting farmer facilitators,and as such we have looked for a way to gather insights inthe underlying social and psychological dimensions of theinnovation adoption and diffusion process. As far as we wereaware, no PRA tool existed to visualise such a process andencompass some of these factors.

Flexibility and creativity are key factors in participatoryapproaches. Through brainstorming we ended up with theInnovation Tree, in which ideas from a flow chart and amethod to identify indigenous specialists have been adjustedand combined.

MaterialsEach household needs a card about half an A4-size, andthere should be enough markers. The session is best held inan open space in the village, but could also been doneindoors presuming a large enough floor or wall can be found.Lines can be drawn with either a stick in the sand, or withcrayons on harder surfaces.

How it works• Invite those households who have adopted or adapted a

technology for a meeting, brief them about the objective ofthe exercise, and provide cards and markers.

• Ask them to write their name on the card, along with thedate on which they adopted the technology. The fact thatthey have recorded this date on their monitoring sheet mayhelp at this point. If the illiteracy rate is high, pictures of theparticipating households can be used instead of writtennames.

• Explore with the participants whether the technology couldbe classified into broad groups. In our case, for instance,the participants clearly distinguished two broad classes ofdrying tables, namely light ones and heavy ones.

• Draw one line for each group, leaving ample spacebetween each line. The length of the lines depends on thenumber of participants, and whether you do it indoors oroutdoors. In the open you should allow for at least half ametre per household.

• Ask the participants to bring their cards and place them onthe line according to which broad group they belong to(photo 1).

• Ask them to re-arrange themselves according to the dateat which they have adopted the innovation. At completion,innovators should be at one end, while late adopters shouldbe at the other. After having laid their card on the line, theycan go back to the group.

• The person or household who first made the innovation isasked to take the floor and explain who or what inspiredthem to do this (photo 2). One facilitator guides theprocess, while another records all the comments.

• Consequently, and in chronological order, all the others areasked to draw one or several lines to cards of householdswho inspired them to also adopt the idea of the innova-tion, while adapting it to their personal needs and limita-tions. Lines can be drawn within or between groups

Photo 3. Hamidaindicates whoinspired her toadopt theinnovation

Photo 4.Zabed Aliindicateswho inspiredhim

GEN

ERAL SECTIO

N


The Innovation Tree: a new PRA tool to reveal the innovation adoption and diffusion process 11

(photos 3 and 4). The facilitator tries to find out whatexactly convinced them to do it, and what other thanpersonal factors were involved in the decision-makingprocess. Although subtlety is the master of the facilitator,the underlying question is ‘Why was household x a sourceof inspiration and not household y, while both adopted theinnovation before you did?’. Preferably a third facilitatorsimultaneously copies the name cards and lines on a sheetfor later processing (figure 1).

• The last part of the exercise is the most important one, asthis is the time to facilitate group discussion and stimulatereflection. The first step in the discussion should deal withthe innovation process itself, and depending on the objec-tive, focus more on either the technical, economic, social,or psychological dimensions.

• During the last part of the discussion the facilitator tries todraw on the insights gained from the exercise, and exploreswho could contribute in which way to scaling-up the inno-vation diffusion process.

Revealing social and psychological factorsFarmer decision-making in adopting a technology is influ-enced by institutional, economic, cultural, social, and psycho-logical characteristics. A whole range of anthropological andsocial tools exists to reveal mainly the first three categories.The social and psychological factors enhancing or inhibitingthe actual adoption can be analysed directly with thecommunity through the Innovation Tree. As these factors areoften location- and technology-specific, a list of factors isgiven in Table 1 based on a literature review and personalexperience.

The above factors partly determine whether a technol-ogy is adopted or not, but the Innovation Tree exercise hasalso enabled us to investigate how different personalities ortypes of innovators play a different role in promoting the1 The presence of the project and visits of international staff contributed to certainpeople being eager to make a good impression.

Social factors Psychological factorsStimulating adoption Inhibiting adoption Stimulating adoption Inhibiting adoption

Personal communication network* Opposition in the farming community Innovation proneness* Complexity of technologySocial participation* Social isolation Risk taking ability Risk avoidanceExternal pressure*1 Poverty Extrovert* High level of stressCommon need for solving a problem Overall knowledge Lack of knowledge about the

technologySelf fulfilment* Lack of motivationPride in ownership* Mistrust of project staffLevel of aspiration

Table 1. Some social and psychological characteristics influencing the innovation adoption process.Factors identified in our project by applying the Innovation Tree are indicated by an *

Type 1 Innovator Type 2 Innovator

Main interest Knowledge Technology

Personality Modest, mild, and inquiring Competitive

Social interaction Intense Limited to like-minded people

Potential contribution Action learning Technology to extension promotion

Table 2: Profiles of two types of innovators as identifiedin the Seed Health Improvement sub-Project, Bangladesh

Figure 1: Example of the Innovation Tree transferred topaper. Note that participants decided to distinguishbetween two broad groups of innovations in this case:light and heavy multipurpose drying tables

ABDUL12.05

ALEPA18.06

ISNAD10.05

ABOUR20.05

OSMAN21.06

ALTAB10.07

DULU14.07

ALI18.08

NASMA21.09

PARUL15.10

ZABED23.12

ANISA07.07

SALIM12.07

BABLU15.07

HAMIDA10.09

HELENA02.10

GEN

ERA

L SE

CTIO

N


Paul Van Mele and A.K.M. Zakaria11

technology to their colleagues. We have identified two typesof innovators (Table 2).

The first type of innovator has inspired a wide range ofpeople from different levels within a community and has amodest, mild, and inquiring character. This innovator hasenthusiastically engaged in farmer-to-farmer knowledgestrengthening of seed health management, both within andoutside the community. The second type has enthused fewerand mainly like-minded people within the community, andhas a strongly competitive character. This innovator has beenmore eager to go outside the community to promote thetechnology based on his innovation, rather than gettingengaged in education activities.

ConclusionsAlthough the Innovation Tree has so far only been used on asmall-scale in a few villages and with a focus on a techno-logical innovation, it can be applied with any type of inno-vation, whether triggered by a project, a workshop, or anyother communication channel.

As illustrated above, we believe the Innovation Tree is auseful tool to distinguish between different types of innova-tors, but also to better understand the psychological andsocial dimensions underpinning the decision-making process,which would be difficult to disclose in other ways. This mayyield valuable information about which people or, more

broadly, personalities (and even institutions) to engage in aparticular scaling-up activity.

However, as with any PRA tool, none can stand ‘on itsown’ and therefore we stress the need to complement thistool with other PRA tools or techniques such as semi-struc-tured interviews and personal observations. The tool mayneed to be modified to take account of the different adap-tations made to the innovation by the different participants.

And last but not least, it is important to realise that theoutput from the discussion following this PRA exercise goesmuch further than the actual innovation, adoption and diffu-sion process. Indeed, as is often the case, discussion topicsquickly evolve towards social development issues and howcommunity members see their role in this process.

“We believe the Innovation Tree is auseful tool to distinguish betweendifferent types of innovators, but also tobetter understand the psychological andsocial dimensions underpinning thedecision-making process, which wouldbe difficult to disclose in other ways”

ABOUT THE AUTHORSPaul Van Mele, CABI Bioscience, Bakeham Lane,Egham, Surrey TW20 9TY, UK.Email: [email protected]

A.K.M. Zakaria, Rural Development Academy,Bogra 5842, Bangladesh.Email: [email protected]

GEN

ERAL SECTIO

N


IntroductionSave the Children (UK) worked in Morocco for almost 40years and for most of that time concentrated on the area ofdisability. Like many programmes elsewhere the organisationbegan its work as a response to an emergency. In the case ofMorocco this arose out of two events. The first was the earth-quake in Agadir, which devastated the southern coastal cityin 1960 leaving thousands dead and many children orphanedand homeless. The second emergency arose out of theconsumption of contaminated cooking oil in the Fez andMeknes area of northern Morocco in 1959 and 1960. Some10,000 adults and children were left paralysed, resulting inappeals for assistance by the Moroccan authorities to exter-nal agencies and well wishers.

In later years, the principal intervention supported by Savethe Children consisted in the establishment and support of amajor residential institution for physically disabled children inthe northern town of Khemisset. One of the first of its kindin Morocco, the school became one of the organisation’s‘flagship’ projects. It was shown off to visiting royalty, to localand international dignitaries at every opportunity, and at itsheight consumed the vast proportion of the organisation'sbudget for the entire Morocco programme. Claimed one ofits former expatriate staff:

I have been approached by many people, both Moroc-

can and English, who would dearly like to preserve theschool in the form that the director created it and ran it fora quarter of a century. It was regarded by many as a bit of‘Best of British’ in a foreign land and a wonderful exampleof our aid to a developing country.

Issues around sustainability and institutionalisationThe last sentence is revealing. In many ways the Save theChildren programme in Morocco consisted in exporting amodel of service provision relevant for the UK, to a locationwhere the value of such a project was neither questionednor investigated. Some of these tensions were to surface inlater years, prompting the organisation to rethink its strat-egy, but not without leaving a certain amount of resentmentand confusion behind.

One issue that arose was related to the problem of costand sustainability. The kind of investment in staff and infra-structure reached a level of expenditure that could never beassumed by the local Moroccan authorities. At the same timesome critics also questioned the spread of benefits gener-ated from such a massive expenditure, relative to the smallnumbers of children who actually passed through the estab-lishment. Claimed one programme officer:

Such a facility could only cater for an extremely smallnumber of disabled children in the country, a maximum of 120

by CHRIS MCIVOR

In our own words:investigating disabilityin Morocco

12

GEN

ERA

L SE

CTIO

N


Chris McIvor12

people at any one time with an average intake of only 20 chil-dren per year. At the same time children who were blind, deafor had learning disabilities were not even considered by theadmissions board which regulated the school intake.

It was also claimed that, as with establishments elsewhere,many of the children who passed through this residential facil-ity became ‘institutionalised’, separated from their communi-ties and families to such an extent that their later reintegrationproved difficult. Some of the previous residents of the schoolcomplained of over-protective attitudes among its manage-ment and staff, an approach that reinforced their perceptionof difference to other children and made them feel that theywere somehow ‘apart’. When some of these children werelater reintegrated into the ordinary school system they werenot prepared for the hardships and ridicule among otherpupils that sometimes accompanied this transition.

Our right to be heardAt the core of much of Save the Children’s programme inMorocco for many of the 40 years it worked in the country,lay the fact that when designing its strategies andprogrammes in the area of disability it made little attempt toinvolve anyone but the expatriate professionals who thoughtthey knew best about the interests of the constituency theywere supposed to be helping. Even the later ‘indigenisation’of the programme, the involvement in management deci-sions by local Moroccan staff, did not genuinely encompassthe views, wishes, and opinions of disabled people them-selves. While many of the interventions were well meaning,disabled people and their families were regarded for manyyears as project beneficiaries, as recipients of well meaningcharity but not as partners in the process of identifying whatwould best assist them.

This inability or unwillingness to listen to disabled peopleis not an issue that was specific to Save the Children in itsMorocco programme. The charitable models of care andprotection that characterise much of the response to disabledpeople’s needs in many parts of the world have only relativelyrecently been questioned by disabled people themselves. Aswith issues affecting children, for example, organisations arebeing challenged to adopt a more participatory, rights basedapproach to programming. The issue of equal treatment,social integration, improved access to services, respect forissues of difference is replacing a previous discourse largelyframed in terms of charity and welfare.

Investigating disabilityThe realisation that both Save the Children, as well as severalof our partners in key support ministries, remained ignorant

about much of what faced disabled people in Moroccoprompted the organisation to undertake a participatory studyin the country in 1995. One of its key objectives was toensure the genuine and meaningful inclusion of disabledpeople themselves in the research exercise so that a moreaccurate picture of their lives could help inform the futuredevelopment and management of programmes.

An editorial team comprising Save the Children staff andseveral disabled people who represented different organisa-tions, was formed that year to undertake the research andcarry out interviews. Arising from this investigation, a publi-cation in both English and Arabic was produced entitled InOur Own Words. The rest of this essay will focus on some ofthe issues raised during this process of consultation, and inparticular the lessons learned from a programme of researchthat sought to include disabled people in the identification ofthe problems that affected them and the solutions theyproposed.

Lessons learntRepresentationOne of the first issues to surface among the team of peopleselected to carry out the research and produce the publication,was the issue of representation. The disabled people in theeditorial committee were identified through a number ofindigenous Moroccan organisations set up to support the inter-ests of their particular constituency. Yet it was clear that acertain elitism characterised many of these organisations, andthat the focus on the particular disability that characterisedtheir membership had left a whole range of other factors, suchas poverty, gender, ethnicity etc., unaccounted for.

This meant that the original text submitted by severalmembers of the research/editorial team failed to adequatelyrepresent the priorities of a large number of disabled peoplein Morocco. There was very little written, for example, onwhat difficulties were encountered within poor families, orwhat unique set of issues disabled women might face. Aconscious effort, therefore, had to be made to spread the netof consultation much wider. A mechanism of communica-tion also had to be developed whereby disabled people, whowere illiterate, unemployed, less articulate etc., could havetheir concerns represented.

One issue that proved to be particularly contentiouswithin the Moroccan context was the issue of how existinggender bias and discrimination added to the burden imposedon disabled women. The inclusion of this dimension withinthe study fuelled concern among some that the research wasstraying beyond its original mandate, and that in challeng-ing the gender stereotypes prevalent in Moroccan society the

GEN

ERAL SECTIO

N


In our own words: investigating disability in Morocco 12

publication might prompt a negative response that wouldreduce the impact of its focus on disability. But in the end thedecision was made that an investigation of the stigmasurrounding disability could not be divorced from a range ofother prejudices and factors that confronted disabled indi-viduals in their social context. Claimed a disabled womanfrom Rabat:

We are not saying that ours is the only problem. Bothwomen and disabled people in general encounter difficultiesand discrimination. But join the two issues together and youmagnify the difficulty. Disabled women have a unique set ofproblems, which demand a unique set of responses.

Hierarchies of acceptance A second related problem around the issue of representationalso surfaced in the course of the study. It became clear thatin Morocco there was a kind of ‘hierarchy’ of acceptancerelating to disabled people that was evident within disabledpeople's organisations themselves. At the top of the ladder,those who were physically impaired found it easier to gainacceptance from their families and communities. Those whohad visual and hearing impairments found it more difficult,while those with learning and mental disabilities seemed toexperience the worst rejection and discrimination, not onlyfrom so called ‘normal’ society but from other disabledpeople themselves.

Again, this was reflected in the initial study by a heavyfocus on the problems facing physically disabled people. Theviews and opinions of those with visual and hearing impair-ments were rarely included. A decision had to be made toensure that the research was inclusive of as wide a range ofdisabilities as possible.

This issue is common to other kinds of research focusedaround problems of discrimination. In the field of gender orchildhood, for example, it is sometimes assumed that thesecategories define a unique set of problems that can bedivorced from other sets of issues. Yet women and childrenbelong to class, economic, and ethnic structures that can inturn create other kinds of bias that need to be acknowledgedif either research or subsequent action aims to be truly repre-sentative of a wide range of opinions.

Considerable work, therefore, had to be done with theresearch team to alert them to the fact that many of theviews expressed in the original study, had been solicited fromkey informants who largely had the same problems, back-grounds, and level of articulacy as themselves. While the finaltext reversed some of this original bias, in general the Moroc-can study and subsequent publication inadequatelyaddressed the issue of ensuring equitable recognition of the

problems facing different sectors of the disabled community.While members of the research team were instructed to inter-view people with as wide a range of disabilities as possible,the tools used to gather this information were too blunt andinsensitive to accommodate those people who throughvisual, hearing, or learning impairments could not adequatelycommunicate during direct interviews.

In discussions with groups of disabled children, forexample, only those more articulate, assertive individualsspoke out, leaving a large section of other children’s viewsand preoccupations ignored. The use of drawings, personaldiaries, drama, and role-plays would have provided a moreinteractive and relaxed fora for bringing another set of viewsto the table. Claimed one member of the research team:

On reflection more and broader training on differenttechniques and styles of communication for all those involvedwith the gathering of information, might have helped toensure that a wider cross section of disabled people wouldhave had their opinions registered.

Establishing trust The original research schedule had envisaged a time span ofseveral months to complete the interviews and focus groupdiscussions, so that enough material could be generated toproduce a publication useful for advocacy and programmingpurposes. Yet in the end it took much longer, partly becausethe time and effort required in carrying out a meaningfulconsultation and establishing the trust of people who hadnever been consulted before took longer than expected.

There was scepticism among many of the disabled peopleconsulted, as to why they were being asked their opinions.Would the political authorities view their criticism as a sign ofdisloyalty to the Moroccan state? In recent years, the state hadstrongly and publicly expressed its commitment to socialjustice, improved welfare provision and integration of disabledpeople into Moroccan society. Several disabled children whoderived a living from begging were worried about sharingtheir views, since they were already harassed by the authori-ties for conducting an activity that might negatively impact on

“While many of the interventions werewell meaning, disabled people and theirfamilies were regarded for many years asrecipients of well meaning charity butnot as partners in the process ofidentifying what would best assist them”

GEN

ERA

L SE

CTIO

N


Chris McIvor12

the image the country wanted to project to Western tourists. From those disabled children who had benefited from insti-

tutional care, like that offered by the Khemisset School, therewas concern that they might lose their scholarships if they wereseen ‘to bite the hand that fed them’. In the end a significantamount of time had to be taken to win the trust of people,many of whom claimed that this was the first time their viewshad ever been solicited, and to reassure them that their opin-ions would be registered anonymously if they so wished.

One consistent question recurred throughout the discus-sions with disabled people, namely what would happen as aresult of this exercise? Would better services be provided?Would aids and appliances now be readily available? Wouldaccess to buildings be improved? Several informants indi-cated that this was not the first time research and studies hadbeen conducted, and that they had seen very little evidenceof an improvement as a result of the previous exercises.

Minimising unrealistic expectations in the context of anyresearch is always problematic, and the answer to how this isbest done is never an easy one. At a time when Save the Chil-dren was moving away from direct provision of disability serv-ices towards handing over its programme to local authorities,no guarantees could be provided that the views of disabledpeople would be listened to and respected. The only argumentwe could offer was that we hoped that disabled people’s voicesmight promote change and more acceptance of their needs inMoroccan society, but that in the end this would depend onpolicy makers and structures outside our direct control.

ConclusionTowards the end of 1995 In Our Own Words was publishedin Morocco, and subsequently translated into Arabic anddistributed throughout the Middle East. The reactions werevaried. Several ministries responsible for disability provisionin the country found it too critical and unappreciative of thework carried out on behalf of disabled people in theircountry. In particular the language of rights and obligationsseemed unwelcome to some, who felt that disabled peoplewere now being ungrateful to those who had tried to helpthem in the past.

The response of several former residents of Khemisset

School was also negative. Having benefited considerably fromthe opportunities for schooling and other assistance providedby the establishment, they found some of the criticisms raisedabout sustainability, lack of community involvement, issuesaround institutionalisation of residents etc. offensive to thememory of its original founder. Yet others were more accom-modating of the criticisms offered, indicating that while theyhad personally benefited from the time they had spent in thisestablishment, there was no escaping the fact that theexpenses incurred in running such a facility could have beenextended to a much wider net of beneficiaries if morecommunity based programmes had been developed.

Finally, one set of comments was received that could beinterpreted as either criticism or commendation. Somereaders complained that they were surprised and disap-pointed that no uniform view had emerged from the researchand subsequent publication, and that it was full of contra-dictory and conflicting voices from which a single, coherentview would be hard to derive. Yet in many ways this confu-sion of voices represented for others one of the strengths ofthe publication. It indicated that the editorial team hadgenuinely sought to listen to what was being said and hadtransmitted the voices of disabled people in as honest andtruthful a manner as possible. At the same time it delivereda clear message, namely that there are no easy solutionsavailable, that the issue of discrimination against disabledpeople is a complex subject that is intolerant of uniform andsimple solutions.

ABOUT THE AUTHORChris McIvor,Save the Children Fund (UK),PO Box 4689, Harare, Zimbabwe.NOTESChris McIvor was Programme Director for Savethe Children (UK) in Morocco for three years.Subsequent to working in Morocco he occu-pied the same posts in both the Caribbean andZimbabwe, where he is currently located.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSChris McIvor edited and contributed to thepublication In Our Own Words – Disability andIntegration in Morocco. Contributing authorsalso include Joan Carey, Save the Children (UK)disability advisor; Khadija Sabil, a Moroccanjournalist; Fatima Lemrini, a disabled Moroccanactivist; and several disabled people contributeda chapter entitled ‘In Our Own Words’, which isa collation of their experiences as disabled

people in Moroccan society. The book has beenpublished in both English and Arabic. Allquotes are taken from the publication.REFERENCESColeridge, P. (1993) Disability, Liberation andDevelopment. Oxfam, UK.McIvor, C. (Eds). (1995). In Our Own Words –Disability and Integration in Morocco. Save theChildren (UK).

“One consistent question recurredthroughout the discussions withdisabled people, namely what wouldhappen as a result of this exercise?Would better services be provided?Would aids and appliances now bereadily available? Would access tobuildings be improved?”

GEN

ERAL SECTIO

N


IntroductionLocal government in Colombia has come a long way inpromoting environmental awareness and citizen and institu-tional participation in local sustainable development planningprocesses. There are several valuable experiences underway,namely Local Agenda 21s, Local Environmental Action Plansand innovative Sustainable Development Observatories.

In practice, organising local government, other local insti-tutions, and citizens in the promotion of integrated manage-ment required for sustainable development is not easy. Infact, technical staff in charge of designing citywide planswere unable to fully engage the community. For this reason,new methods of coordinating with the community weredeveloped. User-friendly information and monitoring systemsin the municipalities have become a new and effectivemethodological tool for local sustainable development. Citi-zens have been more attracted to public life and motivatedto engage in improving the quality of life of their street,neighbourhood, town, city, and municipality once they havetaken part in the processing of updated and accurate infor-mation that affects their lives.

The Sustainable Development Observatories in Maniza-les, Colombia are an example of shared management andcitizen participation in local sustainable development. In prac-tice, the successful development of the Observatories has

been due to the active participation of the city municipality,universities, trade unions, institutions, non-governmentalorganisations (NGOs), and community organisations. Thetechnological, economic, and information support they haveprovided have been essential to the advancement of theproject. This support has undoubtedly enabled many of theeconomic, social, and environmental programmes and proj-ects in Manizales to be carried out.

The observatories in Manizales are basically a monitoringsystem designed as a support system for local urban gover-nance. Their main features are regularly updated economic,social, and environmental indicators formulated with citizenparticipation and updated by technical support staff. Theyare available to citizens, who are encouraged to permanentlyevaluate the achievements of the social, economic, and envi-ronmental programmes and projects carried out by theMunicipal Development Plan, and participate in its monitor-ing and implementation. In this way, the information that theuniversity and research centres produce about the munici-pality is easily transmitted to the community through user-friendly methods, especially the project’s most visible andappealing feature, the Quality of Life Traffic Lights.

These Quality of Life Traffic Lights are located in strategiclocations around the city, in order to raise awareness andinterest in the Local Environmental Action Plans and motivate

by LUZ ESTELA VELÁSQUEZ, translated by KIMBERLY VILAR

Sustainable DevelopmentObservatories in Manizales,Colombia

13

GEN

ERA

L SE

CTIO

N


Luz Estela Velásquez, translated by Kimberly Vilar13

citizens to take part in their ongoing monitoring process. Theelectronic billboards display the quality of social, economic,and environmental indicators for the city's eleven districts orneighbourhoods, under a familiar, distinctly urban symbol(traffic lights) and colour scheme (green, yellow and red).

Objectives The Sustainable Development Observatories in the Manizalesmunicipality aim to fulfil the following specific objectives: • support sustainable development planning and manage-

ment with an information system, which pools economic,social, and environmental data;

• encourage the management and efforts of the localgovernment in fulfilling the policies of the DevelopmentPlan and facilitate the objective analysis of the indicatorresults in order to monitor and define ongoing programmesand projects;

• fittingly provide the required information on the citysustainable development performance for use in the plan-ning process;

• share knowledge with all sectors of the community bymeans of user-friendly Quality of Life Traffic Lights whichillustrate comprehensive indicators that accurately reflectthe city level of sustainable development;

• permanent monitoring of the programmes and projects ofthe Municipal Development Programme: the Biomanizales;

• increase the range of participation of the citizens in theprogrammes and projects according to the Local Agenda21: the Bioplan; and

• give priority to the shared urban management to coordi-nate and execute common interest projects in order tocreate a dynamic planning process and greater institutionalinvolvement.

Frequently asked questions and answersWhat is a Sustainable Development Observatory?The Observatories are the physical locations where thecommunity has access to social, economic and environmen-tal information. They are strategically located in high-densityand appealing places throughout the city so that local resi-dents can see them. In order to strengthen the communitymanagement capabilities needed to make good use of theObservatories, the universities are providing trainingprogrammes for community organisations, trade unions, andinstitutions. Furthermore, environmental education sessionsare carried out in the Observatories themselves.

Who manages and administrates the Observatories? The municipal government is the essential leader of the

project. Additionally, government authorities have providedtechnical, human, and financial resources for the manage-ment of the Observatories. However, the strong precedentof shared leadership between the municipality and theuniversity in Manizales has allowed for joint governance.

Who designed the Observatories system?The system was designed by a technical team of municipalemployees and researchers from the Environmental StudiesInstitute of the Colombian National University and the Inde-pendent University of Manizales, both acknowledged fortheir commitment to local sustainable development. TheEconomic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean(ECLAC) also technically assisted the design. As a test for thedesign the technical group implemented a prototypelaunched in the community awareness phase of the project.

Why is inter-institutional coordination vital for the runningof the Observatories?Consensus building between institutions is absolutely neces-sary for the implementation of the Observatories becauseimplementation is based on the information supplied by insti-tutions on national, regional, and local levels. By means of aformal agreement with the municipality, these partnerscommit to making economic, technical, and logistical contri-butions. However, local government leadership is inherentlyfundamental to the signing of Cooperation Conventionmeetings.

How do Observatories seek to promote participatorycitizenship education?By increasing local citizen knowledge about city economic,social, and environmental conditions, the Observatories seekto increase citizen interest and engagement in the MunicipalDevelopment Plan’s promotion of sustainable developmentprojects and programmes. By promoting active study groups

“The Observatories in Manizales arebasically a monitoring system designedas a support system for local urbangovernance. Their main features areregularly updated economic, social, andenvironmental indicators formulated withcitizen participation and updated bytechnical support staff”

GEN

ERAL SECTIO

N


Sustainable Development Observatories in Manizales, Colombia 13

in each district and the participation of support committees,district action committees, local management committees,and the different economic sectors, trade unions, institutions,and NGOs, the citizen education projects are increasingcitizen participation. When the results of the quality of lifeindicators of the municipality, district, and neighbourhoodsare published, the Observatories become citizen participationvenues.

Who is leading the Observatories’ community educationprocess?The process is being led by the secretary of District Develop-ment and the Institute of Municipal Training, with thesupport of the universities registered in the BiomanizalesCooperation Convention. Some experienced NGOs that workin the various district-specific population participationprogrammes are also involved.

How do the indicators reach people?The system is made up of factors, variables, and indicatorsthat will be processed by sophisticated computer softwarespecially designed for the project. The design includes a setof technical tools that will allow for speedy adjustments toindicators and their periodic evaluation, as well as conven-ient monitoring of the most fundamental variables. Never-theless, the system has been especially geared to be equallyaccessible to the general population and specialists. Duringthe design process, indicators were selected in order tocompare the levels of sustainable development between citydistricts or communes, as well as between Colombian orother Latin America cities. Manizales citizens are now able totrack the qualitative changes in their commune and citythrough the electronic traffic lights as well as through indi-cator software set up at the observatory venues.

How will the quality of the municipality's sustainabledevelopment be displayed?The Quality of Life Traffic Light System developed by theNational University of Manizales will be used; the samesystem used by the municipality to make continuous envi-ronmental and social evaluations. Due to its simplicity, thismethodology has been employed in many other cities in thecountry.

Who is involved in the running of the Observatories?The involvement of the municipal government is crucial. Forthis reason it was incorporated into the Development Planproposals as a management tool. It is essential for the plan-ning offices of the municipality and corpocaldas, the support-

ing institutions, the trade unions, and the organised commu-nity to commit themselves according to their interests andcapabilities. In this way, it is absolutely necessary that duringthe process only those groups that will support the localgovernment leadership in the objective evaluation of theprogrammes and projects and those that will supply appro-priate information for the analysis of the indicators bebrought together.

Who will support the running of the Observatories?Initially, the necessary financial resources will be allocated fromthe municipality's budget, although specific projects andprogrammes will need backing from other local, regional, andnational resources, as well as international technical assis-tance. Likewise, it is vital to quantify the technical potentialand human resources available in the municipality, as well asthe information resources they provide. Currently, the NationalUniversity, the Independent University, the Ministry of Envi-ronment, and Economic Commission for Latin America andthe Caribbean (ECLAC) have agreed to participate.

Understanding the political culture of the participatingpopulation.It is important to note that political action taken by the urbanpopulation should reaffirm their leading role in the systemand their importance in the local community. At the sametime, comprehensive work must be carried out in order forthe municipal Development Plans to serve as tools to consol-idate a political culture associated with the participatingpopulation. Feasible projects and programmes that alsoencourage political participation and membership should beincorporated in the Observatories.

What is the role of the Area Council of Municipal Planning? The Area Council of Municipal Planning is the highest repre-sentative of civilian society in the shared planning processes,which is why its leadership is fundamental to the project.Here it is urged to form links with the Assembly and activelyparticipate in familiarising itself with the project.

What are the community leaders´ roles? Any real possibility of establishing permanent observatoriesgreatly depends on the role of the community in its runningof them. Due to the shared management of the observato-ries it is important to stress that the leaders of the commu-nity who have previously backed the increase in socialawareness of the Districts, are involved from the Familiarisa-tion Phase of the project onwards. Likewise, this phaseinvolves defining the appropriate participation mechanisms

GEN

ERA

L SE

CTIO

N


Luz Estela Velásquez, translated by Kimberly Vilar13

for the different members (the government, institutions, andcitizens).

Will there be monitoring and evaluation of theObservatories?The running of the Observatories must be evaluated, whichentails monitoring them with management indicators. Thisis a definitive phase for the objectives of the Observatories.In this sense, it is necessary to maintain up-to-date informa-tion on the municipality and continue permanent monitor-ing of its condition. At the same time any changes made inthe implementation of the Municipal Development Planshould be made as well as establishing indicators to allowbetter control of management processes that are promotedand developed with the technical cooperation of local,national, or international institutions.

The challenge: the permanent operation of theObservatoriesThe running of the Sustainable Development Observatories inManizales depends to a large extent on the way in whichpopulation participation is mobilised and how the communityrole is defined in the planning and leadership of the Munici-pal Development Plan´s programmes and projects. In thissense, it is clear that the role of local government institutionsin Manizales must be increased in order to develop theObservatories as an important part of a methodology thatcatalyses the total involvement of government institutionswith the population.

The permanent status of the Observatories and qualitativechanges in the long run is for the sustainability indicators toreveal if the quality of life in the municipality is increasing ordecreasing. They should also point out whether the munici-pal government (through the implementation of

programmes and projects) is meeting the current and futuredemands and desires of the population, in terms of resourceallocation. For this reason the Development Plan has the taskof integrating, in a more balanced way, economic, social, andenvironmentally beneficial programmes and projects, in orderto extensively increase the population's quality of life.

It is also important that complementary community train-ing be carried out simultaneously to allow for the Observa-tories´ optimum performance. Furthermore it is essential thatthe set of technical tools is included in the process to alloweasy adjustment of the indicators for convenient and efficientsustained evaluation.

Likewise, the number Observatories that the system cantolerate, not just from the technical point of view, but alsofrom the ability to inspire population participation, is key. It isalso important that the Observatories are accessible, user-friendly, and facilitate population participation in the short-and medium-term objectives of the Development Plan. In aprocess of permanent and participatory planning, thereshould be periodical control and monitoring of the more crit-ical areas in order to define, together with the community,comprehensive and concrete measures and planning.

ABOUT THE AUTHORLuz Estela Velásquez, IDEA: UniversidadNacional Manizales, Facultad de Arquitectura,‘El Cable’, Manizales, COLOMBIA.Email: [email protected] Vilar, IIED America Latina, Av. GeneralPaz 1180, Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, 1429, ARGENTINAEmail: [email protected]

BIBLIOGRAPHYVelásquez, L.S. (1998) ‘Agenda 21: a form ofjoint environmental management in Manizales,Colombia’. In D. Satterthwaite and J. Bicknell(Eds.), Environment and Urbanization: Sustain-able cities revisited, Vol. 10, No. 2, London:IIED.IDEA Universidad Nacional de Colombia SedeManizales – Municipio de Manizales. PlanSectorial Ambiental del Biomanizales. Bioplan1997-2000.Velásquez, L.S. (1997) ‘Sistema de monitoreo,seguimiento y control de la actuación del Plande Desarrollo Manizales Calidad Siglo XXI

Alcaldú de Manizales, Colombia’. DiscussionPaper. Proyecto gestión urbana en ciudadesintermedias seleccionadas de América Latina yel Caribe. Santiago de Chile: ComisiónEconómica para América Latina y el Caribe(CEPAL).Velásquez, L.S (2000) Estrategias einstrumentos de gestión urbana para eldesarrollo sostenible en América Latina y elCaribe. Observatorios para el DesarrolloSostenible del Municipio de Manizales –Colombia. Manizales: IDEA, CEPAL, UnitedNations, Municipio de Manizales.

“It is clear that the role of localgovernment institutions in Manizalesmust be increased in order to developthe Observatories as an important partof a methodology that catalyses thetotal involvement of governmentinstitutions with the population”

GEN

ERAL SECTIO

N


Introducción En Colombia, los municipios comienzan a promover la vincu-lación consciente de los ciudadanos e instituciones en losprocesos de planificación del desarrollo sostenible. LasAgendas Ambientales Locales articuladas a la Agenda Local21, Los Planes de Acción Ambiental Local y los Observato-rios, son los principales instrumentos con los que cuenta laciudadanía para la participación en este proceso.

En la práctica, existen dificultades para articular elgobierno local, las instituciones y los ciudadanos en el avancede la gestión integral requerida por el desarrollo sostenible yse reconoce que los técnicos que elaboran los planes noencuentran los métodos apropiados para vincular a la comu-nidad. Por esto, se plantea la necesidad de implementar enlos municipios sistemas de información y monitoreo de fácilcomprensión ciudadana, que sean parte integral de losnuevos instrumentos metodológicos requeridos para lagestión local del desarrollo sostenible. Si los ciudadanospueden participar en las fases de procesamiento de la infor-mación, y conocer sus resultados, llegarán mas fácilmente amotivarse para vincularse a programas y proyectos de mejo-ramiento de la calidad de vida de su calle, su barrio, sucomuna, su ciudad y su municipio.

Una experiencia que demuestra que existe la posibilidadde una gestión compartida y de amplia participación

ciudadana para el desarrollo sostenible local, es la de losObservatorios para el Desarrollo Sostenible del municipio deManizales. En la practica, el montaje de los Observatorios hasido posible gracias a que se ha logrado la participación delmunicipio, universidades, gremios, instituciones, organiza-ciones no gubernamentales (ONGs) y organizaciones comu-nitarias, su aporte con recursos técnicos, económicos y deinformación ha sido fundamental para el avance delproyecto. Sin duda alguna, esto es lo que ha permitido llevara cabo muchos de los programas y proyectos de mejo-ramiento económico, social y ambiental en Manizales.

Los Observatorios para el Desarrollo Sostenible del munici-pio de Manizales en Colombia, hacen parte del sistema demonitoreo propuesto como apoyo a la gestión urbana local.A partir de los resultados de indicadores económicos, socialesy ambientales, los ciudadanos pueden evaluar de formapermanente el desempeño de programas y proyectos sociales,económicos y ambientales del Plan de Desarrollo Municipal, yparticipar en su seguimiento y realización. Uno de los mayoresaportes de este proceso, ha sido posibilitar que la informacióncientífica y técnica que se produce sobre el municipio, en lasuniversidades y centros de investigación, se transmita a lacomunidad utilizando medios y códigos de fácil comprensión:Los Semáforos de Calidad de Vida.

Estos semáforos están ubicados estratégicamente dentro

by LUZ ESTELA VELÁSQUEZ

Los Observatorios para elDesarrollo Sostenibles enManizales, Colombia

14

GEN

ERA

L SE

CTIO

N


Luz Estela Velásquez14

de la ciudad, para concientizar e interesar a los ciudadanos enel seguimiento de los planes ambientales. Los carteles elec-trónicos muestran la calidad de los indicadores sociales,económicos y ambientales para las once comunas deManizale, a través de una escala de color netamente urbana:verde, amarillo o rojo.

Los Observatorios buscan cumplir los siguientesobjetivosLos Observatorios para el Desarrollo Sostenible del municipio deManizales se sustentan en los siguientes objetivos específicos:• apoyo al proceso de planificación gestión del desarrollo

sostenible del municipio con un sistema de información queintegra aspectos económicos, sociales y ambientales;

• apoyar de forma permanente la gestión y desempeño delgobierno municipal en el cumplimiento de las políticas delPlan de Desarrollo y posibilitar el análisis objetivo de resul-tados de indicadores para definir la continuidad de progra-mas y proyectos;

• suministrar oportunamente la información lógica que sobreel desarrollo sostenible del municipio se procesa en lasuniversidades, los centros de investigación, instituciones ydependencias del municipio para que repercuta en elproceso de planificación;

• socializar la información entre todos los sectores comuni-tarios a través de indicadores integrales que permitanconocer el estado del desarrollo sostenible del municipiocon códigos de fácil comprensión ciudadana a trabes de losSemáforos de Calidad de Vida;

• facilitar el suministro permanente de la información paraque esta trascienda con sus resultados a las comunidadesy ciudadanos e incida sobre la validación objetiva de laspolíticas, los programas y proyectos del Plan de Desarrollo;

• monitoreo permanente de los programas y proyectos delPlan de Desarrollo Municipal: El Biomanizales;

• incremento de la capacidad de participación de losciudadanos en los programas y proyectos de la AgendaLocal 21: El Bioplan;

• dar prioridad a la gestión urbana compartida para laconcertación y ejecución de proyectos de interés comúnpara generar un proceso de planificación dinámico y orien-tador de amplia participación institucional; y,

• los Observatorios deben ser lugares eficientes de trans-misión de información sobre el desarrollo sostenible munic-ipal y de apoyo para la comunicación entre el gobierno localy la ciudadanía.

¿Que es un Observatorio para el Desarrollo Sostenible? El Observatorio es el espacio donde se conoce, se propone y

se evalúa a través del resultado de indicadores, la gestión yplanificación del desarrollo sostenible del municipio. A travésde los Observatorios se orienta y facilita la ejecución deprogramas y proyectos económicos, sociales y ambientalesincluidos en el Plan de Desarrollo y se canaliza la participaciónciudadana en la planificación. En este sentido, su carácterdebe ser participativo y permanente.

¿Quiénes los lideran y quien administrará losObservatorios?El gobierno municipal es el líder natural del proyecto. Sinembargo, en el caso de Manizales los antecedentes de unliderazgo compartido entre el municipio y la universidad hanposibilitado la administración conjunta. Igualmente, se hanvinculado instancias gubernamentales con aportares enrecursos técnicos, humanos y financieros para la adminis-tración y funcionamiento.

¿Quién diseñó el sistema de Observatorios?El sistema lo diseñó un grupo técnico integrado porfuncionarios municipales e investigadores del Instituto deEstudios Ambientales de la Universidad Nacional de Colom-bia y de la Universidad Autónoma de Manizales, ambasuniversidades con reconocida trayectoria en la gestión deldesarrollo sostenible del municipio. Para ello se contó con laasistencia técnica de la Comisión Económica para AméricaLatina (CEPAL). Como prueba, el grupo técnico realizó unprimer prototipo que puso en funcionamiento en la fase desocialización comunitaria del proyecto.

¿Porqué es importante la concertación interinstitucionalpara el funcionamiento de los Observatorios?La concertación interinstitucional es necesaria para la imple-mentación de los Observatorios porque el funcionamientode los Observatorios depende de la información que sesuministra en instituciones de orden nacional, regional y local.Estos ‘socios’ adquieren el compromiso con el municipio encuanto aportan recursos económicos, técnicos y logísticos.Sin embargo, es fundamental el liderazgo del gobierno localen las convocatorias para la firma de los Convenios de Coop-eración, según las particularidades de la gestión interinstitu-cional.

¿Que se entiende en los Observatorios por educaciónciudadana participativa?Se pretende ampliar el conocimiento sobre la realidad parapromover el compromiso de la ciudadanía con los proyectosy los programas que el Plan de Desarrollo Municipal tieneprevistos para mejorar las condiciones económicas, sociales y

GEN

ERAL SECTIO

N


Los Observatorios para el Desarrollo Sostenibles en Manizales, Colombia 14

ambientales del municipio. La promoción de grupos de estu-dios del desarrollo sostenible en cada comuna, la partici-pación de los comités de apoyo, juntas de acción comunal,juntas administradoras locales (JAL) y de los distintos sectoreseconómicos, gremios, instituciones y organizaciones nogubernamentales en los proyectos de educación ciudadanaintensificará la participación ciudadana consiente. Los Obser-vatorios deberán constituirse en espacios de participaciónciudadana a partir del momento en que se conozcan losresultados de indicadores de calidad de vida del municipio,de su comuna y de su barrio en particular.

¿Quiénes lideran el proceso de educación comunitaria parael funcionamiento de los observatorios?La Secretaría de Desarrollo Comunitario y el Instituto deCapacitación Municipal de desempeñarán esta función, conel apoyo de las universidades inscritas en el Convenio deCooperación del Biomanizales. También se integraronalgunas de las ONG’s que estén trabajando en los diversosprogramas de capacitación ciudadana de las comunas.

¿Cómo se conocerán los indicadores?Durante el proceso de elaboración, actualización y selecciónde los indicadores que harán parte del sistema de Observa-torios de desarrollo sostenible del municipio de Manizales, setuvieron en cuenta tanto indicadores de aplicación genérica,que permitirán comparar el estado de desarrollo sostenibledel municipio con el de otros municipios de Colombia o deAmérica Latina, como aquellos que permitirán conocer alnivel local el estado de desarrollo sostenible de las distintascomunas que integran la ciudad. A través monitoreo perma-nente de los indicadores y su expresión de calidad en lossemáforos electrónicos localizados en los observatorios, losciudadanos podrán detectar oportunamente los cambioscualitativos que se produzcan en su comuna. El sistema secompone de factores, variables, indicadores que serán proce-sados a través de un programa de computador, especial-mente diseñado para el proyecto y que tiene como objetivoser accesible tanto a los expertos o especialistas, como a laciudadanía en general. Igualmente, el diseño incluye unconjunto de herramientas técnicas que permitirán agilizar elproceso de ajuste de los indicadores y su evaluación periódicay realizar un control y seguimiento oportuno sobre las vari-ables más críticas.

¿Cómo se expresa la calidad del desarrollo sostenible delmunicipio? Se utilizara el Semáforo de Calidad de Vida sistema que desar-rollo el Idea de la Universidad Nacional en Manizales y que ha

sido utilizado por en el municipio para hacer la evaluaciónpermanente de aspectos ambientales y sociales. Estametodología ha sido utilizada en muchas otras ciudades del paíspor la sencillez de su expresión metodológica, su evolución yaplicación en el caso del municipio de Manizales ha permitidollegar a establecer indicadores articulados a un sistema de eval-uación y seguimiento a través de los Observatorios.

¿Quiénes participan en el funcionamiento de losObservatorios?La participación del gobierno municipal es indispensable, poresta razón se integró a las propuestas del Plan de Desarrollocomo instrumento de gestión. Es necesario que la Oficina dePlaneación del Municipio y Corpocaldas, las instituciones deapoyo, los gremios y la comunidad organizada se comprometansegún sus intereses y posibilidades. Por esto, es definitivo quedurante el proceso se constituyan los grupos que apoyarán elliderazgo del gobierno local en la evaluación objetiva de losprogramas y los proyectos y en el suministro oportuno de lainformación para el procesamiento de los indicadores.

¿Quiénes aportarán los recursos para el funcionamiento delos Observatorios?Los recursos provienen en primera instancia del presupuestomunicipal, pero para los proyectos y programas específicoses necesario concertar el apoyo de otros recursos locales,regionales y nacionales, y concretar el apoyo técnico inter-nacional. Igualmente, es necesario cuantificar el potencialtécnico y de recursos humanos que existe en el municipiocomo recursos de contrapartida en el suministro de infor-mación. Hasta el momento se han comprometido la Univer-sidad Nacional, la Universidad Autónoma, el Ministerio deMedio Ambiente y la CEPAL.

¿Que se entiende en los Observatorios por cultura políticade la participación ciudadana?Es importante reconocer que la acción política de lospobladores urbanos debe recuperar su protagonismo eimportancia local. Igualmente, hay que trabajar integral-mente para que los Planes de Desarrollo Municipal se convier-

“Los Observatorios para el DesarrolloSostenible del municipio de Manizalesen Colombia, hacen parte del sistema demonitoreo propuesto como apoyo a lagestión urbana local”

GEN

ERA

L SE

CTIO

N


Luz Estela Velásquez14

tan en instrumentos de consolidación de una cultura políticaarticulada a la participación ciudadana. En los Observatoriosdeberán integrarse programas y proyectos que sean defactible realización y que generen procesos políticos de partic-ipación y pertenencia ciudadana.

¿Que papel cumple el Consejo Territorial de PlaneaciónMunicipal?El Consejo Territorial de Planeación Municipal es la máximarepresentación compartida de la sociedad civil en los proce-sos de planificación participativa, por ello su liderazgo esfundamental para el proyecto. Se sugiere que se vincule a laConvocatoria y participe activamente en el proceso de ambi-entalización del proyecto.

¿Que papel juega los líderes comunitarios?La posibilidad real de permanencia de los Observatoriosdepende de en gran medida de la posibilidad que se le dé ala comunidad en su funcionamiento. Es importante resaltarque por el carácter participativo de los Observatorios, seinvolucren desde la fase de ambientalización del proyecto,líderes ciudadanos que han respaldado anteriormente lasocialización en las comunas. Igualmente, se requiere que enesta fase se definan los mecanismos de participación adecua-dos para los distintos actores: gobierno, instituciones yciudadano.

¿Se realizará la evaluación y seguimiento de losObservatorios?El funcionamiento de los Observatorios tiene que evaluarse,para ello se requiere de realizar el seguimiento con indi-cadores de gestión. Esta es una fase definitiva para lospropósitos de los Observatorios. En este sentido, es necesariomantener actualizada la información sobre el municipio yrealizar el monitoreo permanente sobre su situación, al igualque registrar los cambios ocurridos con la ejecución del Plande Desarrollo Municipal y establecer indicadores que permi-tan un mejor control de los procesos de gestión que sepromueven y desarrollan con cooperación técnica institu-ciones del orden local, nacional o internacional.

El Reto: el funcionamiento permanente losObservatoriosEl funcionamiento de los Observatorios para el DesarrolloSostenible del municipio de Manizales, depende en granmedida de la forma como se dinamice hoy la participaciónciudadana y se capacite a la comunidad para la planificacióny el liderazgo en los programas y proyectos del Plan de Desar-rollo Municipal. En este sentido, es claro que en Manizales serequiere ampliar la capacidad del gobierno local y las institu-ciones para desarrollar los Observatorios como parte integralde una metodología que conduzca a involucrar a la totalidadde las instituciones del gobierno con la ciudadanía.

Se requiere de la permanencia y cambios cualitativos enel largo plazo, los indicadores de sostenibilidad deberánrevelar o señalar si la calidad de vida en el municipio estamejorando o empeorando y si el gobierno municipal a travésde la implementación de programas y proyectos, se encuen-tra en el camino sostenible en cuanto el uso de los recursospara satisfacer equitativamente las demandas y deseos de lapoblación de hoy y del futuro. Por ello el Plan de Desarrollotiene la tarea de integrar programas y proyectos que benefi-cien los aspectos económico, social y ambiental de maneramas equilibrada, para mejorar integralmente la calidad devida de la población.

Es importante que se desarrollen paralelamente y deforma complementaria los procesos de capacitación comu-nitaria propuestos para el óptimo funcionamiento de losobservatorios e incluir el conjunto de herramientas técnicasque permitan agilizar el proceso de ajuste de indicadores parauna evaluación periódica eficaz y oportuna.

Igualmente, la capacidad real del numero de Observatoriosque puede sostener el sistema, no solo desde el punto de vistatécnico, sino desde la capacidad de promover la participaciónciudadana. La importancia radicará en que sea accesible,entendible y posibilite la participación ciudadana en los obje-tivos del corto y mediano plazo del Plan de Desarrollo. En unproceso de planificación permanente y más participativa sedebe realizar un control y seguimiento periódico sobre lasáreas críticas para definir con la participación de la comunidad,acciones integrales y concretas de actuación y planificación.

ABOUT THE AUTHORLuz Estela Velásquez, IDEA: UniversidadNacional Manizales, Facultad de Arquitectura,‘El Cable’, Manizales, COLOMBIA.Email: [email protected]ásquez, L.S. (1998) ‘Agenda 21: a form ofjoint environmental management in Manizales,Colombia’. In D. Satterthwaite and J. Bicknell(Eds.), Environment and Urbanization: Sustain-able cities revisited, Vol. 10, No. 2, London: IIED.

Plan Sectorial Ambiental del Biomanizales:Bioplan 1997-2000. IDEA Universidad Nacionalde Colombia Sede Manizales – Municipio deManizales. Velásquez, L.S. (1997) ‘Sistema de Monitoreo,Seguimiento y Control de la actuación del Plande Desarrollo Manizales Calidad Siglo XXIAlcaldú de Manizales, Colombia’. DiscussionPaper. Proyecto gestión urbana en ciudadesintermedias seleccionadas de América Latina yel Caribe. Santiago de Chile: Comisión

Económica para América Latina y el Caribe(CEPAL).Velásquez, L.S (2000) Estrategias e Instrumentosde Gestión Urbana para elDesarrollo Sostenible en América Latina y elCaribe. Observatorios para elDesarrollo Sostenible del Municipio deManizales – Colombia. Manizales: IDEA, CEPAL,United Nations, Municipio de Manizales.

GEN

ERAL SECTIO

N


presenting it in an accessible and understandable way. It isnot meant to be exhaustive or comprehensive, but onlysuperficial and indicative. Market scoping focuses on identi-fying sources of information, key players in the market, andthe main marketing issues that need to be addressed.Twobasic principles apply to market scoping:• information should be collected in a participatory way to

encourage ownership of the results;• where possible, the information should be displayed graph-

ically (i.e. maps and pictures) that can be updated from timeto time and which are accessible (i.e. can be pinned to thewall of the extension office).

Marketing systems for individual commodities are consid-ered holistically. Thus, all the activities leading up to the saleand final consumption of a product are incorporated. Forexample, this can include preparation, transportation, trans-formation, storage, processing, packaging, storage, selling,and so on.

The purposes of conducting a market scoping exercise are:• to draw together existing information on production, market-

ing, and consumption patterns in the area under study;• to determine the market information needs of the key

client groups;• to prioritise interventions according to more market related

criteria; and,

Introduction It is often difficult for rural people, and those who are tryingto assist them, to gain an overview of how the markets fortheir main products function. Markets are not transparent;participants in the marketing process are often reluctant toshare their knowledge for fear of being bypassed, andmarketing costs and losses are subsumed into the final price,in a way that prevents sound decision-making by producers.

Efforts to improve the quality of agricultural extensionadvice at the level of individual farmers, farmer groups, andcooperatives in the Philippines and Namibia during the pastsix years have led to the development of a series of simpletools which allow the building of a local marketing picture.

This picture then forms the basic tool for interactionbetween service providers (in our case, area team membersin the Philippines and agricultural extension officers inNamibia) and clients (rural households). This picture is thestarting point for a more in-depth consideration of market-ing and business plans and strategies using participatorytools, which focus on individual households (see for exampleRoos and Mohatle, 1998).

Defining the marketing environmentMarket scoping is a broad method of quickly and simplygathering information about a marketing system and

by BEN BENNETT

Market scoping: methods tohelp people understand theirmarketing environment

15

GEN

ERA

L SE

CTIO

N


Ben Bennett15

• to identify and classify marketing infrastructure and insti-tutions.

It was found in both the Philippines and Namibia thattraditional participatory rural appraisal (PRA) methods(ranking, seasonal calendars, mapping, transects, Venndiagrams, etc.) revealed a great deal of information aboutthe assets available to a given community and their relation-ship to those assets. However, these methods reveal littleabout the potential for broadening and deepening livelihoodpossibilities through improved marketing. Discussions withextensionists revealed that, whilst often much was knownabout the production system of a particular crop, almostnothing was known about the dynamics of demand for thatproduct and its potential alternatives. Furthermore, it wasoften the case that considerable effort had been expended toenhance yields, through improved seeds, better tillagemethods, improved weed control etc. but that in some casesthe benefits accruing from such improvements were beinglost because of post-harvest losses. The most poorly under-stood of these losses was where the product had notachieved the hoped for market price. Usually this phenomenais ascribed to unfair practices by middlemen, a view univer-sally held by those unaware of the way the market operates.In discussions of the problems constraining development, oneof the most common highly ranked issues is that of inade-quate prices. Broadly speaking, it was to allow this issue to beunderstood in a participatory way, that some of the methodsdescribed in this article were developed.

What is needed to understand the immediatemarketing environment?To describe the marketing microenvironment for a given area,a two-stage approach was adopted. The first, a process ofmarket mapping, involved preparing a resource map for thetarget area, which specifically focused on marketing,

markets, and marketing resources. Secondly, the team useda number of methods, to narrow down the focus of inquiryonto a limited number of key marketable products, and tothen understand those commodities in depth.

Market mapping Invitees to the market scoping workshop were requested tobring with them any maps of their immediate areas. In bothNamibia and the Philippines, even the most isolated areasmanaged to find maps from their local government depart-ment of works. These maps were stuck to tables withmasking tape and a layer of tracing paper fixed firmly overthe top. Participants then traced the basic elements of themap onto the tracing paper and this formed the master mapfor each area under consideration.

Having created a master map, groups of participants (allextensionists in Namibia, but including key informants suchas heads of cooperatives and non-governmental organisa-tions (NGOs), local government workers, and marketmanagers in the Philippines) then added to this map as muchmarket related information as possible. This could include:roads and their seasonality of use (access to markets is oftenconstrained by impassable roads); formal and informalmarkets (and which days they occurred on); formal and infor-mal abattoirs; grain processing locations; sites of conglom-erations of middlemen, such as ports, key bridges, andprocessing plants; and so on. The volume of informationincluded on such a map is only constrained by the knowl-edge of the participants.

It was found in the Philippines that the volume of infor-mation was too much for a single sheet, so a series of plasticoverlays were created illustrating different types of marketinfrastructure such as cattle, coconuts, maize, fish, etc. TheFilipino map also included areas of production, which allowedsimple analysis of the relationship between production andmarketing/processing to take place, often revealing keybottlenecks to market development.

In many cases, it was found that the process of creatingthe market map led to a new understanding of the overallmarket dynamics in a given area, and particularly the rela-tionship between market access constraints and price. In thePhilippines, this information was used to target communitymarket information delivery, so that prices for the sameproduct in two markets (which were easy to get to from thetarget area) could be given to allow producers to deliver tothe market with the highest price.

As a follow-up activity to the creation of a market map,a series of market watches were then conducted. Theseconsisted of a small team visiting a market in their area from

“Market scoping is a broad method ofquickly and simply gatheringinformation about a marketing systemand presenting it in an accessible andunderstandable way. Market scopingfocuses on identifying sources ofinformation, key players in the market,and the main marketing issues thatneed to be addressed”

GEN

ERAL SECTIO

N


Market scoping: methods to help people understand their marketing environment 15

very early in the day and then following the progress of prod-ucts arriving and then being sold. This revealed to participantsthe prices of products arriving and leaving the market, themarketing costs involved, and importantly, the type ofconsumer involved and some of the consumer’s needs.

Marketing systems analysisA marketing system is the sum of all activities leading to thesale and final consumption of a product, and may includeactivities such as preparation, transport, processing, packag-ing, storage, and selling. All these factors are influenced notonly by the nature of the product, but also by social andcultural factors which can fall outside the influence of theproduct or the market. For example, in Namibia the sale ofcattle is largely unrelated to market price, but rather relatedto social or physical need. Thus, to understand how market-ing systems operate in such areas, broader concepts thansimple marketing economics need to be applied.

Prioritising key commodities – commodity rankingExperience in both the Philippines and Namibia showed thatrural households see value in an enormous number of natu-rally available products. This breadth of items often came as a

surprise to the extension workers involved, who are trained toconcentrate on commodities of strategic importance (usuallythe key food grain plus livestock). If non-agricultural goods areincluded (i.e. non-timber forestry products such as baskets andfirewood), the list of commodities can become extremely long.One group in Namibia, a country ostensibly without great agri-cultural or livelihood diversity, identified 60 marketedcommodities in their area, far more than they expected. In thePhilippines, this could run to well over 100 items.

The commodity ranking exercise consists of three stages.First, participants list all the commodities they can think ofthat might be marketed or which have value. The group thenbrainstorm a set of criteria by which to rank the commodities.Examples of these criteria include: important for food secu-rity, profitability, drought tolerance, seasonal advantages,beneficial to women, requiring little labour, traditionallyimportant, etc. Participants then score the commodities on ascale of one to three (three being the most important) andthe scores are totalled1 (see Box 1).

1 The author recognises the potential statistical pitfalls of ranking provided bysuch a method (see Fielding et al, 1998), however the purpose is only to limit thescope of further research to a manageable level. Commodities not selected forfurther research in the first round will be considered later.

CommodityCriteria

Total Rank1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Melon seeds ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ 23 4th

Jackal berries ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓ 17 8th

Chillies ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ 26 1st

Local spinach ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ 23 4th

Pear millet ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓ 24 3rd

Baskets ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ 17 8th

Thatching grass ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ 18 7th

Grain storage basket ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ 17 8th

Milk ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓ 18 7th

Cattle ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓ 21 5th

Goats ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓ 24 3rd

Braai meat ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓ 18 7th

Chicken ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓ 18 7th

Sorghum beverage ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓ 18 7th

Marula juice ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ 17 8th

Marula kernel ✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ 19 6th

Spinach cake ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓ ✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ 17 8th

Flour (millet, sorghum) ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓✓ 25 2nd

Millet-based soft drink ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓ 19 6th

Processed palm fronds ✓✓ ✓ ✓✓✓ ✓ ✓ ✓✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ ✓✓ 17 8th

Box 1: Commodity ranking

GEN

ERA

L SE

CTIO

N


Ben Bennett15

During evaluation of this method with participants it wasagreed that, in order to make the process not too demand-ing, the number of criteria should not be more than ten, andif possible, no more than 50 commodity items should beincluded. Experience also suggests that time spent properlydefining the criteria and the meaning of the scores attachedto each criterion will be repaid later as this will mean fewerarguments over the group ranking decision.

The purpose of commodity ranking is two fold. Firstly, itreveals the large number of economically and socially impor-tant commodities in a given area. Secondly, the processallows a large group to agree on the commodities that willget greater attention in the market scoping process.

Commodity system and chain analysisHaving narrowed the focus of commodities to be investi-gated, the teams then applied two further methods to build-ing a more in-depth picture of marketing problems andpotential for each commodity. First, the group conducted acommodity chain analysis using a simple table (see Box 2).This takes a single commodity and breaks down all theactions from production to marketing. In Namibia, wherethere are relatively simple marketing systems, few middle-men and little processing, these chains were short. In thePhilippines, the opposite was often the case.

Having listed all the stages of marketing and processing,more information can be added, such as the gender differ-entiation of the activity (is the activity done by men, women,or children?). This part of the exercise is particularly useful asit allows the correct targeting of interventions. If, for example,it is found that women take the product to market, trainingin marketing for men is pointless. For each stage, the groupthen discussed losses and problems. These problems thenwent on to become the focus of future interventions.

Groups agreed that the commodity chain analysis wasvery useful in revealing problems that were hitherto hiddento them. However, they all preferred to conduct the exercisein larger, rather than small groups (i.e. they did not want tobe split up into groups considering individual commodities).

Using commodity chain analysis to develop seasonalcalendarsFor each commodity, the group prepared a seasonal calendarshowing when in the season the activities identified occurred(see Box 3). They were also asked to indicate when during theseason the best prices would be achieved for each commod-ity. This information can then be used to discuss with farmersproduction strategies that maximise seasonal price advantage.

In Namibia, we discovered a problem with this approachin that the timing of marketing varies according to the onsetof the rains. Therefore a system was needed to understandthe relationship between the time of planting and the otheractivities involved in producing and marketing. The result wasthe development of the ‘Bennett’s Wheel’ concept (see Box4). This consists of two wheels, divided into 12 equal parts torepresent months. On the larger wheel the months aremarked, and on the smaller wheel the critical activities. Thetwo wheels are then joined at the centre point so that thesmaller wheel can rotate. The extensionists/farmer can thenset a sowing time for the month of rain arrival and predictthe time when the product will be marketed.

The group decided on an additional sophistication to thewheel, which involved putting an indicator of the price possi-bility on the larger wheel and then reading this off througha hole cut next to the ‘selling’ segment of the smaller wheel.This allowed the user to consider adjusting planting time onthe basis of potential market price.

ConclusionIn areas where the focus of attention has been production andproductivity of rural activities, market scoping can be veryuseful for broadening the horizons of rural service providers. Itis clearly important for extensionists to understand the imme-diate marketing environment for those commodities that theyare recommending to farmers, and upon which they are askedto indicate research and investment priorities. Market scopingis a starting point for a much more market-oriented approachto farming and livelihoods systems analysis.

Commodity Chillies M/F/Ch Losses Problems

Activities toproduce andmarket thecommodity

Sowing (seed pot) F/Ch X

Transplant F/Ch X

Watering Ch 0

Harvesting F/Ch XXX Breaking of chillies

Drying F/Ch XXX Insects; moisture

Packaging F/Ch X

Transporting M/F/Ch 0

Selling F XX Stealing at theselling points

Box 2: Commodity chain analysis

M: male F: female Ch: children 0: no losses X: small losses XX: average losses XXX: high losses

GEN

ERAL SECTIO

N


Market scoping: methods to help people understand their marketing environment 15

ABOUT THE AUTHORBen Bennett, P.O. Box 40624, Ausspannplatz,Windhoek, Namibia.Email: [email protected] Ben is a Principle Scientist with the NaturalResources Institute,University of Greenwich, UK, currently onsecondment as team leader of theEU funded Namibian Agricultural SupportServices Project (NASSP).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe author is indebted to the staff and benefi-ciaries of the EU Small Island Support ServicesProgramme (SMISLE) in the Philippines and theMinistry of Agriculture, Water and Rural Devel-opment, Namibia. Pepa Dumon, MiguelLoureiro, and Marion Palmer made significantcontributions to the evolution of thisapproach.

REFERENCESRoos, M. & Mohatle, M. (1998) ‘Investigatinglocal markets using PRA’. In A. Jeans (Ed) PLANotes 33, pp.45–53. London: IIED.Fielding, J., Riley, J. & Ayejola, B. (1998) ‘Ranksare statistics: some advice for their interpreta-tion’. In A. Jeans (Ed) PLA Notes 33, pp.35–39.London: IIED.

CHILLIES Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month

Sowing (seed pot)

Transplant

Watering

Harvesting

Drying

Packaging

Transporting

Selling

Box 3: Commodity chain analysis

Box 4: ‘Bennett’s Wheel’ – flexible seasonal calendars.

Large wheel

Small wheel

SowingTransplantWatering

Watering

WateringHarvestingDrying

PackagingTransporting

Selling

$$$

$

$

$

$

$$

$

$

$

$

$$

January

February

March

April

MayJune

July

August

September

October

November December

TIPS

FO

R TR

AIN

ERS


Tips for trainersby JOHN NEWSTROM and EDWARD SCANNELL

• ‘What kind of questions should Iask?’

• ‘What will the room/programme/trainers, etc. be like?’

• ‘Will we receive the promised perdiem?’

2. ‘What can I/we the trainer(s)do to reduce your concerns?’Possibilities include explaining thedress ‘code’, defining all acronymsused, having copies of anyoverheads to be used, speakingslowly, and so on. ● Source: John Newstrom and EdwardScannell (1980)● Taken from: Pretty J.N., Guijt I.,Thompson J. and Scoones I. (1995)Participatory Learning and Action, aTrainer’s Guide. London: IIED SustainableAgriculture and Rural LivelihoodsProgramme, IIED.

needs, as well as provide reassuranceby using the items to indicate howthe seminar does/does not relate tothose concerns.

CommentsUse the following questions to helpin the debriefing.

1. ‘What were some of the fears,concerns, or preconceived notionsexpressed in each group?’ Pastexamples include the following:• ‘Will I be the oldest (youngest)

person?’• ‘Will I be the only man (woman)?’• ‘Will I act appropriately at my first

professional seminar?’• ‘I am sure everyone will be more

experienced than I am.’• ‘What will I get out of the

programme?’

Hopes and fears – introductionand icebreaking

ObjectiveTo allow participants to express,share, and reduce the misconceptionsthey may have brought with them toa training programme.

MaterialFlipcharts or notepaper

Time 25 minutes

ProcedureIn some workshops, participants maycome from a large geographical area,may know very little about theproposed programme, may not knoweach other, or may not know what isexpected of them. In these cases, itmay be appropriate to create a forumfor exchanging and discussing somepreconceptions.

1. Divide the participants intosmall groups of 4–6 people. Give aflipchart or notepaper to each group.

2. Have each group selectsomeone to record the information.Ask them to respond quickly to thequestion. ‘What fears, concerns, orpreconceived notions did you havebefore coming here today?’

3. After gathering responsesquickly, ask the reporters to presenttheir lists to the entire group. This willpresent excellent opportunities forthe trainer to empathise with trainee


IN TO

UCH

in touch

Book reviewsPlanning forCountry: Cross-culturalapproaches todecision-makingon Aboriginallands.● Edited by Fiona

Walsh and Paul Mitchell, 2002Reviewed by Irene GuijtPictures and stories speak a thousandwords – this message emergesstrongly from this beautiful andrespectful volume of experiences fromcentral Australia. The editors, FionaWalsh and Paul Mitchell, have createda wonderful reading journey withdozens of evocative pictures, strikingphotos, and stories about well-triedmethods. It is clear from their carefulselection of experiences and focusedediting that reveals both excitementand reservations that both are,themselves, skilled in participatoryplanning. Throughout the book,much thought is given to the non-Australian reader or thoseinexperienced with Aboriginal waysand words.

The book opens with a context-setting description of Aboriginalpeople in central Australia. This helpsthe reader understand some of thespecific issues about the Aboriginalcontext and implications for planning.A section on participatory planninghighlights key ethical questions, suchas the misappropriation of Aboriginalinformation and Aboriginal languageand ‘high English’. This is followed bya series of frequently asked questionsthat are both thought provoking andpractical. Questions include, forexample, ‘Are democracy and genderequity compatible with Aboriginaldecision-making?’, ‘How muchshould planning cost?’, and ‘Can

Welcome to the In Touch section ofPLA Notes. Through these pages wehope to create a more participatoryresource for the PLA Notes audience,to put you, as a reader, in touch withother readers. We want this section tobe a key source of up-to-dateinformation on training, publications,and networks. Your help is vital inkeeping us all in touch about:• Networks. Do you have links with

recognised local, national orinternational networks forpractitioners of participatorylearning? If so, what does thisnetwork provide – training?newsletters? resourcematerial/library? a forum for sharingexperiences? Please tell us about thenetwork and provide contact detailsfor other readers.

• Training. Do you know of anyforthcoming training events orcourses in participatorymethodologies? Are you a traineryourself? Are you aware of any keytraining materials that you would

like to share with other trainers?• Publications. Do you know of any

key publications on participatorymethodologies and their use? Haveyou (or has your organisation)produced any books, reports, orvideos that you would like otherreaders to know about?

• Electronic information. Do you knowof any electronic conferences orpages on the Internet whichexchange or provide information onparticipatory methodologies?

• Other information. Perhaps you haveideas about other types ofinformation that would be useful forthis section. If so, please let us know.

Please send your responses to: PLA Notes, Sustainable Agriculture andRural Livelihoods Programme, IIED, 3 Endsleigh Street, London WC1HODD, UK. Fax: + 44 (0)20 7388 2826; Email: [email protected] Notes is published in February,June, and October. Please submitmaterial two months before thepublication date.

IN T

OU

CH


Book reviews

Aboriginal people be facilitators intheir own country?‘. This elaborateintroduction makes a refreshingchange from other books onparticipatory planning thatoveremphasise the role of methodsand overlook the ethical and culturaldimensions of planning.

Methods are, of course, discussedas well in the book. The methods area delight to read, written as they arefollowing considerable adaptation toAboriginal issues and communicationnorms. This would wake the mostexperienced of facilitators out of theirmethods-sleep by showing howclarity of purpose and creativity cangive rise to effective planningmethods. The editors include forexample, ‘look around country, stopand learn – cross-country transects’and ‘everyone hear the same story –talk as one mob’. Each illustratedmethod is clear on purpose, when touse, how to go about it, andstrengths and limitations.

What I found most striking,though, about this volume were the22 Stories about Planning. Spokenfrom the heart, often short andfocused, the stories are a mix ofpersonal views and shared processes.They range from the very practical –‘Warlmanpa people make a groundmap’ – to the philosophical – ‘I didn’tsay that. I’m the interpreter’. Togetherthey clearly show the critical reflectionand human respect on which theseexperiences were based. The authorsdiscuss conflicts, problems, theconsiderable time, and negotiationsthat are present in all multi-stakeholder participatory planningprocesses. The stories offer innovativesolutions to problems that manyothers will recognise from theirpractice.

The combination of practical andethical, visual and descriptive, generic

and applied stories makes this book ajoy to read and a sure source ofinspiration for all facilitators ofparticipatory processes. ■ Available from: Jukurrpa Books, animprint of IAD Press, PO Box 2531 AliceSprings, Northern Territory 0871, Australia.Tel: (+61) 618 8951 1334; Fax: (+61) 6188952 2527; Email: [email protected] ISBN:1864650370

EthnoveterinaryMedicine: anannotatedbibliography ofcommunity animalhealthcare● M. Martin, E. Mathiasand C.M. McCorkle,

ITDG Publishing, 2001For millennia, people have usedhome-grown veterinary skills andtechniques to keep their animalshealthy. But only during the lastdecade have people’s local knowledgeand skills received much attention,under the rubric of ‘ethnoveterinarymedicine’. This rich bibliographycontains annotations of 1,240publications that deal withsociocultural, politico-economic,environmental, and biomedicalaspects of community animalhealthcare. Entries span 118 countriesof Europe, Africa, the Americas, Asia,and the Pacific. Examples of ordinarypeople’s diverse knowledge, skills,beliefs, and practices are recorded forsome 200 health problems of 25livestock species. Reference is madeto hundreds of plant species orgenera, to inorganic items orcompounds, and innumerablefoodstuffs and household itemsemployed as materia medica intreatments that run the gamut ofmedicinal, surgical,physical/mechanical, andsupernatural.

■ Available from: ITDG Publishing, 103–105Southampton Row, London WC1B 4HL, UK.Tel: +44 (0)20 7436 9761; Fax: +44 (0)207436 2013; Website:www.itdgpublishing.org.uk

Lessons from theField: evaluatingan integratedreproductivehealth program:India case study● C. McKaig, WorldNeighbors, 2002

This report details the methods andfindings of an evaluation ofintegrated reproductive healthprogrammes in two villages in India,with comparisons to a third villagethat had no reproductive healthprogramming. The evaluationcombines participatory and moretraditional quantitative methods, andwas carried out by World NeighborsIndia in partnership with the BayaluSeeme Rural Development Society, alocal organisation that works withmarginalised groups in two sub-districts in the southern Indian stateof Karnataka. Originally, theprogramme had been oriented to dryland sustainable agriculture; thereproductive health component wassubsequently developed based onprevious World Neighbors’experiences in Nepal. The findingsshown in this report suggest that theintegrated approach is effective inachieving high rates of reproductivehealth knowledge and positivepractices, improvements in women’sstatus, and significant benefits fromparticipating in savings and creditgroups.■ Available from: World Neighbors,International Headquarters, 4127 NW 122ndStreet, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73120,USA. Tel: +1 (405) 752 9700; Fax: +1(405)752 9393; Email: [email protected]

Book reviews/Workshops and events


IN TO

UCH

Sharing Our NaturalResources: thecommunities of Al Ain,Sudan, and Al AinNatural ForestManagement Project● Video, SOS SahelInternational (UK)

Although this video does not addressany specific participatorymethodology, it shows a successfulexample of participatory forestmanagement. It is the story of aproject in North Kordofan, Sudan,which promoted community-basednatural resource management from1989 to 2001. The story is told bylocal people, all depending on theirnatural resources in different ways:men and women who live in villagesand pastoralist camps in the area,traditional community leaders, andproject staff. The video aims to informforesters and development workers

from governmental and non-governmental organisations, as wellas local people who are involved incommunity-based natural resourcemanagement in the Sahel andelsewhere. The video, 30 minuteslong, is available in Arabic withEnglish subtitles.■ Available from: SOS Sahel International(UK), 1 Tolpuddle Street, London N1 0XT,UK. Tel: +44 (0)20 7837 9129; Email:[email protected]; or SOS SahelInternational (UK), PO Box 1387, Khartoum,Sudan. Tel: +249 11 777 027; Email:[email protected]

Community-basedanimal healthcare:A practical guideto improvingprimary veterinaryservices● Andy Catley,Stephen Blakeway and

Tim Leyland, ITDG Publishing, London, 2002.Community-based approaches toimproving animal health have beenevolving for many years but fewpublications are available to guideanimal health professionals wishing toestablish basic veterinary services inrural areas. This book is a 'how to doit' guide covering all aspects ofcommunity-based animal healthwork. It is designed for use at fieldlevel, though it is equally relevant topolicy makers and veterinary traininginstitutes for its clear presentation ofboth the key theories behindcommunity-based services and the'nuts and bolts' and participatorymethods needed to make themfunction. ■ Available from: ITDG Publishing, 103-105Southampton Row, London WC1B 4HL, UKTel: +44 (0)20 7436 9761; Fax: +4 (0)207436 2013; Email: [email protected]: 1 85339485 8

Workshops andEventsParticipatory Monitoring andEvaluation (PM&E) 10th – 28th March 2003 Cavite, PhilippinesNow in its 6th year, the PM&E courseis designed for development projectexecutives, research study leaders, andextension officers who are managingand/or implementing community-based development activities. Itexamines PM&E at the community,programme, and organisational levels.Selected cases are presented anddiscussed. PM&E concepts, theories,methods, tools, and techniques thathave been tested and used in the fieldare shared. Please note that anoptional M&E preparatory session willbe held on 6th – 8th March 2003.

NGO Leadership, Development, andSocial Change 20th January – 7th February 2003Cavite, PhilippinesThis course is designed to increaseNGO leaders and managers’ ability todescribe and critique NGO socialchange strategies; review conceptsand theories of leadership; allowthem to reflect on their ownleadership style and behaviour; and,identify characteristics of effectiveleaders and apply them to existingNGO leaders. The highlight of thecourse is the simultaneous applicationof individual and team learning withlearners from other GlobalPartnership sites in Bangladesh, Peru,and the USA.● For further information about these twocourses, please contact: Education andTraining Programme, International Instituteof Rural Reconstruction, Y.C. James Yen

Center, Silang 4118, Cavite, Philippines.Telefax: +(63-46) 4142423; Tel: +(63-46)4142417; Fax: +(63-46) 4142420; Email:Education&[email protected]; Website:www.iirr.org/html/International.htm

Facilitation for Gender Equality23rd February – 8th March 2003 (inPortuguese)Egmond aan Zee, The NetherlandsThis course is designed as anelaboration and deepening of theformer Training of Trainers (TOT) andis meant for gender trainers,educators, gender focal points with atraining assignment, and activists. Thecourse enables them to support aprocess of gender-awareorganisational change as a facilitatorand to design and implement gendertraining courses at programme andorganisational level.● For further information, please contact:

Workshops and eventsIN

TO

UCH


Gender and Development Training Centre,Wilhelminastraat 18, 2011 VM Haarlem, TheNetherlands. Tel: +31 23 5342149; Fax: +3123 5513260; Email: [email protected];Website: www.gender-training.nl

The Forum Theatre Week17th – 21st March 2003Cardboard Citizens, London, UKThrough the week participants willinvestigate the theory and practice ofForum Theatre, an interactivetheatrical form originally devised byAugusto Boal for use in Latin Americaas a tool for social change. A numberof simple games and exercises aroundtrust, confidence, and groupintegration will be introduced andexplained, to equip participants tolead workshop sessions with theirown groups. Participants look at theprocess of finding ‘hot’ topics for anygiven group, how to devise a ForumTheatre piece, and how to conduct apublic Forum session. No experienceis necessary.

The Rainbow of Desires Week24th – 28th March 2003Cardboard Citizens, London, UKThrough the week, Augusto Boal willintroduce the work he has subtitled‘theatre and therapy’, by means ofanectode, games, and exercises. Asthe group develops the trust andconfidence to share stories, the workwill progress from simple image workto increasingly complex means ofuncovering and confronting ‘the copsin the head’. Each day will include atleast one of the major techniquescontained in his book, The Rainbowof Desires. In the mornings membersof the group will have the opportunityto experiment with leading exercisesthemselves.

● For further information on both coursesplease contact: Cardboard Citizens, 26Hanbury Street, London E1 6QR, UK. Tel:+44 (0)20 7247 7747; Fax: +44 (0)20 76500002; Email: [email protected];Website: www.cardboardcitizens.org.uk

Participatory Appraisal20th – 24th January and 28th April –2nd May 2003Northumbria University, Newcastleupon Tyne, UKThis interactive course uses PAtechniques and includes ‘real world’fieldwork placements, based onongoing projects, which allowparticipants to try out the techniquesand gain experience and confidencein applying them on the streets. Itenhances participants' transferableskills such as group working, personaldevelopment, and communication.During the week participants willlearn about: the background andphilosophies of participatoryappraisal; examples of projects,which have used the methodology;and how to use the tools andtechniques with confidence in 'realworld' settings.● For further information about this course,please contact: Dr. Duncan Fuller, Division ofGeography and EnvironmentalManagement, Lipman Building, University ofNorthumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle uponTyne, UK. Tel (Direct): +44 (0)191 227 3753;Mobile: +44 (0)7946 401359; Tel (DivisionOffice): +44 (0)191 227 3951; Fax: +44(0)191 227 4715. Email:[email protected]

The foundation course for ToPfacilitation: Group Facilitation Methods 13th – 14th January 2003, London.13th – 14th February 2003,Manchester.

17th – 18th March 2003, Bristol.27th – 28th March 2003, Craigavon.A structured introduction to thebasic ToP Focused Conversation andConsensus Workshop methods. TheFocused Conversation methodconsists of how to: conductpurposeful, productive focusedconversations; capture the wisdomof the group; stimulate feedback;and, reach shared awareness inmeetings. The Consensus WorkshopMethod includes: channel input;how to integrate diverse ideas; builda group consensus; and, developsolutions.● Contact: Martin Gilbraith, ICA: UK,PO Box 171, Manchester, M15 5BE, UK.Tel/fax: +44(0)161 232 8444;Email: [email protected]

A three-day training course: Workingwith Marginalised People30th January, 26th March, 4th June2003, Bristol, UK12th February, 9th April, 18th June2003, Manchester, UKThis is a practical course for peoplewho are working, or wish to work,with groups and individuals who aremarginalised and discriminatedagainst in our society. It will takeaccount of your personaldevelopment by using an actionlearning model. The course will lookat: tools and techniques forengagement; appropriate structuresfor involvement; power relationships;the importance of allies andalliances; and, sustainability.● For further information about this course,please contact: Gail Hart, Tel: +44 (0)161256 1936; Email:[email protected], or PippaAdamson Email: [email protected]


e-participationE-PA

RTICIPATIO

N

Vetwork UKwww.vetwork.org.uk

The Vetwork UK website provides adiscussion forum for veterinarysurgeons, animal welfareprofessionals, and others involved inanimal health care, to facilitatedebate, and information andexperience sharing, in the UK andinternationally, about the developingrole of animal health services,particularly with respect to the linksbetween human, animal, andenvironmental health and welfare.Titles, summaries, short articles, or fulldocuments may be posted on theVetwork website.

New Agriculturalist online: reportingagriculture for the 21st centurywww.new-agri.co.uk/01-1/focuson.html

The New Agriculturalist online presentsFocus On Livestock Health Part Two.From the impacts of livestock onhuman health, to the provision of live-stock services to the poor and the abil-ity to provide techniques andtechnologies that are appropriate foruse by small-scale farmers, the articlescover a selection of the most recentnews, research, and policy develop-ments associated with improving thewell-being of both livestock and thosedependent on them.

Ethnovetwebwww.ethnovetweb.com/documentation.htm

Ethnoveterinary medicine refers topeople’s knowledge, skills, methods,practices, and beliefs about the careof their animals. This websiteintroduces the subject and itsapplications. It also provides some fulltext documents on ethnoveterinarymedicine from different parts of theworld, and information aboutongoing projects with contact details.The website offers updates on eventsand related links.

LIFE: Local livestock forempowerment of rural peoplewww.lifeinitiative.org/

LIFE is a movement supporting ruralcommunities through theconservation and development ofindigenous livestock breeds andspecies, by building on farmers’ andpastoralists’ indigenous knowledgeand institutions, within the context oflocal and regional development.Includes online documents and links.

VETAID: Healthy animals, healthypeoplewww.vetaid.org

VETAID works to strengthen livelihoodstrategies of resource-poor farmers byincreasing the contribution made bytheir livestock, promoting the rightsof farmers and herders, andpartnering and building the capacityof local organisations. VETAID’swebsite offers written and audioresources, the latest news onveterinary issues, and a free VETAIDNewsletter.

LPP: League for Pastoral Peopleswww.pastoralpeoples.org/

LPP is an advocacy and support groupfor pastoralists who depend oncommon property resources. LPPconsiders development from theperspective of the people involvedand, through applied research, aimsto promote local and indigenousknowledge. LPP acts as a resourcecentre for information aboutpastoralists and provides backgroundinformation on livestockdevelopment. The website has fulltext documents, a photo gallery, andlinks.

LEAD: Livestock, Environment andDevelopment Initiativewww.virtualcentre.org

The LEAD Initiative is an inter-

institutional project within thesecretariat of the Food andAgricultural Organization (FAO).LEAD targets the protection andenhancement of natural resources asaffected by livestock productionwhile alleviating poverty. The websitepresents the Livestock andEnvironment Toolbox, an onlinediscussion forum that focuses on theinteractions between livestock andthe environment, a library, and asearch facility.

Democracies Online:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/do-consult/

DO-Consult is a peer-to-peer forumfor those involved with government,parliamentary, and civic onlineconsultations and events. Itencourages professional informationexchange among practitioners andresearchers on the use of the Internetfor public policy consultation, publichearings, and rulemaking processes.It also includes online consultationsand events listings. This is the placeto ask questions, share lessons andinsights, and distribute relevantannouncements. To subscribe email: [email protected]

LogoLink: Citizen participation andlocal governancewww.ids.ac.uk/logolink

LogoLink is a global learning initiativeaimed at strengthening citizenparticipation in local governance.Through a network of partners,LogoLink provides space forexchange, reflection, and research.Coordinated by the ParticipationGroup at the Institute ofDevelopment Studies, it providestools and training materials, LogoLinknewsletters (English, Spanish),bibliographies, research papers,articles, and related weblinks.

RCPL

AN

ETW

ORK


News from the RCPLA Network Steering Group This October, the RCPLA NetworkSteering Group met in Colombo, SriLanka to identify and discuss the futuredirection for, and focus of the Network.

It was agreed that two key themeswould be ‘participation and gover-nance’ and ‘participation and rights’,with each member contributingthrough joint research, workshops, andexchanges. A key question arising fromgovernance work is how effectivepeople’s involvement in influencinggovernment can be, when govern-ments are increasingly undermined byprivatisation. It was seen as essential toforge alliances across networks and or-ganisations, in order to have a largerimpact and to influence policyprocesses by increasing global commit-ments to participatory development byagencies and governments, and rightsbased approaches to developmentwith donors.

The resource centres will continueto be a key function of the network,focusing on issues like grassroots docu-mentation, and sharing experiences,

knowledge, and skills in participationprocesses for qualitative social change.

The Steering group also discussedways of branding the Network,through brochures, the web site, andinternational workshops. The group re-examined the Network objectives, suchas creating a participatory culture thatenables the voices of the poor to beheard.

How can the RCPLA better positionitself so that is considered an authorityon its subject by organisations such asthe World Bank? One strategy consid-ered was to encourage greater involve-ment from development practitioners.Discussions led to the formulation ofan Action Plan that will form the hubof Network activities, strengthen thereputation of the network, and en-hance its online resource capacities.The Network should:• support others in their activities and

create an environment in whichthings happen;

• establish links between participationgroups around the world to allowdevelopment practitioners access toinformation, to improve practices,

and to influence policies;• change the name of the Network to

reflect the changing priorities; and,• design a new Network logo.

The Network expressed its thanksto Awa Faly Ba, who filled the positionof Chair while the RCPLA recruited aNetwork Coordinator; it was agreedthat this interim post was no longernecessary. Also, IIED proposed, and itwas agreed, that the responsibilities ofcoordination and fund managementwere to be devolved to the NetworkCoordinator.

Finally, the steering group agreedthat Tom Thomas, PRAXIS, would holdthe post of Network Coordinator forthe next three years, with a six-monthhandover after two and a half years toanother Southern organisation, whowill succeed PRAXIS as the NetworkCoordinator.

News from IDSContinuing our work with the LinkingRights and Participation project, weheld a methodology workshop at IDSin October. This saw the entire projectteam, from seven countries, coming

In this section, we aim to update readers on activities ofthe Resource Centres for Participatory Learning and ActionNetwork (RCPLA) Network (www.rcpla.org) and itsmembers. For more information please contact the RCPLANetwork Steering Group:RCPLA Coordinator: Tom Thomas, Director, Praxis, S-385,Greater Kailash II, New Delhi – 110 049, India. Tel: +91 11641 8885/ 6/ 7, 623 3525 Fax: +91 11 641 8885/ 6/ 7, 623 3525 Extn: 21. Email: [email protected] Region: Jayatissa Samaranayake, Institute forParticipatory Interaction in Development (IPID), 591Havelock Road, Colombo 06, Sri Lanka. Tel: +94 1 555521;Tel/Fax: +94 1 587361. Email: [email protected] Africa Region: Awa Faly Ba (Interim Network Chair),c/o IIED Programme Sahel, Point E, Rue 6 X A, BP 5579,Dakar, Sénégal. Tel: +221 824 4417; Fax: +221 824 4413.Email: [email protected] European Region: Jane Stevens, Participation Group,Institute of Development Studies (IDS), University of Sussex,

Brighton, BN1 9RE, UK. Tel: + 44 (0)1273 678690; Fax: + 44 (0)1273 21202. Email: [email protected] group website: www.ids.ac.uk/ids/participLatin American Region: Fernando Dick, Dirección deProgramas de Investigación y Desarrollo (DPID), UniversdadNur, Casilla 3273, Ave Cristo Redendor No 100, Santa Cruz,Bolivia. Tel: +591 3 363 939; Fax: +591 3 331 850; Email:[email protected]; Website: http://dpid.nur.edu North Africa & Middle East Region: Ali Mokhtar, Center forDevelopment Services (CDS) 4 Ahmed Pasha Street,Citibank Building, Garden City, Cairo, Egypt, Tel: +20 2 795 7558; Fax: +20 2 794 7278. Email: [email protected] Website: www.neareast.org/explore/cds/index.htm Southern and Eastern Africa Region: John Kennedy,Participatory Methodologies Forum of Kenya (PAMFORK),Jabavu Road, PCEA Jitegemea Flats, Flat No. D3, PO Box2645, KNH Post Office, Nairobi, Kenya. Tel/Fax: +254 2716609. Email: [email protected]

RCPLANetwork

RCPLA Network


RCPLAN

ETWO

RK

together to define the vision, goals,concepts, and methodologies for thecountry studies that they are engagedin, which include both mapping anddocumentation activities. This project isexploring how different kinds of civilsociety actors are interpreting, takingup, and making use of the language ofrights-based development on theground. In particular, it is asking howtraditions of participatory learning andaction might lead to more people-cen-tred rights advocacy, and also howlegal-centred approaches to rights canenhance the advocacy dimensions ofparticipatory development. It also aimsto encourage donors to analyse andapply the links between rights, partici-pation, and power in their work and tobe more effective allies for change atall levels.

The Citizenship DRC (The Develop-ment Research Centre on Citizenship,Participation and Accountability) Work-ing Group on Spaces, Places, and Dy-namics of Citizen Participation recentlyheld its international workshop at IDS,attended by country convenors, re-searchers, and invited outside speak-ers. This group focuses on how director deliberative democratic practicescan strengthen democratic systems tomake them more inclusive, equitable,and accountable. As well as presenta-tions of conceptual work and countrycase studies from Southern DRC part-ners, the workshop included presenta-tions from researchers and activistsworking in the UK and USA, whichprovided an interesting and valuableexchange of experiences. For more de-tails on the DRC’s work seewww.ids.ac.uk/drc-citizen/

November saw the publication byZed Books of ‘Realizing Rights: Trans-forming Approaches to Sexual and Re-productive Wellbeing’ edited byAndrea Cornwall and Alice Welbourn.Copies are available from the IDS

bookshop (email [email protected]). Four new working paperswere published in October, all of whichare available in full text on our website.Limited numbers of many of our publi-cations are available for Southern or-ganisations and resource centres forfree – please contact us for details.

News from PAMFORKThe Kenyan PRSP dilemmaThe process that led to the NationalPoverty Reduction Strategy Paper(PRSP) in Kenya identified good priori-ties whose implementation may leadto improved livelihoods for the poor;such as quality employment; improvedquality of schools and education (equi-table accessability and free primaryschool education); removal of costsharing in public hospitals; and, inclu-sion of the voices of vulnerable groupsinto national political decisions. Mostcritical were those on employment,micro-credit services, community par-ticipation, and corruption. Problemsfaced by poor communities in mostcases relate to low levels of education,unemployment, and limited access tohealth facilities and services.

These priorities reflect the reposi-tory of knowledge that communitieshave on development.

Importantly, some of the prioritiesidentified do not require financial assis-tance or intervention. Developmentactors now need to go back, buildknowledge capacities based on the ex-periences of communities and theirinnate potentials, create self-aware-ness, and work with them using re-sources that are locally available toalleviate problems identified. However,the Kenyan PRSP has not been dissem-inated to communities for validation.Budget allocations given for PRSP pri-orities were less than 10% of the totalbudget.

Hunger is most severe conse-

quence of poverty in both urban andrural communities. During the Partici-patory Poverty Assessments (PPAs)done in ten districts to enlist the voiceof poor people in the PRSP process,most members of the communities didnot know what food security they hadin the event of hunger, and food secu-rity safety nets are needed in poorcommunities. At the same time, agri-cultural policies and research need tobe seriously considered.

Direct interventions addressingPRSP priorities in Kenya are lacking.Those that do exist were initiated ear-lier before the PRSP process. In addi-tion to this, some developmentstakeholders are working on some pri-orities without the knowledge thatthey were priorities identified by thepoor during the PRSP process.

Priorities and needs (of the poor,civil society sector, and internationalpartners) change with time. Delays inimplementing priorities identified, par-ticularly via the PRSP process, impactupon the ability to address what poorpeople in communities need.

News from PRAXISPRAXIS will soon commence with a de-velopment audit of a World Bank Dis-trict Poverty Initiative Programme(DPIP) in Rajasthan, the results ofwhich will feed back to the WorldBank and inform them of the suc-cesses of the project along with theareas that need adjusting. The DPIPaudit will involve participatory work-shops in seven of the poorest districtsin the state that will enable the in-tended beneficiaries to provide obser-vations about the impact of theprogramme initiatives.

This project is an important ap-proach towards assessing and under-standing the impact of povertyalleviation programmes on the lives ofthe poor. It is an excellent opportunity

RCPLA Network


to employ participatory methodologiesto conduct a development audit,where traditionally conventional, pre-dominantly quantitative methods havebeen followed.

In March PRAXIS completed its as-sessment of the Government ofOrissa’s Public Service Delivery at thevillage level, which forms part of theGovernment of India’s public sector re-forms. The assessment found that theservices rarely reached those who re-quired them most i.e. the poorest andmost vulnerable groups in communi-ties. As a consequence, groups arebeing formed to report the effective-ness public service delivery to the Gov-ernment of Orissa. This report is due tobe published in early 2003. It is antici-pated that other states will establishsimilar assessments.

Also this year, PRAXIS completed aParticipatory Poverty Assessment inMadhya Pradesh, commissioned by theAsian Development Bank (ADB) toinform poverty reduction programmes.The study found that caste discrimina-tion continues to hinder progress initia-tives and highlighted prevailing genderdiscrimination.

In addition to the Annual Interna-tional Thematic PRA Training, whichwas held in Hyderabad, PRAXIS haveconducted needs based training withUNICEF’s Water and Sanitation Officerson Community Management, and fa-cilitated a PRA training workshop forActionAid Nigeria, to enhance the Ac-tionAid Nigeria’s capacity in the field ofSexual and Reproductive Health andHIV/AIDS. To compliment the trainingworkshops we have established atraining alumni network, which formsthe crux of the PRAXIS Network.

News from IPIDIPID has noted that in Sri Lanka, ahighly centralised system with mostlytop down decision-making means that

many decision makers talk about par-ticipation, but may lack understandingof what participation is. To change themindset of facilitators and sensitisepeople to participation at the highestlevels, IPID are working with grassrootsorganisations to enable this to happen.

IPID are planning a mainstreamingproject with the World Bank regardingsubsidised services, and increasingpeople’s participation in areas wherethere is little empowerment and toomuch dependency.

Also, IPID’s involvement in a medici-nal plants project has highlighted theneed for policy to address holisticissues, and that in addition to address-ing conservation, it is necessary to in-clude people too. As 85% of peopleuse forest products, their input is crucialif conservation is to work. Conductinga cross-country social capital studyhelped explore how other countriesand communities see things differently.

News from IIEDThis has been a busy year for IIED, cul-minating in the World Summit for Sus-tainable Development (WSSD) inJohannesburg, South Africa. IIEDlaunched several new publications, in-cluding Words into Action, a specialSummit publication, Breaking NewGround, the Mining, Minerals and Sus-tainable Development Programmestudy, and Earthscan Limited, London,UK also published a book called Evi-dence for Hope: the search for sustain-able development, celebrating IIED’sthirtieth anniversary and charting thegrowth of ideas around sustainable de-velopment since the Stockholm Envi-ronment Conference in 1972, up tothe Summit this year.

The Sustainable Agriculture andRural Livelihoods Programme, amongstother titles, have published and editedPeople-oriented approaches to globalconservation: is the leopard changing

its spots? The paper is the first in anew series, Institutionalising Participa-tion, edited by Michel Pimbert of IIED.The series will publish the main find-ings of the Institutionalising Participa-tion Project, including case studiesfrom West Africa, India, Indonesia, andMexico.

News from IIED SahelSenegal has a new programme con-centrating on the issues surroundingdecentralisation in Senegal, BurkinoFaso, Mali, and Niger, where govern-ments are making local governmentbodies more independent.

IIED Senegal can work on an indi-vidual level to provide access to infor-mation about the decentralisationprocess; they can help make the gov-ernment more receptive to public par-ticipation and to grassrootsparticipation; and, can help informpolicy makers of what is occurring at alocal level. Another project involves en-abling pastoralists and nomads toenter power structures; decentralisa-tion is an opportunity for such efforts.

IIED Senegal have also edited abook on how to harness informationresources to help people influencepolicy.

News from CDSCDS have adopted the term ‘collabora-tive community action’ to refer to proj-ects, and are now looking at issuessurrounding the interactions betweengroups, such as how NGOs relate togovernment, documenting and dis-seminating information, and how tohelp NGOs document their ownprocesses. They have also established anew volunteer centre that databasesand matches volunteers with NGOs,whilst monitoring the success/satisfac-tion of the match. They have made750 matches in Cairo in three monthssince the project started.

RCPL

AN

ETW

ORK


PLA Notes is published three times a year, and is available free of charge to non-OECD organisations and individuals based in non-OECD countries.‡

Prices: OECD† Individual One year – £25 or US$40 Two years – £45 or US$72 OECD† Institutional One year – £75 or US$120 Two years – £140 or US$224

Please note that all free subscribers will be contacted every two years/six issues to renew their free subscription. Due to costrestrictions, and to reach as many readers as possible, we request that where possible, organisations share a free subscription orask their organisation’s library or resource centre to subscribe.

Special rates are available for bulk subscriptions on request.

Please indicate what type of organisation you work for:

Please indicate what your area of work/interests are:

pla notes subscriptions

order formReturn to: PLA NotesSubscriptions, EarthprintLimited, Orders Department,PO Box 119, Stevenage,SG1 4TP, UK.

Tel: +44 (0)1438 748111Fax: +44 (0)1438 748844Email: [email protected] at www.planotes.org

For more information aboutthe series please contact us atthe above address or visitwww.planotes.org

First Name: Surname:

Organisation:

Address:

Postal Code/PO Box: Country:

Tel: Fax: Email:

† OECD countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico,The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, U.K., U.S.A. Individual subscriptions are those paid from individual’sown pockets and not reimbursed by an institution. ‡ Non-OECD: Due to cost restrictions this excludes branches or regional offices of Northern-based organisations in non-OECD countries and non-OECDorganisations and individuals based in OECD countries.

Payment information

■■ I am from a non-OECD country and would like a free subscription‡

■■ I enclose an international money order or US$ cheque drawn on a US bank account to the value of:

■■ I enclose a UK cheque to the value of:

Cheques should be made payable to Earthprint Limited

■■ Please debit my credit card to the value of: ■■ VISA ■■ Mastercard ■■ American Express

Credit Card Number: Expiry Date:

Holder’s Name: Signature:

Card Address (if different from above):

■■ Please send my institution an invoice

Quantity Price at individual/ institutional rate Total Price

US$

£

£



Organisation:

Address:


Tel: Fax: Email:

Prices: OECD† individuals and all non-OECD‡: US$75.00 (£50) OECD institutions: US$225.00 (£150)Special rates are available for bulk copies and the intranet. Contact IIED ([email protected]) for details.

† OECD countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg,Mexico, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, U.K., U.S.A. Individual subscriptions are those paidfrom individual’s own pockets and not reimbursed by an institution. ‡ Non-OECD: this excludes branches or regional offices of Northern-based organisations in non-OECD countries

Shipping charges: UK US$5 for the first item; US$2.50 for each additional item; Europe US$6 for the first item; US$3 foreach additional item Rest of the world US$10 for the first item; US$5 for each additional item.

Payment information

! I enclose an international money order or US$ cheque drawn on a US bank account to the value of:

! I enclose a UK cheque to the value of (use an exchange rate of US$1.45 to £1):


Please debit my credit card to the value of: ! VISA ! Mastercard ! American Express



Card Address (if different from above):

! Please send my institution an invoice

pla notes CD-ROM order form

Quantity

Price at individual/ institutional rate

Shipping charge

VAT at 17.5% (UK Customers only)

Total Price

US$

£

US$

This new CD-ROM covers issues 1 to 40 of RRA/PLA Notes – over 500 articles in total. It includes all the recent,popular Special Issues such as Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation, Community Water Management andDeliberative Democracy and Citizen Empowerment (see back issues order form), as well as general issues coveringa wide variety of topics and tools. A powerful search engine allows users to search by key words for particularthemes or authors, and printable, full text versions of all articles are included in portable document format (PDF).PLA Notes on CD-ROM will be an invaluable resource for practitioners, academics, policy makers, and studentsinterested in the potential and practical use of participatory approaches and tools.

System requirements: Windows 95/98 or NT/2000. All other software required is included with the CD-ROM. To order your copy of the PLA Notes CD-ROM, please complete and return the form below to:

Earthprint Limited, Orders Department, PO Box 119, Stevenage, Hertfordshire SG1 4TP, UK. Tel: +44 (0)1438748111; Fax: +44 (0)1438 748844; email: [email protected], or order online from www.earthprint.com


Order no: Quantity required

PLA Notes 45: Oct 2002 US$22.50 9218 IIED Community-based animal health care..........................................■PLA Notes 44: Jun 2002 US$22.50 9216 IIED Local government and participation ............................................■PLA Notes 43: Feb 2002 US$22.50 9133 IIED Advocacy and citizen participation ..............................................■PLA Notes 42: Oct 2001 US$22.50 9113 IIED Children’s participation – evaluating effectiveness ....................■PLA Notes 40: Feb 2001 US$22.50 6345 IIED Deliberative democracy and citizen empowerment ..................■PLA Notes 39: Oct 2000 US$18.00 6344 IIED Popular communications ..............................................................■PLA Notes 38: Jun 2000 US$18.00 6341 IIED Participatory processes in the North ............................................■PLA Notes 37: Feb 2000 US$18.00 6335 IIED Sexual and reproductive health ....................................................■PLA Notes 35: Jun 1999 US$18.00 6154 IIED Community water management ..................................................■PLA Notes 34: Feb 1999 US$18.00 6150 IIED Learning from analysis ..................................................................■PLA Notes 33: Oct 1998 US$18.00 6143 IIED Understanding market opportunities ..........................................■PLA Notes 32: Jun 1998 US$18.00 6137 IIED Participation, literacy and empowerment ..................................■PLA Notes 31: Feb 1998 US$18.00 6131 IIED Participatory monitoring and evaluation ....................................■PLA Notes 30: Oct 1997 US$18.00 6129 IIED Participation and fishing communities ........................................■PLA Notes 29: Jun 1997 US$18.00 6123 IIED Performance and participation ....................................................■PLA Notes 28: Feb 1997 US$18.00 6115 IIED Methodological complementarity ................................................■PLA Notes 27: Oct 1996 US$18.00 6114 IIED Participation, policy and institutionalisation ..............................■PLA Notes 25: Feb 1996 US$18.00 6099 IIED Children’s participation..................................................................■PLA Notes 24: Oct 1995 US$18.00 6093 IIED Critical reflections from practice ..................................................■PLA Notes 23: Jun 1995 US$18.00 6092 IIED Participatory approaches to HIV/AIDs programmes....................■RRA Notes 21: Nov 1994 US$18.00 6090 IIED Participatory tools and methods in urban areas ........................■RRA Notes 20: Apr 1994 US$18.00 6089 IIED Livestock ..........................................................................................■RRA Notes 19: Feb 1994 US$18.00 6088 IIED Training............................................................................................■RRA Notes 16 Jul 1992 US$18.00 6085 IIED Applications for health ..................................................................■RRA Notes 15: May 1992 US$18.00 6084 IIED Wealth ranking ..............................................................................■For a full list of RRA/PLA Notes back issues available to buy please visit our website www.planotes.org or contact Earthprint Ltd

Return to: Earthprint Ltd. PO Box 119, Stevenage, Hertfordshire SG1 4TP, UK. Tel: +44 (0)1438 748111; Fax: +44 (0)1438 748844; Email: [email protected]; Website: www.planotes.org or www.earthprint.com


Organisation:

Address:


Tel: Fax: Email:

Save 15% by ordering a full set of back copies (PLA/RRA Notes 1-45 US $711.00)Please note that due to cost restrictions we are unable to supply, or respond to requests for, free copies of back issues.Shipping charges: UK US$5 for the first item; US$2.50 for each additional item; Europe US$6 for the first item; US$3 foreach additional item Rest of the world US$10 for the first item; US$5 for each additional item.

Payment information■■ I enclose an international money order or US$ cheque drawn on a US bank account to the value of: ■■ I enclose a UK cheque to the value of (use an exchange rate of US$1.45 to £1):


Please debit my credit card to the value of: ■■ VISA ■■ Mastercard ■■ American Express



Card Address (if different from above):■■ Please send my institution an invoice

planotes special issues

order form

Do you wish your details to be disclosed to others? Yes/No

planotes4444 4444 44 44 44 44 44 44

participatory learning and action

June 2002

Local government

and participation

£

£

US$

Other related publications from IIEDIN

TO

UCH


Relatedpublicationsfrom IIEDAvailable from: Earthprint Ltd, PO Box 119,Stevenage, SG1 4TP, UK or Fax: +44 (0)1438 748844 Email: [email protected] Website: www.earthprint.com.

Participatorylearning andaction:a trainer’sguide Jules N Pretty,Irene Guijt, JohnThompson, IanScoones

Designed for both experienced andnew trainers, who have an interest intraining others in the use ofparticipatory methods, whether theyare researchers, practitioners, policy-makers, villagers or trainers. Theguide provides a comprehensivebackground to the principles of adultlearning and details 101 interactivetraining games and exercises. ● IIED Sustainable Agriculture and RuralLivelihoods Programme, 1995. Alsoavailable in Spanish. ISBN: 1899825002.Order no: 6021IIED. Price: USD 31.50

Methods on themove: a reviewof veterinaryuses ofparticipatoryapproaches andmethodsfocusing onexperiences indrylands Africa.

Andy CatleyParticipatory epidemiology is arelatively new branch of veterinary

medicine. This literature reviewdescribes the origins of participatoryapproaches and methods, anddiscusses their application in animalhealth services and research in lessdeveloped countries, particularly indryland Africa. In these areas, mostexperience with veterinary uses ofparticipatory approaches andmethods resides with community-based animal health projects, whichhave proved to be effective relativeto conventional approaches. Thisbook will be interest to practitioners,trainers, and donors alike. Alsoavailable online in portabledocument format (PDF) atwww.iied.org/pdf/methods_on_the_move.pdf ● IIED Sustainable Agriculture and RuralLivelihoods Programme, 1999. Order no:6337IIED. Price: £15.95

Where there is no data: participa-tory approaches to veterinaryepidemiology in pastoral areas ofthe Horn of Africa.Issue paper no. 110Andy Catley and Jeffrey MarinerThis paper provides an overview ofrecent experiences with the use ofparticipatory approaches andmethods to understand livestockdiseases in pastoral areas, includingthe emergence of participatoryepidemiology as a distinct branch ofveterinary epidemiology studies onthe validity and reliability ofparticipatory methods. It discusseshow participatory assessment cancomplement conventional systems ofveterinary inquiry and outlines plansto integrate conventional systems ofveterinary participatory epidemiologyinto national veterinary epidemiologyunits. ● IIED Drylands Programme, May 2002ISSN: 1357 9312. Order no: 9179IIEDPrice: OECD: USD 5/free to non-OECD

Participatorydiagnosis of soilnutrient depletionin semi-arid areasof Kenya.Managing Africa’s SoilsNo. 26. L.N. Gachimbi,A. de Jager, H. van

Keulen, E.G. Thuranira and S.M. NandwaThis paper describes the participatorydiagnostic process undertaken todevelop improved land and watermanagement techniques in semi-aridareas of Kenya, to enable farmersand researchers to better understandthe possibilities for maintaining soilfertility and increasing sustainableoutput in the harsh ecological andeconomic conditions prevalent in thearea.● IIED Drylands Programme, March 2002 ISSN: 1560 3520. Order no: 9137IIEDPrice: OECD: USD 7/ free to non-OECD.

Transforming bureaucracies:institutionalising participatoryapproaches and processes fornatural resource management: anannotated bibliography.Bainbridge V, Foerster S, Pasteur K, PimbertM, Pratt G, Iliana Yaschine ArroyoThis bibliography is part of a projectto examine the dynamics ofinstitutionalising people-centredprocesses and scaling upparticipatory approaches in large,public bureaucracies for naturalresource management. TransformingBureaucracies aims to highlightconceptual issues, gender,environmental knowledge, policychange, learning, changing attitudesand behaviour, impact andinstitutional analysis. ● IIED Sustainable Agriculture and RuralLivelihoods Programme, IDS 2000.ISBN: 1899825614. Order no: 6342IIED.Price: OECD: USD 45.00 or non-OECD:USD 30.00.

45 planotes 45 participatory learning and action 45 ...are you new to participatory learning and...

Documents