4643two way slabs1

Upload: ho-chee-siang

Post on 01-Jun-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    1/75

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    2/75

    Comparison of One-way and Two-way

    slab behavior 

    One-way slabs carry load in

    one direction.

    Two-way slabs carry load intwo directions.

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    3/75

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    4/75

    Comparison of One-way and Two-way

    slab behavior 

    Flat slab Two-way slab with beams

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    5/75

    Comparison of One-way and Two-way slab

     behavior 

    For flat plates and slabs the column connections can vary

     between:

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    6/75

    Comparison of One-way and Two-way

    slab behavior 

    Flat Plate Waffle slab

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    7/75

    Comparison of One-way and Two-way

    slab behavior

    The two-way ribbed slab and waffled slab system: eneral

    thic!ness of the slab is " to #$cm.

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    8/75

    Comparison of One-way and Two-way slab

     behavior %conomic Choices

    Flat Plate &for relatively li'ht loads as in apartments or offices(

    suitable span )."m to *.$m with ++, -"/0m1.

     Advantages

    +ow cost formwor! 

    %2posed flat ceilin's

    Fast

     Disadvantages +ow shear capacity

    +ow Stiffness &notable deflection(

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    9/75

    Comparison of One-way and Two-way slab

     behavior %conomic Choices

    Flat Slab &for heavy industrial loads( suitable span * to 3m with

    ++, "-4."/0m1.

     Advantages

    +ow cost formwor! 

    %2posed flat ceilin's

    Fast Disadvantages

     /eed more formwor! for capital and panels

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    10/75

    Comparison of One-way and Two-way slab

     behavior %conomic Choices

    Waffle Slab &two-way 5oist system( suitable span 4."m to #1m

    with ++, )-4."/0m1.

     Advantages

    Carries heavy loads

    6ttractive e2posed ceilin's

    Fast

     Disadvantages Formwor! with panels is e2pensive

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    11/75

    Comparison of One-way and Two-way slab

     behavior %conomic Choices

    One-way Slab on beams suitable span to *m with ++, -"/0m1.

    Can be used for lar'er spans with relatively hi'her cost and hi'herdeflections

    One-way 5oist system suitable span * to 3m with ++, )-*/0m1.

    7eep ribs8 the concrete and steel 9uantities are relative low

    %2pensive formwor! e2pected.

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    12/75

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    13/75

    ?ehaviour of slabs loaded to

    failure p*1)-*14

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    14/75

    Comparison of One-way and Two-way slab

     behavior 

    ws ,load ta!en by short direction

    wl , load ta!en by lon' direction

    δ6 ,

    δ? 

    Rule of Thumb: For ?06 @ 18

    desi'n as one-way slab

     EI 

     Bw

     EI 

     Aw

    A)

    "

    A)

    " )l)

    s =

    ls)

    )

    l

    s

    #*16?For ww A

     B

    w

    w

    =⇒==

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    15/75

    Two-Way Slab 7esi'n

    Static Equilibrium of Two-Way Slabs

    6nalo'y of two-way slab to plan! and beam floor 

    Section 6-6:

    Boment per m width in plan!s

    Total Boment

    1

    #  !/-m0mA

    wl m⇒ =

    ( )

    1

    #

    6-6 1  !/-mA

     M wl ⇒ =

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    16/75

    Two-Way Slab 7esi'n

    Static Equilibrium of Two-Way Slabs

    6nalo'y of two-way slab to plan! and beam floor 

    niform load on each beam

    Boment in one beam &Sec: ?-?(1

    # 1lb  !/.m

    1 A

    wl l  M 

       ⇒ =   ÷  

    #  !/0m1

    wl ⇒

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    17/75

    Two-Way Slab 7esi'n

    Static Equilibrium of Two-Way Slabs

    Total Boment in both beams

    Full load was transferred east-west by the plan!s and then wastransferred north-south by the beamsD

    The same is true for a two-way slab or any other floor system

    where:

    ( )1

    1#  !/.m

    A B B

    l  M wl −⇒ =

    ( ) ( )

    1 1

    # 1

    6-6 1 #

    !/-m8 !/.mA A B B

    l l  M wl M wl 

    −= =

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    18/75

    7istribution of moments in slabs

    Read p631-637

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    19/75

    eneral 7esi'n Concepts

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    20/75

    eneral 7esi'n Concepts

    &1( %9uivalent Frame Bethod &%FB(

    6 7 buildin' is divided into a series of 17 e9uivalent

    frames by cuttin' the buildin' alon' lines midway

     between columns. The resultin' frames are consideredseparately in the lon'itudinal and transverse directions of

    the buildin' and treated floor by floor.

    +imited to slab systems to uniformly distributed loads andsupported on e9ually spaced columns. Bethod uses a set

    of coefficients to determine the desi'n moment at critical

    sections.

    ( 7irect 7esi'n Bethod &77B(

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    21/75

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    22/75

    %9uivalent Frame Bethod &%FB( 

    %levation of the frame Perspective view

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    23/75

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    24/75

    Bethods of 6nalysis

    &1( Plastic 6nalysis

    The yield method  used to determine the limit state of slab by

    considerin' the yield lines that occur in the slab as a collapse

    mechanism.

    The strip method 8 where slab is divided into strips and the

    load on the slab is distributed in two ortho'onal directions

    and the strips are analy>ed as beams.

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    25/75

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    26/75

    Column and Biddle Strips

    The slab is bro!en up

    into column and

    middle strips for

    analysis

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    27/75

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    28/75

    ?asic Steps in Two-way Slab 7esi'n

    ). Calculate positive and ne'ative moments in the slab.". 7etermine distribution of moments across the width of the

    slab. ?ased on 'eometry and beam stiffness.

    *. 6ssi'n a portion of moment to beams8 if present.

    4. 7esi'n reinforcement for moments from steps " and *. Steps-4 need to be done for both principal directions.

    A. Chec! shear stren'ths at the columns

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    29/75

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    30/75

    7efinition of ?eam-to-Slab Stiffness Eatio8 α

    With width bounded laterally by centerline of ad5acent

     panels on each side of the beam.

    cb b cb b

    cs s cs s

    )% 0 %

    )% 0 % f  

     I l I 

     I l I α    = =

    slabuncrac!edof inertiaof Boment;

     beamuncrac!edof inertiaof Boment;

    concreteslabof elasticityof Bodulus%concrete beamof elasticityof Bodulus%

    s

     b

    sb

    cb

    =

    ===

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    31/75

    ?eam and Slab Sections for calculation of α

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    32/75

    ?eam and Slab Sections for calculation of α

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    33/75

    ?eam and Slab Sections for calculation of α

    7efinition of beam cross-section

    Charts may be used to calculate α

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    34/75

    %2ample #-#

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    35/75

    Binimum Slab Thic!ness for Two-way

    Construction

    The 6C; Code 3.". specifies a minimum slab thic!ness to

    control deflection. There are three empirical limitations for

    calculatin' the slab thic!ness &h(8 which are based on

    e2perimental research. ;f these limitations are not met8 it will be

    necessary to compute deflection.

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    36/75

    Binimum Slab Thic!ness for Two-way

    Construction

    f $.1 1α ≤ ≤&a( For 

    ( )

    y

    n

    fm

    $.A#)$$

    * " $.1

     f  l 

    hβ α 

     +

    ÷  =+ −

     f  y in BPa. ?ut not less than #1."cm

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    37/75

    Binimum Slab Thic!ness for Two-way

    Construction

    fm1   α 

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    38/75

    Binimum Slab Thic!ness for 1-way Construction

    fm $.1α   

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    39/75

    Binimum Slab Thic!ness for two-way

    construction

    The definitions of the terms are:

    h , Binimum slab thic!ness without interior beams

    ln ,Clear span in the lon' direction measured face to face

    of column

    β = the ratio of the lon' to short clear span

    αfm,the avera'e value of α for all beams on the sides ofthe panel.

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    40/75

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    41/75

    7irect 7esi'n Bethod for Two-way Slab

    +imitations on use of 7irect 7esi'n method

    . Successive span in each direction shall not differ by more

    than #0 the lon'er span.

    ). Columns may be offset from the basic rectan'ular 'rid ofthe buildin' by up to $.# times the span parallel to the offset.

    ". 6ll loads must be due to 'ravity only &/06 to unbraced

    laterally loaded frames8 foundation mats or pre-stressedslabs(

    *. Service &unfactored( live load 1 service dead load≤

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    42/75

    7irect 7esi'n Bethod for Two-way Slab

    4. For panels with beams between supports on all sides8 relative

    stiffness of the beams in the 1 perpendicular directions.

    Shall not be less than $.1 nor 'reater than ".$

    +imitations 1 and 4 do not allow use of 77B for slab panels

    that transmit loads as one way slabs.

    +imitations on use of 7irect 7esi'n method

    1# 1

    1

    1 #

     f  

     f  

    l l 

    α α 

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    43/75

    7istribution of Boments

    Slab is considered to be a series of frames in two directions:

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    44/75

    7istribution of Boments

    Total static Boment8  M o

    ( )-#6C; 

    A

    1

    n1u$

    l l w M   =

    ( )cn

    n

    1

    u

    $.AA*dhusin'calc.columns8circularfor

    columns betweenspanclear

    striptheof widthetransvers

    areaunit perloadfactored

    ==

    =

    =

    wwhere

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    45/75

    %2ample #.1

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    46/75

    Column Strips and Biddle Strips

    Boments vary across width of slab panel

    7esi'n moments are avera'ed over the width

    of column strips over the columns middle

    strips between column strips.∴

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    47/75

    Column Strips and

    Biddle Strips

    Column strips 7esi'n

    width on either side of a

    column centerline e9ual to

    smaller of

    #

    1

     1".$

     1".$

    l#, len'th of span in

    direction moments are bein' determined.

    l1, len'th of span

    transverse to l# 

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    48/75

    Column Strips

    and Biddle

    StripsBiddle strips: 7esi'n

    strip bounded by two

    column strips.

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    49/75

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    50/75

    Boment 7istribution

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    51/75

    7istribution of B$ 

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    52/75

    Positive and /e'ative Boments in Panels

    B$ is divided into G B and -B Eules 'iven in 6C; sec. #.*.

    ( ) A 

    1

    n1u

    $av'uu

    l l w

     M  M  M    =≥−+⊕

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    53/75

    Transverse 7istribution of Boments

    The lon'itudinal moment values mentioned are for the entire

    width of the e9uivalent buildin' frame. The width of two half

    column strips and two half-middle stripes of ad5acent panels.

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    54/75

    Transverse 7istribution of Boments

    Transverse distribution of the lon'itudinal moments to middle andcolumn strips is a function of the ratio of len'th l10l#8αf#8 and bt.

    torsional constant

    cb b cb# t

    cs s cs s

     1

    $.*

    #

     f   E I E C 

     E I E I 

     x x y

    C   y

    α β = =

       = −   ÷ ÷     ∑

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    55/75

    7istribution of B$ 

    6C; Sec #.*..)

    For spans framin' into a common support ne'ative moment

    sections shall be desi'ned to resist the lar'er of the 1 interior B u=s

    6C; Sec. #.*.."

    %d'e beams or ed'es of slab shall be proportioned to resist in

    torsion their share of e2terior ne'ative factored moments

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    56/75

    Factored Boment

    in Column Strip

    F t d B t i C l St i

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    57/75

    Factored Boment in Column Strip

    Eatio of torsional stiffness of ed'e beam to fle2ural stiffness of

    slab&width, to beam len'th(

    βt

    =

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    58/75

    Factored Boments

    Factored Boments in

     beams &6C; Sec.

    #.*.(: resist a

     percenta'e of columnstrip moment plus

    moments due to loads

    applied directly to

     beams.

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    59/75

    Factored Boments

    Factored Boments in Biddle strips &6C; Sec. #.*.(

    The portion of the G Bu and - Bu not resisted by column

    strips shall be proportionately assi'ned to correspondin' halfmiddle strips.

    %ach middle strip shall be proportioned to resist the sum of

    the moments assi'ned to its 1 half middle strips.

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    60/75

    %2ample #- and #-) pa'e *"$

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    61/75

    6C; Provisions for %ffects of Pattern +oads

    T f f l

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    62/75

    Transfer of moments to columns

    %2terior columns shall be desi'ned for $.Bo assumed

    to be about the centroid of the shear perimeter8 and should be

    divided between columns above and below the slab in proportion to

    their stiffnesses.

    ;nterior Columns: refer to te2tboo! pa'e *"4

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    63/75

    Shear Stren'th of Slabs

    ;n two-way floor systems8 the slab must have ade9uate thic!nessto resist both bendin' moments and shear forces at critical section.

    There are three cases to loo! at for shear.

    #. Two-way Slabs supported on beams

    1. Two-Way Slabs without beams

    . Shear Eeinforcement in two-way slabs without beams.

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    64/75

    Shear Stren'th of Slabs

    #. Two-way slabs supported on beams

    The critical location is found at d distance from the column8 where

    The supportin' beams are stiffand are capable of transmittin' floor loads to the columns.

    ( )c c   0 *V f bd  φ φ =

    Sh St th f Sl b

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    65/75

    Shear Stren'th of Slabs

    There are two types of shear that need to be addressed

    1. Two-Way Slabs without beams

    #. One-way shear or beam shear at distance d from the column

    1. Two-way or punch out shear which occurs alon' a truncated

    cone.

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    66/75

    Shear Stren'th of Slabs

    One-way shear considers critical section a distance d from the

    column and the slab is considered as a wide beam spannin'

     between supports.

    ( )ud c c   0 *V V f bd  φ φ ≤ =

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    67/75

    Shear Stren'th of Slabs

    Two-way shear fails alon' a a truncated cone or pyramid around the

    column. The critical section is located d01 from the column face8

    column capital8 or drop panel.

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    68/75

    Shear Stren'th of SlabsShear Stren'th of Slabs

    ;f shear reinforcement is not provided8 the shear stren'th ofconcrete is the smaller of:

    #.

    1.

     bo , perimeter of the critical section

     βc ,ratio of lon' side of column to short side

    ( )c c o c o

    c

    1$.#4 # $.V f b d f b d  φ φ φ 

    β 

     = + ≤

    ÷  

    sc c o

    o

    $.$A 1d V f b d  b

    α φ φ   = + ÷  

    αs is )$ for interior columns8 $ for ed'e columns8 and 1$ for

    corner columns.

    Sh St th f Sl b

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    69/75

    Shear Stren'th of Slabs

    . Shear Eeinforcement in two-way slabs without beams.

    For plates and flat slabs8 which do not meet the condition for

    shear8 one can either 

    -;ncrease slab thic!ness

    - 6dd reinforcement

    Eeinforcement can be done by shearheads8 anchor bars8conventional stirrup ca'es and studded steel strips &see 6C;

    ##.##.).

    Sh St th f Sl b

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    70/75

    Shear Stren'th of Slabs

    Shearhead consists of steel ;-beams or channel welded into four

    cross arms to be placed in slab above a column. 7oesnot apply to e2ternal columns due to lateral loads and

    torsion.

    Sh St th f Sl b

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    71/75

    Shear Stren'th of Slabs

    6nchor bars consists of steel reinforcement rods or bent barreinforcement

    Sh St th f Sl b

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    72/75

    Shear Stren'th of Slabs

    Conventional stirrup ca'es

    Sh St th f Sl b

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    73/75

    Shear Stren'th of Slabs

    Studded steel strips

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    74/75

    Eeinforcement 7etails +oads

    6fter all percenta'es of the static moments in the column and middle

    strip are determined8 the steel reinforcement can be calculated for

    ne'ative and positive moments in each strip.

    Ba2imum Spacin' of Eeinforcement

    6t points of ma2. G0- B:

    Bin Eeinforcement Ee9uirements

    ( )

    ( )

    1 6C; #..1

    and )" 6C; 4.#1.

     s t 

     s cm

    ( ) ( )   ( )s min s TFS  from 6C; 4.#1 6C; #..# A A=

    Binimum e2tension for reinforcement in

  • 8/9/2019 4643Two Way Slabs1

    75/75

    slabs without beams&Fi'. #..A(