4794.900 elmhurst cbd parking study 10-4-13

PARKING STUDY To: Mr. Michael Kopp City of Elmhurst Assistant Manager From: Kelly Conolly, P.E. Transportation Engineer Tim Doron Director of Transportation Planning Bill Grieve, P.E., PTOE Senior Transportation Engineer Date: October 4, 2013 Subject: Central Business District Parking Study Elmhurst, Illinois PART I. INTRODUCTION GEWALT HAMILTON ASSOCIATES, INC. (GHA) in association with Houseal Lavigne Associates (HLA) has conducted a parking study for the City of Elmhurst of their Central Business District (CBD). The following report summarizes our findings and recommendations for your consideration. The Exhibits and Appendices referenced throughout are located at the end of this document. Project Context Over the years, the City of Elmhurst has transitioned from a medium sized inner ring suburban city to a vibrant community. Currently the population of over 44,000 is served by a number of nearby commercial and entertainment venues. However, of prime importance is the transit oriented, well developed Central Business District (CBD). The downtown has experienced robust growth in both its multifamily residences, as well as nationally recognized and local retailers. The City, as a matter of policy, has devoted time and resources to attract high quality retailers, as well as other related land uses to support them. Parking in the City’s CBD is one of the key elements to the success of its commercial establishments. Although parking supply, both on-street and in lots, is exceptional as compared to other downtown locations, the success and vibrancy of its stores and other uses push the limits at certain times for adequate supply. Additionally, Metra commuter rail serves the City with the station located in the center of the CBD. Parking is available to the public after 5PM. For purposes of this study, the CBD is the C-4 zoning district roughly defined as a two to three block area in all directions centered on the Metra rail crossing at York Street. Exhibit 1 shows the CBD and various analysis blocks which comprise the study area.

Central Business District Parking Study City of Elmhurst

Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. –

The City is positioned to enhance the downtown by virtue of some strategic redevelopment sites. Recognizing the importance of adequate and convenient parking to commercial viability, the City has embarked on a continuing effort to ensure future sufficient supply. As such, a new parking deck is to be built on the east side of Addison Avenue, between First and Second Streets. The following parking study will assist in sizing the garage appropriately and is part of an overall plan and strategy for the future. Study Objectives

Determine the existing public parking supply and demand tendencies in the study area by walkable “zones”.

Identify the distance a person (shopper/diner) will walk from a parking area or lot to a destination using nationally recognized best practices.

Identify redevelopment sites in the CBD and provide potential use and size information. Estimate future parking generation associated with the redevelopment sites using the concept of shared

parking - a model that determines demand by hour as not all uses peak at the same time. Clearly identify surpluses or deficits within reasonable walkable “zones.” Provide a recommendation on the number of parking spaces that should be provided in the new deck.

Resources and References The following resources were referenced. All of these are considered industry standards and best practices.

Urban Land Institute, Shared Parking, 2nd Edition, 2005 Institute of Transportation Engineers’, Traffic Engineering Handbook, 6th Edition, 2010 ENO Foundation, Parking, Herbert S. Levinson and Robert A. Weant 1990

PART II. METHODOLOGY This report addresses existing and future supply and demand for publicly owned spaces. It does not include privately owned lots. Over the past several years, the City had performed a number of parking occupancy counts at all municipal parking facilities including parking lots, garages, and on-street locations. This data was used as a base for current or existing conditions, the identification of current surpluses or deficits, and for calculations of future demand. Future demand means parking required based on existing demand plus the redevelopment of several parcels of property in the CBD. The following details the study approach. Existing Conditions Utilize staff identified public parking supply sorted by customer/employee, commuter, and on-street Group blocks by zones (four zones) based on reasonable walkability, best practices including Level of

Service (LOS) Identify peak hours of usage and determine the two peak periods Identify current surpluses or deficits



Evaluation of Future Conditions Identify redevelopment site options Determine walking distances using LOS standards as identified above Model future parking demand generated by those sites using the shared parking concept Combine redevelopment demand with existing utilization of public parking by hour to determine total peak Compare total future demand to the available supply by zone Determine deficits or surpluses by zone Assumes any residential will provide its own parking

The focal point for the study of future conditions is a possible multi story parking garage located on the east side of Addison Avenue approximately mid block, between First and Second Streets. The projected usage of that garage is based on a number of factors, of which walking distance is perhaps the most important. Accordingly, the CBD was divided into four zones that generally reflected various degrees of “walkability” to and from the proposed garage. Each zone included 3-4 city blocks. This walkability factor was determined by best practices and engineering judgment which included standards as defined by the Urban Land Institute’s Shared Parking Manual. The standards define a walkable level of service (LOS) which essentially quantifies a diminishment in the number of users of a facility the further away from it that the parker’s destination is located. The LOS factor is important as it determines usage by percentage. Specifically the report follows the following approach: Walking Radius LOS

LOS A LOS B LOS C Walking radius 400 ft. 800 ft. 1200 ft. Utilization by Patrons 85% 40% 25% Utilization by Employees 95% 70% 50%

PART III. EXISTING CONDITONS Existing Parking Supply and Demand The study area contains a total of 2,033 public parking spaces (source: City of Elmhurst). They are located on-street, in lots and in garages. The two hours of usage of those spaces that this study focused on were 1-2 PM and 7-8 PM. These spaces are generally open to the public all day with the exception of the Metra spaces which only become available to non-Metra users after 5 PM. During the two 1-hour time periods the following number of spaces were occupied: 1-2 PM - 1,478 spaces occupied 73% occupancy (includes Metra parkers) 7-8 PM - 770 spaces occupied 38% occupancy (Metra spaces open to public parkers)

During the peak afternoon 1-2 PM period, on-street parking is heavily utilized (by observation) especially in the prime commercial district along and adjacent to York Street. During the evening hours, when Metra spaces become available, overall CBD occupancy is less. However, a further breakdown of parking demand by zones indicates that some adjacent to restaurants and entertainment venues are heavily utilized.



The CBD was broken into four zones (A-D) each of which contained 3-4 blocks. These zones, as well as their existing supply, and occupancy are shown on Exhibit 2. The zones represented logical geographical groupings that would represent an area (zone) where a shopper or diner would park with the intention of using a commercial establishment in that zone. The occupancy, as well as the surplus, of each zone is also shown on the Exhibit. As shown, demand is heavy in some zones but overall surplus capacity exists. PART IV. FUTURE DEMAND Redevelopment Sites Houseal Lavigne Associates provided redevelopment information for eight redevelopment sites identified by the City and shown in Exhibit 3. The sites are summarized by probable land use and density assumptions. These were utilized to develop future parking demand.

Site #1 (195-197 Addison Avenue): Restaurant/Bar – 12,000 square feet Site #2 (168 Addison Avenue/145 Second Street): Retail – 12,000 square feet Second Floor Office – 12,000 square feet Site #3 (Municipal Lot west side Addison Avenue): Restaurant/Bar – 15,000 square feet Second Floor Office – 15,000 square feet Site #4 (135-149 Addison Avenue): Proposed Parking Garage Retail – 17,500 square feet Site #5 (109 W. Schiller Court): Second Floor Entertainment – 6,000 square feet Site #6 (130-134 N. York Street): Restaurant – 19,000 square feet Site #7 (100 Addison Avenue): Retail – 32,000 square feet Site #8 (105 Cottage Hill Avenue): Retail – 20,000 square feet Second Floor Medical Office – 20,000 square feet

Parking Demand of Redevelopment Sites Each site was subjected to a shared parking analysis. Standards for this were applied based on those identified in the ULI Shared parking manual. Essentially this analysis tabulates peak hours and demand using the assumption that multiple uses within a site will not necessarily have peak demands at the same time, thus avoiding overbuilding expensive parking spaces. This shared parking demand was then tabulated by use and applied by zone which is further described below.



Zone Analysis and Future Demand Projections The Zone analysis summary shown as Exhibit 4 is comprised of two parts. Part A - Subjects the future projected land uses or redeveloped sites previously shown on Exhibit 3 to a

summary shared parking analysis. It identifies the total demand from these new sites during the peak hours of parking demand in the study area.

Part B - Applies this new demand to the existing demand during the same two peak hour periods and summarizes the new future demand. This is compared against current supply by zone, and in total, showing deficits and surpluses.

PART V. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate a potentially serious deficit during the afternoon. During the 1-2 PM time period Zone B has a deficit of 612 parking spaces and the study area has an overall deficit of 408 spaces. It should be noted that this analysis considered all spaces as available to the parker. However an industry standard known as effective supply accounts for some spaces being lost due to weather or the fact that parkers don’t want to circulate for longer time periods searching for a space. Consequently, any measures to remediate this deficit should consider this factor possibly requiring an additional 15% added supply. Preliminary site plans provided by the City of Elmhurst indicate that the first floor of the proposed parking deck will have 7 ADA spaces, with the remainder being retail space, and the ramping system to the floors above. Each floor above will have about 120 parking spaces. Thus, at least 5 floors of parking above the first floor would be needed to accommodate the calculated deficit of 612 spaces. And if the 15% effectiveness factor is included, the potential deficit increases to 704 spaces, which would require 6 floors of parking above the first floor. PART VI. TECHNICAL ADDENDUM The following Exhibits and Appendices were previously referenced. They provide technical support for our observations, findings, and recommendations discussed in the text.

Exhibits 1. Study Area 2. Existing Public Parking Occupancy 3. Redevelopment Sites 4. Zone Analysis Summary

Appendices

A1. Public Parking Usage Summary A2. Weekday Shared Parking Analysis of Redevelopment Sites

Part A. Weekday Shared Parking Analysis:

Considers all Redevelopment Sites

Time Zone A Zone B Zone C Zone D Total

6:00 AM 13 116 8 12 1497:00 AM 28 250 17 24 3198:00 AM 41 381 26 36 4849:00 AM 60 508 37 52 657

10:00 AM 78 626 49 68 82111:00 AM 79 683 49 69 88012:00 PM 84 749 52 73 9581:00 PM 88 746 54 75 963 *Peak of Sites & CBD

2:00 PM 77 645 48 67 837

3:00 PM 64 575 40 56 7354:00 PM 58 554 37 51 700

5:00 PM 68 615 43 60 7866:00 PM 68 607 43 60 7787:00 PM 66 585 41 58 750 **Represents evening

8:00 PM 63 561 39 55 718 conditions (commuters gone)

9:00 PM 49 453 31 43 57610:00 PM 40 370 25 35 470

11:00 PM 31 290 20 28 369

Part B. Parking Supply Adaquacy:

1. Weekday Peak Parking Period (1:00-2:00 pm)

Zone

Existing Peak Demand

Redevelopment Demand

Future Demand Supply Surplus/ Deficit

Zone A 98 88 186 216 30Zone B 478 746 1224 612 -612Zone C 405 54 459 617 158Zone D 497 75 572 588 16

Total 1478 963 2441 2033 -408

2. Weekday Evening Period (7:00-8:00 pm)

Zone

Existing Peak Demand

Redevelopment Demand

Future Demand Supply Surplus/ Deficit

Zone A 99 66 165 216 51Zone B 162 585 747 612 -135Zone C 268 41 309 617 308Zone D 241 58 299 588 289

Total 770 750 1520 2033 513Notes:

1. Zone B supply is a reduction of 40 parking spaces over existing to account for development of Lot P-7.

Exhibit 4

ZONE ANALYSIS SUMMARYCity of Elmhurst CBD Parking Study

Table A1Elmhurst CBDPUBLIC PARKING USAGE SUMMARY

2012/2013 Average CalcData provided by City of Elmhurst 9:30/10:30 AM 1:30/2:00 PM 5:00 PM 7:00/8:00 PM

NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. %LOT LOCATION LIMITS CAPACITY TYPE 2 BLOCK ZONE USED USED USED USED USED USED USED USED

North Sectors

P-1 NORTH SIDE OF HAHN WEST OF YORK 24 OFF 1 N 2 9% 3 12% 3 13% 2 8%

P-2 EAST SIDE OF YORK BETWEEN NORTH & HAHN 6 OFF 3 N 3 43% 4 59% 4 67% 2 33%

P-1 HAHN ST. LOT WEST OF YORK 25 OFF 3 N 2 6% 2 7% 5 20% 4 16%

P-1 NORTH SIDE OF HAHN** WEST OF YORK - 2 of 3 pkg lots 58 OFF 3 N 27 47% 29 50% 16 28% 16 28%

P-2 EAST SIDE OF YORK BETWEEN NORTH & HAHN 35 OFF 3 N 9 26% 9 26% 30 86% 8 23%

P-24 237 N. YORK ST. LOT SOUTH OF ANGELO'S RESTAURANT 21 OFF 3 N 6 27% 7 33% 6 29% 5 24%

HAHN (SOUTH SIDE) BETWEEN YORK & ADDISON 8 ON 2 N 2 25% 3 38% 1 13%

THIRD (NORTH SIDE) BETWEEN YORK & ADDISON 5 ON 2 N 4 80% 3 60% 7 140%

YORK (EAST SIDE) BETWEEN THIRD & HAHN 11 ON 3 N 4 36% 3 27% 5 45%

YORK (WEST SIDE) BETWEEN THIRD & HAHN 7 ON 2 N 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

ZONE N TOTAL 200 58 29% 62 31% N/A 50 25%

P-4 ALLEY NORTH OF PALMER PALMER TO CITY HALL 23 OFF 6 A 9 40% 10 43% 11 48% 2 9%

P-5 ELMHURST & MICHIGAN N.E. CORNER 42 OFF 6 A 10 25% 13 30% 8 19% 8 19%

P-3 N. YORK & SECOND ST.** NORTH EAST CORNER 49 OFF 6 A 6 13% 18 37% 15 31% 13 27%

THIRD (SOUTH SIDE) BETWEEN YORK & ADDISON 9 ON 5 A 5 56% 6 67% 9 100%

SECOND (NORTH SIDE) BETWEEN YORK & ADDISON 10 ON 5 A 8 80% 9 90% 10 100%

SECOND (NORTH SIDE) BETWEEN ADDISON & LARCH 2 ON 5 A 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%

ADDISON (EAST SIDE) BETWEEN SECOND & THIRD 29 ON 5 A 6 21% 8 28% 16 55%

ADDISON (WEST SIDE) BETWEEN SECOND & THIRD 16 ON 4 A 5 31% 9 56% 16 100%

YORK (EAST SIDE) BETWEEN SECOND & THIRD 15 ON 6 A 7 47% 10 67% 10 67%

YORK (WEST SIDE) BETWEEN SECOND & THIRD 21 ON 5 A 15 71% 15 71% 13 62%

ZONE A TOTAL 216 73 34% 98 46% 99 46%

Center Sectors

P-27 FIRST ST PARKING DECK FIRST & LARCH 70 OFF 7 B 61 87% 67 96% 30 43% 2 3%

P-28 EAST SIDE OF ADDISON BETWEEN FIRST & SECOND 18 OFF 9 B 8 44% 10 56% 15 83% 7 39%

P-6 LARCH ALLEY (L shaped lot) NORTH OF FIRST ST. 30 OFF 8 B 22 72% 20 68% 8 27% 6 20%

P-7 ADDISON AVE BETWEEN FIRST & SECOND 40 OFF 8 B 26 66% 26 65% 19 48% 0 0%

P-8 SCHILLER COURT BETWEEN YORK & ADDISON 23 OFF 9 B 13 56% 21 91% 24 104% 4 17%

P-14 SOUTH SIDE OF FIRST ADDISON TO MAPLE 72 OFF 7 B 71 99% 71 98% 11 15% 8 11%

P-27 FIRST ST PARKING DECK FIRST & LARCH 183 OFF 7 B 137 75% 152 83% 77 42% 9 5%

P-7 ADDISON AVE.** BETWEEN FIRST & SECOND 18 OFF 8 B 11 59% 8 46% 5 28% 3 17%

P-8 SCHILLER COURT** BETWEEN YORK & ADDISON 33 OFF 9 B 12 36% 19 58% 27 82% 21 64%

SECOND (SOUTH SIDE) BETWEEN YORK & ADDISON 19 ON 9 B 15 79% 16 84% 17 89%

ADDISON (EAST SIDE) BETWEEN FIRST & SECOND 37 ON 9 B 12 32% 22 59% 32 86%

ADDISON (WEST SIDE) BETWEEN FIRST & SECOND 13 ON 8 B 8 62% 6 46% 8 62%

YORK (WEST SIDE) BETWEEN SCHILLER & SECOND 8 ON 9 B 7 88% 7 88% 8 100%

YORK (WEST SIDE) BETWEEN FIRST & SCHILLER 14 ON 9 B 10 71% 11 79% 12 86%

FIRST (NORTH SIDE) BETWEEN ADDISON & YORK 21 ON 9 B 10 48% 14 67% 18 86%

FIRST (SOUTH SIDE) BETWEEN ADDISON & YORK 13 ON 9 B 7 54% 7 54% 7 54%

ZONE B TOTAL 612 429 70% 478 78% 162 26%

P-9 SCHILLER DECK SWC PALMER AND SCHILLER 132 OFF 12 C 109 83% 116 88% 79 60% 18 14%

BUSINESS RESERVED SPACES 26 OFF 12 C 6 24% 9 35% 5 19% 9 35%

P-9 SCHILLER DECK PARKING DECK 81 OFF 12 C 60 74% 66 81% 40 49% 11 14%

P-11 ALLEY NORTH OF FIRST WEST OF HAVEN 18 OFF 13 C 18 100% 17 96% 12 67% 2 11%

P-11 ALLEY NORTH OF FIRST WEST OF HAVEN 14 OFF 13 C 7 53% 7 50% 11 79% 5 36%

P-19 SOUTH SIDE OF FIRST WEST OF HAVEN 33 OFF 13 C 33 100% 33 100% 7 21% 6 18%

P-26 MICHIGAN & ELMHURST 34 OFF 11 C 15 44% 12 34% 7 21% 5 15%

P-9 SCHILLER DECK** SWC PALMER AND E. SCHILLER 72 OFF 12 C 19 26% 34 47% 34 47% 56 78%

P-10 POLICE STATION** NORTH OF FIRST 21 OFF 12 C 12 55% 13 63% 21 100% 16 76%

30 MINUTE SPOTS 5 OFF 12 C 1 29% 1 13% 2 40% 1 20%

A CITY CENTRE NWC PALMER AND SCHILLER 92 OFF 10 C 48 52% 39 42% 83 90% 75 82%

YORK (EAST SIDE) BETWEEN SCHILLER & SECOND 8 ON 10 C 6 75% 7 88% 7 88%

PEAK

Table A1Elmhurst CBDPUBLIC PARKING USAGE SUMMARY

YORK (EAST SIDE) BETWEEN FIRST & SCHILLER 16 ON 12 C 13 81% 14 88% 16 100%

SCHILLER (NORTH SIDE) BETWEEN YORK & PALMER 5 ON 10 C 4 80% 4 80% 5 100%

SCHILLER (SOUTH SIDE) BETWEEN YORK & PALMER 10 ON 12 C 8 80% 8 80% 8 80%

SCHILLER (NORTH SIDE) BETWEEN PALMER & HAVEN 8 ON 11 C 3 38% 4 50% 0 0%

SCHILLER (SOUTH SIDE) BETWEEN PALMER & HAVEN 8 ON 13 C 3 38% 3 38% 0 0%

FIRST (NORTH SIDE) BETWEEN YORK & PALMER 9 ON 12 C 5 56% 5 56% 10 111%

FIRST (SOUTH SIDE) BETWEEN YORK & PALMER 17 ON 12 C 8 47% 8 47% 16 94%

FIRST (SOUTH SIDE) BETWEEN PALMER & HAVEN (ADDITIONAL T 8 ON 13 C 5 63% 5 63% 2 25%

ZONE C TOTAL 617 383 62% 405 66% 268 43%

South Sector

P-17 NORTH SIDE PARK SOUTH OF METRA STATION 10 OFF 14 D 9 94% 9 89% 10 100% 4 40%

P-18 NORTH SIDE PARK YORK TO PALMER 7 OFF 15 D 4 56% 4 62% 7 100% 5 71%

P-20 NORTH & SOUTH SIDE PARK PALMER TO ARLINGTON 22 OFF 16 D 21 96% 21 96% 12 55% 2 9%

P-22 ADELL & ADELAIDE DECK PARKING DECK 191 OFF 17 D 183 96% 184 97% 134 70% 85 45%

P-25 WEST SIDE OF COTTAGE HILL BETWEEN PARK & ADELAIDE 8 OFF 14 D 2 31% 4 50% 4 50% 0 0%

P-22 ADELL & ADELAIDE DECK PARKING DECK - EMPLOYEE 48 OFF 17 D 42 88% 44 91% 31 65% 3 6%

P-15 NORTH SIDE OF PARK COTTAGE HILL TO PROSPECT 72 OFF 14 D 64 89% 71 98% 19 26% 7 10%

P-17 NORTH SIDE OF PARK SOUTH OF METRA STATION 21 OFF 14 D 20 95% 19 92% 15 71% 14 67%

NORTH SIDE OF PARK @ C.N.W.R.R. (MOTORCYCLE PKG) 8 OFF 14 D 0 4% 0 3% 1 13% 1 13%

P-22 ADELL & ADELAIDE PARKING DECK 60 OFF 17 D 60 100% 58 96% 37 62% 4 7%

P-22 ADELL & ADELAIDE PARKING DECK - FREE 12 OFF 17 D 6 50% 8 69% 12 100% 12 100%

B 5/3 BANK SOUTHEAST CORNER YORK & PARK 30 OFF 15 D 10 34% 14 47% 23 77% 28 93%

PARK (NORTH SIDE) BETWEEN PALMER & YORK 5 ON 15 D 5 100% 4 80% 5 100%

PARK (SOUTH SIDE) BETWEEN PALMER & YORK 4 ON 15 D 2 50% 2 50% 3 75%

PARK (NORTH SIDE) BETWEEN YORK & ADELL 12 ON 14 D 6 50% 8 67% 5 42%

PARK (SOUTH SIDE) BETWEEN YORK & ADELL 10 ON 14 D 6 60% 7 70% 9 90%

PARK (NORTH SIDE) BETWEEN ADELL & COTTAGE HILL 7 ON 14 D 4 57% 4 57% 2 29%

PARK (SOUTH SIDE) BETWEEN ADELL & COTTAGE HILL 5 ON 14 D 3 60% 2 40% 2 40%

ADELAIDE (NORTH SIDE) BETWEEN YORK & ADELL 8 ON 14 D 6 75% 4 50% 8 100%

ADELAIDE (NORTH SIDE) BETWEEN ADELL & COTTAGE HILL 7 ON 14 D 4 57% 5 71% 7 100%

ADELL (EAST SIDE) BETWEEN ADELAIDE & PARK 9 ON 14 D 9 100% 7 78% 9 100%

ADELL (WEST SIDE) BETWEEN ADELAIDE & PARK 4 ON 14 D 3 75% 2 50% 4 100%

YORK (EAST SIDE) SOUTH OF PARK 13 ON 15 D 6 46% 7 54% 10 77%

YORK (WEST SIDE) SOUTH OF PARK 15 ON 14 D 6 40% 8 53% 12 80%

ZONE D TOTAL 588 483 82% 497 85% 241 41%

ZONES A-D TOTAL 2033 1368 67% 1478 73% 770 38%

Table A2Elmhurst CBDWEEKDAY SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - REDEVELOPMENT SITES

Project Shared Parking RatiosUSE Visitor EmployeeCommunity Shopping 2.9 0.7 per 1,000 s.f.Restaurant or Bar 9 1.5 per 1,000 s.f.Medical Office 3 1.5 per 1,000 s.f.Office 0.3 3.5 per 1,000 s.f.Entertainment/Fine Dini 15.25 2.75 per 1,000 s.f.

Time Visitor Employee Visitor Employee Visitor Employee Visitor Employee Visitor Employee Visitor Employee Visitor Employee Visitor Employee Visitor Employee Visitor Employee Visitor EmployeeVisitor 85%

Employee 95%

6:00 AM 27 9 0 1 0 1 34 11 0 2 1 1 0 0 43 14 1 2 1 1 0 1 67 317:00 AM 54 14 2 1 0 13 68 17 0 16 3 2 0 3 86 21 5 3 3 2 1 9 138 738:00 AM 65 16 5 3 1 32 81 20 1 39 8 5 0 8 103 26 14 9 9 6 12 23 180 1359:00 AM 81 16 10 6 2 40 101 20 3 50 15 9 0 12 128 26 28 17 17 11 36 29 245 171

10:00 AM 92 18 19 7 4 42 115 23 5 53 28 10 14 15 145 29 51 19 32 12 60 30 323 18711:00 AM 97 18 26 8 2 42 122 23 2 53 38 12 37 15 154 29 70 21 44 13 27 30 382 19112:00 PM 108 18 31 8 1 38 135 23 1 47 46 12 69 15 171 29 84 22 52 14 9 27 456 1841:00 PM 97 18 35 8 2 38 122 23 2 47 51 12 69 15 154 29 93 22 58 14 27 27 447 1842:00 PM 54 18 35 8 4 42 68 23 5 53 51 12 59 15 86 29 93 22 58 14 60 30 339 1933:00 PM 49 14 35 8 2 42 61 17 2 53 51 12 37 12 77 21 93 22 58 14 27 30 303 1794:00 PM 49 14 33 8 1 38 61 17 1 47 48 12 46 12 77 21 88 22 55 14 9 27 301 1705:00 PM 81 17 30 8 0 21 101 21 0 26 43 12 69 17 128 27 79 21 49 13 6 15 383 1456:00 PM 86 17 28 8 0 11 108 21 0 13 41 12 87 17 137 27 74 21 46 13 3 8 404 1237:00 PM 86 17 26 8 0 4 108 21 0 5 38 12 92 17 137 27 70 21 44 13 1 3 400 1108:00 PM 86 17 23 8 0 3 108 21 0 4 33 11 92 17 137 27 60 20 38 13 1 2 384 1059:00 PM 65 14 17 6 0 1 81 18 0 2 25 9 92 17 103 23 46 17 29 11 0 1 310 88

10:00 PM 59 12 10 3 0 0 74 15 0 1 15 5 87 17 94 19 28 9 17 6 0 0 262 6411:00 PM 54 12 3 1 0 0 68 15 0 0 5 2 69 17 86 19 9 3 6 2 0 0 204 53

Site #1Restaurant 12,000 s.f. Visitor Spaces: 108

Employee Spaces: 18Site #2Retail 12,000 s.f. Visitor Spaces: 35

Employee Spaces: 8Office 12,000 s.f. Visitor Spaces: 4

Employee Spaces: 42

Site #3Restaurant 15,000 s.f. Visitor Spaces: 135

Employee Spaces: 23Office 15,000 s.f. Visitor Spaces: 5

Employee Spaces: 53

Site #4Garage/Retail 17,500 s.f. Visitor Spaces: 51

Employee Spaces: 12Site #6Restaurant 19,000 s.f. Visitor Spaces: 171

Employee Spaces: 29Site #7Retail 32,000 s.f. Visitor: 93

Reserved: 22Site #8Retail 20,000 s.f. Visitor: 58

Reserved: 14Medical Office 20,000 s.f. Visitor: 60

Reserved: 30Site #5Entertainment/Dining 6,000 s.f. Visitor: 92

Reserved: 17Total: 1077

Site #2Office

Site #3Office

Site #8Medical OfficeSite #4 -Retail RetailSite #5 - Entertainment

Unshared Demand

Site #1 - Restaurant Retail Restaurant Site #6 - Restaurant Site #7

Table A2Elmhurst CBDWEEKDAY SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS - REDEVELOPMENT SITES

Visitor 40%Employee

70%Zone B SUM RAW

Zone A Sum

Zone C Sum

Zone D Sum

11 8 116 150 13 8 1223 17 250 320 28 17 2434 31 381 484 41 26 3654 39 508 658 60 37 5273 42 626 821 78 49 6867 43 683 880 79 49 6968 41 749 959 84 52 7373 41 746 961 86 54 7569 43 645 836 77 48 6753 40 575 736 64 40 5645 38 554 700 58 37 5155 32 615 785 68 43 6054 27 607 778 68 43 6052 23 585 750 66 41 5850 22 561 719 63 39 5538 18 453 576 49 31 4331 12 370 471 40 25 3524 10 290 369 31 20 28

Shared Parking Totals

4794.900 elmhurst cbd parking study 10-4-13

Documents