4.ideal reactors

49
1 CONTINUOUS IDEAL REACTORS A. SARATH BABU

Upload: surya-tej

Post on 08-Apr-2015

1.578 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 4.Ideal Reactors

1

CONTINUOUS IDEAL REACTORS

A. SARATH BABU

Page 2: 4.Ideal Reactors

2

Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor

Page 3: 4.Ideal Reactors

CSTR Contd. . . 3

Page 4: 4.Ideal Reactors

CSTR Animation 4

Page 5: 4.Ideal Reactors

CSTR Contd. . . 5

• Also called as Mixed, Backmix, Ideal stirred tank reactor

• Open system, operates under steady state conditions

• Reactants are continuously introduced and products are

continuously withdrawn

• Perfect mixing – contents have uniform properties

– No spatial variations

• Conditions at the exit are same as inside the reactor

• Used for homogenous liquid phase reactions where

constant agitation is required

• Eg. Sulfonation, Polymerization, plastics, explosives,

synthetic rubber etc.

Page 6: 4.Ideal Reactors

CSTR Contd. . . 6

Advantages:

• Cheap to construct

• Good temperature control

• Reactor has large heat capacity

• Easy access to interiors

Disadvantages:

• Conversion per unit volume of the reactor is

smallest compared to other flow reactors

Page 7: 4.Ideal Reactors

7

Fractional Conversion (xA):

0

0

A

AAA F

FFx

0

0

A

AAA C

CCx

Space time ():

Space time is the time required to process one reactor volume of inlet material (feed) measured at inlet conditions. is the time required for a volume of feed equal to the volume of the vessel (V) to flow through the vessel.

= V/v0 = sec N.B. : Volume of vessel here means volume of Reaction Mixture.

(for constant density)

Page 8: 4.Ideal Reactors

8

Space Velocity (S): Space velocity (S) is the reciprocal of space time, the number of reactor volumes of feed, measured at inlet conditions, processed per unit time.Mean Residence time tm:

The residence time is the length of time species spend in the reactor. All molecules that enter may not spend the same time in the reactor.

The distribution of residence times – RTD

The average length of time that molecules spend in the reactor – mean residence time (tm)

tm = V/vE

Page 9: 4.Ideal Reactors

9

)1(0 AAA xFF

000 / AA CFv lit

molmollit

secsec

For constant density:

)1()1(

00

0AA

AAAA xC

v

xF

v

FC

For variable density:

)1(

)1(

)1(

)1(0

0

0

AA

AA

AA

AAAA x

xC

xv

xF

v

FC

Page 10: 4.Ideal Reactors

10

Stoichiometric Table – Flow Systems

B FB0 -(b/a)FA0xA FB= FA0(MB-(b/a)xA)

R FR0 +(r/a)FA0xA FR= FA0(MR+(r/a)xA)

S FS0 +(s/a)FA0xA FS= FA0(MS+(s/a)xA)

I FI0 0 FI = FI0

Total FT0 FT = FT0 + NA0δxA

Where: MI = FI0/FA0

δ = (r/a + s/a – b/a – 1)

aA + bB rR + sS

For Constant density: CA = CA0(1-xA)

Species Initial Change Final moles A FA0 -FA0xA FA= FA0(1-xA)

Page 11: 4.Ideal Reactors

11

Page 12: 4.Ideal Reactors

12

Design Equation

General Mass Balance Equation:

Rate of Input = rate of output + accumulation + rate of disappearance

FA0 = FA + 0 + (-rA) V

FA0 - FA = (-rA) V

FA0 xA = (-rA) V

V / FAo = xA / -rA

FA0

CA0

v0

FA

CA

VxA

Page 13: 4.Ideal Reactors

13

V / FAo = xA / -rA

General Design eqn. for a CSTR:

V / (v0 CA0) = xA / -rA

/ CA0 = xA / -rA

Design eqn. for a CSTR under constant density:

= (CA0 – CA) / -rAtm = V/vE

Note that the space time and the mean residence time are equal only in the case of constant density.

Page 14: 4.Ideal Reactors

14

DA =kCA0n-1

Comparison of Different orderReactions in a CSTR

Page 15: 4.Ideal Reactors

15

Plug Flow Reactor

Page 16: 4.Ideal Reactors

PFR Animation 16

The necessary and sufficient condition for plug flow is the residence time in the reactor to be the same for all elements of the fluid.

Page 17: 4.Ideal Reactors

17

• PFR is also called as tubular reactor

• Residence time is same for all fluid elements

• Operated under steady state conditions

• Reactants are consumed as they flow down along the

length of the reactor

• Axial concentration gradients exist

• One long tube or a number of short tubes (see fig.)

• Choice of diameter depends on fabrication cost,

pumping cost and heat transfer needs

• Wide variety of applications in gas/liquid phase

• Eg.: Production of gasoline, cracking, synthesis of

ammonia, SO2 oxidation

Page 18: 4.Ideal Reactors

18

Page 19: 4.Ideal Reactors

19

(1) The flow in the vessel is Plug flow.

(2)There is no axial mixing of fluid inside the vessel (i.e., in the direction of flow).

(3)There is complete radial mixing of fluid inside the vessel (i.e., in the plane perpendicular to the direction of flow).

(4)Properties may change continuously in the direction of flow

(5)In the axial direction, each portion of fluid, acts as a closed system in motion, not exchanging material with the portion ahead of it or behind it.

Page 20: 4.Ideal Reactors

PFR Contd. . . 20

Advantages:

• Easily maintained as there are no moving parts

• High conversion per unit volume

• Unvarying product quality

• Good for studying rapid reactions

Disadvantages:

• Poor temperature control

• Hot spots may occur when used for exothermic

reactions

Page 21: 4.Ideal Reactors

21

Page 22: 4.Ideal Reactors

22

Page 23: 4.Ideal Reactors

23

Page 24: 4.Ideal Reactors

24

Design Equation General Mass Balance Equation:

Rate of Input = rate of output + accumulation + rate of disappearance

FA = FA + dFA + 0 + (-rA) dV

-dFA = (-rA) dV

FA0 dxA = (-rA) dV

Page 25: 4.Ideal Reactors

25

Page 26: 4.Ideal Reactors

26

Ax

AAA rdxFV0

0 //

General Design eqn. for a PFR:

Ax

AAA rdxC0

0 //

Design eqn. for a PFR (under constant density):

Ax

AA rdC0

/ V

m vdVt0

/

Note that the space time and the mean residence time are equal only in the case of constant density.

Page 27: 4.Ideal Reactors

27

CA/CA0

DA = kCA0n-1

Comparison of Different orderReactions in a PFR

Page 28: 4.Ideal Reactors

28

Item BR CSTR PFR

XA (NA0-NA)/NA0 (FA0-FA)/FA0

CA NA/V FA/v

-rA (NA0/V)dxA/dt FA0xA/V FA0dxA/dV

t NA0dxA/V(-rA) = V/v0

Constant density

XA (CA0-CA)/CA0 (CA0-CA)/CA0

-rA -dCA/dt (CA0 -CA)/ -dCA/d

t -dCA/(-rA) = V/v0

Page 29: 4.Ideal Reactors

29

Algorithm for Isothermal Reactor Design

Page 30: 4.Ideal Reactors

30

Page 31: 4.Ideal Reactors

31

CSTR PFR

/ CA0 = xA / -rA Ax

AAA rdxC0

0 //

1 /-rA

xA

/ CA0

/ CA0

Page 32: 4.Ideal Reactors

32

CSTR PFR

V / FA0 = xA / -rA Ax

AAA rdxFV0

0 //

Page 33: 4.Ideal Reactors

33

CSTR PFR

1 /-rA

= (CA0 – CA) / -rA Ax

AA rdC0

/

CA CA0

1 /-rA

CA CA0

(Constant Density)

Page 34: 4.Ideal Reactors

34

CSTR PFR

1 /-rA

CA CA0

1 /-rA

CA CA0

(Constant Density)

CVBR

1 /-rA

t

CA CA0

Page 35: 4.Ideal Reactors

35

CSTR PFR

VVBR1 /-rA

xA

/ CA0

1 /-rA

xA

/ CA0

xA

t / CA0

)1(

1

AAA xr

Page 36: 4.Ideal Reactors

36

CSTR PFR

= (CA0 – CA) / -rA A

A

C

C

AA rdC0

/(Constant Density)

Zero Order

= (CA0 – CA) / k A

A

C

C

A kdC0

/

k = CA0 – CA k = CA0 – CA

Constant Density BR

kt = CA0 – CA

k = CA0 xA k = CA0 xA

Page 37: 4.Ideal Reactors

37

CSTR PFR

= (CA0 – CA) / -rA A

A

C

C

AA rdC0

/(Constant Density)

First Order

= (CA0 – CA) / kCA A

C

C

A CkdCA

A

0

/

k = (CA0 – CA)/CA

Constant Density BR

kxC

CA

A

A )1ln(ln0

ktC

C

A

A 0

ln

k = xA /(1-xA)

Page 38: 4.Ideal Reactors

38

CSTR PFR

= (CA0 – CA) / -rA A

A

C

C

AA rdC0

/(Constant Density)

Second Order

= (CA0 – CA) / kCA2

2

0

/ A

C

C

A CkdCA

A

k = (CA0 – CA)/CA2

Constant Density BR

kCC AA

0

11

ktCC AA

0

11

k CA0 = xA /(1-xA)2

Page 39: 4.Ideal Reactors

39

Constant Density

Page 40: 4.Ideal Reactors

40

For constant density:• The performance of the Batch reactor is

similar to that of PFR for all orders•The performance of all the three reactors is the same in case of zero order reaction•The performance of PFR is superior to that of a CSTR for all orders > 0

For all reaction orders > 0• The volume of a CSTR required for obtaining a given conversion is larger than that of PFR• For the same volumes of PFR & CSTR, the conversion obtained is larger in the case of PFR

Page 41: 4.Ideal Reactors

41

CSTR PFR

= CA0xA / -rA Ax

AAA rdxC0

0 /(Variable Density)

Zero Order

= CA0 xA / k Ax

AA kdxC0

0 /

k = CA0 xA k = CA0xA

Variable Density BR:

tkxC AAAA )1ln(0

AA

A

A

A

x

x

C

C

1

1

0

Page 42: 4.Ideal Reactors

42

CSTR PFR

= CA0xA / -rA Ax

AAA rdxC0

0 /

(Variable Density)

First Order

= CA0 xA / kCA A

x

AA CkdxCA

0

0 /

k = CA0 xA/CA

Variable Density BR:

AAAA xxk )1ln()1(

ktxA )1ln(

AA

A

A

A

x

x

C

C

1

1

0

Page 43: 4.Ideal Reactors

43

CSTR PFR

= CA0xA / -rA Ax

AAA rdxC0

0 /(Variable Density)

Second Order

= CA0 xA / kCA2

2

0

0 / A

x

AA CkdxCA

Variable Density BR:

)1ln()1(20 AAAA xkC

)1/()1( 22AAAAA xxx

tkCxxx AAAAAA 0)1ln()1/()1(

AA

A

A

A

x

x

C

C

1

1

0

k = CA0 xA / CA2

Page 44: 4.Ideal Reactors

44

Variable Density

Page 45: 4.Ideal Reactors

45

Relative performance of plug flow and continuous-flow stirred tank

reactors

Fraction unreacted is larger in CSTR for a given Da

Page 46: 4.Ideal Reactors

46

Comparison of reactor volume required for a given conversion for a first-order reaction in a PFR and a CSTR

• For small conversions VCSTR/VPFR = 1 (selection of reactor not very critical).

• For large conversions, VCSTR/VPFR is very large (selection of reactor very critical).

Page 47: 4.Ideal Reactors

47

For Variable density:

•The performance of CSTR & PFR is similar in case of zero order (irrespective of constant / variable density)

•The performance of BR is different from the performance of PFR (the performance was similar in the case of constant density)

•The performance of PFR is superior to that of a CSTR for all orders > 0 (same as constant density)

Page 48: 4.Ideal Reactors

48

Criteria Batch CSTR PFR

Reactor size for given conversion + - +

Simplicity and Cost + + -

Continuous operation - + +

Large throughput - + +

Cleanout + + -

On-line analysis - + +

Product quality - + +

Comparison of possible advantages (+) and Disadvantages (-)for Batch, CSTR and PFR Reactors

Page 49: 4.Ideal Reactors

49

ANY CLARIFICATIONS ?

Abbey, EdwardThat which today calls itself science gives us more and more information,

an indigestible glut of information, and less and less understanding.