4_igarss11_younis_nogifv4.pptx
TRANSCRIPT
M. Younis
Design Optimization Aspects for Reflector Base Synthetic Aperture Radar
Marwan Younis, Anton Patyuchenko, Sigurd Huber, and Gerhard Krieger,
Microwaves and Radar Institute, German Aerospace Center (DLR)
International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium July 24-29, 2011 – Vancouver, Canada
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 2
SAR Instrument Requirements
Parameter Value frequency 9.65 GHz (X-Band)
coverage > 300 km
resolution ≤ 1 x 1 m
ambiguity-to-signal ratio ≤ -20 dB
noise-equivalent sigma zero ≤ -20 dB
System and Requirement ParametersSystem and Requirement Parameters
• Reflector based SAR Systemarchitecture and operation
• System Performancerange- & azimuth-ambiguity-to-signal ratio, noise-
equivalent sigma zero, pulse extension loss
• Performance Optimizationbeamforming in elevation and azimuth
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 3
Operation of Transmit in ElevationOperation of Transmit in Elevation
swath
Tx illumination
ground range
reflectorflight
direction
slant range
• transmit with all feed elements
• narrow beam of feed array
• illuminate small portion of reflector wide and low gain beam
illuminating complete swath
Transmit in Elevation
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 4
reflector
swathground range
Rx window
Operation of Receive in ElevationOperation of Receive in Elevation
flight direction
slant range
SCan-On-REceive (SCORE)
• follow the pulse echo on the ground by activating corresponding elements
• cycle through all elements within on PRI
Rx element activation matrix
• energy from a small portion of the ground illuminates complete reflector
• focused on individual elements of feed narrow and high gain beam
Receive in Elevation
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 5
Azimuth OperationAzimuth Operation
flight
dire
ctio
n
Transmit in Azimuth
• transmit with all feed elements
• narrow beam of feed array
• illuminate small portion of reflector wide and low gain beam
swath width
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 6
Azimuth OperationAzimuth Operation
flight
dire
ctio
n
Doppler span 4
beam 3
beam 1 Doppl
er span 1
Doppler span 2
Doppler span 3
beam 2
beam 4
Receive in Azimuth
• each azimuth channel is sampled
• each azimuth channel covers a narrow Doppler spectrum
low PRF
• combining the azimuth channels yields a wide Doppler bandwidth high resolution
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 7
single azimuth channel T/R-Module
Nel
1
2
ADC
ADC
ADC
feed elements
AMP
AMP
AMP
Dig
ital
Bea
mfo
rmin
g
Hardware Functional Block DiagramHardware Functional Block Diagram
flight direction
slant range
mem
ory
signal gen.
reflector
• digital feed array in elevation directionSCan-On-REceive (SCORE)
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 8
Hardware Functional Block DiagramHardware Functional Block Diagram
reflector
flight direction
slant range
mem
ory
signal gen.
Nel
1
2
ADC
ADC
ADC
feed elements
AMP
AMP
AMP
Dig
ital
Bea
mfo
rmin
g
T/R-Modulesingle azimuth channel
single azimuth channel
single azimuth channel
• digital feed array in elevation directionSCan-On-REceive (SCORE)
• digital feed array in azimuth direction good azimuth resolution
2D Digital Feed Array
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 9
• deployable reflector are mature technology
• flight heritage in space telecommunications satellites
• Lightweight mesh reflectors spanning diameters > 20 m exist
Deployable Reflector AntennasDeployable Reflector Antennas
X-Band Reflector System X-Band Reflector System
Parameter Value
reflector
diameter (elevation x
azimuth)12 x 12 m
focal length 12 m
elevation offset 0.5 m
feed
patches & TRMs 114 x 10
digital feeds 38 x 5
approx. size 3.5 x 0.3 m
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 10
• image any single swath within access range
• conventional stripmap processing
swath 1
swath 2
swath 3
swath 4
Operation Mode and TimingOperation Mode and Timing
95 k
m
82 k
m
70 k
m
75 k
m
access range 315 km
orbit height 745 km
receive window
Tx Tx
time
PRI = 1/PRF
PRI·dc PRI pulse repetition intervalPRF pulse repetition frequencydc duty cyclessw sub-swath
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 11
Range-Ambiguity-to-Signal RatioRange-Ambiguity-to-Signal Ratio
range-ambiguity-to-signal ratio
signal
ambig
Tx
Rx
elevation patterns
2-way
good range ambiguity suppression due to
narrow Rx pattern
increase of PRF is possible
But: timing issues limit the swath width
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 12
Azimuth-Ambiguity-to-Signal RatioAzimuth-Ambiguity-to-Signal Ratio
azimuth-ambiguity-to-signal ratio
• AASR shows degradation at swath edges
due to degraded azimuth patterns
• improvement through: higher PRF, antenna
optimization, azimuth beamforming, or
waveform encoding
proc. Doppler 595x10 Hz
oversampling 3.8
azimuth resolution 10.3/10 m
signalambig
Tx Rx
azimuth patterns
2-way
near range
mid rangeNESZ does not meet requirement
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 13
Noise-Equivalent Sigma Zero (NESZ)Noise-Equivalent Sigma Zero (NESZ)
Noise-Equivalent Sigma-Zero
• lower average power per swath than planar antenna systems
• a sub-set of the TRMs are activated for each swath
• the number of TRMs determine the total power
• reducing the swath width does not improve the NESZ
Pav = 900 W
720 W
600 W
540 W
2-way loss 2 dB
sys. noise temp. 450 K
duty cycle 10%
Av. power per TRM 2 W
NESZ performance does not meet requirement
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 14
3 Rx elements active
pulse extension on ground
s
na
dir
receive beam
reflecto
r
pattern steering
pulse
Pulse Extension Loss (PEL)Pulse Extension Loss (PEL)
The pulse extension loss (PEL) is the integral effect over multiple points simultaneously illuminated by the pulse.
pulse extension loss
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 15
Pulse Extension Loss (PEL)Pulse Extension Loss (PEL)
near range3
Rx
activ
e el
emen
ts4
Rx
activ
e el
emen
tsfar range
wide beam:low PEL but low gain
PEL not critical at far range
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 16
SCORE beam 1
S
feed 1 ADC
ADC
ADC
ADC
OnOff
OnOff
OnOff
OnOff
feed 2
feed 3
feed 4
reflector
swath 1
On/Off Beamforming in ElevationOn/Off Beamforming in Elevation
On/Off : switch element On or Off
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 17
SCORE beam 1
SCORE beam 2
S
S
feed 1 ADC
ADC
ADC
ADC
ADC
ADC
ADC
OnOff
OnOff
OnOff
OnOff
OnOff
OnOff
OnOff
feed 2
feed 3
feed 4
feed 5
feed 6
feed 7
reflector
swath 1
swath 2
Two-Swath On/Off BeamformingTwo-Swath On/Off Beamforming
On/Off : switch element On or Off
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 18
SCORE beam 1
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
SCORE beam 2
S
S
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
ADC
ADC
ADC
ADC
ADC
ADC
ADC
reflector
feed 1
feed 2
feed 3
feed 4
feed 5
feed 6
feed 7
Time Varying BeamformingTime Varying Beamforming
i : range sample (discrete time)
: complex time-varying weightw i
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 19
SCORE beam 1
w4w3w2w1
w4w3w2w1
w4w3w2w1
w4w3w2w1
w4w3w2w1
w4w3w2w1
w4w3w2w1
SCORE beam 2 S
S
S
S
S
S
S
i+3i i+2i+1
i+3i i+2i+1
i+3i i+2i+1
i+3i i+2i+1
i+3i i+2i+1
i+3i i+2i+1
i+3i i+2i+1
reflector
swath 1
ADC
ADC
ADC
ADC
ADC
ADC
ADC
feed 1
feed 2
feed 3
feed 4
feed 5
feed 6
feed 7
FIR Filter BeamformingFIR Filter Beamforming
i : range sample (discrete time)
: complex time-varying weightw i
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 20
elevation angle in degree
patte
rn g
ain
[dB
]
Noise-Equivalent Sigma-Zeroelevation beamforming gain
ground range in km
NE
SZ
[dB
]• Use elevation beamforming to increase antenna gain
• Most effective at large scan angel, where beams overlap (defocus)
• In best case increase the gain (NESZ) by 3dB to 5dB
3 dB3 dB
5 dB
3 dB
5 dB3 dB
3 dB
Elevation Beamforming to Increase Antenna GainElevation Beamforming to Increase Antenna Gain
MVDR: Minimum Variance Distortionless Response
LCMV: Linear Constraint Minimum Variance
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 21
• The reflector is only partially illuminated in elevation
• The illumination is a function of pulse duty cycle
reflector height reduction
• Although all azimuth elements are active on receive no sub-illumination occurs.
X-Band Reflector System X-Band Reflector System
diameter 6 x 12 m
focal length 12 m
elevation offset 0.5 m
center elements
edge elements
Reflector Illumination 6 x 2 Active Patches
Reflector Illumination EfficiencyReflector Illumination Efficiency
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 22
Noise-Equivalent Sigma-ZeroAzimuth Beamforming Gain
ground range in km
NE
SZ
[dB
]
SN
R g
ain
[dB
]
PRF [kHz]
far range
0.8 dB.8 dB
2.2 dB
.8 dB
near range
• Due to wide azimuth beams, several elements share common Doppler spectra.
• Combine azimuth channels to increase signal engery
• Increase the gain (NESZ) by .8dB to 2.2dB
PRF range
Azimuth Beamforming for SNR ImprovementAzimuth Beamforming for SNR Improvement
LCMV: Linear Constraint Minimum Variance
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 23
AASR without Beamforming
ground range in km
far range
near range
PRF range
PRF [kHz]
AA
SR
[dB
]
AA
SR
[dB
]
AASR with LCMV Beamforming
-28 dB-40 dB
-28 dB-28 dB
• The LCMV algorithm uses overlapping beams to place nulls at the ambiguity positions
• However the azimuth channels are sampled adequatly, i.e. no reconstruction needed.
• Azimuth-ambiguity suppression better than -38dB
Azimuth Beamforming for AASR ImprovementAzimuth Beamforming for AASR Improvement
Microwaves and Radar InstituteM. Younis – IGARSS’11 – [email protected]
Viewgraph 24
Reflector based systems allow for high-resolution wide-swath operation using digital beamforming
• High performance reflector SAR is feasible at X-band.
• The power consumption per swath is less than for planar
systems.
• Time varying digital beamforming is required in elevation
to reach full antenna gain.
• On-Ground digital beamforming is required in azimuth to
suppress ambiguities .
ConclusionConclusion