#5 - no of blade

Wind turbine designFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wind turbine design is the process of defining theform and specifications of a wind turbine to extractenergy from the wind.[1] A wind turbine installationconsists of the necessary systems needed to capturethe wind's energy, point the turbine into the wind,convert mechanical rotation into electrical power,and other systems to start, stop, and control theturbine.

This article covers the design of horizontal axis windturbines (HAWT) since the majority of commercialturbines use this design. Contrary to popular belief,considerable attention should be given to thestructural and foundation design of HAWTs. This ismainly due to the disproportionate amount that isspent on the foundations as a percentage of the total project cost.

An example of a wind turbine, this 3 bladed turbineis the classic design of modern wind turbines

Wind turbines

History

Design

Manufacturers

Unconventional

Contents

1 Design specification 1.1 Low temperature

2 Aerodynamics 3 Power control

3.1 Stall 3.2 Pitch control

4 Other controls 4.1 Yawing 4.2 Electrical braking 4.3 Mechanical braking

5 Turbine size 6 Generator

6.1 Gearless wind turbine 7 Blades

7.1 Blade design 7.2 The hub 7.3 Blade count 7.4 Blade materials

8 Tower 8.1 Tower height

9 Connection to the electric grid 10 Foundations 11 Costs 12 See also 13 References 14 External links

of 13Wind turbine design - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2/4/2012http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_turbine_design

Design specification

The design specification for a wind-turbine willcontain a power curve and guaranteed availability.With the data from the wind resource assessment itis possible to calculate commercial viability.[1] Thetypical operating temperature range is -20 to 40 °C(-4 to 104 °F). In areas with extreme climate (likeInner Mongolia or Rajasthan) specific cold and hotweather versions are required.

Wind turbines can be designed and validatedaccording to IEC 61400 standards.[2]

Low temperature

Utility-scale wind turbine generators have minimumtemperature operating limits which apply in areasthat experience temperatures below –20 °C. Windturbines must be protected from ice accumulation. Itcan make anemometer readings inaccurate andwhich can cause high structure loads and damage.Some turbine manufacturers offer low-temperaturepackages at a few percent extra cost, which includeinternal heaters, different lubricants, and differentalloys for structural elements. If the low-temperatureinterval is combined with a low-wind condition, thewind turbine will require an external supply ofpower, equivalent to a few percent of its ratedpower, for internal heating. For example, the St.Leon, Manitoba project has a total rating of 99 MWand is estimated to need up to 3 MW (around 3% ofcapacity) of station service power a few days a year for temperatures down to –30 °C. This factor affectsthe economics of wind turbine operation in cold climates.

Aerodynamics

Main article: Wind turbine aerodynamics

The aerodynamics of a horizontal-axis wind turbine are not straightforward. The air flow at the blades isnot the same as the airflow far away from the turbine. The very nature of the way in which energy isextracted from the air also causes air to be deflected by the turbine. In addition the aerodynamics of awind turbine at the rotor surface exhibit phenomena that are rarely seen in other aerodynamic fields.

In 1919 the physicist Albert Betz showed that for a hypothetical ideal wind-energy extraction machine,the fundamental laws of conservation of mass and energy allowed no more than 16/27 (59.3%) of thekinetic energy of the wind to be captured. This Betz' law limit can be approached by modern turbinedesigns which may reach 70 to 80% of this theoretical limit.

Wind turbine components : 1-Foundation, 2-Connection to the electric grid, 3-Tower, 4-Accessladder, 5-Wind orientation control (Yaw control), 6-Nacelle, 7-Generator, 8-Anemometer, 9-Electric orMachanical Brake, 10-Gearbox, 11-Rotor blade, 12-Blade pitch control, 13-Rotor hub.



Power control

A wind turbine is designed to produce a maximum of power at wide spectrum of wind speeds. All windturbines are designed for a maximum wind speed, called the survival speed, above which they do notsurvive. The survival speed of commercial wind turbines is in the range of 40 m/s (144 km/h, 89 MPH)to 72 m/s (259 km/h, 161 MPH). The most common survival speed is 60 m/s (216 km/h, 134 MPH). Thewind turbines have three modes of operation:

Below rated wind speed operation Around rated wind speed operation (usually at nameplate

capacity) Above rated wind speed operation

If the rated wind speed is exceeded the power has to be limited.There are various ways to achieve this.

A control system involves three basic elements: sensors tomeasure process variables, actuators to manipulate energycapture and component loading, and control algorithms tocoordinate the actuators based on information gathered by thesensors.[3]

Stall

Stalling works by increasing the angle at which the relative windstrikes the blades (angle of attack), and it reduces the induceddrag (drag associated with lift). Stalling is simple because it canbe made to happen passively (it increases automatically when thewinds speed up), but it increases the cross-section of the bladeface-on to the wind, and thus the ordinary drag. A fully stalledturbine blade, when stopped, has the flat side of the blade facingdirectly into the wind.

A fixed-speed HAWT inherently increases its angle of attack athigher wind speed as the blades speed up. A natural strategy,then, is to allow the blade to stall when the wind speed increases.This technique was successfully used on many early HAWTs.However, on some of these blade sets, it was observed that thedegree of blade pitch tended to increase audible noise levels.

Vortex generators may be used to control the lift characteristicsof the blade. The VGs are placed on the airfoil to enhance the liftif they are placed on the lower (flatter) surface or limit themaximum lift if placed on the upper (higher camber) surface.[4]

Pitch control

Furling works by decreasing the angle of attack, which reducesthe induced drag from the lift of the rotor, as well as the cross-section. One major problem in designing wind turbines is getting the blades to stall or furl quickly

Plastic vortex generator stripes usedto control stall characteristics of theblade - in this example protecting theblade from rapid fluctuations in windspeed.

Standard Kinematic's SE slewingdrive. Kinematic Slewing Drive canhandle over 300kNm of torque.

Closeup look at the vortex generators(VGs) - the larger ones are closest to



enough should a gust of wind cause sudden acceleration. A fullyfurled turbine blade, when stopped, has the edge of the bladefacing into the wind.

Loads can be reduced by making a structural system softer ormore flexible.[3] This could be accomplished with downwindrotors or with curved blades that twist naturally to reduce angle of attack at higher wind speeds. Thesesystems will be nonlinear and will couple the structure to the flow field - thus, design tools must evolveto model these nonlinearities.

Standard modern turbines all pitch the blades in high winds. Since pitching requires acting against thetorque on the blade, it requires some form of pitch angle control, which is achieved with a slewing drive.This drive precisely angles the blade while withstanding high torque loads. In addition, many turbinesuse hydraulic systems. These systems are usually spring-loaded, so that if hydraulic power fails, theblades automatically furl. Other turbines use an electric servomotor for every rotor blade. They have asmall battery-reserve in case of an electric-grid breakdown. Small wind turbines (under 50 kW) withvariable-pitching generally use systems operated by centrifugal force, either by flyweights or geometricdesign, and employ no electric or hydraulic controls.

Fundamental gaps exist in pitch control, limiting the reduction of energy costs, according to a reportfrom a coalition of researchers from universities, industry, and government, supported by the AtkinsonCenter for a Sustainable Future. Load reduction is currently focused on full-span blade pitch control,since individual pitch motors are the actuators currently available on commercial turbines. Significantload mitigation has been demonstrated in simulations for blades, tower, and drive train. However, thereis still research needed, the methods for realization of full-span blade pitch control need to be developedin order to increase energy capture and mitigate fatigue loads.[3]

Other controls

Yawing

Modern large wind turbines are typically actively controlled to face the wind direction measured by awind vane situated on the back of the nacelle. By minimizing the yaw angle (the misalignment betweenwind and turbine pointing direction), the power output is maximized and non-symmetrical loadsminimized. However, since the wind direction varies quickly the turbine will not strictly follow thedirection and will have a small yaw angle on average. The power output losses can simply beapproximated to fall with cos3(yaw angle).

Electrical braking

Braking of a small wind turbine can also be done by dumpingenergy from the generator into a resistor bank, converting thekinetic energy of the turbine rotation into heat. This method is useful if the kinetic load on the generatoris suddenly reduced or is too small to keep the turbine speed within its allowed limit.

Cyclically braking causes the blades to slow down, which increases the stalling effect, reducing theefficiency of the blades. This way, the turbine's rotation can be kept at a safe speed in faster winds whilemaintaining (nominal) power output. This method is usually not applied on large grid-connected windturbines.

the root of the blade where theboundary layer is thicker(i.e., closestto the hub)



Mechanical braking

A mechanical drum brake or disk brake is used to hold the turbine atrest for maintenance. Such brakes are usually applied only afterblade furling and electromagnetic braking have reduced the turbinespeed, as the mechanical brakes would wear quickly if used to stopthe turbine from full speed. There can also be a stick brake.

Turbine size

For a givensurvivable windspeed, the massof a turbine isapproximatelyproportional tothe cube of itsblade-length.Wind powerintercepted bythe turbine isproportional to the square of its blade-length.[5] The

maximum blade-length of a turbine is limited by both the strength and stiffness of its material.

Labor and maintenance costs increase only gradually with increasing turbine size, so to minimize costs,wind farm turbines are basically limited by the strength of materials, and siting requirements.

Typical modern wind turbines have diameters of 40 to 90 metres (130 to 300 ft) and are rated between500 kW and 2 MW. As of 2011 the most powerful turbine Enercon_E-126 is rated at 7.5 MW.[6]

Generator

For large, commercial size horizontal-axis windturbines, the generator is mounted in a nacelle at thetop of a tower, behind the hub of the turbine rotor.Typically wind turbines generate electricity throughasynchronous machines that are directly connectedwith the electricity grid. Usually the rotational speedof the wind turbine is slower than the equivalentrotation speed of the electrical network - typicalrotation speeds for a wind generators are 5-20 rpmwhile a directly connected machine will have anelectrical speed between 750-3600 rpm. Therefore, agearbox is inserted between the rotor hub and thegenerator. This also reduces the generator cost andweight.

Older style wind generators rotate at a constantspeed, to match power line frequency, which

Dynamic braking resistor for windturbine.A person standing beside medium size modern

turbine blades.

Gearbox, rotor shaft and brake assembly



allowed the use of less costly induction generators. Newer wind turbines often turn at whatever speedgenerates electricity most efficiently. This can be solved using multiple technologies such as doubly fedinduction generators or full-effect converters where the variable frequency current produced is convertedto DC and then back to AC, matching the line frequency and voltage. Although such alternatives requirecostly equipment and cause power loss, the turbine can capture a significantly larger fraction of the windenergy. In some cases, especially when turbines are sited offshore, the DC energy will be transmittedfrom the turbine to a central (onshore) inverter for connection to the grid.

Gearless wind turbine

Commercial size generators have a rotor carrying a field winding so that a rotating magnetic field isproduced inside a set of windings called the stator. While the rotating field winding consumes a fractionof a percent of the generator output, adjustment of the field current allows good control over thegenerator output voltage. Enercon has produced gearless wind turbines with separately excitedgenerators for many years,[7] and Siemens produces a gearless "inverted generator" 3MW model[8][9]

while developing a 6MW model.[10]

In conventional wind turbines, the blades spin a shaft that is connected through a gearbox to thegenerator. The gearbox converts the turning speed of the blades 15 to 20 rotations per minute for a large,one-megawatt turbine into the faster 1,800 rotations per minute that the generator needs to generateelectricity.[11]

Gearless wind turbines (often also called direct drive) get rid of the gearbox completely. Instead, therotor shaft is attached directly to the generator, which spins at the same speed as the blades.

In a turbine generator, magnets spin around a coil to produce current the faster the magnets spin, themore current is induced in the coil. To make up for a direct drive generator's slower spinning rate, thediameter of the generator's rotor is increased hence containing more magnets which lets it create a lot ofpower when turning slowly. To reduce the generator weight some constructors use permanent magnets(PM) in the generators' rotor, while conventional turbine generators use electromagnets copper coils fedwith electricity from the generator itself. Building smaller generators with important torque is still anactive research area to enhance their competitiveness.

Gearless wind turbine are often heavier than gear based wind turbines. A study by the EU calledReliawind www.reliawind.eu based on the largest sample size of turbines, has shown that the reliabilityof gearboxes is not the main problem in a wind turbine. Reliability of direct drive turbines offshore isstill not known, since the sample size is so small.

Experts from Technical University of Denmark estimate that a geared generator with permanentmagnets may use 25 kg/MW of the rare earth element Neodymium, while a gearless may use 250kg/MW.[12]

In December 2011, the US Department of Energy published a report stating critical shortage of rareearth elements such as Neodymium used in large quantities for permanent magnets in gearless windturbines. China produces more than 95% of rare earth elements, while Hitachi holds more than 600patents covering Neodymium magnets. Direct-drive turbines require 600 kg of PM material permegawatt, which translates to several hundred kilograms of rare earth content per megawatt, asNeodymium content is estimated to be 31% of magnet weight. Hybrid drivetrains (intermediate betweendirect drive and traditional geared) use significantly less rare earth materials. While PM wind turbinesonly account for about 5% of the market outside of China, their market share inside of China is



estimated at 25% or higher. Demand for neodymium in wind turbines is estimated to be 1/5 of that inelectric vehicles.[13]

Blades

Blade design

The ratio between the speed of the blade tips and the speed of the wind is called tip speed ratio. Highefficiency 3-blade-turbines have tip speed/wind speed ratios of 6 to 7. Modern wind turbines aredesigned to spin at varying speeds (a consequence of their generator design, see above). Use ofaluminum and composite materials in their blades has contributed to low rotational inertia, which meansthat newer wind turbines can accelerate quickly if the winds pick up, keeping the tip speed ratio morenearly constant. Operating closer to their optimal tip speed ratio during energetic gusts of wind allowswind turbines to improve energy capture from sudden gusts that are typical in urban settings.

In contrast, older style wind turbines were designed with heavier steel blades, which have higher inertia,and rotated at speeds governed by the AC frequency of the power lines. The high inertia buffered thechanges in rotation speed and thus made power output more stable.

The speed and torque at which a wind turbine rotates must be controlled for several reasons:

To optimize the aerodynamic efficiency of the rotor in light winds. To keep the generator within its speed and torque limits. To keep the rotor and hub within their centrifugal force limits. The centrifugal force from the

spinning rotors increases as the square of the rotation speed, which makes this structure sensitive tooverspeed.

To keep the rotor and tower within their strength limits. Because the power of the wind increases asthe cube of the wind speed, turbines have to be built to survive much higher wind loads (such asgusts of wind) than those from which they can practically generate power. Since the blades generatemore torsional and vertical forces (putting far greater stress on the tower and nacelle due to thetendency of the rotor to precess and nutate) when they are producing torque, most wind turbineshave ways of reducing torque in high winds.

To enable maintenance. Since it is dangerous to have people working on a wind turbine while it isactive, it is sometimes necessary to bring a turbine to a full stop.

To reduce noise. As a rule of thumb, the noise from a wind turbine increases with the fifth power ofthe relative wind speed (as seen from the moving tip of the blades). In noise-sensitive environments,the tip speed can be limited to approximately 60 m/s (200 ft/s).

It is generally understood that noise increases with higher blade tip speeds. To increase tip speed withoutincreasing noise would allow reduction the torque into the gearbox and generator and reduce overallstructural loads, thereby reducing cost.[3] The reduction of noise is linked to the detailed aerodynamicsof the blades, especially factors that reduce abrupt stalling. The inability to predict stall restricts thedevelopment of aggressive aerodynamic concepts. .[3]

The hub

In simple designs, the blades are directly bolted tothe hub and hence are stalled. In other moresophisticated designs, they are bolted to the pitch mechanism, which adjusts their angle of attack



according to the wind speed to control theirrotational speed. The pitch mechanism is itselfbolted to the hub. The hub is fixed to the rotor shaftwhich drives the generator through a gearbox. Directdrive wind turbines (also called gearless) areconstructed without a gearbox. Instead, the rotorshaft is attached directly to the generator, whichspins at the same speed as the blades.

Blade count

The determination of the number of blades involvesdesign considerations of aerodynamic efficiency,component costs, system reliability, and aesthetics.Noise emissions are affected by the location of theblades upwind or downwind of the tower and thespeed of the rotor. Given that the noise emissionsfrom the blades' trailing edges and tips vary by the5th power of blade speed, a small increase in tipspeed can make a large difference.

Wind turbines developed over the last 50 years havealmost universally used either two or three blades.Aerodynamic efficiency increases with number ofblades but with diminishing return. Increasing thenumber of blades from one to two yields a sixpercent increase in aerodynamic efficiency, whereasincreasing the blade count from two to three yieldsonly an additional three percent in efficiency.Further increasing the blade count yields minimalimprovements in aerodynamic efficiency andsacrifices too much in blade stiffness as the bladesbecome thinner.

Component costs that are affected by blade count areprimarily for materials and manufacturing of theturbine rotor and drive train. Generally, the fewerthe number of blades, the lower the material andmanufacturing costs will be. In addition, the fewerthe number of blades, the higher the rotational speed can be. This is because blade stiffness requirementsto avoid interference with the tower limit how thin the blades can be manufactured, but only for upwindmachines; deflection of blades in a downwind machine results in increased tower clearance. Fewerblades with higher rotational speeds reduce peak torques in the drive train, resulting in lower gearboxand generator costs.

A Wind turbine hub being installed

The NASA Mod-0 research wind turbine at GlennResearch Center's Plum Brook station in Ohiotested a one-bladed rotor configuration



System reliability is affected by blade countprimarily through the dynamic loading of the rotorinto the drive train and tower systems. Whilealigning the wind turbine to changes in winddirection (yawing), each blade experiences a cyclicload at its root end depending on blade position.This is true of one, two, three blades or more.However, these cyclic loads when combinedtogether at the drive train shaft are symmetricallybalanced for three blades, yielding smootheroperation during turbine yaw. Turbines with one ortwo blades can use a pivoting teetered hub to alsonearly eliminate the cyclic loads into the drive shaftand system during yawing.

Finally, aesthetics can be considered a factor in thatsome people find that the three-bladed rotor is morepleasing to look at than a one- or two-bladed rotor.

Blade materials

Wood and canvas sails were used on early windmillsdue to their low price, availability, and ease ofmanufacture. Smaller blades can be made from lightmetals such as aluminum. These materials, however,require frequent maintenance. Wood and canvas construction limits the airfoil shape to a flat plate,which has a relatively high ratio of drag to force captured (low aerodynamic efficiency) compared tosolid airfoils. Construction of solid airfoil designs requires inflexible materials such as metals orcomposites. Some blades also have incorporated lightning conductors.

New wind turbine designs push power generation from the single megawatt range to upwards of 10megawatts using larger and larger blades. A larger area effectively increases the tip-speed ratio of aturbine at a given wind speed, thus increasing its energy extraction.[14] Computer-aided engineeringsoftware such as HyperSizer (originally developed for spacecraft design) can be used to improve bladedesign.[15][16]

Current production wind turbine blades are as large as 100 meters in diameter with prototypes in therange of 110 to 120 meters. In 2001, an estimated 50 million kilograms of fiberglass laminate were usedin wind turbine blades.[17]

An important goal of larger blade systems is to control blade weight. Since blade mass scales as the cubeof the turbine radius, loading due to gravity constrains systems with larger blades.[18]

Manufacturing blades in the 40 to 50 meter range involves proven fiberglass composite fabricationtechniques. Manufactures such as Nordex and GE Wind use an infusion process. Other manufacturersuse variations on this technique, some including carbon and wood with fiberglass in an epoxy matrix.Options also include prepreg fiberglass and vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding. Each of theseoptions use a glass-fiber reinforced polymer composite constructed with differing complexity. Perhapsthe largest issue with more simplistic, open-mold, wet systems are the emissions associated with the

The 98 meter diameter, two-bladed NASA/DOEMod-5B wind turbine was the largest operatingwind turbine in the world in the early 1990s



volatile organics released. Preimpregnated materials and resin infusion techniques avoid the release ofvolatiles by containing all reaction gases. However, these contained processes have their ownchallenges, namely the production of thick laminates necessary for structural components becomes moredifficult. As the preform resin permeability dictates the maximum laminate thickness, bleeding isrequired to eliminate voids and insure proper resin distribution.[17] One solution to resin distribution apartially preimpregnated fiberglass. During evacuation, the dry fabric provides a path for airflow and,once heat and pressure are applied, resin may flow into the dry region resulting in a thoroughlyimpregnated laminate structure.[17]

Epoxy-based composites have environmental, production, and cost advantages over other resin systems.Epoxies also allow shorter cure cycles, increased durability, and improved surface finish. Prepregoperations further reduce processing time over wet lay-up systems. As turbine blades pass 60 meters,infusion techniques become more prevalent; the traditional resin transfer moulding injection time is toolong as compared to the resin set-up time, limiting laminate thickness. Injection forces resin through athicker ply stack, thus depositing the resin where in the laminate structure before gelatin occurs.Specialized epoxy resins have been developed to customize lifetimes and viscosity.[19]

Carbon fiber-reinforced load-bearing spars can reduce weight and increase stiffness. Using carbon fibersin 60 meter turbine blades is estimated to reduce total blade mass by 38% and decrease cost by 14%compared to 100% fiberglass. Carbon fibers have the added benefit of reducing the thickness offiberglass laminate sections, further addressing the problems associated with resin wetting of thick lay-up sections. Wind turbines may also benefit from the general trend of increasing use and decreasing costof carbon fiber materials.[17]

Tower

Typically, 2 types of towers exist: floating towers and land-based towers.

Tower height

Wind velocities increase at higher altitudes due to surface aerodynamic drag (by land or water surfaces)and the viscosity of the air. The variation in velocity with altitude, called wind shear, is most dramaticnear the surface.

Typically, in daytime the variation follows the windprofile power law, which predicts that wind speedrises proportionally to the seventh root of altitude.Doubling the altitude of a turbine, then, increases theexpected wind speeds by 10% and the expectedpower by 34%. To avoid buckling, doubling thetower height generally requires doubling thediameter of the tower as well, increasing the amountof material by a factor of at least four.

At night time, or when the atmosphere becomesstable, wind speed close to the ground usuallysubsides whereas at turbine hub altitude it does notdecrease that much or may even increase. As a resultthe wind speed is higher and a turbine will producemore power than expected from the 1/7 power law:

Wind turbines generating electricity at the SanGorgonio Pass Wind Farm.



doubling the altitude may increase wind speed by20% to 60%. A stable atmosphere is caused by radiative cooling of the surface and is common in atemperate climate: it usually occurs when there is a (partly) clear sky at night. When the (high altitude)wind is strong (a 10-meter (33 ft) wind speed higher than approximately 6 to 7 m/s (20–23 ft/s)) thestable atmosphere is disrupted because of friction turbulence and the atmosphere will turn neutral. Adaytime atmosphere is either neutral (no net radiation; usually with strong winds and/or heavy clouding)or unstable (rising air because of ground heating—by the sun). Here again the 1/7 power law applies oris at least a good approximation of the wind profile. Indiana had been rated as having a wind capacity of30,000 MW, but by raising the expected turbine height from 50 m to 70 m, the wind capacity estimatewas raised to 40,000 MW, and could be double that at 100 m.[20]

For HAWTs, tower heights approximately two to three times the blade length have been found tobalance material costs of the tower against better utilisation of the more expensive active components.

In Europe, road restrictions makes transportation of towers with a diameter of more than 4.3 m difficult.Swedish analyses show that it is important to have the bottom wing tip at least 30 m above the tree tops,but a taller tower requires a larger tower diameter. A tower profile made of connected shells rather thancylinders can have a larger diameter and still be transportable. A 100 m prototype tower with TC bolted18mm 'plank' shells has been erected at the wind turbine test center Høvsøre in Denmark and certifiedby Det Norske Veritas, with a Siemens nacelle. Shell elements can be shipped in standard 40 footcontainers.[21]

Connection to the electric grid

The Wind turbine is connected to the grid through an inverter which takes the direct current (DC)produced by the generator of the turbine and converts it to alternating current (AC) which can bedirectly exported to the electricity grid network.

Foundations

Wind turbines, by their nature, are very tall slenderstructures,[22] this can cause a number of issueswhen the structural design of the foundations areconsidered.

The foundations for a conventional engineeringstructure are designed mainly to transfer the verticalload (dead weight) to the ground, this generallyallows for a comparatively unsophisticatedarrangement to be used. However in the case ofwind turbines, due to the high wind andenvironmental loads experienced there is asignificant horizontal dynamic load that needs to beappropriately restrained.

This loading regime causes large moment loads tobe applied to the foundations of a wind turbine. As a result, considerable attention needs to be givenwhen designing the footings to ensure that the turbines are sufficiently restrained to operate efficiently.[23] In the current Det Norske Veritas (DNV) guidelines for the design of wind turbines the angular

Wind turbine foundations



deflection of the foundations are limited to 0.5°,[24] DNV guidelines regarding earthquakes suggest thathorizontal loads are larger than vertical loads for offshore wind turbines, while guidelines for tsunamisonly suggest designing for maximum sea waves.[25]

Scale model tests using a 50g centrifuge are being performed at the Technical University of Denmark totest monopile foundations for offshore wind turbines at 30-50m water depth.[26]

Costs

The modern wind turbine is a complex and integrated system. Structural elements comprise the majorityof the weight and cost. All parts of the structure must be inexpensive, lightweight, durable, andmanufacturable, under variable loading and environmental conditions. Turbine systems that have fewerfailures, require less maintenance, are lighter and last longer will lead to reducing the cost of windenergy.

One way to achieve this is to implement well-documented, validated analysis codes, according to a 2011report from a coalition of researchers from universities, industry, and government, supported by theAtkinson Center for a Sustainable Future.[3]

See also

Brushless wound-rotor doubly fed electric machine Vertical-axis wind turbine Wind farm Wind turbine aerodynamics Wind turbine

References

1. ^ a b "Efficiency and performance". UK Department for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform.http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file17821.pdf. Retrieved 2007-12-29.

2. ^ International Standard IEC 61400-1, Third Edition International Electrotechnical Commission, August2005. Accessed: 12 March 2011.

3. ^ a b c d e f Alan T. Zehnder and Zellman Warhaft (27 July 2011). "University Collaboration on WindEnergy". Cornell University Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future.http://www.sustainablefuture.cornell.edu/attachments/2011-UnivWindCollaboration.pdf. Retrieved 22August 2011.

4. ^ Johnson, Scott J.; van Dam, C.P. and Berg, Dale E. (2008). "Active Load Control Techniques for WindTurbines". Sandia National Laboratory. http://www.sandia.gov/wind/other/084809.pdf. Retrieved 13September 2009.

5. ^ Sagrillo, Mick (2010). "SMALL TURBINE COLUMN". Windletter 29 (1).http://www.renewwisconsin.org/wind/Toolbox-Homeowners/Back%20to%20the%20basics%205-Collector%20Size.pdf. Retrieved 19 December 2011.

6. ^ Belgium inaugurates wind farm with largest wind turbines7. ^ Anatomy of an Enercon direct drive wind turbine8. ^ Fairly, Peter. Wind Turbines Shed Their Gears Technology Review, 27 April 2010. Retrieved: 22

September 2010.9. ^ Wittrup, Sanne. First Siemens gearless Ing.dk, 11 August 2010. Retrieved: 15 September 2010.

10. ^ Wittrup, Sanne. 6MW Siemens gearless Ing.dk, 15 September 2010. Retrieved: 15 September 2010.11. ^ How It Works: Gearless wind Turbine



12. ^ Wittrup, Sanne. PMs cause production problems English translation Ing.dk, 1 November 2011. Accessed: 1November 2011.

13. ^ Chu, Steven. Critical Materials Strategy United States Department of Energy, December 2011. Accessed:23 December 2011.

14. ^ Zbigniew Lubosny (2003). Wind Turbine Operation in Electric Power Systems: Advanced Modeling(Power Systems). Berlin: Springer. ISBN 3-540-40340-X.

15. ^ "Materials and design methods look for the 100-m blade". Windpower Engineering. 10 May 2011.http://www.windpowerengineering.com/design/mechanical/materials-and-design-methods-look-for-the-100-m-blade/. Retrieved 22 August 2011.

16. ^ Craig S. Collier (1 October 2010). "From Aircraft Wings to Wind Turbine Blades: NASA Software ComesBack to Earth with Green Energy Applications". NASA Tech Briefs.http://www.techbriefs.com/component/content/article/8602. Retrieved 22 August 2011.

17. ^ a b c d Griffin, Dayton A.; Ashwill, Thomas D. (2003). "Alternative Composite Materials for Megawatt-Scale Wind Turbine Blades: Design Considerations and Recommended Testing". Journal of Solar EnergyEngineering 125 (4): 515. doi:10.1115/1.1629750.

18. ^ Ashwill, T; Laird D (January 2007). "Concepts to Facilitate Very Large Blades". 45th AIAA AerospaceSciences Meeting and Exhibit. AIAA-2007-0817. http://www.sandia.gov/wind/asme/AIAA-2007-0817A.pdf.

19. ^ Christou, P (2007). "Advanced materials for turbine blade manufacture". Reinforced Plastics 51 (4): 22.doi:10.1016/S0034-3617(07)70148-0.

20. ^ Indiana's Renewable Energy Resources21. ^ Emme, Svend. New type of wind turbine tower Metal Industry, 8 August 2011. Accessed: 10 December

2011.22. ^ Lombardi, D. (2010). Long Term Performance of Mono-pile Supported Offshore Wind Turbines. Bristol:

University of Bristol.23. ^ Cox, J. A., & Jones, C. (2010). Long-Term Performance of Suction Caisson Supported Offshore Wind

Turbines. Bristol: University of Bristol.24. ^ Det Norske Veritas (2001). Guidelines for Design of Wind Turbines . Copenhagen: Det Norske Veritas.25. ^ DNV-OS-J101 Design of Offshore Wind Turbine Structures Det Norske Veritas. Accessed: 12 March

2011.26. ^ Rasmussen, Daniel. Wind turbine foundations at 50g (in Danish) Ing.dk, 26 October 2010. 6minute Video

Retrieved: 25 November 2010.

External links

Offshore Wind Turbines - Installation and Operation of Turbines Department of Energy- Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy RenewableUK - Wind Energy Reference and FAQs How is Wind turbine made

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wind_turbine_design&oldid=473819008"Categories:

This page was last modified on 29 January 2012 at 07:38. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms

may apply. See Terms of use for details.Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profitorganization.

Wind turbines



#5 - no of blade

Documents