52181-001: metro manila bridges project

81
Resettlement Plan June 2021 Philippines: Metro Manila Bridges Project Bridge 1: Marcos Highway - St. Mary Bridge Appendices, Volumes 4–5 Prepared by the Department of Public Works and Highways for the Asian Development Bank.

Upload: others

Post on 24-Apr-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Resettlement Plan

June 2021

Philippines: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Bridge 1: Marcos Highway - St. Mary Bridge Appendices, Volumes 4–5

Prepared by the Department of Public Works and Highways for the Asian Development Bank.

Page 2: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

This resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not

necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be

preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

Page 3: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Volume 4 Documentation of Consultation

Meetings and Project Information Brochure

Contents: 1. IEC with Local Government Units

2. 1st Stakeholder Consultation Meeting

3. Focus Group Discussion with Vulnerable Sector

4. Focus Group Discussion with Business Sector

5. 2nd Stakeholder Consultation Meeting

6. List of Invited APs

7. Public Information Brochure

Page 4: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Page | 49

a) IEC

Highlights of the Information, Education and Communication (IEC) Meetings METRO MANILA THREE PRIORITY BRIDGES (MM3PB) PROJECT

SUMMARY OF ISSUES AND CONCERNS Detailed Design Study

Open Forum:

Presented in the matrices are the summary of issues, concerns, comments, and suggestions raised during the Information, Education, and Communication (IEC) Meeting for the Right-of-Way Acquisition Plan (DD RAP) of the Metro Manila Three Priority Bridges Project. Responses to the queries are also included.

Summary of Issues, Concerns, Comments, and Suggestions Raised during the IEC, DD Stage.

• Mentioned that there is a proposed river dike project beneath the Bridge3 – Marikina (Kabayani St.) - Vista Real (Katipunan Ave. Extension ).

• Asked for the elevation of the project to ensure vehicle can still pass through the river dike project in case it pushes through.

• Pointed that the initial elevation used for the river dike project exceeds Tumana Bridge.

• The design elevation used for the Bridge 3 is the elevation of the flood control structure.

• Clarified that the bridge has enough elevation to allow private vehicle to pass through beneath the structure.

• Mentioned that the maximum height is 3m to allow private vehicle to pass through.

• Pointed that the width of the bridge is just enough to accommodate two-lanes.

• Disclosed that there are possible affected structures in bridge 3 alignment.

• Raised that existing structures must be avoided.

• Maintained that some structures might inevitably be affected by the project.

• Reiterated that the elevation will be maintained to ensure there would not be an abrupt decline. Such design must be maintained in conformance to safety standards.

• Mentioned that the grade is maintained from the highest elevation which makes the design longer.

• Asked for the schedule of survey activities.

• Initial survey has been done to identify the center line, alignment, and elevation.

• Mentioned the affected structures will be identified once the survey activities are completed.

• Asked for clarification in Bridge 2 – JP Rizal St. (Homeowner’s Drive) – Lopen Jaena St. alignment.

• Mentioned that there has been a realignment for bridge 2.

Page 5: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Page | 50

• Asked if alignment is possible due to the narrow roads fronting the approach.

• Raised that the alignment will also traverse an open space.

• Clarified that the alignment being asked was already changed to ensure there will be less APs. The latest alignment will have a longer design, but it will not affect any subdivision in Quezon City anymore.

• Asked if there is a structural layout of the bridge.

• Answered that there is structural layout as it will be part of the Detailed Design study that will be undertaken.

Page 6: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Highlights of the Information, Education and Communication (IEC) Meetings METRO MANILA THREE PRIORITY BRIDGES (MM3PB) PROJECT

SUMMARY OF ISSUES AND CONCERNS Detailed Design Study

Online and Onsite Detailed Design (DD) IEC Executive Lounge, 15/F High Rise Building Quezon City Hall Date: 11 January 2021 (Monday) Time: 2:00 P.M. Meeting ID: 847 6965 0339 Password: QuezonCity

Open Forum:

Presented in the matrices are the summary of issues, concerns, comments, and suggestions raised during the Information, Education, and Communication (IEC) Meeting for the Resettlement Plan (RP) of the Metro Manila Three Priority Bridges Project. Responses to the queries are also included.

Summary of Issues, Concerns, Comments, and Suggestions Raised during the IEC, DD Stage.

• It was suggested to change the alignment of the project. The affected road has a limited space at only 20m. In addition, it is in an intersection and it will cross an open space.

• Raised that there were objections and resistance from Homeowners Association (HOA).

• Suggested to revise the alignment on the grounds of HOA resistance.

• Clarified that the there has been a change in the alignment.

• Mentioned that the alignment being discussed during the Feasibility Study (FS) will not be used since the Detailed Design (DD) was realigned to Kabayani St. – Katipunan Ave. Ext.

• It was asked if there is already a structural layout and footing of the bridge.

• Answered that such details are not yet available it will be included in the project’s scope.

• Expresses support that the project may now process.

Page 7: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Highlights of the Detailed Design Study 1st Stakeholder Consultation Meeting (SCM) METRO MANILA THREE PRIORITY BRUDGES (MM3PB)

BRIDGE 1: JP RIZAL ST. (MARCOS HIGHWAY) - ST. MARY AVE. BRIDGE Detailed Design Study Stage

Online Detailed Design (DD) 1st SCM Date: 28 January 2021 (Thursday) Time: 9:00 A.M. Meeting ID: 932 6811 3157 Password: 921364 Open Forum: Presented in the matrices are the summary of issues, concerns, comments, and suggestions raised during the Detailed Design (DD) Study 1st Stakeholder Consultation Meeting for the Right-of-Way Acquisition Plan (RP) of Bridge 1: JP Rizal St. (Marcos Highway) - St. Mary Ave Bridge. Responses to the queries are also included.

Summary of Issues, Concerns, Comments, and Suggestions Raised during the DD 1st SCM of Bridge 1:

JP Rizal St. (Marcos Highway) - St. Mary Ave Bridge for the Metro Manila Three Priority Bridges, DD

Stage

● Asked what would happen to renters

specifically for their rented living space

and business area.

(MS. LUZVIMINDA BERCES, Renter, Brgy. Sto.

Niño - Bridge 2)

● Responded that the purpose of the 1st

SCM is to study the situation of all

Affected Persons (AP).

● No direct answer yet on what will happen

yet with the renters. Reassured that

Philippine policies and ADB social

safeguards are in place to ensure welfare.

● Mentioned that the 2nd SCM will provide

more clarity.

(MS. ANNABELLE HERRERA, RAP Director,

Ecosyscorp, Inc.)

• Assured the APs that they must not

worry because they might not be

affected and this will depend on the

survey results. Proper assistance will be

given if proven that they will be affected.

(MR. RODRIGO DELOS REYES, Project Director,

DPWH)

• Mentioned that proper compensation

cannot be determined yet. However, it

was reiterated the survey will also cover

Page 8: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

renters as if they are affected by the

project

(MS. NESAH JARIEL, Senior Resettlement

Specialist, Ecosyscorp, Inc.)

● Inquired if there is a relocation plan, a

relocation schedule, and supposed site.

Also asked for the project timeline.

(MR. EFREN JOHN SANTOS, Representative, Brgy.

Sto. Niño - Bridge 2)

● Mentioned that the project is in the

Detailed Engineering Design. As for the

construction schedule, if there are no

more delays, it is estimated that the

construction will begin on the middle of

the next year.

● Part of the Detailed Design is the

establishment of limits of the Right of

Way. This will determine extent of impact

to the stakeholders.

● The relocation site will be identified after

the survey since there is no data yet as to

the number of people that are qualified

to avail the relocation benefits.

(MR. RODRIGO DELOS REYES, Project Director,

DPWH)

● Asked if the final affected structures in

Lopez Jaena is already identified.

(MR. CEZAR BAJA Brgy. Jesus dela Peña - Bridge

2)

● Clarified that the final number of affected

structures will be identified after the

survey.

(MR. RODRIGO DELOS REYES, Project Director,

DPWH)

● For Affected structures, there will be a

delineation through ground markings by

the Parcellary team.

● To tagging of structures will commence

right after the Stakeholder Consultation

Meeting. This will be executed together

with the Parcellary Team to determine

the limit of the Right of Way.

(MS. ANNABELLE HERRERA, RAP Director,

Ecosyscorp, Inc.)

● The Census and Tagging will begin on

January 28, 1 pm until February 5 for

Bridges 1 and 2. On the other hand

tagging activities for Bridge 3 is

scheduled on February 8 to February 12

(MR. JOSHUA LADIA, Planning and Research

Associate, Ecosyscorp, Inc.)

Page 9: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

● Made an inquiry on the timeframe of the

construction activities.

● Asked the reason why St. Mary Ave. in

Provident Village was chosen as the

project area.

● Inquired what will be the benefits of the

project to the residents.

● Emphasized that Provident Village is

flood prone area and if the project will

address the flooding problem of the area.

● Further inquired to the kind of

improvements the DPWH is currently

doing for the Marikina River.

● Raised if the construction of the Bridge

will have an impact to the structures

below it and if it will affect the river flow.

(MS. MARIA THERESA ABUEL Resident, Brgy.

Tañong - Bridge 1)

● Answered that the construction will last

for approximately three years if there are

no delays caused by natural calamities.

● The area was chosen as part of three

bridges project since it will ease the

traffic flow in the locality. Based on the

feasibility study, it is the best location for

the bridge.

● Emphasized that one of the benefits of

government infrastructure project is the

increase of land value in nearby land

areas. The commercial areas will also be

more accessible for the residents

because of the bridge.

● The project has no direct impact in

reducing the flood in the area. However,

there is another project by the DPWH in

the area to improve Marikina River.

● Disclosed that there are currently

infrastructures built for flood control

along Brgy. Tumana and a pumping

station along Brgy. Malanday. On the

downstream part of Providence Village,

the Marikina Control Gate Structure will

be put up to regulate water level. There

will also be the Marikina Dam that will be

built in the upstream section of the River.

● Gave assurance that a hydrologist has

studied the possible impact during the

construction so that it will not cause any

flooding to areas that are not flood

prone. However, it was reiterated that

the project is not a flood control

measure.

(MR. RODRIGO DELOS REYES, Project Director,

DPWH)

● Asked for if the tagged structure means

that they have to vacate their area.

(MR. CEZAR BAJA Brgy. Jesus dela Peña - Bridge

2)

● Clarified that the tagging of structure

means that as per the PROW, the

structure will be affected. It is suggested

for the APs to plan ahead if their

structure is really affected so that they

can identify possible areas where they

can relocate. However, there are still

further process for this and the tagging

does not mean that have to leave

immediately.

(MS. ANNABELLE HERRERA, RAP Director,

Ecosyscorp, Inc.)

Page 10: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

● Asked for the significance behind

numbers “1”, “2”, and “3” indicated in

their house as seen in the plan that was

presented to them.

● Further inquired if the numbers signify

severity of impacts to their properties.

● Mentioned that the project plan was

shared by a group within the residents of

Provident Village.

(MS. MARIA THERESA ABUEL, Resident, Brgy.

Tañong - Bridge 1)

● Clarified if the observed number was in

the sticker. Also raised if the plan

mentioned was presented during the

video presentation.

(MS. ANNABELLE HERRERA, RAP Director,

Ecosyscorp, Inc.)

● Pointed out that affected structures will

be verified after the survey. Reassured

that any plans available to the public

should not be the cause of any undue

stress as the survey will determine the

final affected structures and

stakeholders.

(MR. RODRIGO DELOS REYES, Project Director,

DPWH)

● Raised if there will be a relocation both

for the lessor and renters.

(MS. CONSUELO MORANTE, Resident Brgy. Jesus

dela Peña - Bridge 2)

● Answered that the roll out of survey is

intended to identify the affected

stakeholders of the project. Hence, the

survey must also include renters. The

results of the survey will reveal the

entitlements for every stakeholder

affected. The second SCM will have more

details to the possible entitlements.

(MS. ANNABELLE HERRERA, RAP Director,

Ecosyscorp, Inc.)

● Inquired that their compound has

separate titles and that there are many

families in it.

● Asked if there are any plans for cases

such as theirs

(MS. JOAN DE GUZMAN, Resident, Sto. Niño -

Bridge 2)

● Reiterated that cases with multiple titles

is still unknown. There might also be a

chance that not all land titles are within

the PROW which will only be confirmed

after the survey.

● Emphasized that AP in the land titles that

will be affected will be given with proper

compensation as defined by the existing

laws. All the names indicated in the land

titles that is within the PROW will be

compensated. In the event that one of

names indicated in the land title is

deceased, the designated heir will

receive the compensation as per the

existing process.

(MR. RODRIGO DELOS REYES, Project Director,

DPWH)

● Asked if renters will be provided with

relocation.

(MS. CLAIRE VALLEJOS Renter, Brgy. Jesus dela

Peña - Bridge 2)

● Reiterated that there is a need to finish

the census and tagging as well as the

survey first to determine the affected

Page 11: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

stakeholders. Only then will the proper

compensation be identified for the APs.

(MR. RODRIGO DELOS REYES, Project Director,

DPWH)

● Mentioned the results of the study must

be waited out first. Also gave confidence

that the project will be beneficial for all.

However, it was reiterated that

important information must be disclosed

as well as the participation of the

barangay LGUs.

● Emphasized that the result of the study

must also be shared with the barangay

LGUs so that they can also disseminate

with their constituents.

● Pointed out that the barangay is

currently in talks with the environment

and social group of the project.

● Also put emphasis on the importance of

consultation meetings and hoped that

concerns raised by the barangay

constituents are addressed.

(CH. BOB PAMISA, Brgy. Captain, Brgy. Tanong,

Marikina City)

● Recognized and thanked Hon. Bob

Pamisa of Brgy. Tanong for attending the

SCM. Also asked if Ch. Pamisa has any

questions for the project.

(MR. RODRIGO DELOS REYES, Project Director,

DPWH)

● Asked if there is a need to vacate

immediately and if there will be

relocation assistance.

(MS. JOAN DE GUZMAN Resident, Sto. Niño -

Bridge 2)

● Answered that there will be a tagging of

structures and survey first.

● Invited the attendees to participate with

the survey activities so that entitlements

of all the stakeholders are formulated

and identified.

● Mentioned that there will be a

relocation. However, it cannot be

determined yet who can avail it and

where will the relocation be. The status

and profile of APs must first be

established.

● Based on the existing laws and ADB

guidelines, proper entitlements will be

given.

(MS. ANNABELLE HERRERA, RAP Director,

Ecosyscorp, Inc.)

● Reminded the attendees that the demarcation and census and tagging will commence right

after the meeting. Some of the team will be in full PPE suite and mentioned that proper

coordination with the barangay will be ensured so that their presence will not cause any panic

with the residents.

(MS. NESAH JARIEL, Senior Resettlement Specialist, Ecosyscorp, Inc.)

Page 12: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Attendance:

DPWH:

DIR. RODRIGO I. DELOS REYES, Project Director, BMC-UPMO-DPWH ENGR. NORIFEL TEDDIE G. CADIANG, Engineer III, BMC-UPMO-DPWH DR. ROSEMARIE DEL ROSARIO, Chief, ESSD-DPWH MR. MICHAEL BERNH O. VILLEGAS, ESSD-DPWH

DASAN JV:

MR. JU HYEOK UM, Sr. Social/Resettlement Experts (International), Dasan DR. ASHADUL ALAM, Environmental Consultant (International), Dasan

ADB:

MS. TERESITA T. VALDERRAMA, ADB MS. MA. REMEDIOS VILLANUEVA, ADB DR. ERNESTO DELA CRUZ , ADB

ECOSYSCORP, INC.

MS. ANNABELLE HERRERA, RAP Director, EcosysCorp MS. NESAH JARIEL, Senior Resettlement Specialist, EcosysCorp MR. JOSHUA LADIA, Planning and Research Associate, EcosysCorp MS. JAZEL JOPSON, Technical Support Specialist, EcosysCorp MR. RJ SALVADOR, Technical Support Specialist, EcosysCorp

LAST NAME FIRST NAME SEX BARANGAY

Pamisa Bob M Chairman, Brgy. Tañong

Gaspi Vicky F Jesus dela Peña

Dela Cruz Joan F Sto. Niño

Dela Paz Ashley F Jesus dela Peña

Abuel Ma Theresa F Tañong

Domingo Diana F Tañong

Morante Consuelo F Jesus dela Peña

Cadeleña Annabel F Jesus dela Peña

Lasin Janet F Jesus dela Peña

Dominguez Kristofer M Sto. Niño

Berces Luzviminda F Sto. Niño

Santos Marie Joy F Sto. Niño

Generoso Ma. Chele F Jesus dela Peña

San Juan Diana F Jesus dela Peña

de Guzman Joan F Sto. Niño

de Guzman Victoria F Sto. Niño

Enilo Gregorio M Tañong

Carmona Aristoteles, Jr. M Jesus dela Peña

Baja Cezar M Jesus dela Peña

Vallejos Claire F Jesus dela Peña

Forte Gigi F Jesus dela Peña

Dela Cruz Joan F Sto. Niño

Bragais Nelson M Sto. Niño

Reyes Shiela F Jesus dela Peña

Dominguez Thomasin Kae F Jesus dela Peña

Jarque Ricky M Jesus dela Peña

Despi Lilibeth F Jesus dela Peña

Page 13: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Sta Maria Mary Rose F Jesus dela Peña

Rondina Arman M Jesus dela Peña

Caagusan Daeffy F Jesus dela Peña

Estrella Margie F Jesus dela Peña

de Guzman Gerardo M Jesus dela Peña

Bautista Lara F Jesus dela Peña

Magno Natividad M Sto. Niño

Sotero Marcis Sarah F Sto. Niño

Andrade Leonardo M Sto. Niño

Diones Pauline F Sto. Niño

Canila Marilou F Sto. Niño

Tan Frederick M Sto. Niño

Photos:

Page 14: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 15: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 16: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Highlights of the Detailed Design Study 1st Stakeholder Consultation Meeting (SCM) METRO MANILA THREE PRIORITY BRUDGES (MM3PB)

BRIDGE 1: JP RIZAL ST. (MARCOS HIGHWAY) - ST. MARY AVE. BRIDGE Detailed Design Study Stage

Online Detailed Design (DD) 1st SCM Date: 16 February 2021 (Tuesday) Time: 9:00 A.M. Meeting ID: 961 8028 4614 Password: 848687 Open Forum: Presented in the matrices are the summary of issues, concerns, comments, and suggestions raised during the Detailed Design (DD) Study 1st Stakeholder Consultation Meeting for the Right-of-Way Acquisition Plan (RP) of Bridge 1: JP Rizal St. (Marcos Highway) - St. Mary Ave Bridge. Responses to the queries are also included.

Summary of Issues, Concerns, Comments, and Suggestions Raised during the DD 1st SCM of Bridge 1:

JP Rizal St. (Marcos Highway) - St. Mary Ave Bridge, for the Metro Manila Three Priority Bridges, DD

Stage

● Asked if renters must also attend the

Stakeholder Consultation Meeting.

(MS. TINA BERINA, Renter, Brgy. Tañong )

● Mentioned that all the Affected Persons

(APs), even renters, must be consulted.

(MS. ANNABELLE HERRERA, RAP Director,

Ecosyscorp, Inc.)

● Asked if there will also be a compensation for renters.

● Raised concern they would also need to

remove their belongings in their rented

space.

● Asked how much meeting there is for the

project.

● Raised that there have been some

measurements done in the property and

that it has been tagged already.

● Asked how the interview process will be

conducted.

● Asked what will happen if the majority of

the lot will be traversed by the bridge.

● Clarified if the lot will be compensated

assuming only 70%-75% will be affected.

● Inquired if there will be buffer zones in

the bridge’s design.

(MR. JONAH MATTHEW REYES, Renter, Brgy.

Nangka)

● Mentioned that the purpose of the

meeting is to obtain permission to APs

for the RAP activities that will be

conducted.

● Answered that the entitlements will be

presented on the 2nd Stakeholder

Consultation Meeting (SCM).

● Mentioned that the survey activities are

needed to determine the profile and

status of the APs.

● Answered that there will be two

meetings for the project.

● Clarified that tagging cannot proceed

without approval from the residents. The

team might have acquired approval from

other residents.

● Answered that the interview may be

done via call center or through an onsite

set-up.

● Mentioned that the extent of the project

will be determined after the ground

survey activities.

Page 17: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

● Pointed that there are guidelines for the

severity of impacts and will be matched

with the proper entitlements.

(MS. ANNABELLE HERRERA, RAP Director,

Ecosyscorp, Inc.)

● Answered that percentage of property

affected is not being presented so that

APs will not have a wrong impression.

● Reiterated that the measurement will be

derived from the ground survey activities.

● Mentioned that the demarcation line

represents the limit of the Project Right

of Way (PROW) and that the buffer zone

is already part of it.

● Raised that the complete limit of the

project will only be determined after the

ground survey activities.

(MR. RODRIGO DELOS REYES, Project Director,

DPWH)

● Mentioned that the bridge is too close

with the existing bridge in Brgy. Tumana.

● Suggested to realign the project

somewhere between Tumana Bridge and

Batasan Bridge

● Pointed that the bridge must be limited

to the Riverbank and must not be

extended since it seems like a viaduct is

being constructed.

● Clarified if the project aims to address

the flooding in the area.

● Raised that the projects to address

flooding must be prioritized.

(MR. PABLO AMISTOSO, Resident, Brgy. Nangka)

● Answered that the suggestion was

already studied.

● Pointed that the current alignment is

based on the most appropriate location

of the bridge based on the study with the

least number of APs.

● Disclosed that such extension was made

to increase the height of the bridge as a

mitigation measure against flood.

● Disclosed that there are different

projects to address flooding in Marikina

City.

● Mentioned that the project is also

designed with adaptive specification to

climate change.

(MR. RODRIGO DELOS REYES, Project Director,

DPWH)

● Asked if the alignment is final and if it is

possible for adjustments to be made.

● Inquired for the project phases of the

civil works.

● Asked for the project’s timeline.

(MR. JONAH MATTHEW REYES, Renter, Nangka)

● Mentioned that the design length has

been studied to ensure that extreme

flood will not reach the bridge.

● Disclosed that changes in alignment

might not be possible anymore.

● Answered that all bridges will be

constructed at the same time.

● Mentioned that the civil works will begin

on the middle of the next year and that

the project is expected to run for three

years.

Page 18: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

(MR. RODRIGO DELOS REYES, Project Director,

DPWH)

Attendance:

DPWH:

DIR. RODRIGO I. DELOS REYES, Project Director, BMC-UPMO-DPWH ENGR. NORIFEL TEDDIE G. CADIANG, Engineer III, BMC-UPMO-DPWH

DASAN JV:

MR. JU HYEOK UM, Sr. Social/Resettlement Experts (International), Dasan DR. ASHADUL ALAM, Environmental Consultant (International), Dasan

DCCD:

ENGR. CORNELIO CATACUTAN, DCCD

ADB:

MS. TERESITA T. VALDERRAMA, ADB MS. MA. REMEDIOS VILLANUEVA, ADB DR. ERNESTO DELA CRUZ , ADB MS. MARY ANN BOTENGAN, ADB

ECOSYSCORP, INC.

MS. ANNABELLE HERRERA, RAP Director, EcosysCorp MS. NESAH JARIEL, Senior Resettlement Specialist, EcosysCorp MR. JOSHUA LADIA, Planning and Research Associate, EcosysCorp MS. JAZEL JOPSON, Technical Support Specialist, EcosysCorp MR. RJ SALVADOR, Technical Support Specialist, EcosysCorp

LAST NAME FIRST NAME SEX BARANGAY

Sajines Beth F Nangka

Amistoso Carlos M Nangka

Turalba Manolito M Old Balara

Berina Tina F Jesus dela Peña

De Leon Roberto M Tañong

Reyes Jonah Matthew M Nangka

Photos:

Page 19: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 20: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 21: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Highlights of the Detailed Design Study Focus Group Discussion (FGD) METRO MANILA THREE PRIORITY BRUDGES (MM3PB)

BRIDGE 1: JP RIZAL ST. (MARCOS HIGHWAY) - ST. MARY AVE. BRIDGE Detailed Design Study Stage

Online Detailed Design (DD) FGD – Vulnerable and Business Sector Date: 16 February 2021 (Tuesday) Time: 9:00 A.M.

Presented in the matrices below are the highlights during the Focus Group Discussion (FGD) for the

Bridge 1: JP Rizal St. (Marcos Highway) - St. Mary Ave. Bridge. Affected Persons (AP) were designated

as either as vulnerable or business sector. Due to few numbers of participants, this session

comprised of representatives from both sectors. However, their responses were disaggregated to

provide proper context on the sectors. The session was conducted online through Zoom Application.

Consent was also gathered before the FGD was conducted.

Responses from Business Sector

1. What are your apprehensions/concerns regarding the potential impact of the project on your livelihood/business?

• Not much effect on livelihood since her spouse is working on another city.

• Mentioned that the project will improve the transportation in their area. In addition Pasig City will be more accessible.

• Businesses such as leasing space and sari-sari stores will be displaced during the construction of the project.

2. What support programs or projects do you think are necessary to help you cope with the possible impacts of the project on your livelihood/business?

• There must be livelihood programs provided for affected businesses.

• A similar livelihood may be provided for affected businesses. There may also be assistance in putting up a sari-sari store.

3. What kind of help do you expect from the Government in the implementation of these programs and projects?

• There must be financial assistance to affected businesses.

• Such financial assistance will be used as a starting money in rebuilding the business.

4. What kind of help do you expect from the private sector in the implementation of these programs and projects?

• Mentioned that they are not expecting any assistance from the private sector.

5. Are you familiar with a cooperative? What are your thoughts about forming a cooperative?

• Unfamiliar with cooperatives.

6. Do you have a proposed resettlement site? Can you identify which barangay?

• Unfamiliar with possible resettlement sites.

Page 22: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Responses from Vulnerable Sector

1. What are your apprehensions/concerns regarding the potential impact of the project on your livelihood/business?

• The project will traverse the property where they are currently staying and the space where they park their vehicles will be taken.

• The equipment that will be used in the project might block their access to their property.

• The project might cause a lot of noise pollution to the community.

• Raised concern that they will have to locate a new area to put their vehicles if the property is taken away.

• Pointed that it will be difficult to seek another area to rent given the pandemic.

2. What support programs or projects do you think are necessary to help you cope with the possible impacts of the project on your livelihood/business?

• Provision of assistance in seeking areas to relocate their belongings as well as their jeepneys.

• There must be livelihood assistance for affected stakeholders.

• There must be assistance for everyday expenses in the relocation area.

• Prefers to have their own property so they would not have to pay for rent anymore.

3. What kind of help do you expect from the Government in the implementation of these programs and projects?

• The relocation must have a garage space to put their jeepneys.

• There must also be assistance in purchasing a new lot as well as a living space for other drivers.

• Provision of assistance in putting up a garage space for their vehicles.

• Financial assistance for them to locate a new area to rent.

• Provide financial assistance to spouse to put up an alternative livelihood such as a sari-sari store.

4. What kind of help do you expect from the private sector in the implementation of these programs and projects?

• Private sector may provide relief assistance such as grocery items and rice.

5. Are you familiar with a cooperative? What are your thoughts about forming a cooperative?

• Cooperatives have different objective based on its members.

• Not expecting much assistance from cooperatives.

6. Do you have a proposed resettlement site? Can you identify which barangay?

• Resettlement may be at Brgy Sto. Niño or at Brgy. Barangka

Attendance:

DASAN JV:

Page 23: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

MR. JU HYEOK UM, Sr. Social/Resettlement Experts (International), Dasan

DCCD:

ENGR. CORNELIO CATACUTAN, DCCD

ECOSYSCORP, INC.

MR. JOSHUA LADIA, Planning and Research Associate, EcosysCorp MS. JAZEL JOPSON, Technical Support Specialist, EcosysCorp MR. RJ SALVADOR, Technical Support Specialist, EcosysCorp

Last Name First Name Barangay

Bañaga Jesus Jesus dela Peña

Domingo Diana Marie Tañong

Page 24: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Photos:

Page 25: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Highlights of the Detailed Design Stage 2nd Stakeholder Consultation Meeting (SCM) METRO MANILA THREE PRIORITY BRUDGES (MM3PB)

BRIDGE 1: JP RIZAL ST. (MARCOS HIGHWAY) - ST. MARY AVE. BRIDGE Detailed Design Study Stage

Online Detailed Design (DD) 2nd SCM Date: 8 March 2021 (Monday) Time: 9:00 A.M. Meeting ID: 952 4899 3634 Password: 898910 Open Forum: Presented in the matrices are the summary of issues, concerns, comments, and suggestions raised during the Detailed Design (DD) Study 2nd Stakeholder Consultation Meeting for the Right-of-Way Acquisition Plan (RP) of Bridge 1: JP Rizal St. (Marcos Highway) - St. Mary Ave Bridge. Responses to the queries are also included.

Summary of Issues, Concerns, Comments, and Suggestions Raised during the DD 2nd SCM of Bridge

1: JP Rizal St. (Marcos Highway) - St. Mary Ave Bridge, for the Metro Manila Three Priority Bridges,

DD Stage

● Asked for the project’s severity of impact

on their property.

● Pointed that the demarcation line will

only affect a portion of their property

and will not affect their structure

● Inquired if the method of acquiring will

be through easement agreement.

(MS. MARY ANN TURALBA, Representative, Brgy.

Jesus dela Peña)

● Assured the AP that the structure will not

be affected of the demarcation line only

covers their fence.

● Concurred that the Department of Public

Works and Highways (DPWH) may offer

easement agreement if only a minimal

portion of their property will be affected.

(MS. ANNABELLE HERRERA, RAP Director,

Ecosyscorp, Inc.)

● Disclosed that demarcation lines are

already laid in their property. Half of their

structure will be affected.

● Asked if the whole structure and lot will

be paid given the context.

● Asked if there will be next Resettlement

Action Plan activities for their property

and household.

(MS. MA THERESA ABUEL, Resident, Brgy.

Tañong)

● Answered that if the assessment shows

that their structure is severely affected,

there will be full compensation for the

whole structure.

● Mentioned that Resettlement Action Plan

will be finalized and the second

Stakeholder Consultation Meeting is the

final activity of Ecosyscorp. The next

interface will be initiated by the DPWH in

which the department will send the

Notice of Taking (NoT).

● Mentioned that DPWH will send a letter

stating that their property is officially

affected.

Page 26: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

● Pointed that the NoT will also contain the

needed documents as proof of

ownership.

● Added that as per stated in the law, once

the NoT is received, further construction

in their property is prohibited.

(MS. ANNABELLE HERRERA, RAP Director,

Ecosyscorp, Inc.)

● Asked for the time-frame of the project.

● Inquired if demolition will start by next

year.

● Clarified if they must vacate the property

before July.

● Asked if the study and compensation is

completed by July.

(MS. MA THERESA ABUEL, Resident, Brgy.

Tañong)

● Mentioned that the estimated time-

frame for the construction is by the

second quarter of the next year around

June or July.

● Confirmed that the AP must vacate the

property before July.

● Stated that the Resettlement Action Plan

is expected to by finalizned by April or

May of this year. This will be followed

with the distribution of NoT.

● Assured the AP that DPWH will ensure

consistent coordination for a smooth

process.

(ENGR. NORIFEL TEDDIE CADIANG, Engineer III,

DPWH)

● Added that as per Asian Development

Bank (ADB) policy, there will be no

displacement unless full compensation is

provided.

(MS. ANNABELLE HERRERA, RAP Director,

Ecosyscorp, Inc.)

● Inquired about the Bridge’s alignment

and where will the approach start in

Provident Village.

● Asked if the bridge will also cover the

church in the Provident Village.

● Requested for a copy of the alignment.

(MS. MARY ANN TURALBA, Representative, Brgy.

Jesus dela Peña)

● Presented the bridge alignment.

● Answered that that the alignment along

St. Mary Avenue will be provided.

(ENGR. NORIFEL TEDDIE CADIANG, Engineer III,

DPWH)

● Disclosed that they were not able to

attend the first SCM.

● Asked what was discussed during the first

SCM.

● Requested a copy of the Bridge’s plan.

● Answered that the topics presented for

first SCM were the project overview and

Resettlement Action Plan Activities which

covers the Parcellary Survey, Census and

Page 27: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

● Asked for a copy of Minutes during the

frist SCM.

(MS. ROSARIO CARLOS, Representative,

Riverbanks Development Corporation)

Tagging of Structures, and Detalied

Measurement Survey.

● Mentioned that the first SCM intends to

inform the APs what the Ecosyscorp staff

will be doing during the condcuct of the

aforementioned activities.

● Raised that the legal framework was also

presented, in particular, the R.A. 10752

and the ADB Safeguard Policy of 2009.

(MS. ANNABELLE HERRERA, RAP Director,

Ecosyscorp, Inc.)

● Disclosed that there will be an official

letter for Riverbanks Development

Corporation which will be sent within the

week.

● Mentioned that a meeting will be

requested with the officials of Riverbanks

Development Corporation.

(ENGR. NORIFEL TEDDIE CADIANG, Engineer III,

DPWH)

● Requested for the Bridge’s plan as well as

the Minutes of the meeting for first and

second SCM.

(MS. MA THERESA ABUEL, Resident, Brgy.

Tañong)

● Mentioned that the necessary

documents will be provided.

(ENGR. NORIFEL TEDDIE CADIANG, Engineer III,

DPWH)

● Requested for the Minutes of the

meeting for first SCM as well as the

Bridge’s plan.

(MS. MARY ANN TURALBA, Representative, Brgy.

Jesus dela Peña)

● Answered that the doucments requested

will be sent through email.

(ENGR. NORIFEL TEDDIE CADIANG, Engineer III,

DPWH)

● Inquired for the Bridge’s effect in the

local traffic situation in parrticular, its

effect in Provident Village.

(MS. MARY ANN TURALBA, Representative, Brgy.

Jesus dela Peña)

● Answered that the traffic flow will be

coordinated coordinated with the local

government of Marikina City once the

project is completed.

● Raised that there might be local

ordinances that prohibit certain types of

vehicle that may use the bridge since the

project is within the vicinity of a

residential area.

(ENGR. NORIFEL TEDDIE CADIANG, Engineer III,

DPWH)

● Also requested for the Minutes of the

first and second SCM as well as the

Bridge’s plan.

(MS. ROSALINDA CHICANO, Representative, Brgy.

Tañong)

● Answered that the requested documents

will be provided including the

presentations used.

(ENGR. NORIFEL TEDDIE CADIANG, Engineer III,

DPWH)

Page 28: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

● Requested to the APs, specifically for those who requested the copy of the Minutes of the

Meeting, to make sure that their email address were indicated in the attendance sheet.

● Also mentioned that the APs may also send their emails through the Zoom Application chat.

(MS. ANNABELLE HERRERA, RAP Director, Ecosyscorp, Inc.)

Attendance:

DPWH:

ENGR. JUDEE ANN SANTILLAN, Project Manager, BMC-UPMO-DPWH ENGR. NORIFEL TEDDIE CADIANG, Engineer III, BMC-UPMO-DPWH

DASAN JV:

MR. JU HYEOK UM, Sr. Social/Resettlement Experts (International), Dasan

ADB:

MS. TERESITA T. VALDERRAMA, ADB MS. MA. REMEDIOS VILLANUEVA, ADB

ECOSYSCORP, INC.

MS. ANNABELLE HERRERA, RAP Director, EcosysCorp MS. NESAH JARIEL, Senior Resettlement Specialist, EcosysCorp MR. JOSHUA LADIA, Planning and Research Associate, EcosysCorp MS. JAZEL JOPSON, Technical Support Specialist, EcosysCorp MR. RJ SALVADOR, Technical Support Specialist, EcosysCorp MR. ELLY JONES FERNANDEZ, Technical Support Specialist, EcosysCorp

LAST NAME FIRST NAME SEX BARANGAY

Dominguez Tammy M Jesus dela Peña

Ledda Jun Bartolome

M Barangka

Alfaro Marites F Barangka

Chicano Rosalinda F Tañong

Carlos Rosario F Barangka

Enilo Emma F Tañong

Abuel Ma Theresa F Tañong

Enilo Evelyn F Tañong

Dela Rosa JP M Jesus dela Peña

Turalba Mary Ann F Jesus dela Peña

Page 29: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Photos:

Page 30: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 31: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Control Number Name Brgy. Contact Number Prefix Network Classification Date Received Preferred SCM Option  Date Time Venue Assigned to Status Notes 01.27 PM

MM3PB2020-000007 Fely Angeles JDP 9480747 Landline Landline Jan 25, 2021 ONLINE 28-Jan-21 9AM Zoom Link RPD Ring only 4 attempt

MM3PB2020-000010 Arlene Panes JDP 09277206857 0927 Globe/TM Jan 25, 2021 Onsite ONLINE 28-Jan-21 9AM Multi Purpose Hall, Brgy Jesus De la Peña, Brgy Jesus De la PeñaJSC Confirmed onsite Convert to onsite

MM3PB2020-000027 Eliseo Dela Paz, Jr. JDP 09232767823 0923 Sun Owner Jan 25, 2021 Onsite ONLINE 28-Jan-21 9AM Multi Purpose Hall, Brgy Jesus De la Peña, Brgy Jesus De la PeñaJAM Confirmed onsite Rep. Rowena Dela Paz Convert to onsite

MM3PB2020-000001 Jaime Pangunzan Tañong 09072468279 0907 TNT Jan 22, 2021 Onsite ONLINE 28-Jan-21 9AM Zoom Link JAM Cannot be reached

MM3PB2020-000003 Emma Enilo Tañong 09656454285 0965 Globe/TM Jan 22, 2021 ONLINE 28-Jan-21 9AM Zoom Link JSC Cannot be reached

MM3PB2020-000084 Marlou Bautista Sto. Niño 09504962954 0950 TNT Jan 26, 2021 ONLINE 28-Jan-21 9AM Zoom Link ECO Confirmed Representative: Lara Bautista

MM3PB2020-000083 Myron Bautista Sto. Niño 09504962954 0950 TNT Jan 26, 2021 ONLINE 28-Jan-21 9AM Zoom Link KEI Confirmed Representative: Lara Bautista

MM3PB2020-000082 Shela Bautista Sto. Niño 09504962954 0950 TNT Jan 26, 2021 ONLINE 28-Jan-21 9AM Zoom Link KEI Confirmed Representative: Lara Bautista

MM3PB2020-000081 Michael Bautista Sto. Niño 09504962954 0950 TNT Jan 26, 2021 ONLINE 28-Jan-21 9AM Zoom Link KEI Confirmed Representative: Lara Bautista

MM3PB2020-000060 Norma Bautista Sto. Niño 09504962954 0950 TNT Jan 26, 2021 ONLINE 28-Jan-21 9AM Zoom Link KEI Confirmed Representative: Lara Bautista

MM3PB2020-000071 Donna May Manaygay Sto. Niño 09614008086 0961 Smart Jan 26, 2021 ONLINE 28-Jan-21 9AM Zoom Link ECO Unattended

MM3PB2020-000070 Dionisio Manaysay Sto. Niño 09614008086 0961 Smart Jan 26, 2021 ONLINE 28-Jan-21 9AM Zoom Link ECO Unattended

MM3PB2020-000069 Carl Vincent De Guzman Sto. Niño 09614008086 0961 Smart Jan 26, 2021 ONLINE 28-Jan-21 9AM Zoom Link ECO Unattended

MM3PB2020-000068 Cyrel De Guzman Alfonso Sto. Niño 09614008086 0961 Smart Jan 26, 2021 ONLINE 28-Jan-21 9AM Zoom Link ECO Unattended

MM3PB2020-000067 Marilon De Guzman Sto. Niño 09614008086 0961 Smart Jan 26, 2021 ONLINE 28-Jan-21 9AM Zoom Link ECO Unattended

Robert Canapi Caretaker JPV

Belen Arada Owner JPV

MM3PB2020-000061 Joan Dela Cruz Sto Nino 09163348239 0916 Globe/TM Renter Online Jan 26, 2021 ###### ONLINE 9AM Zoom Link ECO Confirmed online

MM3PB2020-000055 Crisangelo Valveza Sto Nino 09338672884 0933 Sun Jan 26, 2021 ###### ONLINE 9AM Zoom Link RPD Confirmed online

MM3PB2020-000054 Eduardo Malbas Sto Nino 09562560012 0956 Globe/TM Onsite Jan 26, 2021 ###### ONLINE 9AM Zoom Link RPD Cannot be reached

MM3PB2020-000046 Jordan J. Aloro Sto Nino 09517277446 0951 Smart Renter Online Jan 26, 2021 ###### ONLINE 9AM Zoom Link KEI Unattended & out of coverage area

Ma. Cathleen Lhey P. PempengcoSto Nino RPD

Elna Llabares Sto Nino RPD` Jan 26, 2021 ###### ONLINEMM3PB2020-000057 09505930350 0950 TNT

Cannot be reachedGlobe/TMMM3PB2020-000037 JDP 09061120967 0906

9AM Zoom Link Unattended & out of coverage area

List of Invited APs for 1st SCM 2021 Jan 27

Jan 25, 2021 ONLINE 28-Jan-21 9AM Zoom Link

Page 32: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Control Number Name Brgy. Bridge Covered Contact Number Prefix Network Classification Date Received Option  Date Time Venue Status Notes 02.15

MM3PB2020-000283Marieta M. Cruz

Virginia BalmedinaTanong Bridge 1 688-17-04

Landline Landline Non-resident/Business Owner 11-Feb ONLINE 16-Feb 9AM Zoom Link Number not exist JAM

MM3PB2020-000288 Larry Borlagdan Tanong Bridge 1 -- -- -- Owner- Residing 11-Feb ONLINE 16-Feb 9AM Zoom Link No contact number

MM3PB2020-000282 Teresita Sementina Tanong Bridge 1 09669136143 0966 Globe/TM Owner- Residing 11-Feb ONLINE 16-Feb 9AM Zoom Link Out of coverage area JAM

MM3PB2020-000291Oscar Angat

Kristofer IrmanJDP Bridge 1

09150090264/09380749681/ 02-70013156 0915 Globe/TM Owner- Residing 11-Feb ONLINE 16-Feb 9AM Zoom Link Confirmed to Online JAM

MM3PB2020-000293 Manold Y. Libunao JDP Bridge 1 09054305384 0905 Globe/TM Owner 11-Feb ONLINE 16-Feb 9AM Zoom Link Confirmed to Online JAM

MM3PB2020-000292 Kristofer Irman JDP Bridge 1 09399360175 0939 Smart Renter 11-Feb ONLINE 16-Feb 9AM Zoom Link Out of coverage area JAM

MM3PB2020-000294 Tina Berina JDP Bridge 1 09065722955 0906 Globe/TM Renter 11-Feb ONLINE 16-Feb 9AM Zoom Link Confirmed to Online KEI

MM3PB2020-000290 Gloria D. Songco JDP Bridge 1 09209836232 0920 Smart Owner-non residing 11-Feb ONLINE 16-Feb 9AM Zoom Link Confirmed to Online KEI

MM3PB2020-000290 Normen Dizon JDP Bridge 1 09420671490 0942 Sun Caretaker 11-Feb ONLINE 16-Feb 9AM Zoom Link Confirmed to Online KEI

MM3PB2020-000289 Gregorio Bayani JDP Bridge 1 -- -- -- 11-Feb ONLINE 16-Feb 9AM Zoom Link No contact number

-- Mr. Reyes -- Bridge 3 09177165104/ 09637202020 0917 Globe/TM 12-Feb ONLINE 16-Feb 9AM Zoom Link Confirmed to Online KEI

List of Invited APs for Bridge 1 (2021 Feb 16)

Page 33: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Control Number Name Barangay Municipality Mobile Number Prefix Network Option Time Date Venue Status

MM3PB2021-001040 Mary Ann Songco Toralba Jesus Dela Pena Marikina 09999149544 0999 Smart ONLINE 8:30AM ##### Zoom Confirmed

MM3PB2020-000016 Thomasine Kaye Inferio Dominguez Jesus Dela Pena Marikina 09171043623 0917 Globe/TM ONLINE 8:30AM ##### Zoom Confirmed

MM3PB2020-000003 Emma Manito Enilo Tañong Marikina 09656454285 0965 Globe/TM ONLINE 8:30AM ##### Zoom Confirmed

MM3PB2021-001001 Evelyn Manito Enilo Tañong Marikina 09562359427 0956 Globe/TM ONLINE 8:30AM ##### Zoom Confirmed

MM3PB2020-000001 Jane Lim Pagunsan Tañong Marikina 09108289519 0910 TNT ONLINE 8:30AM ##### Zoom Confirmed

MM3PB2020-000006 Jonathan Mamangon Domingo Tañong Marikina 09338206993 0933 Sun ONLINE 8:30AM ##### Zoom Confirmed

MM3PB2020-000005 Maria Theresa Dumrique Abuel Tañong Marikina 09178122453 0917 Globe/TM ONLINE 8:30AM ##### Zoom Confirmed

MM3PB2020-000172 Marieta Manlangit Cruz Tañong Marikina 09176248155 0917 Globe/TM ONLINE 8:30AM ##### Zoom Confirmed

MM3PB2020-000004 Martin Francisco Dela Rosa Tañong Marikina 09264098845 0926 Globe/TM ONLINE 8:30AM ##### Zoom Confirmed

MM3PB2021-001007 Richard Sosa Vitto Tañong Marikina 09060047993 0906 Globe/TM ONLINE 8:30AM ##### Zoom Confirmed

MM3PB2021-001039 Teresita Santiago Cementina Tañong Marikina 09669136143 0966 Globe/TM ONLINE 8:30AM ##### Zoom Confirmed

List of Invited APs for 2nd SCM 2021 March 8

Page 34: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Ano ang proyekto? Ang Metro Manila Bridges Project ay kabilang sa Build, Build, Build Program ng pamahalaan na naglalayong magdagdag ng tulay upang maibsan ang problema sa trapiko sa EDSA at iba pang pangunahing kalsada ng kalakhang Maynila.

Tatlong mga tulay ang napapaloob sa proyekto gaya ng Kabayani Road-Katipunan Ave. Extension Bridge, J.P. Rizal-Lopez Jaena Bridge at Marcos Highway-St. Mary Ave. Bridge. Ang pagsasakatuparan ng mga ito ay:

Magbibigay ng daanang matibay laban sa baha at iba pang sakuna at makakatulong maibsan ang masikip na trapiko sa kamaynilaan. Makakamit ang inirekomendang kaligtasan sa baha ng Pasig-Marikina River Basin sa pamamagitan ng pagkakaroon ng higit na “access” sa ilog para sa operasyon at pamamahala nito. Magpapabuti sa kondisyon ng pamumuhay at lilikha ng mas positibong epekto sa ekonomiya. Dinisenyo para maging kaaya-aya at simbolo/ modelo.

Saan at ano ang nasasakupan ng proyekto?

Sino/Ano ang mga potensyal na epekto sa lipunan ng proyekto?

Mga mamamayang nakatira malapit sa ilog na pag- tatayuan ng tulay. Maaaring maapektuhan ang kanilang mga ari-arian gaya ng lupa, istruktura (bahay o tinda- han), punong-kahoy, mga pananim at pati na rin pam- publikong pasilidad (basketball court, outpost, electric post at iba pa). Kasama rin sa mga maaaring maaapektuhan ang mga negosyo.

Sino ang karapat-dapat para sa mga kabayaran ng mga apektadong ari-arian?

Nagmamay-ari ng lupa. Kailangan ng patunay ng pagmamay-ari gaya ng Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT). Nagmamay-ari ng istruktura (bahay at iba pa). Kailangan may Tax Declaration at iba pang patunay ng pagmamay-ari. Nagmamay-ari ng puno at pananim. Ang kabayaran ay base sa klase ng puno at pananim. Kailangan ng sertipikasyon ng pagmamay-ari mula sa barangay. “Vulnerable”. Ang mga “informal settler families”, matatanda, solong babae na tagapaghanapbuhay at may kapansanan ay bibigyan ng tulong. Mga nagmamayari ng negosyo o maglalako. Apektadong mamamayan na posibleng maantala pansamantala o permanenteng mawawalan ng han- apbuhay o pagkakakitaan ay bibigyan ng tulong.

Ano epekto ng proyekto sa kapaligiran? At paano ito mababawasan?

Ang mga nabanggit na epekto ay kailangan mapatunayan at makumpirma gamit ang tamang pamamaraan ng pagmamapa o “survey” kaugnay sa panlipunan at aktwal na kondisyong pisikal. Mayroon ding pangangailangan sa pagbibigay ng mahahalagang impor- masyon tungkol sa iminungkahing proyekto at makonsulta ang mga ma- mamayan sa mga bagay na naka-

PAMPUBLIKONG IMPORMASYON NG METRO MANILA BRIDGES

PROJECT

Kabayani Road-Katipunan Ave. Extension Bridge

J.P. Rizal– Lopez Jaena Bridge

Marcos Highway-St. Mary Ave. Bridge

Inaasahan po ang inyong aktibong pakikilahok sa ating projekto.

Salamat po! Tulay Lokasyon Apektadong Lugar Haba ng Tulay

Kabayani Road-Katipunan Ave. Extension Bridge

Sa pagitan ng Tuma- na Bridge at Batasan -San Mateo Bridge

Barangay Matandang Balara ng Lungsod ng Quezon at Barangay Nangka ng Lungsod ng Marikina

175 metro

J.P. Rizal- Lopez Jaena Bridge

Sa pagitan ng Tuma- na Bridge at Mariki- na Bridge

Barangay Jesus Dela Peña at Sto. Niño ng Lungsod ng Marikina

130 metro

Marcos Highway-St. Mary Ave. Bridge

Sa pagitan ng Mariki- na Bridge at Marcos Bridge

Barangay Jesus Dela Peña at Calumpang ng Lungsod ng Marikina

114 metro

Sino ang magpapatupad ng proyekto? Ang Unified Project Management Office - Bridge Man- agement Cluster (UPMO-BMC) ng Kagawaran ng Paga- waing Pampubliko at mga Lansangan (Department of Public Works and Highways) ang magpapatupad ng proyekto. Ito ang tanggapan na responsable sa pagpaplano, pagdidisenyo, pangan- gasiwa at iba pang gawain patungkol sa proyekto.

Page 35: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Ilog at sapa (Surface water) Walang mga sasakyan at gamit pangkonstruksyon ang dapat na nakaparada, kinukumpuni o kinakargahan ng krudo, gasolina at langis malapit sa Ilog Marikina. Magtayo ng mga palikuran o sanitary facility para sa mga manggagawa. Mahigpit na atasan ang kontratista at mga manggagawa nito na sumunod sa wastong pagtatapon ng basura at wastong kalinisan. Pagtakda ng buffer zone ng konstruksiyon at mga containment barriers. Sundin ang alituntunin sa pagtitipid ng tubig at pagbuti- hin ang pangangasiwa ng tubig.

Tubig sa ilalim ng lupa (Ground water) Isagawa ang pagmentina ng mga kagamitang pangkon- struksyon sa tamang lugar at paraan para maiwasan ang spills at kontaminasyon sa lupa. Maglagay ng mga interceptor ng langis sa mga sa washdown at refueling areas. Ang mga patapong langis at basahan ay dapat itabi at itapon alinsunod sa RA 6969.

Þ Posibleng pagbabago sa daloy ng ilog at mga drain- age sa panahon ng konstruksyon

Þ Posibleng pagbaba ng kalidad ng tubig sa Ilog Marikina

Þ Potensyal na kontaminasyon ng tubig sa ilalim ng lupa (groundwater)

Kalidad at dami ng tubig

Magpatupad ng mga kontrol para sa erosion at pagguho ng lupa. Magtalaga ng isang lugar ng imbakan ng basura/spoils. Itabi ang topsoil para magamit sa ibang pagkakataon. Hangga’t maari, isagawa ang konstruksyon sa tag-araw Patibayin ang dike gamit ang mga damo at iba pang pansuklob sa lupa. Ipatupad ang RA 9003 (Ecological Solid Waste Manage- ment Act of 2000). Pagsasanay ng mga manggagawa ukol sa kalusugan at kaligtasan at pagpapanatili ng kaayusan ng paligid at tirahan ng mga manggagawa (housekeeping).

Þ Pisikal na pagbabago ng lupa Þ Potensyal na kontaminasyon ng lupa mula sa basura

Kondisyon ng lupa Þ Pagkasira ng kalidad ng hangin Þ Sobrang ingay na dulot ng paggamit ng kagamitan

para sa operasyon

Gumamit ng saradong sasakyan (closed) para sa mga materyales. Siguruhin regular ang maintenance ng makinarya at kagamitan. Sementuhin/aspaltuhan ang approach roads. Magdilig ng tubig sa paligid upang maiwasan ang al- ikabok sa panahon ng tag-araw.

Þ Ingay mula sa mga sasakyan at kagamitan

Ang mga kagamitang pang-konstruksiyon at makinarya ay dapat may mga silencer at maayos ang maintenance. Ang mga naaprubahang kagamitan lamang ang dapat gamitin para sa konstruksyon. Gawin sa gabi ang maingay na operasyong malapit sa paaralan, sa katapusan ng linggo kung malapit sa mga simbahan. Paghiwalayin ang maiingay na operasyon upang mabawasan ang kabuuang ingay, at kung posible, papag-ibahin ang daan ng trapiko sa panahon ng konstruksyon upang maiwasan ang akumulasyon ng ingay na lampas sa mga pamantayan. Kung maingay pa rin, maglagay ng pansamantalang harang sa ingay (noise barrier) sa mga sensitibong lugar o malapit sa pinagmumulan ng ingay. Pagbabawal ng pagbusina malapit sa mga sensitibong lugar at pagsusuot ng Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).

Þ Abala dala ng vibration

Wastong operasyon at maintenance ng lahat ng kagamitan na lilikha ng vibration. Iwasan ang magpaandar ng maingay na kagamitan at mga gawain na lilikha ng vibration sa gabi sa mga lugar ng tirahan. Sa araw naman, iwasan gawin malapit sa paaralan at iba pang mga institusyonal na lugar, at sa mga simbahan sa oras ng pagsamba.

Vibration

Acoustic ng kapaligiran

Kalidad ng hangin

Maglagay ng angkop na palatandaan pangtrapiko at babala

Þ Epekto sa lebel ng trapiko

Trapiko

Magtayo ng angkop at sapat na sanitary facility. Mahigpit na atasan ang kontratista at mga manggaga- wa nito na sundin ang wastong pagtatapon ng basura at tamang sanitasyon. Maghigpit sa pagpapanatili ng wastong paghawak at pagtatapon ng basura. Paglalagay ng buffer zones at containment barriers.

Þ Epekto mula sa deposito/latak ng lupa (sediment)

Hayop at halamang pantubig

Bawasan ang bilang ng mga puno na mahahawan sa pamamagitan ng minor geometric alignment. Pagsunod sa mga kondisyon ng DENR / LGU CLUP (Permit sa Pagputol ng Kahoy, ROW, PCA Permit). Maglagay ng pansamantalang bakod para sa mga hala- man na mananatili sa lugar. Itaguyod ang pagpapanumbalik ng nasira o nawasak na mga halaman kung saan posible (hal. pagtatanim ng puno sa tabi ng kalsada). Palitan ang mapuputol na puno base sa DENR MC No. 2012-02 (Sa bawat puno na mapuputol ay 100 katutu- bong puno ang itatanim bilang kapalit).

Þ Pagkaubos ng mga puno at halaman

Halamang panlupa

Iwasan ang pagputol ng mga puno hangga’t maari.

Þ Pagkagambala ng tirahan ng ibon

Hayop

Ang halaga ng kabayaran sa apektadong pribadong istruktura ay base sa “replacement cost” na tutukuyin ng Inde- pendent Property Appraiser (IPA) na

ikokontrata ng DPWH. Ano ang “cut-off date”? Kailan ba ang “cut-off date”?

Ang “cut-off date” ay ang araw na itinatalaga ng ahensya na magpapatupad ng proyekto. Sa proyektong ito, ang “cut-off date” ay ang petsa ng pagsisimula ng sensus o “survey” at imbentaryo ng mga maapektuhang ari-arian.

Kung magkakaroon ng problema o reklamo patungkol sa proyekto, kanino maaaring lumapit?

May hotline ang DPWH para sa hinaing ng mamamayan at ito ay sa pamamagitan ng Text 2920 o Tawag (02) – 165-02. Magbubuo din ng kinatawan para sa hinaing sa lebel ng lokal na pamahalaan at ng DPWH para sa proyekto upang mangasiwa sa usaping ito at dinggin ang mga ikokonsulta ng mga apektadong mamamayan. Ang mga pamamaraan para sa karaingan ay isasama sa pinal na Project Information Booklet (PIB) at Resettle- ment Plan (RP) na ibabahagi at ipaaalam sa mga apektadong mamamayan.

Kung mayroon mga tanong at nais ng paglilinaw tungkol sa proyekto, sino ang maaring kausapin?

Engr. Norifel Teddie G. Cadiang Engineer III UPMO- BMC, DPWH +632 5304 3925 +63919 0956778

Buod ng mga Potensyal na Epekto sa Kapaligiran

Page 36: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

Volume 5 Survey Permit and

Socio-Economic Survey Instrument

Page 37: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 38: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 39: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 40: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 41: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 42: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 43: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 44: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 45: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 46: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 47: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 48: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 49: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 50: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 51: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 52: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 53: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 54: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 55: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 56: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 57: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 58: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 59: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 60: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 61: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 62: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 63: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 64: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project
Page 65: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

1

INTERVIEWER ID: _______________

Metro Manila 3 Priority Bridges (MM3PB) Project SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY INSTRUMENT

Instructions: Please write responses legibly on the space provided. For questions with numbered options, please circle the number that corresponds to the respondent’s answer. For each question that doesn’t apply to respondent write “NA” beside the question. For applicable questions without responses, write “NR”. For other questions, please check the box that corresponds to the respondent’s answer.

Online Survey Telephone Interview Face-to-face Interview

FS DD Bridge 1 Bridge 2 Bridge 3 Main Structure Tag No: ______________________ PAP CONTROL NO: ________________ Associated Structure Tag/s (if any): ______________________________________________________________________

Non-Structure: Land Only Farm/Fish Pen

To be filled up by encoder: Title No.: ___________________ PIN: ___________ TD No. ____________ Lot ID No. __________ Location/Address of Affected Structure/Land/Farm/Fish Pen

Household Number, if any: ________________________

Unit/Bldg. No.: ______________ Street: ________________ Village/Subdivision: ______________

Barangay: ___________________________ City/Municipality:__________________________

A. PAP’s PROFILE

A1. Name: ____________________, _____________________, __________________, _________ (Family Name) (First Name) (Middle Name) (Suffix)

A2. Contact No.: Mobile: ________________________________ Landline: ____________________

A3. Sex: 1. Male 2. Female A4. Age ____ A5. Birthdate ____________(mm/dd/yyyy) A6. Civil Status: 1. Single 2. Married [answer A.11] 3. Separated 4. Widow/er 5. Live-in [answer A.11]

A7. Solo Parent with dependents1? 1. Yes 2. No A8. Ethnicity: 1. Tagalog 2. Ilocano 3. Bicolano 4. Cebuano 5. Aklanon 6. Moro 7. IP _____________________________ 8. Kapampangan 9. Ilonggo 10. Waray 11. Mixed 12. Others: ________________________ A9. Religion 1. Catholic 2. Protestant 3. Born Again 4. Islam 5. INC 6. Others (Specify):___________________ A.10 Type of Project Affected Persons (can be multiple responses)

1. Household, Business, Farm, Landowner (Residing) – [Use unified HH form] 2. Business, Farm, Landowner (Non-Residing) – [Use supplemental HH form] 3. Corporation, Institution, Cooperative, Association – [no HH form]

A.11 Name of Spouse: (Family Name, First Name, Middle Name) A.12 Birthdate:

1 Dependents are below 18 years old, above 65 years old, and PWD.

Page 66: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

2

B. RESPONDENT’S PROFILE (Do not fill this out if the PAP is also the respondent)

B1. Name: ____________________, _____________________, __________________, _________ (Family Name) (First Name) (Middle Name) (Suffix) B2. If representative, relationship of the respondent to the above PAP

1. Spouse 2. Child 3. Sibling 4. Parent 5. Worker/Employee 6. Caretaker 7. Other Relatives (specify: _______________) 8. Others (specify: ________________)

B3. Contact No.: Mobile: ________________________________ Landline: ____________________ B4. Sex: 1. Male 2. Female B5. Age: ________

C. STRUCTURE TYPE AND USE

C1. Type of Affected Structure 1. Single Detached 2.Duplex 3. Townhouse 4. Rowhouse 5. LRB (2-5 floors) 6. MRB (6-15 floors) 7. HRB (16 floors and up) 8. One level, non-residential building 9. Shanty

10. Other (specify:_____________) 11. No Affected Structure [SKIP to E] (LRB: Low Rise Building, MRB: Medium Rise Building, HRB: High Rise Building) C2. Use of Structure 1. Residential 2. Residential / Commercial 3.Residential/Institutional 4. Community Facility 5. Others (Specify______________________) C3. Material of Main Structure: 1. Concrete 2. Semi-concrete 3. Light material (wood, bamboo, nipa, palm, etc.) 4. Salvaged material (plastic, tin, cardboard, etc.) 5. Mixed Materials 6. Others (specify: _____) C4. Status/Condition of Use 1. Occupied 2. Abandoned/Vacant [SKIP to E] 3. Under Construction [SKIP to E] Is there any associated structure? 1. Yes 2. No [SKIP to D]

C5. Structure Tag No.*

C6. Type of Associated Structure

C7. Material of Associated Structure

C8. Used for Business Purposes?

1.

2.

3.

* Only list down structures with same structure owners

1. Fence with gate 2. Fence 3. Shed 4. Garage 5. Toilet 6. Storage 7.Water tank 8. Pig pen/animal cage 9. Swimming Pool 10. Playground 11. Others (specify: ___________)

1. Concrete 2. Semi-concrete 3. Light material (wood, bamboo, nipa, palm, etc.) 4. Salvaged material (plastic, tin, cardboard, etc.) 5. Mixed Materials 6. Others (specify: ___________)

1-Yes [ANSWER H] 2-No

D. STRUCTURE OWNERSHIP D1 Do you own the affected structure? 1. Yes 2. No [SKIP to D2] D1.1 If, yes, 1. Only owner 2. Co-owner D1.2 Structure Owner/Co-Owner Details: Name ____________________, ____________________, ___________________ Sex: 1. Male 2. Female (Last) (First) (Middle) Address: 1- Within Project Area, 2- Other Province Within Phils., 3- Abroad, 4- Unknown, 5- NA (Deceased) Contact No.______________________________________________________ D1.3 Structure Owner/Co-Owner Details (if more than one): Name ____________________, ____________________, ___________________ Sex: 1. Male 2. Female (Last) (First) (Middle) Address: 1- Within Project Area, 2- Other Province Within Phils., 3- Abroad, 4- Unknown, 5- NA (Deceased) Contact No.______________________________________________________ D1.4 How did you acquire the structure? 1. Purchase 2. Inherited/Gratuitous Act 3. Self-Built 4. Relocated 5.Others (specify: _____________________________________________________________)

D1.5 Do you rent out the structure? 1. Yes 2. No[SKIP to D1.8]

Page 67: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

3

D1.6 Number of renters/tenants, if any ): _______

Name (Last, First, Middle) of renters/tenants Contact No.

1.

2.

D1.7 How much is the average rent per month: Php ______________

D1.8 Is this structure used for business?

1. Yes [ANSWER Section H] 2. No [SKIP to Section E]

D1.9 Do you pay taxes for the structure? 1. Yes 2. No [SKIP to Section E]

D1.10 If Yes, how much tax (RPT) did you pay last year? Php ________________

For Non structure owner only (D2 - D3.1)

D2. If not the owner, what type of arrangement do you have with structure owner? 1. Tenant/Renter/Lessee [ANSWER D2.1 – D3.1] 2. Rent free occupant 3. Caretaker 4. Sharer [ANSWER D2.1] 5. Occupant without owner’s permission

D2.1 If Renter/Sharer, how much is your rent/share per month? Php_________________ D2.2 What is the size of your rented space? ________________ square meter D3. What proof do you have to show arrangement with owner? 1. Written contract 2. Verbal arrangement 3. None D3.1 If written contract, what are the terms? 1. Annual contract 2. Others (Specify) ___________

E. LAND OWNERSHIP E1. Do you own the land where this structure/farm/fishpond is built/located? 1. Yes 2. No [SKIP to E3] E1.2. If Yes, what is the tenure status of the parcel 1. Fully owned 2. Co-owned E1.3 Registered Owner: 1. Husband only 2. Wife only 3. Both husband & wife 4. Female HH Head 5. Male HH Head 6. Female HH member 7. Male HH member 8. Deceased HH member 9. Non-relative E2. Do you have a valid/ legal document to prove ownership of this land?

1. Yes 2. No [SKIP to E2.3] E2.1 If yes, what is your proof of Ownership? (Can be multiple responses)

1. 1. Title (OCT/TCT/CLT/CLOA/CADT/CALT) 2. Real Property Tax 3. Deed of Sale 4. Mortgage 5. Contract 6. Lease Purchase Agreement 7. Certificate of Lot Award/Occupancy

2. 8. Others (Specify) ______________ 9. None

3. E2.2 If title, what is the title number? ___________________ E2.3 How did you acquire the land? 1. Purchased 2. Inherited 3. Given 4. Government Program 5. Others (specify: ______________) E2.4 Do you pay the real estate tax for the land? 1. Yes 2. No [SKIP to E2.6]

E2.5 If yes, how much per year? Php ___________

E2.6 Do you have tenant/lessees? 1. Yes 2. No [SKIP to E2.7]

E2.6.1 If yes, please specify the name of tenant/lessees:

Name (Last, First, Middle) Contact No.

1.

2.

E2.6.2 How much is the rent/share? (ask mode of payment, amount of rent) PhP____________

1. Monthly 2. Quarterly 3. Bi-Annual 4. Annually 5. By contract/tranche E2.7 Is this lot currently on loan or used as mortgage to a bank or private entity? 1. Yes 2. No

Page 68: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

4

F. TYPE AND USE OF AFFECTED LAND F1. Type of Land: 1. Private 2. Public 3. Right of Way (ROW) 4. Ancestral Domain F1.1 Type of Ownership: 1. Individual 2. Multiple Owner 3. Corporation 4. Community Ownership (CMP, HOA, Coop) 5. Government F2. Current Actual Use of Land (Can be multiple responses) 1. Residential [ANSWER Section G] 2. Industrial [ANSWER Section H] 3.Commercial [ANSWER Section H] 4. Institutional [ANSWER Section H] 5. Agriculture [ANSWER Section I] 6. Aquaculture [ANSWER Section I] 7. Vacant/Idle Land [SKIP to J] 8. Others (specify:_____________)

For Non landowner only (E3 – E3.1.2) E3. If not the landowner, what is your arrangement with the owner?

1. 1. Renting/Leasing [ANSWER E3.1 – E3.3.1] 2. Occupied with owner’s permission 3. Acquired Right 4. Occupied without owner’s permission 5. Rent-free 6. Tenant 7. Caretaker 8. Others (Specify) ________________ E3.1 If Renter/Lessee, how much is your rent/lease per month? Php_________________ E3.2 What is the size of your rented area? ________________ square meter E3.3 What proof do you have to show arrangement with landowner owner? 1. Written contract 2. Verbal arrangement E3.3.1 If written contract, what are the terms? 1. Annual contract 2. Others (Specify) ___________

Page 69: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

5

G. HOUSEHOLD CENSUS G1. HOUSEHOLD INFORMATION G1.1 Composition of Household/Family Members

G1.1.1 Number of Household Members ______________________

No. G1.1.2 Name

G1.1.3

Sex

G1.1.4

Age

G1.1.5

Ethnicity

G1.1.6

Relationship to

Household Head

G1.1.7

Highest Educational

Attainment

G1.1.8

If ongoing

education, location

of School?

Last Name

First Name

Middle Name

1 HH

2 Spouse

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

1.Male 2.Female

1. Tagalog 2. IIocano 3. Bicolano 4.Cebuano 5. Aklanon 6. Moro 7. IP, Specify 8. Kapampangan 9. Ilonggo 10. Waray 11. Mixed 12.Other , Specify

1.Head of family 2.Spouse 3.Son/daughter 4.Father/mother 5.Sister/brother 6.Grandchildren 7.Grandparents 8.Other relative 9.Non-relative, specify

1.Pre-school 2.Elem. Level (Grade 1-6) 3. Elementary Graduate 4. High School Level (Grade 7-12) 5. High School Graduate 6. Vocational/Technical 7.College Level 8. College Graduate 9.Advanced College/ university Degree 10.None 11. SPED, specify level

1.Within neighborhood or barangay 2.Near barangay 3.Other city/ municipality 4.Overseas 5.Others, please specify 6. Not Applicable

(If the space is not enough, make a list on a separate paper.)

Page 70: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

6

G1. HOUSEHOLD INFORMATION (Continuation… Please list all household members in the same order in the following table.)

No. Name (For Working HH Member Only) G1.3.1 Main Source

of Income

G1.3.2 Income

(Php/Month)

G1.3.3 Location

G1.3.4 Basis of Income

Payment

G1.3.5 If land-based,

what type?

G1.3.6 If wage-based,

what is the status of

employment?

G1.3.7 If wage-

based what type? (please specify)

G1.3.8 If self-

employed, what type of occupation?

Last Name First Name Middle Name

1 HH

2 Spouse

3

4

5

6

7

8

G1.3.9 Combined primary family income PHP __________ * Others: Wage-Based

10. Production/Factory Workers, 11. Aviation, 12. Arts, 13. Business

(worker receiving salary), 14. Law Enforcement, 15. Media,

16. Medical, 17. Service Industry, 18. Teaching, 19. Technology,

20. Animal Career, 21. Military Service, 22. Clergy Profession,

23. Sea-based Careers, 24. OFW, 25. Engineering Professionals

26. Others, specify: ________________________

** Others: Self-employed

13. Online selling 14. Buy and sell/trading

15. Pisonet 16. Shoemaking, 17. Tattoo/painting

18. Re-seller (i.e. cosmetic products) 19. Billiards

20. Small scale printing (tarpaulin, Xerox) 21. Piggery/poultry

22. Others, specify: ________________________

1- Land–Based, 2- Wage-Based, 3- Enterprise/ Business 4- Self-employed 5- Remittance-Based/Pension /Donation 6-Others, specify

1.Own residence 2. Outside residence but within PROW 3.Within neighborhood or barangay 4.Near barangay 5.Other city /municipality 6.Overseas 7.No definite area 8.Others, please specify For business and land based located within own residence or PROW, interview using BS/AF Form

1.Daily 2.Weekly 3.Monthly 4.Bi-Monthly 5.Pakyaw or Piecemeal 6.Commission 7.Irregular, Please specify

1.Crop Production 2. Fish Production 3. Livestock/poultry production 4. Mix 5.Others please specify

1.Permanent/Regular 2.Contractual/Project Based 3. Temporary/ Casual 4. Seasonal/ Intermittent 5.Others, please specify

1.Office Work 2.Public Official 3.Sales/Vendor 4.Driver 5.Househelp 6. Construction Worker 7.Industry Worker 8. Farm work 9. Fishing activity *Others, please see choices (left)

1. Peddling 3. Food processing/ preparation 4. Hair/Nails/Make-up 5. Transport (e.g. tricycle, pedicab) 6. Small scale production (tailoring, crafts making, weaving) 7. House/Room Rental 8. Construction 9.Vulcanizing 10. Repair services (shoe, umbrella) 11. Scavenging 12. Laundry/ cleaning services ** Others, please see choices

G1. HOUSEHOLD INFORMATION (Continuation… Please list all household members in the same order in the following table.)

Page 71: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

7

No. Name (For Working HH Member Only) G1.4.1 Secondary Source of Income

G1.4.2 Income

(Php/Month)

G1.4.3 Location

G1.4.4 Basis of Income

Payment

G1.4.5 If land-based,

what type?

G1.4.6 If wage-based,

what is the status of

employment?

G1.4.7 If wage-based

what type? (please specify)

G1.4.8 If self-employed,

what type of occupation?

Last Name First Name Middle Name

1 HH

2 Spouse

3

4

5

6

7

8

G2.4.9 Combined secondary family income PHP ________ G1.4.10 No. of members contributing ___ G1.4.11 Total Combined HH Monthly Income

PHP ________________ (Sum of G1.3.9 & G1.4.9)

* Others: Wage-Based

10. Production/Factory Workers, 11. Aviation, 12. Arts, 13. Business

(worker receiving salary), 14. Law Enforcement, 15. Media,

16. Medical, 17. Service Industry, 18. Teaching, 19. Technology,

20. Animal Career, 21. Military Service, 22. Clergy Profession,

23. Sea-based Careers, 24. OFW, 25. Engineering Professionals

26. Others, specify: ________________________

** Others: Enterprise-Based

13. Online selling 14. Buy and sell/trading

15. Pisonet 16. Shoemaking, 17. Tattoo/painting

18. Re-seller (i.e. cosmetic products) 19. Billiards

20. Printing and Reproduction (tarpaulin, Xerox), 21. Piggery/poultry

22. Others, specify: ________________________

1- Land–Based, 2- Wage-Based, 3- Enterprise/ Business 4- Self-employed 5- Remittance-Based/Pension /Donation 6-Others, specify

1.Own residence 2. Outside residence but within PROW 3.Within neighborhood or barangay 4.Near barangay 5.Other city /municipality 6.Overseas 7.No definite area 8.Others, please specify

1.Daily 2.Weekly 3.Monthly 4.Bi-Monthly 5.Pakyaw or Piecemeal 6.Commission 7.Irregular, please specify

1. Crop Production 2. Fish Production 3. Livestock/poultry production 4. Mix 4.Others please specify

1.Permanent/Regular 2.Contractual/Project Based 3. Temporary/ Casual 4. Seasonal/ Intermittent 5.Others, please specify

1.Office Work 2.Public Official 3.Sales 4.Driver 5.Househelp 6. Construction Worker 7.Industry Worker 8. Farm work 9. Fishing activity *Others, please see choices (left)

1. Peddling 3. Food processing/ preparation 4. Hair/Nails/Make-up 5. Transport (e.g. tricycle, pedicab) 6. Small scale production (tailoring, crafts making, weaving) 7. House/Room Rental 8. Construction 9.Vulcanizing 10. Repair services (shoe, umbrella) 11. Scavenging 12. Laundry/ cleaning services ** Others, please see choices

Page 72: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

8

G1. HOUSEHOLD INFORMATION (Continuation… Please list all household members in the same order in the following table.) G1.5 Skills, Membership in Organizations and Vulnerability

No. Name G1.5.1

Current

Skills

G1.5.2

Preferred Skills

Training

G1.5.3

Location of

Organization

G1.5.4

Vulnerability

G1.5.5

Who takes care

of vulnerable

HH member?

Last Name First Name Middle Name

1 HH

2 Spouse

3

4

5

6

7

8

9 1- Carpentry,

2-Driving, 3- Mechanic, 4-Practical Electricity, 5-Welding, 6-Industrial Painting, 7-Computer Technician 8-Dressmaking/ Tailoring 9- Food Processing 10-Handicrafts Making 11-Hair Dressing/ Cosmetology 12. Cooking 13- Others, please specify 14-None

1- Carpentry, 2-Driving, 3- Mechanic, 4-Practical Electricity, 5-Welding, 6-Industrial Painting, 7-Computer Technician 8-Dressmaking/ Tailoring 9- Food Processing 10-Handicrafts Making 11-Hair Dressing/ Cosmetology 12. Cooking 13- Others, please specify 14-None

1.Homeowners Association 2.Cooperative 3.Women’s Group 4. Savings Group 5. Religious Organization 6. Senior Citizen 7. Others, please specify 8. None

1.Baby/Toddler 2.Pregnant 3.Elderly 4.Mental Disorder 5.Needs Assistance Walking/Cannot Walk 6.Seriously Ill 7.Blind 8.Mute/Deaf 9.Others please specify 10. None

1- Other family/household member or relatives living independently 2- Day Care Center 3- Leaving the children/vulnerable in the care of neighbors 4- Leaving the children/vulnerable un-attended 5- Other facilities, please specify 6. None 7- Not Applicable

Page 73: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

9

G2. BASIC HOUSEHOLD INFORMATION Applicable only to PAPs with household inside the project area

G3. MONTHLY EXPENDITURE OF HOUSEHOLD (PHP)

G3.1 Expense Items G3.2

Estimated Cost

(Php/Month) G3.3 Remarks

1. Rent (land)- E3.1 2.Rent (house/room)- D2.1 3. Housing amortization (rent to own) 4. Car/motorcycle amortization 5. Savings

If in bank, under whose name? ________________________ Sex: 1. Male 2. Female 3. Both

6.Tax (Land/Structure)- D1.10, E2.4, 7.Food /Groceries 8.Non-Food Items/ Groceries 9. Light (Electricity) 10. Water 11. Education 12. Communication (landline/mobile phone) 13. Internet Connection 14. Cable Connection 15.Transportation (Fare/Gas) 16. Recreation (Travel, Eat Out, etc.) 17.Health (Check-up, Maintenance Medicine) 18. Cooking (LPG, Gas, Charcoal) 19. Loan Payment/Amortization (Appliances, Furniture, Personal/Bank Debt, etc.) 20. Financial Support 21. Salary (House help, Driver, Employee, etc) 22.Others (Specify)

TOTAL ( PHP ) * *Note: G3.2 should not be higher than G.2.4.11

G2.1 Affected Household? 1. Yes 2. No [SKIP TO G3] G2.2 Type of Residence 1. Primary Residence If primary, do you have a secondary residence? � Yes � No 2. Secondary Residence If secondary, where is your primary residence located? (Specify) ___________________________

G2.3 Length of stay on current location 1. 0-6 months 2. 7-11 months 3. 1-2 years 4. 3-5 years 5. 6-10 years

6. 11-15 years 7. 16-20 years 8. More than 20 years 9. Since birth [SKIP TO G2.5] G2.4 Place of Residence prior to current location

1. Same Barangay 2. In City/Municipality 3. Metro Manila (City: _______________________) 4. Other City/Municipality (Specify ______________) 5. Other province (Specify __________) G2.5 Primary reason for establishing residence on current location (single response only)

1. Proximity to livelihood 2. Rent free / Affordable rental fee 3. Family ties 4. Near school 5. Got married 6. Other (Specify) _____________________

G2.6 Social Safety Net and Financial Support Services (Can be multiple responses) 1. Pag-ibig fund– HDMF 2. GSIS 3. SSS 4. Cooperative (specify name) _________________

5. Phil Health 6. Micro-Finance 7. 4Ps 8. Others (Specify) _________________ 9. None (HDMF: Home Dev’t Mutual Fund, GSIS: Government Service Insurance System, SSS: Social Security System, 4Ps:Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program)

Page 74: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

10

G4. HOUSEHOLD GOODS OWNED

G4.1 Item G4.2 Quantity G4.3 Sex of

Owners (1.Male, 2.Female,

3. Both)

G4.4 Estimated Total Value

(Php) G4.2.1 No. of Functioning

G.4.2.2. No. of Non-

Functioning G4.2.3.Total

No.

1.House (Yes in D1)

2. Car

3.Tricycle/bicycle

4.Motorcycle/E-bike

5. Landline telephone

6. Cell phone

7. Computer

8. TV set/Videoke

9. VCD/DVD

10. Stereo Component

11.Refrigerator/Freezer

12.Washing machine/ Dryer

13.Oven/Range

14.Microwave

15. Bed

16.Sala Set

17.Dining Set

18. Electric Fan

19. Aircon

20. Others, specify

G5. DECISION MAKING: HOUSEHOLD FINANCE G5 In your family/household, who decides for the following? (Single Response Only) G5.1 Whether to let children continue school, or send to higher education

1. Husband only 2. Wife only 3. Both husband & wife 4. Household Head 5. Others (Specify) ____________ 6. Not Applicable: no student in the household

G5.2 How income of household/family member is managed for household expenses 1. Both husband and wife pool their income together for household expenses. 2. Husband collects income from wife and other members for household expenses. 3. Husband gives his income to wife and wife manages the fund for household expenses. 4. Other female household member collects income from income earning members and manages fund. 5. Other male household member collects income from income earning members and manages fund. 6. Household Head 7. Others: ___________________________

G5.3 In whose name is any of your property registered? (D1.2, E1.3) 1. Husband only 2. Wife only 3. Both husband & wife 4. Female HH Head 5. Male HH Head 6. Female HH member 7. Male HH member 8. Others (Specify) __________________ 9. Not Applicable: no property

G6. RESPONSIBILITY ON DOMESTIC CHORES G6 In your family/household, who does the following? G6.1 Supervising and giving discipline to child(ren) (Single Response Only)

1. Husband only 2. Wife only 3. Both husband & wife 4. Female HH Head 5. Male HH Head 6. Female HH member 7. Male HH member 8. Others (Specify) ______________ 9. Not Applicable: no child(ren) in the household

G6.2 Taking care of vulnerable member of the household/family (Single Response Only) 1. Husband only 2. Wife only 3. Both husband & wife 4. Female HH Head 5. Male HH Head 6. Female HH member 7. Male HH member 8. Others (Specify) __________________

Page 75: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

11

9. Not Applicable: no vulnerable member G6.3 Doing household chores-- cleaning and tidying the house and improvement, preparing meals, disposal of garbage, etc. (Single Response Only) 1. Husband only 2. Wife only 3. Both husband & wife 4. Female HH Head 5. Male HH Head

6. Female HH member 7. Male HH member 8. All HH members 9. Others (Specify) ____________

G7. LIVING CONDITION G7 Access to Utilities G7.1 Primary Access to Electricity (single response only)

1. Own electric meter for power connection 2. Shared connection 3. Illegal Connection 4. No connection (gas/kerosene, rechargeable battery, LPG, oil) 5. Others (Specify) ______

G7.2 Primary Access to Water (single response only) 1. Piped/metered connection 2. Shared with neighbor (community faucet) 3. Deep well 4. Shallow well 5. Buy from water vendors 6. Others (Specify) _____________________________ G7.3 Primary Access to Sanitation (single response only)

1. Own water sealed toilets (inside house) 2. Open pit 3. Communal/barangay toilet 4. No toilet 5. Others (Specify)_____________

G7.4 Main Fuel Used for Cooking (single response only) 1. Gas (LPG) 2. Kerosene 3. Charcoal 4. Wood 5. Electricity 6. None 7. Other (Specify) ______

G8. HEALTH CONDITIONS (Can be multiple responses)

G8.1 Morbidity: Health problems experienced in your household/family for the past one year 1. HIV/AIDS 4. Typhoid fever 7. Pneumonia/Tuberculosis 10. Heart problems 13. None

2. Malaria 5. Diarrhea 8. Flu 11. Hypertension 14. Liver Failure

3. Dengue 6. Skin diseases 9. Cancer 12. Diabetes 15. COVID-related

G8.2 Mortality: Observed causes of death in your community 1. HIV/AIDS 4. Typhoid fever 7. Pneumonia/Tuberculosis 10. Heart problems 13. None

2. Malaria 5. Diarrhea 8. Flu 11. Hypertension 14. Liver Failure

3. Dengue 6. Skin diseases 9. Cancer 12. Diabetes 15. COVID-related

G9. COMMUNITY ISSUES (Can be multiple responses) G9.1 What do you think are the persistent problems in your community?

1. Health 4. Safety/Security 7. Garbage collection 2. Water/Sanitation 5. Illegal Drugs 8. Others (Specify) ___________________ 3. Flooding 6. Job/Employment 9. None

G10. PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE ON RELOCATION G10.1 Have you ever been displaced due to a relocation, demolition or government infrastructure project? 1. Yes 2. No G10.2 Have you availed of a government housing program before? 1.Yes 2. No [SKIP to G10.5] G10.3 What kind of housing project was it? 1. NHA relocation site 2. SHFC CMP 3. Pag-IBIG Housing 4. LGU Housing

5. DSWD 6. Other government agency initiative 7. Others (Specify) ___________ (NHA: National Housing Authority, SHFC CMP: Socialized Housing Finance Corporation , Community Mortgage Program, Pag-IBIG: Pagtutulugan sa Kinabukasan: Ikaw,

Bangko, Industriya, Gobyerno, LGU: Local Government Unit, DSWD: Department of Social Welfare and Development) G10.4 What did you do in the awarded housing unit/lot? 1. Kept/Maintained 2. Transferred to children/relatives 3. Abandoned 4. Rented out 5. Sold/Mortgaged 6. Others (specify)___________ G10.5 Did you avail of Balik Probinsya Program? 1. Yes 2. No G10.6 If previously relocated and have gone back to the area, what made you come back? (Multiple Responses) 1. No work/livelihood opportunities 2. No access to public transportation 3. No access to/provision of utilities (light & water) 4. No available healthcare facilities 5. No near educational facilities 6. Others (Specify) ________________ G10.7 If you will be displaced from your current home, which relocation assistance do you prefer? 1. Assistance to avail socialized housing/economic housing 2. Assistance to avail Balik Probinsya 3. Assistance to find alternative site to rebuild our home G10.8 If you will avail socialized housing, where do you prefer to resettle? (Single Response Only)

Page 76: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

12

1 Same barangay 4. Within Metro Manila 2. Within same City/Municipality 5. City/municipality in other province/region 3. City/Municipality within same province

G10. 9 Which housing agency/institution would you prefer? 1. NHA 2. SHFC (CMP) 3. LGU 4. Pag-IBIG 6. NGO (i.e. Gawad Kalinga/Habitat) G10.10 What type of structure would you prefer? 1. Single detached 2. Duplex 3. Row House 4. LRB 5. MRB 6. Lot only 7. None of the choices G10.8 What would be your considerations for the relocation site? (choose one)

1. Near work/livelihood opportunities 2. Near schools 3. Near market/malls 4. Near Church 5. Near recreational activities 6. Access to public transportation 7. Others (Specify) _______

G10.9. Do you own land in your province or anywhere in the country? 1. Yes 2. No G10.9.1 If Yes, where? (Specify) _________________________________________________

G10.10 Will you agree to be relocated in high density housing? 1. Yes 2. No

G10.11 How much are you willing to pay for a housing unit per month (Php)? 1. Above Php 5,000 2. Php 5,000 3. Php 4,000 4. Php 3,000 5. Php 2,000 6. Php 1,500 7. Php 1000 8. Below Php 1,000 7. Php 500 8. Below Php 500

H. CENSUS OF BUSINESS/INSTITUTION Applicable for PAP with non-dwelling structure inside the project area H1. PROFILE OF BUSINESS/INSTITUTION

H1 Do you own/operate a business/institution in the affected area? 1. Yes 2. No [SKIP to I] H1.1 Business/ Institution Name: ____________________________________________________________

H1.2 Type of Business/Institution

1. Trading/Retailing (General Merchandise,

Paint Shop/Hardware,

Fruit/Food Stand)

2. Manufacturing 3. Restaurant/Fast

Food/Eatery

4. Personal Services (Barber Shop, Laundry

Shop, Pump Service, etc)

5. Transport 6. Home/Small-scale industry

7. Service Contracting [Answer H1.5]

8. House/Room Rental 9. Commercial Space/Unit Rental

10. Barangay/Office/Organization 11. Bank/Church/School/Hospital

12. Resort 13. Machining and Fabrication

14. Printing, Repro, Art Sign 15. Cockpit ring 16. Farming

17. Aquaculture 18. Poultry/Livestock Raising 19. Warehouse

20. Others (Specify) _____________ H1.3 Type of Business/Institution Ownership 1. Single proprietorship 2. Partnership 3. Corporation 4. Cooperative 5. Association 6. Government (Non-Corp)

7. Government Owned and Controlled Corporation (GOCC) 8. Others (Specify) ________________

H1.4 How much is your capital/business asset? 1. < 3M 2. > 3M, <15M 3. >15M, <100M 4. Not Applicable [SKIP to H2] H1.5 Type of Service: 1. Information Technology 2. Education/Training Services 3. Consulting 4. Transportation Services 5. Events 6. Media 7. Financial Services 8. Medicine 8. Professional Services 10. Wellness 11. Production/manufacturing 11. Others __________ H1.6 Length of Business/ Institution in Operation: ________ (No. of years)

H1.7 Start of operation ______ (Specify year) H1.8 Business License/Registration/Permit (Multiple Response)

1. Registered with DTI 2. Registered with SEC 3. Registered with BIR 4. Barangay Business Permit 5. Mayor’s Permit/LGU Permit 6. Not registered in any

H1.9 Monthly Business Income H1.9.1 Ave. Gross Monthly Income: PhP _______ H1.9.2 Ave. Net Monthly Income: PhP ________

Page 77: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

13

H2. EMPLOYEE INFORMATION H2.1 Who help you in your business operation/production? 1. Family Members 2. Relatives 3. Non-relatives 4. Mix of 1, 2 & 3 5. None [Skip to I] H2.2 Do you have paid employees? 1. Yes 2. No [Skip to I] H2.3 How many employees do you have? 1. 1-9 2. 10-99 3. 100-199 4. 200 and up

H2.3.1 Total Number of Employees

(fill out what’s applicable)

H2.3.2 No of Employees by Sex H2.3.3 Average

Monthly Salary *H2.3.4 Skills M F

Management/Executive level Technical Staff/Skilled workers Support Staff/Unskilled workers

Total *1. Construction related 2. Food Preparation/Technology 3. Hotel/Restaurant related 4. Automotive related 5. Electronic/Electrical related 6. Computer related 7. Health related 8. Clerical related 9. Sales related 10. Personal Services related 11. Design/Arts related 12. Dressmaking related 13. Agriculture related 14. Aquaculture Related 15. Business/Finance related

H3 SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY FOR BUSINESS H3.1 Name of HH Head: , ,

(Family Name) (First Name) (MI)

H3.2 Place of Residence: Unit/Bldg. No.: ______________ Street: _______________________________________________

Village/Subdivision: _______________________________________________________________

Barangay _______________________________ City/Municipality: _________________________

H3.3 Contact No.: Mobile: Landline:

H3.4 Birth Date:_________________________. (dd/mm/yyyy) H3.5 Civil Status

1. Single 2. Married 3. Separated

4. Widow/er 5. Live-in 6. Others (Specify) __________________________

Page 78: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

14

H4. Household Information

H4.1 Composition of Household/Family Members

No. Last Name First Name Middle Name H4.1.2 Sex

H4.1.3 Age

H4.1.4 Relationship to

HH Head

H4.1.5 Highest

Educational Attainment

H4.1.6 Vulnerability

1 HH Head

2 Spouse

3

4 5

6 7

8

9 10

1.Male 2.Female

1. 6 yo or less 2.7-12yo 3.13-16yo 4.17-20yo 5. 21-40yo 6.41-60yo 7.61-above

1.Head of family 2.Spouse 3.Son/daughter 4.Father/mother 5.Sister/brother 6.Grandchildren 7.Grandparents 8.Other

1 .Pre-school 2.Elementary Level 3. Elementary Graduate 4. High School Level 5. High School Graduate 6.Vocational/Technical 7.College Level 8. College Graduate 9. Advanced College/ university Degree 10.None

1.Income below poverty threshold 2.Elderly 3.Mental Disorder 4.Seriously Ill 5. Single Parent NCR: APC 2018 P28,862 Region IV-A: APC 2018 P23,688

H4.1.1 Number of Household Members

Page 79: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

15

H4. Household Livelihood Information

H4.1 Combined HH Monthly Income (PhP) (Include all those contributing to the Household income)

No. H4.1Name H4.1.1 Primary Source of

Income

H4.1.2 From Primary Income

(Php/Month)

H4.1.3 Secondary Source of

Income

H4.1.4 From Secondary Income

(Php/Month)

1 Head

2 Spouse

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 1. Land-based,

2. Wage-based, 3. Enterprise-based, 4. Remittance-based 5. No Occupation 6. Others, Specify

1. Land-based, 2. Wage-based, 3. Enterprise-based, 4. Remittance-based 5. No Occupation 6. Others, Specify

H4.1.5 No. of members contributing

H4.1.6 Total Combined HH Monthly Income Php

Page 80: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

16

H4.2. Monthly Expenditure of Household (PhP)

H4.2.1 Expense Items H4.2.2 Estimated Cost (PhP/Month)

1. Rent (land) 2. Rent (house/room) 3. Savings 4. Tax 5. Food (Groceries) 6. Light 7. Water 8. Education 9. Communication (landline/mobile phone, internet, cable etc.) 10.Transportation 11.Recreation 12.Health 13.Others (Specify)

TOTAL ( Php )

H4.3. Household Assets Owned

H4.3.1 Item H4.3.2 Own? H4.3.1 Item H4.3.2 Own? 1.House 10. Stereo Component 2. Car 11.Refrigerator 3.Tricycle 12.Washing machine 4.Motorcycle 13. Oven/Range 5. Landline telephone 14.Microwave 6. Cell phone 15. Bed 7. Computer 16.Sala Set 8. TV set 17.Dining Set 9.VCR/VCD 18. Others, (Specify) 1 - YES

2 - NO 1 - YES

2 - NO

H5. LIVELIHOOD REHABILITATION MEASURES (may include more than one response) H5.1 In case you lose your job or in the event of business closure due to the implementation of the

project, what type of livelihood assistance would you need?

1. Job/employment within the current sector 4. Replacement land/business structure 2. Any job/employment 5. Vocational/Skills Training 3. Financial assistance in finding new employment 6. Financial Assistance 7. Others (Specify): _______________________ H5.2 Where is your preferred location for employment or new business? 1. Current barangay 2. Any barangay within current city 3. Any city within same province 4. Near relocation site 5. Other province 6. Abroad/Outside the country

H5.3 What is/are your current skills/expertise? 1. Construction related 2. Food Preparation/Technology 3. Hotel/Restaurant related 4. Automotive related 5. Electronic/Electrical related 6. Computer related 7. Health related 8. Clerical related 9. Sales related

Page 81: 52181-001: Metro Manila Bridges Project

17

10. Personal Services related 11. Design/Arts related 12. Dressmaking related 13. Agriculture related 14. Aquaculture Related 15. Business/Finance related H5.4 What is/are your preferred vocational/skills training? 1. Construction related 2. Food Preparation/Technology 3. Hotel/Restaurant related 4. Automotive related 5. Electronic/Electrical related 6. Computer related 7. Health related 8. Clerical related 9. Sales related 10. Personal Services related 11. Design/Arts related 12. Dressmaking related 13. Agriculture related 14. Aquaculture Related 15. Business/Finance related

I. PROJECT AWARENESS I1. Have you heard about the NSCR-Ex project? 1. Yes 2. No

I2. What benefits do you think can be derived from this project? (Can be multiple responses)

1. Will reduce the traffic jam 2. Will improve comfort and convenience to passengers and car owners 3. project will improve access to social amenities and facilities such as schools, hotels,

recreational facilities, and hospitals 4. will improve access to working place/office 5. value of commercial and residential properties will increase 6. will open up opportunities for work and business 7. others (Specify): __________________

I3. What are your overall issues and concerns about the project? (Can be multiple responses)

1. My house will be demolished/We will be relocated to another area. 2. My fishing activity will be stopped 3. Fishing environment in the area will be disturbed because of bridge construction activities 4. Number of fish species will significantly decrease 5. My business/livelihood will be affected. 6. I will lose income 7. I will lose access to the river 8. Living environment in the area will get worse because of noise and vibration. 9. Flooding will worsen in our community 10. Value of commercial and residential properties will decrease. 11. Others (Specify) ____________________________________________________________

I4. Do you support the proposed project?

1. Yes

2. No (If no, why___________________________________________________________________)

I5. What are your recommendations to address your issues and concerns? 1. Redesign the Project 2. Provision of Compensation 3. Financial Assistance 4. Livelihood Restoration 6. Relocation House/Structure 7. Others:______________________

DATA PRIVACY CONSENT I understand that the information above is collected for the purpose of the North South Commuter Railway Extension (NSCR-Ex) project and I express my consent for the EcosysCorp, Inc. and its clients to collect, record, organize, store, retrieve, consult, use, consolidate, block, erase or destroy my personal data as part of my information. I also agree that my personal data and all privileged information herein shall be processed only in accordance with the provisions set forth in Chapter 3 of Republic Act No. 10173 of the Philippines, Data Privacy Act of 2012 and its corresponding Implementing Rules and Regulations, provided further that all information herein shall be protected and shall not be used for other purposes aside from the above project without my knowledge and consent.

Name Signature Date

Respondent

Interviewer/Agent

Field Supervisor

QC Editor