536_C.101.I_V.8-DOSC 01.06.2019 [536] page 1 of 3

Copyright by ‘TELES Patent Rights International’, 2004-2019, Berlin.

The Congressional Committee’s PE Initiative Confirms the USPTO’s 2019 PE-Guideline (almost)

─ i.e., the Latter’s Vastly Agreed § 101 Meaning Requires a Further Detail for being PE[526] ─

Sigram Schindler

TU Berlin & TELES Patent Rights International GmbH

www.fstp-expert-system.com

The recent § 101 modification proposed by the Congressional 101 Initiative [527] evidently notionally strives (esp.

by its "other legislative provisions", see ANNEX I) towards the by it meant objective ─ being a wording of § 101

that would consolidate the USPTO’s vastly agreed but still slightly deficient meaning of ‘Patent-Eligibility, PE’1.a).

This objective is achieved by AIb) and by inserting the below highlighted adjective into this proposal (see ANNEX I & II).

Section 101: (a) “Whoever invents or discovers any useful non- or limited-preemptivec) process, machine, …

of this title”d) ─ thus settling the 101-problem, but not the 100- &112-based BIOETCI-problemse).

ANNEX I: The 35 USC/SPL Modifications Proposed by the Congressional Committee on 22.05.2019.

The proposed modifications of §§ 100, 101, and 112 by the Congressional Committee is[534]:

Section 100: e) (k) The term "useful" means any invention or discovery that provides specific and practical utility in any field of technology through human intervention.

Section 101: (a) Whoever invents or discovers any useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefore, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title.

(b) Eligibility under this section shall be determined only while considering the claimed invention as a whole, without discounting or disregarding any claim limitation.

Section 112: e) (f) Functional Claim Elements — An element in a claim expressed as a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof.

In addition, the proposal is accompanied by "other legislative provisions" to the effect that:

1.) The provisions of section 101 shall be construed in favor of eligibility.

2.) No implicit or other judicially created exceptions to subject matter eligibility, including "abstract ideas," "laws of nature," or "natural phenomena," shall be used to determine patent eligibility under section 101, and all cases establishing or interpreting those exceptions to eligibility are hereby abrogated.

3.) The eligibility of a claimed invention under section 101 shall be determined without regard to: the manner in which the claimed invention was made; whether individual limitations of a claim are well known, conventional or routine; the state of the art at the time of the invention; or any other considerations relating to sections 102, 103, or 112 of this title.

1 .a as outlined by the USPTO’s 2019 Guideline, being reported by Andrei Iancu to this Committee[530p.3]. For its deficiency see[526].

For all other acronyms & abbreviations used in this mail see[e.g 503] in the below Ref-List of the FSTP-Project.

.b For ETCIs’ SPL-satisfying tests, their “AI”[526ftn1.b)] is defined to be their deterministic SPL semantics[480ftn2.c)], i.e. describable by analytical modelling (e.g. by the FSTP-Test, i.e. computer implemented) ─ and hence for no ETCI needing empiric ML!!!

.c The adjective ‘non- or limited-preemptive’ of an invention I1 means: There is ●no invention I2 or ●only a finite number of I2s such that I2 ≠ I1 and is preempted by I1. An ETCI2 is called ‘preempted’ by ETCI1 iff COM(ETCI1) is patented, and COM(ETCI2) comprises COM(ETCI1) and satisfies the requirements of §§ 101/102/103/112. Thereby for an ETCI its COM(ETCI) is defined to be the specification of the combination of all ETCI-elements equipped with properties (as exemplified by the below Box2). Without this insertion, ETCIs would be PE also if potentially preempting an arbitrary number of ETCIs. This would devalu-ate the original patent by depriving it of its constitutionally granted monopoly potential (or force all such later patent(s) to show the former one was unlawful). The Supreme Court explained in Mayo, this ●disincentivizes inventors and investors to engage in long-term & high-risk & high-cost development for creating high-value ETCIs, e.g. of the life-cycle areas, and ●thus threatens the political acceptability of the US NPS by the US society ─ also as SPL-precedents on ETCIs then is inconsistent & unpredictable.

This implies: The Supreme Court requires this adjective. What the term ‘limited’ therein means clarifies the end of ANNEX II. NOTE: This way of determining an ETCI’s PE is even legally robust, i.e. so granted patents cannot be revoked by SPL-reasons!!!

Typical examples of ETCIs threatening to put the US NPS into jeopardy are the currently granted CRISPR patents: Their spe-cifications confirm that they preempt very many future potential patents ─ hence barring investments necessary for creating them.

.d Yet this consolidation requires that the wording of the 2019 PE-Guideline ─ complemented by the in[526] as missing declared test7 of the FSTP-Test ─ is interpreted (and complemented) as indicated in[526], i.e. such that this interpretation exactly describes the specification of an ETCIs’ PE test that the Supreme Court provided by its Alice opinion.

.e While this mail is focused on § 101, two remarks as to the proposed modifications of §§ 100 & 112 are important: ●Although the EPC also uses the term “technology” (to which it limits inventions) its meaning is by far too complex to be definable, and ●the huge BIOETCI problems with § 112 ─ explained in[495] ─ are by the above proposal not touched at all.

536_C.101.I_V.8-DOSC 01.06.2019 [536] page 2 of 3

Copyright by ‘TELES Patent Rights International’, 2004-2019, Berlin.

ANNEX II: The AI-Based FSTP-Test. While the following presentations seem, at a first glance, to be based on demanding Mathematics, they in fact are trivial.2.a)

Box1 & Boxes 2&3 outline ─ of a top-down specification of the AI-based SPL-satisfaction-test of ETCIs ─ the FSTP-Test’s semantics structures of ●SPL, of ●its exemplary (MyriadBIO)ETCI, and of ●its latter’s (ETCI-independent) CI and 2 CCs.

Box1: The bottom boxes in this graph are the tests of the elementary properties of the ETCI-element combination already addressed by the Supreme Court framework decisions quoted below these boxes. The line above them quotes the mratsections of SPL, and the line above the latter one states the political mphysconcerns of socioeconomy that politically carries the SPL and that is politically threatened by totally excemptive ETCIs ─ as the Supreme Court correctly recognized , especially by Mayo/Alice.

Myriad-BIOETCI1/7 Its definition ─ as COM(mratETCI)::= {O-crC0n ::= mphysO-MUIS0n, 1≤n≤N, identifying TT0 by E-crC0S and its E-xcrC0S} {A-crC0n, 1≤n≤N} [superfluous for BIOETCIs[488]] {E-crC0Smrat ::={E-crC0k E-ncrC0k ::= k-IDL-sentences, disclosed by E-mratMUIS0k, 1≤k≤K} ─

has N∷= 4 ETCI-elements: X1∷= Tissue_of_testee (TT), X2∷= Wildtype-info (WT), X3::= Detector&Indicator of alteration of a BRCA1 gene (DEIN), X4::= Application (APP), with K∷= 10 E-properties, abbreviated by E-crCk::= ek. ratEcrC0S∷= { (e1,1 =)e1∷= T(issue_of_)T(estee)GS(equence)o(f)B(RCA)1g(ene)● (e1,2 =)e2∷= TTGSoB1R● (e1,3 =)e3∷= TTGSoB1c●; (e2,1 =)e4∷= WTGSoB1g● (e2,2 =)e5∷= WTGSoB1R● (e2,3=)e6∷= WTGSoB1c●; (e3,1=)e7∷= diff(e1,e4) v diff(e2,e5) v diff(e3,e6)≠Φ● [resp. (e3,2=)7e87∷= APP●; (e4,1=)7e97∷= allele (TTGSoB1gϵhybrid(probeGSoB1g & isolgDNA⊂TTGSoB1g))●

(e4,2=)7e107∷= e1● ]}. E3Pred1/7∷=e97 ─ i.e.: Myriad-BIOETCI1/7 is PE/nPE iff E3Pred1/7 =T/F.

Box2: Except in COM(ETCI), right side expressions’ bold/normal letters indicate BIO-IDLterms resp. ETCI-specific terms[508]. Myriad-BIOETCI1/7::= COM(mratBIOETCI) represents an O/A/E-KR[355] of the BIOETCI1/7 to be PE-tested on the E-level.

Metarational Claim Interpretation, mratCI: <external input::= mratCI, internal output ::= the above COM(mratETCI)> & begin: 1) if [COM(ETCI) is factually E-complete˄-correct˄-definite˄{O-inC0n = ˄1≤k≤Kn(E-inC0nkE-ninC0nk),∀1≤n≤N} ˄ Σ1≤n≤N Kn=K] then go on; 2) if [{(O-inC0n, E-inC0nk) | ∀1≤n≤N ˄ 1≤k≤Kn} are ex- or implicitly lawfully_disclosed] then go on; 3) if [O-crC0n is ex- or implicitly enablingly disclosed, ∀1≤n≤N] then output COM(mratETCI) & stop.

(Meta)Rational Claim Construction, (m)ratCC: <internal input::= COM(mratETCI), external output ::= COM(ratETCI)> & begin: 4) if [COM(mratETCI) is mrat‘directed to an exceptional concept’, i.e. rat’comprises an nPE TT0’] then go on; 5) if [COM(mratETCI) is mrat‘an application of TT0’, i.e. rat’the application uses TT0 without modifying it’] then go on; 6) if [COM(mratETCI) is mrat‘transforming the nature of the claim’, i.e. rat‘transforming the claim’s nature nPE into PE’] then go on; 7) if [COM(mratETCI) is mrat=rat‘(together with TT0) significantly more than TT0 then I input COM(RS) mrat ≡ O-/A-/E-crCnS, 1≤n≤N and go on; 8) if [COM(mratETCI) has a definite A/N-Matrix over RS] then go on; 9) if [COM(mratETCI) has a creative height, crH ≥ 2)] then I output ‘COM(ETCI)rat is PE resp. PA’; & stop.

BIOMathematical Claim Construction, matBIOCC: <internal input::= COM(mratETCI), external output ::= COM(matBIOETCI)> & begin: 4’) as [E-xcrCSTT0 ≠ Φ]a) then go on; 5’) as [TT0scope(E-crCSETCI) scope(E-crCSTT0)] then go on; 6’) as [∄ E-xcrCE-crCSETCI\E-crCSTT0] then go on; 7’) as [( E-crC E-crCSETCI\E-crCSTT0) basically independent of E-crCSTT0] then I input COM(RS) rat≡ O-/A-/E-crCnS, 1≤n≤N and go on 8’) if [∀i,n,k∃Δi,n,k ∷= if (E-crCink = E-crC0nk) ‘A’ else ‘N’] then go on; 9’) if [crH ::= ∑1≤n≤N (min∀i[1,I] I{<Δi,n,1="N", ...., Δi,n,Kn="N">}I )≥2] then I output ‘COM(ETCI)matBIO is PE resp. PA’; & stop.

Boxes3: For BIOETCIs’ notion ‘scope’ (CI & CC) is extremely simple, as any E-crC0nk’s domain has only its single value shown by Box2[508].

The notion of ‘limited preemptivity’ of an ETCI deserves some explanationb). A preemption occurs when for a patented ETCI is excluded that over its patent’s ‘life-time’ ─ often 20 years ─ it gets another patent because its scope autonomously expands. This event potentially occurs, if during this time period one of its facts expands (due to progress created in some ETCI- related area impacting on its specification) ─ facts being e.g. the set of this ETCI’s known ●’generation procedures’ in SPL (by its patent specification not necessarily modeled and limited, but solely proven to exist by its above ‘enabling test3’), or ●applications (by its patent specification in pre-Mayo SPL not necessarily identified), or ●its constituents (in

2 .a ─ once understood. I.e., they are of the intricacy shown in the 50s by C. Shannon’s[FSTP] fascinating example of ‘semantics inferring’ in commu-

nications, even of only ‘non-semiotic’ semantics. Hence, they are here repeated and explained by the end of this mail as to an important detail.

.b The Supreme Court’s framework decisions solely indicate that there is a trade-off, for any patented ETCI, between the necessities of ●including into its scope patents of to it very low-preemptivityc) ETCIs (as these are obvious derivations from the first one, i.e. are nPE, thus protecting this first one by executing this preemption), and ●alternatively granting new patents to such nonobvious derivations, i.e. not preventing patenting them.

.c The Supreme Court’s framework remains mute as to the question, how many different (basically independent[526]) E-crCs are needed for overcoming that obvious verdict. The German BGH is patenting friendly and hence has the thumb rule that nonobviousness is indicated by “≥2” (as used in the above test9/9’) different (basically independent) E-crCs.

X1: TT ≅ e1 e2 e3

X2: WT ≅ e4 e5 e6

X3: DEIN ≅ e8 ˅ e7

X4: APP ≅ e97 e107

AN matrix over RS(test8)

Creative height crH over RS

(test9)

Significantly more than TT0

(test7)

Transforming the Nature

(test6)

Application of TT0 nature

(test5)

Unlimited TT0 preemptivity

(test4)

ETCI’s enabling disclosures

(test3)

ETCI’s legal disclosures

(test2)

ETCI’s Novelty v Nonobviousness [over RS]

§ 101 ≡ PE§ 112 ≡ SPL Total Definedness § 102 ≡ PA § 103 ≡ PA

ETCI’s Semantics-Definedness, Legal Disclosure, Enabling ETCI’s Novelty ˄ Usefulness [without RS]

Bilski/Mayo/Myriad/Alice

˄˄ ˄ ˄ ˄ ˄ ˄ ˄

ETCI’s basic properties

(test1)

Biosig GrahamKSRRefined Claim Construction (CC)Refined Claim Interpretation (CI)

FSTP-Test

536_C.101.I_V.8-DOSC 01.06.2019 [536] page 3 of 3

Copyright by ‘TELES Patent Rights International’, 2004-2019, Berlin.

pre-Mayo SPL by its patent specification not identified in a veryfiable way consistent to e.g. the ‘enabling test3’) ─ and thus potentially renders an alleged CTCI as an ETCI of preemptivity ranging from potentially very low to very high2.b).

The Supreme Court defined ●a provision, the ‘x-type crC’ alias ‘exceptional crC, xcrC’, for enabling everybody involved in qualifying an ETCI to indicate to any reader of the latter that the former has recognized in its COM(ETCI) an xcrC, ●2 categories of crCs ─ namely ‘natural phenomena’ and ‘abstract ideas’ ─ that always are modeled by xcrCs, i.e. come with the likelihood to cause preemptions, and ●for any ETCI the uniform specification of a PE-test algorithm, a counterpart of which (i.e. an all xcrCs encapsulation) that renders that ETCI as limited PE and hence PE.

Finally: These terms ‘natural phenomena’, ‘abstract ideas’, … may be dropped. But the by them signaled semiotic SPL-refinement is extremely desirable for indicating potential preemptions necessary for excluding covering an ETCI by several patents with different owners. Without such preemptions there is no consistency and hence predictability in SPL precedents about ETCIs.

The FSTP-Project’s Reference List (Version of 30.05.2019) Many FSTP-Project mails, including this one, are written in preparation of the textbook[182] – i.e. are not fully self-explanatory independent of other FSTP-mails.

[1] S. Sch indler: “Highest Courts’ Patent Precedents in Mayo/Myriad/CLS/Ultramercia l/LBC: ‘In ventive Concepts’ Accepted – ‘Abstract Ideas’ Next? Patenting ‘Emerging Technology Inventions’ Now without Intrica cies?” , publ. 2011*)

.

[2] The term ‘Artificial Intelligence’ here denotes specific cutting edge deterministic IT & Mathematics areas, e.g. in Knowledge Representation (KR)/ Description Logic (DL)/ Natural Language (NL)/ Semantics/ Semiotics/ (Nonsequential) System Design/…, i.e. a resilient fundament for analyzing 35 USC/SPL by AI-based ”Facts Screening/Transforming/Presenting, FSTP”-Technology, deve-loped here, induced by the US Supreme Court’s framework decisions[182]- All the ETCIs’ meanings, especially Molecular Biology meanings of all ‘BIO-prefixed ’ acronyms, are based on so understood AI.

[3] R . Bra ch ma n n, H . L e ve sq u e: “ Kn o w led g e R epre se n t . & Re a so n ing” , Else v ie r , 20 0 4. [4] F . Ba a de r , D. C a lvan e se , D . McGu in e ss, D. N a rd i, P. Pa te l -Sch n e id e r : “ Th e D e scr ip t io n L o g ic Ha n db o o k” , C U P, 2 0 10 .

[5] S. Schindler: “Math. Modeling SPL Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up”, Yokohama, 2012*) [6] S. Sch in d le r , “F ST P” p a t . a p p l .: “ T H E F ST P EXPER T S YST E M” , 2 01 2

* ).

[7] S. Sch in d le r , “D S” p a t . a p pl . : “ AN I N N OVA T I ON EXPER T SYST EM, I ES, & I T S PT R -D S” , 2 0 13* )

. [8] S. Sch in d le r , J . Sch u lze : “ Te ch n ica l R ep o r t # 1 o n ‘90 2 PT R” , 2 01 4 .

[9] S. Schindler, “Patent Business – Before Shake-up”, 2013/2015/2019 (to be publ. in Q) *). [10] SSBG' s AB t o C AF C in L BC , 2 0 13

* ).

[11] S. Sch in d le r , “ in C” pa t . a pp l. : “ in C EN ABL ED SEMI -AU T O. T EST S OF P AT EN T S” , 2 0 13* )

. [12] C . C o r re a : “H a nd b oo k o n Prot . o f I P u nd e r WT O R u le s” , EE, 2 0 10 . [13] N . Klu n ke r : "Ha rmo n is ie ru n g sbe st . im ma t . Pa te n tre ch t” , MPI , 2 0 10 . [14] “ U SPT O/ MPEP: “ 2 1 11 C la im I n te rp re t at io n ; Bro ad e st R e a son . I n te rp re ta t io n”

).

[15] S. Sch in d le r : “ KR Su p po r t fo r SPL Pre ced e n t s” , Ba rce lon a , e KN OW -2 0 14* )

. [16] J. D a ily , S. Kie f f : “ An yt . u nd e r t h e Su n Ma de b y H u ma n s SPL Do ct r in e a s En d . I n st it . f o r C o mm. I n no va t io n” , St an f o rd/ GWU

* ).

[17] C AF C En b an c H ea r in g in L BC , 1 2 .0 9 .2 0 13 . [18] U SSC : SSBG’ s AB in C L S, 0 7 . 10 . 20 1 3

* ).

[19] U SSC : SSBG’ s AB in Wi ld T a n g t , 2 3. 0 9. 2 01 3* )

. [20] U SPT O, “ I nt e lle ct u a l Prop e r t y an d t h e U S Econ o my: I N D UST R . I N F OC U S” , 2 01 2

* ).

[21] K. O 'Ma lle y: Ke yn o t e Ad d re ss, I PO, 20 1 3* )

. [22] S. Sch in d le r , “ An I n ve n to r Vie w a t t he Gra ce Pe r iod” , Kie v, 20 1 3

* ).

[23] S. Sch in d le r , “ T h e I ES a n d in C Ena b le d SPL T e st s” , Mu n ich , 2 0 13* )

. [24] S. Sch in d le r , “ T w o Fu nd . T he ore ms o f ‘Ma t h . I n no va t ion Scie n ce ’” , H on g Kon g , EC M -2 0 1 3

* ).

[25] S. Sch in d le r , A. Pa sch ke , S. R a ma kr ish n a , “ Fo rm. L eg . R e a s. t ha t an Inve n . Sa t is . SPL ” , Bo lo gn a , JUR I X -2 01 3* )

. [26] U SSC : SSBG’ s AB in Bi lsk i, 0 6 . 08 . 20 0 9

* ).

[27] T . Be n ch -C ap on , F . C oe n en : “ I so mo. an d L e ga l Kn o w led g e Ba se d Syst e ms” , AI &L a w , 1 99 2* )

. [28] N . F u ch s, R . Sch w it te r . "At t . t o C o n. E. " , 1 9 96 . [29] A. Pa sch ke : “ R u le s / L og ic Pro g ra mmin g in t he We b” . 7. I SS, Ga lw a y, 2 01 1 . [30] K. Ash le y, V. Wa lke r , “ F ro m I n fo. t o Arg . R e t r. f o r L eg a l Ca se s” , Bo lo gn a , JUR I X -2 01 3

* ).

[31] C AF C , H . in O ra c le / Go o g le, “ As t o Co p yr ig h t a b il i t y o f t h e Ja va Pla t f .” , 06 . 12 . 20 1 3. [32] S. Sch in d le r , “ A KR Ba se d I n no . E. Sys. ( I ES) f o r U S SPL Pre ced s” , Ph u ke t, I CI I M -2 0 14

* ).2

[33] S. Sch in d le r , “ St a t u s R e po r t a b ou t th e F ST P Pro t ot yp e” , H yd e ra b ad , G I PC -20 1 4. [34] S. Sch in d le r , “ St a t u s o f t h e F ST P Pro t o t yp e” , Mo sco w , L ESI , 2 01 4 . [35] S. Sch in d le r , I PR -MEMO: “ D e f in it ion a l D is t in ct io n s b e t we en ─ a n d C o mmo n Ba se N ee d ed of ─ Sub s. T rad e ma rk L aw , Sub s. C op yr ig h t L a w, an d Sub s. Pa t en t L a w” , in p re p . [36] S. Sch in d le r , “ Bo o n a nd Ba ne o f I n ve n t ive Co n cep t s an d Re f in ed C la im C on st ru ct io n in th e Sup re me C ou r t 's N ew Pa te n t Pre ced en t s", Be rke le y, I PSC , 0 8 .0 8 .2 0 14

* ).

[37] D. Bey, C. Cotropia, "The Unreasonableness of the BRI Standard", AIPLA, 2009 *). [38] C AF C , T ra n scr ip t o f th e H e a r ing in T EL ES vs. C I SC O/ U SPT O, 08 . 01 . 20 1 4

* ).

[39] C AF C , T ra n scr ip t o f th e e n b a n c H e a r ing in CL S vs. AL I C E, 0 8 .0 2 .2 0 13* )

. [40] SSBG' s Br ie f t o t h e C AF C in ca se '4 53

* ).

[41] SSBG' s Br ie f t o t h e C AF C in ca se '9 02* )

. [42] SSBG' s Am icu s Br ie f t o t h e C AF C in ca se C L S, 0 6 .1 2 .2 01 2

* ).

[43] S. Sch in d le r , “L A C ” p a t . a p p l. : „ Se mi-Au t o . Gen . / Cu st om. o f (All) C o n f irma t ive Le g a l Arg . C ha in s (L AC s) in a C I `s SPL T e st , En a b led b y I t s In ve n t ive C o n cep t s” , 2 0 14* )

. [44] R . R ad e r , S. Sch in d le r : Pan e l d isc. "Pa t en t s on L if e Scie n ce s", Be r lin , L ESI , 20 1 2. [45] U SSC : SSBG’ s AB a s t o C I I s , 2 8 .0 1 . 2 01 4

* ).

[46] S. Schindler: "Autom. Deriv. of Leg. Arg. Chains (LACs) from Arguable Subtests (ASTs) of a Claimed Invention's Test for Satisfying. SPL", U Warsaw, 24.05.2014 *).

[47] S. Schindler: "Automatic Generation of All ASTs for an Invention's SPL Test". *). [48] U SPT O/ MP EP, “ 2 0 12 Pro c. fo r Su b j. Mat . Eli. . . . o f Pro. C la ims I n v. L a w s of Na t u re ” , 20 1 2

* ).

[49] U SPT O/ MP EP, Su p p . Ex. Gu id e li. fo r D et e rm. C o mp li. w ith 35 U . S. C. 11 2 ; MPEP 2 1 7 1* )

. [50] N AU T I L U S v. BI OSI G , PF C , 2 01 3 * ). [51] BI OSI G , R e sp o nd en t , 2 0 13

* )

[52] Pu b lic Kn o w le d g e e t a l. , AB, 20 13* )

. [53] Ama zo n e t a l., AB, 2 01 3

* ).

[54] Wh it e H ou se , F AC T SH EET - . .. t he Pre s id . ’s C a ll t o St r . Ou r PS an d Fo st e r In n o. , 2 0 14* )

. [55] B. R u sse l: “ Pr in c ip ia Ma t h e ma t ica” , see w ik ip e d ia. [56] C AF C D e cis io n Ph il l ip s v . AWH C o rp . , 1 2 .0 7 .2 0 05 [57] M. Ad e lma n , R . R a de r , J . T h o ma s: "Ca se s an d Ma te r ia ls o n Pa te n t L aw ", We st AP, 20 09 . [58] SSBG' s Am icu s Br ie f t o t h e Su p re me C o u r t a s to it s ( I n )D e f in it en e ss Que st ’s , 0 3 .0 3 , 2 01 4

* ).

[59] S. Sch in d le r , “U I ” p a t . a p p l. : “ An I ES C a p . o f S -Au t o. Gen . / In vo kin g All L AC s in th e SPL -T … , Ea n. b y I n C s” , 2 01 4* )

. [60] S. Sch in d le r : "Au t o . D e r . o f A ll Arg . Ch a in s Le g . D ef . Pa te nt in g / Pa te n te d In ve nt io n s", I SPI M, Mo n tr e al , 6. 1 0. 2 01 4 ,

* ).

[61] H . We gn e r : " In d f. , th e Sl. G ia nt in SPL ", ww w . la ip la. n et / ha l-w e g ne rs- t o p -t e n -p a te n t -ca se s/. [62] . a ) C AF C d e cis io n on re e xa min a t io n o f U. S. Pa t . N o. 7 ,1 4 5, 9 02 , 2 1 .0 2 .2 0 14

* ).

[63] . b ) C AF C d e cis io n on re e xa min a t io n o f U. S. Pa t . N o 6 ,9 5 4 ,4 53 , 04 . 04 . 20 14* )

.

[64] B. Wegner, S. Schindler: "A Mathe. Structure Modeling Inventions", Coimbra, CICM-2014*). [65] SSBG ’s Pe t it io n t o th e C AF C f o r R e he a r in g En Ba n c in t h e ‘9 02 ca se , 1 8. 0 4. 2 01 4

* ).

[66] C AF C : VED ER I vs. GOOGL E, 1 4 .0 3 .2 0 14 [67] C AF C : T H ER ASEN SE d e cis io n , 2 5 . 05 . 20 1 1 [68] B. F ia cco : Amicu s Br ie f t o t h e C AF C in VERSAT A v. SAP &U SPT O, 2 4 . 0 3 .1 4

* ).

[69] USSC, Transcript of the oral argument in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, 31.03.2014*). [70] R . R ad e r , Ke yn o te Sp ee ch : “ Pat . La w a n d L it i. Ab .” , ED T e x Ben ch an d Ba r C o nf . , 0 1. 1 1. 2 01 3

* ).

[71] S. Sch in d le r , Ke yn o te Sp ee ch : “e Kn o w le d g e o f SPL – T ra il Bla ze r in t o t he I nn o vat io n Age ” , Ba rce lo na , e KN OW -2 0 1 4* )

. [72] . a ) S. Sch in d le r : “ Th e U SSC 's ‘SPL I n i t . ’ : Sc i. I t s SPL I n te rp re t a. R e mo ve s 3 Eve rg. SPL Ob scu r it ie s” , PR , 0 8 .0 4 .2 0 14

* ).

. b ) S. Sch in d le r : “ Th e Sup re me Co u r t ’s ‘SPL I n it ia t ive ’: Sc i. I t s SPL In t . R e m. 3 Eve rg . SPL Ob sc. a n d En . Au to . in a CI ’s SPL T e st s a nd Arg . C h a in s” , H o no lu lu , I AM2 0 1 4 S, 1 8 .0 7 .1 4* )

. [73] . a ) U SPT O/ MPEP: “ 2 0 14 Pro ce d u re F o r Su b je ct Ma tt e r Elig ib il i t y An a lys i s O f C la ims R e cit in g Or I n vo lv in g L a w s O f N a tu re / Na t u ra l Pr in c ip le s, N a t u ra l Ph en ome n a , An d / Or N a tu ra l Pro d u ct s” , [ 48 , 49 ] , 2 0 14

* ).

. b ) MEMOR AN D U M: “ Pre lim. Exa mi n . I n st ru ct ion s in v ie w o f A li ce v. C L S”* )

. [74] B. We g n e r : "T h e Mat h . Ba ckg ro u nd of Pro v in g I n C s Ba sed C la ime d I n v. Sa t is f ie s SPL” , 7. G I PC , Mu mb a i, 1 6. 0 1. 2 01 5 .

* )

[75] C AF C Ord e r a s t o d e n ia l [ 6 5] , 27 . 05 . 20 1 4 [76] D . C rou ch : “ En Ban c F e d. C ir . Pan e l Ch a ng e s th e L a w o f C la im C o n st ru ct io n” , 13 . 07 . 20 05

* ).

[77] Vid e o o f t he U SPT O H e a r ing , 09 . 05 . 20 14* )

. [78] R . R ad e r , Ke yn o te Sp ee ch at GT I F , Ge n e va , 20 14 an d L ESI , Mo sco w , 20 1 4 [79] S. Sch in d le r : “ On th e BR I -Sch ism in t h e U S N PS …” , p u b l. 2 2. 0 5. 2 01 4 .

* )

[80] U SSC : SSBG’ s Pf C in t h e ‘90 2 ca se , D ra f t_ V. 1 33 _ of _ [1 21 ] , p u b l. 1 4. 0 7. 2 01 4* )

. [81] S. Sch in d le r : “ T o Who m is I n t e re st e d in t he Su pre me C ou r t ’s Bio s ig D e cis io n ”

* )

[82] R . D e Be ra rd in e : “ I nn o .C o rp . Pe r. ” , F C BA* )

. [83] SSBG ’s Pe t it io n t o th e C AF C f o r R e he a r in g En Ba n c in t h e ‘4 53 ca se , 0 9. 0 6. 2 01 4

* ).

[84] C AF C ’s O rd e r a s t o d en ia l [ 83 ] , 1 4 .0 7 .2 01 4* )

. [85] C AF C : “ At T h ree D e ca d e s” , D C , 2 01 2 . [86] S. Sch in d le r F o u nd a t io n : “ T ra n sa t lan t ic C oo p . f o r G row t h a nd Se cu r it y” , D C, 20 1 1. [87] D PMA: “ R e ce nt De ve lo p me nt s a nd T re nd s in U S Pa te n t L aw“ , Mu n ich , 2 01 2 . [88] F C BA: “ I nn o ., T rad e , F is . R e a l.” , C o l. S. , 20 1 3. [89] L ESI : GT I F , Gen e va , 2 01 4 . [90] F C BA: “ Sh a rp. C . Ma n .” , Ash e vil le , N . C ., 20 1 4 [91] B. We g n e r , S. Sch in d le r : "A Ma t h. KR Mo d. f o r C la im I n te r . . & C on . " , in p rep . [92] SSBG ’s Pe t it io n f o r Wr it o f C e r t io ra r i t o t h e Su p re me C o u r t in th e ‘45 3 ca se, 06 . 10 . 20 1 4

* ).

[93] E. Mo r r is : “ Wh a t is ‘T e ch n o lo g y’?” , I U I . N .* )

[94] E. Mo r r is : “ A li ce , Ar t if ice , an d Act io n – a n d U lt ra me rc ia l” , I U I . N ., 08 . 07 . 20 1 4

* ).

[95] S. Sch in d le r , ArAcPE P-M EMO: “ Ar t if ice , Act io n , a nd th e Pa t. -Eli. Pro b . ” , in p re p ., 20 1 4. [96] A. C h o p ra : “ De e r in t he H ea d lig h t s . R e spo n se o f I n cu mb en t F irms t o … ” , Scho o l o f Ma n ag e me n t, F r ib ou rg , 2 01 4

* ).

[97] S. Sch in d le r , D is I n T e ch -MEMO: “ R &D o n Pat . Te ch . : Eff . a n d Sa f e t y Boo st .” , in p rep . , 2 01 4 . [98] G. Bo o lo s, J . Bu rg e ss, R . Je f f re y: “ C o mpu t a b i l i t y a n d Lo g ic” , Ca mb r id g e U P, 2 00 7 . [99] A. H irsh f e ld , Ale xa nd r ia , PT O, 22 . 07 . 20 14

* ).

[100] C . C hu n : “ PT O ’s Scru t in y o n So f t wa re Pa te n t s Pa yin g O f f” , L aw 3 60 , N. Y.* )

. [101] P. Mich e l, Ke yn o t e , PT O, 2 2. 0 7 .2 01 4 . [102] D . Jo ne s, Ale xa n d r ia, PT O, 2 2. 0 7. 2 01 4 . [103] R . Go mu lk ie w icz, Se a t t le , C ASR I P, 2 5. 0 7. 1 4. [104] M. L e mle y, Se a t t le, C ASR I P, 25 . 07 . 20 1 4. [105] D . Jo ne s, Se a tt le , C ASR I P, 2 5 .0 7 .2 0 14 . [106] B. L a Ma rca , Sea t t le , C ASR I P, 2 5. 0 7. 2 01 4 . [107] J. D u f f y , Se a tt le , C ASR I P, 2 5 .0 7 .2 0 14 . [108] J. Pa g e nb e rg, Se a tt le , C ASR I P, 2 5 .0 7 .2 0 14 . [109] M. Ad e lma n , Se a tt le , C ASR I P, 2 5 .0 7 .2 0 14 . [110] B. St o ll, Se a t t le , C ASR I P, 2 5. 0 7. 2 01 4 . [111] R . R ad e r , Se a t t le, C ASR I P, 25 . 07 . 20 1 4. [112] E. Bo w e n , C . Yat e s: “ Ju st ice s Sh ou ld Ba ck O f f Pat e nt Elig ib il i t y , … ” , L 36 0

* ).

[113] S. Schindler: “The CAFC’s Rebellion is Over – The USSC, by Mayo/Biosig/Alice, ...”, publ. 07.08.2014*). [114] S. Ell io t t : “ T he U SPT O Pa t en t Su b j. Ma t t e r Elig i. Gu id an ce T RI PSs” , 30 . 07 . 20 14

* ).

[115] W. Z h e ng : “ Exh au st in g Pa te n t s” , Be rke le y, I PSC , 0 8 .0 8 .2 0 14* )

. [116] R . Me rg e s: “ I n d. In v. : A L imit e d D e fe n se o f Ab so lut e In f r in ge me n t L ia b il i t y in Pa t en t L a w” , Be rke le y, I PSC , 08 . 08 . 20 14 * ) . [117] J. Sa rn o f f, Be rke le y, I PSC , 0 8 .0 8 .2 01 4 . [118] H . Su rd en : “ Pr in c ip le s o f Prob le ma t ic Pa t s” , Be rke le y, I PSC , 0 8 .0 8 .2 0 14

* ).

[119] w w w . ze it .d e /2 0 13 / 33 / mu lt ip le -sk le ro se -me d ika me n t - t e cf ide ra / se ite -2 *).

[120] J. Me rk le y, M. Wa rn e r , M. Beg ich , M. H e inr ich , T . Ud a l: “L e t te r to H on . Pen n y Pr it zke r ” , D C , 0 6. 0 8. 2 01 4* )

. [121] U SSC : SSBG’ s Pf C in ‘9 0 2 ca se, 25 . 08 . 20 1 4

* ).

[122] D . Pa rn a s, se e Wik ip e d ia. [123] E. D ijkst ra , se e Wik ip e d ia . [124] S. Sch in d le r : “ C o mp ut e r O rga n iza t io n I I I” , 3. Se me st e r C la ss in C o mp . Sc. , T U B, 19 7 4 -1 9 84 . [125] S. Sch in d le r : “ N on se q ue n t ia l Alg o r it h ms” , 4. Se me st e r C la ss in C o mp . Sc. , T U B, 19 78 -1 98 4 . [126] S. Sch in d le r : “ Op t ima l Sa t e ll i t e O rb it T ra n sf e rs” , Ph D T h e sis , T U B, 1 97 1 . [127] U SSC D e cis io n in KSR v . T e le f le x , 3 0. 0 4. 2 00 7

* )

U SSC D e cis io n in Bi lsk i v . Kap po s , 28 . 06 . 20 1 0* )

U SSC D e cis io n in Ma yo v. Pro me th e u s , 2 0. 0 3. 2 01 2* )

U SSC D e cis io n in A MP v . My ri ad , 13 . 06 . 20 13* )

U SSC D e cis io n in N au ti lu s v . Bio s i g, 02 . 06 . 20 1 4* )

U SSC D e cis io n in A li ce v . C L S , 1 9 .0 6 .2 0 14* )

[128] R . F e ld ma n: “ C o min g o f Age fo r t he F ed e ra l C ircu it ” , Th e Gre e n Ba g 2 0 14 , UC Ha st in g s. [129] G. Qu in n : “ Ju d ge Mich e l sa ys A li ce D e cis io n ‘w il l c re a t e t o ta l ch a o s’” , I PWa t ch,

* ).

[130] G. Frege: “Function und Begriff“, 1891. G. Frege: “Sinn und Bedeutung“.

[131] L . Wit t ge n st e in: “ T ra ct . lo g ico -p h ilo so .” , 1 91 8 . [132] B. We g n e r , MEMO: “ Ab o ut re la t ion s (V. 7 - f in a l)” , 2 5 .0 4 .2 0 13

* ).

[133] B. We g n e r , MEMO: “ Ab o ut co n. o f p re. / con . , scop e a n d so lu t io n o f p rob le ms” , 2 0 .0 8 .2 0 13 . [134] B. We g n e r , MEMO: “ A re f in ed re la t. be tw e e n d o ma in s in BAD se t a nd BED se t” , 1 8 .0 9 .2 0 14 . [135] H . Go dd a rd, S. Sch in d le r , S. St e in b re n e r , J . St ra u ss: F ST P Me e t ing , Be r lin , 2 9 .0 9 .2 0 14 . [136] S. Sch in d le r : “ T u to r ia l o n C o mmo n a lit ie s Be t w ee n Syst e m D e sign an d SPL T e st ing” .

* ).

[137] S. Sch in d le r : “ T h e R a t ion a lit y o f a C la ime d I n ven t io n ’s (C I ’s) po s t -Ma yo SPL T e st – I t I n crea se s C I ’s Le g a l Qu a lit y a nd Pro f e ss io na l Ef f ic ie n cy in C I ’s U se” , in p rep . [138] S. Sch in d le r : “ T h e U SSC Gu id . t o Ro b u st ET C I Pat e nt s” , I CL PT , Ba n g ko k, 22 . 01 . 20 1 5

* ).

[139] U SSC : Ord e r a s to de n ia l [1 2 1] , 1 4 .1 0 .2 0 14* )

.

[140] S. Schindler: “§ 101 Bashing or § 101 Clarification”, published 27.10.2014 *). [141] BGH , “ De mo n st ra t ion ssch ra n k” de cis io n

* ).

[142] B. We g n e r , S. Sch in d le r : “ A Ma th e ma t ica l KR Mo d e l f o r Re f in ed C la im I nt e rp ret a t ion & C on st ru ct io n I I” , in p re p . .. [143] … Pre ss, … … t o g o int o [1 37 ] …… … … [144] “ T u rmo il … . .” , se e p rog ra m o f AI PL A me et in g , D C , 2 3. 1 0. 2 01 4 [145] “ D a rk s ide o f I nn o va t ion” , … … see [1 3 7] [146] D . Ka p po s: Ab ou t h is re ce n t w e st co a st me et in g s, AI PL A, D C , 2 3 .1 0 .2 0 14 . [147] C AF C , T ra n scr ip t o f th e H e a r ing in Bio s ig ca se , 2 9 .1 0 .2 01 4

* ).

[148] R . R ad e r : C o nf irmin g t h at so c ia lly in a cce p t ab le C I s a s e xt re me ly p re e mp t ive , su ch a s f o r e xa mp le [ 11 9 ], sh ou ld be pa t en t -e lig ib le , AI PL A me et in g , D C , 2 4 .1 0 .2 01 4 . [149] A. H irsh f e ld : Ann o un cin g th e U SPT O’s re a d in e ss t o con sid e r a lso h yp o. C I s in it s EG, AI PL A me e t in g , D C , 2 4. 1 0. 2 01 4 . [150] S. Sch in d le r : “ A li ce -T e st s En ab le ‘Qu a nt if y in g ’ T h e ir In ve nt ive C on ce p t s … “ , U SPT O&GWU , 0 6 . 0 2. 2 01 5

* ), se e a lso [1 7 5]

* ).

[151] S. Sch in d le r : “ Bio s ig , R e f ine d b y A li ce , Va st ly In cre a se s th e R o bu st n e ss o f Pa te n t s” , in p rep .“* )

. [152] S. Sch in d le r : ” Au t o . D e r iv . / Re p rod . o f L AC s, Pro t e ct in g Pa t en s Ag a in st SPL At ta cks” , Sin ga p o re , I SPI M, 0 9 . 12 . 20 1 4

* ).

[153] S. Sch in d le r : “ Pra ct ica l I mp a ct s o f t he Ma yo /A li ce / Bio s ig -T e st” , t . , D ra ke Un i. La w Sch oo l, 27 . 03 . 20 1 5* ) [154] C AF C D e cis io n in In t e rva l, 1 0 .0 9 . 2 01 4

* ).

[155] S. Sch in d le r : “ A T u t o r ia l int o (Ope ra t ing ) Sys. D e sig n a n d AI T T e rms/ N o t ion s on R ig o ro u s ET C I s ' An a lys is . “ , in p re p . [156] C AF C D e cis io n in D DR , 0 5 .1 2 . 2 01 4

* ).

[157] USPTO: “2014 Int. Guidance on Pat. Subj. M. Eli. & Examples: Abs. Ideas” *). [158] U SSC ’s Ord e r a s t o d e n ia l [ 9 2] , 08 . 12 . 20 14

* ).

[159] C AF C D e cis io n in My ri a d, 17 . 12 . 20 1 4* )

. [160] S. Sch in d le r : “ T h e U SSC Ma y o/ My r ia d /A li ce De cis io n s, T h e PT O ’s I mp le me n t at io n b y I t s I EG, T h e C AF C ’s D D R & My ri ad R e ce n t D e cis io n s”

* ), p u b l. 1 4 .0 1 .2 01 5

* ), i t s sh o r t ve rs io n

* ), a nd it s PP p re sen t a t ion at U SPT O, 21 . 01 . 20 1 5

* ). .

[161] S. Sch in d le r : ” T h e I ES: Ph il. & F u n c. &, Ma . F . – A Pro to .” , 7 . G I PC , Mu mb a i, 16 . 01 . 20 1 5* )

. [162] C AF C D e cis io n in C ET , 2 3 .1 2 .2 0 14

* ).

[163] S. Sch in d le r : “ T h e U SSC ’s Ma y o / My ri ad / A li ce De cis io n s: T h e ir Ove r in te rp re t. vs. Ove rs im p l o f ET C I s – Sc ie . o f SPL Pre c. a s t o ET C I s in Act io n: T h e C AF C ’s My r ia d & C ET De cis io n s” , U SPT O, 0 7 .0 1 .2 0 15* )

. [164] J. Sch u lze , D . Scho e nb e rg , L . H un g e r , S. Sch in d le r : “ I n t ro. to th e I ES U I o f t he F ST P -T e st “ , 7 . G I PC , Mu mb a i, 1 6 .0 1 .2 0 15

* ). [165]

“ AL I C E AN D PAT EN T D OOMSD A Y I N T H E N EW YEAR ” , I PO, 06 . 01 . 20 1 5 * ) .

[166] S. Sch in d le r : “ T o da y’s SPL Pre ce d e n t s a n d I t s Pe rspe ct ive s, D r ive n b y ET C I s” , 7. G I PC , Mu mb a i, 1 5. 0 1. 2 01 5* )

. [167] R . Sa ch s: “ A Su rve y of Pa t . I n v. s in ce A li ce” . F &W L L P, L a w3 60 , Ne w Yo rk, 1 3 .0 1 .2 0 15

* ).

[168] S. Sch in d le r : “ PT O ’s I EG F o ru m – So me Af t e rma th ” , pu b l. 1 0 .0 2 .2 0 15* )

. [169] Ag e n d a o f t h is F o ru m o n [1 57 ] , Ale xa nd r ia , U SPT O, 2 1 . 01 . 20 15

* ).

[170] G. Qu in n : “ Pat e nt Eli. F o r . D iscu ss. Ex. Ap p li. of Ma yo / My ri ad / A li ce” , I PWa t ch d , 2 1 .0 1 .2 01 5* )

[171] S. Sch in d le r : “ Se mio t ic I mp a ct s o f t h e Su p re me C o u r t ’s May o / Bio s ig /A li ce De cis io n s o n L e g. An a l. ET CI s”

* ).

[172] U SSC D e cis io n in T e va , 2 0. 0 1. 2 01 5* )

. [173] U SSC D e c. in Pu llma n -St a n da rd , 2 7. 0 4. 1 98 2

* ).

[174] U SSC D e cis io n in Ma rkma n , 23 . 04 . 19 9 6* )

. [175] S. Sch in d le r : “ Pa t en t ’s R o bu st ne ss & ‘D o u b le Qu a nt if y in g ’ T h e ir In C s a s o f May o /A li ce” , WI PI P. U SPT O&GWU , 0 6 . 02 . 20 15

* ).

[176] R . R ad e r : Qu e st io n s a s to t he F ST P-T e st , WI PI P, U SPT O&GWU , 0 6 .0 2 .2 0 15 . [177] D . Ka rsh t ed t : “ Th e C o mp le t en e ss Re q u. in Pa t L aw ” , WI PI P, U SPT O&GWU , 0 6 .0 2 .2 0 15

* ).

[178] O. L iva k: “ T h e U n re so l. Amb ig u it y o f Pat e nt C la ims” , WI PI P, U SPT O&GWU , 0 6 . 0 2. 2 01 5* )

. [179] J. Mil le r : “ R e a son ab le C e rt a in No t ice” , WI PI P, U SPT O&GWU , 0 6 .0 2 .2 01 5

* )

[180] S. Gh o sh : “ De ma rca t in g N a tu re Af te r My ri ad ” , WI PI P, U SPT O&GWU , 0 6 .0 2 . 20 15* )

[181] C AF C D e cis io n in Cu o zzo , 0 4 .0 2 .2 0 15

* ).

[182] S. Schindler: “Basics of Mathem. Innovation Theory and AI Based Patent Technology”, Textbook, in prep. [183] S. Sch in d le r : “ T h e Ma yo / A li ce SPL T s/ N s in F ST P-T &PT O I n it .” , U SPT O, 16 . 03 . 20 1 5

* ).

[184] S. Sch in d le r : “ PT Os Ef f ic ie n cy I n cre a se b y t h e F ST P -T e st , e .g . EPO a nd U SPT O” , L ESI , Bru sse ls , 1 0. 0 4. 2 01 5* )

. [185] R . C he n : C o mme n t ing po lit e ly o n “ te n s io n s” ab o ut th e BR I, PT O/ I PO -EF D a y, 10 . 03 . 20 1 5. [186] A. H irsh f e ld : Re p . a bo u t t he PT O ’s p ro g re ss of th e I EG wo rk, PT O/ I PO -EF D a y, 10 . 03 . 20 1 5. [187] P. Mich e l: Mo d e ra t in g t he SPL p a ra d ig m re f. b y May o/ A li ce , PT O/ I PO -EF D a y, 10 . 03 . 20 15 . [188] P. Mich e l: Ask in g t h is p a n e l a s t o d iss. o f Ma y o/ A li ce , PT O/ I PO -EF D a y, 1 0 .0 3 .2 0 15 . [189] M. L e e : L un ch eo n Ke yno t e Sp e e ch, PT O/ I PO -EF D a y, 10 . 03 . 20 1 5

* ).

[190] A. H irsh f e ld : Re ma rk o n EPQI ’s re f . o f p a t. ap . e xa min a t io n , PT O/ I PO -EF D a y, 10 . 03 . 20 1 5. [191] 1 6

t h I nt . Ro u nd t . o n Se m. , H ilo , 2 9 .0 4 .2 0 15

* ).

[192] M. Sch e ct e r , D . C rou ch , P. Mich e l: Pa ne l D isc. , Pa t en t Qu a lit y Su mmit , U SPT O, 2 5 . 0 3. 2 01 5 . [193] F in n e g an : 3 fu n d. cu r ren t un ce r t . o n SPL p re c, Pat e nt Qu a lit y Su mmit , U SPT O, 2 5 .0 3 . 20 15 . [194] S. Sch in d le r , B. W e gn e r , J . Sch u lze , D. Sch o en b e rg : “ po st -Ma yo / Bio s ig / A li ce – Th e Pre c ise Me an in g s of T he ir N e w SPL T e rms” , p u b l. 0 8. 0 4. 1 5

* ).

[195] R . St o ll: “ F e d. C ir . C a se s to Wa t ch o n So f t w. Pa t . – Pla ne t Blu e” , Pa t en t ly -O , 0 6 .0 4 .2 01 5* )

. [196] Se e t he pa n e l a t th e I PBC Glo b a l’2 0 1 5, Sa n F ra n cisco , 14 -1 6. 0 6. 2 01 5

* ). .

[197] S. Sch in d le r : “ Ma yo / A li ce – T h e U SSC ’s R e q u ire me nt St a te me n t a s to Se mio t ics in SPL & ET C I s, U SPT O, 0 6 .0 5 .2 0 15 r* )

. [198] S. Sch in d le r : “ Pa t s ’ Ab s. R ob u st . & t h e F ST P-T e st ” , L ESI 2 01 5 , Bru sse ls 1 8 . 04 . 20 15

* ), D BKD A 2 0 1 5 R o me 2 7 .0 5 .2 01 5 .

[199] B. We g n e r : “ T h e F ST P T e st – I t s Ma t he . Asse ss. o f a n ET C I ’s Pra ct ica l a n d SPL Qu a lit y ” , L ESI 20 1 5, Bru sse ls , 1 8 .0 4 .2 01 5* )

. an d D BKD A 20 1 5, R o me , 2 7. 0 5. 2 01 5 . [200] D . Sch o en b e rg : “ T he F ST P T e st : A SW Sys. f o r Ass. an ET C I ’s Pra ct . a n d SPL Qu a lit y ” , L ESI 20 1 5 Bru sse ls 1 8 . 04 . 20 1 5 a nd D BKD A 2 01 5 R o me 27 . 05 . 20 15

* ).

[201] Pa n e l: “ Pa t en t Pro se cut io n Se ssio n” , AI PL A, L A, 31 . 04 . 20 1 5. [202] S. Sch in d le r : ; “ T he N ot io n o f “ In C” , Fu lly Sc ie n t ize d SPL , a nd “ C on t ro lle d Pre e mp t ive” ET C I s” , pu b lish e d b y 11 . 06 . 20 1 5

* ).

[203] I . Ka n t, ht t p :/ / p lat o . s ta n fo rd .e d u/ e nt r ie s/ ka n t /. [204] J. L e f s t in: “ T h e T h ree F a ce s o f Pro me th e u s: A Po st -A li ce Ju r isp ru d en ce o f Ab st ra ct ion” , N. C . J.L . &T EC H , Ju ly 2 01 5

* ).

[205] C AF C D e cis io n in Bio s ig , 27 . 04 . 20 1 5* )

. [206] U SSC Pe t it io n f o r C e r t in U L TR AMER C I AL vs, WI L D T AN GEN T , Ma y 20 1 5. . [207] K. -J. Me lu ll is , re p o r t a bo u t a th u s cau se d p ro b le m w ith a g ran t ed p at e nt at th e X. Sen a te of t he Ge rma n BGH . [208] S. Sch in d le r : “ R ea ch of SPL Pro t . f o r ET C I s o f T ie d Pre e mp t iv it y” , p ub lish e d b y 2 5 .0 6 .2 01 5

* ).

[209] C AF C D e cis io n in Ar io sa , 1 2 .0 6 .2 0 15* )

[210] S. Bra sw e ll: “ A l l R ise f o r C h ie f Ju st ice R ob o t” , Se a n Bra sw e ll , 0 7. 0 6. 2 01 5

* )

[211] S. Sch in d le r : “ T h e C on s. o f I de a s Mo . U SSC ’s MB A -Se m io t ics a n d it s H i-L e ve l” , in p rep . [212] R . Me rg e s: “U n ce r ta in t y , a n d t he St a nd a rd o f Pa t en t ab il i t y ” , 19 9 2

* ).

[213] C AF C D e cis io n in T e va, 18 . 06 . 20 1 5* )

[214] K. O ’Ma lle y, … . . : “ Pat . L it . Ca se Ma n .: Re f o rmin g th e Pat . L it . Pro c. … ” , F C BA, 25 . 06 . 20 1 5. [215] R . C he n ,… . . : “ C la im C o n st ru ct .” , F C BA, 2 6 .0 6 .2 0 15 . [216] P. N a ik , C . L ap o r t e, C , Kin z ig , T . Ch a pp e l, K. Gu p ta : “ Ch a n. I P No rms a n d t h e ir Ef fe ct on In n o. in Bio - / Ph a rma ceu t . - / H igh -T e ch Se cto rs o f t he C o rp o rat e Wo r ld” , F C BA, 2 7. 0 6. 2 01 5 . [217] S. Sch in d le r : “ T h e U S N PS: T h e MBA F ra me w o rk a R ou g h D ia mo nd – b u t R ou g h f o r Eve r? T e va w il l C u t th is D ia mo n d a n d t hu s C rea t e a Me ga -T re nd in SPL” , pu b l. 2 1. 0 7. 2 01 5

* ).

[218] B. Russel: “Principles of Mathematics”, see also Wikipedia. [219] A. v. Wijn g a a rd en , s . Wik ip e d ia [220] C AF C D e cis io n in L BC , 2 3. 0 6. 2 01 5

* ). .

[221] C AF C D e cis io n in Cu o zzo , 0 8 .0 7 .2 0 15* )

.. [222] C AF C D e cis io n in Ve rsa ta , 09 . 07 . 20 15

* )..

[223] C AF C D e cis io n in In t . Ven t u re s, 06 . 07 . 20 1 5* )

. . [224] J. D u f f y , J . Da b ne y: Pf C , 1 3. 0 8. 2 00 9

* ).

[225] S. Sch in d le r : “ A PS t o an Ap p ra isa l to th e U SSC ’s T e va D e cis io n : C AF C Te a min g -u p w it h PT O f o r Ba r r in g Te va – an d th is e n t ire ‘ET Sp ir it ’ F ra me w o rk? ” , p ub 27 . 07 . 20 1 5* )

. [226] R . St o ll , B. La Ma rca , S. Ono , H . God d a rd , N. Ho e ld e r : “ C ha lle n g in g So f t wa re -Bu sin e ss Me t ho d Pa t. Eli. in C iv il Act io n s a n d Po st G ra n t R e vie w” , C ASR I P, Se a t t le, 24 . 07 . 20 1 5. [227] A. Se ra f in i, D . Ke t t e lbe rg e r, J . Ha le y, J . Krau ss: „ Bio te ch an d Pha rma Pa t en t s Elig i. : “ , C AS R I P, Se at t le , 2 4 .0 7 .2 0 15 . [228] D . Ke t te lb e rge r , see [ 22 7 ] [229] Ju st ice Bre ye r : “ Arch ime d e s Me ta p ho r” , [6 9 ]

* ).

[230] I . Ka n t: ht t p s: // e n. w ik ip e d ia . co m/ w ik i/ I mma n u e l_ Ka n t. & I . Ka n t: *C r it iq u e o f Pu re R easo n ” , h tt p s: // e n. w ik ip e d ia . co m/ w ik i/ I _ Ka n t . I . Ka n t: “ T he Me t ap h ysica l F o u nd a t ion s o f N a tu ra l Sc ie n ce “ , Wik ip e d ia.

[231] I . Ka n t: * G ro u nd w o rk o f th e Me ta p h ysics o f Mo ra ls” , h t t p s:/ / en . w ik ip e d ia. o rg/ w ik i/ . [232] I . Ka n t: *C a te g o r ica l I mp e ra t ive” , h t t p s:/ e n. w ik ip e d ia. o rg /w ik i/ C a t eg o r ica l_ I mp e rat ive

I . Ka n t: "Wh a t R ea l Pro g re ss ha s Me t a ph ysics Ma d e in Ge rma n y s in ce th e T ime o f Le ib n iz an d Wo lf f? " , Ab a r isB. , N Y, '83 . [233] I . Ka n t: * Pro leg o me na to An y F u tu re Me ta p h ysics” , h t tp s: / /e n .w ik ip e d ia . o rg / w ik i/ [234] J. D a bn e y: “ T he Re t u rn of t he In ve n t ive C o n ce p t? ” , 06 . 12 . 20 1 2

* ).

[235] . a U SPT O: "Ju ly 2 01 5 Up da t e o n Sub j. Ma t te r Elig ib il i t y" , 3 0 . 0 7 .2 0 15* )

. b U SPT O: „ Ma y 2 01 6 U p da t e: Me mo ra nd u m - R e ce n t Sub j. Ma t t e r Elig ib il i t y D e cis io n s“ , 1 9 .0 5 .2 0 16 * )

[236] C o n ce pt s, ht t p: / / p lat o . s ta n fo rd .e d u/ e nt r ie s/ co n ce pt s/ . [237] S. Sch in d le r : “ T h e Su p re me Co u r t ’s Su b sta n t ive L a w (SPL ) I n te rp re ta t io n – a n d Ka n t“ , p ub l. 1 3. 0 4. 2 01 6

* ).

[238] R . H an n a: “ Ka n t a nd th e Fo u nd a t ion s o f An a ly t ic Ph ilo so p h y” , OU P, 2 0 01 . [239] S. Ko e rn e r : “ Th e Ph ilo sop h y of Ma t he ma t ics” , D OVER , 2 0 09 [240] U SSC : Pf C b y Cu o zzo

* ).

[241] S. Sch in d le r : “ D ra ft o f a n Amicu s Br ie f t o t he U SSC in Cu o zzo sup p o r t ing“ , p u b l. 0 5. 1 1. 2 01 5* )

. [242] Pa n e l: “ T h e Evo lv in g L an d sca pe a t PT AB Pro ce e d in g s” , AI PL A, DC , 22 . 10 . 20 15 [243] M. L e e : Pu b l. In t e rv ie w a t Op e n ing Ple n a ry Se ssio n , AI PL A, D C , 2 1. 1 0. 2 01 5 . [244] S. Sch in d le r : “ T h e I EG ’s 2 0 1 5 U pd a te & t h e ‘Pa t e n t -Elig ib il i t y G ra n t e d/ - in g , PEG ’ T e st” , pu b l. 1 8 .1 2 .2 0 15

* )

[245] M. L e e : U SPT O D ire ct o r 's F o ru m, „ En ha n ced Pa t en t Qua lit y I n it ia t ive : Mo vin g F o rwa rd” , 0 6 .1 1 .2 0 15* )

. [246] I SO/ OSI R e f e ren ce Mo de l o f Op en Syst e ms I n t e rcon n e ct ion , see Wik ip e d ia . [247] S. Gra h a m (L AW. C OM): Q&A Wit h AI PL A Pre s id e n t D en ise D e F ra n co , 1 3. 1 1. 2 01 5

* ).

[248] U SSC D e cis io n in Pa rke r vs. F lo o k, 2 2 .0 6 .1 97 8* )

. [249] C AF C D e n ia l o f En Ban c Pe t it io n in Ar io sa v. Se qu e no m, 0 2. 1 2. 2 01 5

* ).

[250] D . C rou ch (Pa t en t ly -O) : F e de ra l C ircu it Re lu ct a nt ly Af f irms Ar io sa v. Se q u e n o m a n d D e n ie s En Ba n c Re h ea r in g , 0 3. 1 2. 2 01 5* )

[251] S. Sch in d le r : “ Pa t en t -Elig ib il i t y a n d t he “ Pa t en t -Elig ib il i t y G ra n t e d / - in g , PEG” Te st , re sp . th e C AF C Ob je ct . C o un t e rs t h e Su p re me C o u r t ’s MBA F ra me w o rk, b y it s DD R vs . My ri ad / Cu o zzo D e cis io n s” , 0 5. 0 1. 2 01 6

* ).

[252] E. C o e : “ Mich e lle L e e Ste e rs U SPT O T h ro ug h C h op p y Wa te rs” , La w 36 0 , 09 . 12 . 2 01 5* ) . . [253] U SSC C e r t Pe t it io n s in H a lo v . Pu lse an d St ryke r v . Z imme r , 2 2. 0 6. 2 01 5 [254] C AF C Ora l Arg u me n t in McR o v. Ba nd a i, 1 1 .1 2 .2 0 15 [255] C AF C Ora l Arg u me n t in L e xma rk v . I mp re ss io n, 02 . 10 . 20 1 5 [256] C AF C D e cis io n in Ca rn eg ie v . Ma rve ll, 04 . 08 . 20 1 5 [257] S. Sch in d le r : “ A PS a s t o th e Mot io n De cis io n … .” , 1 1. 0 1. 2 01 6

* ).

[258] S. Sch in d le r : “ BR IPT O

b y t he U SPT O o r BR IMBA

b y t h e Su p re me C o u r t?” , 0 3 .0 2 .2 0 16 , * )

. [259] S. Sch in d le r : “ C la ss ica l L imit a t io n s o r MBA F ra me w o rk ’s I n ve n t ive Co n cep t s?” , 0 8 .0 2 .2 01 6

* ),

[260] S. Sch in d le r : “ Pa t en t -Elig ib il i t y : Va g u e F ee lin g s o r an MBA F a ct ?” , p u b. 12 . 02 . 20 1 6* )

[261] S. Sch in d le r , U . D ia z, T . H o f man n , L . H u ng e r , C . Ne g rut iu , D. Sch o en be rg , J . Sch u lze , J . Wan g , B. We gn e r , R . We t z le r : “ T h e U s e r In t e r fa ce De sig n o f an In n o va t io n Expe r t Syst e m (= I ES) f o r Te st in g a n Eme rg in g T e ch no lo g y C la ime d I n ven t io n (= ET C I ) fo r it s Sa t is f y in g Su b st an t ive SPL ” , p. . 0 7 .0 3 .2 0 16 *

)

[262] M. McC o rmic k: " I mma n u e l Ka n t : Me ta ph ysics", w w w . ie p . ut m. e du / ka nt me t a /. [263] M. F u lle r , D . H irsh fe ld , M. Sch e cte r , L . Sh e r ida n , C Br in cke rh o ff (Mo d e ra t o r ) , Pa n e l D isc. , I PO, D C ,1 5 .0 3 .2 0 16 . [264] W. Qu in e , see Wik ip e d ia . [265] U SSC Pf C b y Sa msu n g v. Ap p le , 2 1 .0 3 .2 01 6 [266] "T h e C h ica go Ma nu a l of St y le On lin e ", h t t p: / /w w w . ch ica go ma n ua lo f s t y le . o rg . [267] S. Sch in d le r : “ I D L ” p a t. a p p l . : “ T H E I D L T OOL BOX", 2 0 16 , in p rep . . [268] S. Sch in d le r : “ I ES-U I E” p a t . a p p l. : “ T H E I ES U SER IN T ER F AC E D ESI GN ' ' ” , 20 1 6,

in p rep . .

[269] S. Sch in d le r : “F ST P I I " p a t . a p p l. : “ T H E F ST P- I I” , 20 16*

,,

in p re p .. [270] S. Sch in d le r : “PEGG -T e s t" p a t . a p pl . : “ TH E PI GR AN T I N G/ GR AN T ED T EST ” , 2 01 6 ,

in p re p.

[271] S. Sch in d le r : "T h e Su p re me C ou r t 's MBA F ra me w o rk" I mp lie s "L e ve ls O f Ab st ra ct io n "" , 12 . 05 . 20 1 6* )

[272] S. Sch in d le r : “C SI P” p a t . a p pl . : "C ON T EXT SEN SI T I VE I T EM S PR OM PT I N G ", 2 0 1 6 , in p rep . [273] S. Sch in d le r : “MEMO a b o u t "Ma t he ma t ica l I n ven t ive I nt e ll ig e n ce, MI I " , p u b lish ed on 21 . 06 . 20 16

* )

[274] M. F la n a g an , R . Me rge s, S. Mich e l, A. Ra i, W. T au b : "Af t e r A li ce , Are SW I n no va t io n s Eve r Pa te n ta b le Sub j. Ma t te r? " [275] V. Win t e rs, K. C o ll in s, S. Me ht a , va n Pe lt : "Af t e r Will ia mso n , Are F u n ct ion a l C la ims f o r SW Via b le ? " [276] K. C o ll in s: "T h e Will ia mso n R e vo lu t io n in SW St ru ct u re ", Wa sh in g to n U n ive rs it y , D ra ft 04 / 01 / 16 . [277] C AF C D e cis io n in . Will ia mso n v. C it r ix On lin e , 2 01 5

* ).

[278] a.) D. Parnas: Personal Communications, Berlin, 1975. b.) D. Parnas: "Software Fundamentals", ADDISON-WESLEY, 2001.

[279] U SSC : T ra n scr ip t o f it s H ea r in g in C u o zzo o n 2 5 .0 4 .2 01 6* )

[280] M. L e e : Op en in g St at e me nt a t t he Pa te n t Qu a lit y C o mmu n it y Symp o s. U SPT O ' , Ale xa n d r ia , 2 7 .0 4 .2 01 6 [281] U SPT O: "EPQI ", h t t p : / / ww w .u sp t o. g o v/p a te n t/ in it ia t ive s/ e nh a n ced -p at e nt -q ua lit y - in it ia t ive -0 [282] R . Ba h r , U SPT O: " F o rmu la t in g a Su b je c t Ma tt e r Elig ib il i t y R e je ct io n an d Eva lu at in g .. . . .. " , 04 . 05 . 20 1 6

* ).

[283] S. Sch in d le r : "Pro t o t ype De mo n st ra t ion of t he In n o va t io n Expe r t Syst e m", L ESI 2 01 6 , Pe kin g , 1 6 .0 5 .2 0 16 . [284] B. We g n e r : "F ST P – Ma t h . Asse ss. o f an ET C I 's Pra ct ica l/ SPL Qu a lit y" , L ESI 2 01 6 , Pe k in g , 1 6 .0 5 .2 0 16 . [285] D . Sch o en b e rg : "Pre se n ta t io n o f t he I ES Pro t o t ype ", L ESI 2 0 16 , Pe kin g, 16 . 05 . 20 1 6. [286] W. R a u te nb e rg : "Ein f ü h run g in d ie Ma th e ma t isch e L o g ik" , VI EWEG* T EU BN ER , 2 0 08 [287] I SO/ I EC 7 4 98 -1 :1 9 94 ; I n fo rma t io n te ch no lo g y ─ Op en Syst e ms I n t e rcon n e ct ion ─ Ba sic R . M. : ; w ww . iso . o rg [288] N . F u ch s, K. Ka lju ra n d, T . Ku h n: “ At t e mp to Co n t ro lle d En g lish f o r KR ” , U . Bo n n, 20 0 8 [289] C AF C , D e cis io n in TL I , 1 7 .0 5 .2 0 16

* ).

[290] C AF C , D e cis io n in En fi sh, 12 . 05 . 20 1 6* )

. [291] S. Sch in d le r : "En f i sh & T L I : T he C AF C in L in e w it h t h e Su p re me C o u r t 's MBA F ra me w o rk", . 25 . 05 . 20 16

* )

[292] R . Ba h r , U SPT O: MEMOR AN D U M a s t o "R e ce n t Su b je ct Ma tt e r Elig ib il i t y D e cis io n s . . . " , 19 . 05 . 20 1 6* )

. [293] S. Sch in d le r : " MR F , th e Ma st e r R e vie w Fo rm in U SPT O 's EPQI , SPL , a n d th e I ES " , p ub l. 3 0. 0 5. 2 01 6

* ).

[294] U SPT O: "St ra t e g ic I T Pla n fo r F Y 2 01 5 -20 18 ", U SPT O 's h o me pa g e [295]

[296] S. Schindler: "A Com. on the 2016 IEG Update – Suggesting More Scrutiny ", publ. on 09.06.2016 *). [297] U SPT O: " Pa t e n t Pu b lic Ad viso ry C o m. , Qua r t e r ly Me e t in g, I T U p da t e ", 0 5. 0 5. 2 01 6 , U SPT O 's h o me pa g e [298] S. Sch in d le r , U . D ia z, C . N eg ru t iu , D . Sch o e nb e rg, J . Sch u lze , J . Wa ng , B. Weg n e r, R . We t z le r : “ T he U se r I n te r f a ce D e sig n o f I ES f o r T e st in g an ET C I ’s it s Sa t is f y in g SPL – I n c lu d ing Arg u ing Mo d e ” , in p re p. . [299] S. Sch in d le r : "On C on so lid a t ing th e Pre e mp t iv it y an d Ena b le me n t Pro b le ms", in p rep . [300] S. Sch in d le r : "Ep ilo g t o t he Pat e nt -Elig ib il i t y Pro b le m (Pa r t I ) " , 2 0 .0 7 .2 01 6

* )

[301] S. Sch in d le r : "Ep ilo g t o t he Ba sic Pa t en t -Elig ib il i t y Pro b le m (Pa r t I I ) " , pu b l. 1 9 .0 9 . 20 16* )

[302] S. Sch in d le r : "MEMO – Ab st ra ct I d ea s a nd Na t u ra l Phe n o men a a s Se p a ra t e C a u se s o f n PE", in p rep . [303] C AF C , D e cis io n in Je r ich o v. Ax io ma t ics, 1 4 . 03 . 20 16

* ).

[304] C AF C , D e cis io n in Ra p id L it ig a t ion Ma na g e men t v . C e llzd ire ct , 05 . 07 . 20 1 6* )

. [305] E. C h a t lyn ne , „ Th e H ig h Co u r t 's Ar t if ic . An d F ic t it io u s Pat e nt T e st Pa rt 1“ , 0 5. 0 7. 2 01 6 [306] C AF C , D e cis io n In re Ala pp a t, 29 . 07 . 19 9 4

* ).

[307] U SSC , D e cis io n in D ia mo nd v. D ieh r , 0 3 .0 3 .1 9 81* )

. [308] U SSC , Pe t it io n fo r C e rt io ra r i, O I P v. Ama zo n , 1 2. 1 1. 2 01 5

* ).

[309] U SSC , Pe t it io n fo r C e rt io ra r i, Se qu e no m v. Ar io sa , 21 . 03 . 20 1 6* )

. [310] U SSC , Pe t it io n fo r C e rt io ra r i, Je r ich o v. Ax io ma t ics, 1 0 . 0 6. 2 01 6

* ).

[311] C AF C , D e cis io n in Ba sco m v. AT &T , 27 . 6 .2 01 6* )

. [312] R . Ba h r , U SPT O: MEMO a s t o "R e ce n t Su b . Ma t t e r Elig ib il i t y R u lin g s", 1 4. 0 7. 2 01 6 * ). [313] a . ) Wik ip e d ia : "F irs t -o rd e r lo g ic" , b . ) Wik ip e d ia : "Prä d ika te n lo g ik" , c. ) Wik ip e d ia : "An a ly t ic Ph ilo so p h y", d . ) Wik ip e d ia : "D . Pa rn a s".

[314] J. Duffy: "Counterproductive Notice in Literalistic v. Peripheral Claiming", U. of Virginia, June 2016*). [315] J. D u f f y : “ Se ct io n 1 1 2 a nd F un ct io n a l C la imin g ” , FC BA, N a sh vil le , 2 2. 0 6. 2 01 6 . [316] S. Sch in d le r : "MEMO o n Me t a p h ysics vs. R a t io na lit y in SPL Pre ce d en t s ab o ut ET C I s" a lia s o n "Ma t h e ma t ica l C o g n it ion T he o ry b y Fa r Exce e d s H ith e r t o Kn o w led g e R ep re se nt a t ion " , in p re p. [317] R . St o ll: " I nn o vat io n I ssue s in th e Ame r ica s - Su b je ct Ma tt e r Elig ib il i t y " C ASR I P, Se a t t le , 22 . 07 . 20 16 * ) . [318] C AF C , D e cis io n in Ph il ip s v . Z o ll. Me d ica l, 2 8 .0 7 .2 0 16 [319] C AF C , D e cis io n in AGI S v. LI F E3 6 0, 28 . 7. 2 01 6 [320] S. Sch in d le r : “ Mo d e lin g Se man t ics f o r th e ‘In n o vat io n D e scr ip t io n L a ng u ag e , I DL ’ f o r ET C I s” , t h is Me mo , pu b l. 2 0. 0 3. 2 01 7 ,

* ).

[321] S. Sch in d le r : "Ep ilo g t o t he Ba sic Pa t e n t -Elig ib il i t y Pro b le m (Pa r t I I I ) " , in p rep . [322] C AF C , D e cis io n in I n re C SB-Syst e m I n t e rn at io n a l, 0 9. 0 8. 2 01 6 .* ) [323] U SSC , D e cis io n in C uo zzo , 2 0 .0 6 .2 0 16 * ) . [324] P. Su p p e s: "Axio ma t ic Se t T he o ry", D OVER Pu b l. , St a nf o rd , 1 97 2 . [325] P. Su p p e s: Prob a b il is t ic Me t a p h ysics, Ba sil Bla ckw e ll, Oxf o rd a n d N e w Yo rk, 1 98 4 [326] H : Bu rkh a rdt , B. Smit h : "Ha n db o o k o f Me t a ph ysics a n d On to lo g y", Ph ilo so ph ia Ve r la g , Mu n ich , 1 9 91 . [327] G. Qu in n : “U SPT O h a n d lin g o f PI sp a rks su b sta n t. d iscu ss io n at PPAC me e t in g“ , I P Wa t ch do g , 2 4. 0 8. 2 01 6 [328] t b d [329] L AW3 6 0 : D . Ka pp o s: Mod e rn -Da y 1 01 Ca se s Sp e ll T ro ub le F o r AT Ms O f T h e F ut u re , 1 6. 0 8. 2 01 6 [330] M. H o lo u be k: tb d [331] S. Sch in d le r : "A PS t o my Ep ilo g f o r th e PE -Pro b le m (Pa r t I

[3 0 0] & I I

[ 3 01 ]) " , p ub l. 2 2. 0 9. 2 01 6

* )

[332] S. Schindler: "The Notion of Claiming in SPL – pre&post Aufklärung", p. 10.10.2016 *) [333] C AF C , D e cis io n in I n te lle ct u a l Ve n tu re s v . SYMAN T EC , 3 0 .0 9 .2 0 16

* ).

[334] S. Sch in d le r : "T w o Blu ep r in t s f o r R e f in ing th e I EG ’s U p d a te to So lv in g th e PE Pro b le m o r A PS t o my C o m me n t o n Jo hn D uf f y 's Essa y a b o ut "C la imin g " u nd e r 35 U SC "

, pu b l. 0 3 .1 2 .2 0 16* )

..

[335] T. Kuhn: "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions", UCP, 1962, see also Wikipedia [336] EU 's Bio t e ch D ire ct ive [337] EU 's C I I D ire ct ive [338] EU 's En f o rce me n t D ire ct ive [339] EU 's SBC R e g u la t io n [340] S. Sch in d le r : "MEMO: T h e T w o § 10 1 F law s in th e C AF C 's I V D e cis io n , ca u se d b y t he Ph en o me n on of 'Pa ra d ig m Sh if t Pa ra lys is ' in S PL Pre ce d e n t s ab o ut ET C I s", pu b l. 2 6 .1 0 .2 0 16

* ).

[341] D . Ka p po s: "Ge tt in g Pra ct ica l Ab o ut Pa te n t Qu a lit y" , L aw 3 60 , 2 1 .1 0 .2 0 16 [342] J. H e rn do : "Ju st Wh en Yo u T h ou g ht th e C AF C w ou ld So f te n in g … t h e T id e Tu rn s Ag a in ", PAT EN T D OC S

* )

[343] D . At k in s: "F e d e ra l Ju d ge s Sla m A li ce a t Eve nt H on o r in g Ju d ge Wh yte ", L aw 3 60 , 2 0 .1 0 .2 0 16* )

[344] C AF C , D e cis io n in AMD OC S v. OPEN ET T EL EC OM, 0 1 . 1 1. 2 01 6

* ).

[345] R . Ba h r , U SPT O: MEMOR AN D U M a s t o "R e ce n t Su b je ct Ma tt e r Elig ib il i t y D e cis io n s . . . " , 02 . 11 . 20 1 6* )

. [346] S. Sch in d le r : "T h e AMD OC S D isse n t St ir s u p t he Ke y De f ic ie n cy o f t h e C AF C 's p ro -PE A li ce D e cis io n s, th u s sho w in g: T h e T ime is R ip e fo r En d ing t he §1 01 C ha o s! " , p ub . , 1 0. 1 1. 2 01 6

* ).

[347] S. Sch in d le r : " R OU N D T ABL E ON PAT EN T SU BJEC T MAT T ER EL I G I BI L I T Y " , p u b. , 1 4 .1 1 .2 0 16* )

.

[348] B.Wegner: Invited paper, “Innovation, knowledge representation, knowledge management and paper, “Math. Modelling class. math. thinking”, Corfu, Ionian University, 22.11.2016*)

[349] B. Wegner:: Invited paper, ”Robust Claim Interpretation and Claim Construction for an ETCI, - Steps of a “Mathematical Theory of Innovation””, Bangkok, ICMA-MU, 17.-19.12.2016*)

[350] S. Sch in d le r : "T h e I ES Qu a l. Ma ch in e : Pro t ot yp e De mo ", G I PC , New Delhi, 11.-13.01.2017. [351] B. We g n e r : "F ST P – Ma t h . Asse ss. o f ET C I s ’ Qu a lit y" , G I PC , New Delhi, 11.-13.01.2017

* ).

[352] D . Sch o en b e rg : "T he I ES Pro t o t ype Qua lif . Ma ch in e " , G I PC , N New Delhi, 11.-13.01.2017* )

[353] S. Schindler: “The Lesson to be Learned from the US PE Hype:”, publ. 11.12.2016*). [354] S. Schindler: “An Amazing SPL Cogn.: Any Pat. Appli. is Draft. Tot. Rob.”, publ. 31.01.2017*). [355] S. Schindler: “An Ama. SPL Cogn.: Any Pat. Appli. is Draft. Tot. Rob.”, pub.07.03.2017*). [356] S. Sch in d le r : “ An Ama zin g SPL C o gn it io n : An y Pa t en t Ap p lica t ion is D ra f ta b le To t a lly R ob u st , Me mo C” , to be pu b lish e d b y th e e n d o f. 0 4. 2 01 7 . [357] M. K ik l is : “ T h e Sup re me Co u r t o n Pa t en t La w” , Wo lt e rs Klu w e r , 2 0 15 . [358] N . So lo mo m: “ Th e D is in t e g rat io n o f th e Ame r ica n Pa te n t Syst e m ─ Ad ve rse Co n se qu en ce s o f C ou r t De cis io n s” , I PWa t ch d og , 2 6 /2 9 .0 1 .2 0 17 ,

* )

[359] PO ( “ I n te lle ct u a l Pro pe r t y Ow ne rs Asso cia t io n ” ) : “ Pro p o sed Ame n d me nt s t o Pa t e nt Elig ib le Su b je ct Ma tt e r un de r 3 5 U . S. C. § 1 01 ” , 07 . 02 . 20 1 7,* )

[360] I A ( I n t e rn e t Asso cia t io n” ) : “ L et t e r t o th e Pre s id en t -e le ct T ru mp” , 14 . 12 . 20 1 6

* )

[361] J. Straus: „IPRs and Bioeconomy“, Journal of IP Law&Practice, 14.07.2017 [362] U SPT O/ PT A B: Ex p a r t e Sch u lha u se r , 2 0 16 ,

* )

[363] B. Ka t t e h rh e in r ich et a l. : ” Wh a t Schu lh a u se r Me a n s Fo r C on d it . C la im L imit a t io n ” , La w 36 0 , 0 3. 0 2. 2 01 7 * ) [364] S. Sch in d le r : “ T h e PT AB’s S ch u lh a u se r De c. is U nt e na b le” , p ub l. 0 8. 0 3. 2 01 7

* )

[365] R . Ka t zn e lson : “ Ca n t h e Su p re me Co u r t ’s e ro s io n of pa t en t r ig ht s b e re ve rse d?” , I Pdo g , 0 2. 0 3. 2 01 7* )

[366] C AF C , D e cis io n in T VI v . Elb it , 0 8. 0 3. 2 01 7

* ).

[367] P. Michel:.“The Current Patent Landscape in the US&Abroad”, USPTO, 09.-10.03.2017*).

[368] T ra n scr ip t o f[3 6 7 ]

, ? ?. 0 3. 2 01 7 ,* )

[369] P. N e w ma n , d in ne r sp ee ch , 1 2 th APL I , U SPT O, 0 9 . -1 0 .0 3 .2 0 17 . [370] T b d [371] Wikip e d ia a . )“ D SL” , b . )“ Co mp ile r ” , c . )“ BN F” , d. )“An a lyt ic Ph ilo so p h y” , e . )“ Ax io ma t iza t io n” , …

[372] S. Schindler: ‘"IDLs” & KRs, and Easily Drafting&Testing Patents for Robustn.’, pbl., 16.05.2017*) [373] S. Sch in d le r : " I nn o va t ion De scr ip t io n La n gu ag e s, ID L s & Bra in b ra in KR ” , in p re p .

[374] Justice Thomas: Friendly Comment, 04.12.2015 *) [375] J. Ko h , P. T re se me r : “ C lie n t Ale r t o f 1 5 .0 5 .2 0 17” , La t ha m & W a t k in s

* )

[376] AI PL A: “ Le g is la t ive Pro p o sa l a n d R ep o r t On PE Su b je ct Ma t te r” , 12 . 05 . 20 1 7*)

[377] I PO: “ Pro po se d Ame nd me n t s to Pa te n t Elig ib le Su b je ct Ma t t e r” , 0 7. 0 2. 2 01 7* )

[378] se e t he co r re ct re f e re n ce in t he V. 27 o f t he [3 7 2] at t he be lo w U R L , in a f e w d a ys. [379] ABA: L e t t e r b y D . Su ch y t o t h e U SPT O, 2 8 .0 3 .2 0 17

* )

[380] SI PO: Me ssa g e b y H -M T so , J . Yi, 3 1 .0 3 .2 01 7 [381] K. C a n ad y: “ T a ke a Wa lk on th e Bio Sid e: PE o f Bio t e ch n o log ica l I n ve nt io n s” , AI PL A, 1 7 .0 5 .2 0 17

* )

[382] S. Alt e r : “N u t s & Bo lt s of 10 1“ , AI PL A, 1 7 .0 5 .2 0 17* )

[383] B. St o ll: “ 10 1 in t he F ut u re” , AI PL A, 1 7. 0 5. 2 01 7

* )

[384] G. Wisd o m: “ Bu s. Ana l. Ba se d o n Alice (C o n ce de d to be T ot a lly Ab st ra ct ) ” , Micro so f t , 1 7 .0 5 .2 0 17 * ) [385] EF F : “ Co mme n t s R eg a rd ing … Sub je ct Ma t te r Elig ib il i t y ” , 1 8. 0 1. 2 01 7 .

* )

[386] T b d [387] J. D u f f y , C . Ba ys, T. Sich e lma n : “ T he F ut u re o f Pat e nt Ve nu e” , AI PL A 20 17 Sp r in g C o nf e ren ce , 1 8 .0 5 .2 0 17

* )

[388] U SSC , D e cis io n in H ea r t la nd v. Kra ft , 2 2 .0 5 .2 0 17* )

. [389] AI PL A: “ Pa t en t Ven u e St a tu t e is n o t Mod if ie d b y Ge n e ra l Ve n ue St a tu t e” , 22 . 05 . 20 1 7

* )

[390] S. Schindler: “The Recent AIPLA Meeting’s … §101-Guidelines …”, publ., 14.06.2017*) [391] S. Schindler: “ANNEX[391] to[390] ─ Trivializing & Semi-Automat. ETCIs’ SPL-Satisf.-Tests*) [392] S. Sch in d le r : “ The FSTP-Test and the DDR’s ETCI Recon. ─ as Model Case”, in p re p . [393] M. Miro n : ” CC J S. Pro st , C J S. Pla g e r , C J J. R e yn a , C J T . Hu gh e s, C J K. St o ll” , 2 01 7 FC BA, 2 1 .0 6 .2 0 17 . [394] S. Sch in d le r : “ I D L & Kn o w led g e R e p. s ” , IR R P’1 7 , O r lan d o, 08 . -1 1. 0 7. 2 01 7 . [395] S. Sch in d le r : “ I D L & Kn o w led g e R e p. s” , I KE’1 7 , L a s Ve ga s, 17 . -20 . 09 . 20 1 7. [396] S. Sch in d le r : “ I D L & KR s” , GC KE -2 0 1 7 , Q in g da o , 1 9. -2 1 .0 9 .2 01 7 . [397] C AF C , D e cis io n in AR I OSA v. SEQU EN OM, 1 2 . 06 . 20 1 5

* ).

[398] C AF C , Denial on Pet. for Hearing en Banc in. SEQUENOM vs Ariosa, 02.12.2015*). [399] U SSC , Pf C in SEQU EN OM v. AR I OSA, 2 1 . 0 3. 2 01 6* ) . , D ENI ED o n 2 7. 0 6. 2 01 6 .

[400] S. Schindler: “MEMO: Sequenom ─ An Incomplete Interp. of §101/Alice by …”, 17.07.2017*) [401] S. Sch in d le r , t bd : “ Ax io ma t iza t io n o f (no n )Exce p t io na l E - . c rC s” , in p rep . . [402] S. N a ra ya n: “ On t h e Micro Bio me ” , 20 1 7 F C BA C o nf e ren ce , 2 2 .0 6 .2 0 17

* )

[403] P. Je n q , J . Je nq : “ Pa ra l le l Pre d . o f St o ck Vo la t i l i t y ” , WMSC I 2 01 7 , 0 9 .0 7 .2 01 7* )

[404] J. D u f f y : “ T h e U SSC a nd Bio s imila r L it ig a t io n : Amg e n v. Sa n do z” , C ASR I P, 10 . 07 . 17

* )

[405] P. Morris: The Latest Developments in CRISPR-Technology” , CASRI P, 10.07.2017*)

[406] S. Schindler: “The PE-Theorem, FSTP-Test, and the US Innovation Econo. … ’, publ. 01.08.2017*) [407] U SPT O: “ PAT EN T EL I G . SU BJEC T MAT T ER : R EPOR T … ” , 2 5. 0 7. 2 01 7

* )

[408] C . C oo n s, T. C ot t on , D . Du rb in , M. H iro n o: “ St ro ng e r Pa te n t s Act 2 0 17” , 2 1 . 06 . .2 0 17* )

[409] S. Sch in d le r : “ MEMO a b o u t th e § 11 2 Ena b lin g Re qu ire me n t w ith ET C I s” , in p re p. [410] t b d : [411] D. Kolker:“USPTO Guidel. on Subje ct Matter Elig ibil ity” , BCBC P Partnership Meet., 02.08.2017

*)

[412] J. Chambers: “Stakeholders’ Perspect ives on S. M Elig ibil ity” , BCBC P Partner. Meet., 02.08.2017*)

[413] J. C o ha n : “ S. M Elig ib il i t y ” , BC BC P Pa r t n e rsh ip Mee t in g , 0 2. 0 8. 2 01 7

* )

[414] L . F isch e r : “ S. M Elig ib il i t y ” , BC BC P Pa r t n e rsh ip Me et in g , 0 2 .0 8 .2 01 7* )

[415] S. Schindler: “The USPTO’s §101/Biotech WS: Its PE-Test is Too Vague …”, 12.09.2017*) [416] G. N icko l: “ Up da t e o n C a n ce r I mmu n o th e rap y Pro g ra m” , BC BC P Pa r t n e rsh ip Me e t ., 30 . 08 . 20 1 7

* )

[417] D. Nguyen: “WIPO Standard ST.26(Nucleotide and Amino Acid Sequence” , BCBCP, 02.08.2017*)

[418] U SSC Pf C : Syn o p sis [419] U SSC Pf C : Amd o cs [420] C AF C -p e n d ing : Bu rg o s , [421] C AF C . D e cis io n in Vi su a l Me mo ry , 1 5. 0 8. 2 01 7

* )

[422] C. Shannon “A Mathematical Theory of Communication”, 1948. [423] S. Schindler: “The CAFC’s Biotech/PE-Decisions ─ Reconsidered for the R&D-Investor

Community", publ.15.10.2017*) [424] P. Michel: Comment on the BRI and Consistency, at recent Congressional hearing*). [425] N. Kelly, USPTO, 25.09.2015

*)

[426] L. Fischer: “ IP & Diagnostic Symposium“ , Alexandria, 29.09.2017*)

[427] H. Sauer: " IP & Diagnostic Symposium“ , Alexandria, 29.09.2017 [428] W. Woessner: " I P & Diagnostic Symposium“ , Alexandria, 29.09.2017

*)

[429] J. Cohan: “ IP & Diagnostic Symposiu m“ , Alexandria, 29.09.2017 [430] E. Haug: “FCBA Global Ser ies – Euro. 2017 Session” , London, 25.-26.09.2017 [431] L. Coury, M. H. Furman, L. Jakob: “Biologic and Bio similar Lit igation – Recent Developments” , FCBA Bench & Ba r in Dialogue, New York, 4.10.2017 [432] Judge R. Taranto, Judge A. Lourie, Chief Judge S. Prost, Judge J. Reyna: “Discussion with the Judiciary” , FCBA Bench & Bar in Dialogue, New York, 4.10.2017

[433] S. Schindler: "An SPL’s ETCI is ‘Dig.’ iff it is Totally-Rob. ─ Espec. PE.. Oil States", publ. 05.10.2017,*) [434] S. Sch indler: “Getting Famil. with the IES by Test ing its Prototype_V.x, x≥1” , in prep. [435] P. Leahy, IPAS 2017, Intellectual Property Awareness Summit, 06.11.2017, Chicago [436] P. Ludwig, AIPPI 2017, Sydney, Wor ld C., M. Pharma2: Injunctions: innovator vs. innovator, 16.10.2017 [437] J. Lefstin, P. Menell, D. Taylor: “Final Rep. of the Berkeley Center for Law & Tech. Section 101 Workshop: Addressing Patent Eligib il ity Challenge” , Berkeley Tech. Law Journal, 2 018 Forthcoming [438] USSC, Brief of Federal Respondent (USPTO) in Oil States Energ y v. Greene's Energy

*)

[439] R. Rader: Pers. Communication, Chicago, 06.11.2017. [440] S. Sch indler: "The Supre me Court’s ‘Outer Shell’-Specificat ion of an ETCI – Digitizing & Mathematizing It. & The Se mi-Automatic FSTP-Tests by the IES of ETCIs for Sat isfy ing SPL– DDR, Myriad, Sequenom, GTG. & The German SPL-Precedents Imp lies the Supre me Court’s SPL-Fra mework – Po lit ical I ssues.", pub. 20.01.2018

*)

[441] S. Sch indler: "O/ A/E/ M ─- An ETCI’s 4 Use-Hierarchy-Leve ls", in prep. [442] P. Michel: Pe rs. Communicat ion, Alexandr ia, 30.08.2017.

[443] D. Schoenberg, J. Schulze, J. Wang, C.Negrutiu, B. Wegner, R. Wetzler, S. Schindler: "The UI Design of the IES for Testing an ETCI’s Satisfying SPL", 23.01.2018*)

[444] D. Schoenberg, J. Schulze, J. Wang, C.Negrutiu, B. Wegner, R. Wetzler, S. Schind ler, "The IES GUI – A Primer: Using the FSTP-Te st, Inhouse Mode", GIPC, 23.01.2018*)

[445] B. Wegner, “A Mathematical KR Model for C laim Interpretation and Construction“ , 23.01.2018*) [446] R. Stoll (on IP Watchdog): „Director Andrei Iancus Act One“ , 26.11.2017 [447] R. Katznelson: „Private Patent Rights, the Patent Bargain and the Fiction of Adminis trative “Error Correction” in Inter Partes Review s“ , 04.12.2017 [448] H. Goddard, J. Strauss: Pers. Co mmunication, Ber lin, 20.12.2017. [449] S. Sch indler: “………… tbd …………..” , in prep. [450] E. Kandel: “Auf der Suche nach dem Gedächtnis.“ , Random House, 2006. [451] S. El-Metwally, O. Ouda, M. Helmy: “Next Generation Sequencing Technologies and Challenges in Sequence Assembly” , Springer, 2014 [452] CAFC, Decis ion in Fin jan v. Blue Coat Systems, 10.01.2018

*).

[453] S. Schindler: “AI and US & German SPL will Boost R&D-Investments”, publ.19.04.2018*) [454] CAFC, Decis ion in EXER GEN, 08.03.2018

*)

[455] MPEP-2018, 25.01.2018 [456] S. Sch indler: “Short AI Comment on MPEP2018_SECT2106 – NO IMPROVEMENT.” , publ. 26.02.2018

*).

[457] B. Wegner, S. Sch indler, et al.: “Mathematizing & Sequencing Any Ratio nalized ETCI“ , in prep.

[458] S. Schindler: “Comment on the Absurdity of §101 in MPEP-2018_Sect2106.”, 16.03.2018*). [459] S. Schindler: “Andrei Iancu’s Promises of More Certainty in USPTO’s PE-Decisions – Hope- or

Harmful?”, publ. 03.05.2018*) [460] U SSC , D e cis io n in O il St a t e s, 2 4 .0 4 .2 01 8

* )

[461] U SSC , D e cis io n in SAS I N ST I T U T E, 2 4. 0 4. 2 01 8* )

[462] [463] A. I a n cu: St a te me n t b e fo re t h e C o mmit t e e o n t h e Ju d ic ia ry U . S. Se na t e: “ Ove rs ig h t o f th e U . S. Pa te n t a nd T ra de ma rk O f f ice” , 1 8 . 04 . 20 18 [464] M. Borella (PATENT DOCS): “USPTO Updates Patent Eligibility Guidance in View of Berkheimer”, 23.04.2018 [465] J. Ma t a l: Ope n in g Ke yn o te , BI O ’s I PC C 20 18 , Ne w Or le an s, 11 . 04 . 20 1 8. [466] A. I a n cu: “ R o le o f U S Pa t en t Po licy in D o me st ic I n no va t ion an d Po te n t ia l I mp a c t s on I n ve st me n t .” , AmC h a m, 11 . 04 . 20 1 8

* ).

[467] CAFC, Decision in VANDA, 13.04.2018*) [468] S. Schindler: “Andrei Iancu’s Further Pub. Discuss. about USPTO’s Serv.”, publ. 11.05.2018*) [469] USPT O’s N PRM concerning the BRI,

*)

[470] S. Schindler: “USPTO’s Berkheimer PE-Guideline … & A Question – not asked – as to USPTO’s DataBase-Searching for Patent(-Application)s”, REMAKE publ.06.07.2018*)

[471] A. I a n cu: : at th e U SPT O/ APPC me e t in g in Ale xan d r ia , 0 3 .0 5 .2 0 18 [472] J. Manno, K. Parendo: ”Demonstration: USPTO Search Tools’, USPTO, 03.05.2018

*).

[473] A. I a n cu: : at th e AI PL A me e t ing in Sea t t le , 1 5 -1 7 .. 0 5. 2 01 8 . [474] R . Ba h r , U SPT O, MEMOR AN D U M (a s t o Be rkh e ime r ) , 19 . 04 . 20 18

* )

[475] B. Goodlatte, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee: “Goodlatte Statement at USPTO Ove rs ig h t H e a r in g” , 22 . 05 . 20 1 8* )

[476] A. I a n cu: “ Ove rs ig h t o f th e U SPT O” , before the Committee on the Judiciary, US House o f R e p re se nt a t ive s” , 2 2 .0 5 .2 0 18

* )

[477] S. Schindler: “Rationality Returns in the US SPL-Drama – it now has a White Knight.”, 21.06.2018*) [478] A. Iancu: “Remarks delivered at the AEI”, 21.06.2018*) [479] S. Schindler: “Dropping the BRI-Standard is Necessary! But … ”, publ.09.07.2018. [480] S. Schindler: “A Fresh Look at the USPTO’s PE-Guidance ─ …”, publ.19.07.2018. [481] A. I a n cu: “Remarks delivered at the AEI” , 21.06.2018*)

[482] S. Schindler: “Andrei Iancu ─ After 100+ Days Even Stronger on Track.”, publ. 25.07.2018*) [483] S. Schindler: “A PE-Guideline for Anybody ─ Framework-based, Precise, Short, and Simple!!.”, publ. 30.07.2018*) [484] S. Schindler: Sliding Interpretations of AIA-§§ Threaten US Development of Emerging Technologies.

Pertinent Supreme Court’s Decisions Needed for Stabilizing the US NPS.”, publ. 22.08.2018*) [485] S. Schindler: Pers. Communications to Paul Michel, DC, 30.07.2018. [486] B. Mathis III: “No Light at the End of the (Alice) Tunnel. Not Even Close”, IP WATCHDOG, 08.08.2018

*)

[487] S. Ma h a n ta : “ CR I SPR Mo d if ie d C AR T -C e lls Bo ls t e r I mmu n o On co lo g y Arse n a l” , I PWa t ch d og , 2 7 .0 8 .2 0 18

* ).

[488] S. Schindler: “UC’s vs. Broad/MIT/Harvard’s CRISPR Patents & the Supreme Court’s Frame-work”, Part I, publ. 20.09..2018*)

[489] S. Schindler: UC’s vs. Broad/MIT/Harvard’s ….”, Part II, publ. 25.10..2018*) [490] N . . F le min g : “C o mp u te r -ca lcu la t e d C o mp ou nd s” , N AT U R E, 3 1 .0 5 .2 0 18

* ).

[491] USPT O/PT AB: Decis ion in Broad/MIT/Harvard vs UC, 17.02.2017*)

[492] CAFC: Briefs of both parties to the CAFC in Broad/MIT/Harvard vs UC, 25.07./ 25.10.,/ 22.11.2017

*)

[493] CAFC: Decis ion in Broad/MIT/Harvard vs UC, 10.09.2018*)

[494] K. Noonan: “CAFC Approves PTAB as to CRISPR Interference”, PATENTDOCS, 10.09.2018

*)..

[495] S. Schindler, B. Wittig: ”UC’s vs. Broad’s CRISPR Patents …”, Part III, publ. 30.01.2019*) [496] WIPO: IP Handbook, Chap. 7 & Admin. Instruct ions – Ann. C, 2

nd Ed. 2004, Reprint 2008

*)

[497] USPTO: MPEP Chapter 2400 Biotechnology, Last Revised Jan. 2018*)

[498] EPO: EPC, Chapter V, 16th edition/June 2016 and DIRECTIVE 98-44-EC, 6. 7.1998

*)

[499] US CONGRESS: H.R.5340 - STRONGER Patents Act of 2018 (Bill) *)

[500] S. Schindler: “Andrei Iancu’s § 101 Challenge ─ Becoming his § 101 Success Story? The USPTO’s Recent Claim Interpretation May Render Alice’s § 101 Test As Patent Champion.”, 14.11.2018*)

[501] G. Findlay: "Accurate Classification of BRCA1 Variants with Saturation Genome Editing.", Springer Nature Limited, publ. 12.09.2018*).

[502] P. Akcakaya: "In v ivo CRISPR editing with no detectable genome ─ wide off-target mutations", Springer Nature Limited, publ. 12.09.2018*).

[503] S. Schindler, B. Wittig: ”UC’s vs. Broad’s …. ”, Part IV,. 18.03.2019 [504] USPTO: The 2019 §§ 101&112 Guidelines, 04.01.2019 *) [505] t b d [506] t b d [507] t b d

[508] B. Wittig, S. Schindler: “UC’s vs. Broad/MIT/Harvard’s CRISPR Patents & the Supreme Court’s Framework ─ Graphical Support in (M)BIOETCI Specification’, Part V”, , to be pub. In Q2/2019.

[509] S. Sch indler: “Cutting Edge AI Enables the Innovation Expert Syste m, ‘IES’, to Fra mework-Based Solving the PE-Prob lem for any ETCI” , Corporate IP Counsel, 28-29.03.2019, NY*)

,

[510] S. Schindler: “Finally, CAFC & USPTO Started Friendly ….! One Year of Andrei Iancu’s Spirit in the USPTO ─ and All US Legal Patent-Business is of Good-Will.”, publ. 05.03.2019.*)

[511] CAFC, Decision in Athena, 06.02.2019*) [512] G.Quinn: “Why the CAFC is to Blame ..”, IPWATCHDOG, 25.02.2019 *) [513] A. Iancu: ’Opening Remarks of 14. APLI’, USPTO, 21.03.2019. [514] R. Taylor, USPTO, 21.03.2019.. [515] R. Taylor, see*) [516] D. Reardon, G. Quinn: „Alice is Due for Reversal: Science Proves Its Reasoning Unsound”, 21.03.2019*) [517] D. Carleton: “Showing ‘Meaningful Limits’ in Patent Claims”, 19.03.2019*) [518] A.Iancu: “Fire Side Chat about the PE-Problem”, Arlington, ABA-IPL, 11.04.2019 [519] B. Stoll: “Courts Can Resolve Patent Eligibility Problems, Iancu Says”, ABA-IPL, 12.04.2019*). [520] S. Schindler::“Andrei Iancu Will Resolve the PE-Problem as Required by Incentivizing

Innovation”, ABA-IPL, 21.04.2019*) [521] W. Stegmüller : “Unvollständigkeit und Unentscheidbarkeit: "Die Metamathematischen Resultate

von Gödel, Church, Kleene, Rosser und ihre Erkenntnistheoretische Bedeutung", 1973, Springer. [522] CAFC, Decision in Athena v. Mayo, 06.02.2019*) [523] USSC: PfC in Berkheimer*) [524] USSC: PfC in Hikma*) [525] CAFC, Decision in Cleveland v. True Health,, 06.02.2019*) [526] S. Schindler: “The Congress’s New § 101 Initiative Accelerates Consolidating & Improving the PE

Notion Vastly Agreed”, this mail, publ.15.05.2019*) [527] T. Tillis, C.Coons, D. Collins, H. Johnson, S. Stivers: “Press Release”, publ. 17.04.2019*) [528] J. Nurton: “Iancu Calls on CAFC to Fix Sect. 101 Problem”, IP WHATCHDOG, 02.05.2019 *), [529] G. Quinn: “Iancu: PTO Guidance Gets 101 Right; Time for Courts to Follow Suit”, IP WDOG, 07.05.2019*) [530] A. Iancu: “Statement delivered before the US House Subcommittee on Courts, IP, and the

Internet Committee on the Judiciary”, DC, 09.05.2019 *) [531] M. Marello: „Urge the Drafters of the New Section 101 to Support Inventor-Friendly Reform”, IP

WHATCHDOG, 13.05.2019*), [532] W. Rautenberg: “Einführung in die Mathematische Logik.“, 2008, Springer.. [533] R. Alexy: „Theorie der juristischen Argumentation“, 2019, Suhrkamp. [534] tbd [535] tbd [536] S. Schindler::”The Congressional Committee’s PE Initiative Basically Confirms USPTO’s 2019

PE-Guideline ─ Yet the Latter’s Vastly Agreed § 101 Meaning Requires Further Specificity for being PE[526] ─”, publ. 30.05.2019*)

*) docs & complete Ref. List on www.FSTP-expert-system.com