6 : motivating the project coalition
DESCRIPTION
6 : Motivating the Project Coalition. There are so many advisors and sub-advisors involved in the [channel fixed link] project that I hate to think of the amount of paperwork being produced. One thing is for sure, none of them are digging a tunnel The Sunday Times. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
III : Mobilising the Resource Base 1© Graham M Winch
6 : Motivating the Project Coalition
There are so many advisors and sub-advisors involved in the [channel fixed link] project that
I hate to think of the amount of paperwork being produced. One thing is for sure, none
of them are digging a tunnelThe Sunday Times
III : Mobilising the Resource Base 2© Graham M Winch
Motivating the Project Coalition
• the problem of moral hazard• the problem of switching costs• managing moral hazard• contractual uncertainty and risk allocation• the dynamic of adversarial relations• alliancing
III : Mobilising the Resource Base 3© Graham M Winch
The Problem of Moral Hazard
• suppliers do not share information– impacted information
• buyers cannot monitor quality• performance measurement problems• uncertainties regarding facility exploitation
– possible mission changes
• the role of complex contracts– standard forms and economising on transaction
costs
III : Mobilising the Resource Base 4© Graham M Winch
The Problem of Switching Costs
• the fundamental transformation– pre- and post-contract asset specificity– supplier flexibility and client lock-in
• the sources of switching costs– transaction costs of retendering– inability to recover losses from new supplier– litigation– risk premium charged by new supplier
• the opportunistic margin– the cap of client switching costs
III : Mobilising the Resource Base 5© Graham M Winch
Managing Moral Hazard : The Role of Complex Contracts
• specify adjustment conditions• specify authority systems• provide incentives• provide administered pricing systems• provide conflict resolution procedures• specify standardised operating procedures• post credible commitments• provide for supplier performance measurement
III : Mobilising the Resource Base 6© Graham M Winch
Contractual Uncertainty and Risk Allocation
• three options– fee-based contracts– fixed-price contracts– incentive contracts
• incentive contracts : requirements• responsibility for changes in specification
III : Mobilising the Resource Base 7© Graham M Winch
Incentive Contracts : Requirements
• benefit greater than cost of incentive• drivers of performance in the control of the
motivated actor• rewards from consummate performance
greater than penalties from perfunctory performance
• gains and losses accurately measurable• benefits greater than costs of measurement• an incentive contract
8© Graham M Winch
Incentive Contract with GMP
client’s savings
ACO> ACe
gain (i.e. negative variance)
loss (i.e. positive variance)
budget sanction (ACe)
ACO < ACe
contractor’s rewards
contractor’s
risk
client’s risk
GMP
III : Mobilising the Resource Base 9© Graham M Winch
Gainshare: Schedule Incentive Scheme
late
target date
early
gai
nsh
are
(£
)
time (days)
cap
10© Graham M Winch
The Andrew Gainshare Formula
BP’s savings 46%
ACO> ACe
gain (i.e. negative variance)
loss (i.e. positive variance)
budget sanction (Ace = £373m)
GML
ACO < ACe
contractor’s
rewards 54%
contractor’s risk £27m
client’s risk
III : Mobilising the Resource Base 11© Graham M Winch
Responsibility for Changes in Specification
• client responsibility• supplier responsibility• the contractual options
– cost reimbursable– percentage fee– guaranteed maximum loss– pure incentive contract– guaranteed maximum price– unit rate– lump sum
12© Graham M Winch
Responsibility for Changes in the Specification
cost
reim
burs
able
perc
enta
ge fe
e
guar
ante
ed m
axim
um lia
bility
incen
tive
cont
ract
guar
ante
ed m
axim
um p
rice
unit r
ate
lump
sum
level of uncertainty at
contract formation
supplier responsibility
clientresponsibility
fee
-bas
ed
incen
tive
cont
ract
fixed
pric
e
III : Mobilising the Resource Base 13© Graham M Winch
Governing the Contract and the Role of Third Parties
• transaction costs– search costs (15%-20% adverse selection)– costs of preparing and agreeing contract with
selected supplier– costs of dispute resolution– costs of hiring third parties
• the role of third parties
10%
III : Mobilising the Resource Base 14© Graham M Winch
Principal, Agent and Third Party In the Professional System
principal (client)
principal (client)
agent (architect/engineer)
control (architect/engineer)
agent (contractor)
project definition
project execution
III : Mobilising the Resource Base 15© Graham M Winch
The Role of Third Parties
• measurement of supplier achievement• speedy adjustment of minor changes• first line of dispute resolution• trading in probity
– principal quantity surveyor– bureau de contrôle– supervising officer/the engineer
• the professional institutions
III : Mobilising the Resource Base 16© Graham M Winch
The Dynamic of Adversarial Relations
• the dynamic of adversarial relations– getting the best deal– generating transaction costs– cost control, not cost reduction
• the dynamic of over-engineering– responsibility for design– lack of expertise in site processes– add in safety margin
• the dynamic
17© Graham M Winch
The Dynamic of Adversarial Relations and Over-Engineering
competitivetendering
trimmargins
opportunisticbehaviour
audit &control
adversarialrelations
completespecification
responsibilityfor design
avoidlitigation
over-engineer
client
client
III : Mobilising the Resource Base 18© Graham M Winch
Alliancing
• single project partnering• sharing information• sharing risks• motivating performance
– incentive contracts