6.0 synthesis and options...6.1 facilities master plan college of engineering | uw-madison)odg...
TRANSCRIPT
Page6.1
Facilities Master PlanCollege of Engineering | UW-Madison
6.0
Synthesis and Options
6.1 Distillation of Analysis/Gap Analysis
•
•
•
Synthesis and Options continuedPage 6.2
Figure 6A.
Page6.3
SHORT - TERM MID - TERM LONG - TERM
Re-assignment of space to address deficits / surpluses- Renovation
Additions to Existing Structures
- Additional Space
New Structures
- Location(s) - CoE- Replacement Cost
Long-Term Plan
- Vision/Strategic Plan AlignmentRenovation
- Densification
Highest & Best Use –Assess current use:A Continued Use &
Additional Space- Deficit “Impact”- Implications for Site Access
- Feasibility
Replacement Cost- Enabling Cost- Potential Space
Available- Deficit Solution(s)
Plan Alignment- Balanced Utilization- Quality of CoE
Campus- Improved CampusA. Continued Use &
InvestmentB. Alternative Use &
InvestmentC Duration of
y ( )
- AlternativeFacilities / Locations (offsite)
p pSystems
- UW Campus Master Plan Integration
C. Duration of Current Use
D. Duration of Alternative Use
Figure 6A: Multi-Step Approach to Address Gap Analysis
6.2 Planning Variables
1. The anticipated number of undergraduate students.
2. The preferred ratio of 20 undergraduates to each T/TT faculty.
3. The continued ability of existing space to meet functional requirements.
Synthesis and Options continuedPage 6.4
6.1 Distillation of Analysis/Gap Analysis
Figure 6B
5,000 5,550 6,000
24:1 209 230 250
22:1 228 250 270
20:1 250 275 300
Number of Undergraduates
Ratio
Number of T/TT Faculty
Figure 6B: Undergraduate to T/TT Faculty Ratios
Figure 6C
Department
726,530825,988
897,451969,248
1,014,391
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
209 T/TT5,000 @ 24:1
230 T/TT5,000 @ 22:15,500 @ 24:1
250 T/TT5,000 @ 20:15,500 @ 22:16,000 @ 24:1
270 T/TT5,500 @ 20:16,000 @ 22:1
300 T/TT6,000 @ 20:1
TotalA
SFRe
quire
d
1 Existing ASF not including Water Science Building2 Current faculty number is 181
2
1
Figure 6C: Number of Faculty to ASF
Page6.5
Figure 6D
6.3.2 Mid to Long Term: New Construction Options
Undergrad / Ratio T/TT Faculty Projected ASF Projected GSF 1
5,000 @ 24:1 209 T/TT 752,439 1,254,065
5,000 @ 22:15,500 @ 24:1 230 T/TT 825,988 1,376,647
5,000 @ 20:15,500 @ 22:16,000 @ 24:1
250 T/TT897,451 1,495,752
5,500 @ 20:16,000 @ 22:1 270 T/TT 969,248 1,615,413
6,000 @ 20:1 300 T/TT 1,014,391 1,690,652
1Assumes 60% efficiency for grossing factor
Figure 6D: Projected GSF Relative to Undergrad/Faculty Ratios
6.3 Options
6.3.1 Short to Mid-term Strategies: Renovation Options
Synthesis and Options continuedPage 6.6
6.3.1.1 1410 Engineering Drive
Building Condition/Usage Summary
Potential Short-Term Strategies
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Page6.7
2
3
4
5
Figure 6E: 1410 Engineering Drive - Key to Potential Strategies
Synthesis and Options continuedPage 6.8
6.3.1.2 Engineering Research Building (ERB)
Building Condition/Usage Summary
Potential Short-Term Strategies
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Page6.9
6.3.1.3 Materials Science and Engineering Building
Building Condition/Usage Summary
Potential Short to Mid-Term Strategies1.
2.
3.
3 1
2
Figure 6F: Materials Science Building - Key to Potential Strategies
Synthesis and Options continuedPage 6.10
6.3.1.4 Engineering Hall
Building Condition/Usage Summary
Potential Short to Mid-Term Strategies
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Page6.11
2
7
8
4,6
3
Figure 6G: Engineering Hall - Key to Potential Strategies (First Floor)
1
4,67
Figure 6H: Engineering Hall - Key to Potential Strategies (Second Floor)
Synthesis and Options continuedPage 6.12
6.3.1.5 Wendt Commons
Building Condition/Usage Summary
Potential Short to Mid-Term Strategies1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Figure 6I: Wendt Commons - Key to Potential Strategies
15
Page6.13
6.3.1.6 Water Science and Engineering Laboratory
Building Condition/Usage Summary
Short to Mid-Term Strategies
6.3.1.7 Mechanical Engineering Building (ME)
Building Condition/Usage Summary
Potential Short to Mid-Term Strategies1.
2.
3.
Synthesis and Options continuedPage 6.14
6.3.1.8 Engineering Centers Building (ECB)
Building Condition/Usage Summary
Potential Short Term Strategies
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Page6.15
1
5
23
6
Figure 6J: Engineering Center Building - Key to Short-Term Strategies
Synthesis and Options continuedPage 6.16
6.3.2 Mid to Long Term: New Construction Options
5
23
5Offsite
446
8
6
1
7
6
Figure 6K: Options Evaluated
1.
Page6.17
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Synthesis and Options continuedPage 6.18
7.
8.