[60]fullerene-based monolayers as neuroprotective biocompatible hybrid materials
TRANSCRIPT
Dow
nloa
ded
by M
cGill
Uni
vers
ity o
n 21
/04/
2013
18:
12:4
5.
Publ
ishe
d on
24
Aug
ust 2
011
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C1C
C13
971A
View Article Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 10617–10619 10617
Cite this: Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 10617–10619
[60]Fullerene-based monolayers as neuroprotective biocompatible hybrid
materialswzDavide Giust,
aJose Luis Albasanz,
aMairena Martın,
aRiccardo Marega,
bArnaud Delforge
b
and Davide Bonifazi*bc
Received 3rd July 2011, Accepted 27th July 2011
DOI: 10.1039/c1cc13971a
Here we report on the surface immobilization of redox-active
[60]fullerene derivatives and the consequent neuroprotective
effects toward L-glutamate induced excitotoxicity in human
derived undifferentiated neuroblastoma cells.
Due to their unique electrochemical and photophysical
properties,1 [60]fullerene and its derivatives have been increasingly
investigated in the last few years as functional building blocks to
prepare tailored covalent2 and self-assembled3 functional
materials, some displaying great potentials in biological
applications4 such as DNA photocleavage5 and sensors
(glucose, ascorbic acid, coenzymes, proteins, or nucleic acids).6
Among others, [60]fullerene and its derivatives displayed
excellent efficiency in eliminating various reactive oxygen
species (ROS) such as superoxide radical anion (O2��),
hydroxyperoxides (ROOH), and hydroxyl radical (�OH).7 In
particular, ROS are generated in cells during oxidative stress
and play critical roles in ischemic stroke and in post-traumatic
lesions, epileptic convulsions, and in other neurodegenerative
diseases through excitotoxicity,8 such as multiple and amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases.9 In
this respect, water-soluble [60]fullerene derivatives,10 such as
hydroxylated and carboxylated conjugates,11 have shown to
efficiently scavenge free radicals in physiological solutions,
displaying neuroprotective effects,12 rapidly preventing neuronal
cells death induced by high concentrations of excitotoxins.13 On the
other hand, it has been shown that under mild irradiation
conditions (B1 mW) methano[60]fullerene-derived hexacarboxylic
acids can induce irreversible damages on cytoplasmic and
mitochondrial membranes in a dose and time-dependent
manner.14 Additionally, it is well known that freely diffusing
[60]fullerene and its derivatives can also elicit toxic responses15
in both in vitro16 and in vivo17 studies. Predictive computational
studies performed on 1207 protein entries (drug target database,
PDTD) have shown that [60]fullerene can interact with
hundreds of human proteins,18 thus potentially leading to a
series of unpredictable ‘‘off-target’’ side effects.
With the aim to undertake all these limitations deriving from
freely-diffusing [60]fullerene-based drugs, in this communication
we report on the preparation of neuroprotective hybrid materials
in which the [60]fullerene molecular cages are confined on a
surface as self-assembled19 monolayers (SAMs). Two [60]fullerene
derivatives bearing a C-unsubstituted pyrrolidine linkage (1H)
and a ferrocenyl side group (Fc, 2H) were synthesized (Fig. S1,
ESIz) and utilized for the preparation of the [60]fullerene-
bearing SAMs on Au(111)-coated mica substrates. The
presence of the Fc moiety on the one hand facilitates the SAM
characterization through X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
(XPS), and on the other could be exploited for light-driven
therapeutics. Unprecedentedly, both [60]fullerene-based SAMs
provided near-complete protection (preserving most of the
characteristics from the parental differentiated20 human neuronal
cells) of the SH-SY5Y cells exposed to excitotoxic levels of
L-Glutamate (L-Glu).21
The two [60]fullerene derivatives bearing thiol anchoring groups
were synthesized through [1,3]-dipolar cycloaddition of azomethine
ylides to C60 following the well-known literature protocol22 and
further modified through amidation/deprotection reactions for
their covalent derivatization with a terminal thiol anchoring
append (Fig. S1, ESIz). Both pyrrolidino[60]fullerene derivatives
1H and 2H were thus adsorbed on Au(111)-coated mica surfaces
following the classical SAMs preparative methodology23 via wet
adsorption from CH2Cl2 solutions (see ESIz, S2), affording SAMs
[1�Au(111)] and [2�Au(111)] as depicted in Scheme 1.
With the aim to elucidate the chemical composition of
the prepared monolayers, XPS was employed as the first
characterization technique. XPS survey scans (see ESIz, S3)of both [1�Au(111)] and [2�Au(111)] monolayers revealed the
presence of peaks belonging to photoelectrons emitted by the
Au(111) surface (Au 4f at B83 eV, Au 5p and 5d in the region
from 0 and 70 eV and Au 4d at B333 eV) and by the
[60]fullerene-containing organic layers (C 1s at B284 eV, N 1
at B399 eV, O 1s at B532 eV and S 2p at B163 eV).
As expected, Fe signals (Fe 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 at B719 eV and
B707 eV, respectively) have been observed only for the
ferrocenyl-containing [2�Au(111)] monolayer.
aDepartment of Inorganic, Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry,University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avenida de Camilo Jose Cela 10,Ciudad Real, 13071, Spain
bDepartment of Chemistry, University of Namur, Rue Bruxelles 61,Namur, 5000, Belgium. E-mail: [email protected]
cDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Chemical Sciences and INSTMUdR Trieste, Universita degli Studi di Trieste, Piazzale Europa 1,Trieste, Italyw This article is part of the ChemComm ‘Molecule-based surfacechemistry’ web themed issue.z Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI:10.1039/c1cc13971a
ChemComm Dynamic Article Links
www.rsc.org/chemcomm COMMUNICATION
Dow
nloa
ded
by M
cGill
Uni
vers
ity o
n 21
/04/
2013
18:
12:4
5.
Publ
ishe
d on
24
Aug
ust 2
011
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C1C
C13
971A
View Article Online
10618 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 10617–10619 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
A high-resolution C 1s core level spectrum (see ESIz, S3-1and S3-2) allowed distinguishing between the different carbon
atom species present in the organic layer of both [1�Au(111)]and [2�Au(111)] monolayers as five main components: (i) a main
peak atB284.5 eV (78.32% and 81.60% respectively) originated
by the photoelectrons emitted from the sp2-hybridized carbon
atoms belonging to the [60]fullerene moiety; (ii) a peak
centered at B285.4 eV (6.96% and 3.54% respectively)
attributed to the sp3-hybridized carbon atoms of both the
aliphatic chain and the N-pyrrolidino moiety; (iii) a component
localized at B286.4 eV (4.09% and 1.57% respectively)
assigned to the oxidized carbon atoms in both C–O and
C–N single bonds; (iv) a peak at B287.6 eV (7.07% and
8.50% respectively) related to photoelectrons emitted from
carbon atoms by oxidized carbons belonging to carbonyl
groups and (v) a component localized at 290 eV (3.57% and
4.79% respectively) related to the carbon atoms belonging to
acidic and amidic functionalities (see ESIz, S3-3 and S3-4).
The degree of the bare Au(111) surface coverage towards
fullerenes SAMs was then assessed throughWCAmeasurements
on different portions (5 or 7) of the prepared surfaces, and
compared to the reference compound CH3(CH2)11SH (see
ESIz, S4). The contact angle between water and cleaned bare
Au(111) surface (38.9 � 2.91) suggests a low-hydrophobic
surface, while after the formation of the fullerene-containing SAMs
the WCA average values significantly increase to 77.1 � 3.01 and
84.4 � 1.91 for monolayers [1�Au(111)] and [2�Au(111)],respectively, a difference mainly ascribed to the Fc group. These
contact angles well match with the values reported in the literature
for closely-packed and organized thin film of fullerene-containing
SAMs on metallic surfaces such as Au5,24 and Hg.25
The biocompatibility and neuroprotective properties were
determined using SH-SY5Y cells (see ESIz, S5) grown for 48 h
under standard conditions (dark, humidified atmosphere with
5% CO2 at 37 1C) on both monolayer substrates [1�Au(111)]and [2�Au(111)]. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images
showed no evident morphological differences between cells
grown on a Petri dish, used as control, and those grown on the
[60]fullerene-containing SAMs (see ESIz, S6). In order to
investigate the monolayer neuroprotective activity, SH-SY5Y
cells grown on hybrid materials [1�Au(111)] and [2�Au(111)]were exposed for 6 h to an excitotoxic concentration (100 mM)
of L-Glu. Results from the MTT viability assay (Fig. 1) showed
how both SAMs [1�Au(111)] and [2�Au(111)] significantly
protected SH-SY5Y cells (B25% loss of cell viability) from
apoptotic events. This is a dramatic enhancement in the cell
viability as compared to the result obtained with the same cells
grown on a normal Petri dish or a cleaned Au (111) surface
exposed to the same treatment, which determined extreme loss
of viable cells (B70%, Fig. 1). We further confirmed the
biocompatibility of the fullerene-containing SAMs by growing
a population of fully-differentiated human neuronal cells. This
is of relevance because the crucial role of substrates in cell
differentiation was extensively investigated toward medical
applications, such as tissues regeneration, implants and stem cells
differentiation.26 Thus, upon treatment of the undifferentiated
SH-SY5Y cells grown on both [1�Au(111)] and [2�Au(111)]with all-trans retinoic acid (10 mM) for 7 days, followed by
administration of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)
(50 ng mL�1) for 3 days, a fully differentiated population of
human neuron-like cells with complete neurite networks, as
shown by SEM imaging (Fig. 2b and c), was obtained. As it
clearly appears in the SEM microscopy images reported in
Fig. 2, no morphological differences were observed between
SH-SY5Y differentiated on a lysine-coated Petri dish, standard
non-neuroprotective substrate for cell attachment,27 and those
on SAMs [1�Au(111)] and [2�Au(111)]. This ultimately confirms the
biocompatibility toward neuronal cells of both fullerene-containing
SAMs, thus making them promising substrates as implanting
materials. Notably, in both biocompatibility and viability tests
no significant differences have been observed between
substrates [1�Au(111)] and [2�Au(111)], thus confirming the
biological inertness of the ferrocenyl moiety.
In conclusion, modification of Au(111) surfaces bearing
pyrrolidino-[60]fullerene derivatives led to bioactive materials
displaying full biocompatibility and neuroprotective actions in
contrasting L-Glu-induced excitotoxicity. In addition, the
Scheme 1 Schematic representation of SAMs [1�Au(111)] and
[2�Au(111)] as obtained by classical thiol adsorption on Au(111).Fig. 1 MTT viability assay performed on undifferentiated SH-SY5Y
cells grown on different substrates and exposed to a 100 mM solution
of L-Glu for 6 h. Viability of undifferentiated SH-SY5Y cells grown on
a standard Petri dish (white), a bare Au(111) surface (black),
[1�Au(111)] (light grey) and [2�Au(111)] (dark grey). **p o 0.01
significantly different from survival values of cells exposed to
L-Glutamate on a Petri dish and bare Au(111) substrates. The dotted
line represents 100% of living cells after 48 h growth on a Petri dish or
a bare Au(111) surface in the absence of L-Glutamate.
Dow
nloa
ded
by M
cGill
Uni
vers
ity o
n 21
/04/
2013
18:
12:4
5.
Publ
ishe
d on
24
Aug
ust 2
011
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C1C
C13
971A
View Article Online
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 10617–10619 10619
same SAMs revealed to be fully compatible materials for the
differentiation of SH-SY5Y cells into neurons, thus representing
novel nanomaterials for neuronal regeneration in damaged
tissues as in the case of ischemia. Furthermore, the possibility
of introducing lateral photoactive appends open the way to
possible devices in which a therapeutic effect, e.g. photodynamic
therapy exploiting porphyrin derivatives, can be induced
through an external stimulus such as light. These hybrid
materials represent only the initial step of an increasing effort
aimed at the design and engineering of further fullerene-based
SAMs which possess all characteristics for applications as
in vivo implants with controlled biocompatibility and bioactive
(therapeutic and/or protective) properties.
This work was supported by the EU through the MC-RTN
‘‘PRAIRIES’’ (035810), the FNRS (FRFC contract no.
2.4.550.09 and 2.4.617.07.F and MIS no. F.4.505.10.F), the
‘‘Loterie Nationale’’, the ‘TINTIN’ ARC project (contract no.
09/14-023), the University of Namur, the Fundacio La Marato
de TV3 (090331), and the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion
(BFU2008-00138). AD and RM thank the FRS-FNRS for the
FRIA doctoral and post-doctoral fellowships, respectively.
Notes and references
1 L. Echegoyen and L. E. Echegoyen, Acc. Chem. Res., 1998,31, 593; D. M. Guldi andM. Prato, Acc. Chem. Res., 2000, 33, 695.
2 A.Mateo-Alonso,D. Bonifazi andM. Prato, inCarbonNanotechnology.Recent Developments in Chemistry, Physics, Materials Science andDevice Applications, ed. L. M. Dai, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006, pp. 155.
3 F. Diederich and M. Gomez-Lopez, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1999, 28, 263;J. F. Nierengarten, Chem. Eur. J., 2000, 6, 3667; J. F. Nierengarten,in Dendrimers V: Functional and Hyperbranched Building Blocks,Photophysical Properties, Applications in Materials and LifeSciences, Springer-Verlag Berlin, Berlin, 2003, vol. 228, pp. 87;J. F. Nierengarten, New J. Chem., 2004, 28, 1177; T. Nakanishi,Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 3425.
4 F. Cataldo and T. da Ros,Medicinal Chemistry and PharmacologicalPotential of Fullerenes and Carbon Nanotubes, Springer, Dordrecht,2011; R. Partha and J. L. Conyers, Int. J. Nanomed., 2009, 4, 261;G. D. Nielsen, M. Roursgaard, K. A. Jensen, S. S. Poulsen andS. T. Larsen, Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 2008, 103, 197;M. Satoh and I. Takayanag, J. Pharmacol. Sci., 2006, 100, 513;D. Pantarotto, N. Tagmatarchis, A. Bianco andM. Prato,Mini-Rev.Med. Chem., 2004, 4, 805; S. Bosi, T. Da Ros, G. Spalluto andM. Prato, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2003, 38, 913.
5 N. Higashi, T. Inoue and M. Niwa, Chem. Commun., 1997, 1507.6 B. S. Sherigara, W. Kutner and F. D’Souza, Electroanalysis, 2003,15, 753; F. Patolsky, G. L. Tao, E. Katz and I. Willner,J. Electroanal. Chem., 1998, 454, 9; C. Fang and X. Y. Zhou,Electroanalysis, 2001, 13, 949.
7 L. Y. Chiang, F. J. Lu and J. T. Lin, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.Commun., 1995, 1283.
8 A. Karakoti, S. Singh, J. M. Dowding, S. Seal and W. T. Self,Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 4422.
9 X. X. Dong, Y. Wang and Z. H. Qin, Acta Pharmacol. Sin., 2009,30, 379.
10 A. Mateo-Alonso, C. Sooambar and M. Prato, Org. Biomol.Chem., 2006, 4, 1629.
11 E. Nakamura and H. Isobe, Acc. Chem. Res., 2003, 36, 807.12 T. Chen, Y. Y. Li, J. L. Zhang, B. Xu, Y. Lin, C. X. Wang,
W. C. Guan, Y. J. Wang and S. Q. Xu, J. Appl. Toxicol., 2011,31, 255; J. Tong, M. C. Zimmerman, S. M. Li, X. Yi,R. Luxenhofer, R. Jordan and A. V. Kabanov, Biomaterials,2011, 32, 3654; S. S. Ali, J. I. Hardt and L. L. Dugan,Nanomedicine, 2008, 4, 283; H. Jin, W. Q. Chen, X. W. Tang,L. Y. Chiang, C. Y. Yang, J. V. Schloss and J. Y. Wu, J. Neurosci.Res., 2000, 62, 600.
13 L. L. Dugan, D. M. Turetsky, C. Du, D. Lobner, M. Wheeler,C. R. Almli, C. K. F. Shen, T. Y. Luh, D. W. Choi and T. S. Lin,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1997, 94, 9434; A. M. Y. Lin,C. H. Yang, Y. F. Ueng, T. Y. Luh, T. Y. Liu, Y. P. Lay andL. T. Ho, Neurochem. Int., 2004, 44, 99; X. Q. Cai, H. Q. Jia,Z. B. Liu, B. Hou, C. Luo, Z. H. Feng, W. X. Li and J. K. Liu,J. Neurosci. Res., 2008, 86, 3622.
14 X. L. Yang, L. Chen, X. Qiao and C. H. Fan, Int. J. Toxicol., 2007,26, 197.
15 K. Aschberger, H. J. Johnston, V. Stone, R. J. Aitken, C. L. Tran,S. M. Hankin, S. A. K. Peters and F. M. Christensen, Regul.Toxicol. Pharmacol., 2010, 58, 455; H. J. Johnston,G. R. Hutchison, F. M. Christensen, K. Aschberger andV. Stone, Toxicol. Sci., 2010, 114, 162.
16 B. Han and M. N. Karim, Scanning, 2008, 30, 213; H. Yamawakiand N. Iwai, Am. J. Physiol.: Cell Physiol., 2006, 290, C1495;G. Jia, H. F. Wang, L. Yan, X. Wang, R. J. Pei, T. Yan,Y. L. Zhao and X. B. Guo, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2005,39, 1378; H. Kato, N. Shinohara, A. Nakamura, M. Horie,K. Fujita, K. Takahashi, H. Iwahashi, S. Endoh andS. Kinugasa, Mol. BioSyst., 2010, 6, 1238; L. W. Zhang,J. Z. Yang, A. R. Barron and N. A. Monteiro-Riviere, Toxicol.Lett., 2009, 191, 149.
17 K. T. Kim, M. H. Jang, J. Y. Kim and S. D. Kim, Sci. TotalEnviron., 2010, 408, 5606; T. M. Blickley and P. McClellan-Green,Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 2008, 27, 1964; C. Y. Usenko,S. L. Harper and R. L. Tanguay, Carbon, 2007, 45, 1891;S. Q. Zhu, E. Oberdorster and M. L. Haasch, Mar. Environ.Res., 2006, 62, S5; S. Yamago, H. Tokuyama, E. Nakamura,K. Kikuchi, S. Kananishi, K. Sueki, H. Nakahara, S. Enomotoand F. Ambe, Chem. Biol., 1995, 2, 385.
18 M. Calvaresi and F. Zerbetto, ACS Nano, 2010, 4, 2283.19 C. A. Mirkin and W. B. Caldwell, Tetrahedron, 1996, 52, 5113;
D. Bonifazi, O. Enger and F. Diederich, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007,36, 390; L. Sanchez, R. Otero, J. M. Gallego, R. Miranda andN. Martin, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 2081.
20 J. L. Biedler, S. Suzanne Roffler-Tarlov, M. Schachner andL. S. Freedman, Cancer Res., 1978, 38, 3751.
21 Z.-W. Sun, L. Zhang, S.-J. Zhu, W.-C. Chen and B. Mei, Neurosci.Bull., 2010, 26, 8.
22 M. Maggini, G. Scorrano and M. Prato, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993,115, 9798; K. Kordatos, T. Da Ros, S. Bosi, E. Vazquez,M. Bergamin, C. Cusan, F. Pellarini, V. Tomberli, B. Baiti,D. Pantarotto, V. Georgakilas, G. Spalluto and M. Prato,J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 4915.
23 L. Valli and D. M. Guldi, in Fullerenes: from Synthesis toOptoelectronic Properties, ed. D. M. Guldi and N. Martin, KluwerAcademic Publ., Dordrecht, 2002, vol. 4, p. 327.
24 Y. Shirai, L. Cheng, B. Chen and J. M. Tour, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,2006, 128, 13479; Y. S. Shon, K. F. Kelly, N. J. Halas andT. R. Lee, Langmuir, 1999, 15, 5329; O. Enger, F. Nuesch,M. Fibbioli, L. Echegoyen, E. Pretsch and F. Diederich,J. Mater. Chem., 2000, 10, 2231; W. B. Caldwell, K. Chen,C. A. Mirkin and S. J. Babinec, Langmuir, 1993, 9, 1945.
25 F. Y. Song, S. Zhang, D. Bonifazi, O. Enger, F. Diederich andL. Echegoyen, Langmuir, 2005, 21, 9246.
26 S. D. Sheridan, S. Gil, M. Wilgo and A. Pitt, in Stem Cell Culture,Elsevier Academic Press Inc., San Diego, 2008, vol. 86, p. 29.
27 M. Encinas, M. Iglesias, Y. H. Liu, H. Y. Wang, A. Muhaisen,V. Cena, C. Gallego and J. X. Comella, J. Neurochem., 2000,75, 991.
Fig. 2 (a) Phase contrast image of neuron-like cells grown on a
normal cell culture Petri dish by differentiation of SH-SY5Y.
(b, c) SEM images of differentiated neuron-like SH-SY5Y cells grown
on SAMs [1�Au(111)] and [2�Au(111)], respectively.
Dow
nloa
ded
by M
cGill
Uni
vers
ity o
n 21
/04/
2013
18:
12:4
5.
Publ
ishe
d on
24
Aug
ust 2
011
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C1C
C13
971A
View Article Online