6585326 story of demat scam

8/9/2019 6585326 Story of Demat Scam

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/6585326-story-of-demat-scam 1/67

Story of Demat Scam1,00,000 Bogus Demat A/c, Bank A/c, Cornering Small Investors’ Portion Covering 53IPOs’ – 5 Crore Shares

Presentation by Dr. KIRIT SOMAIYA Investors’ Grievances Forum



IPO-DEMAT SCAM – STORY OF SCAM – SHAME21st Century India is moving in the direction of becoming a Developed Country. Importance on the growth, Government investment in infrastructure from the year 2000 has changed the picture of Indian economy. Rs 1,00,000 crore Government spending on the core and infrastructure industries during 2001-03, has created a boom in the Indian Economy. Indian industries have gained self-confidence to compete with the world. The boom in the economy resulted in the boom in finance indust

ry and that of Capital Market. It is unique in India that every bull run in theCapital Market has got supplemented by a scam. Harshad Mehta Scam – 1992, the scamof CRBNBFC, the plantation companies and the Ketan Parekh Scam. Industries andfinance sector always tried to tap the primary market during a boom. Mobilize the financial resources through Public Issues and IPOs. In 2004-05, more than Rs.24,000 crores have been mobilized from the primary market through Public Issues and IPOs. It is the sad part of the Indian Capital Market that every IPO boom hasa scam. It was during 1986-88, the primary market momentum had a mini-scam of mini-steel plants and mini-cement plant public issues. These companies tapped themarket, fooled the Small Investors, collected hundreds of crores of Rupees, diverted the funds. Small Investor was the loser. After the Harshad Mehta pick, once again the primary market got a momentum during 1995 to 1997 which resulted int

o the vanishing companies scam. Almost 1000 companies raised funds through Public Issues and got vanished. During the Ketan Parekh Scam, several companies changed their names from NBFC, finance companies to Infotech companies. Tapped the market. Several companies also created the hype and got benefited by higher premium.Small Investors the looser.



The IPO-Demat Scam of 2005 is in a way repetition of history. It is economic growth, booming economy, momentum to Capital Market and once again scamsters. Samementality has destroyed the whole of the Indian finance/capital market regulatory network. It is just like a virus. Which has demolished, corrupted the bankingsystem, depository system, Stock Exchanges,SRO,s Rregulatory network. The failure of surveillance and vigilance at every level from the Finance Ministry, RBI, SEBI, NSDL, CDSL, NSE, BSE, Banks, Depositories. In a single day, 10,000 bank acc

ounts were being opened, nobody questioned. Same day 10,000s Demat accounts wereopened, nobody gets suspicious. Is it possible? It is connivance. The scamsters, the syndicate corrupted the whole system. The Demat scam is the connivance ofso-called Panchals, the broker, the investor, the banker and the DP. All came together to master-mind the scam, corrupted 53 Public Issues, siphoned off more than 5 crores shares of Small Investors. It is a tragedy on the part of the Indianregulators that the scam is going on since August 2004. Banks finance so-calledPublic Issue applications without even asking them to open a bank account. It is Bharat Overseas Bank, Citibank…… gave IPO finance of hundreds of crores of Rupeesto a single person such as Roopalben-Syndicate in the name of tens of thousandsof fictitious applicants/names. Karvy, the Depository, processed tens of thousands of applications, allotted them shares without even receiving applications.Inv

estors’ Grievances Forum is committed to protect the interest of Small Investors.The Small Investors demands justice. Losses incurred by the Small Investors dueto the siphoning off of their shares by these scamsters be recovered from them.Be returned to those Small Investors/applicants. Five times penalties be levied.This may be deposited into the Investors’ Education and Protection Fund. We wantcriminal action against the scamsters. Section 68A of the Companies Act is veryclear and specific.” To apply in Public Issues in a fictitious name is a crime, punishable with imprisonment up to 5 years. SEBI and the Government has to initiate criminal action. Here is a presentation on the Demat Scam. We appeal to all toteach a lesson to the scamster. Let us show the International Regulators, India, Indian Government, Indian Regulators also act like the Regulators of the Developed Countries. Take the issue to the logical end and get justice to Small Investors.

- KIRIT SOMAIYA



Story of Greed, Failure of System• Started in August 2004 • Loot & Cornering Small Investors Quota by Syndicate of Broker, Investor, Bank, DP • Failure of Surveilance & Vigilance of Regulators • 53 Ipo’s5 crore Shares, 1 Lac Bogus Demat a/cThe Roopalben, Sungandh Investments, Zaveri’s, Budhwani’s & Sakseria’s, along with theBrokerInvestors, with support of Banker & DP run the ‘Show-Scam’ for 18 months.



Story of Panchals• Story of Roopalben, Sugandh Investments, Zaveri, Budhwanis, Sakserias • Story of Bharat Overseas Bank, City Bank, Indian Overseas Banks……. • Story of Karvy Registrar, DP, Stock Broker • Failure of SEBI, NSDL, CDSL, RBI,BSEConnivance of all of te above made 43,982 applications in fictitious names in IDFC Public Issue. Got alloted 1,17,05,872 shares. Roopalben & Budhwani were allowed to open 5,000 Bogus Demat A/c on the last day of IDFC issue by Karvy & Bharat

Overseas Bank.



Mastermind to corner Small Investors Share• The entire gameplan, craftily designed, • masterminded and executed by a coterie of operators acting in concert • tout ensemble through the mechanism of front entities of name-lenders • clear abuse of the very process of IPO, meant to shore up the participation of small investors. • The syndicate “shared” the “Share Allotment Benefit” Investor to get 50% of Bogus Allotment – ‘Panchals’ & Broker, the Shell Investment Co’sremaining 50%. Karvy put – added further thousands application.



SEBI Order on IDFC• Thousands of applications in fictitious / benami names. • IPO applicants merely name-lenders or non-existent • These Bogus allottees transferred shares to Panchals,Budhwanis the Syndicate • Transfer of shares before listing • Sold shares on the first day of listing • Windfall gain • Elbowing out the genuine retail investors • Bankin depositories allowed syndicate to open benami/ fictitious demat and bank accounts



IPO of IDFC• IPO of IDFC opened on July 15, 2005 and closed on July 22, 2005. • Basis of allotment finalized on Aug 04, 2005. • Shares credited to IPO allottees on August 05/06,2005. • Shares got listed on the Stock Exchanges on August 12, 2005. • Yes, beforelisting the Scamsters use to transfer shares to the Beneficiaries accounts. Mutual understanding. Unsigned Moll.



Small Investors Portion/ Quota• IDFC came out with public issue of 403,600,000 equity shares of Rs. 10 each forcash at a price of Rs. 34 per equity share . • 141,260,000 equity shares were to be offered to Small Individual Investors (defined as Individual Bidders who bid for equity shares for an amount less than or equal to Rs. 1,00,000 as per prospectus).



Transactions in IDFC Shares by Roopalben Panchal & Associates• Roopalben have their demat a/c with Karvy Stock Broking Ltd. • Panchals also havethousands of FictitiousBogus-Benami Demat Accounts & Banks A/C at the same address– 34 Ketan Tower, Camp Road, Shahibaugh, Ahmedabad-380004. – 402-403, Shashwat, Opp.Gujarat College, Ellisbridge, Ahmedabad , – bank accounts with Bharat Overseas Bank, C G Road, Ahmedabad.



Roopalben Panchal & Others• Roopalben received 39,43,184 shares from 14,807 demat a/c’s on August 11 • Purshottam Budhwani received 2,98,412 shares from 1122 demat a/c’s on 8 August • Roopalben also received 32,61,426 shares from 12,257 dematerialized a/c on 8 Aug • Sugandh Investment Pvt. Ltd. received 27,08,944 share- 10181 demat a/c on 8 Aug



Bogus Demat a/c of Panchals & Others in IDFCMs. Roopalben Panchal 27064 Sugandh Estates 10181 and Investments Pvt. Ltd. ShriPurshottam Ghanshyam Budhwani Shri Manojdev Seksaria TOTAL 4748

1989

43982

Source: SEBI Order on IDFC – Demat Scam



Roopalben 12,257demat a/c-NSDLopened in 21 various batches on 21 diff. datesSr.No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Demat A/c Opening Upto 15.08.04 16.08.04 17.08.04 18.08.0419.07.05 20.07.05 21.07.05 Total No. of Accounts 5990 2729 195 59 1001 1525 75812257



Sugandh Invest Demat A/C opening



Budhwani demat a/c openingSr.N o. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Demat A/c Opening Upto 15.08.04 13.10.04 10.06.05 14.06.05 15.06.05 22.07.05 Total No. of Accounts 670 424 40 18 142 2822 12257



Budhwani’s Banks A/C’s

How a person is allowed to open so many accounts in the same Branch. For a SmallInvestor, Bank asks so many documents and for Budhwanis, “Khulja Sim Sim”, “Red carpet for Budhwanis & Panchals”.



Modus Operandi

Yes, this is the Syndicate. How they share to Benefit - Shares



Office of Dummy – Fictitious Investment Co.

25/A 68 Gate No 6, Malwani, Malad (W), Mumbai 95



Kirit Somaiya visited the Benami Co. at Malawni Slum Area with the slum dwellers



Modus Opurendy-2

The Syndicate of “Panchals, Broker – Bogus – Shell Co. & Investors”



Modus Opurendi for Firm Allotment• Out of the above 2,54,828 applicants that had applied in the 1400 shares category and had received allotment in the IPO of IDFC, as many as 43,982 applicants representing 17.26% of the applicants of Roopalben, Sugandh, Budhwani and Seksariaappear to be fictitious Every applicant got allotment Also, the above suspectedfictitious applicants had received IPO allotment of about 1,17,05,872 shares representing about 8.29% of the retail portion of 14,12,60,000 shares of the They

apply for such a lot so every application will have allotment

• • •



Dealing by 5 entity received share from Roopalben



Benami Applicant -The Bogus address – 39, Kailash Niwas 2, Mehta Road, Ghatkopar (E), Mumbai 77



Roopalben-Fairy Tale• How an individual can open 27,064 A/C • Can persuade all 27,064 to make offmarkettransfers to her demat account • Immediately prior to the scheduled listing on thestock exchanges • It is simply fairy-tallish.



Syndicate• • • • • Panchals, Budhawani, Zaveri,Sakseria Broker Investors- Shell Co’s Karvy DP, KarvRegistrar Bank Branch Managers & Management



Karvy the Culprit• Milibhagat with Syndicate-Panchals • No details of Bank a/c & Refund mentioned inthe Application forms • Cheques issued with contineous serial numbers for thousands of aplicants • Opened fictitious demat a/c • Forms, details not available now • Issued single refund cheque for thousands • Of applicants • Karvy the Registrar, DP, Stock Broker, thousands of forms incomplete, applicants not traceable. Applicationsprocessed – allotted without receiving forms.



Order of SEBI – Action on IDFC• Panchals,Investors,Syndicate & Others directed not to buy, sell in the securities market, directly or indirectly • NSDL and CDSL to ensure that the demate a/c which served as conduit for Roopalben, Sugandh, Budhwani and Seksaria are not utilized for manipulation of IPO allotment in future. • SEBI is directed to conduct immediately inspection of Karvy-RTI



•

The following entities are directed not to buy, sell or deal in the securities market, directly or indirectly, till further directions:i. Ms. Roopalben Nareshbhai Panchal ii. Sugandh Estates & Investments P Ltd. iii. Shri Purshottam Ghanshyam Budhwani iv. Shri Manojdev Seksaria

SEBI Directives

•

The following entities are directed not to buy, sell or deal in the shares of IDFC Ltd. and in other ensuing future IPOs, directly or indirectly, till further directions:• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Zenet Software Ltd. Tauras Infosys Ltd. Rajan Vasudev DapkPanchal Jayantilal Jitmal Seer Finlease Pvt. Ltd. Excell Multitech Ltd. DevangiDipakbhai Panchal Hasmukhlal N. Vora Welvet Financial Advisors Pvt. Ltd. JayeshP Khandwala HUF Guatam N Jhaveri Shilpa Rajan Dapki Dipak Jashvantlal Panchal Hina Bhargav Panchal Bhanuprasad Dipakkumar Trivedi

•Sujal Leasing Pvt. Ltd. •Dushyant Natwarlal Dalal •Puloma Dushyant Dalal •Amadhi Investments Ltd. •Ritaben R Thakkar •Monal Y Thakkar •Page 46 of 49 •Vinod Modha •Kelan AtulbhaiDoshi •Jitendra Lalwani •Lok Prakashan Ltd. •Bahubali Shantilal Shah •Smruti Shreyans Shah •Shreyans Shantilal Shah •Datamatics Telecom Ltd. •Dharmesh Bhupendra M •Biren Kantilal Shah •Suresh Bhikha Vasava •Javeri Gautambhai •Jay Shah



Bharat Overseas Bank• Connivance or Negligence ? • Extending IPO finance to fictitious/benami individuals • Providing intra day funding of margin money to brokers • Extended huge amounts to the group through these fictitious/benami individuals • The internal control system has failed to arrest the above irregularities • Collection of account payee cheques of various individuals who are not the customers • Crediting the proceeds ofthe refund orders to accounts other than the accounts of the payees



RBI Findings• Imposed monetary penalties for violation of RBI regulations on Know Your Customer (KYC) norms • Breach of prudent banking practices • facilitating misuse of IPO finance to ineligible borrowers. • Issued show cause notices • RBI conclusion that violations were substantiated • Accordingly the monetary penalties are imposed.



Reserve Bank of India OrderPenalty levied on Following Banks– – – – – – – Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. Indian Overseas Bank Vijaya Bank City Bank HDFC Batd. ICICI Bank Ltd. Standard Chartered Bank



• Issue opened on June 15, 2005 • Listed at BSE & NSE July 12 • Roopalben Panchal transferred 9,31,600 shares to seven entities on July 11, i.e. prior to the listing • In order to get an allotment of 9,31,600 shares Roopalben had to apply for croresof shares • Involving many crores of rupees in application money • Observed that Roopalben Panchal’s name in the list of applicants/ allotees only once

Scam-Yes Bank IPO



Yes Bank Issue• Public Issue @ Rs 45 • 1.75 Crores Shares Reserved for Small Investors • Rupalben cornered & sold 8,39,500 shares @ Rs 61.40 • Rupalben & Syndicate earned profit of Rs 1,37,67,8000



Gimmick of Roopalben in Yes Bank IPO• 6,315 Bogus-fictitious applications, Demat A/cs, Bank A/cs • Similar Addresses ofAhmedabad for Demat A/c • On all applications similar address of Bharat Overseas Bank, Worli, Mumbai • 9,47,250 shares allotment to these fictitious accounts



Syndicate of Panchal-Investors• Roopalben made off market transfers on 11.07.05 to the following entities: • • • • • •

1. Seer Finlease P.Ltd. 2. Excell Multitech Ltd. 3. Devangi Dipakbhai Panch5. Tauras Infosys Ltd. 6. Rajan Vasudev Dapki

-

3,32,875 shares 1,61,180 shares 2,20,000 shares 92,855 shares 80,590 shares 44,100 shares



Roopalben & Investors• Roopalben received funds from 8 entities • Prior to the IPO of Yes Bank Ltd. • Devangi Dipak Panchal, Rajan Dapki, Zenet Software Ltd., Excell Multitech Ltd., Taurus Infosys Ltd., Seer Finlease P Ltd., Barghav Panchal (HUF) and Jayantilal Jitmal • She in turn transferred these funds to 6315 entities who had utilized these funds for making applications in the IPO of YBL.



Sugandh Investment – Yes Bank• • • • 1315 Bogus applications Allotment of 1,97,250 shares Profit of Rs 32,26,492 Modus-operandi similar to Rupalben



Order of SEBI – Action on Yes Bank• Panchals & Others directed not to buy, sell or deal in Yes Bank and other Companies Shares, ensuing IPOs, directly or indirectly • NSDL is directed to ensure thatthe 6315 demate a/c of Roopalben and 1315 demate a/c of Sugandh not utilized for manipulation of IPO in future. • NSDL is directed to undertake a comprehensive inspection of Karvy-DP • NSDL and CDSL are advised to enhance their surveillance



10,669 Bogus demat a/c opened on 16 Aug. 2004Ms. Roopalben Panchal Sugandh Estates and Investments Pvt. Ltd. TOTAL 6483 418610,669



Major Public issues 2003-05



Major IPO Bogus Applications



Criminal Action Demanded• Criminal action against Panchals and others for opening bogus Demat and Bank Accounts. • Companies Act is clear on this under Sub-section (1) of Section 68A : “Anyperson who :a) Makes in a fictitious name an application to a Company for acquiring or subscribing for any shares therein, or b) Otherwise induces a Company to allot, or register any transfer of, shares therein to him, or any other person in a fictitio

us name, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years.”

• As per Sec. 55A of Companies Act, provision of 68A is to be administered by SEBI. In case of listed companies, Sec. 621 authorizes SEBI to file complaints for offences under the Companies Act.



Karvy the Culprit• All the major scamsters along with Karvy have looted the Small Investors. • More than 95% bogus fictitious Demat accounts have been opened by Karvy DP. • Karvy hasaccepted payment and also refunded the amount to the scamsters • It is unearthed that Karvy was issuing single cheque to Panchals, Sugandh Investment for these benami, forged applications. • The Syndicate of Karvy, Bharat Overseas Bank, investors, Panchals was transferring refunds belonging to thousands of bogus applicants

with help of Electronic Clearing System directly in the bank accounts of Panchals & Others



Action on Karvy• Thousands of dematerialized accounts being opened on the same day with the samebranch and being introduced by the same bank should have alerted the DPs at thetime of opening of the dematerialized accounts. • However the fact that DPs failedto exercise even this basic due diligence gives rise to a suspicion that they have actively colluded with the perpetrators. It is a matter of serious concern that Karvy-DP has opened such apparently benami / fictitious accounts working out

to over 95% (42,056 nos) of the multiple dematerialized accounts in relation toIDFC IPO.



Issue Raised by Parliamentarians• Members of Parliament have taken this issue with Finance Minister :– – – – – Shri Shri Shri Shri Shri Shri Shri Dharmendra Pradhan, MP Yeshawant Sinha Vedprakash Goyal Vallabhbhai Kathuria, MP Suresh Waghmare, MP Sanjay Talathi, MP Satish T. Gao, MP

• Demanded protection of Small Investors & Criminal Action



IGF Demands• IGF demanded full-fledged investigation the role played by Karvy - Karvy Registrar, Karvy Stock Broker, Karvy DP. • IGF has also come to the conclusion that thousands of applications have been made without completing the formalities. In manycases, addresses are not available or application forms are also not available. •IGF demands that till all the investigation is completed, all the activities ofKarvy be suspended immediately.



Action Demanded by IGF• Action under Sec. 68A of Companies Act against the scamster. • Anybody applies inan IPO in fictitious, bogus names is punishable for 5 years imprisonment. • As perSec. 55A of Companies Act, provision of Sec.68A is to be administered by SEBI in case of listed companies. • As IGF has already demanded action by SEBI and NSDL,we would request you to ask Karvy to initiate criminal action. • We once again insist that such action must be initiated by SEBI, NSDL for Karvy.



IGF Representations to• Hon. P.C. Gupta, Company Affairs Minister • SEBI, Finance Ministry, RBI, NSDL & CDSL, Stock Exchanges (BSE/NSE) • Bharat Overseas Bank, Karvy, • Home Minister, Gujarat Govt. • Economic Offence Wing, Gujarat Police, • Palton Road Police Station, Mumbai



IGF Action : Police Complaint at Palton Road Police Station ,Mumbai



IGF Action : Police Complaint at Police Headquarters- Gandhinagar, Gujarat



RBI Findings & Directives• Bank a/c opened without Forms etc • IPO financing given for Fictitious Applicants •Broker-Investor a/c debited & credited for fictitious applicants • Partner in theScam • Complete audit & Investigation of last 3 years IPO financing



05060034 05060035 05060036 05060037 05060038 05060039 05060040 05060041 0506004205060043 05060044 05060045 05060047 05060046 05060048 05060049 05060051 05060050 05060052 05060053 05060054 05060055 05060056 05060057 05060058 05060059 05060060 05060061 05060062 05060064 05060063 05060066 05060065 05060067 05060068 05060069 05060070 05060071 05060072 05060073

AURIONPRO SOLUTIONS LTD. PARADYNE INFOTECH LTD. SHREE RENUKA SUGARS LTD. GUJARAT

INDUSTRIES POWER CO.LTD. K.M.SUGAR MILLS LTD. BANNARI AMMAN SPINNING MILLS LTD.PBA INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. VIKASH METAL & POWER LTD. PRITHVI INFORMATION SOLUTIONSLTD. PIRAMYD RETAIL LTD. BOMBAY RAYON FASHIONS LTD. AIA ENGINEERING LTD. TRIVENI ENGINEERING & INDUSTRIES LTD. ABG SHIPYARD LTD. EVEREST KANTO CYLINDER LTD. COMPULINK SYSTEMS LTD. KERNEX MICROSYSTEMS (INDIA) LTD. REPRO INDIA LTD. ICICI BANK LTD. PVR LTD. TULIP IT SERVICES LTD. RADHA MADHAV CORP.LTD. RAMSARUP INDUSTRIES LTD. PUNJ LLOYD LTD. EDUCOMP SOLUTIONS LTD. GINNI FILAMENTS LTD. CELEBRITY FASHIONS LTD. BARTRONICS INDIA LTD. NITIN SPINNERS LTD. ROYAL ORCHID HOTELS LTD. RAJ RAYON LTD. ANDHRA BANK BANK OF BARODA SREE SAKTHI PAPER MILLS LTD. DYNEMIC PRODUCTS LTD. ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK (INDIA) LTD. GUJARAT STATE PETRONET LTD. JAGRANPRAKASHAN LTD. INOX LEISURE LTD. SUNIL HITECH ENGINEERS LTD.

9/27/2005 2700.00 BOOKBUILDING 9/30/2005 1386.00 FIXED PRICE 10/7/2005 11000.00BOOKBUILDING 10/13/2005 20000.00 BOOKBUILDING 10/14/2005 3328.00 FIXED PRICE 10/19/2005 9450.00 BOOKBUILDING 10/24/2005 3000.00 FIXED PRICE 10/24/2005 2500.00 FIXED PRICE 10/25/2005 13500.00 BOOKBUILDING 11/10/2005 6000.00 BOOKBUILDING 11/11/2005 9432.50 BOOKBUILDING 11/17/2005 14805.00 BOOKBUILDING 11/18/2005 24000.00BOOKBUILDING 11/18/2005 15725.00 BOOKBUILDING 11/22/2005 9000.00 BOOKBUILDING 11/25/2005 2723.08 FIXED PRICE 11/28/2005 9901.11 BOOKBUILDING 11/28/2005 4323.00BOOKBUILDING 12/1/2005 575000.00 BOOKBUILDING 12/8/2005 16650.00 BOOKBUILDING 12/9/2005 10800.00 BOOKBUILDING 12/12/2005 2000.00 FIXED PRICE 12/13/2005 3000.00FIXED PRICE 12/13/2005 64210.56 BOOKBUILDING 12/19/2005 5000.00 BOOKBUILDING 12/19/2005 4800.00 BOOKBUILDING 12/19/2005 8190.00 BOOKBUILDING 12/20/2005 4500.00BOOKBUILDING 1/6/2006 4000.00 BOOKBUILDING 1/12/2006 11253.00 BOOKBUILDING 1/12/2006 5525.00 BOOKBUILDING 1/16/2006 76500.00 BOOKBUILDING 1/16/2006 163300.00 B

OOKBUILDING 1/17/2006 2500.00 FIXED PRICE 1/18/2006 1543.85 FIXED PRICE 1/23/2006 21384.00 BOOKBUILDING 1/24/2006 37260.00 BOOKBUILDING 1/25/2006 36943.59 BOOKBUILDING 1/27/2006 19800.00 BOOKBUILDING 1/30/2006 3465.00 FIXED PRICE

65110 159631 52508 44337 73670 80159 58038 32044 146450 93329 152367 133481 56270 258694 74517 19306 113794 29785 256377 65129 205214 38580 41710 340800 93636 41669 82702 151908 149779 253519 49291 228335 224064 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

25.84 44.33 6.19 1.87 19.42 9.74 35.01 5.82 16.27 15.66 19.02 12.22 1.94 25.50 9.66 3.45 14.85 7.27 0.75 3.95 25.09 19.67 10.80 9.22 20.82 6.27 11.37 42.91 38.22 28.35 8.98 3.04 1.56 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

12.04 44.33 14.20 4.23 15.15 6.55 8.01 3.63 15.14 11.22 17.09 32.05 10.05 54.4715.51 2.01 22.67 9.18 5.95 14.35 28.14 8.28 9.34 42.92 33.60 3.19 27.04 27.45 20.23 39.01 3.86 10.68 13.85 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA : NOT AVAILABLE



Reserve Bank of India action on Banks January 13, 2006 Bharat Overseas Bank, Vijaya Bank and certain other banks. The detailed scrutiny by the Reserve Bank revealed that the funding of IPOs through multiple accounts was being followed by Bharat Overseas Bank and this covered funding of several other IPOs, Infrastructure Development Finance Company (IDFC) being one of them. Misuse of IPO finance- Penal action taken The Reserve Bank of India in exercise of powers vested in it under the provisions of Section 47 A (1)(b) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 i

mposed monetary penalties on seven scheduled commercial banks for violation of RBI regulations on Know Your Customer (KYC) norms, for breach of prudent bankingpractices and facilitating misuse of IPO finance to ineligible borrowers. The RBI had issued show cause notices to all these banks. In response thereto banks had submitted their written responses and the CEOs had also sought personal hearing with the RBI, which was granted. On careful examination of banks

submission,the RBI has come to a conclusive decision that the aforesaid violations were substantiated and accordingly the monetary penalties are imposed. Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd., the bank had committed the following irregularities (i) Extending IPOfinance to fictitious/benami individuals without appropriate due diligence to establish their identity or existence. (ii) Apart from providing intra day fundingof margin money to brokers, the bank had extended huge amounts to a group of ac

counts through these fictitious/benami individuals in violation of RBI directiveon limits on funding of IPOs, (which specified, inter-alia, a limit of Rs.10 lakh per individual). (iii) The internal control system has failed to arrest the above irregularities. It also did not act upon the alerts emanated from the internal audit. (iv) Collection of account payee cheques of various individuals who are not the customers of the bank, besides crediting the proceeds of the refund orders to accounts other than the accounts of the payees.



3. In view of the above, the Reserve Bank of India has imposed a penalty of Rs.20.00 lakh (Rupees twenty lakh only) on the bank.

Citi BankAfter examining the bank

s reply and your oral submission on January 21, 2006, The Reserve Bank of India held, inter-alia, that the bank had violated RBI guidelines/directives/instructions 1.relating to monitoring of suspicious transactions

, adherence to KYC norms 2. Issue of large number of cheque leaves not in consonance with the status of the account holder. In view of the above, the Reserve Bank of India has imposed a penalty of Rs.5.00 lakh

HDFC Bank Ltd.guidelines/directives/instructions 1.relating to opening of deposit accounts 2.failure of monitoring of transactions for adherence to KYC norms and failure ofinternal controls. In view of the above, the Reserve Bank of India has imposed apenalty of Rs.5.00 lakh (Rupees five lakh only) on the bank.

ICICI Bank Ltd.the bank had violated RBI guidelines/directives/instructions relating to opening

of accounts monitoring of transactions for adherence to KYC norms, there was failure of internal control and acceptance of account payee cheques across the counter without proper authorization. In view of the above, the Reserve Bank of India has imposed a penalty of Rs.5.00 lakh (Rupees five lakh only) on the bank.



Indian Overseas Bank,the bank had violated RBI guidelines / directives/instructions in regard to thefollowing aspects. a) Opening multiple accounts without adhering to KYC norms. b) Facilitating manipulation of IPO process by certain group of individuals by extending IPO finance to various fictitious individuals. c) Failing to monitor theunusual and suspicious transactions in the account the failure of internal controls in monitoring the non-compliance with KYC policies/ procedures In view of t

he above, the Reserve Bank of India has imposed a penalty of Rs.15.00 lakh (Rupees fifteen lakh only) on the bank.

Standard Chartered Bank,the bank had violated the RBI guidelines/directives/instructions relating to KYCnorms, failed to verify the end use of funds in respect of loans granted against shares to a number of individuals. In view of the above, the Reserve Bank of India has imposed a penalty of Rs.5.00 lakh (Rupees five lakh only) on the bank.

Vijaya Bank,the bank had violated following RBI guidelines /directives/instructions. a) Opening multiple accounts without adherence to KYC norms b) Failing to monitor large

value transactions c) Failure of internal control to check the irregularities in KYC compliance and monitoring of transactions in the deposit accounts. .In view of the above, the Reserve Bank of India has imposed a penalty of Rs.10.00 lakh(Rupees ten lakh only) on the bank.a)



IGF Sources• Small Applicants- investors • SEBI, RBI, Fin Ministry, NSDL, CDSL, Income Tax Dept, Exchanges • Media Reports • Market Experts & Source • Banks, Brokers & others

6585326 story of demat scam

Documents