7. battle of antietam

15
Battle of Antietam (Sharpsburg) September 17, 1862 Army of Northern Virginia and the Army of the Potomac clashed in the bloodiest single day of the entire Civil War

Upload: davmfoster

Post on 11-Nov-2014

426 views

Category:

News & Politics


1 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 7. battle of antietam

Battle of Antietam(Sharpsburg)

September 17, 1862 Army of Northern Virginia and the

Army of the Potomac clashed in the bloodiest single day of the entire Civil War

Page 2: 7. battle of antietam

Antietam

• In desperation, Lincoln restored McClellan to command

• As Lee marched into Maryland he expected the Federals to abandon their 12,000-man garrison at Harper’s Ferry

• When they didn’t, Lee was forced to divide his army in order to deal with this threat to his rear Harper’s Ferry sits at the

confluence of the Potomac and Shenandoah Rivers

Page 3: 7. battle of antietam

Antietam

• Lee divided his army into four parts– Three of them

under Jackson headed toward Harper’s Ferry

– A fourth under Longstreet headed for Boonsboro

Page 4: 7. battle of antietam

Antietam

• Lee’s army was now scattered and McClellan had time to organize his forces– He was aided by finding a

copy of Lee’s plan• Still McClellan lacked the

killer instinct necessary to take full advantage of the situation The “Lost Order”

Page 5: 7. battle of antietam

Antietam• In the actual battle, McClellan

moved slowly and committed his forces piecemeal which allowed Lee to shift his outnumbered forces from one threatened point to another– Neither the Federal V or VI

Corps, some 22,000 men, would play a significant role in the battle

Page 6: 7. battle of antietam

Antietam• At “Burnside’s Bridge,”

Ambrose Burnside’s IX Corps of some 12,000 was held in check from 9:30 to 1:00 by only 450 Confederates after Burnside launched several attacks

• When he finally crossed the creek, Burnside spent two hours resting and reorganizing on the other side before continuing toward Sharpsburg

Burnside’s Bridge

Page 7: 7. battle of antietam

Antietam• Once Burnside got moving and

started to push the Confederates back, A. P. Hill arrived with his division from Harper’s Ferry and counterattacked into Burnside’s unprotected left flank

• Burnside was driven back to the heights near Burnside’s Bridge

• Longstreet later wrote, “We were so badly crushed that at the close of the day ten thousand fresh troops could have come in and taken Lee's army and everything in it.”– Still McClellan held the V

Corps and VI Corps in reserve

Page 8: 7. battle of antietam

Antietam• Antietam was the bloodiest single

day of the war– The Confederates suffered

13,700 casualties out of 40,000 engaged

– The Federals lost 12,350 out of 87,000

• The battle ended as a tactical draw, but a strategic victory for the Federals because Lee was forced to withdraw back to Virginia

• It was enough of a victory for Lincoln to issue his Emancipation Proclamation

Confederate dead in the Bloody Lane

Page 9: 7. battle of antietam

The End of Conciliation• Many Federal generals had sought to wage war

consistent with Winfield Scott’s limited approach in Mexico

• The idea was to practice a conciliatory policy that held that mild treatment of Southerners, their property, and their institutions would ultimately result in their returning their allegiance to the US

• McClellan argued for this practice in a letter he gave Lincoln on July 8 stating “A declaration of radical views, especially upon slavery, will rapidly disintegrate our present armies.”

Page 10: 7. battle of antietam

Moves toward Emancipation

• A few generals such as Ben Butler, John Fremont, and David Hunter however were pushing for emancipation

• Lincoln too was beginning to move in that direction and on July 22, 1862 he showed his cabinet a preliminary draft of the Emancipation Proclamation– But Lincoln needed a battlefield victory to give him an

opportunity to make the Proclamation public– Antietam accomplished that

Page 11: 7. battle of antietam

Emancipation Proclamation

• Issued September 22, 1862• “That on the first day of January,

in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free…”

Page 12: 7. battle of antietam

Emancipation Proclamation• The Emancipation Proclamation changed the

very nature of the war, giving it a completely new objective

• Conciliation was no longer an option• Represented a move toward total war

– The North was now not merely fighting to restore a union it thought was never legitimately separated. It was fighting for freedom of a race.

– The South was no longer fighting merely for independence. It was fighting for survival of its way of life.

Page 13: 7. battle of antietam

Impact of Emancipation Proclamation• Jefferson Davis

– labeled REBELLION on chain. • Defeated

– seated figure with small hammer labeled COMPROMISE.

• Henry W. Halleck– wields mallet labeled SKILL.

• George McClellan– wields mallet labeled STRATEGY.

• Edwin M. Stanton– holds mallet labeled DRAFT.

• Lincoln– shoulders an axe labeled

EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION.

Stanton: Halleck may use his skill and Mac his strategy, but this draft will do the business. Lincoln: You can try him with that, but I'm afraid this axe of mine is the only thing that will fetch him.

Page 14: 7. battle of antietam

Diplomatic Impact

• The South had longed hoped for European recognition and intervention

• The Emancipation Proclamation made that virtually impossible because England had abolished slavery in 1833 and France in 1848

John Slidell represented the Confederacy in France

Page 15: 7. battle of antietam

Impact of Emancipation Proclamation on Confederate Diplomatic Efforts

• “… the feeling against slavery in England is so strong that no public man there dares extend a hand to help us… There is no government in Europe that dares help us in a struggle which can be suspected of having for its result, directly or indirectly, the fortification or perpetuation of slavery. Of that I am certain” – William Yancey, Confederate politician