7:9d-2 - roche · pdf filesoil remedial action report – investigative areas (ias) 1 and...

46

Upload: ngothu

Post on 14-Mar-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate
Page 2: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate
Page 3: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate
Page 4: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Investigative Area IA-1 – Building 55 Area In Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO) / Discharge to Groundwater Permit-by-Rule (DGW-PBR)

Interim Remedial Measure Progress Report

Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. Facility

Nutley, New Jersey

Prepared For:

Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. 800 Bloomfield Avenue, Suite 127 Nutley, NJ 07110-1199 PI ID #009949

Prepared By:

TRC Environmental Corporation 41 Spring Street, Suite 102 New Providence, NJ 07974

February 2, 2017

Page 5: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

i of iii

Investigative Area IA-1 – Building 55 Area In Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO) / Discharge to Groundwater Permit-by-Rule (DGW-PBR)

Interim Remedial Measure Progress Report Revision: 0

Date: February 2, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section No. Title Page No.

1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1

1.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 SITE SETTING ................................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 SUMMARY OF CONTAMINANTS ......................................................................................................... 3 1.4 PREVIOUS REMEDIATION EFFORTS .................................................................................................... 3 1.5 OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................................. 3 1.6 DOCUMENT OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................... 4

2.0 ISCO TREATMENT PROGRAM ................................................................................................... 5

2.1 ISCO TREATMENT SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 5 2.2 GROUNDWATER MONITORING ............................................................................................................. 6 2.3 ISCO STUDY RESULTS ......................................................................................................................... 7

2.3.1 Groundwater Quality Parameters 2.3.2 VOC Results

2.4 ISCO STUDY PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................. 8 2.5 PROPOSED IA-1 BUILDING 55 AREA NEXT STEPS ..................................................................................... 8

3.0 UPDATED SCHEDULE .............................................................................................................. 10

Page 6: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

ii of iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)

List of Figures

Figure No. Title

1 IA-1 Building 55 Area

2 Baseline VOC Concentrations IA-1 Building 55 Area

3 Excavation Locations IA-1 Building 55 Area

4 January 2016 VOC Concentrations IA-1 Building 55 Area January

List of Tables Table No. Title

1 Groundwater Sampling Measurements and Calculations - Low-Flow Purging

2 Summary of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Groundwater

Page 7: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

iii of iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)

List of Appendices

Appendix No. Title Appendix A NJDEP Permit-By-Rule Authorization Correspondence

Appendix B Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) of Injected Amendments

List of Attachments

Attachment Title Attachment 1 Accutest Laboratory Reports and NJDEP Electronic Deliverable Submissions for Accutest Laboratory Reports (Compact Disc provided in NJDEP hard copy only) Attachment 2 Full Digital Copy of Progress Report (Text, Figures, Tables, and Appendices)

Page 8: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Page 1 of 10

HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. INVESTIGATIVE AREA IA-1 – BUILDING 55 AREA In Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO) / Discharge to

Groundwater Permit-by-Rule (DGW-PBR) PROGRESS REPORT

Revision: 0 Date: February 2, 2017

1.0 INTRODUCTION

On behalf of Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. (Roche), TRC Environmental Corporation (TRC) has prepared this Interim Remedial Measure (IRM) Progress Report for shallow groundwater in Investigative Area (IA)-1 near former Building 55, hereinafter referred to as the IA-1 Building 55 Progress Report, for the Roche Facility (Site) located at 340 Kingsland Street, Nutley, New Jersey. The Site is situated on approximately 120 acres of land within the City of Clifton, Passaic County and the Township of Nutley, Essex County. The 2015 IA-1 Building 55 IRM Progress Report provides a summary of the treatment program, including methods, amendment quantities, and supporting data. The groundwater monitoring results through January 2016 (4-months post-treatment) are transmitted herein and provide a preliminary assessment of remedial progress. Since remediation is in progress, it is premature to perform detailed evaluations of the results and develop conclusions. Detailed evaluations and conclusions will be provided in a subsequent submittal. The IA-1 Building 55 IRM, which consisted of an in situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) treatment program, was implemented in accordance with the Permit-By-Rule (PBR) Notification Approval letter provided by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP), dated March 3, 2015 (Appendix A). TRC completed the soil amendment portion of the 2015 ISCO Program in August 2015 and reports the progress herein. This 2015 IA-1 Building 55 Progress Report submission satisfies the reporting requirements set forth in the NJDEP’s PBR Notification Approval letter. This report describes groundwater remediation activities during the period from April 1, 2015 through January 31, 2016.

1.1 Background Information

The main campus of the Roche Nutley facility was developed for industrial purposes in 1928 for the manufacturing of vitamins, fine chemicals, pharmaceuticals and research and development. Prior to Roche’s ownership, the main campus area primarily was used for agricultural purposes. Some portions of the current property were previously owned and operated by non-Roche entities for various commercial and manufacturing purposes; these parcels were purchased by Roche over a period of several decades subsequent to 1928. The Site has been divided into discrete investigative areas for purposes of completing a Remedial Investigation of site soil and groundwater. Investigative Area 1 (IA-1) is located in the northwestern portion of the Roche Nutley Facility (Figure 1). IA-1 consists of an area of production and waste treatment/recycling facilities (former Building 30) initially developed in the 1940s and 1950s, as well as tank storage (both above and below ground) that included a 640,000 gallon No. 6 fuel oil above

Page 9: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Page 2 of 10

ground storage tank (AST) and an oxygen storage area. The majority of IA-1 was historically used by Roche for facility maintenance, fuel oil storage, utilities, and manufacturing. This IA includes areas of concern (AOCs) consisting of ASTs, underground storage tanks (USTs), raw and hazardous material storage areas, electrical transformers and production building footprints. Remedial investigation (RI) activities specific to IA-1 Building 55 soil were conducted from December 2012 to August 2013 and documented in a report (Remedial Investigation Report – Investigation Area Nos. 1[IA-1] and 5 [IA-5], TRC November 18, 2013). Additional investigative information for groundwater in IA-1 was obtained as part of a site-wide groundwater RI (Site-wide Ground Water Remedial Investigation Report, Revision 3, TRC April 2, 2014). Soil remedial activities were conducted in IA-1/IA-5 between April 2015 and August 2015, and are documented in a Remedial Action Report (Soil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). Extensive drilling and sampling was performed through the RI and subsequent investigative efforts to characterize groundwater elevations and delineate groundwater contamination horizontally and vertically. To aid in the visualization and interpretation of these data, seven vertical investigation zones were defined based on elevation relative to mean sea level. These are:

• Shallow Zone S1 (greater than 80 feet above msl); • Shallow Zone S2 (between 80 to 50 feet above msl); • Shallow Zone S3 (between 50 to 0 feet above msl); • Deep Zone D1 (between elevation 0 to 100 feet below msl); • Deep Zone D2 (between 100 to 250 feet below msl); • Deep Zone D3 (between 250 to 400 feet below msl); and, • Deep Zone D4 (greater than 400 feet below msl).

These vertical investigation zones are elevation-based for project organizational/management purposes only. All groundwater elevation and quality data have been compiled and evaluated for delineation and remediation using this groundwater elevation investigation zone system, as discussed in the Groundwater Remedial Investigation Report (GWRIR) and Groundwater Progress Reports (GWPRs).

Roche is currently preparing a Conceptual Site Model (CSM) for the Site that builds on historic work as well as the broad knowledge base gained during the site investigations. Based on detailed analysis of stratigraphic and geophysical data, the vertical zonation of the groundwater flow system and movement of impacted groundwater is likely to be redefined, and the data will be reorganized accordingly. TRC is the environmental consultant for Roche and has been assisting Roche with multiple environmental investigations being conducted on the Nutley, NJ property. Roche has directed TRC to design and implement an ISCO soil treatment program to accelerate the remediation of shallow, overburden groundwater associated with the IA-1, in the former Building 55 area.

Page 10: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Page 3 of 10

1.2 Site Setting

IA-1 and IA-5 occupy approximately 7.3 acres and are mostly paved. The current Site topography in IA-1 is relatively flat; however, there is a portion of a soil berm in the northwest corner of IA-1, and a steep hill in the northernmost portion of IA-1 behind former Building 50. The remainder of the northern section of IA-1 has a gentle slope toward the west-southwest, and the southern section has a gentle slope toward the south-southeast. Based on numerous subsurface soil borings completed throughout IA-1, the soils beneath IA-1 are primarily comprised of red-brown silt and sand, typical for the Roche site. The bedrock at the facility is part of the Passaic Formation and contains dark reddish-brown siltstone intergraded with fine to medium-grained silty sandstone and shale. A weathered bedrock zone is present throughout much of the facility in the upper portion of the bedrock. The depth to bedrock ranges from approximately 3 to 12 feet below ground surface. Based on data collected by Roche in 2014, the general groundwater flow direction in the vicinity of IA-1 is to the south-southeast. Synoptic groundwater elevation data indicate that groundwater flow direction is consistent with that observed in previous years. Depth-to-water is approximately 5 feet below ground surface.

1.3 Summary of Primary Contaminants

The primary contaminants of concern (COCs) in groundwater associated with the IA-1 former Building 55 Area are toluene, chloroform, and methylene chloride above the Ground Water Quality Standards (GWQS) along the east and west sides of former Building 55 (Figure 2). Additionally, although not associated with the former Building 55 Area, benzene concentrations in exceedance of the GWQS have been reported in several of the IA-1 monitoring wells. During the 1st quarter 2015 sampling event (March 2015), groundwater samples from shallow overburden monitoring wells MW-254A and MW-255A (located along B55 West and B55 East, respectively) exhibited the following:

• MW-254A - toluene at 22,400 parts per billion (ppb)

• MW-255A

- chloroform at 4,710 ppb; - methylene chloride at 52.4 ppb; and - benzene at 71 ppb.

1.4 Previous Remediation Efforts

There have been no other remediation projects for shallow groundwater in this area.

1.5 Objectives

The objectives of the 2015 ISCO Treatment Program in the Building 55 area of IA-1 are:

Page 11: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Page 4 of 10

1) To reduce the mass of volatile organic compound (VOC) constituents within the target areas of the overburden groundwater.

2) To reduce aqueous VOC concentrations within the target areas of the overburden groundwater.

1.6 Document Overview

This 2015 IA-1 Building 55 Progress Report provides introductory and background information, a summary of the ISCO treatment program (amendment quantities and application methods), and a report of the groundwater sampling results through January 2016 (4 months post-treatment). The final section provides an updated implementation schedule.

Page 12: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Page 5 of 10

2.0 ISCO Treatment Program

In order to reduce the mass of the COCs in the areas of concern, catalyzed persulfate (sodium persulfate and calcium peroxide) was added to backfill up to the water table in the excavation locations, a depth of approximately 5 feet below ground surface. The ISCO treatment program included the following components:

• Excavation of Building 55 east and west down to groundwater level • Application of Oxygen BioChem™ (OBC™) • Treatment performance monitoring • Progress reporting

2.1 ISCO Treatment Summary

The field implementation was conducted by Redox Tech, Inc. with TRC-field supervision in August 2015. Following excavation to the water table, a strong chemical oxidizer, OBC™ was blended into the saturated soil in the top 1 to 2 feet of the water table using a backhoe. The soil amendment locations are detailed in Figure 3. OBC™ is an in situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) mixture supplied as a granular solid from Redox Tech, LLC formulated to remediate contaminated soil and groundwater via strong chemical oxidation. OBC™ treats soils and groundwater containing chlorinated VOC (CVOC) compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX). It consists of a mixture of sodium persulfate (70% to 90% by weight) and calcium peroxide (10% to 20%) that can be employed for ISCO applications using Klozur™ activation chemistry. The persulfate is activated by calcium peroxide (through alkalinity and peroxide) to generate sulfate radicals (SO42-), one of the strongest oxidizers available, which react rapidly with oxidizable constituents. In addition, OBC™ also provides electron acceptors (oxygen and sulfate) for longer-term biological degradation. The predominant short-term reaction is chemical oxidation (generally 1-2 months), while the longer-term remediation process is anaerobic biological degradation via sulfate reduction (generally 1-2 years). OBC™ has advantages over more traditional oxygen compounds used for bioremediation in that it works on a broader range of contaminants, including the toluene, chloroform, and methylene chloride found at Building 55. Because MW-254A had a higher total VOC concentration, the excavation on the northwest side of former Building 55 (B55 West) received a dose of 5 pounds (lbs) of persulfate per square foot of excavation, while the excavation on the southeast side of former Building 55 (B55 East) received 2 lbs of persulfate per square foot of excavation. A total of approximately 28,600 lbs of OBC™ were mixed into the excavation backfill. A material safety data sheet (MSDS) for the OBC™ is included in Appendix B. Details of the excavation are contained in the Soil Remedial Action Report, IA-1 and 5, dated January 19, 2016.

Page 13: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Page 6 of 10

2.2 Groundwater Monitoring

Groundwater samples were collected in general accordance with the PBR using NJDEP-approved low-flow sampling methods. The monitoring performed and any deviations from the PBR monitoring program are summarized below. The groundwater Licensed Site Remediation Professional (LSRP) retained for the Site was notified of the PBR plan deviations, their technical basis, and potential impacts resulting from these modifications. It was concluded that these changes did not adversely affect the program objectives and/or data quality. To satisfy the requirements of the PBR, groundwater samples were collected from the following monitoring wells (Figure 2):

• Upgradient: MW-1 • Treatment Area: MW-255B • Downgradient: MW-256B, MW-391A, and MW-392A • Side-gradient: MW-390A

MW-1A was designated as the upgradient monitoring point in the permit; however, this well was damaged and decommissioned in April 2015. MW-1 was sampled in its place. In addition, downgradient monitoring well MW-256B was damaged in September 2015, and subsequently unavailable for monitoring for several sampling rounds. The monitoring wells were sampled in April 2015 prior to IA-1 soil remedial activities, approximately 4 months prior to the application of the soil amendment. This sampling event was used to define baseline conditions for each of the monitoring points. The wells were then sampled approximately 1 month after completion of the soil treatment, and again approximately three months thereafter, in accordance with the permit. The groundwater monitoring and sampling events reported in this progress report include:

• Pre-Excavation:

- April 2015: Baseline (pre-treatment) sampling event.

• Post-Treatment:

- September 2015: 1 month post-treatment groundwater sampling event.

- January 2016: 4 months post-treatment groundwater sampling event.

All but one of the samples collected were analyzed for VOCs and field geochemical parameters, in accordance with the permit. The sample collected from MW-1 in January 2016 was collected as a part of the regular site-wide monitoring using a passive diffusion bag sampler (PDB), and was analyzed for VOCs only, field geochemical data are not available for this sample. A summary of the analytical results to date is included in the sections below.

Page 14: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Page 7 of 10

2.3 ISCO Study Results

Since remediation is ongoing, it is premature to perform detailed evaluations of the results and develop conclusions. Detailed evaluations and conclusions will be provided in a subsequent submittal. The following sections summarize the 2015 ISCO treatment program analytical results through January 2016 (4-months post-treatment), as well as the ISCO treatment preliminary conclusions as of January 2016. 2.3.1 Groundwater Quality Parameters The measurements of groundwater geochemical parameters collected for the January 2016 sampling event are summarized in Table 1. Field geochemical results for the April and September 2015 monitoring events were collected for other ongoing monitoring programs and will be submitted under separate cover. Laboratory reports and electronic data deliverables (EDDs) are included in Attachment 1. Generally, groundwater within and adjacent to the targeted area was evaluated for several geochemical characteristics:

• pH

- Important for biological activity

- Local groundwater showed a near-neutral pH which is favorable to the intended remediation.

• Dissolved oxygen (DO)

- Indicator of biological activity

- DO values ranged from below detection to 5.56 milligrams per liter (mg/L), with readings above 1 mg/L in the treatment area well (MW-255B; 1.59 mg/L) and side-gradient well (MW-390A; 5.56 mg/L). Areas where DO is greater than 1 mg/L are favorable for the biodegradation of toluene.

• Oxidation-reduction potential (ORP)

- Indicator of tendency of a chemical species to exchange electrons and thereby be oxidized or reduced

- Negative ORP in the treatment area and downgradient monitoring wells (ranging from approximately -100 to -300 mV). Negative ORP indicates that the treatment chemical (OBC) is not active in these areas.

Page 15: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Page 8 of 10

2.3.2 VOC Results Table 2 summarizes the VOC data collected during the IRM monitoring period at the IA-1 former Building 55 area. Table 2 also includes results from the regular quarterly groundwater sampling events for wells MW-254A and MW-255A in March 2015 for reference. These wells were abandoned during excavation; however the data from these wells are representative of baseline conditions. Figure 2 shows the distribution of the COCs in groundwater prior to excavation and soil treatment, Figure 3 shows the excavation areas, and Figure 4 shows the distribution of the COCs in groundwater in January 2016 (4 months post-treatment). No COCs were detected in samples from upgradient well MW-1, or in side-gradient well MW-390A in any of the monitoring events. Methylene chloride was not detected at any wells during any of the monitoring events. Prior to excavation and soil treatment, toluene was detected at low concentrations at only one of the monitoring wells located downgradient of the treatment area (MW-391A). At MW-391A, the baseline toluene concentration reported in April 2015 was 0.18 µg/L; however toluene was not detected at this well (or any of the other study wells) in any subsequent sampling event. Similarly, chloroform was detected in the baseline event at only one well downgradient of the treatment area (MW-392A, 0.42µg/L), but was not detected at any other well, or during any subsequent monitoring event. While benzene is not associated with the Building 55 treatment area, residual benzene concentrations in groundwater in the vicinity of Building 55 may also be treated by the application of the soil amendment. Prior to excavation and soil treatment, benzene was reported at low concentrations at wells MW-255B (0.78 µg/L) and MW-256B (0.93 µg/L). At the one-month post-excavation monitoring event, benzene was also detected at wells MW-255B (0.94 µg/L) and MW-391A (5.6 µg/L). The benzene concentrations at wells MW-255B and MW-391A have dropped to 0.55 µg/L and 1.6 µg/L, respectively, in the January 2016 monitoring event. Additional monitoring will be necessary to confirm decreasing benzene concentrations at these locations.

2.4 ISCO Study Preliminary Conclusions

At this stage of the ISCO treatment program, the following conclusions can be derived:

• ISCO treatment progress continues to accomplish remedial goals for the on-site overburden groundwater; and

• Longer-term monitoring is essential to confirm the observed trends.

2.5 Proposed IA-1 Building 55 Area Next Steps

The proposed next steps are summarized as follows:

Page 16: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Page 9 of 10

Continued Groundwater Monitoring:

• Continue to monitor groundwater quarterly through September 2017, in accordance with the PBR.

Page 17: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Page 10 of 10

3.0 UPDATED SCHEDULE In accordance with the PBR, the anticipated 2016-2017 ISCO Treatment Program implementation schedule is as follows:

• April 2016: 7-months post-injection groundwater sampling event;

• July 2016: 10-months post-injection groundwater sampling event;

• October 2016: 13-months post-injection groundwater sampling event;

• January 2017: 16-months post-injection groundwater sampling event;

• April 2017: 19-months post-injection groundwater sampling event;

• July 2017: 22-months post-injection groundwater sampling event;

• September 2017: 25-months post-injection groundwater sampling event

As discussed earlier, a compilation of the groundwater sampling results generated from the entire ISCO program and a detailed evaluation of the remedial performance/progress and conclusions with respect to achieving the remediation goals of the ISCO treatment program will be presented in a subsequent submittal.

Page 18: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

FIGURES

Page 19: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Figure 1

IA-1 Building 55 Area

Page 20: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

FILE: E:\Roche\NutleyNJ\2013_198233\198233-737.mxd, DATE: 4/14/2016 10:20:42 AM

Hoffmann - La Roche Inc.340 KINGSLAND STREET NUTLEY, NEW JERSEY 07110-1199

PREPARED FOR

PROJECT TITLE

DRAWING NO.THIS DRAWING AND ALL INFORMATION THEREON IS THE PROPERTY OF HOFFMANN - LAROCHE INC. AND IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MUST NOT BE MADE PUBLIC OR COPIEDUNLESS AUTHORIZED BY ROCHE AND IS SUBJECT TO RETURN ON DEMAND.

DRAWING TITLE

DESCRIPTIONREV DATE BY

DESIGNSUPERVISORPROJECTENGINEER

500 0 500

1 INCH = 500 FEET

ENGINEER IN RESPONSIBLECHARGE OF THE WORKSHOWN ON THIS DRAWING

PROFESSIONALENGINEER:LIC. #

SIGNATUREDATE: _________________TRC ENVIRONMENTAL CORP.41 SPRING STREETNEW PROVIDENCE, NJ 07974908.988.1700

INITIATOR DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

START DATE SUPERVISORPROJECT ENGINEER

SCALE

BLDG. NO.

Route 3

Kingsland St

Bloo

mfield

Ave

Passaic

Ave

Cathed

ralAve

Al lwood RdW Passaic Ave

Darl i

ngAve

Frankl in

Ave

Edison Ave

Paters

on Ave

Cadmus St

N Spring Garden Ave

Norman St

Oakley

Ter

Essex

St

Reigate Rd

Coeyman Ave

High St

Dwasline

Rd

Darling Ave

Colin Ave

Elm Pl

Ardmore

Ave

Hollywood

Ave

Daily St

Carol

Ln

Wan da Ct

Alyson Pl

Lois Ave

Lake S

t

Sylvan Rd

Ward Ave

Knollwood Ter

Evans Rd

Spruce St

S Spring Garden Ave

School

Ln

Yale St

Hillside Ave

Terrace

Ave

Windsor

Pl

GlendaleSt

Ferncliff Rd

Frankl

in Ave

Pri nceton St

Princeton Pl

Joerg A

veCharles St

Garden

Pl

Duane Pl

Kensing

ton Ave

Cottage Pl

Rhoda A

ve

Ruth Ave

Alexand

er Ave

Jackson St

Renner A

ve

Kenzel A

ve

Mapes Ave

Brookd

ale Ave

Funsto

n Pl

Lehigh Ave

Emily AveLaura Ave

Hawthorne Ave

Montclair Ave

North AveOver

look T

er

Stanle

y Ave

Isabella St

IA-10

IA-1

IA-4

IA-5

IA-2

IA-3

IA-7

IA-6

IA-11

IA-13

IA-14

IA-15

IA-12

IA-9

104 40

36

46

62 113

100

1

34

86

42

73

8758

66A66B

5556

44

29

30

25

10

74

114

66

12

78 41

110

84

127

66C

31

2

21

79

48

47

59

43

106

70111

112

50

69

45

15

181716

13

28

125

45

88

85

68

7163

103

126T

52

53

115

120

117

COOLINGTOWER 80

76

1

119

39

102

7581

107

109

77

118

80A

123

61

123-600WING

116716

1 " = 500 '

B. RHODE3/1/2016

G. CIERPIALT. O'MEARA

NB-STE-S29215-C2513

IA-1

%P. FURTICK

J. RICE

LEGEND

ROCHE PROPERTY LINE

INVESTIGATION AREA BOUNDARY

CURRENT/REMAINING BUILDING

DEMOLISHED/SCHEDULED DEMOLISHED BUILDING

Project Location:IA-1 BUILDING 55 AREA

0

NUTLEY SITEREMEDIATION PROJECT

FIGURE 1IA-1 BUILDING 55 AREA

2015 IRM PROGRESS REPORT

Page 21: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Figure 2

Baseline VOC Concentrations IA-1 Building 55 Area

Page 22: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

FILE: E:\Roche\NutleyNJ\2013_198233\198233-738.mxd, DATE: 4/14/2016 10:20:10 AM

Hoffmann - La Roche Inc.340 KINGSLAND STREET NUTLEY, NEW JERSEY 07110-1199

PREPARED FOR

PROJECT TITLE

DRAWING NO.THIS DRAWING AND ALL INFORMATION THEREON IS THE PROPERTY OF HOFFMANN - LAROCHE INC. AND IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MUST NOT BE MADE PUBLIC OR COPIEDUNLESS AUTHORIZED BY ROCHE AND IS SUBJECT TO RETURN ON DEMAND.

DRAWING TITLE

DESCRIPTIONREV DATE BY

DESIGNSUPERVISORPROJECTENGINEER

100 0 100

1 INCH = 100 FEET

ENGINEER IN RESPONSIBLECHARGE OF THE WORKSHOWN ON THIS DRAWING

PROFESSIONALENGINEER:LIC. #

SIGNATUREDATE: _________________TRC ENVIRONMENTAL CORP.41 SPRING STREETNEW PROVIDENCE, NJ 07974908.988.1700

INITIATOR DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

START DATE SUPERVISORPROJECT ENGINEER

SCALE

BLDG. NO.

! (

! (! ( ! (

! (! (

! (

! (

ST3

Windsor

Pl

MW-1Benz: <0.24Tol: <0.16CF: <0.19MC: <0.73

MW-255BBenz: 0.78Tol: <0.16CF: <0.19MC: <0.73

MW-256BBenz: 0.93Tol: <0.16CF: <0.19MC: <0.73

MW-390ABenz: <0.24Tol: <0.16CF: <0.19MC: <0.73

MW-391ABenz: <0.24Tol: 0.18 JCF: <0.19MC: <0.73 MW-392A

Benz: <0.24Tol: <0.16CF: 0.42 JMC: <0.73

MW-254ABenz: <42Tol: 22400CF: <41MC: <160

MW-255ABenz: 71Tol: <5.5

CF: 4710MC: 52.4

IA-10

IA-1IA-4

IA-5

IA-2

IA-6

IA-12

IA-9

104

40

36

46

42

55

56

44

29

30

25

78

110

31

48

112

50

69

45

2888

103

52

39

39

61

138RI-MW1

186RI-MW4

23RI-MW1

66RI-MW6

66RI-MW7

MW-1A

MW-4

MW-20

MW-129

MW-136

MW-177MW-183

MW-185

MW-226A

MW-245

MW-254B

MW-256A

MW-282AMW-357A

MW-357-SBR

MW-368A

MW-369AMW-369-SBR

MW-371A

MW-372A

MW-385AMW-386A

MW-428A

PZ-01

131RI-MW1

179RI-MW1

186RI-MW1

186RI-MW2

186RI-MW3

22RI-MW1

23RI-MW2

66RI-MW4

66RI-MW5

66RI-MW8

MW-2

MW-4A

MW-20AR

MW-27

MW-30

MW-31

MW-32

MW-45

MW-59

MW-135

MW-137

MW-182MW-183AR

MW-184MW-185AR

MW-200

MW-235

MW-237A

MW-259A

MW-283A

MW-284A

MW-285A

MW-286A

MW-287A

MW-354A

MW-355A

MW-356A

MW-370A

MW-384A MW-387A

MW-388AMW-389A

MW-393A

MW-416A

MW-426A

MW-427A

MW-446A

MW-472AMW-472S

MW-473A

MW-474A

MW-476A

MW-485A MW-486A

MW-487AMW-487SMW-488A

MW-489A

MW-496AMW-496S

1 " = 100 '

B. RHODE3/1/2016 G. CIERPIALT. O'MEARA

IA-1

&0

NUTLEY SITEREMEDIATION PROJECT

FIGURE 2BASELINE VOC CONCENTRATIONS

IA-1 BUILDING 55 AREA2015 IRM PROGRESS REPORT

NOTES 1. MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS FROM MONITORING

WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS DATED JANUARY 15,2016.

2. ONLY RESULTS FROM VOCs THAT ARE IDENTIFIED ASCOCs FOR THE BUILDING 55 AREA ARE PRESENTEDON THIS FIGURE. GROUNDWATER DATA FROMMARCH/APRIL 2015.

LEGEND

! ( ZONE S1 MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS

! ( ABANDONED MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS

ROCHE PROPERTY LINE

INVESTIGATION AREA BOUNDARY

CURRENT/REMAINING BUILDING

DEMOLISHED/SCHEDULED DEMOLISHED BUILDINGMONITORING WELL SAMPLE RESULTS FOR SELECTED VOCs (LOW FLOW)MW-1Benzene: Concentration (µg/L)Toluene: Concentration (µg/L)Chloroform: Concentration (µg/L)Methylene Chrloride: Concentration (µg/L)MONITORING WELL SAMPLE RESULTS FOR SELECTED VOCs (PDB)MW-1Benzene: Concentration (µg/L)Toluene: Concentration (µg/L)Chloroform: Concentration (µg/L)Methylene Chrloride: Concentration (µg/L)

P.FURTICKJ. RICE

NB-STE-S29215-C2514

Page 23: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Figure 3

Excavation Locations IA-1 Building 55 Area

Page 24: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

FILE: E:\Roche\NutleyNJ\2013_198233\198233-739.mxd, DATE: 4/14/2016 10:19:34 AM

Hoffmann - La Roche Inc.340 KINGSLAND STREET NUTLEY, NEW JERSEY 07110-1199

PREPARED FOR

PROJECT TITLE

DRAWING NO.THIS DRAWING AND ALL INFORMATION THEREON IS THE PROPERTY OF HOFFMANN - LAROCHE INC. AND IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MUST NOT BE MADE PUBLIC OR COPIEDUNLESS AUTHORIZED BY ROCHE AND IS SUBJECT TO RETURN ON DEMAND.

DRAWING TITLE

DESCRIPTIONREV DATE BY

DESIGNSUPERVISORPROJECTENGINEER

100 0 100

1 INCH = 100 FEET

ENGINEER IN RESPONSIBLECHARGE OF THE WORKSHOWN ON THIS DRAWING

PROFESSIONALENGINEER:LIC. #

SIGNATUREDATE: _________________TRC ENVIRONMENTAL CORP.41 SPRING STREETNEW PROVIDENCE, NJ 07974908.988.1700

INITIATOR DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

START DATE SUPERVISORPROJECT ENGINEER

SCALE

BLDG. NO.

! (! (

! (

! (

! (! (

! (

! (

ST3

Windsor

Pl

4.75'

5'7.5'

3'IA-10

IA-1

IA-4

IA-5

IA-2

IA-6

IA-12

IA-9

10440

36

46

42

55

56

44

29

30

25

78

110

31

48

112

50

69

45

2888

103

52

39

39

61

138RI-MW1

186RI-MW4

23RI-MW1

66RI-MW6

66RI-MW7

MW-1A

MW-4

MW-20

MW-129

MW-136

MW-177MW-183

MW-185

MW-226A

MW-245

MW-254B

MW-256A

MW-282AMW-357A

MW-357-SBR

MW-368A

MW-369AMW-369-SBR

MW-371A

MW-372A

MW-385A

MW-386A

MW-428A

PZ-01

MW-254A

MW-255A

131RI-MW1

179RI-MW1

186RI-MW1

186RI-MW2

186RI-MW3

22RI-MW1

23RI-MW2

66RI-MW4

66RI-MW5

66RI-MW8

MW-2

MW-4A

MW-20AR

MW-27

MW-30

MW-31

MW-32

MW-45

MW-59

MW-135

MW-137

MW-182MW-183AR

MW-184MW-185AR

MW-200

MW-235

MW-237A

MW-259A

MW-283A

MW-284A

MW-285A

MW-286A

MW-287A

MW-354A

MW-355A

MW-356A

MW-370A

MW-384A MW-387A

MW-388AMW-389A

MW-393A

MW-416A

MW-426A

MW-427A

MW-446A

MW-472AMW-472S

MW-473A

MW-474A

MW-476A

MW-485A MW-486A

MW-487AMW-487SMW-488A

MW-489A

MW-496AMW-496S

MW-1

MW-255B MW-256B

MW-390A

MW-391A

MW-392A

1 " = 100 '

B. RHODE3/1/2016 G. CIERPIALT. O'MEARA

IA-1

&0

NUTLEY SITEREMEDIATION PROJECT

FIGURE 3EXCAVATION LOCATIONSIA-1 BUILDING 55 AREA

2015 IRM PROGRESS REPORT

NOTES 1. MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS FROM MONITORING

WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAIL S DATED JANUARY 15,2016.

LEGEND

! ( ZONE S1 MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS

! ( ABANDONED MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS

EXCAVATION AREAS WITH SOIL AMENDMENT

ROCHE PROPERTY LINE

INVESTIGATION AREA BOUNDARY

CURRENT/REMAINING BUILDING

DEMOLISHED/SCHEDULED DEMOLISHED BUILDING

P.FURTICKJ. RICE

NB-STE-S29215-C2515

Page 25: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Figure 4

January 2016 VOC Concentrations IA-1 Building 55 Area

Page 26: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

FILE: E:\Roche\NutleyNJ\2013_198233\198233-740.mxd, DATE: 4/14/2016 10:18:54 AM

Hoffmann - La Roche Inc.340 KINGSLAND STREET NUTLEY, NEW JERSEY 07110-1199

PREPARED FOR

PROJECT TITLE

DRAWING NO.THIS DRAWING AND ALL INFORMATION THEREON IS THE PROPERTY OF HOFFMANN - LAROCHE INC. AND IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MUST NOT BE MADE PUBLIC OR COPIEDUNLESS AUTHORIZED BY ROCHE AND IS SUBJECT TO RETURN ON DEMAND.

DRAWING TITLE

DESCRIPTIONREV DATE BY

DESIGNSUPERVISORPROJECTENGINEER

100 0 100

1 INCH = 100 FEET

ENGINEER IN RESPONSIBLECHARGE OF THE WORKSHOWN ON THIS DRAWING

PROFESSIONALENGINEER:LIC. #

SIGNATUREDATE: _________________TRC ENVIRONMENTAL CORP.41 SPRING STREETNEW PROVIDENCE, NJ 07974908.988.1700

INITIATOR DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

START DATE SUPERVISORPROJECT ENGINEER

SCALE

BLDG. NO.

! (! (

! (

! (

! (

! (

! (

ST3

Windsor

Pl

4.75'

5'7.5'

3'

MW-255BBenz: 0.55Tol: <0.16CF: <0.19MC: <0.73

MW-390ABenz: <0.24

Tol: <0.16CF: <0.19MC: <0.73

MW-391ABenz: 1.6Tol: <0.16CF: <0.19MC: <0.73 MW-392A

Benz: <0.24Tol: <0.16CF: <0.19MC: <0.73

MW-1Benz: <0.24Tol: <0.16CF: <0.19MC: <0.73

IA-10

IA-1

IA-4

IA-5

IA-2

IA-6

IA-12

IA-9

10440

36

46

42

55

56

44

29

30

25

78

110

31

48

112

50

69

45

2888

103

52

39

39

61

138RI-MW1

186RI-MW4

23RI-MW1

66RI-MW6

66RI-MW7

MW-1A

MW-4

MW-20

MW-129

MW-136

MW-177MW-183

MW-185

MW-226A

MW-245

MW-254B

MW-256A

MW-282AMW-357A

MW-357-SBR

MW-368A

MW-369AMW-369-SBR

MW-371A

MW-372A

MW-385A

MW-386A

MW-428A

PZ-01

MW-254A

MW-255A

131RI-MW1

179RI-MW1

186RI-MW1

186RI-MW2

186RI-MW3

22RI-MW1

23RI-MW2

66RI-MW4

66RI-MW5

66RI-MW8

MW-2

MW-4A

MW-20AR

MW-27

MW-30

MW-31

MW-32

MW-45

MW-59

MW-135

MW-137

MW-182MW-183AR

MW-184MW-185AR

MW-200

MW-235

MW-237A

MW-256B

MW-259A

MW-283A

MW-284A

MW-285A

MW-286A

MW-287A

MW-354A

MW-355A

MW-356A

MW-370A

MW-384A MW-387A

MW-388AMW-389A

MW-393A

MW-416A

MW-426A

MW-427A

MW-446A

MW-472AMW-472S

MW-473A

MW-474A

MW-476A

MW-485A MW-486A

MW-487AMW-487SMW-488A

MW-489A

MW-496AMW-496S

1 " = 100 '

B. RHODE3/1/2016 G. CIERPIALT. O'MEARA

IA-1

&0

NUTLEY SITEREMEDIATION PROJECT

FIGURE 4JANUARY 2016 VOC CONCENTRATIONS

IA-1 BUILDING 55 AREA2015 IRM PROGRESS REPORT

NOTES 1. MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS FROM MONITORING

WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS DATED JANUARY 15,2016.

2. ONLY RESULTS FROM VOCs THAT ARE IDENTIFIED ASCOCs FOR THE BUILDING 55 AREA ARE PRESENTEDON THIS FIGURE. GROUNDWATER DATA FROMJANUARY 2016.

3. MW-1 GROUNDWATER DATA FROM SEPTEMBER 2015.

LEGEND

! ( ZONE S1 MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS

! ( ABANDONED MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS

EXCAVATION AREAS WITH SOIL AMENDMENT

ROCHE PROPERTY LINE

INVESTIGATION AREA BOUNDARY

CURRENT/REMAINING BUILDING

DEMOLISHED/SCHEDULED DEMOLISHED BUILDINGMONITORING WELL SAMPLE RESULTS FOR SELECTED VOCs (LOW FLOW)MW-1Benzene: Concentration (µg/L)Toluene: Concentration (µg/L)Chloroform: Concentration (µg/L)Methylene Chrloride: Concentration (µg/L)MONITORING WELL SAMPLE RESULTS FOR SELECTED VOCs (PDB)MW-1Benzene: Concentration (µg/L)Toluene: Concentration (µg/L)Chloroform: Concentration (µg/L)Methylene Chrloride: Concentration (µg/L)

P.FURTICKJ. RICE

NB-STE-S29215-C2516

Page 27: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

TABLES

Page 28: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Table 1

Groundwater Sampling Measurements and Calculations – Low-Flow Purging

Page 29: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate
Page 30: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Table 2

Summary of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Groundwater

Page 31: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Sample No.: MW-1_LF10.75 MW-1-LF10.75 MW-254A-6.55 MW-255A-8.05 MW-255B_LF25.1

MW-255B_LF26.85

Date Sampled: 9/25/2015 4/22/2015 3/3/2015 3/9/2015 1/8/2016 9/25/2015LAB Sample ID: JC4842-10 JB93043-11 JB89202-30 JB89536-3 JC12282-5 JC4842-11

LAB: Accutest ACCUTEST ACCUTEST ACCUTEST Accutest AccutestParameter (ug/l) CAS No. GWQSAcetone 67-64-1 6000 3.3 U 3.3 U 530 U 66 U 3.3 U 3.3 UBenzene 71-43-2 1 0.24 U 0.24 U 42 U 71 0.55 0.94Bromochloromethane 74-97-5 100 0.37 U 0.37 U 97 U 12 U 0.37 U 0.37 UBromodichloromethane 75-27-4 1 0.23 U 0.23 U 56 U 7 U 0.23 U 0.23 UBromoform 75-25-2 4 0.23 U 0.23 U 62 U 7.8 U 0.23 U 0.23 UBromomethane 74-83-9 10 0.42 U 0.42 U 77 U 9.6 U 0.42 U 0.42 U2-Butanone (MEK) 78-93-3 300 5.6 U 5.6 U 500 U 62 U 5.6 U 5.6 UCarbon Disulfide 75-15-0 700 0.25 U 0.25 U 99 U 12 U 0.25 U 0.25 UCarbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1 0.22 U 0.22 U 47 U 5.9 U 0.22 U 0.22 UChlorobenzene 108-90-7 50 0.19 U 0.19 U 54 U 6.8 U 0.19 U 0.19 UChloroethane 75-00-3 5 0.34 U 0.34 U 110 U 14 U 0.34 U 0.34 UChloroform 67-66-3 70 0.19 U 0.19 U 41 U 4710 0.19 U 0.19 UChloromethane 74-87-3 100 0.41 U 0.41 U 66 U 8.3 U 0.41 U 0.41 Ucis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 70 0.27 U 0.27 U 65 U 8.2 U 1.2 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 -- 0.21 U 0.21 U 57 U 7.1 U 0.21 U 0.21 UCyclohexane 110-82-7 100 0.28 U 0.28 U 74 U 9.3 U 0.28 U 0.28 U1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96-12-8 0.02 0.99 U 0.99 U 230 U 29 U 0.99 U 0.99 UDibromochloromethane 124-48-1 1 0.15 U 0.15 U 50 U 6.2 U 0.15 U 0.15 U1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 0.03 0.23 U 0.23 U 45 U 5.7 U 0.23 U 0.23 U1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 600 0.19 U 0.19 U 32 U 4 U 0.19 U 0.19 U1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 600 0.23 U 0.23 U 51 U 6.4 U 0.23 U 0.23 U1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 75 0.27 U 0.27 U 47 U 5.9 U 0.27 U 0.27 UDichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 1000 0.9 U 0.9 U 150 U 18 U 0.9 U 0.9 U1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 50 0.17 U 0.17 U 70 U 9.8 J 3.6 5.61,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 2 0.18 U 0.18 U 60 U 7.5 U 0.18 U 0.18 U1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 1 0.51 U 0.51 U 99 U 12 U 2.7 51,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 1 0.39 U 0.39 U 87 U 11 U 0.39 U 0.39 U1,3-Dichloropropene (total) 542-75-6 1 ND U ND U ND U ND U ND ND U1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 0.4 1 U NA NA NA NA 64.8Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 700 0.27 U 0.27 U 79 U 9.9 U 0.27 U 0.27 U2-Hexanone 591-78-6 300 1.7 U 1.7 U 350 U 43 U 1.7 U 1.7 UIsopropylbenzene 98-82-8 700 0.23 U 0.23 U 51 U 6.4 U 0.23 U 0.23 UMethyl Acetate 79-20-9 7000 1.9 U 1.9 U 620 U 77 U 1.9 U 1.9 UMethyl Tert Butyl Ether (MTBE) 1634-04-4 70 0.24 U 0.24 U 53 U 6.6 U 8.3 10.64-methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 108-10-1 100 1 U 1 U 210 U 26 U 1 U 1 UMethylcyclohexane 108-87-2 100 0.22 U 0.22 U 43 U 5.4 U 0.22 U 0.22 UMethylene chloride 75-09-2 3 0.73 U 0.73 U 160 U 52.4 0.73 U 0.73 UStyrene 100-42-5 100 0.27 U 0.27 U 51 U 6.4 U 0.27 U 0.27 U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 1 0.21 U 0.21 U 79 U 9.9 U 0.21 U 0.21 UTetrachloroethene 127-18-4 1 0.4 U 0.4 U 70 U 8.8 U 0.4 U 0.4 UToluene 108-88-3 600 0.16 U 0.16 U 22400 5.5 U 0.16 U 0.16 Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 100 0.65 U 0.65 U 100 U 13 U 0.65 U 0.65 Utrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 -- 0.19 U 0.19 U 63 U 7.9 U 0.19 U 0.19 UFreon 113 76-13-1 20000 0.52 U 0.52 U 89 U 11 U 0.52 U 0.52 U1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 87-61-6 100 0.23 U 0.23 U 53 U 6.6 U 0.23 U 0.23 U1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 30 0.25 U 0.25 U 64 U 8 U 0.25 U 0.25 U1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 3 0.21 U 0.21 U 55 U 6.9 U 0.21 U 0.21 UTrichloroethene 79-01-6 1 0.22 U 0.22 U 50 U 6.2 U 0.24 J 0.53 JTrichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 2000 0.43 U 0.43 U 56 U 7 U 0.43 U 0.43 U1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 9 0.21 U 0.21 U 45 U 5.6 U 0.21 U 0.21 UVinyl Chloride 75-01-4 1 0.15 U 0.15 U 35 U 4.4 U 0.89 J 1.3m,p-Xylene 179601-23-1 -- 0.38 U 0.38 U 90 U 11 U 0.38 U 0.38 Uo-Xylene 95-47-6 -- 0.17 U 0.17 U 310 5 U 0.17 U 0.17 UXylenes (total) 1330-20-7 1000 0.17 U 0.17 U 310 5 U 0.17 U 0.17 UTotal VOC TIC SRP170 500 ND U ND U ND U ND U 110 J 55 J

GWQS = NJDEP's Ground Water Quality StandardBold indicates concentrations above the GWQSND = Not DetectedNA = Not AnalyzedJ = Estimated value below sample reporting limitU = Compound not detected above MDLValues in italics indicate MDL above applicable criterion.

TRC Project No. 105009Page 1 of 4 Report date: 7/11/2016 3:03:37 PM

Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. - Nutley, New JerseySummary of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Ground Water

Table 2

IA-1 Building 55

Page 32: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Sample No.: MW-255B-LF26.85

MW-256B-LF26.25

MW-390A_LF16.3

MW-390A_LF21.25

MW-390A_LF22.0

MW-390A-LF22.0

Date Sampled: 4/22/2015 4/29/2015 9/30/2015 9/30/2015 1/8/2016 4/21/2015LAB Sample ID: JB93043-12 JB93702-2 JC5262-3 JC5262-5 JC12282-3 JB93043-6

LAB: ACCUTEST ACCUTEST Accutest Accutest Accutest ACCUTESTParameter (ug/l) CAS No. GWQSAcetone 67-64-1 6000 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 UBenzene 71-43-2 1 0.78 0.93 0.24 U 0.24 U 0.24 U 0.24 UBromochloromethane 74-97-5 100 0.37 U 0.37 U 0.37 U 0.37 U 0.37 U 0.37 UBromodichloromethane 75-27-4 1 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 UBromoform 75-25-2 4 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 UBromomethane 74-83-9 10 0.42 U 0.42 U 0.42 U 0.42 U 0.42 U 0.42 U2-Butanone (MEK) 78-93-3 300 5.6 U 5.6 U 5.6 U 5.6 U 5.6 U 5.6 UCarbon Disulfide 75-15-0 700 0.25 U 0.25 U 0.25 U 0.25 U 0.25 U 0.25 UCarbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 UChlorobenzene 108-90-7 50 0.19 U 0.32 J 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 UChloroethane 75-00-3 5 0.34 U 0.34 U 0.34 U 0.34 U 0.34 U 0.34 UChloroform 67-66-3 70 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 UChloromethane 74-87-3 100 0.41 U 0.41 U 0.41 U 0.41 U 0.41 U 0.41 Ucis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 70 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 Ucis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 -- 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 UCyclohexane 110-82-7 100 0.28 U 0.28 U 0.28 U 0.28 U 0.28 U 0.28 U1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96-12-8 0.02 0.99 U 0.99 U 0.99 U 0.99 U 0.99 U 0.99 UDibromochloromethane 124-48-1 1 0.15 U 0.15 U 0.15 U 0.15 U 0.15 U 0.15 U1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 0.03 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 600 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 600 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 75 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 UDichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 1000 0.9 U 0.9 U 0.9 U 0.9 U 0.9 U 0.9 U1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 50 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 U1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 2 0.18 U 0.18 U 0.18 U 0.18 U 0.18 U 0.18 U1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 1 0.51 U 0.51 U 0.51 U 0.51 U 0.51 U 0.51 U1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 1 0.39 U 0.39 U 0.39 U 0.39 U 0.39 U 0.39 U1,3-Dichloropropene (total) 542-75-6 1 ND U ND U ND U ND U ND ND U1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 0.4 NA NA 340 331 NA NAEthylbenzene 100-41-4 700 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U2-Hexanone 591-78-6 300 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 UIsopropylbenzene 98-82-8 700 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 UMethyl Acetate 79-20-9 7000 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9 UMethyl Tert Butyl Ether (MTBE) 1634-04-4 70 0.24 U 0.24 U 0.24 U 0.24 U 0.24 U 0.56 J4-methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 108-10-1 100 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 UMethylcyclohexane 108-87-2 100 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 UMethylene chloride 75-09-2 3 0.73 U 0.73 U 0.73 U 0.73 U 0.73 U 0.73 UStyrene 100-42-5 100 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 1 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 UTetrachloroethene 127-18-4 1 0.4 U 0.4 U 0.4 U 0.4 U 0.4 U 0.4 UToluene 108-88-3 600 0.16 U 0.16 U 0.16 U 0.16 U 0.16 U 0.16 Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 100 0.65 U 0.65 U 0.65 U 0.65 U 0.65 U 0.65 Utrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 -- 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 UFreon 113 76-13-1 20000 0.52 U 0.52 U 0.52 U 0.52 U 0.52 U 0.52 U1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 87-61-6 100 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 30 0.25 U 0.25 U 0.25 U 0.25 U 0.25 U 0.25 U1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 3 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 UTrichloroethene 79-01-6 1 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 UTrichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 2000 0.43 U 0.43 U 0.43 U 0.43 U 0.43 U 0.43 U1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 9 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 UVinyl Chloride 75-01-4 1 0.15 U 0.15 U 0.15 U 0.15 U 0.15 U 0.15 Um,p-Xylene 179601-23-1 -- 0.38 U 0.38 U 0.38 U 0.38 U 0.38 U 0.38 Uo-Xylene 95-47-6 -- 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 UXylenes (total) 1330-20-7 1000 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 UTotal VOC TIC SRP170 500 17 J ND U ND U ND U ND U ND U

GWQS = NJDEP's Ground Water Quality StandardBold indicates concentrations above the GWQSND = Not DetectedNA = Not AnalyzedJ = Estimated value below sample reporting limitU = Compound not detected above MDLValues in italics indicate MDL above applicable criterion.

TRC Project No. 105009Page 2 of 4 Report date: 7/11/2016 3:03:37 PM

Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. - Nutley, New JerseySummary of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Ground Water

Table 2

IA-1 Building 55

Page 33: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Sample No.: MW-391A_LF15.3

MW-391A_LF20.25

MW-391A_LF21.0

MW-391A-LF21.0

MW-392A_LF24.25

MW-392A_LF25.0

Date Sampled: 9/28/2015 9/28/2015 1/8/2016 4/23/2015 9/25/2015 1/8/2016LAB Sample ID: JC4873-3 JC4873-6 JC12282-4 JB93292-5 JC4842-13 JC12282-6

LAB: Accutest Accutest Accutest ACCUTEST Accutest AccutestParameter (ug/l) CAS No. GWQSAcetone 67-64-1 6000 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 7.4 J 3.3 U 3.3 UBenzene 71-43-2 1 5.3 5.6 1.6 0.24 U 0.24 U 0.24 UBromochloromethane 74-97-5 100 0.37 U 0.37 U 0.37 U 0.37 U 0.37 U 0.37 UBromodichloromethane 75-27-4 1 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 UBromoform 75-25-2 4 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 UBromomethane 74-83-9 10 0.42 U 0.42 U 0.42 U 0.42 U 0.42 U 0.42 U2-Butanone (MEK) 78-93-3 300 5.6 U 5.6 U 5.6 U 5.6 U 5.6 U 5.6 UCarbon Disulfide 75-15-0 700 0.25 U 0.25 U 0.25 U 0.25 U 0.25 U 0.25 UCarbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 UChlorobenzene 108-90-7 50 0.19 U 0.95 J 0.54 J 0.65 J 0.33 J 0.19 UChloroethane 75-00-3 5 0.34 U 0.34 U 0.34 U 0.34 U 0.34 U 0.34 UChloroform 67-66-3 70 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 UChloromethane 74-87-3 100 0.41 U 0.41 U 0.41 U 0.41 U 0.41 U 0.41 Ucis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 70 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.29 J 0.47 Jcis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 -- 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 UCyclohexane 110-82-7 100 0.54 J 0.43 J 0.54 J 0.28 U 0.28 U 0.28 U1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96-12-8 0.02 0.99 U 0.99 U 0.99 U 0.99 U 0.99 U 0.99 UDibromochloromethane 124-48-1 1 0.15 U 0.15 U 0.15 U 0.15 U 0.15 U 0.15 U1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 0.03 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 600 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 600 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 75 0.68 J 0.7 J 0.3 J 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 UDichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 1000 0.9 U 0.9 U 0.9 U 0.9 U 0.9 U 0.9 U1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 50 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 U 1.3 0.92 J1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 2 0.18 U 0.18 U 0.18 U 0.18 U 0.18 U 0.18 U1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 1 0.51 U 0.51 U 0.62 J 0.51 U 1.2 1.11,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 1 0.39 U 0.39 U 0.39 U 0.39 U 0.39 U 0.39 U1,3-Dichloropropene (total) 542-75-6 1 ND U ND U ND ND U ND U ND1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 0.4 4.2 2.7 NA NA 29 NAEthylbenzene 100-41-4 700 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U2-Hexanone 591-78-6 300 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 UIsopropylbenzene 98-82-8 700 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 UMethyl Acetate 79-20-9 7000 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9 UMethyl Tert Butyl Ether (MTBE) 1634-04-4 70 0.85 J 0.61 J 0.34 J 0.24 U 1.9 2.24-methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 108-10-1 100 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 UMethylcyclohexane 108-87-2 100 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 UMethylene chloride 75-09-2 3 0.73 U 0.73 U 0.73 U 0.73 U 0.73 U 0.73 UStyrene 100-42-5 100 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U 0.27 U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 1 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 UTetrachloroethene 127-18-4 1 0.4 U 0.4 U 0.4 U 0.4 U 0.4 U 0.4 UToluene 108-88-3 600 0.16 U 0.16 U 0.16 U 0.18 J 0.16 U 0.16 Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 100 0.65 U 0.65 U 0.65 U 0.65 U 0.65 U 0.65 Utrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 -- 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 U 0.19 UFreon 113 76-13-1 20000 0.52 U 0.52 U 0.52 U 0.52 U 0.52 U 0.52 U1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 87-61-6 100 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U 0.23 U1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 30 0.25 U 0.25 U 0.25 U 0.25 U 0.25 U 0.25 U1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 3 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 UTrichloroethene 79-01-6 1 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 U 0.22 UTrichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 2000 0.43 U 0.43 U 0.43 U 0.43 U 0.43 U 0.43 U1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 9 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 UVinyl Chloride 75-01-4 1 0.15 U 0.15 U 0.15 U 0.15 U 0.43 J 0.15 Um,p-Xylene 179601-23-1 -- 0.38 U 0.38 U 0.38 U 0.38 U 0.38 U 0.38 Uo-Xylene 95-47-6 -- 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 UXylenes (total) 1330-20-7 1000 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 U 0.17 UTotal VOC TIC SRP170 500 ND U ND U 27 J 12 J ND U 53 J

GWQS = NJDEP's Ground Water Quality StandardBold indicates concentrations above the GWQSND = Not DetectedNA = Not AnalyzedJ = Estimated value below sample reporting limitU = Compound not detected above MDLValues in italics indicate MDL above applicable criterion.

TRC Project No. 105009Page 3 of 4 Report date: 7/11/2016 3:03:37 PM

Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. - Nutley, New JerseySummary of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Ground Water

Table 2

IA-1 Building 55

Page 34: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Sample No.: MW-392A-LF25.0

Date Sampled: 4/30/2015LAB Sample ID: JB93695-4

LAB: ACCUTESTParameter (ug/l) CAS No. GWQSAcetone 67-64-1 6000 3.3 UBenzene 71-43-2 1 0.24 UBromochloromethane 74-97-5 100 0.37 UBromodichloromethane 75-27-4 1 0.23 UBromoform 75-25-2 4 0.23 UBromomethane 74-83-9 10 0.42 U2-Butanone (MEK) 78-93-3 300 5.6 UCarbon Disulfide 75-15-0 700 0.25 UCarbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1 0.22 UChlorobenzene 108-90-7 50 0.21 JChloroethane 75-00-3 5 0.34 UChloroform 67-66-3 70 0.42 JChloromethane 74-87-3 100 0.41 Ucis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 70 0.27 Ucis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 -- 0.21 UCyclohexane 110-82-7 100 1.1 J1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96-12-8 0.02 0.99 UDibromochloromethane 124-48-1 1 0.15 U1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 0.03 0.23 U1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 600 0.19 U1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 600 0.23 U1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 75 0.27 UDichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 1000 0.9 U1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 50 0.17 U1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 2 0.18 U1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 1 0.51 U1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 1 0.39 U1,3-Dichloropropene (total) 542-75-6 1 ND U1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 0.4 NAEthylbenzene 100-41-4 700 0.27 U2-Hexanone 591-78-6 300 1.7 UIsopropylbenzene 98-82-8 700 0.23 UMethyl Acetate 79-20-9 7000 1.9 UMethyl Tert Butyl Ether (MTBE) 1634-04-4 70 1.34-methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 108-10-1 100 1 UMethylcyclohexane 108-87-2 100 0.22 UMethylene chloride 75-09-2 3 0.73 UStyrene 100-42-5 100 0.27 U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 1 0.21 UTetrachloroethene 127-18-4 1 0.4 UToluene 108-88-3 600 0.16 Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 100 0.65 Utrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 -- 0.19 UFreon 113 76-13-1 20000 0.52 U1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 87-61-6 100 0.23 U1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 30 0.25 U1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 3 0.21 UTrichloroethene 79-01-6 1 0.22 UTrichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 2000 0.43 U1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 9 0.21 UVinyl Chloride 75-01-4 1 0.15 Um,p-Xylene 179601-23-1 -- 0.38 Uo-Xylene 95-47-6 -- 0.17 UXylenes (total) 1330-20-7 1000 0.17 UTotal VOC TIC SRP170 500 63.6 J

GWQS = NJDEP's Ground Water Quality StandardBold indicates concentrations above the GWQSND = Not DetectedNA = Not AnalyzedJ = Estimated value below sample reporting limitU = Compound not detected above MDLValues in italics indicate MDL above applicable criterion.

TRC Project No. 105009Page 4 of 4 Report date: 7/11/2016 3:03:37 PM

Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. - Nutley, New JerseySummary of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Ground Water

Table 2

IA-1 Building 55

Page 35: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Appendix A

NJDEP Permit-By-Rule Authorization Correspondence

Page 36: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate
Page 37: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate
Page 38: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate
Page 39: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate
Page 40: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Appendix B

Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) of Injected Amendments

Page 41: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Material Safety Data Sheet U.S. Department of LaborMay be used to comply with OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard, 29 CFR 1910 1200. Standard must be consulted for specific requirements.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration(Non-Mandatory Form)Form ApprovedOMB No. 1218-0072

IDENTITY (as Used on Label and List)OBC (Oxygen BioChem)

Note: Blank spaces are not permitted. If any item is not applicable or no information is available, the space must be marked to indicate that.

Section I

Manufacturer’s name

REDOX TECH, LLC

Emergency Telephone Number 919-678-0140

Address (Number, Street, City, State and ZIP Code)

Telephone Number for Information 919-678-0140

200 Quade Dr, Cary NC 27513 Date Prepared January 2011Signature of Preparer (optional)

Section II—Hazardous Ingredients/Identity InformationHazardous Components (Specific Chemical Identity, Common Name(s)) OSHA PEL ACGIH TLV

Other Limits Recommended % (optional)

Mixture of :Calcium peroxide NA 1% to 49% Sodium Persulfate NA 51% to 99%

Section III—Physical/Chemical CharacteristicsBoiling Point

NASpecific Gravity (H20 = 1)

2.6 – 2.92

Vapor Pressure (mm Hg) NA pH 11.3 – 12.1 @ 25°C/ 1 hr

Vapor Density (AIR = 1) NA Evaporation Rate (Butyl Acetate = 1)

NA

Solubility in Water 18% (insoluble at 25°C); 73% (solubility @ 25°C)Appearance and Odor off-white fine granular solid, no odorSection IV—Fire and Explosion Hazard DataFlash Point (Method Used)Not applicable

Flammable Limits

LEL UEL

Extinguishing Media Use flooding quantities of water. Use water spray to keep fire exposed containers cool. Special Fire Fighting Procedures Use flooding quantities of water. Use water spray to keep fire exposed containers cool. Do not use carbon dioxide or other gas filled fire extinguishers; they will have no effect on decomposition. Wear full protective clothing and self-contained breathing apparatus.

Page 42: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Unusual Fire and Explosion Hazards: Product is non-combustible. Under fire conditions, may decompose and release oxygen gas, which may intensify fire. Presence of water accelerates decomposition. Mixtures with polysulfide polymers may ignite.

(Reproduce locally) OSHA 174 Sept. 1985

Section V—Reactivity DataStability Unstable Conditions to Avoid

Stable X Temperatures above 275 oC, moisture, reducing agents. Grinding with organics.

Incompatibility (Materials to Avoid) Oxidizer. Avoid strong acids, alkalis, halides (fluorides, chlorides, bromides and iodides), combustible materials, most metals and heavy metals, oxidizable materials, other oxidizers, reducing agents, cleaners, and organic or carbon containing compounds. Contact with incompatible materials can result in a material decomposition or other uncontrolled reactions. Hazardous Decomposition or Byproducts Oxygen that supports combustion and oxides of sulfur, nitrogen, and calcium hydroxide. Hazardous Polymerization May Occur Conditions to Avoid

Will Not Occur X

Section VI—Health Hazard DataRoute(s) of Entry Inhalation? Irritating to

resp. tract

Skin? May cause skin irritation

Ingestion? Irritation of the mouth and throat, may cause bowel movement

Health Hazards (Acute and Chronic) Eye contact. May cause irritation, risk of serious or permanent eye lesions.

Carcinogenicity None NTP? No IARC Monographs? No

OSHA Regulated? No

Signs and Symptoms of Exposure Irritation to eyes, nose, lungs, throat and skin upon contact. Exposure to high levels of dust may cause difficulty in breathing in sensitive persons. No significant long term inhalation hazard; irritation usually subsides after exposure ceases.

Medical Conditions Generally Aggravated by Exposure Persons susceptible or sensitive to eye and respiratory irritation

Emergency and First Aid Procedures Inhalation: Move to fresh air. If breathing difficulty or discomfort occurs and persists, obtain medical attention. Skin: Wash skin immediately with soap and water. Get medical attention if irritation occurs and persists. Eyes: Flush with water for at least 15 minutes, lifting the upper and lower eyelids intermittently. See a medical doctor or ophthalmologist immediately. Ingestion: Drink water and consult physician. Do not induce vomiting. Section VII—Precautions for Safe Handling and UseUse safety glasses and latex or nitrile gloves. Work in well ventilated area. Use respiratory equipment as needed.

Page 43: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Waste Disposal Method Can sweep up dry, or dissolve in water to allow the release of oxygen and dispose via a treatment system in accordance with governmental agencies regulations. Contact appropriate regulatory agency prior to disposal.

Precautions to Be Taken in Handling and Storing May release oxygen to support a fire - Do not store near ignition sources or at elevated temperatures. Keep dry (reacts with moisture). Avoid long storage times. Other Precautions Wear PPE when handling and keep containers tightly closed when stored. Provide ventilation to prevent release of dust into work environment.

Section VII—Control MeasuresRespiratory Protection (Specify Type) If ventilation inadequate or in confined space, use respirator with filter.Ventilation

Local Exhaust Standard HVAC conditions typically adequate

Special

Mechanical (General) Floor or stand fans OtherProtective Gloves Rubber or neoprene gloves. Eye Protection Cup type chemical goggles or full

face shield.Other Protective Clothing or Equipment Long sleeve shirt. Work/Hygienic Practices Do not eat, drink or smoke while handling. Remove/wash contaminated clothing before reuse.

Page 44: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Attachment 1

Accutest Laboratory Reports and NJDEP Electronic Deliverable Submission for Accutest Laboratory Reports (Compact Disc provided in NJDEP hard copy

only)

Page 45: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

NOTE FOR ATTACHMENT 1

The Laboratory Data Packages and Electronic Data Deliverables (EDDs) are part of the project file at the TRC New Providence office. CD(s) containing laboratory analytical reports and EDDs associated with the IA-1 Building 55 Area Progress Report were submitted to the NJDEP under Attachment 1 of this report. As required by the current Site Remediation Program Electronic Data Interchange Manual (February 21, 2013), the EDDs were also submitted electronically (via e-mail) to the NJDEP SRP ([email protected]). Copies of the e-mails, submitting the EDD files to the NJDEP, are attached.

Page 46: 7:9D-2 - ROCHE · PDF fileSoil Remedial Action Report – Investigative Areas (IAs) 1 and 5, TRC January 19, 2016). ... design and implement ISCO soil treatment programan to accelerate

Attachment 2

Full Digital Copy of Progress Report (Text, Figures, Tables, and Appendices)