9. lta logistics vs enrique varona (varona request of production for discovery)
DESCRIPTION
Now that we are going to trial I will need some EVIDENCE and information from LTA to prove its claim. This request of production was ignored by LTA attorney for over a year, but its a trap door that eventually will kick in....you'll see. Now we go into procedure and proof of claim the most difficult and usually fatal aspect of all SLAPP's. Stay tune this will be usefull down the road.TRANSCRIPT
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUITIN AND FOR MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA
GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION
CASE NO. 11 20527 CA 21
LTA LOGISTICS, INC.A Florida corporation, andLESTER TRIMINO,ANNETTE TRIMINO,LESTER TRIMINO SR.,
Plaintiff's and Defendant's in the counterclaim,
V.
Enrique Varona,
Defendant and Plaintiff in the counterclaim,
THE ORIGINAFILED ON:
NOV 1 6 2011
CIRCUIT COURT DADt CO
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO REQUEST PRODUCTION
COMES NOW, The Defendant and Plaintiff in the counterclaim, Enrique Varona, proceeding
pro-se, (from hereon, "Varona") a human person and not a corporate fiction or statutory
person, hereby requests that the Plaintiffs and Defendant's in the counterclaim, LTA
LOGISTICS, Inc., LESTER TRIMINO, ANNETTE TRIMINO, and LESTER TRIMINO SR. (From
hereon, "Trimino") produce pursuant to Rule 1.350 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure,
the following documents at the residence of Varona: 14823 S.W. 125 Court, Miami, Florida
33186, within (30) thirty days from the date of the mailing and/or emailing of this document
for the purposes of inspection, copying, and/or reproduction of the following:
Production Instructions
1. All documents pursuant hereto are to be produced as they are kept in the usual
course of business or shall be organized and labeled (without permanently marking
the item produced) so as to correspond with the categories of each numbered
request.
2. Each draft, final document, original, reproduction, and each signed and unsigned
document and every additional copy of such document were such copy contains any
commentary, note, notation or other change whatsoever that does not appear on the
original or on the copy of the one document produced shall be deemed and
considered to constitute a separate document.
3. Unless another time period is specified, this request for production is addressed to
documents created since June 2009 and ended on the date of compliance with the
Request for Production.
4. Pursuant to Rule 1.280(b)(4), of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, effective
January 1, 1997 if you object to providing any discovery or fail to fully or fail to
provide and production on the grounds of privilege or protection of trial preparation
material, you are required to:
a. Make the claim directly;
b. Describe the nature of the documents, communications, or things not produced
or disclosed in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or
protected, will enable the party propounding this Request for Production to
assess the applicability of the privilege or protection.
5. In any of the documents encompassed by the attached for production of documents
is/are deemed by you to be privileged, furnish all non privileged documents.
6. When appropriate, the singular form of a word should be interpreted in the plural as
may be necessary to bring within the scope hereof any documents which might
otherwise be construed to be outside the scope thereof.
Requested Documents
1. Any and all documents that in any way memorialize or refer to any statements of
any party to this action, his/hers/its agents, employees, or any independent
witness or witnesses, bearing on any knowledge or facts that are either relevant
or that could lead to admissible evidence in the above styled lawsuit.
2. Any and all documents upon which you now have in your possession or control,
and which you believe you will rely upon should this matter be tried.
3. All correspondence between Trimino and Landstar Logistics, Inc. upon which the
above styled action is based and any of Varona and Trimino.
4. Copy of any and all agreements between Trimino and his attorney that provide for
fees to be paid and copies of all cancelled checks paid to the attorney for fees.
5. Certified copy of the alleged Non disclosure & Non solicitation agreement
between Varona and Trimino dated November 5th of 2009. For signature forensic
examination purposes.
6. Copies of all load reports provided by Varona to Trimino on a weekly basis.
7. Copies of all checks paid to Varona by Trimino including all commissions.
8. Address of the following employees: Todd Osipiak, Cristina Davis, Sebastian
Nandino, Leticia (last name unknown), Vickie (last name unknown) for service of
court papers related to depositions and witness at trial.
9. Address of all former or current employees whether active or terminated of (LTA
LOGISTICS, INC.) Trimino who have been hired since March 2009 to the present
for service of court papers related to depositions and witness at trial.
10. Name and address of all the alleged customers, clients, accounts, future
customers, vendors, that Varona allegedly contacted or solicited or interfered
with that are the subject of Trimino's action for the alleged tortous interference
claim against Varona, for service of court papers related to depositions and
witness at trial.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the forgoing was mailed on
November 16, 2011 to Scott Egleston P.A., 12000 Biscayne Blvd Suite 220,
Miami, Florida 33181.
Respectfully submitted,
Enrique Varona1382lfs\W. 125 CourtMiami, Florida 33186
Enrioue aorm, pro-se
' /