9th grade instructional speaking rubric - argumentative - fi

Upload: kjsobotka

Post on 05-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 9th Grade Instructional Speaking Rubric - Argumentative - FI

    1/2

    Grade 9 Instructional Speaking Rubric (Last Revised 5/18/2012)Aligned to Next Generation West Virginia Content Standards and Objectives for English Language Arts and Literacy

    Smarter Balanced Claim 3: Students can employ effective speaking and listening skills for a range of purposes and audiences.

    ARGUMENTATIVE

  • 7/31/2019 9th Grade Instructional Speaking Rubric - Argumentative - FI

    2/2

    4Exemplary Exceeds Standard

    3Adequate Meets Standard

    2Partial Approaches Standard

    1Minimal Begins Standard

    StatementofPurpose/Focus

    The speaker effectively and consistentlyfocuses on a clearly identifiedpurpose and topic throughout effectively introduces precise,knowledgeable claim(s)

    effectively establishes thesignificance of the claim(s) clearly distinguishes the claim(s)from alternate or opposing claim(s) effectively anticipates theaudiences point of view:

    o knowledge level

    o concerns

    relative to the claim

    The speaker adequately focuses on anidentified purpose and topic

    adequately introduces precise,knowledgeable claim(s)

    adequately establishes thesignificance of the claim(s)

    distinguishes the claim(s) fromalternate or opposing claim(s)

    adequately anticipates theaudiences point of view:

    o knowledge level

    o concerns

    relative to the claim

    The speaker somewhat focuses on an identifiedpurpose and topic

    introduces claim(s), but claim(s)may be unclear and unfocused

    partially establishes thesignificance of the claim(s)

    somewhat acknowledges theexistence of alternate or opposingclaim(s) somewhat anticipates theaudiences point of view:

    o knowledge level

    o concerns

    relative to the claim

    The speaker shows a minimal focus on purposeand topic, and response may bevery brief shows an attempt to introduceclaim(s), but claim(s) may beconfusing or ambiguous does not establish the significanceof the claim(s) does not acknowledge theexistence of alternate or opposingclaim(s) shows a minimal consideration ofthe audiences point of view:

    o knowledge level

    o concerns

    relative to the claim

    Organization

    The speaker demonstrates a clear and effectiveorganizational structure that

    effectively and logically sequencesclaims, counterclaims, reasonsand evidence creating unity andcompleteness effectively and consistently uses avariety of transitional strategies(efficient and meaningful words,phrases and clauses, as well asvaried syntax) to:

    o link major sections of

    the texto make strong

    connections among ideaso clarify relationships

    between

    claims and reasons

    reasons and evidence

    claims andcounterclaims

    presents an effective introduction presents a powerful conclusionthat follows from and effectivelysupports the argument

    The speaker demonstrates an evidentorganizational structure that

    adequately sequences claims,counterclaims, reasons andevidence creating a sense ofcompleteness

    adequately uses transitionalstrategies (words, phrases andclauses, as well as varied syntax)with some variety to:

    o link major sections of

    the texto make adequate, if

    slightly inconsistent,connections among ideaso clarify relationships

    between

    claims and reasons

    reasons and evidence

    claims andcounterclaims presents an adequate introduction

    presents a conclusion that followsfrom and adequately supports theargument

    The speaker demonstrates an inconsistentorganizational structure that

    partially sequences claims,reasons and evidence with someevident flaws

    inconsistently uses basictransitional strategies (somewords, phrases or clauses) withlittle variety to

    o link major sections of

    the texto make limited

    connections among ideas

    presents a limited introduction presents a conclusion that partially

    and weakly supports the argument

    The speaker demonstrates little or nodiscernible organizational structure

    uses few or no transitionalstrategies (limited languagestructures) with frequentextraneous ideas that may intrude

    presents a minimal or nointroduction does not present a conclusion thatsupports the argument

    velopme The speaker presents and justifies claim(s) and

    counterclaim(s) fairly, thoroughly

    The speaker presents and justifies claim(s) andcounterclaim(s) fairly and

    The speaker presents claim(s) andcounterclaim(s) fairly

    The speaker attempts to present claim(s) andcounterclaim(s)