a brief institutional analaysis of social business as option for startups in nepal
TRANSCRIPT
In cooperation with:
Ingeborg Patsch
A brief In
stitutional
Analysis
of
Socia
l Busin
ess in N
epal
In cooperation with:
Underlying Theories
Kim Alter (2015) Christian Felber (2012)
In cooperation with:
Social Business Typology
In cooperation with:
Institutional Analysis
Based on Hollingsworth (2002)
In cooperation with:
Norms & Values• Ariely: social
norms and economic norms contradictory
Level 1 & 2 Institutional Arrangements
In cooperation with:
• Health Sector• Finance Sector• Business regulation• Social Business
Sector?• Social Busines
Regulations?
Level 3 & 4
7
15
4
23
3
72
4
2
Tentative distribution of Social Business in Nepal
Type A – Customer Type B - EmploymentType C - Supplier Type D - EnvironmentType E - Society
inside KTM-Valley: 31
outside KTM-valley: 18
In cooperation with:
Customer• Does it reach to customers, who really needs it? • Is it a synergic satisfier of basic human needs (Max-Neef)?
Environment• Is the product designed towards a cradle to cradle-principle? • If not: does it internalize environmental costs?
Employees• Can the level of income give security and sustain families?• Are the working conditions able to adjust to humans?
Level 5 (Common Good Matrix)
In cooperation with:
• SE reaching level 3 Sectors: embedding needed
• Level 4: More research: Lyne et al for Cambodia
• Measurement tools and incentives for Level 5
• Continuing dialog and academic reflection
Conclusion