a case study: the nepheline basanite ut- 70489 from bow hill in tasmania, australia previous work...
TRANSCRIPT
Crystal/melt partitioning of volatile and non-volatile elements during peridotite melting: implications for mantle fractionation
John Adam1*, Michael Turner1, Erik H. Hauri2 and Simon Turner1
1Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Macquarie University, N.S.W. 2109, Australia2Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5424 Broad Branch Road, Washington, D.C. 20005, USA
A case study: the nepheline basanite UT-70489 from Bow Hill in Tasmania, Australia
Previous work includes:• An experimental study of liquidus phase equilibria to determine conditions of garnet lherzolite saturation (~2.7 GPa and 1200 °C with 4.5 % of dissolved H2O and 2 % of CO2)
• A LAM-ICP-MS and electron micro-probe study of minor and trace element partitioning between peridotite minerals and the hydrous basanite melt
• A single-crystal X-ray and site refinement study of experimentally produced peridotite phases
Objectives• To produce a comprehensive and self-consistent set of peridotite/melt partition coefficients that include volatile as well as non-volatile elements
• To apply these data to the problem of intraplate magma genesis
Materials and methods
• Piston-cylinder experiments at 1.0-3.5 GPa and 1025-1190 °C using conventional methods
• H2O, C (as CO2), Cl, F, P and S by secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) at the Carnegie Institution of Washington.
• Major, minor and trace elements by electron microprobe and LAM-ICP-MS at Macquarie University, Australia.
Basanite UT-70489(an intraplate basalt & potential near-solidus melt of garnet lherzolite)
SiO2 44.30 plag 13.77
TiO2 2.36 or 12.41
Al2O3 11.44 ne 15.28
Cr2O3 0.08 di 25.47
Fe2O3 2.01 ol 21.43
FeO* 10.05 ilm 4.50
MnO 0.20 mag 3.83NiO 0.05
ap 3.31MgO 12.11CaO 9.46SrO 0.18Na2O 4.24K2O 2.09P2O5 1.43Total 100.00 100 x Mg/(Mg + Fe+2) = 68.2
Run R79 1075 °C 1.0 GPa
Run R80 1170 °C 3.0 GPa
glass quenched melt(porous crystallite
matrix)
olivine + cpx graphite inner capsule
Pt outer capsule
Pt outer capsule
pyroxenes
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 180
5
10
15
20
Determining H2O concentrations in experimental melts – a comparison of
estimates
from H2O/Laanalytical shortfallsby SIMS
H2O (wt. %) from mass balances of run products and starting materials
H2O
by
othe
r met
hods
1:1
H2O ppm F ppm
Clinopyroxene 608-1390 187-326Orthopyroxene 649-1211 82-149Olivine 94-166 19-34Garnet 216-352 26-35Pargasite 16900 4983Phlogopite 35100-39100 8177-10423
• Cl, S and C have negligible concentrations in nominally anhydrous silicate minerals
• Cl and S have small to moderate solubilities in amphibole and mica
• ~ 0.5 wt. CO2 is soluble in the melt phase at 1-2 GPa
clinopyroxene/melt partitioning of H2O
0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.4000.000
0.010
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.050
0.060
ivAl apfu
DH
2O c
px/m
elt
0 10 20 30 400.000
0.010
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.050
0.060 Bow Hill cpx
Southern Highlands
Kovacs et al. 2012
G & G 1998
Tenner et al. 2009
Aubaud et al. 2008
Aubaud et al. 2004
O'Leary et al. 2010
wt.% H2O in melt
DH
2O c
px/m
elt
orthopyroxene/melt partitioning of H2O
0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.2000.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
ivAl apfu
DH
2O o
px/m
elt
0 10 20 30 400
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
Bow Hill opx
Tenner et al. 2011
G & G 98
Tenner et al. 2009
Kovacs et al. 2012
Grant et al. 2007
Koga et al. 2003
Dobson et al. 1995
Aubaud et al. 2004
Green et al. 2000
wt.% H2O in melt
DH
2O o
px/m
elt
olivine/melt partitioning of H2O
0 10 20 30 400.000
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.010
0.012 Bow Hill
Southern Highlands
Kovacs et al. 2012
G & G 1998
Tenner et al. 2009
Aubaud et al. 2004
Tenner et al. 2011
Koga et al. 2003
Grant et al. 2007
Novella et al. (2014)
wt.% H2O in melt
DH
2O o
livin
e/m
elt
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.00.000
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.010
0.012
Pressure (GPa)
DH
2O o
livin
e/m
elt
Garnet/melt partitioning
5 10 15 20 25 300
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.007
0.008
0.009 Bow Hill
Hauri et al. (2006)
Aubaud et al. (2008)
Tenner et al. (2009)
Novella et al. (2014)
weight % H2O in melt
DH
2O g
arne
t/m
elt
Controls on crystal/melt partitioning
1. crystal-chemical effects• Tetraherally co-ordinated Al in pyroxenes
2. melt-activity relations• Burnham’s (1975) solution model for H2O in silicate
melts• Silver et al.’s (1990) solution model for H2O in silicate
melts
Effect of ivAl+3 in charge-balancing the addition of H+ to the pyroxene lattice
[pyx]H+ + [iv]Al+3 + [melt]Si+4
[melt]H+ + [melt]Al+3 + [iv]Si+4
KD = ሾ𝑐𝑝𝑥ሿ𝐻+ × ሾ𝑖𝑣ሿ𝐴𝑙+3 × [𝑚𝑒𝑙𝑡 ]𝑆𝑖+4 ሾ𝑚𝑒𝑙𝑡 ሿ𝐻+ × [𝑚𝑒𝑙𝑡 ]𝐴𝑙+3× [𝑖𝑣]𝑆𝑖+4
0 10 20 30 400.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
0.350Bow Hill cpx
Southern Highlands
Kovacs et al. 2012
G & G 1998
Tenner et al. 2009
Aubaud et al. 2008
Aubaud et al. 2004
O'Leary et al. 2010
wt.% H2O in melt
ivAl
apf
u in
cpx
Burnham’s speciation model for hydrous meltsmixing between OH- and 8-oxygen melt units
0 10 20 30 400.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
weight % H2O in melt
mol
e fr
actio
n O
H- i
n m
elt
0 10 20 30 400
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05 Bow Hill cpx
Southern Highlands
Kovacs et al. 2012
G & G 1998
Tenner et al. 2009
Aubaud et al. 2008
Aubaud et al. 2004
O'Leary et al. 2010
Ideal mixing of 8-oxygen melt units & OH
wt.% H2O in melt
DH2O
cpx/m
elt
KD = ሾ𝑐𝑝𝑥ሿ𝐻+ × ሾ𝑖𝑣ሿ𝐴𝑙+3 × [𝑚𝑒𝑙𝑡 ]𝑆𝑖+4 ሾ𝑚𝑒𝑙𝑡 ሿ𝐻+ × [𝑚𝑒𝑙𝑡 ]𝐴𝑙+3× [𝑖𝑣]𝑆𝑖+4
with KD = 0.0014
Silver et al.’s (1990) speciation model for hydrous meltsmixing between OH-, molecular H2O and O2-
0 10 20 300
5
10
15
20
25
30
weight % H2O in melt
wei
ght %
mol
ecul
ar
spec
ies
in m
elt
0 10 20 30 40-0.00999999999999997
2.60208521396521E-17
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05Bow Hill cpx
Southern Highlands
Kovacs et al. 2012
G & G 1998
Tenner et al. 2009
Aubaud et al. 2008
Aubaud et al. 2004
O'Leary et al. 2010
Stolper & Silver model
wt.% H2O in melt
DH2O
cpx/
mel
t
with DOHcpx/melt = 0.05
molecular H2O
OH-
• Melt activity relations as well as mineral composition play a role in the determination of mineral/melt (Nernst) partition coefficients for H2O
Comparisons with non-volatile elementsThere is a constancy of some volatile to non-volatile element ratios in intraplate (ocean island) and mid-ocean-ridge magmas
• H2O/Ce = 200 ± 50 (Michael 1995)o Higher ratios in Atlantic than Pacific, in some cases the correlation is better for La and/or varies with 87Sr/86Sr
• F/Nd• Cl/Ba, Cl/K• CO2/Nb, CO2/Ba
Similar mineral/melt partition coefficients during intra-mantle fractionation involving the migration of small-degree melts from local MORB sources?
Rb Ba K Cl Th UCO
2N
b Ta LaH2
O Ce Pb Sr FN
d Zr Hf Sm Ti Tb Lu
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100pa
rtitio
n co
effici
ent o
r M
ORB
-nor
mal
ized
va
lue
La
Average OIB (MORB-normalized)
Nd
H2O
F
Cl
Cl and F partitioning data from Dalou et al. (2012)
Garnet lherzolite/melt Partition coefficients
Crystal-chemical controls on DH2O/DCe
2.47 2.475 2.48 2.485 2.49 2.4950.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40Bow Hill
M2 site radius (Å)
DH
2O /
DCe
for C
px/M
elt
0.400 0.600 0.800 1.0000.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40Bow Hill
Southern High-lands
Ca (apfu) in Cpx
DH
2O /
DCe
for C
px/M
elt
2.38 2.39 2.4 2.41 2.42 2.430.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40Bow Hill
Southern High-lands
r0+3 M2 site cations + 1.38
DH2O
/DC
e fo
r Cpx
/Mel
tMust also consider the contributing influence of H2O concentrations in melts (significant for subduction zones)
ConclusionsDuring peridotite melting • DH2O/DCe increases with increasing pressure
and temperature (and therefore depth in the mantle), but decreases with increasing melt H2O
• Therefore - although coupled volatile and non-volatile element enrichments in OIB are consistent with peridotite/melt partitioning, this may require particular circumstances
Thank You
0.00001
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
Rb Ba K Cl Th U CO2 Nb Ta La H2O Ce Pb Sr F P Nd Zr Hf Sm Ti Tb Ho Lu
bulk partiti
on coefficient o
r rati
o
gt lherzolite/basanite melt
garnet lherzolite/H2O-fluid
intraplate basalts
C. Crust & Hydrosphere
Mexican Volcanoes
Fuego, Guatemala
Pinatubo, the Philippines
H2O Pb
La Ce
CO2
F
Clav. OIB normalized to av. MORB
DZperidotite/melt
The influence of ivAl on F in pyroxenes
0.040 0.060 0.080 0.100 0.120 0.1400
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
cpx
opx
ivAl apfu
ppm F in pyroxenes
The influence of Ti and melt H2O concentrations on OH in amphibole O3 sites
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
O2- at O3 (apfu)D
Ti a
mph
/mel
t
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0 5 10 15 20
melt H2O (wt. %)
O
2- a
t O
3 ap
fu
[melt]Ti+4 + 2[melt]O2- + [M1,3]Mg+2 + 2[O3]OH- [melt]Mg+2 + 2[melt]OH- + [M1,3]Ti + 2O3O2-