a comparison of the environmental consequences of power ...biomass igcc average coal 15% cofiring by...

19
Margaret K. Mann Co-author: Pamela L. Spath National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, Colorado USA A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power from Biomass, Coal, and Natural Gas

Upload: others

Post on 09-Aug-2020

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power ...Biomass IGCC Average coal 15% cofiring by heat input Biomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler 0.9 percentage point

Margaret K. MannCo-author: Pamela L. Spath

National Renewable Energy LaboratoryGolden, Colorado USA

A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power from Biomass,

Coal, and Natural Gas

Page 2: A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power ...Biomass IGCC Average coal 15% cofiring by heat input Biomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler 0.9 percentage point

Short discussion of life cycle assessment (LCA)

Purpose of LCAs conducted

System descriptions• Biomass IGCC• Average coal• Coal/biomass cofiring• Natural gas combined cycle

Comparative Results• Air emissions• Greenhouse gases• Energy

Outline of Presentation

Page 3: A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power ...Biomass IGCC Average coal 15% cofiring by heat input Biomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler 0.9 percentage point

Life Cycle Assessment: Definition

LCA is:• a systematic analytical method• used to quantify the environmental benefits and drawbacks

of a process• performed on all processes, cradle-to-grave, resource

extraction to final disposal• ideal for comparing new technologies to the status quo• helps to pinpoint areas that deserve special attention• reveals unexpected environmental impacts

(no show-stopping surprises)

Page 4: A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power ...Biomass IGCC Average coal 15% cofiring by heat input Biomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler 0.9 percentage point

Systems Examined

Indirectly-heated gasificationDedicated hybrid poplar feedstockZero carbon sequestration in base case

Pulverized coal / steam cycleIllinois #6 coal - moderate sulfur, bituminousSurface mining

Biomass IGCC

Average coal

15% cofiring by heat inputBiomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler0.9 percentage point efficiency deratingCredit taken for avoided operations including decomposition (i.e., no biomass growth)

Biomass / coal cofiring

Biomass residueAvoided emissions credit as with cofiring

Direct-fired biomass

Combined cycleUpstream natural gas losses = 1.4% of gross

Natural gas

Page 5: A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power ...Biomass IGCC Average coal 15% cofiring by heat input Biomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler 0.9 percentage point

Purpose of Studies

Biomass LCA was conducted to answer common questions:• What are the net CO2 emissions?• What is the net energy production?• Which substances are emitted at the highest rate?• What parts of the system are responsible for the greatest impacts?• What should biomass R&D focus on?

Coal and natural gas LCAs the foundation for quantifying the benefits of biomass power.

Direct-fired biomass system describes current biomass power industry.

Cofiring LCA examined near-term option for biomass utilization.

Each assessment conducted separately - common systems not excluded.

Page 6: A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power ...Biomass IGCC Average coal 15% cofiring by heat input Biomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler 0.9 percentage point

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.4

Dedicated BiomassIGCC

Average PC Coal Coal/biomass cofiring(15%)

Direct-f ired biomassresidue

Natural gas combinedcycle

g/kW

h

Operating plantTotal system

Life Cycle & Plant CO Emissions

Page 7: A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power ...Biomass IGCC Average coal 15% cofiring by heat input Biomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler 0.9 percentage point

Life Cycle & Plant Particulate Emissions

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00

Dedicated BiomassIGCC

Average PC Coal Coal/biomass cofiring(15%)

Direct-fired biomassresidue

Natural gas combinedcycle

g/kW

h

Operating plantTotal system

Page 8: A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power ...Biomass IGCC Average coal 15% cofiring by heat input Biomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler 0.9 percentage point

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

Dedicated BiomassIGCC

Average PC Coal Coal/biomass cofiring(15%)

Direct-fired biomassresidue

Natural gas combinedcycle

g/kW

h Operating plantTotal system

Life Cycle & Plant SO2 Emissions

Page 9: A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power ...Biomass IGCC Average coal 15% cofiring by heat input Biomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler 0.9 percentage point

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

Dedicated BiomassIGCC

Average PC Coal Coal/biomass cofiring(15%)

Direct-fired biomassresidue

Natural gas combinedcycle

g/kW

h

Operating plantTotal system

Life Cycle & Plant NOx Emissions

Page 10: A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power ...Biomass IGCC Average coal 15% cofiring by heat input Biomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler 0.9 percentage point

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Dedicated BiomassIGCC

Average PC Coal Coal/biomass cofiring(15%)

Direct-fired biomassresidue

Natural gas combinedcycle

g/kW

h Operating plantTotal system

Life Cycle & Plant NMHC Emissions

Page 11: A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power ...Biomass IGCC Average coal 15% cofiring by heat input Biomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler 0.9 percentage point

Life Cycle Air Emissions

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

CO Particulates SO2 NOx NMHCs

g/kW

h

Average PC CoalCoal/biomass cofiring (5%)Coal/biomass cofiring (15%)Natural gas combined cycleDirect-fired biomass residueDedicated Biomass IGCC

Page 12: A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power ...Biomass IGCC Average coal 15% cofiring by heat input Biomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler 0.9 percentage point
Page 13: A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power ...Biomass IGCC Average coal 15% cofiring by heat input Biomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler 0.9 percentage point
Page 14: A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power ...Biomass IGCC Average coal 15% cofiring by heat input Biomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler 0.9 percentage point

100 kg biomass (bone dry)(50.6 kg carbon)

46%landfilled

54%mulched

90.0 kg CO2(24.6 kg carbon)

90%aerobic

54 kg biomass(27.3 kg carbon)

14.8 kg CO2(4.05 kg carbon)

5.4 kg CH4(4.05 kg carbon)

46 kg biomass(23.3 kg carbon)

anaerobicdecomposition

50% to CO2

50% to CH4

40.5% capturedand combusted 59.5% released

as CH4

5.4 kg CO2(1.5 kg carbon)

2.9 kg CH4(2.2 kg carbon)

of the non-ligninlignin and 50%

resistant to degradation

15.2 kg carbon

degradation of50% of cellulose& hemicellulose

8.1 kg carbon

10% oxidizedby soil

microbes 1.5 kg CO2(0.4 kg carbon)

90% notoxidized by

soil microbes

4.9 kg CH4(3.65 kg carbon)

10%anaerobic

decomposition

3.6 kg CH4(2.7 kg carbon)

Avoided Biomass Decomposition

Avoided per 100 kg of biomass:111.7 kg CO2 + 6.5 kg CH4

= 248.2 kg CO2-equiv

If 100 kg biomass were to completely decompose aerobically: 185.4 kg CO2

Page 15: A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power ...Biomass IGCC Average coal 15% cofiring by heat input Biomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler 0.9 percentage point
Page 16: A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power ...Biomass IGCC Average coal 15% cofiring by heat input Biomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler 0.9 percentage point
Page 17: A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power ...Biomass IGCC Average coal 15% cofiring by heat input Biomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler 0.9 percentage point
Page 18: A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power ...Biomass IGCC Average coal 15% cofiring by heat input Biomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler 0.9 percentage point

Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions

-600

-400

-200

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Dedicatedbiomass

IGCC

AveragePC coal

Coal/biomassCofiring

NGCCGW

P( g

CO

- equ

ival

ent/

kWh)

2

Direct-firedbiomassresidue

Page 19: A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power ...Biomass IGCC Average coal 15% cofiring by heat input Biomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler 0.9 percentage point

Summary

Air emissions:• Biomass: few particulates, SO2, NOx, and methane• Coal: upstream CO and NMHC emissions lower• NGCC: system methane, NMHC, CO emissions high

Greenhouse Gases:• Biomass IGCC nearly zero net GHGs• Average coal system: ~1,000 g CO2-equiv/kWh• NGCC system: ~500 g CO2-equiv/kWh• Today’s biomass systems remove GHGs from

atmosphere• Cofiring: greater reduction than rate of biomass input