a competency- based training model for secondary schools in the municipality...

15
MARIA FE E. CANTOR, Ph.,D. School Principal II Researcher A COMPETENCY- BASED TRAINING MODEL FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF TUPI

Upload: vanliem

Post on 13-May-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

MARIA FE E. CANTOR, Ph.,D.School Principal II

Researcher

A COMPETENCY- BASED TRAINING MODEL FOR

SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN THE

MUNICIPALITY OF TUPI

RATIONALE

DepEd is committed to provide quality system of

public education.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

What were the levels of teaching performance of teachers ?

What Teacher Competency- Based Training Model for three public Secondary Schools in Tupi could be developed?

What were the levels of competency of teachers?

Tupi Cluster Secondary NAT Result 2013-2014

Name of School MPSKablon 64.91Tupi 63.33Emeliano P. Bacquial 62.13

Jose Escobillo 59.95Cebuano 57.89Polonuling 52.19Teodoro Prudente 52.17

SCOPE OF STUDY

Conceptual Framework

Research Design

DescriptiveQuantitative method

Respondents

59 National Item Teachers

Instruments

NCBTS-TSNAPAST

Statistical Tools

MeanSD

METHODOLOGY and RESEARCH DESIGN

RESULT and DISCUSSION

Level of Competencies of Teachers

D2.S2.2 D2.S 2.1 D7.S 7.3 D4.S 4.4 D4. S 4.7 D5. S 5.12.5

2.6

2.7

2.8

2.9

3

3.1 3.03 3.01 3.02

2.69

2.872.82

Mean

Performance Indicator Mean SD Descriptive Rating

I. Instructional Competencies 7.96 1.05 Very Satisfactory

II. Professional and Personal Characteristics 8.34 0.93 Very SatisfactoryIII. PUNCTUALITY AND ATTENDANCE (including meetings and required school activities)

8.08 1.20 Very Satisfactory

OVERALL 8.15 0.78 Very Satisfactory

Performance Indicator Mean SD Descriptive Rating

Learner’s Achievement 7.85 1.35 Very Satisfactory

Punctuality – number of times tardy during the rating period 7.86 1.82 Very Satisfactory

School Home and Community Involvement 7.95 1.06 Very Satisfactory

Level of Teaching Performance (PAST)

PAST Rating with Lowest Mean

The proposed Teacher Competency-Based Training Model for Secondary School in Municipality of Tupi was formulated emphasizing the three strands in the seven domains of NCBTS and three indicators in the PAST with the lowest mean value were prioritized to be included in the conceptualization of the Teachers’ Competency – Based Training Model.

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings of the study it is safe to conclude that the levels of competencies of teachers in all domains and strands of NCBTS are described as Experienced. It implies the need for continuous teachers’ training to improve the competency level from experienced to expert level; the teachers’ teaching performance in all indicators of PAST were Very Satisfactory except in indicator 2.10 proper attire/good grooming which is Outstanding. Result suggests the need for an ongoing follow-up training of teachers as administrative mechanism that will motivate teachers to work outstanding teaching performance.

RECOMMENDATIONS

That the proposed training model be utilized by Secondary School Heads in the formulation of plans and conduct of School Plan for Professional Development (SPPD).

That the same study be conducted with pre-assessment at the beginning of the school year and post assessment at the end of the same school year

I. ANALYSIS

NCBTS

Domain 4 Strand 4.7

Domain 5 Strand 5.1

Domain 4 Strand 4.4.

PAST

Learner’s Achievement

Punctuality

School Home and Community Involvement

TRAINING MODEL

Result implies that majority of the teachers has priority need training on the ff:

II. THE DESIGN

THE ADDIE MODEL

III. THE PROPOSED TRAININGS

The training design is good for three days to cover six topics.

IV. SCHEME OF IMPLEMENTATION

Teacher’s Participation

Logistical Support

.

.

V. EVALUATION

The training will be evaluated every end of the day and at the closing program.

Annual general evaluation of the teachers and the model by the principals and division supervisors

The High School Principals will be tasked to have a periodic evaluation of teachers based on the domains.

Analysis of the results of the evaluation

Repeat the cycle.

THANK YOU FOR LISTENING and GOOD DAY!