a congregation of electrons or are electrons conscious ?

41
A Congregation of Electrons or Are Electrons Conscious?

Post on 20-Dec-2015

230 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

A Congregation of Electrons

or

Are Electrons Conscious?

• All That Is wanted badly to experience totality.

• ATI created an infinite number of consciousness units (CUs) with which to experience totality.

• Seth: “Each unit of consciousness inherently possesses within itself all of the information available to the whole, and its specific nature when it operates as a particle rests upon that great ‘body’ of inner knowledge. Any one such particle can be where it ‘is’, be what it is, and be when it is, only because the positions, relative positions, and situations of all other such particles are known.” Session 890, Dreams, “Evolution”, and Value Fullfilment, Vol. 1, Jane Roberts, (Prentice-Hall, New York, 1986) p. 175.

• These CUs go on to form what Seth calls EE units, entities closer to physical matter. “In the deepest terms, again, your physical world is beginning at each point at which these units of consciousness assert themselves to form physical reality. . . . . Each unit of consciousness (CU) intensifies, magnifies its own intent to be—and, you might say, works up from within itself an explosive spark of primal desire that ‘explodes’ into a process that causes physical materialization. It turns into what I have called an EE unit, in which case it is embarked upon its own kind of physical experience.” op.cit.

• The EE units go on to form what appear to be quantum waves. Seth: “These EE units also operate as fields, as waves, or as particles, as the units of consciousness do—but in your terms they are closer to physical orientation. Their die is cast, so to speak: They have already begun the special kind of screening process necessary that will bring about physical form. They begin to deal with the kinds of information that will help form your world. ”

• “There are literally numberless steps taken before EE units combine in their own fashion to form the most microscopic physical particles, and even here the greatest, gentlest sorting-out process takes place as these units disentangle themselves at certain operational levels from their own greater fields of ‘information’, to specialize in the various elements that will allow for the production of atoms and molecules impeccably suited to your kind of world.” op.cit.

Review

• All That Is creates an infinite number of Consciousness Units to experience totality.

• These Consciousness Units combine to form Electromagnetic Energy Units.

• These Electromagnetic Energy Units combine to form particles.

• All particles have energy, and nearly all have mass as well.

• Particles may have “templates” or “spirits” which exist long before they materialize, and which may guide their materialization.

• Two basic kinds of particles exist:• Dirac particles, like electrons.• Bose-Einstein particles, like photons.

• Dirac particles are • Electron-like objects: the electron and its

neutrino, the mu and its neutrino, and the tau and its neutrino, and

• Quarks: the up, down, charmed, strange, top, and bottom.

• Bose-Einstein particles are • Photon-like objects: the photon, W+, W- ,

and Z0 .

• Yet physicists don’t know why there are so many of each kind, nor why they have the masses that they have.

• Three generations of elementary quarks and leptons.

• Their masses appear as Mc2 in MeV on left vertical axis.

• Four Bose-Einstein (EW bosons) also plotted.

• Each electron is aware of every other electron because they are made of CUs.

• All elementary particles possess free will, within the limits of their environments. Thus they might exhibit conscious behavior, contrary to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

Pauli Exclusion Principle

• Iron atom. Its 26 electrons all select different orbits. How do they know how to do that?

Electron entanglement

• Two electrons prepared in spin zero state. They separate. When one is measured, the other instantly knows.

• Each electron is initially in both spin up and spin down states. They separate to tens of kilometers. Then we measure the spin of one of them with a Stern-Gerlach apparatus. The electron must choose to be either spin up or spin down. The other electron then instantly chooses the opposite direction of spin. And thousands or millions of times faster than light could carry the message from one to the other.

• Both the Pauli Exclusion Principle and Electron Entanglement suggest that the electrons are aware of each other, as Seth says. “All possible visible or invisible particles possess consciousness.” DEVF I p. 137.

• Seth: “Animals also possess independent volition, and while I am emphasizing animals here, the same applies to any creature, large and small: insect, bird, fish, or worm; to plant life, to cells, atoms, or electrons. They possess free will in relationship to the conditions of their existence.

• DEVF I p. 270.

• Higher entities tell Bob Monroe,Maggy Harsch-Fischbach and others, that higher levels of consciousness (e. g., the Third and Fourth Levels) exhibit higher frequencies (), and physicists know that higher frequencies mean higher energies (E) of particles.– Max Planck’s formula

E =hh=6.63⋅10−34 Joule⋅second

• Seth says that consciousness, energy, and mass are equivalent. If so, then this linking of higher levels of consciousness with higher frequency may be our first indication that equates consciousness with energy.

Modeling the Universe

• Seth: “The universe is — and you can pick your terms — a spiritual or mental or psychological manifestation, and not, in your usual vocabulary, an objective manifestation. There is presently no science, religion, or psychology that comes close to even approaching a conceptual framework that could explain, or even indirectly describe, the dimensions of that kind of universe.

An eight-dimensional model of elementary Dirac particles.

• Warned by Seth that no present model can come close to modeling the universe, I will forge ahead anyway and tell you something about a model of quarks and leptons (electron-like objects) that I put together.

• The hydrogen atom

The Quark Model

• Murray Gell-Mann conceived the quark model in 1964.

• Elementary quarks and leptons again. Three generations all identical except that the higher generation get heavier.

• Two extra dimensions were known since 1936 but not taken literally.

Believing in the isospin sphere

• I imagine that the proto-type elementary particle is trapped in the isospin sphere, like a marble in a tin can.

• I improve on the model by replacing the tin can with a harmonic oscillator well. SU(3) multiplets appear: the 1, the 3, the six (not yet seen).

• Here are the lightest particles in 1, 4, and 10 multiplets. Isospin shows up as “up” or “down”.

How to visualize higher space

• Ordinary space reduced to just one dimension, the z. Higher dimensions reduced to two, the x twiddle and y twiddle. The confining well is now a circle.

• A human in one dimension would just be a string of a billion quarks and leptons trapped in a tube in the higher dimensions.

• A human consciousness need not be trapped in the tube. Might be able to wander out-of-body to see new stuff.

• There might, should, be other universes, with tunnels between them. “Light at the end of the tunnel?”

Extrasensory perception

• Information might easily propagate in extra dimensions when unable to do so in ordinary dimensions.

Joe McMoneagle

• Joe is one of the best remote viewers in the world, if not THE best. I had him look at elementary particles for me, because there was a cosmic ray that came in over Utah in 1991 that NOBODY can explain.

• To “calibrate” Joe, I had him “look” at a hydrogen atom. He got the question without open-ing the enve-lope.

• Next Joe gave a close-up view of the electron. See how the particle ghosts off on all sides, and has a spin.

• He sketched a spherical particle “ghosting off in two directions, but in reality in six directions”. This is exactly right. He should not have seen a particle, but rather a waveform or wavepacket peaking at a central point and dying out in all directions. This is the correct description of an electron localized in a high (Rydberg) orbit.

• Joe went on to report that portions of the particle were moving backwards in space-time. Right again. The electron's waveform is mathematically generated by the Dirac equation and is characterized by four wavefunctions, not one, with a pair of them telling the direction of the axis of spin (see below), and a different combination saying whether the particle has positive energy moving forward in time, or negative energy moving backward in time. (The latter is mathematically identical to its anti-particle, the positron, moving forward in time, and is usually identified as such.)

• Finally, in his picture of the electron, Joe showed each portion of the electron-waveform rotating about an axis through its center. Correct again. A fundamental feature of the electron is this intrinsic spinning motion. Its axis of rotation can be oriented in any direction in three-dimensional space. This may be what Joe meant when he wrote that "There are at least three rotational directions that might be affecting the particle".

Next I had Joe view a small radio-active sample. He drew this complex figure

• Finally I had Joe look at the cosmic ray that came in over Utah in 1991 with more energy than ever measured in any other ray, about 100,000,000 times more energetic that protons accelerated at Fermilab near Chicago. It should have lost energy absorbing Big Bang photons and emitting pi mesons, down to about 1/6 the energy that it actually had.