a coupled-mode technique for the transformation of ship...
TRANSCRIPT
A coupled-mode technique for the transformation of ship-generated
waves over variable bathymetry regions
K.A. Belibassakis*
School of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, Section of Ship and Marine Hydrodynamics,
National Technical University of Athens, P.O. Box 64033, Zografos, 15710 Athens, Greece
Received 28 July 2003; accepted 19 May 2004
Abstract
In the present work, a coupled-mode technique is applied to the transformation of ship’s waves over variable bathymetry regions,
characterised by parallel depth-contours, without any mild-slope assumption. This method can be used, in conjunction with ship’s near-field
wave data in deep water or in constant-depth, as obtained by the application of modern (linearised or non-linear) ship computational fluid
dynamic (CFD) codes, or experimental measurements, to support the study of wave wash generated by fast ships and its effects on the
nearshore/coastal environment.
Under the assumption that the ship’s track is straight and parallel to the depth-contours, and relatively far from the bottom irregularity,
the problem of propagation–refraction–diffraction of ship-generated waves in a coastal environment is efficiently treated in the frequency
domain, by applying the consistent coupled-mode model developed by Athanassoulis and Belibassakis [J. Fluid Mech. 1999;389] to the
calculation of the transfer function enabling the pointwise transformation of ship-wave spectra over the variable bathymetry region.
Numerical results are presented for simplified ship-wave systems, obtained by the superposition of source–sink Havelock singularities
simulating the basic features of the ship’s wave pattern. The spatial evolution of the ship-wave system is examined over a smooth but steep
shoal, resembling coastal environments, both in the subcritical and in the supercritical case. Since any ship free-wave system, either in deep
water or in finite depth, can be adequately modelled by wavecut analysis and suitable distribution of Havelock singularities e.g. as presented
by Scrags [21st Int. Conf. Offshore Mech. Arctic Eng., OMAE2002, Oslo, Norway, June 2002], the present method, in conjunction with ship
CFD codes, supports the prediction of ship wash and its impact on coastal areas, including the effects of steep sloping-bed parts.
q 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Ship-wave wash; Variable bathymetry; Coupled-mode model
1. Introduction
Waves generated by fast ships may produce detrimental
effects on the coastal environment, by damaging shoreline
property and disturbing or destructing marine operations
settled in the nearshore and/or coastal environment.
In addition, vessel wakes can be potentially harmful to
shallow water plant and animal life, and may not be
tolerated in closed and/or shallow waters, adjacent to
populated or environmentally sensitive areas. On the other
hand, the reduction of ship speeds in order to prevent wash
impact on the coast can hamper high-speed vessel
operations in coastal waters, e.g. short-sea shipping, that
depend on vessel’s speed for successful service.
Experience has demonstrated that high-speed ship wakes
can be dangerous to both humans and the natural
environment, and vessels with unsafe wakes cannot be
accepted in sensitive areas. To prevent this failure surveys of
environmental (as well as social and ecomomic) impacts
have been published [29], and ‘no harm’ criteria have been
established [30], assisting the design of low-wash vessels.
The importance of this subject in the EU is also evidenced by
recent projects, with main objectives to formulate compu-
tational fluid dynamics (CFDs) methods and software, in
order to assess the wave and wash making characteristics of
High-Speed Crafts (see, e.g. http://www.na-me.ac.uk/
research/ship_stab/flowmart.htm, Refs. [18,33]), as well as
to develop criteria covering the effects of wash-making on
the environment and means by which they can be minimised.
In general, the size and energy of any particular vessel
wake depends on numerous factors, such as the hull length,
0141-1187/$ - see front matter q 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.apor.2004.05.002
Applied Ocean Research 25 (2003) 321–336
www.elsevier.com/locate/apor
* Fax: þ30-210-7721397.
E-mail address: [email protected] (K.A. Belibassakis).
beam, draft, and shape, the ship’s speed and the vessel type
(e.g. monohull or multihull, displacement, surface piercing,
or planning). Moreover, coastal features and harbor
structures, shoreline distance, bed and shoreline
composition, water depth and bottom contours play an
important role. Many of the above factors are manageable
with today’s technology. Professional vessel design
optimization, selection of route, and effective vessel speed
management, can partially ensure the avoidance of proble-
matic wakes. Important considerations in preventing harm-
ful wakes is to ensure that the vessel design incorporates
proven (by either historically or rigorous design analysis)
low-wake features. Also, the speed schedule selected for the
ship’s route should be suited to the intended operating
region.
Although, there are various methods in use and under
development to define what is an environmentally accep-
table vessel wake, one of the simplest and most readily
understood is that shoreline waves generated by passing
vessels should not significantly exceed the size and energy
of naturally occurring waves in the area under consideration
[29]. This means that part of the study is concerned with the
study of propagation of ship waves towards the coast and the
evaluation of maximum amplitudes of the wave trains
formed by fast ships that reach the shoreline, taking
into account the effects of variable bathymetry and bed
slope [7,25,27].
One way to calculate the effects of variable bathymetry is
to include the irregular bottom surface to the boundary
integral representation of the ship-wave problem [25].
This approach, does not introduce any assumptions,
however, it leads to excessive computational cost, making
it difficult for systematic use. If the distance between the
ship’s track and the bottom irregularity is relatively large,
so that the effect of the variable bathymetry on the
generation of the ship waves can be neglected, another
approach to treat the ship-wash problem is by calculating
the propagation of all wave components in the ship-wave
spectrum, including the effects of refraction and diffraction.
This can be succeeded by coupling ship-wave codes with
coastal wave models [14,27,32 and the references therein].
A broad class of approximation techniques has been
developed for the interaction of free-surface gravity waves
with uneven bottom topography [10]. In the case when the
bed is mildly sloping in the region under consideration,
approximate mild-slope models, such as the classical
mild-slope equation [8], or the modified mild-slope equation
[9,15,19] can be used for the description of wave
propagation and diffraction, with applicability to shorter
waves, and Boussinesq-type models [4,22,24], with
applicability to longer waves.
All the above coastal wave models are suitable for
mildly sloped environments. A low-cost improvement of
mild-slope models, able to treat variable bottom
topography, without imposing assumptions concerning
bottom slope or curvature, is the consistent coupled-mode
model developed by Athanassoulis and Belibassakis [1] and
extended to three-dimensional by Belibassakis et al. [6].
In these works, a local-mode series is used for the
representation of the wave potential in the variable
bathymetry region, involving the propagating and
evanescent modes and including an additional term,
called the sloping-bottom mode, leading to a consistent
coupled-mode system of equations. This model is free of
any simplifications concerning the vertical structure of the
wave field and of any smallness assumptions concerning the
bottom slope and curvature, and it is consistent since it
enables the exact satisfaction of the sloping bottom
boundary condition. Moreover, the consistent coupled-
mode model provides a rapid convergence of the local-mode
series [2], and thus, a few terms are sufficient to accurately
calculate the velocity field up to the boundaries.
The purpose of the present work is to develop and test an
efficient coupled-mode technique for the transformation of
ship’s wave spectrum in variable bathymetry regions,
based on the ship’s near-field wave data in deep-water or
in constant-depth, as obtained by the application of modern
(linearised or non-linear) ship CFD codes, or from
experimental measurements, and permitting the study of
wave wash generated by fast ships and its effects on the
nearshore/coastal environment, without restrictions
concerning the smallness of the bottom slope and/or
curvature. The consistent coupled-mode model is applied
to the problem of propagation–refraction–diffraction of
ship-generated water waves in a coastal environment,
characterised by straight depth-contours parallel to the
ship’s track. The examined environment consists of a
transition region lying between two areas of constant but
different depth (Fig. 1). Owing to the stationarity of the
wave pattern in the ship-fixed frame of reference,
the problem can be treated in the frequency domain,
by transformation of the free-wave components contained
in the ship-wave spectrum in the deeper water subregion and
being obliquely incident to the variable bathymetry region.
A similar approach has been recently applied to random
wave transformation over variable bathymetry regions [3],
permitting the calculation of the point spectra of all physical
quantities of interest, and demonstrating significant
differences in comparison with the mild-slope
approximation.
Numerical results are presented for simplified ship-wave
systems obtained by the superposition of source–sink
Havelock singularities, simulating the basic features of the
ship’s wave pattern. The spatial evolution of the ship-wave
spectra is examined over smooth but steep shoals,
resembling coastal environments, both in the subcritical
and in the supercritical case. On the basis that any ship free-
wave system, either in deep water or in finite depth, can be
represented by wavecut analysis and suitable distribution of
Havelock singularities [11,28], the present model,
in conjunction with ship CFD codes, offers an efficient
and economic alternative for the study of wave wash
K.A. Belibassakis / Applied Ocean Research 25 (2003) 321–336322
generated by fast ships and its impact on the nearshore/
coastal environment, taking into account the effects of
variable bathymetry, including steep sloping-bed parts.
2. Formulation of the problem
We consider the coastal–marine environment shown in
Fig. 1. This environment consists of a water layer bounded
above by the free-surface and below by a rigid bottom. It is
assumed that the bottom surface exhibits an arbitrary
one-dimensional (1D) variation, i.e. the bathymetry is
characterized by parallel and straight bottom contours
lying between two regions of constant but different depth,
h ¼ h1 (deeper water region or region of incidence) and
h ¼ h3 (shallower water region or region of transmission).
A motionless Cartesian coordinate system {x; y; z} is
introduced, with its origin at some point on the mean water
level (in the variable bathymetry region), the z-axis pointing
upwards and the x-axis being normal to the depth-contours.
In this system, the liquid domain D is decomposed in to
three parts DðmÞ; m ¼ 1; 2; 3 (Fig. 1), defined as follows: Dð1Þ
is the subdomain characterized by x , a1 where the depth is
assumed to be constant and equal to h1; Dð3Þ is the
subdomain characterized by x . a2 ða1 , a2Þ where
the depth is also constant and equal to h3 , h1; and Dð2Þ is
the variable bathymetry subdomain, lying between Dð1Þ and
Dð3Þ: The depth function characterizing this environment
is then written in the following form
hðxÞ ¼
h1; x # a1
h2ðxÞ; a1 , x , a2
h3; x $ a3
8>><>>: : ð2:1Þ
The liquid is assumed homogeneous, inviscid and incom-
pressible. The wave field in the examined coastal area is
excited by the waves of a ship, moving with constant speed
U in the deeper water region Dð1Þ; with direction parallel to
the depth-contours. The ship’s track lies at a distance
bðb . la1lÞ from the origin of the earth-fixed system
{x; y; z} (Fig. 1). A ship-fixed coordinate system {x1; y1; z1}
is also introduced, which is steadily translated with respect
to the earth-fixed system {x; y; z}: The longitudinal axis of
the ship Ox1 is directed to the bow, the transverse axis is
Oy1; and the vertical axis Oz1: Thus
x ¼ 2b2 y1; y ¼ x1 þ Ut; z ¼ z1: ð2:2Þ
2.1. The ship free-wave system
Let us first consider the wave system of the ship, without
the effects of reflection/diffraction from the shoal, in the
constant-depth subregion Dð1Þ; as, e.g. obtained by the
solution of the steady ship problem in a horizontally infinite
strip of constant-depth h1: The wave system generated by
the steady forward motion of the vessel (Kelvin wave
pattern) remains stationary in the ship’s system of reference
Fig. 1. Domain decomposition and basic notation.
K.A. Belibassakis / Applied Ocean Research 25 (2003) 321–336 323
{x1; y1; z1}: Under the assumptions of irrotationality
and incompressibility, the fluid motion in the ship-fixed
frame of reference is described by the wave potential
Fðx1; y1; z1Þ; and in the absence of folding (wave breaking,
etc.), the deformed free-surface is described through the
single-valued free-surface elevation, z1 ¼ hðx1; y1Þ:
We shall first restrict ourselves to the case of linearised
steady ship waves, where the free-surface elevation is given
in terms of the wave potential on the free-surface as follows:
h ¼ hðx1; y1Þ ¼U
g
›Fðx1; y1; z1 ¼ 0Þ
›x1
: ð2:3Þ
For a particular free-wave1 component k1 of the ship-wave
system (Fig. 1), of frequency v; propagating at an angle u1
ð2p=2 , u1 , 0Þ with respect to the ship’s direction, and
thus, with direction u ¼ p=2 þ u1ð0 , u , p=2Þ with
respect to the x-axis (taken to be directed normal to the
shoal), the corresponding wave crests (or any other
constant-phase surface of this wave component) will appear
stationary with respect to the ship, only if its phase speed
appropriately matches the ship’s velocity
c ¼v
k1
¼ U cos u1; ð2:4Þ
where the wavenumber k1 ¼ lk1l is connected with the
(circular) frequency v through the linear dispersion relation.
In the region Dð1Þ of constant-depth h1 the latter has the form
v2 ¼ k1g tanhðk1h1Þ: ð2:5Þ
Combining the above equations we obtain
F2ncos2ðu1Þ ¼
tanhðk1h1Þ
k1h1
; ð2:6Þ
where Fn ¼ U=ffiffiffiffiffigh1
p¼ ðkh1Þ
21=2 denotes the bathymetric
Froude number in Dð1Þ; and k ¼ g=U2 is the characteristic
wavenumber parameter.
Eq. (2.6) imposes a specific restriction between the
frequency or the wavenumber and the direction of
each free-wave component k1 ¼ ðkx1; k
y1Þ (or ðk1; u1Þ or
ðv; u1Þ) of the Kelvin free-wave spectrum. This
particular relationship is illustrated in the wavenumber
space k1 ¼ ðkx1; k
y1Þ ¼ ðk1 cos u1; k1 sin u1Þ: defined as the
Fourier counterpart of the physical space ðx1; y1Þ correspond-
ing to the horizontal plane, by means of the dispersion curve
kx1 ¼ Kx
1ðky1Þ; where u1 ¼ tan21 k
y1=k
x1
� �: ð2:7Þ
Eq. (2.7) is parametrically dependent on Fn ¼ U=ffiffiffiffiffigh1
p:
The form of the dispersion curves (2.7) for various values
of the Froude number ranging from subcritical ðFn , 1Þ to
transcritical ðFn < 1Þ and supercritical ðFn . 1Þ; in the
k1-Fourier plane, is shown in Fig. 2. We recognize in this
figure the fact that in the supercritical case, in contrast to
the subcritical case, only free waves with directions above
(or below) the cut-off value ^cos21ð1=FnÞ are present.
Thus, the directions (in the earth-fixed frame of reference) of
Fig. 2. Dispersion curves for various (bathymetric) Froude numbers Fn ¼ 0:5; 0.95, 1.0, 1.1, and 1.25.
1 Outside the vicinity of the ship, where bound waves also exist, the free
waves constitute the dominant part of the free-surface deformation.
K.A. Belibassakis / Applied Ocean Research 25 (2003) 321–336324
the free-waves generated by the steady ship motion that are
able to propagate towards the coast are
0 , u ,p
2þ uco; ð2:8aÞ
where
uco ¼2cos21ð1=FnÞ; Fn . 1
0; Fn # 1
(: ð2:8bÞ
We also observe from the above relations that in the
subcritical case ðFn , 1Þ a cut-off value
vco ¼ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffikg tanhðkh1Þ
pð2:9Þ
of the angular frequency exists, corresponding to waves
propagating parallel to the depth-contours u ¼ p=2
(or parallel to the direction of the ship, u1 ¼ 0),
with ky1 ¼ 0 and kx
1 ¼ k ¼ g=U2:
The fact that the Kelvin free-wave pattern hðx1; y1Þ is
stationary in the ship fixed frame of reference, permits us to
introduce a two-dimensional (2D) Fourier transform and
obtain a representation of the free-surface elevation
through the corresponding amplitude spectrum Aðkx1; k
y1Þ;
in the k1-wavenumber space
hðx1;y1Þ¼1
ð2pÞ2Reð1
21dk
y1
ðþ1
21dkx
1Aðkx1;k
y1Þ
�expðiky1y1Þexpðikx
1x1Þ: ð2:10Þ
In Eq. (2.10), ReðsÞ denotes the real part, and ImðsÞ the
imaginary part, of the complex quantity s¼ReðsÞþ iImðsÞ;
where i¼ffiffiffiffi21
p: However, the functional dependence (2.7)
between the wavenumber components (or between
wavenumber and propagation direction) of the free ship
waves, in the ship-fixed frame of reference, permits the
simplification of the double Fourier integral to a single one,
by setting Aðkx1;k
y1Þ¼2pAðk
y1Þdðk
x12Kx
1ðky1ÞÞ; where d
denotes the Dirac-delta function. Using this relation, in
conjunction with the symmetry of the ship-wave pattern
with respect to the longitudinal axis
hðx1;y1Þ¼hðx1;2y1Þ and Kx1ðk
y1Þ¼Kx
1ð2ky1Þ; ð2:11aÞ
the representation of the ship’s free-wave pattern reduces to
the following form
hðx1;y1Þ¼1
2pReð1
21dk
y1Aðk
y1ÞexpðiKx
1ðky1Þx1Þcosðk
y1y1Þ;
ð2:11bÞ
see also Ref. [28].
The fact that the representation of the free-wave system
of the ship can be reduced to a 1D Fourier integral,
permitting the calculation of Kelvin wave spectra from
free-surface elevation data along a longitudinal cut
(parallel to the ship’s path), or along a transverse wavecut
behind the ship, has been first extensively discussed by
Eggers et al. [11]. This approach has been used by many
authors for determining the wavemaking characteristics
and the wave resistance of a ship’s hull [20,26]. The
same property has been also recently exploited by Scragg
[28] for the spectral analysis of ship-generated waves
in finite water depth. In the latter work, a method
has been developed to calculate an equivalent distribution
of finite-depth Havelock singularities, capable of
representing the far-field ship-wave system that closely
match any given wave data set, as, e.g. obtained along a
longitudinal cut parallel to the ship’s track at some
distance, where the effects of bound waves vanish. It is
shown in Ref. [28] that this approach, represents the free
ship-wave system quite well, and, although it is linear in
principle, it can be used not only with free-surface
elevation data coming from the linearised solution, but
also with wave data coming from non-linear ship CFD
codes, as well as with experimental data measured in a
wave tank.
2.2. Transformation of ship-wave spectra
The same fact is also exploited in the present work to
define the input spectrum (or the incident wave forcing) for
the calculation of the spatial evolution of ship-generated
waves in variable bathymetry regions, based on the ship’s
far-field wave data in deep water or in constant-depth. At a
particular longitudinal cut, relatively far from ship’s track in
Dð1Þ; e.g. at x ¼ a1ðy1 ¼ 2b2 a1Þ; also shown by using a
thick dashed line in Fig. 1, the ship-generated, freely
propagating waves are considered to be known in the
earth-fixed frame of reference
hðx ¼ a1; y; tÞ ¼ hðx1 ¼ y 2 Ut; y1 ¼ 2b2 a1Þ; ð2:12Þ
as obtained by the Kelvin wave spectrum (2.11), in the
ship-fixed frame of reference and using Eq. (2.2) to change
variables. Then, the signal of the free-surface elevation at
x ¼ a1; ignoring for the moment the reflection from the
coastal topography, remains stationary
hðx ¼ a1; y; tÞ ¼ hðx ¼ a1; y ¼ 0; t 2 y=UÞ
¼ hðx ¼ a1; y þ Ut; t ¼ 0Þ: ð2:13Þ
We use hIðyÞ ¼ hðx1 ¼ y; y1 ¼ 2b2 a1Þ to denote the ship
waves (at x ¼ a1) propagating obliquely incident to the
variable bathymetry, as, e.g. available from external
calculation or from measured data. Then, if the distance
between the ship and the bottom inhomogeneity is large,
so that the effect of the variable bathymetry on the
generation of the ship waves to be negligibly small,
the ship-wave-wash problem reduces to the calculation of
propagation, of all wave components j ¼ ðjxðjyÞ; jyÞ or
ðv; uðvÞÞ in the spectrum of hIðyÞ
AðjyÞ ¼ðy¼þ1
y¼21expð2ijyyÞhIðyÞdy; ð2:14Þ
taking into account the effects of refraction, diffraction,
and reflection due to variable bathymetry.
K.A. Belibassakis / Applied Ocean Research 25 (2003) 321–336 325
In accordance with the previous considerations, the free
ship-wave components in the earth-fixed frame of reference
obey the dispersion relation
F2n sin2ðuÞ ¼
tanhðk1h1Þ
k1h1
; ð2:15aÞ
where
jx ¼ JxðjyÞ ¼ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiðk1Þ
2 2 ðjyÞ2
q; ð2:15bÞ
and
u ¼ tan21ðjy=jxÞ [ ½0;p=2 þ uco�; ð2:15cÞ
in conformity with Eqs. (2.6) and (2.8).
Accordingly, in the framework of linear theory, the wave
field at any point in the nearshore environment ðx; yÞ [Dð2Þ < Dð3Þ can be obtained by Fourier synthesis
hðx; yÞ ¼1
2pRe
ðjy¼þ1
jy¼21AðjyÞHðxlJxðjyÞ; jyÞexpðijyyÞdjy;
ð2:16Þ
where HðxlJxðjyÞ; jyÞ ¼ Hðx; y ¼ 0lJxðjyÞ; jyÞ denotes
the transfer function associated with the free-surface
elevation in the variable bathymetry region. More
specifically, the function Hðx; ylJxðjyÞ; jyÞ describes the
transformation (with the effects of refraction, diffraction,
and reflection) of the free-surface elevation of a monochro-
matic incident plane wave of unit amplitude, characterised
by the wavenumber vector ðJxðjyÞ; jyÞ; or, equivalently, by
the angular frequency v and direction uðvÞ with respect to
the bottom contours (the oblique-incident wave).
In the present work, the transfer function H is calculated
using the consistent coupled-mode model developed by
Athanassoulis and Belibassakis [1] and extended to three
dimensions by Belibassakis et al. [6]. This model is based
on domain decomposition, in conjunction with the
representation of the wave potential in the two constant-
depth subdomains Dð1Þ and Dð3Þ by complete normal-mode
series, and in the variable bathymetry region Dð2Þ by a
rapidly convergent local-mode series. The present approach
treats the full wave problem and does not introduce
assumptions concerning the vertical structure of the wave
field. Thus, one of its important advantages, especially in
intermediate-to-shallow waters, is that it permits the
consistent transformation of the incident wave spectrum
over variable bathymetry regions and the calculation of the
spatial evolution of point spectra of all interesting wave
quantities (free-surface elevation, velocity, pressure),
at every point in the domain. Another aspect is that it can
be extended to treat weakly non-linear waves, and first
results towards this direction have been presented by
Belibassakis and Athanassoulis [5].
The application of the consistent coupled-mode model to
our problem is described in the following sections. Detailed
information concerning this model and its ability to
consistently treat wave propagation over non-mildly sloped
beds with remarkable efficiency can be found in Refs. [1,6].
The rapid convergence of the present coupled-mode
technique [2] facilitates its systematic use, and supports
the parametric study of wave wash generated by various
hulls of fast ships and its spatial evolution over sloping
bottoms, assisting the minimisation of its effects on the
nearshore/coastal environment, without imposing
assumptions concerning the magnitude of the bottom
slope and/or curvature.
3. Propagation of obliquely incident waves over variable
bathymetry
Harmonic waves of unit amplitude and angular
frequency v; the same as the frequency of each component
of the oblique-incident wave system, propagating at an
angle uðvÞ over the variable bathymetry, can be represented
by a velocity potential of the form
Fðx;y;z;tÞ¼Re 2ig
2vfðx;y;z;v;uðvÞÞexpð2ivtÞ
� ; ð3:1Þ
where g is the acceleration due to gravity. The function
f¼fðx;y;zÞ is the normalized potential in the frequency
domain. In our case, the function describing the
transformation (with the effects of refraction, diffraction,
and reflection) of the free-surface elevation at any point
ðx;yÞ on the horizontal plane is equal to the values of the
complex wave potential on the free-surface ðz¼0Þ
Hðx;ylJxðjyÞ;jyÞ¼fðx;y;z¼0Þ: ð3:2Þ
Under the assumptions of linearity, the wave potential
f¼fðx;y;zÞ is obtained as solution of the following
boundary value problem
›2
›z2þ72
!fðx;y;zÞ¼0; in D; ð3:3aÞ
›f
›z2mf¼0; m¼
v2
g.0 on z¼0; ð3:3bÞ
›
›zþ7h7
� �f¼0; on z¼2hðxÞ; ð3:3cÞ
in conjunction with the requirement fðx;y;zÞ and its
derivatives remain bounded as
R¼
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffix2þy2
q!1: ð3:3dÞ
In Eq. (3.3), 7¼ð›=›x;›=›yÞ is the horizontal gradient
operator and m¼v2=g is the frequency parameter. The above
problem is forced by the oblique-incident wave,
characterised by the potential
fIðx;y;zÞ¼expðiðjxxþjyyÞÞcoshðkð1Þ0 ðzþh1ÞÞ
coshðkð1Þ0 h1Þ;
ðx;y;zÞ[Dð1Þ:
ð3:4aÞ
K.A. Belibassakis / Applied Ocean Research 25 (2003) 321–336326
The wavenumber vector of the oblique-incident wave is
j¼jxiþjyj¼kð1Þ0 cosðuð1ÞÞiþkð1Þ0 sinðuð1ÞÞj; ð3:4bÞ
where kð1Þ0 ¼k1 is the positive root of the dispersion relation
mh1¼kð1Þ0 h1 tanhðkð1Þ0 h1Þ in Dð1Þ; uð1Þ ¼u denotes the
direction of the incident waves at x¼a1; Eq. (2.15), and
i; j denote the unit normal vectors along the horizontal axes x
and y, respectively.
We remark here the introduction of more complicated
notation for treating the problem of wave propagation in the
variable bathymetry region by means of our coupled-mode
model. Thus, we shall use an upper index within a
parenthesis to indicate the same quantity in the three
subdomains (the two constant-depth subdomains Dð1Þ and
Dð3Þ; and the variable bathymetry subdomain Dð2Þ). Also, a
lower index is introduced to denote the mode number. This is
imposed by the form of the modal series expansion of the
wave field, which contains, except of the propagating mode
(denoted by using the lower index n ¼ 0), also the
evanescent modes (denoted by using natural numbers
1,2,3…) that are generated by the interaction of the freely
propagating ship waves with the variable bathymetry.
In addition, in the variable bathymetry region, a newly
introduced term [1, Sec. 4] is present in the modal
expansion. This extra term, called the ‘sloping-bottom
mode’ (denoted by n ¼ 21) has support only on the
sloping-bottom parts, and is the tool for the consistent
satisfaction of the bottom boundary condition there,
providing a substantial acceleration of convergence of the
local-mode series.
Since the oblique-incident wave fIðx; y; zÞ is periodic
along the y-direction, the potential fðx; y; zÞ is also
y-periodic with the same wavelength l ¼ 2p=jy; where
jy ¼ kð1Þ0 sinðuð1ÞÞ [16,19]. Thus, by introducing partial
separation of variables
fðx; y; zÞ ¼ expðijyyÞwðx; zÞ; ð3:5Þ
we obtain the following 2D problem for the reduced wave
potential wðx; zÞ
72wðx; zÞ2 j2ywðx; zÞ ¼ 0; 2hðxÞ , z , 0; ð3:6aÞ
›wðx; zÞ
›z2 mwðx; zÞ ¼ 0; z ¼ 0; ð3:6bÞ
›
›zþ
dh
dx
›
›x
� �wðx; zÞ ¼ 0; z ¼ 2hðxÞ; ð3:6cÞ
supplemented by the following conditions at infinity
wðx; zÞ!½expðikð1Þ0 cosðuð1ÞÞxÞ
þ AR expð2ikð1Þ0 cosðuð1ÞÞxÞ�coshðkð1Þ0 ðz þ h1ÞÞ
coshðkð1Þ0 h1Þ;
x !21;
ð3:6dÞ
wðx; zÞ! AT expðikð3Þ0 cosðuð3ÞÞÞcoshðkð3Þ0 ðz þ h3ÞÞ
coshðkð3Þ0 h3Þ;
x !þ1:
ð3:6eÞ
In the last equations, AR and AT are the reflection and
transmission coefficients, respectively, and the direction of
the wave uð3Þ in Dð3Þ is given by Snell’s law
uð3Þ ¼ sin21ðkð1Þ0 sinðu1Þ=kð3Þ0 Þ; ð3:6fÞ
see also Ref. [19]. The wavenumbers kðmÞ0 ; m ¼ 1; 3;
appearing in Eq. (3.6) are obtained by the corresponding
dispersion relations
mhm ¼ kðmÞ0 hm tanhðkðmÞ
0 hmÞ; m ¼ 1; 3; ð3:7Þ
formulated at the depths hm; m ¼ 1; 3; respectively.
Finally, on the basis of Eqs. (3.2) and (3.5), we see that
the transfer function required in the integrand of the
right-hand side of Eq. (2.16) for the calculation of
the free-surface elevation in the whole variable bathymetry
region is given by the values of the reduced wave potential
on the free-surface, i.e.
HðxlJxðjyÞ; jyÞ ¼ wðx; z ¼ 0Þ: ð3:8Þ
4. The coupled-mode system of equations
The problem on wðx; zÞ; Eq. (3.6), is treated by means of
the consistent coupled-mode theory, based on the following
enhanced local-mode representation of the reduced wave
potential in the variable bathymetry region Dð2Þ
wð2Þðx; zÞ ¼ w21ðxÞZð2Þ21ðz; xÞ þ w0ðxÞZ
ð2Þ0 ðz; xÞ
þX1n¼1
wnðxÞZð2Þn ðz; xÞ; ð4:1Þ
and similar normal-mode representations in the two
constant-depth strips Dð1Þ and Dð3Þ: In Eq. (4.1), the term
w0ðxÞZð2Þ0 ðz; xÞ is the propagating mode. The remaining
terms wnðxÞZð2Þn ðz; xÞ; n ¼ 1; 2;… are the evanescent modes,
and the additional term w21ðxÞZð2Þ21ðz; xÞ; which exists only in
the variable depth region Dð2Þ; is a correction term called the
sloping-bottom mode, accounting for the bottom boundary
condition on the non-horizontal parts of the bottom.
The function Zð2Þn ðz; xÞ represents the vertical structure of
the nth mode. The complex amplitude of the nth mode wnðxÞ
describes its horizontal pattern. The functions Zð2Þn ðz; xÞ;
n ¼0; 1; 2;…; appearing in Eq. (4.1) are obtained as the
eigenfunctions of local vertical Sturm–Liouville problems,
K.A. Belibassakis / Applied Ocean Research 25 (2003) 321–336 327
formulated at the local depth hðxÞ; and are given by
Zð2Þ0 ðz; xÞ ¼
cosh½kð2Þ0 ðz þ hÞ�
coshðkð2Þ0 hÞ;
Zð2Þn ðz; xÞ ¼
cos½kð2Þn ðz þ hÞ�
cosðkð2Þn hÞ; n ¼ 1; 2;…;
ð4:2aÞ
where the eigenvalues {ikð2Þ0 ðxÞ; kð2Þn ðxÞ} are obtained as the
roots of the (local) dispersion relation
mh ¼ 2kh tanðkhÞ; a1 # x # a2: ð4:2bÞ
A specific convenient form of the function Zð2Þ21ðz; xÞ is given
by the polynomial
Zð2Þ21ðz; xÞ ¼ h
z
h
� �3
þz
h
� �2" #
; ð4:2cÞ
however, other choices are also possible [1]. By following
exactly the same procedure as in the latter work, and
using a similar variational principle, the following
coupled-mode system is obtained with respect to the
mode amplitudes wnðxÞX1n¼21
amnðxÞw00nðxÞþbmnðxÞw
0nðxÞþðcmnðxÞ2dmnamnðxÞj
2yÞwnðxÞ
¼0; a1,x,a2; m¼21;0;1;…; ð4:3Þ
where dmn is the Kronecker’s delta, and a prime denotes
differentiation with respect to x: See also Ref. [6].
The coefficients amn; bmn; cmn of the system (4.3) are
defined in terms of, Zð2Þn ðz;xÞ; and can be found in Table 1
of Ref. [1]. The system (4.3) is supplemented by the
following boundary conditions (see also Refs. [6,19]),
ensuring the complete matching on the vertical interfaces
at x¼a1 and x¼a2 separating the three subdomains Dð1Þ;
Dð2Þ and Dð3Þ
w21ða1Þ¼w021ða1Þ¼0; w21ða2Þ¼w0
21ða2Þ¼0; ð4:4aÞ
w00ða1Þþilð1Þ0 w0ða1Þ¼2ilð1Þ0 expðilð1Þ0 a1Þ;
w0nða1Þ2lð1Þn wnða1Þ¼0; n¼1;2;…;
ð4:4bÞ
w00ða2Þ2ilð3Þ0 w0ða2Þ¼0; w0
nða2Þþlð3Þn wnða2Þ¼0;
n¼1;2;3;…;
ð4:4cÞ
where the coefficients lð1Þn ; lð3Þn ; n¼0;1;2;…; are given by
lð1Þ0 ¼kð1Þ0 cosðuð1ÞÞ; lð1Þn ¼
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiðkð1Þn Þ2þðkð1Þ0 sinðuð1ÞÞÞ2
q;
n¼1;2;…
ð4:5aÞ
lð3Þ0 ¼kð3Þ0 cosðuð3ÞÞ; lð3Þn ¼
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiðkð3Þn Þ2þðkð3Þ0 sinðuð3ÞÞÞ2
q;
n¼1;2;…;
ð4:5bÞ
In the above equations,uð3Þ is defined by Eq. (3.6f), {ikð1Þ0 ;kð1Þn }
are the eigenvalues {ikð2Þ0 ðx¼a1Þ; kð2Þn ðx¼a1Þ};which remain
the same all over the region Dð1Þ; and {ikð3Þ0 ;kð3Þn } are the
eigenvalues {ikð2Þ0 ðx¼a3Þ; kð2Þn ðx¼a3Þ}; which also remain
the same all over Dð3Þ: The reflection and transmission
coefficients ðAR;ATÞ appearing in Eqs. (3.6d) and (3.6e) are
calculated from the solution of the coupled-mode system by
AR¼ðw0ða1Þ2expðilð1Þ0 a1ÞÞexpðilð1Þ0 a1Þ;
AT¼w0ða2Þexpð2ilð3Þ0 a2Þ:
ð4:6Þ
An important feature of the solution of the problem (3.6) by
means of the local-mode representation (4.1), is that the
latter exhibits a rapid rate of decay of the order Oðn24Þ
concerning the modal amplitudes lwnðxÞl: Thus, only a few
modes suffice to obtain a numerically convergent solution to
wðx;zÞ; for bottom slopes of the order of 1:1, and higher
[1,6].
The numerical solution of the coupled-mode system,
Eqs. (4.3) and (4.4), is based on the truncation of the system
(4.3) and the local-mode series (4.1), keeping the
propagating mode ðn ¼ 0Þ; the sloping-bottom mode
ðn ¼ 21Þ and a few evanescent modes ðn . 0Þ; and using
a second-order finite difference scheme to discretise the
system of differential equations (4.3) and the boundary
conditions (4.4). As an example of application of the present
coupled-mode model, we consider the case of a smooth
bathymetry, characterised by the following depth function
hðxÞ¼
h1¼4:9m; x,a1¼250m;
h1þh3
22
h12h3
2tanh
2:5px
a22a1
� �a1,x,a2;
h3¼0:5m; x.a2¼50m;
8>>><>>>:
ð4:7Þ
which models a smooth underwater shoal, with maximum
bottom slope smax¼8:6% and mean bottom slope
smean¼4:4%: A sketch of the bottom profile is shown in
Figs. 3(c) and 4 below.
In Fig. 3(a) and (c), the modulus and the phase of the
transfer function
Hmod ¼ lwðx; z ¼ 0Þl;
Hphase ¼ 2ilnðwðx; z ¼ 0Þ=HmodÞ;
ð4:8Þ
in the variable bathymetry region, 250 , x , 50 m; is
plotted by using contour lines, as calculated by the present
coupled-mode model. The case shown corresponds to a
subcritical Fn ¼ 0:743; corresponding to ship speed
U ¼ 10kn ¼ 5:15 m=s at the depth h1 ¼ 4:9 m: The
presentation is restricted to the range of frequencies from
the cut-off valuevco ¼ 1:85 rad=s; in this case (see Eq. (2.9)),
to an upper limit v ¼ 5:8 rad=s; after which the
free-wave components in the ship’s spectrum are practically
deep-water waves propagating nearly normally incident
ðu , 208Þ to the shoal. The corresponding dispersion curve
in the form v ¼ vðuÞ; is plotted in Fig. 3(b). For v . 5:8
rad=s; the contents of the free-wave spectrum are
K.A. Belibassakis / Applied Ocean Research 25 (2003) 321–336328
high-frequency waves propagating without interaction with
the seabed, and the modulus of the transfer function is
practically equal to one (see also Fig. 3a).
For the same environment, the calculated wave potential
fðx; y; zÞ; as obtained by the present method by truncating the
local-mode series (4.1) keeping only the first three modes
ðn ¼ 21; 0; 1Þ; which was found enough for numerical
accuracy, is illustrated by using equipotential lines in Fig. 4.
Both the distributions of the wave potential on the horizontal
and on the vertical planes are shown. The extension of
these lines on the vertical plane below the bottom boundary
ðz ¼ 2hðxÞÞ is maintained, in order to better visualise the
fulfilment of the bottom boundary condition, which is
equivalent to the fact that the equipotential lines intersect
the bottom profile perpendicularly. The effects of wave
refraction and shoaling are very well represented by the
present method, even by using only three terms, and can be
clearly observed in the figure.
5. Numerical Fourier inversion
The last step of the present calculation procedure deals
with the evaluation of the Fourier integral (2.16), providing
the free-surface elevation and the wave field over the
whole variable bathymetry region. In the present work,
this integration is efficiently performed by applying a
Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) technique [23].
The implementation of FFT is based on the discretisation
of the interval jy [ ½2J;J�; where J is appropriately
large, into an even number (2N) of equal-length segments,
with endpoints
jl ¼ 2Jþ ðl 2 1ÞDj;
l ¼ 1;…; 2N þ 1; where Dj ¼J
N:
ð5:1Þ
Also, the interval y [ ½2Y ; Y�; in the physical space, is
subdivided into the same number equal-length segments Dy;
as follows
yj ¼ 2Y þ ðj 2 1ÞDy; j ¼ 1;…; 2N þ 1;
where Dy ¼p
DjNand Y ¼ NDy ¼ p=Dj: ð5:2Þ
On the basis of the above, the integration in the right-hand
side of Eq. (2.16) over the finite interval j [ ½2J;J� is
written in the following discrete form
hðx;yjÞ<Dj
2pRe
X2N
‘¼1
A‘ exp ipð‘21Þðj21Þ
N
� �( );
j¼ 1;…;2N:
ð5:3Þ
Fig. 3. Calculated (a) modulus and (d) phase (in multiples of p) of the transfer function H ¼ wðx; y ¼ 0Þ; concerning ship waves at Fn ¼ 0:743 propagating
over the smooth shoal with depth profile given by Eq. (4.7), and shown in (c). In this case, the corresponding dispersion curve, in the form v ¼ vðuÞ; is shown
in the upper-right subplot (b).
K.A. Belibassakis / Applied Ocean Research 25 (2003) 321–336 329
In the above equation, A‘ ¼ Aðj‘ÞHðxlJxðj‘Þ; j‘Þ;
where Aðj‘Þ are the values of the amplitude spectrum AðjyÞ
at the points jy ¼ j‘; as obtained from the incident ship-wave
data along the longitudinal cut x ¼ a1 by means of Eq. (2.14).
The summation in Eq. (5.3) can be very efficiently
performed, simultaneously for all ranges y ¼ yj; by
applying FFT to the array {A‘; ‘ ¼ 1;…; 2N}; if N is
selected to be a power of 2. The problem with the application
of FFT (and of DFT, in general) is that undersampling in the
Fourier j-domain causes aliasing in the physical y-domain,
due to the periodicity assumed by the discrete Fourier
transform. Actually, the evaluation of the right-hand side
of Eq. (5.3) does not yield the values of the functionhðx; yjÞ; at
the points y ¼ yj; but ratherP1
n¼21 hðx; yj þ 2nYÞ [12].
Taking this fact into account, we obtain from Eq. (5.4)
the following result
hðx; yjÞ <Dj
2pRe
X2N
‘¼1
A‘ exp i2pð‘2 1Þðj 2 1Þ
2N
� �( )
2X1
n¼21n–0
hðx; yj þ 2nYÞ;
j ¼ 1;…; 2N:
ð5:4Þ
Thus, by selecting the sampling interval Dj to be fine
enough, so that Y also to be large, the aliasing effect from
(physical) ranges lyl . Y included in the second sum of
the right-hand side of Eq. (5.4) is made small, as a
consequence of the geometrical attenuation of the free-
surface elevation (and of the wave energy) at large y-ranges
on the horizontal plane. This, however, imposes a restriction
to the physical length of the input data used for specifying
the incident wave spectrum, that, usually, have to extend
many shiplengths behind the ship.
One way to further minimise the aliasing effect is offered
by shifting the contour of integration of Eq. (2.16) to the
complex jy-plane [21]. This kind of therapy has been used for
treating similar wave propagation problems, as, e.g. with
wavenumber integration techniques in underwater acoustics
problems [13, Ch. 4]. Such a treatment necessitates the
extension of our formulation, Eq. (3.6), to complex jy; which
is possible, and an analytic representation of the incident
wave hIðyÞ and of the associated amplitude spectrum AðjyÞ;
defined by Eq. (2.14). The latter becomes possible by
implementing spectral-analysis techniques based on singu-
larity distributions with an analytical structure, as [28], for
the representation of ship-wave system in the far-field, and
part of future work is planned towards this direction.
6. Numerical examples and discussion
In this section, we shall present numerical results
illustrating the spatial evolution of ship waves over
variable bathymetry regions and the associated
Fig. 4. Calculated wave potential over the shoal with bathymetry defined by Eq. (4.7), as obtained by the present method using three modes. The case shown corres-
ponds to harmonic waves of angular frequency v ¼ 2:7 rad=s; obliquely incident to the shoal with direction u ¼ p=4; also indicated by using an arrow. This pair
ðv; uÞ matches the dispersion curve of ship waves in the subcritical case Fn ¼ 0:743; corresponding to ship speed U ¼ 10kn ¼ 5:15 m=s at the depth h1 ¼ 4:9 m:
K.A. Belibassakis / Applied Ocean Research 25 (2003) 321–336330
horizontal ship-wave patterns, as obtained by the present
coupled-mode method. The basic input (forcing) is the
free-surface elevation hIðyÞ ¼ hðx1 ¼ y; y1 ¼ 2b2 a1Þ of
the ship-wave system along a longitudinal cut (x ¼ a1 or
y1 ¼ 2b2 a1) in the constant-depth subdomain Dð1Þ;
relatively far from the ship (at a distance of the order of
one characteristic wavelength), where the bound waves
are fading out and only free waves constitute the
associated amplitude spectrum AðjyÞ:
6.1. Simulation of ship-wave data
To test the present method artificial ship-wave data are
used for the specification of the incident wave, which are
easily obtained by the superposition of simple source–sink
Havelock singularities, simulating the basic features of the
ship’s free-wave system. The general expression of the
finite-depth Green’s function for a Havelock singularity,
located at ðx01; y01; z
01Þ in the ship’s frame of reference is
given by Refs. [31, Eq. (13.37),17, Eq. (2.177)]. It consists
of the free-space singularity and its mirror below the rigid
bottom (located at depth h1 in the constant-depth
subdomain Dð1Þ), a near-field contribution expressed by a
double integral and the wavelike far-field contribution
expressed by a single integral. Since we are interested in
the far-field pattern, we use only the far-field part of this
singularity, which for a source of strength s can be
expressed as follows
GFARðx1;y1;z1lx01;y01;z01Þ
¼s
pHðx012x1Þ
ðu1¼p=2
u1¼0du1 coshðk1ðz1þh1ÞÞ
�coshðk1ðz01þh1ÞÞsinðkx
1ðx12x01ÞÞcosðky1ðy12y01ÞÞ
ð6:1Þ
where H denotes the Heaviside unit step function and
k1¼ðkx1;k
y1Þ¼ðk1 cosu1;k1 sinu1Þ the wavenumber vector
obeying the dispersion relation (2.6) (see Section 2).
For source and field points on the undisturbed free-surface
ðz¼z01¼0Þ and the source at the centerline of the ship ðy01¼0Þ
the above expression simplifies considerably, and the far-
field becomes symmetric with respect to the Ox1 axis. In
this case, the associated free-surface elevation, as obtained
by Eq. (2.3) is
hFARðx1;y1lx01Þ¼sU
pgHðx012x1Þ
ðu1¼p=2
u1¼0du1Fðu1Þcosh2ðkh1Þ
�kx1cosðkx
1ðx12x01ÞÞcosðky1y1Þ; ð6:2aÞ
where
Fðu1Þ¼kþk1 cos2ðu1Þ
12kh1 sec2ðu1Þsech2ðu1Þsec2ðu1Þ
�sechðk1h1Þexpð2k1h1Þ; ð6:2bÞ
k¼g=U2:
As it is demonstrated by Scragg [28], the above expression
can be put in a more convenient form from the point of view
of numerical calculations, by changing the variable of
integration from u1 to ky1 using the relation k
y1¼k1 sinu1 and
Eq. (2.6). Accordingly, we obtain the following expression
hFARðx1;y1lx01Þ¼sUk
pgHðx012x1Þ
�ðk
y
1¼1
ky
1¼21
dky1
kx1
cos2ðu1Þ2kh1 sech2ðu1Þ
›u1
›ky1
�Re½expðikx1ðx12x01Þþ ik
y1y1Þ�; ð6:3aÞ
where
›u
›ky1
¼ k1 cosðu1Þ 1þð2k1=kÞ
2sin2ðu1Þcosh2ðk1h1Þ
sinhðk1h1Þcoshðk1h1Þ2k1h1
! !21
:
ð6:3bÞ
In the numerical results presented below, we use the above
formulae to simulate the forcing of the problem, obtained by
the superposition of a source and a sink with strengths ^s
located at a distance L apart each other, where L stands for the
characteristic ship’s length, i.e.
hIðyÞ¼hFARðx1;y1¼2b2a1lx01¼LÞ
2hFARðx1;y1¼2b2a1lx01¼0Þ: ð6:4Þ
However, this is not a restriction, since general data can be
used for the specification of the incident wave hIðyÞ; as, e.g.
are available from the output of ship CFD codes or from
experimental measurements. This enables the convenient
coupling of the present method with ship CFD codes and/or
experimental wave data.
6.2. Presentation of numerical results and discussion
The calculated ship-wave patterns and their
transformation over the variable bathymetry region for
two cases examined are presented in Fig. 5. We consider
a ship of length L ¼ 38 m (corresponding to a high-speed
small ferry), moving at speeds U ¼ 10kn ¼ 5:15 m=s and
U ¼ 17kn ¼ 8:75 m=s; respectively, in the shoaling
environment characterised by the depth function defined
by Eq. (4.7). The bathymetry profile is also plotted in the
vertical sections of Fig. 5, keeping the same scale with
the horizontal axes. The free-surface elevation is illustrated
by means of colorplots and the associated colorbars.
(However, since the source strength s has been arbitrarily
selected for simulating ship-wave data by means of
Eq. (6.3), the calculated free-surface elevation has only
relative value). In both cases, the ship’s path is taken to be
located at x ¼ 2100 m; in the constant-depth subregion Dð1Þ
ðx , 250 mÞ; where the depth is h1 ¼ 4:9 m: The first
case is a characteristic subcritical one, corresponding to
bathymetric Froude number Fn ¼ 0:743 and Froude number
based on ship’s length FnL ¼ U=ffiffiffiffigL
p¼ 0:267: The second
K.A. Belibassakis / Applied Ocean Research 25 (2003) 321–336 331
case is a characteristic supercritical one, corresponding to
Froude numbers Fn ¼ 1:263 and FnL ¼ U=ffiffiffiffigL
p¼ 0:453;
respectively.
In both cases, the incident free-surface elevation hIðyÞ is
simulated using Eqs. (6.3) and (6.4), along the longitudinal
cuts at x ¼ 250 m and x ¼ 2150 m; i.e. at a distance
(lateral offset) of 50 m from each side of the ship’s track.
These wavecuts are shown using dashed lines in Fig. 5.
Then, the incident wave information at x ¼ 250 m is
propagated and transformed by means of the present method
towards the shoal, in the region 250 , x , 50 m; where the
depth changes continuously from 4.9 to 0.5 m. Also, in
Fig. 5. Ship-wave patterns calculated by the present method (a) in the subcritical case Fn ¼ 0:743; corresponding to ship speed U ¼ 10kn at the depth
h1 ¼ 4:9 m (ships’ length L ¼ 38 m and FnL ¼ U=ffiffiffiffigL
p¼ 0:267), and (b) in the supercritical case Fn ¼ 1:263; corresponding to ship speed U ¼ 17kn at the
same depth ðFnL ¼ U=ffiffiffiffigL
p¼ 0:453Þ; with the effects of the bottom topography with depth function defined by Eq. (4.7). The dashed lines indicate the positions
of the longitudinal cuts where the input data hIðyÞ are specified, simulated using Eqs. (6.3) and (6.4).
K.A. Belibassakis / Applied Ocean Research 25 (2003) 321–336332
order to check the accuracy of our method, the same
wave data on the other side of the track of the ship
(at x ¼ 2150 m) are also numerically propagated by
applying the present method to the constant-depth subregion
2250 , x , 2150m; where the depth is constant and equal
to 4.9 m. Finally, for illustrating the overall compatibility of
the transformed data with the input data, in the same
colorplots of Fig. 5(a) and (b) the free-surface elevation in
the strip 2150 , x , 250 m (along the ship’s track) is also
overplotted, as calculated by integration using Eqs. (6.3)
and (6.4).
We can clearly observe in these plots the effects of
refraction and shoaling on the horizontal far-field patterns.
The main effect of refraction is the asymmetry of the
ship-wave pattern produced by the bending of
the wavefronts (or constant-phase surfaces) in the variable
bathymetry region. This is more observable with the
diverging waves (the only ones in the supercritical case),
which as propagate to more shallow waters become nearly
parallel to the depth-contours, as expected. On the other
hand, the main effect of shoaling is the increase or decrease
of the local wave amplitudes, depending on the specific
incident wave conditions and the bottom surface geometry.
Turning into more specific details, in Figs. 6 and 9,
the amplitude spectra AðkyÞ and the free-surface elevations
hIðyÞ associated with the incident wave are shown, as
calculated by Eqs. (6.3) and (6.4) along the longitudinal cuts
at x ¼ 250 m and x ¼ 2150 m (at lateral offsets 50 m from
the ship’s track), and corresponding to the subcritical case of
Fig. 5(a) and to the supercritical case of Fig. 5(b),
respectively. Also, for the same two cases, the ship-wave
(or wash) profiles, as calculated by the present method, at
symmetrically located longitudinal cuts on each side of the
ship are plotted in Figs. 7 and 8, respectively. The locations
of the wavecuts with respect to the ship’s track are at: (i)
x ¼ 250 m and x ¼ 2150 m (h ¼ 4:9 m), (ii) x ¼ 0 m
ðh ¼ 2:7 mÞ and x ¼ 2200 m ðh ¼ 4:9 mÞ; and (iii) x ¼ 50
m ðh ¼ 0:5 mÞ and x ¼ 2250 m ðh ¼ 4:9 mÞ:
We observe in Fig. 7 that, in the subcritical case, the
maximum wave amplitudes over the shoal, in comparison
with the ones in the constant-depth region ðh ¼ 4:9 mÞ
are slightly decreased, and their longitudinal position is
upwave shifted (towards the ship). The de-amplification of
the ship wash in the subcritical case examined is justified by
the fact that, in the frequencies involved in the incident
wave spectrum (shown in Fig. 6a), the transmission
coefficient, defined by Eq. (4.6), is very small, and the
transfer function, defined by Eq. (3.8) and plotted in Fig. 3,
is smaller than unity. On the contrary, in the supercritical
case shown in Fig. 8, the maximum wave amplitudes over
the shoal, in comparison with the ones in the constant-depth
region ðh ¼ 4:9 mÞ are slightly increased, and their
longitudinal position is downwave shifted (towards the
ship’s wake). The amplification of the ship wake wash at
Fig. 6. (a) Ship-wave amplitude spectrum AðkyÞ and (b) free-surface elevation hIðyÞ along the longitudinal cut at x ¼ 250 m (at a distance 50 m from ship’s
track), in the subcritical case of Fig. 5(a).
K.A. Belibassakis / Applied Ocean Research 25 (2003) 321–336 333
lower depths, in the supercritical case examined, is due to
the higher values of the transfer function and of the
transmission coefficient, associated with the lower
frequency components involved in the corresponding
amplitude spectrum (Fig. 9(a)).
In concluding this section, we remark that, in accordance
with the present development, the calculation of the transfer
function, which serves as the key for obtaining the spatial
evolution of the ship-wave spectra over variable bathymetry
regions, is based on the solution of the reduced 2D problem
Fig. 7. Ship-wave profiles at symmetrically located longitudinal cuts with respect to the ship’s track, for the subcritical case of Fig. 5(a).
Fig. 8. Ship-wave profiles at symmetrically located longitudinal wavecuts with respect to the ship’s track, in the supercritical case of Fig. 5(b).
K.A. Belibassakis / Applied Ocean Research 25 (2003) 321–336334
on the vertical plane, Eq. (3.6), for a number of frequencies.
This is accomplished by the solution of the coupled-mode
system of ordinary differential equations, Eq. (4.3), over the
horizontal x-axis. The reduction of dimensionality of the
problem, in conjunction with: (i) the rapid convergence of
the modal series (4.1), permitting the truncation of
the coupled-mode system into a small subset of equations;
and (ii) the application of the FFT scheme, Eq. (5.3), for the
numerical Fourier inversion, makes the present approach
very fast and economic from the computational point of
view, without introducing mild-slope assumptions.
For example, the calculations in the cases shown are
performed using Matlab in a Pentium IV, 2.4 GHz machine,
requiring computational time of the order of minutes.
This fact enables the systematic use of the present
method for the parametric study of wake wash in large
variable bathymetry domains, including steep bottom
features, as well as its application to hull-form optimisation
of high-speed vessels, taking into account the impact of
wake wash on the coastal environment.
7. Conclusions
In the present work, a cost-effective method is presented
for the transformation of ship’s waves over variable
bathymetry regions, characterised by parallel depth-
contours, supporting the study of wave wash generated by
fast ships and its impact on the nearshore/coastal
environment. The present method can be used in conjunc-
tion with ship’s near-field wave data in deep water or in
constant-depth, as obtained by the application of modern
(linearised or non-linear) ship CFD codes, or experimental
measurements in a wave tank.
Under the assumption that the ship’s track is parallel to the
depth-contours and relatively far from the bottom irregula-
rity, the problem of propagation–refraction–diffraction of
ship-generated waves in a coastal environment can be
conveniently treated in the frequency domain, by applying
the consistent coupled-mode model [1,6] to the calculation of
the transfer function enabling the transformation of ship-
wave spectra over variable bathymetry regions.
Numerical results are presented for simplified ship-
wave systems, obtained by the superposition of source–
sink Havelock singularities, simulating the basic features
of the ship’s wave pattern, over smooth but steep shoals
resembling coastal environments. Since any ship free-
wave system, either in deep water or in finite-depth, can
be adequately modelled by wavecut analysis and suitable
distribution of Havelock singularities [28], the present
model, in conjunction with ship CFD codes, supports the
prediction of ship wash and its impact on coastal areas,
including the effects of steep sloping-bed parts.
Future work is directed towards: (i) the prediction of run-
up of ship-waves in sloping beaches, including the effects of
weak non-linearity and dispersion; and (ii) the systematic
Fig. 9. (a) Ship-wave amplitude spectrum AðkyÞ and (b) free-surface elevation hIðyÞ along the longitudinal cut at x ¼ 250 m (at a distance 50 m from ship’s
track), in the supercritical case of Fig. 5(b).
K.A. Belibassakis / Applied Ocean Research 25 (2003) 321–336 335
use of the present method for the evaluation and hull-form
optimisation of high-speed vessels operating in coastal
waters.
Acknowledgements
The present work has been partially supported by the
Section of Ship and Marine Hydrodynamics of National
Technical University of Athens, in the framework of the
project ‘Wave Phenomena in the Sea and in the Coastal
Environment’.
References
[1] Athanassoulis GA, Belibassakis KA. A consistent coupled-mode
theory for the propagation of small-amplitude water waves over
variable bathymetry regions. J Fluid Mech 1999;389:275–301.
[2] Athanassoulis GA, Belibassakis KA. Rapidly-convergent local-mode
representations for wave propagation and scattering in curved-
boundary waveguides. In: Cohen G, Heikkola E, Joly P, Neittaanmaki
P, editors. Sixth International Conference on Mathematical and
Numerical Aspects of Wave Propagation (WAVES 2003), Finland.
Berlin: Springer; 2003.
[3] Athanassoulis GA, Belibassakis KA, Georgiou Y. Transformation of
the point spectrum over variable bathymetry regions. 13th Inter-
national Offshore and Polar Conference and Exhibition, ISOPE2003,
Honolulu, Hawaii, USA; 2003.
[4] Beji S, Battjes JA. Numerical simulation of nonlinear wave
propagation over a bar. Coast Eng 1994;23:1–16.
[5] Belibassakis KA, Athanassoulis GA. Extension of second-order
Stokes theory to variable bathymetry. J Fluid Mech 2002;464:35–80.
[6] Belibassakis KA, Athanassoulis GA, Gerostathis ThP. A coupled-
mode model for the refraction–diffraction of linear waves over steep
three-dimensional bathymetry. Appl Ocean Res 2001;23:319–36.
[7] Brizzolara S, Bruzzone D. Near field waves of fast ships at different
bottom depths. 10th International Congress of International Maritime
Association of the Mediterranean, IMAM 2002, Rethymnon, Crete,
May 2002.
[8] Berkhoff JCW. Computation of combined refraction–diffraction.
Proceedings of 13th Conference on Coastal Engineering, Vancouver,
vol. 2. New York: ASCE; 1972. pp. 471–90.
[9] Chamberlain PG, Porter D. The modified mild-slope equation. J Fluid
Mech 1995;291:393–407.
[10] Dingemans M. Water wave propagation over uneven bottoms.
Singapore: World Scientific; 1997.
[11] Eggers KWH, Sharma SD, Ward LW. An assessment of some
experimental methods for determining the wavemaking character-
istics of a ship form. Trans SNAME 1967;75:112–57.
[12] Geckinkli NC, Yavuz D. Discrete Fourier transformation and
its applications to power spectra estimation. Amsterdam: Elsevier;
1983.
[13] Jensen FB, Kuperman WA, Porter MB, Schmidt H. Computational
ocean acoustics. New York: AIP Press; 1994.
[14] Jiang T, Henn R, Sharma SD. Wash waves generated by ships moving
on fairways of varying topography. 24th Symposium on Naval
Hydrodynamics, Fukuoka, Japan; 2002.
[15] Kirby JT. A general wave equation for waves over rippled beds. J Fluid
Mech 1986;162:171–86.
[16] Kirby JT, Dalrymple RA. Propagation of obliquely incident waves
over a trench. J Fluid Mech 1983;133:47–63.
[17] Kostyukov AA. Theory of ship waves and wave resistance. Iowa:
Effective Communications Inc.; 1968.
[18] Kushan K, Wereskiold P, Zhao R. Experimental and theoretical
investigation of wake wash. Proceedings of FAST 2001, South-
ampton, UK; 2001.
[19] Massel S. Extended refraction–diffraction equations for surface
waves. Coast Eng 1993;19:97–126.
[20] Nakos DE, Sclavounos PD. Kelvin waves and wave resistance of
cruiser- and transom-stern ships. J Ship Res 1994;38(1):9–29.
[21] Noble B. Methods based on the Wiener–Hopf technique. New York:
Chelsea Publishing Company; 1988.
[22] Nwogu O. An alternative form of Boussinesq equations for nearshore
wave propagation. J Wtrwy, Port, Coast Ocean Eng 1993;119(6):
618–38.
[23] Oppenheim AV, Schafer RW. Discrete-time signal-processing.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1989.
[24] Peregrine DH. Long waves on a beach. J Fluid Mech 1967;27:
815–27.
[25] Raven HC, Hees van M, Miranda S, Pensa C. A new hull form for a
Venice urban transport waterbus: design and computational optimis-
ation. Seventh PRADS Symposium, Den Haag; 1998.
[26] Raven HC, Prins HJ. Wave pattern analysis applied to nonlinear ship
wave calculations. Workshop Water Waves and Floating Bodies,
March 29th–April 1st, Alphen a/d Rijn; 1998.
[27] Raven HC. Numerical wash prediction using a free-surface panel
code. RINA Conference on Hydrodynamics of High-Speed Craft.
Wake Wash and Motion Control, London, Nov. 2000.
[28] Scragg CA. Spectral analysis of ship-generated waves in finite-water
depth. 21st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and
Arctic Engineering, OMAE2002, Oslo, Norway, June 2002.
[29] Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers (SNAME). Ferry
Transit Systems for the Twenty First Century: A Survey of the Social,
Economic and Environmental Influences and Impacts of Ferry
Systems, with Specific Illustrative Examples from the San Fransisco
Bay Area, Jan. 2000.Available at http://www.sname.org.
[30] Stumbo S, Fox K, Elliot L. The prediction, measurement and
analysis of wake wash from marine vessels. Mar Technol 1999;36:
248–60.
[31] Wehausen JN, Laitone EV. Surface waves. Handbuch der Physik.
Berlin: Springer; 1960.
[32] Yang Q, Faltinsen OM, Zhao R. Wash of ships in finite water depth.
Proceedings of FAST 2001, Southampton, UK; 2001.
[33] Zaraphonitis G, Papanikolaou A, Mourkoyannis D. Hull-form
optimization of high speed vessels with respect to wash and powering.
Eighth International Marine Design Conference (IMDC 2003),
Athens, Greece; 2003.
K.A. Belibassakis / Applied Ocean Research 25 (2003) 321–336336