a dynamic magnetic equivalent circuit model for the design
TRANSCRIPT
A Dynamic Magnetic Equivalent Circuit
Model for the Design of Wound Rotor
Synchronous Machines
Research of Xiaoqi (Ron) Wang
Advisor: Steve Pekarek
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Purdue University
WRSM/Rectifier Design
2
WRSM/active rectifier
+
_
vdcWRSM
ias
ibs
ics
Ifd
WRSM/passive rectifier
rc rt st bs ss rt rt
T
rp s s fd fd p
design d l d g d d fw fh fw
fw N N I P ftipw ftipI h
rc rt st bs ss rt rt
T
rp s fd f dt num ond p c
design d l d g d d fw fh fw
fw N N I P ftip r d dw ftiph
cos( )as s rI I " "( , , )qdc dfdV f I L L
• A steady-state mesh-based MEC model for WRSMs
3
MEC Model for Active Rectification
Performance Calculation
• Electromagnetic torque
• Power loss
4
22
agj agj
e r
1 agj r
,2
na
j
PPT
P
loss res core condP P P P
2
2 2
0
3
2res fd fd s as r rP r I r i d
2
1 max
2
0
T
eld h eq
b b
Eddy Current LossHysteresis Loss
B k f dBP B k f f dt
B B dt
, ,core ld T ST ld Y SYP P V P V
2
0
13
2cond drop as r rP V i d
Resistive loss:
Core loss:
where
Conduction loss:
Total loss:
2
2 20max min
2T
eq
dBf dt
dtB B
and
Dynamic MEC Network
for Passive Rectification
5
d-axis
db
dst
q-axis
as-axis
θrm
drp
drc
rsh
wrt
wrp
hrtt
wstt
g
rds
rdt
l - axial length
of machine
rro
hrtb
rsi r
so
hrto
wss
wst
RY
RTT
RTL
RSH
ics'
Φst1
ics'
Φst2
ics'
Φst3
ias
Φst4
ias
Φst5
ias
Φst6
ibs
'
Φst7
ibs
'
Φst8
ibs
'
Φst9
X X X
RRLO1
RRTI1
Rag
idp1 i
dp2idp3
RRSH1
RRSH2
RRYP
ifd' i
fdX
RFL
RRY
RRFB
RRFB
RRF
RRPL
Φag1
Φag2
Φag4
Φag6
Φag8
Φag10
Φag12
Φag15
Φag17
Φag20
Φrt1 Φ
rt2
λdp,1
λdp,2
λdp,3
RRTO1
*
RRTE
RRLO2 R
RLI1R
RLO3R
RLO4
RRTO2
* RRTO3
* RRTO4
*
RRTE
RRTI2 R
RTEΦ
rp1
RRFB
Φrp2
Φrp3
Φrp4
Φrp5
Rotor Pole Flux Tubes
6
2 2 2 2
11
1
11
1 1
2
2
2tan ( )
24 4
RTO dtRTO
RTO
RTO dt
RTO dt RTO dt
l rR
lh l
h r
l h r h r
RRTE1
RRTO1
RRTI1
RRTE2
RRTO2 R
RTO3 RRTO4
RRTI2
fwrto
(x)
-x x
hrtm
lRTE1
lRTO2
lRTO1
RRTO1_1
RRTO1_2
RRTO1_3
hR
TO
1
RRSH1
RRSH2
lRTI1
Rotor Pole Tip Leakage Flux Tubes
7
Main path
Leakage path
lRTO1
hR
TO
1
r dt
RRTO1
*
ddp
l - axial length
of machine
P1
P2
P3
Stator tooth
g
RRLO1
12
3
1
0
1
2
0
*
1 1 1
( 2 )
1ln( )
8 2
2 ( ) ln( )
2
1 1 1
dp dp RTO dt
dp dt
RLO dt
PP
dp dt dp dt
dp dt
P
RTO RTO RLO
d h r
d rl l
R r
g d r g g d rl
d r
R R R
P1: leakage inside the bar.
P2: leakage in the steel.
P3: leakage in the airgap.
Damper Bar Placement
• Odd number damper bars: one of the bars is located in the center of the
most inner two RRTI sections.
• Even number damper bars: there is no hole in the center of the most
inner two RRTIi sections, but they are symmetrically distributed on the
two sides of the rest of the rotor pole sections.
• Arbitrary number and radius of damper bars can be applied:
• Arbitrary vertical depth of the damper bars can be assigned by
adjusting the scaling factor αdp.
8
3 2 1 2 3[... ...]dt dt dt dt dtr r r r rdamper_rtip
Steady-State KVL MEC Model
9
System equation: ( ) ( 1) ( 1)
R l l=nl nl nl nl A φ F
where l st1 st rt1 rt ag1 ag rp1 rp
T
ns nr na np φ
and T T T T T
( 1) ( 1) ( 1) ( 1)
l st rt rp= ns nr na np
F F F 0 F
Damper winding MMF source: ( 1) ( ) ( 1)
rp dp dp( )= ( , ) ( )np np nd ndj j k k F N i
where ( )
dp , 1np nd j k N , if the kth damper winding current is in the jth rotor pole loop.
( )
dp , 0np nd j k N , otherwise.
Stator and rotor MMF source: T( 1) ( 3) (3 1) ( 1) ( 1)
st abc abcs rt rt fd fd fd, 1 1 0ns ns nr nr I N I F N i F N
In this case,
(5 1) (3 1)
rp dp
1 0 00 0 0
= 0 1 00 0 00 0 1
F i
Dynamic System Structure
10
MEC System of Equations
R l l l( ) = =A φ φ F Ni
i lφPost-processing
T
abcs abc st=λ N φP
abcs = ( , )v f i λ
KVL MEC Model
MEC System of Equations External Circuit Model
(e.g. Passive Rectifier)
= ( )v f i
( )i k
Numerical Integration
= ( , )λ f v ip
( 1)= ( , ( ))λ g λ λk p k
( )λ k
( )i k
( )v k
Dynamic MEC Model
OR: user-input ( )v k
R 1 l fd
2
I=
A W φB
W 0 i λ
Restructuring the MEC Model
11
1) Expand the KVL MEC system: R l l,abc abcs l,dp dp l,fd fd- - = IA φ N i N i N
2) Relate the flux and flux linkage:
( 1) ( ) ( 1) ( ( ) ( ) ( 1)
abcs l,abc st dp l,dp l l,dp_sub l= , =nd nd nl nl nd nl nd nd nd nlP λ N φ λ M φ 0 M φ
In this case,
l,dp_sub
,1 1
,2 3
,3 5
1 1 00 1 11 0 1
dp rp
dp rp
dp rp
M
3) Dynamic MEC system of equations:
R l,abc l,dpfdl l,fdT
l,abcabcs abcs
dp dpl,dp
- - I0 0
= 0 / 00 0 0
P
A N N φ NN i I λ
Ii λM
Dynamic System with Scaling
12
Apply qd transformation:
dyn
-1
R l,abc s l,dp fdl l,fdT
s l,abc qd0s,scl qd0s
dp,scl dpl,dp
- - I0 0
= 0 / 00 0 0
scale scale
scale scale
scalescale
f f
f f Pf
f
A
A N K N φ N
K N i I λIi λM
where 3
qd0s qd0s,scl dp dp,scl scale= , = , 10scale scalef f f i i i i
Compare to the structure block diagram,
1
1 scale l,abc s l,dpscalef f
W N K N
T
s l,abc2
l,dp
scale
scale
f
f
K NW
M
l,fd 0 0
0 / 00 0
scale
scale
f Pf
N
B II
State Equations of Damper Bars
13
λdp,1
re,1
re,2
re,3
re,3
re,1 r
e,2re,3
re,3
rdp,1 i
dp,2rdp,2 i
dp,3rdp,3
ie
λdp,2
λdp,3Xλ
dp,3
idp,1
3
e dp,k
k=1
1i i
2
From Ohm’s and Faraday’s laws,
dp dp dp=pλ T i
where ,1 ,1 ,2 ,1 ,1
dp ,2 ,2 ,2 ,3 ,2
,1 ,3 ,3 ,3 ,3
dp e dp e e
e dp e dp e
dp e e dp e
r r r r r
r r r r r
r r r r r
T
State Equations of Stator Windings
14
Rearrange the voltage equation:
qd0s qd0s qd0s qd0s
0 1 0= - - -1 0 0
0 0 0sp r
λ v i λ
Calculation of resistive loss:
22 2
0
22 2
, , , ,0
1
3
2
2
res s as r r fd fd
stator field
nd
dp k dp k r e k e k r r
k
damper
P r i d r i
Pr i r i d
Hardware Validation
15
C
Open Circuit Voltage
16 MEC Hardware
Field currents:0-10.2 A
Rotor speed: 1800 rpm
Maximum error: 5%
Balanced 3-Phase Load Test
17
Conditions:
- Rotor speed: 1800 rpm
- RMS line-line voltage: 480 V
- Power factor: 0.8 lagging
(parallel RL load)
- Pmech = 303 W
- rbrush = 1 Ω
- Loss of exciter is not modeled
Average input torque:
_e rm mech core
in avg
rm
T P PT
Output power:
out e rm resP T P
Load
RMS values of
Phase current (A)
Average input
torque (Nm)
Output power
(kW)
MEC Test MEC Test MEC Test
1 4.8 4.5 21.01 19.98 3.1775 2.9858
2 8.0 7.6 33.81 32.26 5.3641 5.0707
3 12.0 11.4 49.95 47.78 7.9783 7.5915
4 15.9 15.2 66.11 64.16 10.4445 10.1030
Load
MEC Test
Ps+f
(W)
Pcore
(W)
Pdp
(W)
Pcore+dp
(W)
Ps+f
(W)
Pcore+dp
(W)
1 235.5 232.3 12.5 244.7 229.5 247.9
2 431.2 241.8 32.9 274.7 414.5 292.8
3 793.2 254.2 86.4 340.6 757.6 354.4
4 1267.4 265.3 181.9 447.2 1211.2 477.0
Voltage Waveforms
18
The error of RMS values is approximately 5%.
Standstill Frequency Response
19
Low-frequency asymptote: magnetizing impedances.
High-frequency asymptote: subtransient impedances.
-At low frequencies (< 0.4 Hz)
Match closely.
-At mid frequencies (> 0.4 Hz, <20 Hz)
Additional conduction path that exists
between the copper plates and the rotor
shaft.
-At higher frequencies (> 100 Hz)
Error between MEC and FEA comes
from the modeling of rotor pole tip
leakage flux path.
Lower test-q due to eddy currents.
Different Depth of Damper Bars
20
αdp=0.5 αdp=0.0001
Influence of the Leakage Path Between Poles
21
25 MW WRSM/Rectifier Design
22
WRSM/active rectifier
+
_
vdcWRSM
ias
ibs
ics
Ifd
WRSM/passive rectifier
rc rt st bs ss rt rt
T
rp s s fd fd p
d l d g d d fw fh fw
fw N I N I P ftipw ftiph
θ rc rt st bs ss rt rt
T
rp s fd fd p dt num con
d l d g d d fw fh fw
fw N N I P ftipw ftiph r d d
θ
Pareto Front
23
Genes Distribution
24
WRSM/active rectifier: larger height of rotor teeth (HRT), airgap length (G), and pole pair (Pp).
WRSM/passive rectifier: larger stack length (GLS), stator turns (Ns) and field turns (Nfld).
Example Machines
25
WRSM/active rectifier WRSM/passive rectifier
Conclusions
• Developed a voltage-input dynamic MEC model that
includes damper bar currents dynamics.
– Enables exploration of alternative damper configurations
– Enables multi-objective design of machine/passive rectifiers
– Readily extended to multi-phase machines
• Initial study utilized to compare Passive/Active designs
– Surprising result is that the machine for the passive designs are less
massive for a given specified loss
26