a eukaryotic transcriptional activator bearing the dna specificity of a prokaryotic repressor
DESCRIPTION
A Eukaryotic Transcriptional Activator Bearing the DNA Specificity of a Prokaryotic Repressor. By Roger Brent and Mark Ptashne Cell (1985) 43:729-736 Presented by N. Kuldell and R. Weiss for 20.382 02.10.10. Principles of gene regulation. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
A Eukaryotic Transcriptional Activator Bearing the DNA Specificity of a Prokaryotic Repressor
By Roger Brent and Mark PtashneCell (1985) 43:729-736
Presented by N. Kuldell and R. Weiss for 20.38202.10.10
Principles of gene regulation
Hypothesize: Tx’n is regulated with modular components
Hypothesize: Eukaryotic and prokaryotic systems share common themes for control– Binding– Protein-protein contact to activate– Cooperativity– Modularity
Why we care: enable synthetic control systems
Prokaryotic Transcriptional Regulation
Activation
cI contacts RNAP
figure from The Genetic Switch
Repression
Lac repressor blocks RNAP
figure from Freeman online text
http://bcs.whfreeman.com/thelifewire/content/chp13/1302001.html
Thumbnail sketch about LexA repressor in E. coli
DNA repair gene
SOS response pathway
UV damage
DNA repair gene
Thumbnail sketch about GAL regulation in yeast, circa 1985
Modular functions enable synthetic control of transcription
Domain swap experiment
bacterial protein
Brent and Ptashne Cell (1985) 43:729-736
yeast gene
TXN?no
Modular functions enable synthetic control of transcription
Domain swap experiment
bacterial protein
Brent and Ptashne Cell (1985) 43:729-736
yeast gene
TXN?no
yes
Yeast activation domain
Bacterial binding domain
“what if”…eukaryotic activators work like cI
You’re crazy….•What about nuclear localization signals?•What about histones?
Brent Nature (1984) 312:612
“what if”…eukaryotic activators work like cI
You’re crazy….•What about nuclear localization signals?•What about histones?
Brent Nature (1984) 312:612
So knew that bacterial protein could function in eukaryotic nucleus…
“what if”…eukaryotic activators work like cI
You’re crazy….•What about nuclear localization signals?•What about histones?•What if it just works differently?
Brent Cell (2004) S116:S73
“what if”…eukaryotic activators work like cI
You’re crazy….•What about nuclear localization signals?•What about histones?•What if it just works differently?•What about distance between binding site for activator and promoter?
LexA-GAL4 fusion protein construct
Brent and Ptashne Cell (1985) 43:729-736
LexA-GAL4 works in E. coli
Brent and Ptashne Cell (1985) 43:729-736
LexA-GAL4 activates transcription in yeast
LexA-GAL4 activates transcription in yeast
Mapping 5’ end of transcript to verify
Brent and Ptashne Cell (1985) 43:729-736
Squelching by overexpression of GAL4
Brent and Ptashne Cell (1985) 43:729-736
Downstream Activation as well!
Brent and Ptashne Cell (1985) 43:729-736
Figure 5
CritiqueKey assumptions
•protein functions are modular•eukaryotic/prokaryotic/whatever….
Biggest gaps
•footprinting of protein on DNA? •RNAP contact?•nucleosome remodeling? •generalizable?
Significance and Meta-lessons•Protein “parts” can be moved from natural context and intelligently designed to regulate transcription
•Activation via binding and contact with RNAP
“yeast two hybrid”
“bacterial two hybrid”