a framework to move from common core to classroom practice lexington, kentucky revisiting ldc april...

62
A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Upload: jeremy-goodman

Post on 16-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

A framework to move from common core to classroom practice

Lexington, KentuckyRevisiting LDCApril 18, 2014

1

Page 2: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Overview of the Sessions

2

Page 3: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Outcomes• Develop a deeper understanding writing LDC

modules• Gain a deeper understanding of the role of text

complexity• Share high-leverage instructional strategies• Calibrate expectations when scoring and analyzing

student work• Explore Socratic Seminar as an effective strategy for

synthesizing information

3

Page 4: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Norms

• What working agreements will help make today be successful for you?

4

Page 5: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Guiding Questions• How is LDC a strategy for

implementing the common core? • How does our conversation benefit

the students we service?• How does our conversation impact

instruction in our classrooms?

5

Page 6: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

`How is LDC a strategy for implementing the common core? After reading informational texts, participating in discussions, and engaging with multimedia, write notes, to be used in a Socratic Seminar, that explain the impact of this strategy on students. What conclusions or implications can you draw? Cite at least 3 sources, pointing out key elements from each source. (Task 19: Informational/Synthesis)

6

Page 7: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

A Look at LDC in the Classroom A Look at LDC in the Classroom

Literacy Matters http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5EnOVjRPGI

What do you notice that the

teacher is saying and doing?

What do you notice that the students are

saying and doing?

7

Page 8: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Instructional Shifts Required by the Common Core

Increasing rigor and relevance

Sharing responsibility of teaching reading and writing across content areas

Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction and informational text

Reading, writing, speaking and listening grounded in evidence from texts

Practicing regularly with complex text and its academic vocabulary

Emphasizing 3 modes of academic writing 8

Page 9: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

JigsawHow does LDC support the implementation of the instructional shifts and expectations demanded by the Common Core State Standards?

9

Page 10: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Instructional Shifts Required by the Common Core

Increasing rigor and relevance

Reading, writing, speaking and listening grounded in evidence from texts

Sharing responsibility of teaching reading and writing across content areas

Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction and informational text

Practicing regularly with complex text and its academic vocabulary

Emphasizing 3 modes of academic writing 10

Page 11: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Overview of the LDC Framework

11

Page 12: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Introduce Collection 2Task 2 Template (Argumentation/Analysis): [Insert optional question] After reading ________ (literature or

informational texts), write a/an ________ (essay or substitute) in which you address the question and argue_______(content) Support your position with evidence from the text(s).

Task 14 Template: (Informational/Description): [Insert optional question] After reading ________ (literature or informational texts), write a/an ________ (essay, report, or substitute) in which you describe ________ (content). Support your discussion with evidence from the text(s). 12

Page 13: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Demands

• Demands are additional writing and cognitive challenges that you can add to a template task.

• Demands are developed from language in the CCSS.

• Demands can scaffold your instruction.

13

Page 14: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

DemandsYou may choose one or more of these demands (D) to increase the challenge:•D1 Be sure to acknowledge competing views. •D2 Give ____(one; #) example/s from past or current ____ (events; issues) to illustrate and clarify your position. •D3 What _____(conclusions; implications) can you draw ____? •D4 In your discussion, address the credibility and origin of sources in view of your research topic. •D5 Identify any gaps or unanswered questions. •D6 Use ________ (stylistic devices) to develop your work. •D7 Use ________ (techniques) to convey multiple storylines. •D8 Include ________ (e.g. bibliography, citations, references, endnotes). 14

Page 15: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Task 21: [Insert optional question] After reading ________ (literature or informational texts), write a/an ________ (report, essay or substitutes) in which you analyze ________ (content), providing examples to clarify your analysis. (Informational or Explanatory/Analysis)

Task 21 (Informational or Explanatory/Analysis): What is the theme of the poem Mother to Son? After reading Mother to Son and an informational text on metaphors, write an essay for our class literary magazine in which you analyze how Langston Hughes’ use of metaphors contributes to an understanding of the theme of this poem, providing examples to clarify your analysis. Include a bibliography.

LDC Template Task Teaching TaskTeachers fill–in-the-blank by choosing:

text - writing product - content - text structure

15

Page 16: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Strong Teaching Tasks:•Are worthy of 2, 3 or 4 weeks of instruction•Ask students to grapple with important content to the discipline•Provide opportunities to read informational text of appropriate text complexity and content specific to the grade level •Have students working in the most effective mode of discourse/text structure •Evolve from a rigorous text-dependent question directly related to the content being taught•Involve products written for an authentic audiences Important Note:Engage students in completing a balanced set of writing tasks over the course of the year

16

Page 17: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Discipline SpecificGrade 7 ELATask Template 2 — Argumentation & Analysis

When, if ever, is it morally responsible to disobey authority? After reading primary and secondary document sources write a speech to the mayor and local officials that addresses the question and support your position with evidence from the texts.

RI7.8Which author articulates the most convincing claim as to when it is morally responsible to disobey authority? After reading primary and secondary document sources, write an essay to display at our upcoming literary sharing session that addresses the question and support your position with evidence from the texts.

17

Page 18: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Strong Teaching Tasks:•Are worthy of 2, 3 or 4 weeks of instruction•Ask students to grapple with important content to the discipline•Provide opportunities to read informational text of appropriate text complexity and content specific to the grade level •Have students working in the most effective mode of discourse/text structure •Evolve from a rigorous text-dependent question directly related to the content being taught•Involve products written for an authentic audiences Important Note:Engage students in completing a balanced set of writing tasks over the course of the year

18

Page 19: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Jurying Teaching Tasks

19

Page 20: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Write a Task• Choose a topic and/or texts• Identify the targeted standard(s) and GLEs• Decide what you want students to learn• Determine mode of writing

• Informational or Argumentation• Determine text structure

• Choose a template task• Write the proposed teaching task• Decide which demands you will include

20

Page 21: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Checklist for Teaching Tasks

Checklist for Teaching Tasks

What content/discipline specific standards are being addressed by this teaching task?

Guiding Questions yes no

Were the words of the template task used exactly as stated?

Does the teaching task address a standard within the discipline?

Does the teaching task build students’ content knowledge important to the discipline?

Does the teaching task have a clear purpose and focus?

Is the teaching task rigorous?

Is the teaching task worthy of the intended instructional time?

Is the teaching task text-dependent?

Is the teaching task written in a bias-free manner?

Does the teaching task build higher order thinking skills?

Is the written product rigorous and authentic?

Does the teaching task require grade level specific writing expectations?

Does the teaching task engage students in applying CCSS writing skills to produce writing in a genre that is appropriate for the task content?

Does the teaching task reflect the appropriate mode of writing? (Please note: If choosing argumentative, be sure there is more than one side that can be argued with text-based evidence.)

21

Page 22: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Jury Draft Teaching Tasks

• Offer one compliment• Pose one question

22

Page 23: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Jurying ModulesHow are modules deemed ‘exemplar’?How can we support this process?

23

Page 24: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Jurying a Module

-Section 1: What Task-Section 2: What Skills-Section 3: What Instruction

5 Most Effective Components 24

Investment Research

Retelling Corduroy

Page 25: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

•The text selection is critical!•Look for the perfect balance:

-reading level of students-complexity of text (demands on skills and stamina of reader)-background knowledge required for comprehension-sufficiency of content for writing task

•Keep Gradual Release in mind:-whole group-small group-independent

•Be sure text provides students with information needed to respond completely to the teaching task.•If an argumentation task, be sure the quantity and content of texts arent biased.

Choosing the Texts (and if desired, multi-media)

25

Page 26: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Text Complexity

• Quantitative Measures

• Qualitative Characteristics

• Considerations of Readers and Task26

Page 27: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Quantitative Dimensions

…refer to those aspects of text complexity, such as word

length or frequency, sentence length, and text cohesion,

that are difficult … for a human reader to evaluate

efficiently… and are thus today typically measured by

computer software

27

Page 28: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Qualitative Characteristics

…refer to those aspects of text complexity best measured

or only measurable by an attentive human reader, such as

levels of meaning or purpose; structure; language

conventionality and clarity; and knowledge demands.

- Levels of Meaning (literary texts) or Purpose (informational texts)- Structure- Language Conventionality and Clarity- Knowledge Demands: Life Experiences (literary texts)- Knowledge Demands: Cultural/Literary Knowledge (literary texts)- Knowledge Demands: Content/Discipline Knowledge (informational texts)

28

Page 29: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Qualitative Features of Text

29

Page 30: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Matching Reader and Task…variables specific to particular readers (such as motivation,

knowledge, and experiences) and to particular tasks (such as

purpose and the complexity of the task assigned and the

questions posed) must also be considered… Such assessments

are best made by teachers employing their professional

judgment, experience, and knowledge of their students and

the subject.

30

Page 31: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Text Complexity• Read page one of The Book Thief excerpt

• Lexile Level = 730L • 2nd-3rd Grade Recommended Lexile Levels = 420-820• 4th-5th Grade Recommended Lexile Levels = 740-1010

• What are the qualitative features noted?

31

Page 32: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Example - The Book Thief

32

Page 33: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

33

Quantitative Analysis730 Lexile

Qualitative AnalysisText Structure - ComplexLanguage Features – Complex Meaning - ComplexKnowledge Demands – Somewhat Complex

The Book Thief

• The Book Thief would probably be most appropriate in middle school.

• Specifically 7th-8th grade• Less mature readers could definitely

read and understand pieces of, but a more sophisticated read does it more justice. 

Page 34: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Collegial Sharing of Best PracticesGive One – Get One

Quick Write – Instructional Strategy for:Preparing for the TaskDeveloping VocabularyActive Reading and Note-TakingBridging Conversation from Reading to WritingWriting, Planning and DevelopmentRevision and Editing

Alignment between all components is critical!Creates an opportunity for a formative cycle! 34

Page 35: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

High Leverage Instructional Strategies

• Deconstructing the Teaching Task• Translating the Rubric

35

Page 36: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Skill Cluster 1: Preparing for the Task

Recommended Strategy: Deconstruct the Teaching TaskWhat are the features of an ideal mixed

economy? After reading informational texts, editorials, and an interactive infographic write an essay for the school newspaper that compares the characteristics of market and command economies and argues what combination of characteristics would be most effective for the United States today. Be sure to support your position with evidence from the texts.

36

Page 37: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Skill Cluster 1: Preparing for the TaskRecommended Strategy: Translate the Rubric

Rubric Translation

L1: What are the features of an ideal mixed economy? After reading informational texts, editorials, and an interactive infographic write an essay for the school newspaper that compares the characteristics of market and command economies and argues what combination of characteristics would be most effective for the United States today. Be sure to support your position with evidence from the texts.

Focus

Controlling Idea

Reading – Research

Development

Organization

Conventions

Content Understanding

What are the features of an ideal mixed economy? After reading informational texts, editorials, and an interactive infographic write an essay for the school newspaper that compares the characteristics of market and command economies and argues what combination of characteristics would be most effective for the United States today. Be sure to support your position with evidence from the texts.

37

Page 38: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Rubric Elements within the Context of the Teaching Task

• Focus – Addresses key aspects of prompt in a detailed response; stays on task

My essay will stay on the topic of a mixed economy. I will compare the characteristics of market and command economies. I will make a claim about which combination of these characteristics would be most beneficial in the US today.

38

Page 39: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

What Results? What Results? – Section 4

Scoring Student Work with the LDC Rubric

• Can be used to score holistically or analytically

• 2 rubrics – Informative/explanatory & Argumentative

• 7 Scoring Elements:

• Focus• Controlling Idea• Reading/Research• Development• Organization• Conventions• Content Understanding 39

Page 40: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

LDC Rubrics – Scoring v. Grading

The LDC rubric…•provides feedback to students and teachers•helps students know expectations prior to completing the task•helps teachers gauge the effectiveness of their instructional choices

Scoring Rubric for Argumentation Template Tasks

Scoring Elements

Not Yet Approaches Expectations Meets Expectations Advanced

1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Focus Attempts to address prompt, but

lacks focus or is off-task.

Addresses prompt appropriately and establishes a position, but

focus is uneven.

Addresses prompt appropriately and maintains a clear, steady focus. Provides a generally convincing

position.

Addresses all aspects of prompt

appropriately with a consistently strong focus and convincing position.

Controlling Idea

Attempts to establish a claim, but lacks a clear purpose. (L2)

Makes no mention of counter claims.

Establishes a claim. (L2) Makes

note of counter claims.

Establishes a credible claim. (L2) Develops claim and counter claims

fairly.

Establishes and maintains a substantive and credible claim or proposal. (L2)

Develops claims and counter claims fairly and thoroughly.

Reading/ Research

Attempts to reference reading materials to develop response,

but lacks connections or relevance to the purpose of the

prompt.

Presents information from reading materials relevant to the purpose of the prompt with minor

lapses in accuracy or completeness.

Accurately presents details from reading materials relevant to the purpose of the prompt to develop

argument or claim.

Accurately and effectively presents

important details from reading materials to develop argument or claim.

Development

Attempts to provide details in response to the prompt, but lacks

sufficient development or relevance to the purpose of the

prompt. (L3) Makes no connections or a connection that is irrelevant to argument or claim.

Presents appropriate details to support and develop the focus, controlling idea, or claim, with minor lapses in the reasoning,

examples, or explanations. (L3) Makes a connection with a weak

or unclear relationship to argument or claim.

Presents appropriate and sufficient details to support and develop the

focus, controlling idea, or claim. (L3) Makes a relevant connection to clarify

argument or claim.

Presents thorough and detailed information to effectively support and develop the focus, controlling idea, or

claim. (L3) Makes a clarifying connection(s) that illuminates argument

and adds depth to reasoning.

Organization Attempts to organize ideas, but

lacks control of structure.

Uses an appropriate organizational structure for

development of reasoning and logic, with minor lapses in

structure and/or coherence.

Maintains an appropriate organizational structure to address specific

requirements of the prompt. Structure reveals the reasoning and logic of the

argument.

Maintains an organizational structure that intentionally and effectively enhances the presentation of information as required by the specific prompt. Structure enhances

development of the reasoning and logic of the argument.

Conventions

Attempts to demonstrate standard English conventions,

but lacks cohesion and control of grammar, usage, and mechanics.

Sources are used without citation.

Demonstrates an uneven command of standard English

conventions and cohesion. Uses language and tone with

some inaccurate, inappropriate, or uneven features. Inconsistently

cites sources.

Demonstrates a command of standard English conventions and cohesion, with

few errors. Response includes language and tone appropriate to the

audience, purpose, and specific requirements of the prompt. Cites

sources using appropriate format with only minor errors.

Demonstrates and maintains a well-developed command of standard English

conventions and cohesion, with few errors. Response includes language and tone

consistently appropriate to the audience, purpose, and specific requirements of the prompt. Consistently cites sources using

appropriate format.

Content Understanding

Attempts to include disciplinary content in argument, but

understanding of content is weak; content is irrelevant,

inappropriate, or inaccurate.

Briefly notes disciplinary content relevant to the prompt; shows

basic or uneven understanding of content; minor errors in

explanation.

Accurately presents disciplinary content relevant to the prompt with sufficient

explanations that demonstrate understanding.

Integrates relevant and accurate disciplinary content with thorough

explanations that demonstrate in-depth understanding.

40

Page 41: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Common Misconceptions about Scoring with the LDC

Rubric• Confusion between Focus and Controlling Idea• Grading only the final product• Using a straight percentage score for a grade

41

Page 42: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Collaborative Scoring

42

Page 43: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

LDC

Is Not• a program• a set of materials

Is• an instructional strategy• a framework

43

Page 44: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

How does LDC look and sound?

• Teaching Task - highlighted daily• Gradual Release of Responsibility• Students empowered and held accountable as learners • Instruction and facilitation• High level of engagement• Daily oral and written discourse• Active reading• Academic writing • Formative Assessment • Academic Behaviors• Goal setting and reflection by students

44

Page 45: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

What is special about the LDC strategy?

45

Page 46: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Skill Cluster 3: Transition to WritingPossible Strategy: Socratic Seminarhttps://www.teachingchannel.org/videos/teaching-the-n-word

46

Page 47: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Socratic Seminar: Expectations• We read and think about the text in advance.• We refer to the text and give enough time for fellow

classmates to locate text.• We engage in conversation; we don’t talk at each

other.• We show we are listening by tracking the speaker

and summarizing what a classmate said.• We don’t raise our hand, but we wait for speaker to

finish.• We ask questions, give comments, but always give

evidence to support our opinions.47

Page 48: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Follow-Up Questions• Tell me more about that.• What about the reading made you think that ___?• Using evidence, convince us that __.• In what other context does that idea play out?• What evidence would you give to someone who thought ___?• Based on what we have read, what do you think that we will

discover in the next chapter?• After reading this information, how would handle a situation

like ___?• How is your answer different or the same from others?• So, this leads to you to what conclusions?• What did you discover?

Adapted from http://www.edutopia.org/blog/rethinking-whole-class-discussion-todd-finley 48

Page 49: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Socratic Seminar• It’s OKAY to disagree, so long as you do so

respectfully• I understand what you are saying, but I

disagree because…• I respect your opinion, but I disagree because…• I hear where you are coming from, but…

• Most importantly, in a discussion there are no right or wrong answers.

49

Page 50: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Sentence Starters• So what you’re saying is…• I disagree/agree…• I’d like to raise a question…• I’m confused about…• What is your opinion of…• I think this means…• What puzzles me is…• This relates to…• Do you agree/disagree….• Don’t you think this is similar to…• I’d like to talk with people about…

50

Page 51: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Readying for a Socratic Seminar

Annotating text: How is LDC a strategy for implementing the common core?

RI-1: Ask yourself - and make notes (underline, circle, record important information in the margins) - about what the text says explicitly and what inferences you can logically make from the text. Record specific textual evidence that addresses the teaching task/guiding questions.

51

Page 52: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

`How is LDC a strategy for implementing the common core? After reading informational texts, participating in discussions, and engaging with multimedia, write notes, to be used in a Socratic Seminar, that explain the impact of this strategy on students. What conclusions or implications can you draw? Cite at least 3 sources, pointing out key elements from each source. (Task 19: Informational/Synthesis)

52

Page 53: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

We Have Been Discussing…• How is LDC a strategy for

implementing the common core? • How does our conversation benefit

the students we service?• How does our conversation impact

instruction in our classrooms?

53

Page 54: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Socratic SeminarIf your principal had no prior LDC training, can you justify spending 20 instructional days on an LDC module?

54

Page 55: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Readying for a Socratic Seminar

Reviewing notesReviewing rolesSetting a goal

55

Page 56: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Sentence Starters• So what you’re saying is…” • I disagree/agree…• I’d like to raise a question:• I’m confused about• What is your opinion of…• I think this means…• What puzzles me is…• This relates to…• Do you agree/disagree….• Don’t you think this is similar to…• I’d like to talk with people about…

56

Page 57: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

SupportsWhat are expectations?What assistance is available?

57

Page 58: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Supportswww.reachassoc.net

58

Page 59: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

LDC Websitewww.ldc.org

59

Page 60: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Work Session

60

Page 61: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Questions and AnswersExit Slip

61

Page 62: A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Lexington, Kentucky Revisiting LDC April 18, 2014 1

Feel free to be in touch…

Diane - [email protected]

Jody – [email protected]

www.reachassoc.net

62