a funcional approach to treatment of skeletal
DESCRIPTION
A Funcional Approach to Treatment of SkeletalTRANSCRIPT
Afunctionalapproachtotreatment ofskeletalopenbite RolfFrllnkelandChristineFrlnkel Zwichau,GermanDemocraticRepublic Ingeneralorthopedicstherelationshipbetweenposturalbehaviorandskeletaldeformitieshaslongbeen recognized.Theprimarytherapeuticprobleminfunctionalorthopedicsistoovercomefunctionaldisorders.Inthis articletheapplicabilityofthisfunctionalconcepttoorofacialorthopedicsisdiscussedonthebasisofa longitudinalstudyofskeletalopenbite.Acomparisonofaseriesoflateralcephalogramsofthirtypatientswith skeletalopenbitewhoweretreatedwithfunctionalregulatorsdevelopedbyFrankelandthoseofeleven untreatedopenbitecasessuggeststhatsomedentofacialdeformitiesintheskeletalopenbitecasescanbe correctedtotheaveragenorms.Inaddition,asaresultofovercomingthepoorposturalpatternoftheorofacial musculatureandre-establishmentofacompetentlipseal,aconsiderablechangeinthesoft-tissueprofile occurred. Keywords:Skeletal open bite,Frankel method,dentofacial orthopedics, abnormal posture Skeletalopenbiteisproducedbya combi- nationofdentalandskeletalirregularities,thelatterof whichis themoredominant.Thefacialmorphologyof thisdysplasiaischaracterizedprimarilybystriking verticaldisproportionscausedbyabnormalratiosbe- tweenanteriorandposteriorfacialheights(AFH/PFH) andbetweenupperandloweranteriorfacialheights (UFH/LFH).Ashortramusandanincreasedgonial anglealso contributeto thehyperdivergentskeletalpat- tern.Asthereisnormalbiologicvariation,soeach dentofacialmalformationhasitsowncharacteristics anduniqueness.Therefore,thetypeofskeletalopen bitemustbedefinedbyvariousadditionalparameters. Theskeletalpatternofsuchaseveredysplasiaas skeletalopenbiteisdifficulttochangebymeansof conventionalorthodonticappliances.Someclinicians havewarnedagainstanyorthodontictreatmentand, instead,recommendcorrectivemeasuressuch as surgi- calandprostheticintervention.Itisnotsurprising, therefore,thatthehyperdivergentpatternofthisdys- plasiais assumedtobeprimarilytheexpressionofin- heritedverticalproportions.Thisviewis substantiated bytheresultsofHuntersinvestigationswhichsupport thehypothesisthatverticaldimensionsofthecraniofa- cialskeletonaremoregeneticallycontrolledthanare anteroposteriordimensions.However,asclaimedby Dullemeijer,allstructuresaregeneticallyanden- vironmentallyinfluenced.Inviewofthecharacterof ThisstudyispartofaninvestigationentltledFunctionalAspectsofSkeletal OpenBitesubmittedbyChristineFrlnkelinfulfillmentoftherequirements forthedoctoraldegreeattheUniversityofJena,GermanDemocraticRepublic. 54 biology,itisimpossibletostudyformwithoutalso studyingfunction,andviceversa.Thereisaspecific ordertothe influencesofeach structure.As theskeletal unitisthelastunittoexertitsinfluence,itsshapeis completelysubordinatetotheotherelementsortothe functionalmatricesinMossterminology.Poultonj holdsthattherecurrenceofsomeanterioropenbite problemsis theresultofmuscleimbalancecreatinga dentofacialproblem.Theteethandjawsmaybe broughtintoa positionofexcellentanatomicfunction, butifthemuscles whichworktogetherto close the jaws remainweakandflaccid,theopenbitemayreappear. Correctivetherapyinthesesituationsmustinclude worktobuildupthestrengthandfunctionoftheweak musclesiflong-termstabilityis tobeachieved. Thepurposeofthisarticleis totestthehypothesis thatafunctionalapproachwillprovidea betterunder- standingofhowlocalenvironmentalfactorscontribute tothedevelopmentofthehyperdivergentpatterninthe facialskeleton.Onthe basis ofourclinicalexperience, wewillattempttoshowthattheprinciplesofgeneral orthopedicscan be successfullyappliedto thetreatment ofskeletalopenbite.Webelievethatthistypeoftreat- mentallowsa moreoptimisticattitudetobetakento- wardthelong-termstabilityofskeletalopenbitecases treatedbydentofacialorthopedicsthanbyothertreat- mentmethods. DEVELOPMENTOFAFUNCTIONALSTRATEGY FORTREATMENTOFSKELETALOPENBITE Itwas EdwardAngle,4thefounderofmodemortho- dontics.whoemphasizedthemorphogeneticrelevance Volume84 NumberI Functionalapproachtotreatmentofskeletalopenbite55 ofthesoft-tissueenvironmenttothedentition.Angles beliefthatrelapseis causedbyforcesontheteethre- sultingfromanimpropersoft-tissueenvironmentap- peared to bea rationalconclusionfroma biomechanical pointofview.AfterWorldWarII,interestintherole ofthesofttissuesintheetiologyofmalocclusionin- creased enormously.Withregardto thedevelopmentof anopenbite,particularemphasiswasplacedonab- normalpatternsoftonguebehavior.Deviantpatternsof swallowingortonguethrustwereconsideredtobe a majorfactorinopeningthebite.Clinically,theadvo- catesofmyofunctionaltherapyrecommendedvari- ous kindsofexercises toovercometheabnormalbehav- iorpatternofthetongueincombinationwithspeech therapy.- Analternativetherapeuticapproachto thetreatment ofopenbiteatthattimewastheuseofapalatalcrib attachedtoeitherfixedorremovableappliances.In the1950sweusedsuchtongue-habitappliances, andtheywerequitesuccessfulina highpercentageof cases in whichan anterioropenbitehad persistedtothe ageof6 or7years.However,somepatientsexhibited relapseaftertreatment.Wethoughtthatthedurationof treatmentwithtongue-habitappliancesmighthave beentooshorttore-educatetonguebehaviorinthese cases.However,relapseoccurredevenafterrenewed treatmentwitha palatalcribappliance. Inanattempttofinda plausiblereasonforthere- lapseinthesepatients,weexaminedthemandfound thattheyallshoweda markeddiscrepancybetweenlip lengthandlowerfaceheight.Thisfindingcorre- spondedtoBallardssuggestionthat,inanevaluation ofhabitbehaviorsandtheirclinicalrelevance,more attentionshouldbe paidtothesize andshape ofthesoft tissues.Hestatedthateachcasemustbejudgedin relationtodisproportionsinthefacialskeletonand, fromhisclinicalobservations,concludedthattongue thrustas themajorcause ofopen bitehad beenoverem- phasized.Hearguedthatthefaultyinterdentalposture ofthetongueappearedtobeacompensatoryoradap- tivebehaviorwhichestablishedananteriororalseal whenthelipswereincapableofdoingso. Itwasduringthissame periodthatwewerework- ingonthedevelopmentofa functionalorthopedicap- proachusingskeletalvestibularshields.-Incontrast toastructuralconcept,webelievedthatlipincompe- tencewasnota consequenceofa discrepancybetween skeletalandsoft-tissuegrowth.Therefore,wehypoth- esizedthatthedeficiencyofanoralseal mightbe due, at leastin part,toa poorposturalbehaviorofthefacial musculature(particularlyintheliparea),evenincases ofskeletaldiscrepanciesassociatedwithasteepman- dibularplane.Thus,wedecidedtoinstitutefunctional therapywithvestibularshieldsandlip-sealtrainingfor anterioropen-biterelapsepatients.Afterarelatively shorttreatmenttime,weobservedthata normalover- bitewasestablishedand remainedstable,providedthat a competentanteriororalseal wasalsoestablished. Theclinicalexperiencegainedinthetreatmentof open-biterelapsepatientswasfundamentaltothe furtherdevelopmentoffunctionalorofacialorthope- dics.Theclinicalobservationthatanopenbitecan be closedwithoutusinganydevicewhichinterfereswith tonguemovementortongueposturesuggeststhat tonguethrustalonemaynotbetheprimarycauseof thatmalocclusionandthattheremaybeafunctional relationshipbetweentheposturalbehaviorofthe tongueandlips.Theimpactofposturalbehaviorpat- terns has beensubstantiatedby themorerecentworkof Proffitwhichdealswiththeorofacialmuscularenvi- ronmentanditsinfluenceonthemorphologyofthe dentition.Proffitsuggeststhatrapid-movementfunc- tions,suchasswallowing,chewing,andspeaking, havelittleimpactonthemorphologyofthedentition, whiletheimpactofposturalalterationsleadingto changesinlipandtonguerestingpressure andposture issignificant. Sincethelate1800sgeneralorthopedistshave learnedagreatdealabouttheform/functionrelation- shipinskeletalmorphogenesis.Inthelast50yearsan evolutionhasoccurredinthedevelopmentofafunc- tionalconcept.Clinicalevidenceaccumulatedduring thislongperiodsupportstheideathat,as faras func- tionalfactorsare concerned,aberrantposturalbehavior doesplayaprimaryroleintheetiologyofskeletal deformities.Biostatisticalstudiessuggestthatapoor posturalperformanceaffectingrelatedmusclesplaysa partinthedevelopmentofskeletalmalformations.la In generalorthopedics,therefore,functionaltherapyis commonplace,andtheprimarytherapeuticproblemin functionalorthopedicsis toovercomea faultypostural performancepattern.Thus,itseems logicaltoexamine whetheraberrantposturalbehavioroftheorofacial musclesplaysacausativeroleinthedevelopmentof dentofacialdeformities.Therefore,indevelopinga functionalapproachtoorofacialorthopedics,theortho- dontistshouldlooknotonlytohisowntrainingas a specialistofdentistrybuttothefieldofgeneralortho- pedicsas well.Forexample,incontrasttothetrunk andlimbs,thetwenty-twobonesoftheskullare almost exclusivelyofmembranousorigin.Theintermediate connectivetissues haveanadaptiveandcompensatory growthcapacitywhichishighlysusceptibletobio- mechanicalinfluencesandhencetofunctionalforces. Therefore,thereis reasontobelievethattreatmentde- signedtoovercomea poorposturalperformancewould beeffectiveintheorofacialcomplex. Therearecertainlydifficultiesindevelopinga TableI.Averagechangesbetweentheinitialandfinalcephalometricmeasurementsinthenontreatedgroup N(n=11) andthetreatedgroupT(n=30)anda comparisonofthedifferencesbyanalysisofvariance andbythepairedttestandFisher-Behrenstest 7 ,ziLgfor------- Angles(degrees)NTD$erencesFvalueIper&Signijicuncx~ 1.SN-MP+2.32-5.471.192.923.54** 2.SN-PP-0.36+2.302.662.095.24*** 3.PP-MP+2.68-1.4210.101.543.95*** 4.Go+0.23-6.376.601.355.54*** 5.z+2.68-5.128.403.707-.-4** 6.AFH-PFHquotient(Jarabak)-0.32+5.405.722.726.96*** 7.RatioUFH-LFH(Nahoum)-0.018+0.0530.071I.094.67*** Significance: **p