a gallery of dyadic concordance type ( dct) graphics murray a. straus
DESCRIPTION
A Gallery Of Dyadic Concordance Type ( DCT) Graphics Murray A. Straus Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire Durham, NH 03824 603-862-2594 [email protected] To download papers on DCTs, click http ://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/ CONTENTS - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
A Gallery Of Dyadic Concordance Type (DCT) GraphicsMurray A. Straus
Family Research Laboratory, University of New HampshireDurham, NH 03824 603-862-2594 [email protected]
To download papers on DCTs, click http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/CONTENTS
PART A. Percent Of Relationships In Each DCT 1. Physical Assault2. Injured Partner3. Sexually Coerced4. Psychological Aggression5. Other Maladaptive Behavior6. Concordance Between Parents In Child Socialization
PART B. Effects Of Being In each DCT1. Relation of Couple DCTs To Partner Problems2. Relation of Parent Behavior to Child Problems
PART APercent Of Relationships
In Each DCT
1. Physically Assaulted Partner
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
12
26
63
22 23
54
Male Respondents Female Respondents
%
Dyadic Concordance Types for Minor AssaultU.S. National Comorbidity Study (N=8,098)
3Kessler, R. C., Molnar, B. E., Feurer, I. D., & Appelbaum, M. (2001). Patterns and mental health predictors of domestic violence in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. International Journal Of Law And Psychiatry, 24(4-5), 487-508.
Prevalence Men 21%Women 23%
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2
54
44
23
20
57
Male Respondents Female Respondents
%
Dyadic Concordance Types for Severe AssaultU.S. National Comorbidity Study (N=8,098)
4Kessler, R. C., Molnar, B. E., Feurer, I. D., & Appelbaum, M. (2001). Patterns and mental health predictors of domestic violence in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. International Journal Of Law And Psychiatry, 24(4-5), 487-508.
Prevalence Men 6%Women 8%
5Straus, M. A., & Michel-Smith, Y. (2013). Mutuality, severity, and chronicity of violence by Father-Only, Mother-Only, and mutually violent parents as reported by university students in 15 nations. Child Abuse Negl. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.10.004
Couple Prevalence:14%
Note:Data for parents as reported by students
Violence Between Parents Of University Students In 15 Nations* 14% of parents had one or more violent incidents when student was 10* Among this 14%: ~ Predominant pattern was Both-Violent
~ Next was Father-Only, ~ Mother-Only almost as high
Father-Only Mother-Only Both-Assault0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2522
52
Same as slide 11
Dyadic Concordance for Any & Severe Assault, 1,157 University Student CouplesComparison CTS Short-Form and Full CTS2
6Straus, M. A. and E. M. Douglas (2004). "A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for seventy and mutuality." Violence and Victims 19: 507-520.
Male-only Female-only Both0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
9.4
28
63
8.9
20
72
Short Form Full Form
*Couple Prevalence according to:Short Form: 19%Full Form: 31%
ANY ASSAULT
Male-only Female-only Both0
10
20
30
40
50
60
16
34
51
15
37
46
Short Form Full Form
SEVERE ASSAULT*Couple Prevalence according to:
Short Form: 6%Full Form: 12%
2. Injured Partner
Male-Only
Female-Only
Both-In-jured
Male-Only
Female-Only
Both-In-jured
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
38
5
45
16
35
Chart Title
Any Injury Perpetrated Medical Treatment Needed
%
Dyadic Concordance In Injury180 Couples In Military Treatment Program For Domestic Violence
8Cantos, Arthur L., Neidig, Peter H., & O'Leary, K Daniel. (1994). Injuries of women and men in a treatment program for domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 9(2), 113-124.
Couple Injury Prevalence 65%
%
Dyadic Concordance Types for Injury As Reported By Men And WomenAge 24-33 (National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health N=4,795)
9
Couple Prevalence according to:
Males: 4%Females: 4%
Tillyer, M. S., & Wright, E. M. (2014). Intimate Partner Violence and the Victim-Offender Overlap. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(1), 29-55. doi: 10.1177/0022427813484315
Note: DTs are for the sub group of couples in which there was assault
Male-only Female-only Both0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
14
66
20
48
26 26
Male Respondents Female Respondents
Dyadic Concordance Types Type
%
Dyadic Concordance In Injury Among 481 University Student Couples
10Hines, D. A., & Saudino, K. J. (2003). Gender Differences in Psychological, Physical, and Sexual Aggression Among College Students using the revised Conflict Tactics Scales. Violence & Victims, 18(2), 197-217.
Couple Prevalence according to:
Males: 11%Females: 9%
Male-only Female-only Both0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
23
45
32
24
45
35
Male Respondents Female Respondents
Dyadic Concordance Types Type
3. Sexual Coercion
Male-Only
Female-Only
Both-Coerced
Male-Only
Female-Only
Both-Coerced
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
32
13
55
41
8
51Chart Title
Male Respondents Female Respondents
%
Dyadic Concordance In Past Year Sexual CoercionProbability sample of 3,496 adults Age 18-64 In Six European Cities
12
Costa, Diogo, Hatzidimitriadou, Eleni, Ioannidi-Kapolou, Elli, Lindert, Jutta, Soares, Joaquim, Sundin, Örjan, . . . Barros, Henrique. (2014). Intimate partner violence and health-related quality of life in European men and women: findings from the DOVE study. Quality of Life Research, 1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0766-9
Couple Prevalence According to: Men: 23%Women: 19%
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Co-
ertced
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Coerced
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
31
11
58
45
13
42
Chart Title
Male Respondents Female Respondents
%
Dyadic Concordance In Sexual Coercion As Reported By 2016 Spanish High School Students
13
Fernández-González, L., O’Leary, K. D., & Muñoz-Rivas, M. J. (2014). Age-Related Changes in Dating Aggression in Spanish High School Students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(6), 1132-1152. doi: 10.1177/0886260513506057 dy Of Social Problems annual meeting, New York 8 August 2013. .
Prevalence Men= 27%Women= 11%
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Coerced0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
42
13
46
%
Dyadic Concordance In Sexual Coercion Among 194 Beijing China Couples
14
Hou, J., Yu, L., Ting, S.-M., Sze, Y., & Fang, X. (2011). The Status and Characteristics of Couple Violence in China. Journal of Family Violence, 26(2), 81-92. doi: 10.1007/s10896-010-9343-3
Couple Prevalence: 24%
Dyadic Concordance Type
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
18 18
64
29
11
60Chart Title
Short Form Full Form
%
Dyadic Concordance In Any Sexual Coercion By 1,157 University Students Comparison of CTS Short-Form with Full CTS2
15
Prevalence Short: 13%Full: 20%
Straus, M. A. and E. M. Douglas (2004). "A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for seventy and mutuality." Violence and Victims 19: 507-520.
4. Psychological AggressionAgainst Partner
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Aaggressed0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2022
58
Chart Title
%
Dyadic Concordance In Psychological Aggression Among 194 Beijing China Couples
17Hou, J., Yu, L., Ting, S.-M., Sze, Y., & Fang, X. (2011). The Status and Characteristics of Couple Violence in China. Journal of Family Violence, 26(2), 81-92. doi: 10.1007/s10896-010-9343-3
Couple Prevalence: 55%
Dyadic Concordance Type
Mal
e-on
ly
Femal
e-on
lyBot
h0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1923
58
1922
59
80th Percentile
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
139
78
913
78
18
Straus, Murray A. (2014). Dyadic Concordance Types And Discordance In Three Partner Abuse Behaviors And Other Problematic Behavior By Male And Female Partners In A National Sample Of American Couples. Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire. Durham, NH. (For sample description, see Gelles, R., & Straus, M. A. (1988). Intimate violence: The causes and consequences of abuse in the American family. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.)
Couple Prevalence: 62%
Dyadic Concordance Types Of Frequent Psychological Aggression (50th & 80th Percentile) by 6,002 Couples in 2nd National Family Violence Survey
%
Dyadic Concordance Types Type
Couple Prevalence: 17%
50th Percentile
Male Female
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Aggresed0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
16
23
60Chart Title
%
Dyadic Concordance In Psychological Aggression By 202 Couples In First Year Of Marriage
19
Prevalence 36%
Prevalence and DTs used data provided by partner who reported a greater frequency of psychological aggression
Cut point for Psychological Aggression: 3 or more times in past year
Panuzio, J., & DiLillo, D. (2010). Physical, Psychological, and Sexual Intimate Partner Aggression Among Newlywed Couples: Longitudinal Prediction of Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Family Violence, 25(7), 689-699. doi: 10.1007/s10896-010-9328-2
5. Other Types Of Maladaptive Behavior
21
Straus, Murray A. (2014). Dyadic Concordance Types And Discordance In Three Partner Abuse Behaviors And Other Problematic Behavior By Male And Female Partners In A National Sample Of American Couples. Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire. Durham, NH. (For sample description, see Gelles, R., & Straus, M. A. (1988). Intimate violence: The causes and consequences of abuse in the American family. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.)
Male-onlyFemale-only Both0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
39
12
50
55
8
38
Dyadic Concordance Types For Drunkenness (Any & 3 +) in Past Year 6,002 Couples in the 2nd National Family Violence Survey
%
Dyadic Concordance Types Type
Male-only Female-only Both0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
50
17
33
72
6
22
3 + Drunkenness Couple Prevalence: 18%
Respondents Male FemaleAny Drunkenness
Couple Prevalence: 34%
%
Male-only Female-only Both0
10
20
30
40
50
60
46
20
34
52
17
31
Male Respondents Female Respondents
22Straus, Murray A. (2014). Dyadic Concordance Types And Discordance In Three Partner Abuse Behaviors And Other Problematic Behavior By Male And Female Partners In A National Sample Of American Couples. Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire. Durham, NH. (For sample description, see Gelles, R., & Straus, M. A. (1988). Intimate violence: The causes and consequences of abuse in the American family. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.)
Couple Prevalence:
13%
Dyadic Concordance Types For Non-Family Aggression6,002 Couples in the 2nd National Family Violence Survey
%
Dyadic Concordance Types
Father-Only Mother-Only Both 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
19 19
61Chart Title
%
Dyadic Concordance In Low Social ParticipationBy Parents Of 158 Children In 3rd Grade
23
Prevalence 62%
Mother-father r-=.63
Lows social Participation-Degree of participation of respondent in formal and informal social relationships. Example: About how many times in the past year have you attended meetings or affairs of any local organizations, societies or clubs? 0. 13+, 1. 7-12, 2. 4-6, 3. 1-3, 4. none.
Eron, L., et al. (1961). "Comparison of data obtained from mothers and fathers on childrearing practices and their relation to child aggression." Child Development 32: 457-472.
6. Concordance Between Parents In Child Socialization
Father-Only Mother-Only Both-Affectionate0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
7.9
18
74
Chart Title
%
Concordance Between Parents In Verbal Affection To Them As Recalled By 2,548 18-25 Year Old Individuals
25
Prevalence Affection by one or the other parent: 83%
Chart shows which parent did it.
Polcari, A., Rabi, K., Bolger, E., & Teicher, M. H. (2014). Parental verbal affection and verbal aggression in childhood differentially influence psychiatric symptoms and wellbeing in young adulthood. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38(1), 91-102. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.10.003
Father-Only
Mother-Only
Both Re-jected
Father-Only
Mother-Only
Both Re-jected
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
20
68
14
20
66Chart Title
Male Students Female Students
%
Dyadic Concordance In Rejection By Parents, At Or Above 60th Percentile As Reported By University Students In 15 Nations
26
Unpublished data from International Parenting Study. Sample is described in Straus, M. A., & Michel-Smith, Y. (2014). Mutuality, severity, and chronicity of violence by Father-Only, Mother-Only, and mutually violent parents as reported by university students in 15 nations. Child Abuse Negl, 38(4), 664-676. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.10.004
Prevalence of childhood rejection of Men: 53%Women: 57%
The high rate is because child was classified as rejected if either parent’s rejection score was at or above 60th percentile. The bars indicate the % of that subgroup in each type
27
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
12
21
67
Dyadic Concordance Type
Concordance Between Parents in Corporal Punishment At Age 10 of University Students in 15 nations (N=11,408)
% Of Families
Straus, M.A. Crime by University Students In 15 Nations: Links To Spanking And Positive Parenting At Age 10 By Father, Mother, And Both Parents. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology annual meeting. Atlanta, Georgia. 22 November, 2013
DT-CP 02
%
Taylor, C. A., Lee, S. J., Guterman, N. B., & Rice, J. C. (2010). Use of Spanking for 3-Year-Old Children and Associated Intimate Partner Aggression or Violence. Pediatrics, 415-424.
Father-Only Mother-Only Both-Spanked0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
19
36
45Spanked in past month:65%
Concordance Between Parents In Spanking 3 Year Old Children in The Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study (n=1,997)
Dyadic Concordance Type
Father-Only Pun-ishes
Mother-Only Pun-ishes
Both Punish28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
31
36
33
Chart Title
%
Dyadic Concordance Types For High Punishment of Child for Dependency By Parents Of 158 Children In 3rd Grade
29
Prevalence 72%
Mother-Father r= -.04
Punishment for Dependency-Rewards and punishments of various intensities administered by socializing agent when child asks for help. Ex- ample: What do you usually do when NAME asks for help? (Each response was rated by three
Eron, L., et al. (1961). "Comparison of data obtained from mothers and fathers on childrearing practices and their relation to child aggression." Child Development 32: 457-472.
PART BEffects Of Being In each
Dyadic Concordance Type
1. Relation of Couple DCTs ToPartner Problems
31
Neither
Male
-Only
Female
-Only
Both Assa
ulted
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Depression
Dyadic Concordance Type
Figure 3. Relation Of Concordance In Assault Between Partners To Depression Of1,026 Predominantly Low Income Men Presenting At Urban Public Hospital Emergency Room
Rhodes, Karin V., Houry, Debra, Cerulli, Catherine, Straus, Helen, Kaslow, Nadine J., & McNutt, Louise-Anne. (2009). Intimate Partner Violence and Comorbid Mental Health Conditions Among Urban Male Patients. Annals of Family Medicine, 7(1), 47-55. doi: 10.1370/afm.936
Couple assault rate37%
32
Self-Only Partner-Only Both-Abuse*8.5
9
9.5
10
10.5
11
11.5
12
12.5
13Women
Men
Depressive symptoms
Relation Of Concordance In Abuse Of Partner* To DepressionAt Previous Interview
Dyadic Concordance Type
Renner, L. M., & Whitney, S. D. (2012). Risk factors for unidirectional and bidirectional intimate partner violence among young adults. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36(1), 40-52. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.07.007
* Abuse=one or more times: • Threatened assault• Assault• Insisted on sex• Injured partner
Men WomenDepression mean 9.67 11.1Abused partner % 43% 50%
33
Relation of Dyadic Concordance In Partner Assault To DepressionDating Relationships Of University Students In 15 Nations (N=11,408)
Women
Men
No Violence: Women higher in depression than menAmong Victims: Women victims higher in depression than male victimsAmong Perpetrators: Male perpetrators higher in depression than femaleBoth Assault, i.e. both are victims and also perpetrators: Men higher in depression
WHODepression
Scale Percentile
34
Neither
Male
-Only
Female
-Only
Both-Coerce
38
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
Women
Men
Mental Health
(T score)
Relation of Dyadic Concordance In Lifetime Sexual Coercion To Poor Mental Health Probability sample of 3,496 adults Age 18-64 In Six European Cities)
Dyadic Concordance Type
Costa, Diogo, Hatzidimitriadou, Eleni, Ioannidi-Kapolou, Elli, Lindert, Jutta, Soares, Joaquim, Sundin, Örjan, . . . Barros, Henrique. (2014). Intimate partner violence and health-related quality of life in European men and women: findings from the DOVE study. Quality of Life Research, 1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0766-9
Note: Dependent variable is positive Mental Health
2. Relation of Parent Behavior to Child Problems
36
Rejection By Parents Is Associated With Criminal Beliefs, Especially When Both Parents Are Perceived As Rejecting
% with high score
on CriminalBeliefs scale
• Male students are more likely to have criminal beliefs
• Criminogenic effect of rejection by mothers and by fathers about the same
• Effect of parental rejection is very small for female students
• Example of Criminal Beliefs scale question: It is ok to buy something you knew was stolen
Dyadic Concordance Types of Parental Rejection *
*Among students with rejection scores 60th percentile for one parent.
37
Both-Violent
Mother-Only
Father-Only
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Each Dyadic Concordance Type For Violence Between Parents Is Associated WithA Different Probability Of The Child Later Assaulting A Partner
Dyadic Concordance
In Assault Between Parents
At Time 1
Percent Increase in Probability Of Assaulting Current Partner
Fehringer, J. A., & Hindin, M. J. (2008). Like Parent, Like Child: Intergenerational Transmission of Partner Violence in Cebu, the Philippines. Journal of Adolescent Health, 44(4), 363-371. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.08.012
38
Both-Assault type: the most intergenerational transmission
Other studies seem to show that it is the Father-Only type because that is the only type studied
“sex of parent by sex of child” effect:
• For boys, Father-Only more associated with assaulting a partner than Mother-Only DT• For girls, mother-only more associated with assaulting a dating partner
Example of DTs improving studies of children’s exposure parental Violence
When Children Are Exposed To Violence Between Parents, The Dyadic Type Make A Difference In he Probability Of Intergenerational Transmission
Straus, M. A., & Michel-Smith, Y. (2012). Relation of violence between parents of university students in 15 nations to student criminogenic beliefs and crime: A comparison of father-only, mother-only, and mutual parental violence Paper presented at the American Society Of Criminology annual meeting, Chicago, 15 November, 2012.
39Straus, M. A. (1992). Children as witnesses to marital violence: A risk factor for life long problems among a nationally representative sample of American men and women. In D. F. Schwartz (Ed.), Children and Violence: Report of the Twenty Third Ross Roundtable on Critical Approaches to Common Pediatric Problems (pp. 98-109). Columbus, Ohio: Ross Laboratories.
Both-Violent is most criminogenic
When only one parent assaulted:
• Assaults: Mother-Only & Father-Only had similar effects
• Arrests: Father-Only more criminogenic than Mother-Only
40Ulman, A., & Straus, M. A. (2003). Violence by children against mothers in relation to violence between parents and corporal punishment by parents. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 34(1), 41-60. Fig 3, p. 53
Violence Between Parents Is Associated With Child Hitting Parents, Especially If Mother Was the Only Parent Who Assaulted