a level assessment of composing

6
1 Music A level Assessment of Composing – Research into teacher attitudes Kirsty Devaney and Martin Fautley, Birmingham City University 10 November 2015 Executive Summary This paper reports on and discusses the results of a nationwide survey of secondary school music teachers’ experiences in the assessment of composing in UK A‐level music examinations. Data were collected through an online survey in May 2015 and 9 follow‐up telephone interviews. The nationwide survey garnered 71 responses from teachers with experience of A‐level music exams across a variety of state and independent school contexts. This paper reports that the majority of music teachers have experienced inconsistent external examination marking, and, as a consequence, do not feel confident to accurately predict student grades. It also found that teachers feel external examination assessment requirements are not clear, and that many schools send compositions back for remarking after results are in. Follow‐up interviews affirm that inconsistent marking has a direct impact on how composing is taught at A‐level. Secondary school music teachers face increasing pressure to fulfil requirements set by examination criteria, but also wish to give their students a fulfilling creative musical experience. Past examiners of A‐level composition who responded to the survey reported a lack of confidence in the system and their training. The results bring into question the subjectivity of assessment in this aspect of the music examination and the place of composing and creativity in A‐level assessment. These results come at a time when governmental focus on ‘rigorous and demanding’ examinations in the arts, and the introduction of the EBacc, are putting an increased strain on classroom music teachers. Survey and Discussion The survey began by asking the question “Have you ever been surprised by an examination grade for any of your pupils for composition at AS or A Level?”. The results are quite overwhelming: Figure 1: Over 90% of responding teachers say that this has been the case. In assessment terms this does beg questions as to issues of validity, and, importantly, reliability of this assessment. Teachers were given a free‐text opportunity to expand on any surprises that they had with A‐level composing grades. The ‘top 10’ results of this are shown in figure 2.

Upload: incorporated-society-of-musicians-ism

Post on 24-Jul-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

1

MusicAlevelAssessmentofComposing–ResearchintoteacherattitudesKirstyDevaneyandMartinFautley,BirminghamCityUniversity10November2015ExecutiveSummaryThispaperreportsonanddiscussestheresultsofanationwidesurveyofsecondaryschoolmusicteachers’experiencesintheassessmentofcomposinginUKA‐levelmusicexaminations.DatawerecollectedthroughanonlinesurveyinMay2015and9follow‐uptelephoneinterviews.Thenationwidesurveygarnered71responsesfromteacherswithexperienceofA‐levelmusicexamsacrossavarietyofstateandindependentschoolcontexts.Thispaperreportsthatthemajorityofmusicteachershaveexperiencedinconsistentexternalexaminationmarking,and,asaconsequence,donotfeelconfidenttoaccuratelypredictstudentgrades.Italsofoundthatteachersfeelexternalexaminationassessmentrequirementsarenotclear,andthatmanyschoolssendcompositionsbackforremarkingafterresultsarein.Follow‐upinterviewsaffirmthatinconsistentmarkinghasadirectimpactonhowcomposingistaughtatA‐level.Secondaryschoolmusicteachersfaceincreasingpressuretofulfilrequirementssetbyexaminationcriteria,butalsowishtogivetheirstudentsafulfillingcreativemusicalexperience.PastexaminersofA‐levelcompositionwhorespondedtothesurveyreportedalackofconfidenceinthesystemandtheirtraining.TheresultsbringintoquestionthesubjectivityofassessmentinthisaspectofthemusicexaminationandtheplaceofcomposingandcreativityinA‐levelassessment.Theseresultscomeatatimewhengovernmentalfocuson‘rigorousanddemanding’examinationsinthearts,andtheintroductionoftheEBacc,areputtinganincreasedstrainonclassroommusicteachers.SurveyandDiscussionThesurveybeganbyaskingthequestion“HaveyoueverbeensurprisedbyanexaminationgradeforanyofyourpupilsforcompositionatASorALevel?”.Theresultsarequiteoverwhelming:Figure1:

Over90%ofrespondingteacherssaythatthishasbeenthecase.Inassessmenttermsthisdoesbegquestionsastoissuesofvalidity,and,importantly,reliabilityofthisassessment.Teachersweregivenafree‐textopportunitytoexpandonanysurprisesthattheyhadwithA‐levelcomposinggrades.The‘top10’resultsofthisareshowninfigure2.

2

Figure2

Anumberofthecommentsmadebyteachersherearemostrevealing.Hereisarepresentativeselection:

“Individualvoiceamongstthebeststudentsseemstogounrecognised.Examinersareconfidentdealingwithamixtureofthebanalandpastiche.”

“Ihavehadasurpriseonseveraloccasions.ThemostmemorableareaveryweakstudentwhocomposedaveryformulaicpiecegettinganAwithanestimateofahopefulD.ThesameyearanoutstandingandinnovativecompositionfromastudentwhohadwonnationalyouthcompositionawardsgotaD.”

“Everyyearthereisalackofconsistency.Weneverknowwherewestand”

“3compositionsweresubmittedforASfrom3students.2IexpectedtogainnearfullmarksandonearoundaC.OnegainedaC,oneanEandoneaU.AsatrainedcomposerIfeelIreallyunderstandthisareaofthecoursewellandcouldnotcomprehendthegrading.”

“MarkwassignificantlylowerthanIhadexpected.Thestudent,Ifelt,hadrealflairandtalentincomposition,andthiswasnotrecognised.Ihadtheworkremarked,andthemarkwentupsignificantly.”

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Remarkedsubmissionshaddifferentgrades

Teacherbelievethatexamfavouredcertaingenresorstylesofmusic

Teachersfoundmarkschemedifficulttointerpret

Teachersdidnotfeeltherewasintercohortstandardisation

Resultinggradehigherthanexpected

Candidatesgradesweresignificantlydifferentfromexpectations

Gradesdidnotseemtocorrelatewithstudentability

Creativemusicresponsesoftenscoredlowerthanpastiche

Commentsthatgradesweretoolowtoohigh

3

“Originalityandcompetenceseemedtogainfewmarks‐itseemsthatpastichecomposingagainstasetoftickboxesisrequired.”

TeacherconfidenceinpredictingexaminationgradesTeacherswereaskednexttorespondtothis“PleaseratehowstronglyyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatementsaboutassessmentatASand/orALevelcomposing”.Thesearetheresults:Iamconfidentatbeingabletoaccuratelypredictthegradesmypupilswillget:Figure3:

Whatthisshowsisthatisthat59.2%ofteacherseitherdisagreeorstronglydisagreewiththisstatement.Thisisaworryinglylargenumber,aspredictingA‐levelgradesuccessisanimportantpartofhelpingyoungpeoplewiththeexaminationpreparation.Thispointwasmadebyateacherinafreetextcomment:

Itistheleast"predictable"areaoftheA‐levelcourses.Whilstthe"middle"‐levelsubmissionsgetgradesconsistentwithpredictions,the"extremes"oftenthrowupsomeextraordinaryresults‐noneofwhichgivecluesaboutwhatcriteria(if,indeed,thereareany)theassessorsareusing.Itfrequentlyseemsarbitraryandbasedonthepassingwhimsyofthemoment.

Thenextstatementforteacherstorespondtowas“Resultsfromexaminationboardsareconsistent”.Herearetheirreplies:Figure4

Onceagainalargenumberofteachersdisagreewiththis,with74.7%reportingthatthiswasthecaseforthem.Thisisanotherdisturbingstatistic.Thecostsofexaminationentryarehigh,andteachersnothavingconfidenceinthe

4

consistency–orlackthereof–inexaminationmusicisworrying.Onceagainthisstatementisamplifiedbywhatteachershadtosayintheirfreetextresponses:

Ihavedonetrainingeveryyeartotrytobettermyskillatknowingwhatisbeingaskedfor,but10yearsinandIstillgetitwrong.Ifeelsorryforthestudentsandgivethemcautiousexpectedoutcomes,butdon'twanttogettheirhopesuptoomuch.It'smymostcontentiousissueinmusicexamteaching.Idounderstandhowitishardtobesubjectiveinmarkingcreativework,butthecriteriaarewoolly.

Soveryvariable.StudentwhoshouldhavegotaanAforcomposingandisnowstudyingmusicatOxfordwherehegotafirstlastyearforhiscompositionworkgotaDwhereamuchweakerstudentgotaB.Seemstobenoconsistencyonhowthemarkschemeisappliedbyexaminers.Whattheexamboardsayatcompositionmeetingsandcoursesdoesnottallywiththerealgradesthatcompositionsaremarkedat.Itisverydifficulttoguaranteethatastudentwillbemarkedconsistentlyandfairly.

Thenextstatementthattheparticipatingteacherswereinvitedtorespondtowasthis:“Theassessmentrequirementsareclearanditiseasytounderstandwhatisrequiredofthestudent”.Herearetheirreplies:Figure5:

Onceagainaworryinglyhighlevelofresponsesdonotagreewiththisstatement,with66.2%ofteacherssayingthatthiswasthecaseforthem.Interestinglytherewerenoteacherswho‘stronglyagreed’withthisstatement!Onceagaintheteacherswereunequivocalintheirfreetextresponses:

Iwouldlikemorespecificassessmentcriteriathataren’t‘wishy‐washy’.Theassessmentcriteriaandthemarkingcriteriaarewaytoovaguetobeaconstructivetoolinthecompositionprocess,forboththeteacherandthestudent.Thecriteriaarewaytooambiguousandneedtobeconsiderablymoredetailedand/orstructured‐morequantitativeguidelines/targets,asatthemomentitisvirtuallyallqualitative.

RemarkingofAlevelworkWehavealreadycommentedonthecostofA‐levelexaminationentries.Forthoseteachersandschoolsnothappywiththeresultstheirstudentsget,having

5

workremarkedisanoption,butonethatcomesatacost.Inthissurveytheteacherswereaskedthequestion“Howoftendoyouqueryanexaminationmarkand/oraskforre‐markingofASand/orALevelcompositions”.Herearetheresults:Figure6:

The‘other’responsesincludenewteachers,thosewhoseworkwasineligibleforremarking,andthosewheretherewerefinancialconstraintsthatpreventedit.Whattheseresultsshowisaconsistentpatternofregardingcomposingwork,with73.2%ofteacherssayingthatinthepastfewyearstheyhaveaskedforatleastonepieceofcomposingworktoberemarked.Thisisanothersignificantfigure,andonewhichraisesmanyconcernsagainwithregardtothevalidityofexaminationcomposingassessment.Thiscommentinthefreetextresponsesfromaformerexaminerisparticularlyworryinginthisrespect:

Musiccourseworkisnotremarkedblind,thereforerequestingremarksisnotalwaysproductiveasthereisatendencyforthemtocoveroneanother’sbacks.IknowthisfirsthandasIusedtobeanexaminer,butlackedfaithinthesystem/educationofcompositiontheyarepromoting.

Thisisnotanisolatedinstance,hereareanotherformerexaminer’scomments:

IhavebeenanexaminerforA2compositioninthepastandhaveseenfirsthandhowpiecescangetwildlydifferentmarksfromdifferentpeople.Marksdonotseemtobeconsistent.I'vehadfantasticstudentsgettinghighfaresineveryotherunitandthengettingU’sforcomposing.MarkschemesfortheboardIteachareveryvague,andalthoughtherearedifferentoptions,themarkschemeisthesameforeachone.Notenoughexamplesgivenouttoteacherswithreasonswhytheyattractcertainmarks.

Andyetanotherformerexaminersaidthis:

IhaveexaminedASandA2compositionandamawareoftheheatedargumentsandcompletedisparitybetweenexaminersatstandardisation

6

meetings.IhaveattendedINSETthisyearandwasabsolutelyspotonwiththecourseleaderwithmyassessments(otherteacherswerenot).HoweverIhavenofaithinmyjudgementsbeingaccuratelyreflectedonresultsday.

CommentaryWhatthisverybriefoverviewofteacherattitudestowardsA‐levelcomposingassessmentshowsisthatthereisagreatdealofdisquietinthesystem.Teachersreportedthattheyhavelittleconfidenceinthesystem,thattheyfeelthatgradingisnotconsistentorreliable,andthatA‐levelcomposingresultscanbesomethingofalottery.Ourrecommendationsarethatteachersseemtoneedhelpandreassuranceinanumberofspecificareas.Theseare:

Havinggreateraccesstoexemplarmaterials,withfullannotationsastowhat,how,andwhygradesareawarded

Teachersfeelthattheywouldbenefitfromspecificandconstructivefeedbackonstudentworkwhichhasbeensubmittedforre‐marking

Teachersrequestspecificandbetter‐focussedtrainingonboththeteachingandassessmentofcomposingatA‐level.

TeachersreportthattheyfeeltheycanmarkaccuratelyatGCSElevel,andthatGCSEseemsmuchmoreconsistentasaconsequence.TheywonderiftherearewaysinwhichbestpracticefromGCSEcouldbeappliedatA‐level

Althoughassessmentcriteriaexist,someteachersdonotfeeltheseareinterpreteduniformly,andthattherearebothinter‐cohortandintra‐cohortinconsistencies.

Someteachersfeelthatthereisthepossibilityofalackofunderstandingofsomestylesandgenresofmusicbytheexaminationboard,andthatthiscouldundulypenalisesomeoftheircandidates.

Weareconcernedthatthevagariesofexaminationcomposingwehavedescribedherearesuchthatforsometeachers,giventhechoice,theywouldnotentercandidatesforthiscomponent,thusremovingcomposingasataughtandlearnedactivityinschoolsatthislevel.GiventheamountofmoneythatthecreativeindustriesearnfortheUK,closingofftheopportunitiesforcreativecomposingatthisstageintheeducationofayoungpersonseemstobeashame.WhatwehavedocumentedhereisclearlyasmallbutrepresentativesampleofA‐levelmusicteachers.Weknowthatatpresentonly1%ofA‐levelentriesareformusic,andwewouldbesaddenedifthisnumberweretofallmuchfurther.ThiswouldalsoplaceA‐levelmusicatriskinschoolsandcollegeswheregroupsizesbecametoosmall.Whilsttherearesignificantconcernsinthisreport,wehopethatallstakeholderswillfindtheseresultsandourcommentarytobeofuse.