a new estimate of the milky way’s dark halo mass

13
Xiangxiang Xue Hans-Walter Rix , G. Zhao, P. Re Fiorentin, T. Naab, M. Steinmetz, E. F. Bell, F. C. van den Bosch, T. C. Beers, R. Wilhelm, Y. S. Lee, C. Rockosi, B. Yanny, H. Newberg, X. Kang, M. C. Smith, D. P. Schneider Dec 3 2008 KIAA-Cambridge Joint Workshop Motivation Methods Results

Upload: curt

Post on 05-Feb-2016

46 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

A New Estimate of the Milky Way’s Dark Halo Mass. Motivation Methods Results. Xiangxiang Xue Hans-Walter Rix , G. Zhao, P. Re Fiorentin, T. Naab, M. Steinmetz, E. F. Bell, F. C. van den Bosch, T. C. Beers, R. Wilhelm, Y. S. Lee, C. Rockosi, B. Yanny, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A New Estimate of the Milky Way’s Dark Halo Mass

Xiangxiang Xue

Hans-Walter Rix , G. Zhao, P. Re Fiorentin, T. Naab, M. Steinmetz, E.

F. Bell, F. C. van den Bosch, T. C. Beers, R. Wilhelm, Y. S. Lee, C.

Rockosi, B. Yanny,

H. Newberg, X. Kang, M. C. Smith, D. P. Schneider

Dec 3 2008 KIAA-Cambridge Joint Workshop

Motivation

Methods

Results

Page 2: A New Estimate of the Milky Way’s Dark Halo Mass

Milky Way properties scale with halo

mass

Mstar /Mhalo cooled baryon fraction

Number of expected sub-halos

The poorly known Galactic

parameter

Recent lit. values 0.8–2.5 x

1012 Mͽ

Are all satellites bound?

Why to estimate the MW halo mass?

Page 3: A New Estimate of the Milky Way’s Dark Halo Mass

How to estimate the MW halo mass?

Blitz 1990’s (HI)

Dehnen&Binney 1998

~200 discrete tracers

Battaglia, Helmi et al 2006

15kpc

Basic approach:

a)Assemble a large and well defined set of distant kinematic tracers from SDSS DR6

blue Horizontal Branch Stars with 5% distances to D~60 kpcv ~ 10 km/s + Fe/H estimates

b)Compare to kinematics in simulated halos that have been scaled to different halo mass

derive p(vlos) at different rgc

model it to get vcir(r)

Page 4: A New Estimate of the Milky Way’s Dark Halo Mass

Selection of the “clean” BHB sample

Pre-selected by color (Yanny et al 2000)

Measure Balmer line profile parameters

(cf Sirko et al 2004, Xue, Rix et al 2008)

identification >90%

Distances 5-10%Stars are metal

poor

solid line---BHB Star

dotted line---Blue Straggler star

SEGUE Survey SpectraLine Shape Parameters

2400 halo BHB stars

Page 5: A New Estimate of the Milky Way’s Dark Halo Mass

Spatial, velocity and [Fe/H] distributions of BHBs

velocity distribution

metallicity distribution

velocity dispersion

spatial distribution

Page 6: A New Estimate of the Milky Way’s Dark Halo Mass

Modelling the BHB kinematics with simulations

make “mock observations” from within the output of the cosmological (Milky Way-like) galaxy simulations, and then match P(Vlos /Vcir|r) to give Vcir,obs(r), and ultimately Mvir

How to estimate the MW halo mass?

use simulations from two different groups (Steinmetz, Naab)

same volume as SDSS DR6

derive P(Vlos/Vcir, r) for simulated halo stars

get P(Vlos/Vcir, r) for observed halo BHB stars

matching the distributions gives estimate of Vcir,obs(r)

[also use good ole’ Jean Eq.]

Page 7: A New Estimate of the Milky Way’s Dark Halo Mass
Page 8: A New Estimate of the Milky Way’s Dark Halo Mass

Red dots are halo BHB stars , while Black dots are simulated halo stars

Vesc(r) Vesc(r)Vcir(r) Vcir(r)

Mhalo ~ 2 × 1012 MͽMhalo ~ 1012 Mͽ

P(Vlos/Vcir)

Page 9: A New Estimate of the Milky Way’s Dark Halo Mass

Comparison of P(Vl.o.s/Vcir) in radial bin

[15.0,20.0] kpc

Psim(Vlos, / Vcir),

Pobs(Vl.o.s,/Vcir) if vcir(obs)=180km/s

Construct estimate of Vcir (r)

P(Vlos/Vcir, obs) = P(Vlos/Vcir, sim)

Page 10: A New Estimate of the Milky Way’s Dark Halo Mass

Vcir(r) derived by Jeans Equation

First, relate σlos,obs(r) to σr(r)

Then, use Jeans Equation for

Use observed (photometric) halo profile

ρ*~r-3.5

Estimate Vcir(r)

1. radially anisotropic case, β=0.37 (simulations)2. radially isotropic case, β=0.0

Page 11: A New Estimate of the Milky Way’s Dark Halo Mass

Estimate the DM halo mass

NFW DM halo + Hernquist bulge + exponential

disk

Rotation curve matches

Both ‘contracted’ and ‘uncontracted’ halos match

Mvir= 1.0± 0.3 × 1012 Mͽ

Page 12: A New Estimate of the Milky Way’s Dark Halo Mass

Result Robust measurement (2sims+Jeans Eq.)

M (r<60 kpc) = 4.0±0.7×1011 Mͽ

Vcirc(R) is not constant but gently falling,

and matches either contracted or

uncontracted NFW profile

If DM halo is NFW then

Mvir (~275kpc) = 1.0± 0.3 × 1012 Mͽ

consistent with previous estimates,

but more precise

Imply (high) 40% of baryons end up as

stars

LMC and other satellites marginally bound

V3D,LMC=378 km/s +- 18km/s(Besla et al 2007)

Page 13: A New Estimate of the Milky Way’s Dark Halo Mass

Thank You