a pathway and network review on beta-adrenoceptor signaling and beta blockers in cardiac remodeling
TRANSCRIPT
A pathway and network review on beta-adrenoceptor signalingand beta blockers in cardiac remodeling
Jihong Yang • Yufeng Liu • Xiaohui Fan •
Zheng Li • Yiyu Cheng
� Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013
Abstract It is well established that cardiac remodeling
plays a pivotal role in the development of heart failure, a
leading cause of death worldwide. Meanwhile, sympathetic
hyperactivity is an important factor in inducing cardiac
remodeling. Therefore, an in-depth understanding of beta-
adrenoceptor signaling pathways would help to find better
ways to reverse the adverse remodeling. Here, we reviewed
five pathways, namely mitogen-activated protein kinase
signaling, Gs–AC–cAMP signaling, Ca2?-calcineurin-
NFAT/CaMKII-HDACs signaling, PI3K signaling and
beta-3 adrenergic signaling, in cardiac remodeling. Fur-
thermore, we constructed a cardiac-remodeling-specific
regulatory network including miRNA, transcription factors
and target genes within the five pathways. Both experi-
mental and clinical studies have documented beneficial
effects of beta blockers in cardiac remodeling; neverthe-
less, different blockers show different extent of therapeutic
effect. Exploration of the underlying mechanisms could
help developing more effective drugs. Current evidence of
treatment effect of beta blockers in remodeling was also
reviewed based upon information from experimental data
and clinical trials. We further discussed the mechanism of
how beta blockers work and why some beta blockers are
more potent than others in treating cardiac remodeling
within the framework of cardiac remodeling network.
Keywords Beta-adrenoceptor signaling � Beta blocker �Cardiac remodeling � Network biology � Heart failure
Introduction
Cardiac remodeling was deemed as a determinant of clinical
course of heart failure. It comprises structural and functional
changes at different levels, such as molecular, cellular, tissue
and whole-organ levels [1]. It is well established that
hemodynamic load and neurohormonal activation are major
factors that have influences on cardiac remodeling. Changes
in hemodynamic load include reactive ventricular hyper-
trophy, progressive ventricular dilation, left ventricular wall
tension, stress increase and further dilation of the heart, while
neurohormonal activation is greatly related to increased
plasma and tissue levels of neurohormones, such as norepi-
nephrine, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), renin and aldo-
sterone [2]. These indicate that beta-adrenergic regulation
and renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) regula-
tion play crucial roles in the process of cardiac remodeling.
The neurohormonal activity of renin–angiotensin–aldoste-
rone axis and its molecular effects on the heart have been
reviewed by Gajarsa and Kloner [3]. It was clearly shown
which components are contained in the system, how bio-
logical agents, such as renin, angiotensin-converting enzyme
(ACE), angiotensin II and aldosterone, interact with other
components, effects of these components, and how phar-
maceutical agents, namely direct renin inhibitor, ACE
inhibitor, angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) and aldo-
sterone inhibitor, work in the system. In this review, we
focused on beta-adrenergic regulation, another important
influencing factor in the process of cardiac remodeling.
Although the exact process of cardiac remodeling is still
not clearly understood, cardiomyocyte lengthening is one
J. Yang � Y. Liu � X. Fan (&) � Y. Cheng
Pharmaceutical Informatics Institute, College of Pharmaceutical
Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
e-mail: [email protected]
Z. Li (&)
State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine,
Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,
Tianjin 300193, China
e-mail: [email protected]
123
Heart Fail Rev
DOI 10.1007/s10741-013-9417-4
of the important and certain processes [4, 5]. As myocyte
stretch, local norepinephrine activity increases leading to
activation of beta-adrenergic receptor (beta-AR). Beta-AR,
where the beta-adrenergic regulation starts, belongs to the
superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) or
seven transmembrane receptors and can be subdivided into
three subtypes, beta-1, beta-2 and beta-3 AR, with the
expression level of beta-1 AR being the highest, and beta-3
AR being the lowest in the heart [6]. Different subtypes can
mediate different signaling pathways [7]. Notably, some
are underlying the important cellular changes of remodel-
ing, such as myocyte hypertrophy, apoptosis and fibrosis
[1]. Therefore, a full understanding of these mechanisms
can broaden our understanding of finding ways to reverse
pathological remodeling and cardiac dysfunction. Beta
blocker directly targets the beta-adrenergic receptor and
has been shown to have beneficial effects on cardiac
remodeling [8, 9]. Better understanding of the anti-
remodeling mechanisms will benefit us in discovery and
development of more successful drugs. Thus, we will focus
on the beta-adrenoceptor pathways and networks that
mediate cardiac remodeling and mechanisms of beta
blockers in reversing cardiac remodeling.
Beta-adrenoceptor signaling in cardiac remodeling
Many mechanisms underlying cardiac remodeling when
induced by beta-AR stimulation have been revealed, such as
mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling, Gs–
AC–cAMP signaling, Ca2?-calcineurin-NFAT/CaMKII-
HDACs signaling, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)
signaling, beta-3 adrenergic signaling, renin–angiotensin–
aldosterone system, interleukin-6/signal transducers and
activator of transcription 3 (IL-6/STAT3) signaling and
transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta signaling. In this
review, we will focus on the first five pathways and briefly
discuss other pathways.
MAPK signaling
Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are cytosolic
signaling proteins and consist of three subfamilies, namely
extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK1/2), c-jun
N-terminal kinases (JNKs) and p38 MAP kinase [10].
MAPK cascades are one of the most thoroughly studied
signal transduction systems, and it is well accepted that the
cascades are closely related to cardiac remodeling [10–12]. It
has been demonstrated that these proteins can be activated by
beta-AR stimulation both in vitro and in vivo [13–16]. In
response to beta-AR stimulation, nicotinamide adenine
dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidases can be activated
and promote the production of reactive oxygen species
(ROS). ROS is an important activator in cardiac MAPK
cascades and activates the guanosine triphosphate (GTP)
small G-protein (Ras), which induces Raf-1 kinase translo-
cation to plasma membrane. Raf-1 then phosphorylates
MEK proteins and in turn activates extracellular signal-
regulated kinases (ERKs), and functions as regulators in the
pathophysiological hypertrophy [10, 17, 18]. Li et al. [19]
recently demonstrated that RSK (downstream protein of
ERK) mediated the process via phosphorylation of a cardiac
transcriptional factor, GATA4, a critical regulator of cardiac
hypertrophy. In addition, excessive stimulation of beta-ARs
in the heart increases both cardiac Ang II production and
angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity [20]. Ang II
increases phospho-ERK1/2, thus leading to cardiac hyper-
trophy. Noma et al. [21] also showed that ERK can be acti-
vated by beta1-AR stimulation through beta-arrestin-
mediated transactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor
(EGFR). JNKs and p38 MAPK were suggested functioning
as mediators of cardiac remodeling. Some studies showed
that increased expression of MEK1/MEK7 (activator of
JNKs) and increased level of p38 MAPK phosphorylation
led to cardiac hypertrophy [22–24]. However, other studies
showed opposite conclusions [25–27]. In summary,
enhanced MAPK signaling was shown to promote hyper-
trophic cardiac remodeling, while the role of JNKs and p38
MAPK remains to be elucidated.
Gs–AC–cAMP signaling
Gs/AC/cAMP signaling cascade is a classic beta-AR sig-
naling pathway. Its harmful effects, such as cardiac
hypertrophy, fibrosis and dysfunction, have been revealed
in a series of experiments [28–31]. Both beta-1 AR and
beta-2 AR couple to Gs, which in turn activate adenylyl
cyclase (AC) and induce cAMP accumulation and protein
kinase A (PKA) activation. PKA phosphorylates cAMP-
response binding protein (CREB) and cAMP-response
element modulator (CREM). Lewin et al. [32] showed that
inactivation of CREM prevents beta-1 AR-overexpressing
mice from cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, fibrosis and left
ventricular dysfunction. However, another study showed
that CREB activation protected spontaneously hypertensive
rats (SHRs) from cardiac remodeling via inhibition of
cardiac apoptosis [33].
In addition, PKA plays a pivotal role in the circulation
of Ca2?, an important signaling molecule closely related to
cardiac remodeling in the cardiomyocyte. Activated PKA
phosphorylates sarcolemmal L-type Ca2? channels (LTCC)
and sarcoplasmic ryanodine receptors (RyR2) to increase
intracellular Ca2?. Phosphorylated phospholamban (PLB)
by PKA relieves its inhibition of sarcoplasmic reticulum
(SR) Ca2?-ATPase (SERCA2a), which triggers cytosolic
Ca2? reuptake into sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) [34, 35].
Heart Fail Rev
123
PP1 inhibitor-1 (I-1) is also activated by PKA and inhibits
the effect of SERCA2a, resulting in amplification of
intracellular Ca2? [36–38]. Interestingly, I-1 can be deac-
tivated by calcineurin, thus constituting a connection
between two cardiac remodeling-related pathways, namely
cAMP-dependent pathway and Ca2?-calcineurin-NFAT
signaling pathway [39, 40].
Another recognized target for cAMP is Epac (exchange
protein directly activated by cAMP), which catalyzes the
exchange of GDP from GTP on small GTPase Rap [41–
44]. Expression of Epac1, one isoform of Epac, is increased
in hypertrophic myocardium, and silencing of the gene
blocks the hypertrophic effect of isoprenaline (ISO) in vitro
[45]. Epac1 is recruited at the plasma membrane by ISO
stimulation and activates H-Ras via Rap2B-PLC signaling.
It triggers the nuclear export of HADC4 (histone deace-
tylase 4) through CaMKII-dependent phosphorylation, with
the consequent activation of prohypertrophic transcription
factor MEF2 (myocyte enhancer factor 2) [46–48].
Ca2?-calcineurin-NFAT/CaMKII-HDACs signaling
Calcium is a signaling molecule necessary for activating
hypertrophic responses. The beta-AR-induced increase in
intracellular Ca2? is a complicated process. Under chronic
stimulation, beta-AR mediates PKA activation and sub-
sequent phosphorylation of LCCs and RyRs, which induces
rapid increase in intracellular Ca2? [34]. The increase in
intracellular Ca2? activates many downstream signaling
factors, including calcineurin- and calmodulin-dependent
protein kinase II (CaMKII), both of which play crucial
roles in corresponding hypertrophic pathways. However,
the source of Ca2? for activation of hypertrophic pathway
has been controversial for a long time. T-type Ca2?
channels (TTCC) [49], transient receptor potential channels
(TRPC) [50, 51] and L-type Ca2? channels (LTCC) [52–
54] were all previously reported as the entry. Chen et al.
[55] recently showed that Ca2? influx through the LTCC is
the major source of Ca2?, and cytosolic Ca2? activates
calcineurin-NFAT signaling [56], while sarcoplasmic
reticulum (SR) nuclear envelop Ca2? release activates
CaMKII/HDAC pathway. Calcineurin dephosphorylates its
downstream signaling factor NFAT, resulting in translo-
cation of NFAT proteins to the nucleus and activation of
many hypertrophic genes [57]. CaMKII-mediated phos-
phorylation of class II histone decatalases (HDACs),
especially HDAC4 and HDAC5, derepresses MEF2-med-
iated gene expression [58]. CaMKIId phosphorylates
HDAC4 preferentially compared with HDAC5, leading to
activation of hypertrophic genes [59].
In addition to the effect in hypertrophy, CaMKII-
induced apoptosis appears to play a role in contributing to
cardiac remodeling, and the process can be induced by a
variety of downstream mechanisms, such as the activation
of proapoptotic protease AP24 [60] and proapoptotic
factor Bcl10. Moreover, CaMKII can increase expression
of proapoptotic genes, downstream of MAPK kinase,
TAK1 [61] and ASK1 [62, 63]. With sustained beta1-AR
stimulation, CaMKII can be activated not only by
increased intracellular Ca2? that follows PKA-dependent
phosphorylation of Ca2? homeostatic proteins, but also
via the PKA-independent primary mitochondrial death
pathway [64, 65].
PI3K signaling
PI3K has been proven playing important roles in cell sur-
vival [66]. In cultured cardiomyocytes, beta-AR stimula-
tion increases PI3K activity [67, 68]. Both beta-1 AR and
beta-2 AR have been reported to transactivate PI3K in vitro
[69, 70] and in vivo [71].
PI3K alpha [72, 73] and PI3K gamma [72, 74] play
distinct roles in heart structure and function, and the latter
is also involved in pathological hypertrophy [74–76]. In a
recent study, Guo et al. [77] showed that the loss of PI3K
gamma led to enhanced cAMP generation resulting from a
loss of phosphodiesterase activity. The increased cAMP
levels activate phosphorylation of CREB, which could bind
to a cAMP-response element that is encoded in promoter
region of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2) and matrix
metalloproteinase-13 (MMP13) genes [78]. Thus, it leads
to increased MMP2 and MMP13 expression and activity.
Both of them are associated with cardiac remodeling, and
inhibition of them has shown favorable effects in pressure-
overload-induced cardiac remodeling [79]. In particular,
both MMP2 inhibition [80] and MMP2 gene deletion [81]
ameliorated hypertensive cardiac remodeling, and recent
research [82] also indicates that its polymorphisms may
modulate left ventricular remodeling.
In addition to two above-mentioned PI3 kinases, several
downstream factors of beta-AR-induced transactivation of
PI3K–Akt signaling pathway also play important roles in
the process of cardiac remodeling. Notably, increasing
evidences showed that beta-2 AR, but not beta-1 AR,
activates PI3K–Akt signaling pathway in a Gi-Gbc-
dependent manner [83–86]. Regulation of cell proliferation
and cellular protection against apoptosis in neonatal
cardiomyocytes are well-known result of activation of the
pathway [87, 88]. Akt phosphorylates the proapoptotic Bcl-
2 family member BAD [89, 90] and prevents BAD from
binding to Bcl-xl and Bcl-2, members of the Bcl-2 family
of proteins, thus releasing them for a cell survival response
[91]. Moreover, Akt also activates endothelial nitric oxide
synthase (eNOS) at Ser1177 and thereby promotes NO
production, which has favorable effects in cardiovascular
diseases [92].
Heart Fail Rev
123
Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3) is another impor-
tant target of Akt and consists of two isoforms in human,
namely GSK-3a and GSK-3b [93]. The latter has been
shown inactivated by Akt under beta-adrenergic stimula-
tion in cardiac myocytes [67]. GSK-3b phosphorylates a
wide variety of cardiac transcriptional factors, such as
GATA4 [94], atrial natriuretic factors (ANF) [67] and
nuclear factors of activated cells (NFAT) [95], which leads
to induction of cardiac hypertrophy. The phosphorylation
of GSK-3a is also greatly increased under beta-AR stim-
ulation [71, 96], but its functions are far less clear than that
of GSK-3b. However, GSK-3a is becoming a focus in
recent years for its role in regulating cardiac remodeling
[96, 97]. Constitutive GSK-3a activity protects against
maladaptive remodeling secondary to chronic beta-AR
stimulation [96]. GSK-3a also negatively regulates hyper-
trophic growth [98, 99], and one of the key mechanisms is
dysfunction of mTORC1, which is a critical regulator in
cell growth [100]. In addition, Zhou et al. [98] found that
GSK-3a probably interacted with beta-adrenergic receptor/
G-protein-coupled receptor kinase/beta-arrestin and served
as a positive feedback loop to enhance beta-adrenergic
signaling, thereby preserving contractile function and left
ventricular (LV) function. Yet, in two earlier studies, they
have suggested that increased activity of GSK-3a induces
LV dysfunction in a transgenic and a knockin model,
respectively [99, 101]. The role of GSK-3a in cardiac
remodeling remains unclear, and more work is needed to
completely elucidate it.
The forkhead box family of transcription factors (FOXOs)
are also critical downstream elements of PI3K/Akt signaling
pathway. Zhang et al. [86] have demonstrated that phos-
phorylation level of both FOXO1 (Thr24) and FOXO3a
(Thr32, Ser318/321, Ser253) is significantly increased by
acute beta-AR stimulation for the first time. FOXOs have
been widely reported closely related to cardiac hypertrophy
and remodeling and treated as negative regulators [102–
106]. Moreover, the mechanism seems clear: The phos-
phorylated FOXOs is segregated in cytoplasm, thus results in
absence of nuclear active FOXOs, and the latter can promote
the transcription of atrogin-1 to inactivate cardiac tran-
scription factor NFAT via calcineurin.
Beta-3 adrenergic signaling
Beta-3 AR was first cloned by Emorine et al. (1989) [107]
and showed the role of mediating lipolysis [108] and ther-
mogenesis [109] in adipose tissue. However, many recent
reports indicated that beta-3 AR was also expressed in human
heart and closely related to cardiac remodeling. Whether
overexpression of beta-3 AR has favorable effects is still
controversial. Cheng et al. [110] reported the detrimental
effects and Zhao et al. [111] showed that changes in
expression coincide with ventricular remodeling. Some
other studies got opposite conclusions. For example, sig-
nificant exacerbation of pathologic remodeling was revealed
in mice lacking beta-3 AR [112], and chronic stimulation of
beta-3 AR was effective in reducing cardiac remodeling
[113]. Therefore, these reports regard activation of beta-3
AR as a cardioprotective factor, and negative inotropic
effects induced by the receptor could have favorable effects
in reversing cardiac remodeling [114].
It is well recognized that the negative inotropic effects
result from activation of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) sig-
naling through Gi proteins in cardiomyocytes [112, 113,
115, 116]. The synthesized nitric oxide (NO) binds to and
activates NO–guanylyl cyclase (NO–GC) [117], and sub-
sequent activation of NO–GC increases conversion of GTP
to cGMP, which could target many cellular proteins [118],
such as cGMP-dependent protein kinases (PKGs), cGMP-
gated cation channels and cyclic nucleotide phosphodies-
terases (PDEs). cGMP-dependent protein kinase I (PKGI)
isozymes play a pivotal role in mediating major effects
induced by NO–cGMP signaling [119, 120]. Its activation
has been shown to induce negative inotropic action, and the
proposed mechanism, action through inhibition of LTCC,
has been verified from different aspects [121–123].
Nitric oxide production is a key step in nitric oxide
synthase signaling, and both endothelial nitric oxide syn-
thase (eNOS) and neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS)
are involved in the process. However, the primary isoform
participating in beta3-induced negative inotropic action has
been an important topic for a long time [113, 115, 116,
124, 125]. Endothelial NOS has been previously suggested
as the one that is solely responsible for beta3-induced
negative inotropy. However, in the study of Napp et al.
[126], NO-dependent negative inotropic effect was still
observed even though the eNOS-derived NO is decreased.
Thus, the role of eNOS as primary isoform is challenged.
Until recently, a recent study [113] made a clear elucida-
tion of the above-mentioned paradox. The activity of eNOS
can be activated by phosphorylation at Ser1177 and
deactivated by phosphorylation at Ser114 [127–129], and
eNOS is deactivated by an increase in Ser114 phosphory-
lation and a decrease in Ser1177 phosphorylation under
beta-3 AR stimulation. Furthermore, BRL (a beta-3 ago-
nist) treatment has no effect on eNOS recoupling. Hence,
eNOS is not the sole pathway for beta-3 AR. On the other
hand, nNOS protein expression is upregulated by beta-3
AR stimulation and attributes to maintaining equilibrium
of myocardial NO and reactive oxygen species (ROS)
production. Moreover, nNOS-/- mice developed more
severe LV remodeling. Therefore, nNOS is supported to be
the primary downstream NOS isoform participating in
beta-3 induced negative inotropy.
Heart Fail Rev
123
Extensive efforts have been made to better understand
the relationship between beta-3 AR signaling and cardiac
remodeling, but few studies have illustrated precise
mechanisms. Due to limited knowledge about the beta-3
AR signaling, whether activation of beta-3 AR is favorable
requires further studies.
Other signaling pathways
In addition to the above-mentioned five signaling path-
ways, other signaling pathways, such as RAAS, IL-6/
STAT3 signaling and TGF-b signaling, are also induced by
beta-AR activation and take part in the process of cardiac
remodeling. Under stimulation, expression of Ang II [20],
IL-6 [130] and TGF-b [131], the key regulators of these
pathways, is increased. Thereafter, (1) increased Ang II
levels could lead to cardiac hypertrophy in vitro and in vivo
[132–134]; (2) both IL-6 and Ang II could activate STAT3,
which acts as a transcriptional factor, thus promoting car-
diac hypertrophy [135]; and (3) overexpression of TGF-b
has also been demonstrated to lead to fibrosis and hyper-
trophy in transgenic mice [136]. All of these pathways are
closely related to cardiac remodeling.
Taken together, beta-adrenergic regulation plays an
important role in the pathogenesis of cardiac remodeling.
In particular, some biological molecules, such as SER-
CA2a, ERK, CaMKII, GSK-3a, GSK-3b, PKGI, MMP2,
STAT3 and TGF-b, could be potential targets for future
therapeutic approaches in the setting of cardiac remodel-
ing. A summary of the pathways involved in cardiac
remodeling can be found in Fig. 1.
Systems network of cardiac remodeling
To get a more systematic perspective of cardiac remodeling
process, we further built a regulatory network specific to
cardiac remodeling. We collected miRNAs and TFs that
have been reported involved in cardiac remodeling, and then
identified target genes of miRNAs and TFs from miRTar-
Base (Release 3.5, http://mirtarbase.mbc.nctu.edu.tw/) [137]
Fig. 1 Five beta-adrenoceptor signaling pathways mediated cardiac
remodeling. Different colors represent different signaling pathways.
Red Gs–AC–cAMP signaling; orange Ca2?-calcineurin-NFAT/
CaMKII-HDACs signaling; green MAPK signaling; blue Beta3-
adrenergic signaling; black PI3K signaling. Detailed information is
discussed in the text
Heart Fail Rev
123
and TFactS (Version 2, Sign-Sensitive catalogue, http://www.
tfacts.org/TFactS-new/TFactS-v2/index1.html) [138]. In
addition, we collected gene sets of the five discussed pathways
based on literature and confined connections between miR-
NA-target gene and TF-target gene via the collected gene sets.
Combined with protein–protein interaction of HPRD database
(http://hprd.org/) [139], a regulatory network was built based
upon regulatory interactions between miRNA and genes, and
protein interactions. The network contains 192 nodes and 438
edges (see Fig. 2, data available in supplementary files).
From the network, we can make a systematic investiga-
tion of miRNAs and TFs that are involved in pathways (see
Table 1). Taking the function of TFs and miRNAs into
account, it will benefit us to better understand the role of
these pathways in cardiac remodeling. Different pathways
may be involved in the same biological process, and this
triggers people to find out whether there exist some common
regulators. miRNAs, which have been seen as master regu-
lators of cellular processes [140], may regulate a series of
pathways and result in the same phenotype. miR-21, miR-
34a, miR-20a, miR-17 and miR-29a are common miRNAs
between PI3K signaling and MAPK signaling via analysis of
the network. miR-21 could target PTEN, leading to activa-
tion of ERK1/2 and AKT signaling pathway that follows
increased expression of HIF-1a and VEGF, and promotes
angiogenesis [141]. In addition, miR-34a has been proven as
a regulator of cellular responses to growth factor signaling
and dampens the proliferative and prosurvival effects path-
ways mediated by ERK and AKT [142].
The network also provided us a platform to view the
pathways in a more relevant context. Taking ‘‘PI3K sig-
naling,’’ for example, the relevant factors such as miR-195,
miR-181b, CREB and FOXO3 are involved in regulation
of cardiac myocyte hypertrophy, upregulation of miR-20a
and miR-21 is reported to inhibit apoptosis, members of
miR-29 family are involved in regulating extracellular
matrix, miR-126 and c-Myc are involved in regulating
cardiac angiogenesis, and activation of STAT3 can con-
tribute to improved LV function by inhibiting fibrosis. All
these above-mentioned biological processes regulated by
microRNAs and TFs are important in the process of
remodeling. Thus, it also indicates that PI3K signaling
plays roles in different stages of cardiac remodeling.
Beta blocker in cardiac remodeling
Based on the study of mechanisms of remodeling, various
types of drugs can be used for inhibiting or reversing
remodeling, such as ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II type I
receptor (AT1R) blockers (ARBs), beta blockers and
mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) [143]. Beta
blockers are widely used in hypertension and ischemia
heart disease for negative inotropic effect clinically, and
the first clinically significant beta blockers are invented by
Sir James Whyte Black. However, beta blockers were not
used for the treatment of cardiac remodeling and heart
failure initially, but considered contraindicated in patients
with chronic heart failure owing to their negative inotropic
action on myocardial contractility [144]. With decades of
research, understanding of pathogenesis of cardiac
remodeling is no longer confined to systolic dysfunction,
but also includes neuroendocrine abnormalities. Thus, beta
blockers are introduced as therapeutic agents of cardiac
remodeling due to its capability to inhibit neurohormonal
activation induced by beta-AR stimulation.
Clinical trials
Clinical trials on studying the beta blockers’ impacts have
been carried out for years. Several trials showed that some
beta blockers have effects on end-systolic/diastolic volume
decreasing or ejection fraction improvement (Table 2),
which are the most convincing measures to assess remod-
eling [1].
In all the above-mentioned beta blockers, only biso-
prolol, metoprolol (succinate formula) and carvedilol were
approved by FDA for use in heart failure treatment. Biso-
prolol, a selective beta1 adrenergic receptor blocker, has
significant effects on reducing mortality of patients in New
York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV [145]. In
CIBIS prognostic improvement study, bisoprolol treatment
improves fractional shortening, decreased end-diastolic
pressure and end-diastolic diameter, which refer to an
impact on end-diastolic volume [146]. This effect has also
been demonstrated in another trial with long-term treat-
ment of bisoprolol [147]. Metoprolol, same as bisoprolol,
also a selective beta-1 adrenergic receptor blocker, shows a
significant improvement of ejection fraction in MDC [148],
MRIF-HF [149] and a recent trial of chronic degeneration
mitral regulation [150]. End-systolic pressure was observed
to increase in MDC or decrease less than placebo in MRIF-
HF; however, this phenomenon has not been observed in
the trial investigated by Ahmed et al. [150]. Even so,
metoprolol treatment does bring on ejection fraction
improvement in varying patients and gets better remodel-
ing protection effects than bisoprolol. Carvedilol, an
antagonist for beta-1/2 and alpha 1 adrenergic receptors,
has a strong impact on improving left ventricular function.
It improves ESV, EDV and EF in several trials [151–155].
Moreover, carvedilol also improves another measure to
assess remodeling, such as LV mass and LV geometry
[156]. Carvedilol shows an extraordinary property on
protection for preventing adverse remodeling.
These clinical trails provided us direct evidence for beta
blockers to treat cardiac remodeling based on monitoring
Heart Fail Rev
123
of physiological measurements. More importantly, there
are a lot of cellular mechanisms underlying these clinical
traits, and exploration of these mechanisms could enable us
to discover and develop better therapeutic agents targeting
beta-AR signaling pathways. Although mechanisms of beta
blockers for preventing remodeling are not fully
understood, based on our present knowledge, Ca2? han-
dling exhibits a significant role, and many other mecha-
nisms related to beta-adrenoceptor pathways are also
involved. Moreover, we also discuss the influence of
receptor affinity and subtype selectivity on the treatment of
remodeling.
Fig. 2 A network of cardiac remodeling. miRNAs and TFs involved
in cardiac remodeling were collected from literatures, and their
targets were identified from miRTarBase (release 3.5) [136] and
TFactS (version 2, sign-sensitive catalogue) [137]. We collected gene
sets of the five discussed pathways based on literature and confined
connections of miRNA-target gene and TF-target gene via the
collected gene set. Combined with protein–protein interaction of
HPRD database [138], a regulatory network was built based upon
regulatory interactions between miRNA and genes, and protein
interactions. The network contains 192 nodes and 438 edges
Heart Fail Rev
123
Ca2? handling
Ca2? handling has been reviewed in the beta-AR-mediated
pathways and shows close association with pathological
remodeling. Lots of beta blockers, such as carvedilol, meto-
prolol, atenolol and propranolol, have been shown to prevent
the development of cardiac remodeling in different experi-
ments. These drugs share a similar mechanism involved in the
regulation of Ca2? handling proteins and channels. In a canine
model, low-dose propranolol restores RyR conformational
change and prevents Ca2? leak from RyR, thus resulting in an
attenuation of intracellular Ca2? [157]. Beta-AR blockade
with carvedilol, metoprolol and atenolol improves Ca2?
release channel function via RyR in patients with heart failure
to induce reverse remodeling [158]. Carvedilol and meto-
prolol also induce improvement of SERCA expression to
increase uptake of intracellular Ca2? [159]. In a genetic model
characterized by sympathetic hyperactivity-induced HF
(a2A/a2C-ARKO mice), carvedilol and metoprolol lead to
comparable treatment effect in cardiac remodeling. However,
metoprolol preferentially improved cardiomyocyte Ca2?
transient, while carvedilol inhibits Ca2? overload-induced
augmentation of mitochondrial oxygen consumption and
keeps the balance of global myocardial redox [160].
Other mechanisms
In addition to Ca2? handling, a lot of mechanisms are pro-
posed based on experimental studies. Metoprolol selectively
decreases myocardial expression of Bcl-xs, reducing the
Bcl-xs/xl and Bcl-xs/Bcl-2 ratio, thereby inhibiting apopto-
sis and favoring cell survival [161]. Nebivolol induces a
reduction in oxidative stress by reducing myocardial
NADPH oxidase activity, promotion of nitric oxide bio-
availability by activation of eNOS and increased NO bio-
synthesis [162]. Propranolol prevents the upregulation of
MMPs, whereas MMP inhibition reduces cardiac remodel-
ing [77]. To note, these proteins, such as Bcl-2, NADPH
oxidase, eNOS and MMPs, have been reviewed in the study
to play pivotal roles in beta-adrenoceptor pathways that
mediate cardiac remodeling. Thus, it is very likely that beta-
AR antagonists block these pathways via inhibition of beta-
AR and then prevent cardiac remodeling. Moreover,
monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), matrix
metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their tissue inhibitors
(TIMPs) play a critical role in early phase of LV remodeling
following acute myocardial infarction and serve as early
markers. Carvedilol shows greater anti-remodeling activities
than metoprolol in a porcine ischemia/reperfusion model for
exerting much stronger effect on these markers [163]. This
may partially be responsible for higher treatment effect of
carvedilol than metoprolol in remodeling.
Affinity and receptor subtypes selectivity
Affinity reflects the binding capability of beta blockers to
beta-AR and largely determines the efficacy of beta
Table 1 Transcription factors, miRNAs and its target gene within
pathways
miRNAs related
with the pathway
Target gene
of miRNAs
in pathway
TF related
with the
pathway
Ca2?-calcineurin-NFAT/CaMKII-HDACs signaling
miR-1 CALM3, CALM2,
HDAC4
MEF2A, B, C,
D
Gs-AC-cAMP
signaling
miR-30a PPP3CA, ATP2A2 CREB1
NFKB1
NFATC2
Beta3-adrenergic signaling
miR-155 PDE3A SP1
PI3K signaling
miR-195 BCL2 CTNNB1
miR-20a BCL2 SP1
miR-17 BCL2 MYC
miR-181b BCL2 FOXO4
miR-21 BCL2 CREB1
miR-29c BCL2 FOXO3
miR-29b BCL2, MMP2 STAT3
miR-29a PI3KR1, BCL2 TP53
miR-149* AKT1 CEBPA
miR-126 PI3KR2 NFKB1
miR-34b* BCL2 FOXO1
miR-34a BCL2
MAPK signaling
miR-20a MAPK9, MAP3K12 CTNNB1
miR-17 MAPK9, MAP3K12 SP1
miR-24 MAPK14, TGFB1 MEF2D
miR-21 EGFR GATA4
miR-214 MAPK8, MAP2K3 FOXO1
miR-1 EGFR JUN
miR-29a TFGB3 MEF2A
miR-93 MAPK9 E2F1
miR-148a RPS6KA5 CREB1
miR-34a MAP2K1 STAT3
NFATC3
TP53
NFATC1
NFATC4
NFKB1
MEF2C
The asterisk following a name indicates a miRNA with lower expression
level relative to the other one derived from the opposite arm of a hairpin
Heart Fail Rev
123
blockers. Atenolol has been reported to be inferior to
metoprolol in improving LV function and preventing
ventricular remodeling in dogs with heart failure. EF
increase and ESV decrease are more significant in meto-
prolol-treated dogs than that of atenolol (EF 6.0 ± 0.86 vs.
0.8 ± 0.85 %, P \ 0.05; ESV -4.3 ± 0.81 vs. -
1 ± 0.52 ml, P \ 0.05) [164]. Carvedilol has been shown
to exert much stronger effect on inhibiting remodeling
from both experimental and clinical data. The result coin-
cides with the power of affinity of beta blockers (carvedi-
lol [ metoprolol [ atenolol, see Table 3). In addition, the
expression ratio of beta-1 AR versus beta-2 AR is 77:23 in
non-failing heart, while in the failing ventricle, beta-1 AR
is selectively downregulated and the ratio is 60:38 [165].
The relative content of beta-2 AR and beta-3 AR is
increased, thus facilitating drugs with higher selectivity of
beta-2 AR or beta-3 AR to exert favorable effects. The
affinity of metoprolol to beta-1 AR is little lower than
bisoprolol; however, as we have mentioned before, meto-
prolol gets better ejection fraction improvement compared
with bisoprolol. This may be explained by the higher
selectivity of beta-2 AR of metoprolol (see Table 3) [166].
In addition, carvedilol has been shown to be more effective
than metoprolol on attenuating ventricular remodeling after
heart failure, which may partially owing to higher binding
capacity of carvedilol to beta-3 AR in the failing ventric-
ular (see Table 3), thus contributing to inhibition of beta-3
AR expression [111].
Beta blockers and miRNAs
Few researches have revealed effects of beta blockers on
miRNAs in the process of cardiac remodeling; however,
some microarray studies have shown that beta blockers
altered miRNA expression profile and reversed expression
of some dysregulated miRNAs in this process [167, 168].
Moreover, Lu et al. [169] have explored the mechanism of
beta blockers on regulating the level of miRNA and proved
that propranolol produces beneficial effects via downreg-
ulation of miR-1, which contributes to ischemic ar-
rhythmogenesis. More interestingly, Ye et al. [170] have
recently compared the effects of nebivolol and atenolol in
salt-sensitive hypertensive rats and found that nebivolol
was more effective in attenuating cardiac remodeling than
atenolol, which was related to the unique effect of nebiv-
olol on miR-27a and miR-29a. Within the cardiac remod-
eling network, we can find that the targets of miR-27a and
miR-29a are FOXO1, BCL2, PIK3R1 and TGFB3 and they
located mainly in the beta-2 AR pathway (see Fig. 1).
Thus, it led us to reason that the effects of nebivolol might
be coming from its effects on beta-2 AR pathway.
Although nebivolol is universally acknowledged as a
highly selectively beta-1 adrenoceptor antagonist, it owns
some special pharmacological properties different from
other beta-1 adrenoceptor blockers. The clinically used
nebivolol is a racemate mixture of D- and L-enantiomers,
and the former has shown the ability to activate beta-2 AR
Table 2 Effect of beta blockers on end-systolic/diastolic volume and ejection fraction in trials (EDV/ESV/EF data contained trials only)
Investigator Year Beta
blocker
Placebo Drug Decreased
EDV
Decreased
ESV
Improved
LV EF
other
The CIBIS investigators [172] 1997 Bisoprolol 320 321 9(ESD) H(ESD) 9 LV FS increased
Beta blocker evaluation of
survival trial, investigators [173]
2001 Bucindolol 1,354 1,354 9 9 9
Colucci and colleagues [174] 1996 Carvedilol 134 232 H
Australia/New Zealand Heart
Failure Research Collaborative
Group [152]
1997 Carvedilol 207 208 H H H
Basu et al. [153] 1997 Carvedilol 72 72 H H H
Lowes et al. [155] 1999 Carvedilol 24 36 H LV mass and wall
thickness decrease,
geometry improves
Leonetti Luparini et al. [154] 1999 Carvedilol 20 20 H
Waagstein et al. [148] 1993 Metoprolol 189 194 H
MERIT-HF Study Group [149] 1999 Metoprolol 1,990 2,001 H
Ahmed et al. [150] 2012 Metoprolol 19 19 9 9 H
The SENIORS investigators [175] 2009 Nebivolol 1,058 1,053 9 H(ESD) H LV FS increased
ESV = end-systolic volume; EDV = end-diastolic volume; ESD = end-systolic volume; EDD = end-diastolic volume; LV = left
ventricular;9 = not significant result; H = significant result; blank means not mention; we consider ESD/EDD as alternative information of
ESV/EDV, but put it in brace
Heart Fail Rev
123
in a physiological model [171], thus providing a direct
evidence for nebivolol that can affect beta-2 AR pathway.
In addition, Ceron et al. [176] have just shown that this
agent could decrease vascular remodeling via attenuating
prooxidant and profibrotic mechanisms involving TGFband MMP2; this coincides with our aforementioned ana-
lysis of cardiac remodeling network. Taken together, these
efforts suggested that it is meaningful to explore the action
mechanism of drug and reasons for efficacy difference in a
systems regulatory network.
Conclusions
Cardiac remodeling is regulated by a very complicated net-
work of signaling molecules, genes, transcription factors and
miRNAs. Here, we reviewed five main pathways and its
regulatory network. Several beta-adrenoceptor signaling
pathways induced by beta activation are closely associated
with the cellular changes of remodeling. In general, these
activated pathways would induce adverse remodeling, while
some pathways, such as PI3K signaling and beta-3 signaling,
could be cardioprotective by promoting cell survival and
maintaining equilibrium of myocardial NO and ROS pro-
duction. Moreover, some molecular effectors in these path-
ways have shown the potential to be future therapeutic targets
for the treatment of cardiac remodeling. Meanwhile, beta
blockers, beta-adrenergic-receptor-targeted agents, show
outstanding benefits on remodeling. By studying the experi-
mental and clinical data, we summarize partial mechanisms
and the reason resulting in difference in treatment effects. In
summary, a comprehensive review of beta-AR signaling and
mechanisms of beta blocker in the treatment of remodeling
would help in disease therapy and drug development.
Acknowledgments This work was financially supported by the
National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, No.
2012CB518405) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (No.
81373893).
Conflict of interests The authors declare that they have no com-
peting interests.
References
1. Cohn JN, Ferrari R, Sharpe N (2000) Cardiac remodeling—
concepts and clinical implications: a consensus paper from an
international forum on cardiac remodeling. Behalf of an inter-
national forum on cardiac remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol
35:569–582
2. Vantrimpont P, Rouleau JL, Ciampi A, Harel F, de Champlain J,
Bichet D, Moye LA, Pfeffer M (1998) Two-year time course and
significance of neurohumoral activation in the Survival and Ven-
tricular Enlargement (SAVE) Study. Eur Heart J 19:1552–1563
3. Gajarsa JJ, Kloner RA (2011) Left ventricular remodeling in the
post-infarction heart: a review of cellular, molecular mecha-
nisms, and therapeutic modalities. Heart Fail Rev 16:13–21
4. Weisman HF, Bush DE, Mannisi JA, Bulkley BH (1985) Global
cardiac remodeling after acute myocardial infarction: a study in
the rat model. J Am Coll Cardiol 5:1355–1362
5. Anversa P, Olivetti G, Capasso JM (1991) Cellular basis of
ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. Am J Car-
diol 68:7D–16D
6. Bylund DB, Eikenberg DC, Hieble JP, Langer SZ, Lefkowitz
RJ, Minneman KP, Molinoff PB, Ruffolo RR Jr, Trendelenburg
U (1994) International union of pharmacology nomenclature of
adrenoceptors. Pharmacol Rev 46:121–136
7. Evans BA, Sato M, Sarwar M, Hutchinson DS, Summers RJ
(2010) Ligand-directed signalling at beta-adrenoceptors. Br J
Pharmacol 159:1022–1038
8. Alderman EL, Bourassa MG, Cohen LS, Davis KB, Kaiser GG,
Killip T, Mock MB, Pettinger M, Robertson TL (1990) Ten-year
follow-up of survival and myocardial infarction in the ran-
domized Coronary Artery Surgery Study. Circulation
82:1629–1646
9. Cleland JG, Freemantle N, Ball SG, Bonser RS, Camici P,
Chattopadhyay S, Dutka D, Eastaugh J, Hampton J, Large S,
Norell MS, Pennell DJ, Pepper J, Sanda S, Senior R, Smith D
(2003) The heart failure revascularisation trial (HEART):
rationale, design and methodology. Eur J Heart Fail 5:295–303
10. Asrih M, Mach F, Nencioni A, Dallegri F, Quercioli A,
Montecucco F (2013) Role of mitogen-activated protein kinase
pathways in multifactorial adverse cardiac remodeling associ-
ated with metabolic syndrome. Mediators Inflamm 2013:367245
11. Schaeffer HJ, Weber MJ (1999) Mitogen-activated protein
kinases: specific messages from ubiquitous messengers. Mol
Cell Biol 19:2435–2444
12. Muslin AJ (2008) MAPK signalling in cardiovascular health and
disease: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Clin Sci
115:203–218
13. Sabri A, Pak E, Alcott SA, Wilson BA, Steinberg SF (2000)
Coupling function of endogenous alpha(1)- and beta-adrenergic
receptors in mouse cardiomyocytes. Circ Res 86:1047–1053
Table 3 Affinity, selectivity of atenolol, metoprolol, bisoprolol and carvedilol [166]
Drug name LogKD values Selectivity ratios
b1 b2 b3 b1 versus b2 b1 versus b3
Atenolol -6.66 ± 0.05 -5.99 ± 0.14 -4.11 ± 0.07 4.7 354.8
Metoprolol -7.26 ± 0.07 -6.89 ± 0.09 -5.16 ± 0.12 2.3 125.9
Bisoprolol -7.83 ± 0.04 -6.70 ± 0.05 -5.67 ± 0.10 13.5 144.5
Carvedilol -8.75 ± 0.09 -9.40 ± 0.08 -8.30 ± 0.11 1/4.5 2.8
LogKD is used to evaluate the affinity of beta blocker to beta-ARs; the lower the value, the stronger the affinity
Heart Fail Rev
123
14. Zhang GX, Kimura S, Nishiyama A, Shokoji T, Rahman M, Yao
L, Nagai Y, Fujisawa Y, Miyatake A, Abe Y (2005) Cardiac
oxidative stress in acute and chronic isoproterenol-infused rats.
Cardiovasc Res 65:230–238
15. Peter PS, Brady JE, Yan L, Chen W, Engelhardt S, Wang Y,
Sadoshima J, Vatner SF, Vatner DE (2007) Inhibition of p38
alpha MAPK rescues cardiomyopathy induced by overexpressed
beta 2-adrenergic receptor, but not beta 1-adrenergic receptor.
J Clin Invest 117:1335–1343
16. Zheng M, Zhang SJ, Zhu WZ, Ziman B, Kobilka BK, Xiao RP
(2000) Beta 2-adrenergic receptor-induced p38 MAPK activation
is mediated by protein kinase A rather than by Gi or gbeta gamma
in adult mouse cardiomyocytes. J Biol Chem 275:40635–40640
17. Peterson KL (2002) Pressure overload hypertrophy and con-
gestive heart failure. Where is the ‘‘Achilles’ heel’’? J Am Coll
Cardiol 39:672–675
18. Rose BA, Force T, Wang Y (2010) Mitogen-activated protein
kinase signaling in the heart: angels versus demons in a heart-
breaking tale. Physiol Rev 90:1507–1546
19. Li T, Liu Z, Hu X, Ma K, Zhou C (2012) Involvement of ERK-
RSK cascade in phenylephrine-induced phosphorylation of
GATA4. Biochim Biophys Acta 1823:582–592
20. Busatto VC, Cunha V, Cicilini MA, Mill JG (1999) Differential
effects of isoproterenol on the activity of angiotensin-converting
enzyme in the rat heart and aorta. Braz J Med Biol Res 32:355–360
21. Noma T, Lemaire A, Naga Prasad SV, Barki-Harrington L,
Tilley DG, Chen J, Le Corvoisier P, Violin JD, Wei H, Lefko-
witz RJ, Rockman HA (2007) Beta-arrestin-mediated beta1-
adrenergic receptor transactivation of the EGFR confers car-
dioprotection. J Clin Invest 117:2445–2458
22. Wang Y, Su B, Sah VP, Brown JH, Han J, Chien KR (1998)
Cardiac hypertrophy induced by mitogen-activated protein
kinase kinase 7, a specific activator for c-Jun NH2-terminal
kinase in ventricular muscle cells. J Biol Chem 273:5423–5426
23. Bogoyevitch MA, Gillespie-Brown J, Ketterman AJ, Fuller SJ,
Ben-Levy R, Ashworth A, Marshall CJ, Sugden PH (1996)
Stimulation of the stress-activated mitogen-activated protein
kinase subfamilies in perfused heart. p38/RK mitogen-activated
protein kinases and c-Jun N-terminal kinases are activated by
ischemia/reperfusion. Circ Res 79:162–173
24. Liang Q, Molkentin JD (2003) Redefining the roles of p38 and JNK
signaling in cardiac hypertrophy: dichotomy between cultured
myocytes and animal models. J Mol Cell Cardiol 35:1385–1394
25. Petrich BG, Eloff BC, Lerner DL, Kovacs A, Saffitz JE, Ro-
senbaum DS, Wang Y (2004) Targeted activation of c-Jun
N-terminal kinase in vivo induces restrictive cardiomyopathy
and conduction defects. J Biol Chem 279:15330–15338
26. Choukroun G, Hajjar R, Kyriakis JM, Bonventre JV, Rosen-
zweig A, Force T (1998) Role of the stress-activated protein
kinases in endothelin-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.
J Clin Invest 102:1311–1320
27. Liao P, Georgakopoulos D, Kovacs A, Zheng M, Lerner D, Pu H,
Saffitz J, Chien K, Xiao RP, Kass DA, Wang Y (2001) The in vivo
role of p38 MAP kinases in cardiac remodeling and restrictive
cardiomyopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:12283–12288
28. Bisognano JD, Weinberger HD, Bohlmeyer TJ, Pende A, Ray-
nolds MV, Sastravaha A, Roden R, Asano K, Blaxall BC, Wu SC,
Communal C, Singh K, Colucci W, Bristow MR, Port DJ (2000)
Myocardial-directed overexpression of the human beta(1)-
adrenergic receptor in transgenic mice. J Mol Cell Cardiol
32:817–830
29. Engelhardt S, Hein L, Wiesmann F, Lohse MJ (1999) Progres-
sive hypertrophy and heart failure in beta1-adrenergic receptor
transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:7059–7064
30. Gaudin C, Ishikawa Y, Wight DC, Mahdavi V, Nadal-Ginard B,
Wagner TE, Vatner DE, Homcy CJ (1995) Overexpression of
Gs alpha protein in the hearts of transgenic mice. J Clin Invest
95:1676–1683
31. Antos CL, Frey N, Marx SO, Reiken S, Gaburjakova M, Rich-
ardson JA, Marks AR, Olson EN (2001) Dilated cardiomyopa-
thy and sudden death resulting from constitutive activation of
protein kinase a. Circ Res 89:997–1004
32. Lewin G, Matus M, Basu A, Frebel K, Rohsbach SP, Safronenko A,
Seidl MD, Stumpel F, Buchwalow I, Konig S, Engelhardt S, Lohse
MJ, Schmitz W, Muller FU (2009) Critical role of transcription
factor cyclic AMP response element modulator in beta1-adreno-
ceptor-mediated cardiac dysfunction. Circulation 119:79–88
33. Watson PA, Reusch JE, McCune SA, Leinwand LA, Luckey
SW, Konhilas JP, Brown DA, Chicco AJ, Sparagna GC, Long
CS, Moore RL (2007) Restoration of CREB function is linked to
completion and stabilization of adaptive cardiac hypertrophy in
response to exercise. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
293:H246–H259
34. Xiang Y, Kobilka BK (2003) Myocyte adrenoceptor signaling
pathways. Science 300:1530–1532
35. El-Armouche A, Eschenhagen T (2009) Beta-adrenergic stim-
ulation and myocardial function in the failing heart. Heart Fail
Rev 14:225–241
36. El-Armouche A, Rau T, Zolk O, Ditz D, Pamminger T, Zim-
mermann WH, Jackel E, Harding SE, Boknik P, Neumann J,
Eschenhagen T (2003) Evidence for protein phosphatase
inhibitor-1 playing an amplifier role in beta-adrenergic signaling
in cardiac myocytes. FASEB J 17:437–439
37. Carr AN, Schmidt AG, Suzuki Y, del Monte F, Sato Y, Lanner
C, Breeden K, Jing SL, Allen PB, Greengard P, Yatani A, Hoit
BD, Grupp IL, Hajjar RJ, DePaoli-Roach AA, Kranias EG
(2002) Type 1 phosphatase, a negative regulator of cardiac
function. Mol Cell Biol 22:4124–4135
38. Neumann J, Gupta RC, Schmitz W, Scholz H, Nairn AC, Wa-
tanabe AM (1991) Evidence for isoproterenol-induced phos-
phorylation of phosphatase inhibitor-1 in the intact heart. Circ
Res 69:1450–1457
39. Mulkey RM, Endo S, Shenolikar S, Malenka RC (1994)
Involvement of a calcineurin/inhibitor-1 phosphatase cascade in
hippocampal long-term depression. Nature 369:486–488
40. El-Armouche A, Bednorz A, Pamminger T, Ditz D, Didie M,
Dobrev D, Eschenhagen T (2006) Role of calcineurin and protein
phosphatase-2A in the regulation of phosphatase inhibitor-1 in
cardiac myocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 346:700–706
41. Rehmann H, Schwede F, Doskeland SO, Wittinghofer A, Bos JL
(2003) Ligand-mediated activation of the cAMP-responsive guanine
nucleotide exchange factor Epac. J Biol Chem 278:38548–38556
42. Morel E, Marcantoni A, Gastineau M, Birkedal R, Rochais F,
Garnier A, Lompre AM, Vandecasteele G, Lezoualc’h F (2005)
cAMP-binding protein Epac induces cardiomyocyte hypertro-
phy. Circ Res 97:1296–1304
43. Lezoualc’h F, Metrich M, Hmitou I, Duquesnes N, Morel E
(2008) Small GTP-binding proteins and their regulators in car-
diac hypertrophy. J Mol Cell Cardiol 44:623–632
44. Bos JL (2006) Epac proteins: multi-purpose cAMP targets.
Trends Biochem Sci 31:680–686
45. Fu Y, Xiao H, Zhang Y (2012) Beta-adrenoceptor signaling
pathways mediate cardiac pathological remodeling. Front Biosci
4:1625–1637
46. Berthouze-Duquesnes M, Lucas A, Sauliere A, Sin YY, Laurent
AC, Gales C, Baillie G, Lezoualc’h F (2013) Specific interac-tions between Epac1, beta-arrestin2 and PDE4D5 regulate beta-
adrenergic receptor subtype differential effects on cardiac
hypertrophic signaling. Cell Signal 25:970–980
47. Metrich M, Lucas A, Gastineau M, Samuel JL, Heymes C, Morel
E, Lezoualc’h F (2008) Epac mediates beta-adrenergic receptor-
induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Circ Res 102:959–965
Heart Fail Rev
123
48. Metrich M, Laurent AC, Breckler M, Duquesnes N, Hmitou I,
Courillau D, Blondeau JP, Crozatier B, Lezoualc’h F, Morel E
(2010) Epac activation induces histone deacetylase nuclear
export via a Ras-dependent signalling pathway. Cell Signal
22:1459–1468
49. Chiang CS, Huang CH, Chieng H, Chang YT, Chang D, Chen
JJ, Chen YC, Chen YH, Shin HS, Campbell KP, Chen CC
(2009) The Ca(v)3.2 T-type Ca(2 ?) channel is required for
pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy in mice. Circ
Res 104:522–530
50. Onohara N, Nishida M, Inoue R, Kobayashi H, Sumimoto H,
Sato Y, Mori Y, Nagao T, Kurose H (2006) TRPC3 and TRPC6
are essential for angiotensin II-induced cardiac hypertrophy.
EMBO J 25:5305–5316
51. Kuwahara K, Wang Y, McAnally J, Richardson JA, Bassel-
Duby R, Hill JA, Olson EN (2006) TRPC6 fulfills a calcineurin
signaling circuit during pathologic cardiac remodeling. J Clin
Invest 116:3114–3126
52. Tandan S, Wang Y, Wang TT, Jiang N, Hall DD, Hell JW, Luo X,
Rothermel BA, Hill JA (2009) Physical and functional interaction
between calcineurin and the cardiac L-type Ca2 ? channel. Circ
Res 105:51–60
53. Semsarian C, Ahmad I, Giewat M, Georgakopoulos D, Schmitt
JP, McConnell BK, Reiken S, Mende U, Marks AR, Kass DA,
Seidman CE, Seidman JG (2002) The L-type calcium channel
inhibitor diltiazem prevents cardiomyopathy in a mouse model.
J Clin Invest 109:1013–1020
54. Liao Y, Asakura M, Takashima S, Ogai A, Asano Y, Asanuma
H, Minamino T, Tomoike H, Hori M, Kitakaze M (2005)
Benidipine, a long-acting calcium channel blocker, inhibits
cardiac remodeling in pressure-overloaded mice. Cardiovasc
Res 65:879–888
55. Chen X, Nakayama H, Zhang X, Ai X, Harris DM, Tang M,
Zhang H, Szeto C, Stockbower K, Berretta RM, Eckhart AD,
Koch WJ, Molkentin JD, Houser SR (2011) Calcium influx
through Cav1.2 is a proximal signal for pathological cardio-
myocyte hypertrophy. J Mol Cell Cardiol 50:460–470
56. Gao H, Wang F, Wang W, Makarewich CA, Zhang H, Kubo H,
Berretta RM, Barr LA, Molkentin JD, Houser SR (2012)
Ca(2 ?) influx through L-type Ca(2 ?) channels and transient
receptor potential channels activates pathological hypertrophy
signaling. J Mol Cell Cardiol 53:657–667
57. Molkentin JD, Lu JR, Antos CL, Markham B, Richardson J,
Robbins J, Grant SR, Olson EN (1998) A calcineurin-dependent
transcriptional pathway for cardiac hypertrophy. Cell
93:215–228
58. Zhang CL, McKinsey TA, Chang S, Antos CL, Hill JA, Olson
EN (2002) Class II histone deacetylases act as signal-responsive
repressors of cardiac hypertrophy. Cell 110:479–488
59. Backs J, Backs T, Neef S, Kreusser MM, Lehmann LH, Patrick
DM, Grueter CE, Qi X, Richardson JA, Hill JA, Katus HA,
Bassel-Duby R, Maier LS, Olson EN (2009) The delta isoform
of CaM kinase II is required for pathological cardiac hypertro-
phy and remodeling after pressure overload. Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA 106:2342–2347
60. Wright SC, Schellenberger U, Ji L, Wang H, Larrick JW (1997)
Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II mediates signal trans-
duction in apoptosis. FASEB J 11:843–849
61. Ishitani T, Kishida S, Hyodo-Miura J, Ueno N, Yasuda J,
Waterman M, Shibuya H, Moon RT, Ninomiya-Tsuji J, Mat-
sumoto K (2003) The TAK1-NLK mitogen-activated protein
kinase cascade functions in the Wnt-5a/Ca(2 ?) pathway to
antagonize Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Mol Cell Biol
23:131–139
62. Takeda K, Matsuzawa A, Nishitoh H, Tobiume K, Kishida S,
Ninomiya-Tsuji J, Matsumoto K, Ichijo H (2004) Involvement
of ASK1 in Ca2 ? -induced p38 MAP kinase activation. EMBO
Rep 5:161–166
63. Chang HY, Nishitoh H, Yang X, Ichijo H, Baltimore D (1998)
Activation of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) by
the adapter protein Daxx. Science 281:1860–1863
64. Zhu WZ, Wang SQ, Chakir K, Yang D, Zhang T, Brown JH,
Devic E, Kobilka BK, Cheng H, Xiao RP (2003) Linkage of
beta1-adrenergic stimulation to apoptotic heart cell death
through protein kinase A-independent activation of Ca2 ?/cal-
modulin kinase II. J Clin Invest 111:617–625
65. Zhu W, Woo AY, Yang D, Cheng H, Crow MT, Xiao RP (2007)
Activation of CaMKIIdeltaC is a common intermediate of
diverse death stimuli-induced heart muscle cell apoptosis. J Biol
Chem 282:10833–10839
66. Cantley LC (2002) The phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway.
Science 296:1655–1657
67. Morisco C, Zebrowski D, Condorelli G, Tsichlis P, Vatner SF,
Sadoshima J (2000) The Akt-glycogen synthase kinase 3beta
pathway regulates transcription of atrial natriuretic factor induced
by beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation in cardiac myocytes.
J Biol Chem 275:14466–14475
68. Schluter KD, Goldberg Y, Taimor G, Schafer M, Piper HM
(1998) Role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation in the
hypertrophic growth of adult ventricular cardiomyocytes. Car-
diovasc Res 40:174–181
69. Jo SH, Leblais V, Wang PH, Crow MT, Xiao RP (2002)
Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase functionally compartmentalizes
the concurrent G(s) signaling during beta2-adrenergic stimula-
tion. Circ Res 91:46–53
70. Leblais V, Jo SH, Chakir K, Maltsev V, Zheng M, Crow MT, Wang
W, Lakatta EG, Xiao RP (2004) Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
offsets cAMP-mediated positive inotropic effect via inhibiting
Ca2 ? influx in cardiomyocytes. Circ Res 95:1183–1190
71. Zhu X, Wang L, Liu R, Flutter B, Li S, Ding J, Tao H, Liu C,Sun M, Gao B (2010) COMBODY: one-domain antibody mul-
timer with improved avidity. Immunol Cell Biol 88:667–675
72. Crackower MA, Oudit GY, Kozieradzki I, Sarao R, Sun H,
Sasaki T, Hirsch E, Suzuki A, Shioi T, Irie-Sasaki J, Sah R,
Cheng HY, Rybin VO, Lembo G, Fratta L, Oliveira-dos-Santos
AJ, Benovic JL, Kahn CR, Izumo S, Steinberg SF, Wymann
MP, Backx PH, Penninger JM (2002) Regulation of myocardial
contractility and cell size by distinct PI3K-PTEN signaling
pathways. Cell 110:737–749
73. McMullen JR, Shioi T, Zhang L, Tarnavski O, Sherwood MC,
Kang PM, Izumo S (2003) Phosphoinositide 3-kinase(p110al-
pha) plays a critical role for the induction of physiological, but
not pathological, cardiac hypertrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
100:12355–12360
74. Patrucco E, Notte A, Barberis L, Selvetella G, Maffei A,
Brancaccio M, Marengo S, Russo G, Azzolino O, Rybalkin SD,
Silengo L, Altruda F, Wetzker R, Wymann MP, Lembo G,
Hirsch E (2004) PI3Kgamma modulates the cardiac response to
chronic pressure overload by distinct kinase-dependent and -
independent effects. Cell 118:375–387
75. Naga Prasad SV, Esposito G, Mao L, Koch WJ, Rockman HA
(2000) Gbetagamma-dependent phosphoinositide 3-kinase acti-
vation in hearts with in vivo pressure overload hypertrophy.
J Biol Chem 275:4693–4698
76. Oudit GY, Crackower MA, Eriksson U, Sarao R, Kozieradzki I,
Sasaki T, Irie-Sasaki J, Gidrewicz D, Rybin VO, Wada T,
Steinberg SF, Backx PH, Penninger JM (2003) Phosphoinositide
3-kinase gamma-deficient mice are protected from isoprotere-
nol-induced heart failure. Circulation 108:2147–2152
77. Guo D, Kassiri Z, Basu R, Chow FL, Kandalam V, Damilano F,
Liang W, Izumo S, Hirsch E, Penninger JM, Backx PH, Oudit
GY (2010) Loss of PI3Kgamma enhances cAMP-dependent
Heart Fail Rev
123
MMP remodeling of the myocardial N-cadherin adhesion
complexes and extracellular matrix in response to early bio-
mechanical stress. Circ Res 107:1275–1289
78. Sands WA, Palmer TM (2008) Regulating gene transcription in
response to cyclic AMP elevation. Cell Signal 20:460–466
79. Henderson BC, Sen U, Reynolds C, Moshal KS, Ovechkin A,
Tyagi N, Kartha GK, Rodriguez WE, Tyagi SC (2007) Reversal
of systemic hypertension-associated cardiac remodeling in
chronic pressure overload myocardium by ciglitazone. Int J Biol
Sci 3:385–392
80. Rizzi E, Castro MM, Prado CM, Silva CA, Fazan R Jr, Rossi
MA, Tanus-Santos JE, Gerlach RF (2010) Matrix metallopro-
teinase inhibition improves cardiac dysfunction and remodeling
in 2-kidney, 1-clip hypertension. J Card Fail 16:599–608
81. Matsusaka H, Ide T, Matsushima S, Ikeuchi M, Kubota T,
Sunagawa K, Kinugawa S, Tsutsui H (2006) Targeted deletion
of matrix metalloproteinase 2 ameliorates myocardial remodel-
ing in mice with chronic pressure overload. Hypertension
47:711–717
82. Lacchini R, Jacob-Ferreira AL, Luizon MR, Gasparini S,
Ferreira-Sae MC, Schreiber R, Nadruz W Jr, Tanus-Santos JE
(2012) Common matrix metalloproteinase 2 gene haplotypes
may modulate left ventricular remodelling in hypertensive
patients. J Hum Hypertens 26:171–177
83. Chesley A, Lundberg MS, Asai T, Xiao RP, Ohtani S, Lakatta
EG, Crow MT (2000) The beta(2)-adrenergic receptor delivers
an antiapoptotic signal to cardiac myocytes through G(i)-
dependent coupling to phosphatidylinositol 30-kinase. Circ Res
87:1172–1179
84. Zhu W, Zeng X, Zheng M, Xiao RP (2005) The enigma of
beta2-adrenergic receptor Gi signaling in the heart: the good, the
bad, and the ugly. Circ Res 97:507–509
85. Yano N, Ianus V, Zhao TC, Tseng A, Padbury JF, Tseng YT
(2007) A novel signaling pathway for beta-adrenergic receptor-
mediated activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase in H9c2
cardiomyocytes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 293:H385–
H393
86. Zhang W, Yano N, Deng M, Mao Q, Shaw SK, Tseng YT
(2011) Beta-Adrenergic receptor-PI3K signaling crosstalk in
mouse heart: elucidation of immediate downstream signaling
cascades. PLoS ONE 6:e26581
87. Ning Q, Jian XD, Liu J, Lin DW, Liu F, Zhang ZC, Zhao B
(2010) Experimental therapy of penehyclidine hydrochloride on
paraquat-induced acute lung injury. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei
Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi 28:667–670
88. Dupont Jensen J, Laenkholm AV, Knoop A, Ewertz M, Bandaru
R, Liu W, Hackl W, Barrett JC, Gardner H (2011) PIK3CA
mutations may be discordant between primary and correspond-
ing metastatic disease in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res
17:667–677
89. Datta SR, Dudek H, Tao X, Masters S, Fu H, Gotoh Y,
Greenberg ME (1997) Akt phosphorylation of BAD couples
survival signals to the cell-intrinsic death machinery. Cell
91:231–241
90. del Peso L, Gonzalez-Garcia M, Page C, Herrera R, Nunez G
(1997) Interleukin-3-induced phosphorylation of BAD through
the protein kinase Akt. Science 278:687–689
91. Brunet A, Datta SR, Greenberg ME (2001) Transcription-
dependent and -independent control of neuronal survival by the
PI3K–Akt signaling pathway. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11:297–305
92. Sugimoto M, Nakayama M, Goto TM, Amano M, Komori K,
Kaibuchi K (2007) Rho-kinase phosphorylates eNOS at threo-
nine 495 in endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun
361:462–467
93. Woodgett JR (1990) Molecular cloning and expression of gly-
cogen synthase kinase-3/factor A. EMBO J 9:2431–2438
94. Morisco C, Seta K, Hardt SE, Lee Y, Vatner SF, Sadoshima J
(2001) Glycogen synthase kinase 3beta regulates GATA4 in
cardiac myocytes. J Biol Chem 276:28586–28597
95. Haq S, Choukroun G, Kang ZB, Ranu H, Matsui T, Rosenzweig
A, Molkentin JD, Alessandrini A, Woodgett J, Hajjar R,
Michael A, Force T (2000) Glycogen synthase kinase-3beta is a
negative regulator of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. J Cell Biol
151:117–130
96. Webb IG, Nishino Y, Clark JE, Murdoch C, Walker SJ, Ma-
kowski MR, Botnar RM, Redwood SR, Shah AM, Marber MS
(2010) Constitutive glycogen synthase kinase-3alpha/beta
activity protects against chronic beta-adrenergic remodelling of
the heart. Cardiovasc Res 87:494–503
97. Lal H, Zhou J, Ahmad F, Zaka R, Vagnozzi RJ, Decaul M,
Woodgett J, Gao E, Force T (2012) Glycogen synthase kinase-
3alpha limits ischemic injury, cardiac rupture, post-myocardial
infarction remodeling and death. Circulation 125:65–75
98. Zhou J, Lal H, Chen X, Shang X, Song J, Li Y, Kerkela R,
Doble BW, MacAulay K, DeCaul M, Koch WJ, Farber J,
Woodgett J, Gao E, Force T (2010) GSK-3alpha directly regu-
lates beta-adrenergic signaling and the response of the heart to
hemodynamic stress in mice. J Clin Invest 120:2280–2291
99. Zhai P, Gao S, Holle E, Yu X, Yatani A, Wagner T, Sadoshima J
(2007) Glycogen synthase kinase-3alpha reduces cardiac growth
and pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy by inhibition
of extracellular signal-regulated kinases. J Biol Chem
282:33181–33191
100. Huang J, Manning BD (2008) The TSC1–TSC2 complex: a
molecular switchboard controlling cell growth. Biochem J
412:179–190
101. Matsuda T, Zhai P, Maejima Y, Hong C, Gao S, Tian B, Goto K,
Takagi H, Tamamori-Adachi M, Kitajima S, Sadoshima J
(2008) Distinct roles of GSK-3alpha and GSK-3beta phos-
phorylation in the heart under pressure overload. Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA 105:20900–20905
102. Skurk C, Izumiya Y, Maatz H, Razeghi P, Shiojima I, Sandri M,
Sato K, Zeng L, Schiekofer S, Pimentel D, Lecker S, Taegt-
meyer H, Goldberg AL, Walsh K (2005) The FOXO3a tran-
scription factor regulates cardiac myocyte size downstream of
AKT signaling. J Biol Chem 280:20814–20823
103. Ni YG, Berenji K, Wang N, Oh M, Sachan N, Dey A, Cheng J,
Lu G, Morris DJ, Castrillon DH, Gerard RD, Rothermel BA,
Hill JA (2006) Foxo transcription factors blunt cardiac hyper-
trophy by inhibiting calcineurin signaling. Circulation
114:1159–1168
104. Fang CX, Dong F, Thomas DP, Ma H, He L, Ren J (2008)
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in high-fat diet-induced obesity:
role of suppression of forkhead transcription factor and atrophy
gene transcription. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 295:H1206–
H1215
105. Tremblay ML, Giguere V (2008) Phosphatases at the heart of
FoxO metabolic control. Cell Metab 7:101–103
106. Ferdous A, Battiprolu PK, Ni YG, Rothermel BA, Hill JA
(2010) FoxO, autophagy, and cardiac remodeling. J Cardiovasc
Transl Res 3:355–364
107. Emorine LJ, Marullo S, Briend-Sutren MM, Patey G, Tate K,
Delavier-Klutchko C, Strosberg AD (1989) Molecular charac-
terization of the human beta 3-adrenergic receptor. Science
245:1118–1121
108. Simard PM, Atgie C, Mauriege P, D’Allaire F, Bukowiecki LJ
(1994) Comparison of the lipolytic effects of norepinephrine and
BRL 37344 in rat brown and white adipocytes. Obes Res
2:424–431
109. Hutchinson DS, Chernogubova E, Dallner OS, Cannon B,
Bengtsson T (2005) Beta-adrenoceptors, but not alpha-adreno-
ceptors, stimulate AMP-activated protein kinase in brown
Heart Fail Rev
123
adipocytes independently of uncoupling protein-1. Diabetologia
48:2386–2395
110. Cheng HJ, Zhang ZS, Onishi K, Ukai T, Sane DC, Cheng CP
(2001) Upregulation of functional beta(3)-adrenergic receptor in
the failing canine myocardium. Circ Res 89:599–606
111. Zhao Q, Wu TG, Jiang ZF, Chen GW, Lin Y, Wang LX (2007)
Effect of beta-blockers on beta3-adrenoceptor expression in
chronic heart failure. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 21:85–90
112. Moens AL, Leyton-Mange JS, Niu X, Yang R, Cingolani O,
Arkenbout EK, Champion HC, Bedja D, Gabrielson KL, Chen J,
Xia Y, Hale AB, Channon KM, Halushka MK, Barker N, Wuyts
FL, Kaminski PM, Wolin MS, Kass DA, Barouch LA (2009)
Adverse ventricular remodeling and exacerbated NOS uncou-
pling from pressure-overload in mice lacking the beta3-adre-
noreceptor. J Mol Cell Cardiol 47:576–585
113. Niu X, Watts VL, Cingolani OH, Sivakumaran V, Leyton-Mange
JS, Ellis CL, Miller KL, Vandegaer K, Bedja D, Gabrielson KL,
Paolocci N, Kass DA, Barouch LA (2012) Cardioprotective effect
of beta-3 adrenergic receptor agonism: role of neuronal nitric
oxide synthase. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:1979–1987
114. Gauthier C, Tavernier G, Charpentier F, Langin D, Le Marec H
(1996) Functional beta3-adrenoceptor in the human heart. J Clin
Invest 98:556–562
115. Gauthier C, Leblais V, Kobzik L, Trochu JN, Khandoudi N, Bril
A, Balligand JL, Le Marec H (1998) The negative inotropic
effect of beta3-adrenoceptor stimulation is mediated by activa-
tion of a nitric oxide synthase pathway in human ventricle.
J Clin Invest 102:1377–1384
116. Varghese P, Harrison RW, Lofthouse RA, Georgakopoulos D,
Berkowitz DE, Hare JM (2000) Beta(3)-adrenoceptor deficiency
blocks nitric oxide-dependent inhibition of myocardial con-
tractility. J Clin Invest 106:697–703
117. Ignarro LJ (1999) Nitric oxide: a unique endogenous signaling
molecule in vascular biology. Biosci Rep 19:51–71
118. Francis SH, Busch JL, Corbin JD, Sibley D (2010) cGMP-
dependent protein kinases and cGMP phosphodiesterases in
nitric oxide and cGMP action. Pharmacol Rev 62:525–563
119. Hofmann F (2005) The biology of cyclic GMP-dependent pro-
tein kinases. J Biol Chem 280:1–4
120. Hofmann F, Bernhard D, Lukowski R, Weinmeister P (2009)
cGMP regulated protein kinases (cGK). Handb Exp Pharmacol
191:137–162
121. Wegener JW, Nawrath H, Wolfsgruber W, Kuhbandner S,
Werner C, Hofmann F, Feil R (2002) cGMP-dependent protein
kinase I mediates the negative inotropic effect of cGMP in the
murine myocardium. Circ Res 90:18–20
122. Godecke A, Heinicke T, Kamkin A, Kiseleva I, Strasser RH,
Decking UK, Stumpe T, Isenberg G, Schrader J (2001) Inotropic
response to beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation and anti-
adrenergic effect of ACh in endothelial NO synthase-deficient
mouse hearts. J Physiol 532:195–204
123. Schroder F, Klein G, Fiedler B, Bastein M, Schnasse N, Hillmer
A, Ames S, Gambaryan S, Drexler H, Walter U, Lohmann SM,
Wollert KC (2003) Single L-type Ca(2 ?) channel regulation by
cGMP-dependent protein kinase type I in adult cardiomyocytes
from PKG I transgenic mice. Cardiovasc Res 60:268–277
124. Brixius K, Bloch W, Pott C, Napp A, Krahwinkel A, Ziskoven
C, Koriller M, Mehlhorn U, Hescheler J, Fleischmann B,
Schwinger RH (2004) Mechanisms of beta 3-adrenoceptor-
induced eNOS activation in right atrial and left ventricular
human myocardium. Br J Pharmacol 143:1014–1022
125. Brixius K, Bloch W, Ziskoven C, Bolck B, Napp A, Pott C,
Steinritz D, Jiminez M, Addicks K, Giacobino JP, Schwinger
RH (2006) Beta3-adrenergic eNOS stimulation in left ventric-
ular murine myocardium. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 84:1051–
1060
126. Napp A, Brixius K, Pott C, Ziskoven C, Boelck B, Mehlhorn U,
Schwinger RH, Bloch W (2009) Effects of the beta3-adrenergic
agonist BRL 37344 on endothelial nitric oxide synthase phos-
phorylation and force of contraction in human failing myocar-
dium. J Card Fail 15:57–67
127. Bauer PM, Fulton D, Boo YC, Sorescu GP, Kemp BE, Jo H,
Sessa WC (2003) Compensatory phosphorylation and protein-
protein interactions revealed by loss of function and gain of
function mutants of multiple serine phosphorylation sites in
endothelial nitric-oxide synthase. J Biol Chem 278:14841–
14849
128. Fleming I, Busse R (2003) Molecular mechanisms involved in
the regulation of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Am J
Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 284:R1–R12
129. Kolluru GK, Siamwala JH, Chatterjee S (2010) eNOS phos-
phorylation in health and disease. Biochimie 92:1186–1198
130. Yin F, Wang YY, Du JH, Li C, Lu ZZ, Han C, Zhang YY (2006)
Noncanonical cAMP pathway and p38 MAPK mediate beta2-
adrenergic receptor-induced IL-6 production in neonatal mouse
cardiac fibroblasts. J Mol Cell Cardiol 40:384–393
131. Seeland U, Schaffer A, Selejan S, Hohl M, Reil JC, Muller P,
Rosenkranz S, Bohm M (2009) Effects of AT1- and beta-
adrenergic receptor antagonists on TGF-beta1-induced fibrosis
in transgenic mice. Eur J Clin Invest 39:851–859
132. Dostal DE (2000) The cardiac renin-angiotensin system: novel
signaling mechanisms related to cardiac growth and function.
Regul Pept 91:1–11
133. Leenen FH, White R, Yuan B (2001) Isoproterenol-induced cardiac
hypertrophy: role of circulatory versus cardiac renin-angiotensin
system. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281:H2410–H2416
134. Matsui Y, Jia N, Okamoto H, Kon S, Onozuka H, Akino M, Liu
L, Morimoto J, Rittling SR, Denhardt D, Kitabatake A, Uede T
(2004) Role of osteopontin in cardiac fibrosis and remodeling in
angiotensin II-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Hypertension
43:1195–1201
135. Haghikia A, Stapel B, Hoch M, Hilfiker-Kleiner D (2011)
STAT3 and cardiac remodeling. Heart Fail Rev 16:35–47
136. Dobaczewski M, Chen W, Frangogiannis NG (2011) Trans-
forming growth factor (TGF)-beta signaling in cardiac remod-
eling. J Mol Cell Cardiol 51:600–606
137. Hsu SD, Lin FM, Wu WY, Liang C, Huang WC, Chan WL, Tsai
WT, Chen GZ, Lee CJ, Chiu CM, Chien CH, Wu MC, Huang
CY, Tsou AP, Huang HD (2011) miRTarBase: a database
curates experimentally validated microRNA-target interactions.
Nucleic Acids Res 39:D163–D169
138. Essaghir A, Toffalini F, Knoops L, Kallin A, van Helden J,
Demoulin JB (2010) Transcription factor regulation can be
accurately predicted from the presence of target gene signatures
in microarray gene expression data. Nucleic Acids Res 38:e120
139. Keshava Prasad TS, Goel R, Kandasamy K, Keerthikumar S,
Kumar S, Mathivanan S, Telikicherla D, Raju R, Shafreen B,
Venugopal A, Balakrishnan L, Marimuthu A, Banerjee S, So-
manathan DS, Sebastian A, Rani S, Ray S, Harrys Kishore CJ,
Kanth S, Ahmed M, Kashyap MK, Mohmood R, Ramachandra
YL, Krishna V, Rahiman BA, Mohan S, Ranganathan P, Ram-
abadran S, Chaerkady R, Pandey A (2009) Human protein ref-
erence database-2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D767–D772
140. Sun W, Julie Li YS, Huang HD, Shyy JY, Chien S (2010)
microRNA: a master regulator of cellular processes for bioen-
gineering systems. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 12:1–27
141. Liu LZ, Li C, Chen Q, Jing Y, Carpenter R, Jiang Y, Kung HF,
Lai L, Jiang BH (2011) MiR-21 induced angiogenesis through
AKT and ERK activation and HIF-1alpha expression. PLoS
ONE 6:e19139
142. Lal A, Thomas MP, Altschuler G, Navarro F, O’Day E, Li XL,
Concepcion C, Han YC, Thiery J, Rajani DK, Deutsch A,
Heart Fail Rev
123
Hofmann O, Ventura A, Hide W, Lieberman J (2011) Capture of
microRNA-bound mRNAs identifies the tumor suppressor miR-
34a as a regulator of growth factor signaling. PLoS Genet
7:e1002363
143. Frigerio M, Roubina E (2005) Drugs for left ventricular
remodeling in heart failure. Am J Cardiol 96:10L–18L
144. Foody JM, Farrell MH, Krumholz HM (2002) Beta-Blocker
therapy in heart failure: scientific review. JAMA 287:883–889
145. CIBIS-II Investigators and Committees (1999) The cardiac
insufficiency bisoprolol study II (CIBIS-II): a randomised trial.
Lancet 353:9–13
146. Lechat P, Escolano S, Golmard JL, Lardoux H, Witchitz S,
Henneman JA, Maisch B, Hetzel M, Jaillon P, Boissel JP, Mallet
A (1997) Prognostic value of bisoprolol-induced hemodynamic
effects in heart failure during the Cardiac Insufficiency BIso-
prolol Study (CIBIS). Circulation 96:2197–2205
147. Yoshitomi Y, Kojima S, Yano M, Sugi T, Matsumoto Y, Ku-
ramochi M (2000) Long-term effects of bisoprolol compared
with imidapril on left ventricular remodeling after reperfusion in
acute myocardial infarction: an angiographic study in patients
with maintained vessel patency. Am Heart J 140:E27
148. Waagstein F, Bristow MR, Swedberg K, Camerini F, Fowler
MB, Silver MA, Gilbert EM, Johnson MR, Goss FG, Hjalmar-
son A (1993) Beneficial effects of metoprolol in idiopathic
dilated cardiomyopathy. Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy
(MDC) Trial Study Group. Lancet 342:1441–1446
149. MERIT-HF Study Group (1999) Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in
chronic heart failure: metoprolol CR/XL randomised interven-
tion trial in congestive heart failure (MERIT-HF). Lancet
353:2001–2007
150. Ahmed MI, Aban I, Lloyd SG, Gupta H, Howard G, Inusah S,
Peri K, Robinson J, Smith P, McGiffin DC, Schiros CG, Denney
T Jr, Dell’Italia LJ (2012) A randomized controlled phase IIb
trial of beta(1)-receptor blockade for chronic degenerative mitral
regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:833–838
151. Colucci WS, Packer M, Bristow MR, Gilbert EM, Cohn JN,
Fowler MB, Krueger SK, Hershberger R, Uretsky BF, Bowers
JA, Sackner-Bernstein JD, Young ST, Holcslaw TL, Lukas MA
(1996) Carvedilol inhibits clinical progression in patients with
mild symptoms of heart failure. US Carvedilol Heart Failure
Study Group. Circulation 94:2800–2806
152. Australia/New Zealand Heart Failure Research Collaborative
Group (1997) Randomised, placebo-controlled trial of carvedi-
lol in patients with congestive heart failure due to ischaemic
heart disease. Australia/New Zealand Heart Failure. Lancet
349:375–380
153. Basu S, Senior R, Raval U, van der Does R, Bruckner T, Lahiri
A (1997) Beneficial effects of intravenous and oral carvedilol
treatment in acute myocardial infarction. A placebo-controlled,
randomized trial. Circulation 96:183–191
154. Leonetti Luparini R, Celli V, Piccirillo G, Guidi V, Cacciafesta
M, Marigliano V (1999) Carvedilol in elderly patients with
chronic heart failure, a 12 weeks randomized, placebo con-
trolled open trial. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 29:275–282
155. Lowes BD, Gill EA, Abraham WT, Larrain JR, Robertson AD,
Bristow MR, Gilbert EM (1999) Effects of carvedilol on left
ventricular mass, chamber geometry, and mitral regurgitation in
chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol 83:1201–1205
156. Cohn JN, Johnson G, Ziesche S, Cobb F, Francis G, Tristani F,
Smith R, Dunkman WB, Loeb H, Wong M et al (1991) A
comparison of enalapril with hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate in
the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med
325:303–310
157. Doi M, Yano M, Kobayashi S, Kohno M, Tokuhisa T, Okuda S,
Suetsugu M, Hisamatsu Y, Ohkusa T, Kohno M, Matsuzaki M
(2002) Propranolol prevents the development of heart failure by
restoring FKBP12.6-mediated stabilization of ryanodine recep-
tor. Circulation 105:1374–1379
158. Reiken S, Wehrens XH, Vest JA, Barbone A, Klotz S, Mancini
D, Burkhoff D, Marks AR (2003) Beta-blockers restore calcium
release channel function and improve cardiac muscle perfor-
mance in human heart failure. Circulation 107:2459–2466
159. Sun YL, Hu SJ, Wang LH, Hu Y, Zhou JY (2005) Effect of beta-
blockers on cardiac function and calcium handling protein in
postinfarction heart failure rats. Chest 128:1812–1821
160. Bartholomeu JB, Vanzelli AS, Rolim NP, Ferreira JC, Bechara
LR, Tanaka LY, Rosa KT, Alves MM, Medeiros A, Mattos KC,
Coelho MA, Irigoyen MC, Krieger EM, Krieger JE, Negrao CE,
Ramires PR, Guatimosim S, Brum PC (2008) Intracellular
mechanisms of specific beta-adrenoceptor antagonists involved
in improved cardiac function and survival in a genetic model of
heart failure. J Mol Cell Cardiol 45:240–249
161. Prabhu SD, Wang G, Luo J, Gu Y, Ping P, Chandrasekar B
(2003) Beta-adrenergic receptor blockade modulates Bcl-
X(S) expression and reduces apoptosis in failing myocardium.
J Mol Cell Cardiol 35:483–493
162. Zhou X, Ma L, Habibi J, Whaley-Connell A, Hayden MR,
Tilmon RD, Brown AN, Kim JA, Demarco VG, Sowers JR
(2010) Nebivolol improves diastolic dysfunction and myocardial
remodeling through reductions in oxidative stress in the Zucker
obese rat. Hypertension 55:880–888
163. Cimmino G, Ibanez B, Giannarelli C, Prat-Gonzalez S, Hutter R,
Garcia M, Sanz J, Fuster V, Badimon JJ (2011) Carvedilol
administration in acute myocardial infarction results in stronger
inhibition of early markers of left ventricular remodeling than
metoprolol. Int J Cardiol 153:256–261
164. Zaca V, Rastogi S, Mishra S, Wang M, Sharov VG, Gupta RC,
Goldstein S, Sabbah HN (2009) Atenolol is inferior to meto-
prolol in improving left ventricular function and preventing
ventricular remodeling in dogs with heart failure. Cardiology
112:294–302
165. Bristow MR, Ginsburg R, Umans V, Fowler M, Minobe W,
Rasmussen R, Zera P, Menlove R, Shah P, Jamieson S et al
(1986) Beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic-receptor subpopulations in
nonfailing and failing human ventricular myocardium: coupling
of both receptor subtypes to muscle contraction and selective
beta 1-receptor down-regulation in heart failure. Circ Res
59:297–309
166. Baker JG (2005) The selectivity of beta-adrenoceptor antago-
nists at the human beta1, beta2 and beta3 adrenoceptors. Br J
Pharmacol 144:317–322
167. Hou Y, Sun Y, Shan H, Li X, Zhang M, Zhou X, Xing S, Sun H,
Chu W, Qiao G, Lu Y (2012) Beta-adrenoceptor regulates
miRNA expression in rat heart. Med Sci Monit 18:BR309–
BR314
168. Zhu W, Yang L, Shan H, Zhang Y, Zhou R, Su Z, Du Z (2011)
MicroRNA expression analysis: clinical advantage of propran-
olol reveals key microRNAs in myocardial infarction. PLoS
ONE 6:e14736
169. Lu Y, Zhang Y, Shan H, Pan Z, Li X, Li B, Xu C, Zhang B,
Zhang F, Dong D, Song W, Qiao G, Yang B (2009) MicroRNA-
1 downregulation by propranolol in a rat model of myocardial
infarction: a new mechanism for ischaemic cardioprotection.
Cardiovasc Res 84:434–441
170. Ye H, Ling S, Castillo AC, Thomas B, Long B, Qian J, Perez-
Polo JR, Ye Y, Chen X, Birnbaum Y (2013) Nebivolol induces
distinct changes in profibrosis microRNA expression compared
with atenolol, in salt-sensitive hypertensive rats. Hypertension
61:1008–1013
171. Tran Quang T, Rozec B, Audigane L, Gauthier C (2009)
Investigation of the different adrenoceptor targets of nebivolol
enantiomers in rat thoracic aorta. Br J Pharmacol 156:601–608
Heart Fail Rev
123
172. CIBIS Investigators and Committees (1994) A randomized trial
of beta-blockade in heart failure. The Cardiac Insufficiency
Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS). CIBIS Investigators and Committees.
Circulation 90:1765–1773
173. Beta-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial, I (2001) A trial of the
beta-blocker bucindolol in patients with advanced chronic heart
failure. N Engl J Med 344:1659–1667
174. Packer M, Bristow MR, Cohn JN, Colucci WS, Fowler MB,
Gilbert EM, Shusterman NH (1996) The effect of carvedilol on
morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
U.S. Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group. N Engl J Med
334:1349–1355
175. van Veldhuisen DJ, Cohen-Solal A, Bohm M, Anker SD, Ba-
balis D, Roughton M, Coats AJ, Poole-Wilson PA, Flather MD,
Investigators S (2009) Beta-blockade with nebivolol in elderly
heart failure patients with impaired and preserved left ventric-
ular ejection fraction: data from SENIORS (Study of Effects of
Nebivolol Intervention on Outcomes and Rehospitalization in
Seniors With Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol 53:2150–2158
176. Ceron CS, Rizzi E, Guimaraes DA, Martins-Oliveira A, Gerlach
RF, Tanus-Santos JE (2013) Nebivolol attenuates prooxidant
and profibrotic mechanisms involving TGF-beta and MMPs, and
decreases vascular remodeling in renovascular hypertension.
Free Radic Biol Med 65C:47–56
Heart Fail Rev
123