43

43-72 Chung-Hwa Buddhist Studies, No. 16, pp. 43-72 (2015) New Taipei: The Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies ISSN: 1026-969X

602-664

1837-19111849-1927632-682652-715

2015.07.312015.11.17

44

45

602-664

1

2 1837-19111849-1927632-682652-7153

738-839 904-975

4

1

292-314 2

350-378 3 170-172

(L) John Makeham ed.,

Transforming Consciousness: Yogcra Thought in Modern China. 4 17

46

5

6

1500-1584 71546-16231545-16081506-15848

5

29-31

6 5 1-2 7

36-41 8

215-258

47

1535-16151544-1604

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9

1599-1655

5 4-5 9

159

48

10

1560-1609 1564-1636 1525-1590

11

12 13 1071-1128 14

10

145c 11 147b 12 377-379

217-237 13

1-34

14 562b

49

15

16

171549-1613 18

1565-1624

19 20

15

105-150 16 26 17 105-106

2011.12.25 18 12-13

374-375 19

143-190 20

679a

50

21

22

1543-161623

24

163017541707

21 21-23 22

23 19 24 53 99-201

51

[]25

1580-1650

26

17401741

[]

27

25 10 17 26

231-232 27 46 3537

52

28

1630-1707

29

1592-1673

30

28 48 545759626970715 29

30

163

53

167016851674168031

32

33 16661801

87-106107-132 31

87-106 32

157-170 33

54

1

1675 [] [] []

*

1692 [] 1699 [] 1675 1681 16961709 [] [] 16961715

55

[] 1729

*

34

2

1678

1681

1666

1. 16802. 1705

1. 2.

1781

1682

1. 1672 2. 16813. 1705

1. 2. 3.

34 6 1728 7 25 9

31-32 11 200

56

1704

35

1741

35

57

336

/

1752

1804-1884

1727

1793

1704

39

1671-1729

1704

1714

/

36

http://base1.nijl.ac.jp/infolib/meta_pub/KTGDefault.exe?DEF_XSL=default

&GRP_ID=G0001401&DB_ID=G0001401KTG&IS_TYPE=meta&IS_STYLE=d

efault>

58

1

424

1684

39

1637-1690

1699

59

16721617-1700

16931669-17161652-173937

38

39

1780-18621857-193040

41

42

37

104 146-148 38 39 138 40 486 41 246 42 250

60

43

44

45

46

1688-1736

47

karmadhraya-samsa tatpurua-samsabahuvrhi-samsa dvandva-samsa avyybhva-samsa dvigu-samsa

43 296 44 163 45 35 46

47 189

61

48

49

50

1751-1810 51

52

48 Medieval Chinese Buddhist Exegesis and Chinese Grammatical

Studies28 124-136 49 11 198-201 50

39 601 51 1758

1762

1809

169-175 52 39 596

62

53

54

55

1734-180156

57

1722-179158

53 54 1888 55 600-604 56 57 2-3 58

63

59

60

47-72

1-16 59 1 60 1

64

65

66

59 51 39 79 17 73 104 14 4

1998

1972

1933-1936 1980 36 1-

16 1962-1964

1993-1999 1971 1992 1991 2007

1989-1990 1978

67

6 169-175 2014

1888 1944 2011 2011.12.25 2013

98 47-72 1990 2001 7

2014 2014.3

36-41 2011 2002

157-170 1998

24 215-258 1996

44.2 170-172(L) 1935 2011

1985 2008

105-150 2010a

2010b

2014 Medieval Chinese Buddhist Exegesis and Chinese Grammatical

Studies28 105-142

68

2014a

2014.10.18-19 2014b

28 143-190 2015

11 217-237 2001

50.1 29-31 1987 1 1-41 2007 16 1-34

http://base1.nijl.ac.jp/infolib/meta_pub/KTGDefault. exe?DEF_XSL=default&GRP_ID=G0001401&DB_ID=G0001401KTG&IS_TYPE=meta&IS_STYLE=default

Makeham, John ed.. 2014 Transforming Consciousness: Yogcra Thought in Modern China. New York: Oxford University Press.

69

70

71

A Preliminary Study on Spread and Acceptance of Late Ming Yogcra Works During the Edo Period

Chien, Kai-Ting Doctoral Student

Department of Chinese Literature, National Tsing Hua Universi ty

Abstract

When first introduced to China, there were Ti-lun School and She-lun School who studied Yogcra works. Later in the Tang Dynasty, Xuanzang (602-664) and the mission led by him systematically translated or re-translated Indian Yogcra works into Chinese. Research and development is very prosperous in that time. The development of so-called Fa-xiang School was not limited to China. Silla monks and Japan monks who came to China seeking Dharma also brought Yogcra works back to their places, thus forming their own distinctive traditions. The transmission and exchange of Yogcra works between China and Japan, seen in the description of general history was mainly in two periods. Firstly, in the Tang Dynasty, visiting monks brought Yogcra works back to Japan; then, during the late Qing Dynasty, Yang Wenhui (1837-1911), with the help of Nanj Buny (1849-1927), brought back some lost works, including those of Kuiji (632-682), Huizhao (652-715), etc. The distribution in those two periods both resulted in great popularity and lasting impacts in their places. However, there is yet a rarely noticed history of distribution in between. During the late Ming Dynasty, there were a group of monks and laity attempting to study the thoughts of Yogcra works, such as Cheng Weishi Lun, Yin Ming Ru Zheng Li Lun, and Guan Suo Yuan Yuan Lun translated in Tang Dynasty. And, the boom has extended to the early Qing

72

Dynasty. Part of the works of this period was introduced into Japan, some wewe even re-published there. Interestingly, exactly what works had been brought into and spread in Japan? How many of them were re-published? What monks were interested in these books? And in terms of ideology had any impact caused? Unfortunately, what we have known is still quite limited so far. Therefore, this study starts with the bibliographical perspective, investigating the spread of late Ming Yogcra works in Japan during the Edo Period, the sorts of the re-published books, and Edo monks comments on these works.

In conclusion, its pointed out that those late Ming Yogcra works brought into Japan during the Edo Period were introduced as part of Jiaxingzang. Meanwhile, Japanese block-printed editions also such as Cheng Weishi Lun Suquan, Cheng Weishi Lun Guanxin Fayao, etc., appeared in Japanese bookstores. In addition, as for annotating the late Ming Yogcra works, Tendai Anrakuin monks and Shingon monks were the most enthusiastic; the main selected objects for annotation were the books which had been incorporated into Xiangzong Bayao.

Keywords: Late Ming Buddhism, Yogcra Buddhism, Xiangzong Bayao, Edo period Buddhism, Transmission of books