JOHANNA M. MANZORESEARCHER

DR. FLAVIANO M. MUYO, JR.PROFESSOR

MULTIMEDIA FACILITIES AND STUDENT’S ACADEMIC

PERFORMANCE

PANEL MEMBERS

MEM Students

Dr. Flaviano M. Muyo, Jr Chairman

Chapter i

INTRODUCTION

Background of the Study

Management is getting things done through people. It involves the processes including planning, organizing, development and evaluation, Muyo 2012.

Multimedia, defined, is the combination of various digital media types such as text ,images, sound and video, into an integrated multi-sensory interactive application or presentation to convey a message or information to an audience.

Quality education is a universal goal. It is common to hear arguments that instructional technology will be the key to educational quality.

According to Meiers (2009), rapid continuing advances in information and communication technologies are changing the way people share, use, develop and process information and technology. Meier added that there is a growing evidence that use of ICT in the classroom can enhance learning.

Background of the Study

Multimedia is changing the way we communicate with each other, sending and receiving messages is more effectively done and better comprehended (Vaughan,1998).

Neo and Neo (2000) in their own view, opined that multimedia has introduced important changes in our educational system and impact the way we communicate information to the learners.

Background of the Study

Information and Communication Technology (ICT), according to Adedeji (2010) as cited by Adesoji (2012), has been an instrument for achieving social, economic, educational, scientific and technological development.

ICT has greatly influenced the educational sector specially on teaching, learning and research.

Background of

the Study

Background of the Study

We are all aware that in the traditional teaching model, the teacher holds on to the knowledge base and delivers that knowledge base directly to the student. The use of innovative multimedia practices, however allows for a change in the role of teacher in education.

With this change in role, the teacher becomes a true facilitator, a manager of the learning process rather than the source of all knowledge.

Background of the Study

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

This study aims to determine the significant relationship between the use of multimedia facilities and student’s academic performance as perceived by teachers.

Specifically, this study will seek answers to the following questions:

1. Is there any significant relationship between the use of multimedia facilities and academic performance of students?

2. What are the effects of the use of multimedia facilities in the performance of students as perceived by teachers and by themselves?

3. Is the use of multimedia facilities in teaching improves the level of students’ performance?

The result of the studycan be useful to the following:

Teachers

Students

Researchers

Significance of the Study

SCOPE & DELIMITATION

This study will be limited only in determining the significant relationship between the use of multimedia facilities and the academic performance of students as perceived by teachers and by themselves.

This will further be limited among the first year to fourth year high school students in the District of San Agustin during the school year 2013-2014.

CHAPTER II

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

Theoretical Framework“ Teaching and learning are just two kinds

of the same coin. Since there are many ways of learning, there should also be different methods of teaching” ( Lardizabal, et.al.,1997). According to the theory of methodology, since every student has individual differences, the teacher may used varied ways to introduce the lesson.

Related Literature

Multimedia technology did not happen overnight. It has changed the way we look at computers.

Since the late 1970’s, desktop computers used in the home and office have evolved into sophisticated systems that helps us get our jobs done, deliver information and provide entertainment.

Multimedia technology and applications have found many places in the home in the late 1980’s.

The evolution of multimedia has made it very possible to the learners to become involved in their work. With multimedia technologies, they can create multimedia applications as part of their project requirements. This would make them active participant in their own learning process, instead of just a passive learner of educational content (Neo and Neo, 2000).

The use of multimedia in industries according to Lindrom (1994) has been extensive, as it has been effective in increasing productivity and retention rates, where research has shown that people remember 20% of what they see, 40%of what they see and hear, but about 75% of what they see and hear and do simultaneously.

Multimedia has also been shown to elicit the highest rate of information retention and result in shorter learning time (Hofstetter, 1995).

Current achievements in the field of computer and information technologies have now offered tremendous opportunities for learning by electronic means (Rozina, 2002).

It has been observed that the traditional method of lesson delivery and educational services can no longer meet the demand for education (World Bank, 2001).

Conceptual FrameworkINDEPENDENT

VARIABLES

DEPENDENT VARIABLES

STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC

PERFORMANCE

HighAverage

Low

MULTIMEDIA FACILITIES USED

ComputersInternetProjector

PowerPoint Presentations

TelevisionFilm viewing

1. There is no significant relationship between the use of multimedia facilities and students’ academic performance.

2. The use of multimedia facilities do not have effects on the academic performance of students.

3. The use of multimedia facilities in teaching will not improve the level of students’ performance.

HYPOTHESES

Definition of TermsThe following terms are operationally defined to

achieve clarity and understanding of the research work.

Academic performance – is the outcome of education_ the extent to which a student, teacher or institution has achieved their goals; it is measured by examinations assessment

Computer s - are the main tool used to present multimedia items such as video, powerpoint presentations, animations and sound.

Internet – another multimedia that works in tandem with computers

Multimedia – is a multiple tool used to present or convey something; these are usually recorded and played, displayed or accessed by electronic or computerized devices

Powerpoint presentations - is one the most popular programs used for creating multimedia presentations; an incredible tool because it allows teachers to combine text, audio, and video into one presentation

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

CHAPTER III

RESEARCH METHOD

The Descriptive survey type of research will be

used in this study.

RESEARCH LOCALE &TIME OF STUDY

.

The study will be conducted in all public secondary schools in San Agustin during the school year 2013-2014.

SAMPLING DESIGN

Random Sampling will be used in the choice of student respondents.

Complete Enumeration of secondary teachers as respondents.

RESEARCH INSTRUMENT

The research instrument that will be used in this study is the questionnaire to both high school

students and teachers to obtain data on students and teachers’ perceptions of the

students’ academic performance with regard to multimedia facilities used.

STATISTICAL TREATMENT OF DATA

Weighted Mean will be used to describe the perceptions of the respondents on

the proposed SLM.

Weighted Mean = ∑wx n

where: ∑= summation x = number of responses w = weight of responses n = number of cases

Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient

will be used to determine the significant relationships between the use of multimedia facilities and student’s academic performance as perceived by teachers.

STATISTICAL TREATMENT OF DATA

THESIS PROPOSED BUDGETRESOURCES COST

PERSONNEL P 2,000.00ORAL DEFENSE P 4,000.00 MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENTS P 2,000.00

TRANSPORTATION P 3,000.00ACTUAL CONDUCT OF THE STUDY P 5,000.00

PRINTING, EDITING,ETC. P 4,000.00

INCIDENTAL EXPENSES P 4,000.00

TOTAL P 24,00.00

ACTIVITIES TARGET DATE REMARKS

RESEARCH PROPOSAL DEFENSE 1st Week of August TBU

PREPARATION OF THE MATERIALS

2nd Week of August TBU

CONDUCT OF THE STUDY September 1-30, 2013 TBU

SAMPLING Every week sampling TBU

DATA ANALYSIS Every after sampling/October, 2013

TBU

FINALIZATION OF FINAL REPORT November, 2013 TBU

GANTT CHART

THANK YOU !!!