a retrospective cohort analysis: are prophylactic antibiotics required prior to needle localised...
TRANSCRIPT
502 ABSTRACTS
Results: 51% of the clinic letters were sent to the patients. Two con-
sultants comprised of 26% that were primarily addressed to the patient
while the other 25% was mainly achieved by one other consultant. There
was only one letter that indicated that the patient had declined to receive
the letter. 54% of the letters were in freeform and 46% were in a mix of
freeform and pro-forma. Collectively, 90% of the letters included clinical
presentation and follow-up with 82% indicating the working diagnosis but
again, there was a variation between the consultants and clinics.
Conclusion: Currently, the department is not fully complying with the
DoH guideline and should endeavour to improve this. The letters include
varying information and a uniform pro-forma with additional freeform is
also recommended to ensure all important clinical information is included.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.01.181
P146. Breast self-examination: A novel health promotion medium
Thomas Lewis
University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
Introduction: The rapid increase in popularity of mobile technology
amongst the general population mean that medical ‘apps’ could provide
a new medium for health promotion and breast self-examination. This
study aims to quantitatively identify the number of breast self-examination
apps available and qualitatively assess the common features of these apps.
Methods: A systematic search of the Apple iTunes store was carried
out using keywords related to breast screening and self-examination.
Apps that failed to meet strict inclusion criteria were discarded. Each sum-
mary page was reviewed and data extracted using a standardised form.
Results: Initially 369 apps were identified. These could be broadly
broken down into 3 subject categories e breast cancer and self-examina-
tion apps, breast-feeding apps and irrelevant ‘spoof’ apps. 5.4% (n¼20)
met the inclusion criteria. Only 5 were also available for the Android plat-
form. The majority (n¼18) were free to download. Features common to
these self-examination apps included:
� Questionnaire related to breast ‘red flag’ signs and symptoms
� Instruction guidance in the form of images or video
� Advice to seek medical attention if appropriate
� Automated reminders to complete self-examination
Conclusions: There are a number of apps with useful functionality
available which healthcare professionals can recommend for breast self-ex-
amination purposes however it is unlikely that a patient will be able to re-
liably find these apps themselves given the number of irrelevant ‘spoof’
apps available. Mobile technology offers a number of advantageous fea-
tures over traditional methods. Further research needs to evaluate the effi-
cacy of mobile apps for breast self-examination purposes.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.01.182
P147. A retrospective cohort analysis: Are prophylactic antibiotics
required prior to needle localised breast surgery?
Delme Luff, Loraine Kalra, Akhil Johri, Richardo Bonomi
Worthing Hospital, Worthing, West Sussex, UK
Introduction: Breast Cancer is the most common female cancer, result-
ing in the highest rate of female cancer related mortality.Wide local excision
is the commonest surgical procedure performed for breast cancer and com-
monly requires needle localisation. Prophylactic antibiotics have been shown
to lower the risk surgical site infections in several specialties. However, their
use in breast cancer surgery is controversial. We have retrospectively
examined the rate of surgical site infections after needle localised breast sur-
gery and whether this was improved with peri-operative antibiotic cover.
Method: Retrospective analysis of infection rates for all needle local-
ised breast surgery at Worthing Hospital between 31/10/11 and 30/4/12.
One surgical team routinely prescribes peri-operative antibiotics and the
other does not. Theatre lists were retrieved from the hospital database.
The breast care nurses notes were reviewed for evidence of surgical site
infections as per the CDC/NHSN surveillance definitions. The hospital da-
tabase was also reviewed for post operative wound culture results.
Results: A total number of 92 needle localised breast surgical pro-
cedures were performed (51 who received prophylactic antibiotics and
41 who did not). Infection rates were 11.76% and 17.7% for the anti-
biotic group and the control group respectively. This difference was
found not to be statistically significant (OR¼0.61 ((95% CI 0.20,
2.10), RR¼0.69 (95 % CI 0.25, 1.89), RRR¼31.1% (95% CI
-0.89,0.75), NNT¼18.83)
Conclusions: This study suggests that there is no benefit for prophy-
lactic antibiotics for needle localised breast surgery. Double blind rando-
mised placebo control studies would help strengthen this evidence.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.01.183
P148. A new level 1 oncoplastic technique for breast conserving
surgery: Rotational glandular flap
Eleanore J.D. Massey, Pedro Gouveia, Claude Nos, Isabelle Sarfati,
Krishna Clough
L’Institut du Sein, Paris, France
Introduction:When performing conservative surgery for breast cancer,
breast reshaping can be a challenging procedure. This is particularly true for
upper inner quadrant tumours. Level 1 oncoplastic surgery techniques, i.e.
advancement or rotation of glandular flaps into the cavity should preferen-
tially be performed when less than 20 per cent breast volume is excised.
Method: A new Level 1 OPS technique based on the rotation of a wide
centro-lateral glandular flap into the cavity is described.
Results: The principle of the technique is to create a centro-lateral
glandular flap after extensive undermining of the skin and nipple areolar
complex. This flap is then rotated medially into the excision cavity to
fill the defect.
Conclusion: The rotation glandular flap is a new technique for use fol-
lowing a wide excision. It should be used in glandular, not fatty, breasts,
and when standard closure of the cavity would not leave a satisfactory cos-
metic result.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.01.184
P149. Effectiveness of breast cancer follow up in hospital
Eisa Nael, Nikky Adamthwaite
Stafford Hospital, Stafford, UK
Aims:� Review breast cancer follow up practices
� Explore patients opinion on follow up arrangements
NICE clinical follow up guidelines:
� Patients may choose follow up in primary, secondary or shared care
� Agreed written care plan should be recorded by a named healthcare pro-
fessional(s) with a copy to GP and patient
� Care plan should include
i. Named healthcare professional
ii. Symptoms and signs to look for
iii.Contact details for immediate referral