a strategic research and innovation agenda for european ......potential for industry growth from new...
TRANSCRIPT
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe
A
Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda
for European Aviation
(SRIA)
Christoph SchneiderFlughafen München / Munich Airport
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
The History of ACARE
FP6FP7
Vision 2020
SRA2 Addendum
Flightpath 2050
FP5
FP8
SRA 1 SRA 2 SRIA
The High Level Group on Aviation Research
Siim Kallas
and
Maire Geoghegan-Quinn
inviting
- Meeting Societal and Market Needs
- Maintaining and Extending Industrial Leadership
- Protecting the Environment and the Energy Supply
- Ensuring Safety and Security
- Prioritising Research, Testing Capabilitiesand Education
Flighpath 2050Europe’s Vision for Aviation
Maintaining Global Leadership &Serving Society’s Needs
Flighpath 2050 was presented at Aerodays in Madrid 30/03-01-04 2011
see http://ec.europa.eu/research/transport/publications
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe
From Flightpath 2050 to SRIA
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe
The ACARE working structure
Market and societal
needs
Sesar JU & Munich
Airport
Finmeccanica
Competitiveness Airbus & KLM Eurocopter
Environment & Energy SAFRAN & Rolls Royce IATA
Safety & Security EASA & Eurocontrol EU
Education &
Infrastructure
DLR & Tu Delft DLR
Member States Group DE & NL EU
Monitoring Group UK & Thales Eurocontrol
Communications
Group
ASD
Steering Group, chaired by the CommissionS
RIA
Gro
ups
Perm
anent
gro
ups
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe
The SRIA engagement
- September 2011 – July / September 2012
- Overall ~280 participants in the 5 WGs
- Stakeholders from 18 countries
- Balanced representation of stakeholders
°°°° Industry: 33 %
°°°° Academia 29%
°°°° Air Transport 10%
°°°° EC: 10%, MS: 9%
°°°° Others 9%
Identify short (2020), medium (2035) and long term (2050)Research and Innovation actions enabling to reach 2050 goals
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe
Timeline of SRIA Planning & Editing
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
2011 2012
Installation of Steering Group
Coordination by Steering Group / Support by NEARS
Formation of NEARS Working Groups
Workshop Sessions
Vol.1SRIA endorsement
Vol.1Drafting the SRIA
Flightpath 2050
Finalisation (incl. lay-out & printing) of Vol.1 & Vol.2
SRIAPublic Roll-Out
Aug Sep
ILA 2012
Vol.2
Vol.1 Vol.2
Farnborough
ACARE General Assemblies
we are here
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe 9
Final Product
Executive Summary• Aimed at: Decision makers
• Volume: app. 10-12 pages
• Content: Key findings of SRIA (important results, consequences, impact, ...)
SRIA Volume 1• Aimed at: Policy makers
• Volume: app. 70-80 pages
• Content: consistent composition of WG findings (SRIA facts, figures & results)explanation and elaboration of key messages
SRIA Volume 2• Aimed at: Research and innovation actors
• Volume: app. 100-120 pages (?)
• Content: Maps technologies/innovation concepts on main goals (table / database format)
Meeting Societaland Market Needs
- European citizens are able to make
informed mobility choices
- 90% of travellers within Europe are able to
complete their journey, door-to-door within 4 hours.
- Flights arrive within 1 minute of the
planned arrival time
- Air traffic management system is capable
of handling 25 million flights a year in
Europe
- A coherent ground infrastructure is
developed
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe
WG1 Mobility - Enablers
• Customer Expectation & Role in transport and mobility
• Market and Societal Opportunity & Acceptance
• Mobility System Concepts
• Mobility System Design
• Mobility System Performance
• From Research to Innovation
Foundation
• Travel Management
• Assessment of mobility choices
• IT for intermodal mobility choices
• Disruption and Recovery Management
• Crisis Management and Contingency Planning
Travel Process
Management
• Air Transport Interface Nodes
• Aviation Ground Node Neighbourhood
• Information Platform for Operations
• Management of Air Traffic – Services to Airspace Users
• System Intelligence, Automation, Human and Autonomy
Aviation
11
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe
To reach Flightpath 2050 goals …..
12
WG1 Key Messages
Customers & Society:Variety of transport services tailored to individual needs.Commercial air transport part of an integrated, seamless system.
Market:Potential for industry growth from new technology & services.
Air Transport System:Customer connected, accessible, capable, sustainable & affordable.Part of a seamless overall transport design of managed services.
Airports:Neighbourhood-friendly multi-modal transport nodes.Seamless transfer and enhanced customer experience.
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe
WG 1 Main Conclusions
13
Main Conclusions
Much additional Research, Innovation and Political push needed to make Flightpath 2050 intermodality and performance goals a reality.
4hr door to door goal is the opportunity for new innovative services and aviation growth in an intermodal transport environment. Aviation is in a key position to take a leading role in realising the
integrated transport system.
Big technological as well as societal challenges need to be solved to enable future aviation services, infrastructure and system performance.
Maintaining and Extending Industrial Leadership
- The whole European aviation industry is strongly competitive
- Europe maintains leading
edge design, manufacturing and system integration
capabilities and jobs
- Certification and upgrade
processes are fast and cost
effective
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe
WG 2 Competitiveness
Regulations andStandards
• Level playing field with RoW• Impose requirements• Ambitious target setting• Close coop. with industry/
operators• Harmonise civil/military
Continuous and focusedinvestment
• European private & public investment
• Long innovation cycles - Large scale investment
• Efficient & focussed programmes• Positive legal & fiscal incentives
Research and Innovation Lifecycle
• Sustain the full research chain:• Full scope of the vehicle and its
operation in the aviation system, • Support strategic resources• Creation of excellence clusters for
innovation & CPD• Support multi-sector exchanges
Efficient Development & Manufacturing Processes
• Engage total supply chain• Transcontinental development
processes• Improved manufacturing capability
and assembly process• MRO/operational requirements
secured early
Efficient Certification
• Certification process efficient, low
cost and globally adopted• EASA leading certification body• Virtual environments/simulation:
accepted means of compliance• Efficient modular certification
Technology, Demonstration and Flight test
• Breakthrough technologies for aircraft and aviation system
• High level EU demonstrators• X-Planes, Demo-airport
• Research facilities and capabilities at National and European level
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe
WG2 Main Conclusions
16
Policy: The EU should ensure a level playing field with the rest of the world for
its (civil and military) aviation industries through the right policies, certification processes, funding and regulations, in close cooperation with the main
stakeholders, so that its aviation industry remains competitive and jobs are
created.
Technology: The EU aviation industry needs to identify and implement novel technologies which enable advanced design, manufacturing, operation, support
and end of life processes, with simulation as a prominent means of certification.
Breakthrough product technologies need to result from the efforts spent in a constantly fed chain of research and innovation activities which are performed
by an EU wide cooperation of all aviation actors.
Innovation: There is a clear need for Europe to plan, organize and fund a series of vehicles as flying demonstrations of innovation. These “X-planes”
would integrate a range of novel technologies in a single experimental platform
to secure the competitive position of European industry. We must find new
ways to leverage resources and skills between academia, research centres and industry in order to quickly and efficiently bring these “breakthrough” innovations to the marketplace for the benefit of the whole aviation sector, from OEMs to MROs.
Protecting the Environment and the Energy Supply
-75% reduction in CO2 emissions
per passenger kilometre to
support the ATAG target, a 90% reduction in NOx emissions, 65% reduction of the perceived noise
(Reference: 2000).
-Aircraft movements are emission-free when taxiing.
-Air vehicles are designed and
manufactured to be recyclable.
-Europe is established as a centre
of excellence on sustainable alternative fuels
-Europe is at the forefront of atmospheric research
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe
WG 3 Environment and Energy
Innovative products and
technologies� System level approach
� Vehicle architecture
� Propulsion/aero integration
� Energy management
� ‘More Electric’ Architectures
� New materials (composite,
nano…)
Optimized A/C operations� Situation awareness
(weather, airports traffic, other vehicles)
� Multiple parameters optimization
� Capitalize on SESAR capabilities
Environmental Targets � Identify key potential contributors
� Allocate specific targets to each
Atmospheric impact science� Understand local interactions
between air vehicle / atmosphere
� Provide climate scientists with
accurate models of initial impact
� Cooperate with climate scientists
Alternative fuel� Optimized specification� Consolidate biomass potential� Transformation process� Global policy
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe
WG 3 Main Conclusions
19
Main Conclusions Key Measures
Fulfilling the very ambitious environmental
goals of “Flightpath 2050” will require the
development of breakthrough solutions
beyond today’s known capabilities
• A strong H2020 Aviation Programme including demonstrators
• Initiate long reaching technologies, including eXploratory aircraft
• Extend evaluation processes to all aspects of the air transport
system
The challenges ahead need wider system
approaches to be developed, in parallel to
traditional approaches, with minimum
overall environmental impact being a
major criterion
• Integration concepts at several levels, e.g. :
• Total aircraft energy management and system integration
• Radical propulsion/airframe integration concept
• Co-development of green airport and new aircraft
concepts
• Establish multi stakeholder working bodies around the key
integration concepts to accelerate the development of solutions.
New sustainable “low-carbon” energy will
be needed in large quantities
• Challenge the energy sector to deliver commercial quantities of
affordable sustainable fuel.
• Develop new sources with better conversion efficiency for on
board “secondary power”.
The regulatory and economic framework
should facilitate the implementation of
innovative green solutions
• Certification process/practices must evolve to ease the
introduction of disruptive products and services through more
anticipation and reduced overall cost.
• New market based measures, developed from advances in
climate modelling, should be a source for incentivising innovative
green solutions
Ensuring Safety and Security
-The European air transport system has less
than one accident per ten million commercial
aircraft flights. (- 80% for specific operations, reference: 2000)
-Weather and other hazards are precisely evaluated and mitigated
-Seamless operations through fully interoperable
and networked systems (incl. manned and unmanned vehicles)
-Efficient boarding and security checks allow seamless security
-Air vehicles are resilient to security threats
-The air transport system has access and uses
high bandwidth data network
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe
WG4 Safety & Security
Societal Expectation� Safety and security
management systems
� Intelligence
� Behaviour analysis
� Non-intrusive security
capabilities
Air Vehicle Operation� Safety and security
management systems� Air vehicle mission
management systems and procedures
� Health and Usage Monitoring and self healing capabilities
� Survivability
Design Manufacturing and Certification
� Diagnostic Analysis� Innovative standardisation,
certification and approval processes
� System Resilliance� Survivability
Human Factors� Capabilities and capacities
of human performance in Aviation
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe
WG 4 Main Conclusions
22
Main Conclusions Key Measures
Adaptability and coherency - regulatory system must evolve
• Better integration of regulatory responsibilities and governance; Global approach essential
• SES 3 to include security dimension
Priority - Efficient, pain-free, queue-less and threat modulated security processing at embarkation nodes
• Innovative technologies, methods, processes and services
• Connected intelligence• Outcome focused risk based security
Essential design requirements – early involvement of regulatory competences
• automated capture, analysis and alerting of current and emergent aviation vulnerabilities.
Human Performance – a key consideration for future human centred automation design
• Research to optimise and allocate functions between human and machine
• New team concepts• Passenger / Staff behaviours
Intelligence, automation and information management - increased exposure to hostile cyber activity
• Technology derived from military applications• New system engineering approach
Innovative aerial applications and services & Survivability
• Novel materials and manufacturing techniques• New design approaches
Prioritising Research, Testing Capabilities and Education
- Europe has a long term research and innovation strategy
- Networks of multi-disciplinary
technology clusters are created
- Europe has strategic, aerospace test,
simulation and development facilities
- Students are attracted to careers in
aviation.
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe24
Support
SupportSupport
Teach
Support Industry & Society
European Aviation Master
Life-long Learning
Prioritising Research, Testing Capabilities and
Education
RaCE - Watcher
Researc
h
Te
sti
ng
C
ap
ab
ilit
ies
Pri
mary
E
du
cati
on
Seco
nd
ary
E
du
cati
on
Orient
• watches• controls• supports
Mile
sto
nes
Societal Needs
Industrial Leadership
Environment & Energy
Safety & Security
Input/Interaction
Pu
pils
& S
tud
ents
Pro
fessio
nals
WG5 Infrastructures - Education
©dpa©Airbus ©Airbus©DLR
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in EuropeAdvisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe
WG5 Main Conclusions
– Aviation research needs an even more coordinated approach to fulfill FP2050 goals. Research is the key element for education, innovation,
knowledge, and infrastructure. European aviation research always has the complete system in mind.
– Strategic aviation infrastructure needs to be of highest quality and efficiency, producing results for products, research and education,
organized in a network for the best usability of all stakeholders, serving
societal needs and industrial leadership.
– Education is organized in Europe in a network of stakeholders. Aviation is attracting students and workforce of all kind. European graduation and
lifelong learning are the standard, based on modern teaching tools as
well as cutting edge infrastructure.
General Assembly asked to:
Endorse the need to launch and establish a roadmap for strategic infrastructure including new models e.g. private, public partnerships
25
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe
GA - Key Discussion Points and Endorsements
26
WG Discussion Point General Assembly asked to...
WG1 The 4hr door-to-door goal offers an
opportunity for aviation in an intermodal
transport environment.
Endorse the need for the aviation sector to
take a leading role in developing an
integrated transport system.
WG2 Aviation as a sector requires regulatory
stimulus and technological excellence to
maintain competitiveness and sustain
future growth and create jobs.
In line with European ambition and goals,
to reinforce European effort to ensure that
international regulatory approach is
coherent.
Endorse the proposal for large-scale
technology demonstration.
WG3 The scale of the environmental goals are
challenging and the solutions needed are
not fully known today. New processes,
systems and approaches are needed to
address this.
Endorse that design priorities and
operational practices should be increased
towards lower environment impact.
Build new processes and breakthrough
approaches into future research
requirements.
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe 27
WG Discussion Point General Assembly asked to...
WG3 The importance of alternative fuels to
aviation warrants a specific EU mandate
to create a level playing field with land
transport.
Note that ACARE goals cannot be
achieved without this and therefore
consider options for securing the
necessary political support.
WG3 Further understanding of climate science
and non-CO2 effects at an international
level is imperative.
Further research is needed to better
understand the impact of aviation on the
atmosphere.
WG4 Regulatory system must evolve to ensure
high adaptability and responsiveness to
accommodate emerging risks and
facilitate the introduction of innovative
products and services.
Support the better integration of aviation
safety and security regulatory
responsibility and governance, creating
synergies, efficiencies and resolving
potentially conflicting measures.
WG5 There is a need for a world-class
strategic infrastructure for the aviation
sector to be available throughout Europe.
Endorse the need to launch and establish
a roadmap for strategic infrastructure
including new models e.g. private, public
partnerships.
GA - Key Discussion Points and Endorsements
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe 28
From left to Right
Marc Ventre - Safran - ACARE Vice-Chair
Peter Hartman - KLM - ACARE Vice-Chair
Siim Kallas - EC - Vice-President
Tom Enders - Airbus - ACARE Chair
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe
Endorsement Process based on Questions..
• Q1: Are the SRIA and the key messages of the WGs reflecting the ambitions of
Flightpath 2050 in an appropriate way?
• Q2: Is the SRIA covering all relevant areas or do you see gaps that should be
addressed?
• Q3: : Given that Volume 2 of the SRIA describes concrete Research and Innovation
needs to achieve the Vision - What level of detail should be provided in VOL2 of the
SRIA?
• Q4: How could the value of the SRIA be improved for your national stakeholders
including those planning research and innovation?
• Q4: What suggestions do you have to implement the SRIA in your country, or at a
European level?
Note: Draft version of questions only (still to be finalized)