a study of majorana dark matterphys.cts.nthu.edu.tw/files/seminar_news/1562_26e8ce93.pdfstudy of...
TRANSCRIPT
Study of Majorana Fermionic Dark Matter
Gwo-Guang Wong (CYCU) @NTU
May 9, 2016
based on ArXiv1512.01991[hep-ph]in collaboration with Chun-Khiang Chua
Outline
• Why Dark Matter?
• Relic Density
• Why Majorana Fermionic Dark Matter?
• Model Construction
• Direct Search
• Indirect Search
• Summary and Conclusion
The first evidence of DM was observed by Fritz Zwicky in 1933.
The evidence of dark matter can be “seen” everywhere from(a) the galactic scale, (b) the scale of galaxy clusters, (c) the cosmological scale
𝐺𝑀(𝑟)𝑚
𝑟2= 𝑚
𝑣(𝑟)2
𝑟
⇒ 𝑣(𝑟) =𝐺𝑀(𝑟)
𝑟
From the cosmological scale,• the WMAP and Planck results based on (CMB) show that
0026.01198.0
8
3 & /
model, CDM thefittingBy
2
2
h
G
H
obs
CDM
ccCDM
( from PDG )
Boltzmann Equation
• The DM particles are assumed to be created thermally during the big bang, and froze out of thermal equilibrium in the early universe with a relic density. The evolution of DM abundance is described by
)2/()4(|vv| v& vv
frame. comoving in the |vv||vv| vwhere
][v3
22
lab1,lab2,
lab
annl Mann
2
21
2
21l M
l Mann
Gelmini] F. and P.Gondolo (1991) B360 Phys. [Nucl.
msmss
nnnnHndt
dnEqEq
• The DM became NR particles when they froze out of thermal equilibrium in the early universe.
• From Maxwell velocity distribution,
• The velocity averaged DM annihilation cross section can be written as
)v(vbaall)v(
)v1/11(2 & )(
42NR
ann
22
ann
O
mss
)/1(b/ 6av 2
ann xOx
)20( T
m
xv
vvvvvv
kTvm/6
22
2
3
2
12
2
0
2
211
2
1
2
2
0
)parameteratuer out temper(freeze where T
mx
• At Tf , DM interaction rate is equal to the Universe expansion rate, namely,
• The freeze-out temperature parameter can be solved numerically by
g* is the total effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom
• By solving the Boltzmann Equation, the relic density is approximately
)(vann f
eq
f THn
)30,20(~)/(2
)/6(
8
45)2(ln
2/1
*
3
PL
f
f
ff
f
fT
mx
xxmg
xbaMmgccx
)(3v
)( where
)()(
GeV1004.1
321
2
ann
*PL
-192
fff
x
f
f
CDM
xObxaxdxx
xJ
xJmgMh
f
)miracle (WIMP v
cpb1.0~
Weakly Interactive Massive Particles (WIMPs)
• WIMPs are NR, non-luminous and non-baryon particles with masses in the range from few GeV to few TeV and they can interact with ordinary matter only via the weak interactions.
• The lightest neutral WIMPs consist of the cold DM.
• CDM is old for long time existence with ~27% Relic abundance
Schematic Diagram for Boltzmann Equation
tvT
m
kTvm
2
0
2
0
1
2
3
2
1
Dark Matter Detection Strategies
• Direct Detection in underground laboratories• DM-nucleus elastic scattering
• Detectors waiting for WIMPs colliding
• Annihilation signatures in astrophysical observation• DM annihilation processes have been ceased after the
freeze-out stage in the cosmological scale to give the present DM relic density.
• However, DM annihilation to SM particles still occur today in regions of high DM density and result in the indirect search for end products as excesses relative to products from SM astrophysical processes.
• DM direct production at colliders
Why study Majorana fermionic DM ?
• In direct search, a Dirac DM particle usually companied with large SI cross section via vector-vector interaction but not via scalar-scalar interaction
246
10)3.2(8.4~
3)(
gv
mg
ud
hN
Majorana Fermionic DM Model Construction-Step 1
Multiplets 2I+1 2I+1 2 2
, :
Z2 odd 2-comp Weyl Spinors.
: SM Higgs doublet.
Isospin I I 1/2 1/2
Hypercharge -Y Y 1/2 -1/2
1 ~
2
1 2
12
2
,,'
3
2
2
222
1,
24
ΔΔ )(
2
12cos3
)(4
1)sin
4
1(2sin)1(2()
cos(
sduq N
n
qn
p
qp
Lmn
Wmn
nm WZ
J
SSqT
ZAZIM
g
Unsuccessful Model
• The cross section of DM scattering off nuclei is
excluded by the experimental upper limit from direct detections.
• In fact, two mass degenerate Majorana fermions form a Dirac fermion.
~10−40𝑐𝑚2
↑𝜃 = 𝜋/4
Model Construction-Step 2
Multiplet 2I+1 2I+1 2 2
, :
Z2 odd 2-comp Weyl Spinors.
: SM Higgs doublet.
Fields
Isospin I I 1/2 1/2
Hypercharge -Y Y 1/2 -1/2
1 ~2
][~
(IV) ],[~
(III) ],[ (II) ],[ (I) 2121 newnewnewnew
1 2
14
Model Construction
Multiplet 2I+1 2I+1 2I 2I 2I+2 2I+2 2I 2I 2I+2 2I+2
field
Isospin I I I-1/2 I-1/2 I+1/2 I+1/2 I-1/2 I-1/2 I+1/2 I+1/2
Hyper-
charge-Y Y -(Y-1/2) (Y-1/2) -(Y-1/2) (Y-1/2) -(Y+1/2) (Y+1/2) -(Y+1/2) (Y+1/2)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
][~
(IV) ],[~
(III) ],[ (II) ],[ (I) 2121 newnewnewnew
15
Model Construction
To have Majorana DM, need Y=1/2,I=n+1/2
Y=1/2, I=n+1/2, Multiplet 2n+2 2n+2 2 2 2n+1 2n+1 2n+3 2n+3 2n+1 2n+1 2n+3 2n+3
I 1/2 1/2 n+1/2 n+1/2 n n n+1 n+1 n n n+1 n+1
Y=1/2 1/2 -1/2 -1/2 1/2 0 0 0 0 -1 1 -1 1
1~
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4~3 and6~5
16
Lagrangian for Neutral WIMP Masses
sign). the to(up and where
..~
~
~
~
2
1
2
1
0
5
0
6
0
3
0
4
0
10
0
1
2/15
1,2/1,2/110
0
9
0
2
2/15
1,2/1,2/19
0
8
0
1
2/14
1,2/1,2/18
0
7
0
2
2/14
1,2/1,2/17
0
6
0
1
2/13
0,2/1,2/16
0
5
0
2
2/13
0,2/1,2/15
0
4
0
1
2/12
0,2/1,2/14
0
3
0
2
2/12
0,2/1,2/13
0
9
0
10
5
1,15
0
7
0
8
4
1,14
0
5
0
6
3
0,03
0
3
0
4
2
0,02
0
1
0
2
1
2/1,2/11
0
cHgg
gg
gg
gg
Lm
[5 mass paramters: 1~5, 8 Yukawa couplings:g3~10. ]
Lagrangian for Neutral WIMP Masses
0)(00000)1(2
2)(
)(000000
000)(000)1(2
)(
00)(000)1(2
)(0
000002
)(
2
000002
)(
2
00)1(2
)(
2
)(
2
)(0)(
)1(2
2)(0
)1(2
)(0
22)(0
5
10
59
4
18
1
4
17
3
5
1
6
2
34
9
75
1
3
1
1
108
1
641
1
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
nnn
n
nn
n
n
nvg
vg
n
nvg
n
nvg
vgvg
vgvg
vgn
nvgvgvg
n
nvg
n
nvgvgvg
Y
and ) , , , , , , ,( where.. 2
1 0
10
0
9
0
8
0
7
0
5
0
3
0
2
0
1
0000 TT
m cHYL ) 2
1 ( nI
[5 mass parameters: 1~5, 8 Yukawa couplings: g3~10. ]18
Lagrangian for Majorana Fermion Masses with I=Y=1/2
0*
0
0
*
0
0
0
0*0
00
510
59
3
56
2
34
9
53
1
10
641
0
10
0
9
0
5
0
3
0
2
0
1
0000
~)()(~
0000
0000
00022
00022
022
0
022
0
and ) , , , , ,( where.. 2
1
jRijLij
j
j
RijLij
i
i
i
jiji
jiji
ij
TT
m
PNPNPNPNN
N
vg
vg
vgvg
vgvg
vgvgvg
vgvgvg
Y
cHYL
19
DM sector of MSSM as a special case of the model with I=1/2, Y=1/2
Comparing to MSSM, Rep. 117, (1985) 75]
MSSM relation
GUT relation: when embedding SU(2)xU(1) in GUT.
.0 ,0 , , ,
) //tan that Note (
,cossin2 ,coscos2
,sinsin2 ,sincos2
),( , ,
),like(wino ),like(bino ' ),likehiggsino(~ ,~
10,9,8,75423121
5634
65
43
5
1
2
2
1
3
0
5
0
3
20
2
10
1
21
21
gMM
gggg
mgmg
mgmg
i
ii
WZWZ
WZWZ
HH
HH
W 2
32 tan3
5
20
Contour Plots of DM Mass and Gaugino Fraction[Jungman, et al., Phys. Rep. 267 (1996) 195]
21
Lagragian for Single Charged WIMP Masses with I=Y=1/2
] '~ :Ex [
~)(~
~)(~
)(
)(
002
002
0022
where..0
0
2
1
) , , ,( & ) ' ,' ,' ,'( basis With the
2/1
1
2/1
2
1
*
*
5
9
4
7
25
108
61
0
9
0
7
1
5
2/1
1
0
10
0
8
1
5
2/1
2
kRikLik
i
i
i
kRikLik
i
i
i
jiji
jiji
T
m
TT
PVPU
PUPV
U
V
vg
vg
vg
vgvgvg
XcHX
XL
22
Lagrangian for H-boson interaction with neutral WIMPs
00000
00000
000022
000022
022
00
022
00
and
)( with where
~)(~
10
9
56
34
9
53
10
64
**
000000
g
g
gg
gg
ggg
ggg
f
OONfNO
POPOHL
kl
L
ij
R
ijljklik
L
ij
jR
R
ijL
L
ijiH
HHH
HH
ji
Lagrangian for Z-boson interaction with neutral WIMPs
~~
cos2
)for isospin of comp. third theis(
and where
~)(~
cos2
0
1
50
111
*
6
1
00
01
01
00
ZOg
L
q
OONNqO
POPOZg
L
Z
ZZZ
ZZ
ji
L
WZ
kk
L
ij
R
ij
k
kjikk
L
ij
jR
R
ijL
L
iji
WZ
• The Lagrangian for WIMPs interacting with SM gauge bosons in 4-component notation can be derived from the gauge invariance terms in 2-component notation: ji
iji
aa
ij BygWgT )'(
Lagrangian for W-boson interaction with neutral & single charged WIMPs
,
2000
0000
0020
0000
0000
0001
,
2000
0000
0020
0000
0001
0000
and
)(mod
and
)(mod
)1,-1,-1,-1 ()1()(mod and )( ,)( where
]~)(~ [~)(~[ 2
00
0*
6
1
4
,1
0
6
1
4
,1
0*
6
1
4
,1
0
6
1
4
,1
1)2,2mod(
000
kl
T
kl
T
lj
T
klik
k l
R
ij
ljklik
k l
Lw
ij
T
ljklik
k l
R
ij
lj
T
klik
k l
L
ij
IR
ij
R
ij
L
ij
L
ij
jR
R
ijL
L
ij
μ
ijR
R
ijL
L
ij
μ
iW
TT
NTUO
NTViO
UTNO
VTNjO
jOOOO
POPOγWPOPOγWg
L
WW
W
jWWWW
WWWW
DM sector of MSSM as a special case of the model with I=1/2, Y=1/2
Consider three typical cases:
(A) MSSM-like case: 1~3, 5 4 neutral &2 single charged particles
(SUSY-like I): With GUT relation and tan=2 (1, 3 are 2 free),(SUSY-like II): With GUT relation and tan=20 (1, 3 are 2 free),(SUSY-like III): Without GUT relation and tan=2 (1~3 are 3 free), (SUSY-like IV): Without GUT and tan relations (1~3, g3~6 are 7 free),
(B) Reduced case: Minimal number of multiplets 1~3
(1, 2, g3, g4 are 4 free)3 neutral &1 single charged particles
(C) Extended case: Maximal number of multiplets 1~3, 5, 7-10
(1~5, g3~10 are 13 free parameters). )6 neutral & 4 single charged particles26
Random Sampling
For each case, we survey
DM mass m (1,2500) GeV,
and generate 10,000 samples by random sampling, if these parameters are not set to zeros
mass parameters: i (0,8000) GeV ,Yukawa coupling: gi (0,1).
27
Calculation
• For each sample, we numerically solve
(1) the WIMP masses and couplings coupled to W, Z & H bosons,
(2) the freeze-out temperature parameter Xf ,
(3) the velocity averaged <σv> in freeze-out stage & present stage,
(4) the relic density Ωh2 ,
(5) the normalized SI cross section of DM- 129,131Xe scattering: NSI ,
(6) the normalized SD corss section of DM-129,131Xe scattering: SDn, SD
p.
ii
mm
,0
Ten Constraints:Relic Density:
CDMh2=0.11980.0026 from PDG.
Direct Search:
LUX gives a curve for the upper limit of SI .
[LUX Collaboration, PRL 113 (2014) 091303]
XENON100 gives two curves for the upper limits of SDn, SD
p.
[XENON100 Collaboration, PRL 111 (2013) 021301]
Indirect Search:
Fermi-LAT gives six constraints on
[Fermi-LAT Collaboration, PRL 115, 231301 (2015)]
veeuubbWW ),, , ,,(
29
Fermi-LAT result in indirect search [arXiv:1503.02641 ]
• The dwarf Spheroidal satellite galaxies (dSphs) of the MilkyWay are some of the most dark matter dominated objects known.
• The six years of Fermi-LAT gamma-ray data are analyzed from 15 (dSphs) and put the upper limits on the DM annihilation cross section for several decay channels with dark matter masses between 10 GeV and 10 TeV.
Indirect Search• Two quantities are crucial for both direct and indirect DM search:
[Jungman’s Physics Reports (1996)]
• Also,
[C. Kochanek, astro-ph/9505068]
• Location of 15 dSphs analyzed in Ferme-LAT:
12
0
0
-1
0
s km 270vv despersion velocity DM
kpc. 5.8 & cm GeV 3.0)(density DM local rr
kpc. 100 & s km230)(v
kpc. 5.8 & s km220)(v
1
rot
0
1
0rot
r r
r r
1-
max
mins km 300v
kpc 233II) Leo(
kpc 231) Segue(
r
r
Feynman Diagrams for DM Annihilation Processes
32
2 & v h
Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundance[K. Griest & D. Seckle, PRD 43, 3192 (1991) ]
•Coannihilationcoannihilation becomes significantly important if the mass splitting mTfbetween the DM particle and the other WIMP.
•Forbidden channel annihilation
Kinematically Forbidden: is wrong at the freeze-out temperature.
•Annihilation near poles
is poor near the pole.
ba mmm 1
2
)v(vbaall)v( 42NR
ann O
Relic Density Calculation from annihilation
))()v1
11((2 ])2/v(erf[1 vB)v)A(( v
v )( where
)()(
GeV1004.1
)/(2
v
8
45)2(ln
))()v1
11((2 B)v)A(( vv
2v
2
2
2
0
ann
,
2
NRann
*PL
1-92
2/1
*
3
NRannPL
2
2
24/v
ann
0
2
,
2/3
NRann
2
BAf
BA
x
f
f
CDM
ff
f
BA
x
BA
mmmxd
dxx
xJ
xJmgMh
xxmg
Mmgccx
mmmedx
f
Feynman Diagrams for DM Coannihilation Processes
35
Coannihilation [J. Edsjo & P. Gondolo, PRD 56, 1879 (1997)]
Lagrangian for Z-boson interaction with single charged WIMPs
)4,3,2,1,(
sin2
1sinˆ
sin2
1sinˆ
where
~~~)(~
cos
2
2
*
21
*
1
23*
2*
22
*
11
23
/
ji
UUUUUTUO
VVVVVTVO
eAPOPOZg
L
WijjijiijW
T
kjkkik
R
ij
WijjijiijWkjkkik
L
ij
iiiR
R
ijL
L
iji
WZ
Z
Z
ZZ
ji
Lagrangian for H-boson interaction with single charged WIMPs
0002
0002
00022
0
&
0002
0002
00022
0
where
..~)(~
..~)(~
10
8
6
975
9
7
5
1086
0
*0
g
g
g
ggg
h
g
g
g
ggg
h
cHPOPOH
cHPUhVPVhUHL
R
ij
L
ij
kR
R
mkL
L
mkm
kR
T
jk
R
ijmiLjk
L
ijmimH
HH
ji
Recent experimental results in Direct Search
LUX(Xe):[PRL 112, 091303 (2014)] [XENON100(Xe}:PRL 111, 021301 (2013)]
]) ( [ 0Set
neutron by dominantedspin nuclear model group Odd
neutrons ofnumber odd with nucleus Xein
2
129,131
54
nnppp
pn
SaSaa
SS
0. assumingby p/n single awith
section crossreport alistsexperiment target,
materialdifferent from results compare To
/ pna
Recent experimental results in Direct Search
[SIMPLE(C2ClF5):PRD 89, 072013 (2014][PICO-2L(C3F8 ):PRL 114, 231302 (2015)] [PICO-60(CF3I):PRD 93, 052014 (2016)]
[XENON100(Xe):PRL 111, 021301 (2013)]
protonby dominatedspin nuclear assumingby 0Set na
Effective Lagrangian for Direct Search
q
W
q
LVV
L
W
q
q
LAA
L
W
q
L
HW
q
q
L
HW
q
q
q
Aq
q
Ah
q
Vq
q
Vh
q
h
q
h
hhVhAheff
QTggOM
gib
TggOM
gd
OmM
gma
OmM
gmia
qqdjdjqqbjbjqqasqqas
ssjjL
Z
Z
H
H
2
311
2
311
2
112
'
112
5
0
1
50
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
50
1
0
1
50
1
sin2
1 & )
2( 2
2
1 & )
2(
2
1
)Im(2
)Re(2
and
, , ,'' ,
where
'~~~~~~~~
Scattering Amplitude for Direct Search
.0)0( ,0
,4)0( ),(4)0(
),(||)','(),(||)','(12
1
),(||)','(),(||)','(12
1
define ,,,,,For
)ly respective particles Majorana& Diracfor 2,1(
),(||)','(),()','(
),(|'|)','(),()','(
),(||)','(),()','(
),(),,(||)','(),','(
,,
222,
',
',
5
5
q
mqgmppq
spNOspNspNOspNJ
W
spOspspOspJ
PSVAYX
spNjjspNspuspui
spNsspNspuspui
spNsspNspuspui
spNspiLspNspiM
ppSPAPAS
SSAA
ss
hXhX
N
XY
ss
YX
XY
hVhA
h
h
fi
N
znp
np
tbcqq
q
sduq
np
Tq
sduqq
np
Tq
qnsp
snspqsN
N
nnpp
Fn
n
qp
p
qqAN
udduVN
sNVNNNANN
SSSSVVAAAAAA
fi
J
S
m
af
m
faf
fZAZfaf
J
SaSaGdQ
bbZAbbQ
fQv
vJJQ
v
vmm
WWWqM
,,
,
,,,,
),(
,,
),(
,
22
2
22
2
2222
,,2
127
2
and
])([
2
)2()()2Z(
where
1)1(
13
4416
|)0(|
Amplitude for DM scattering off Xe-nuclus
0.009 0.272 2/3
0.010 0.329 2/1
nucleus
(2012)] 103511 86, PRD al.,et Menendez, J.[
15.0 ,78.0 ,48.0
15.0 ,48.0 ,78.0
:nucleon ain component spin quark
,118.0 ,036.0 ,026.0
,118.0 ,014.0 ,020.0
:parameternucleon
(2000)] 304 48, PLB al.,et Ellis, R. [J.
131
129
e
e
pn
n
s
n
d
n
u
p
s
p
d
p
u
n
Tn
n
Td
n
Tu
p
Tn
p
Td
p
Tu
X
X
SSJ
fff
fff
DM-Xe nucleus Scattering Cross Section
(2012)] 103511 86, PRD al.,et Menendez J.by given EFT chiral [from
2/ & )( form theare Xefor factors structure The
. and )()()(|)|( where)0||(
|)|(|)(|
] 603, (1987) 195 PLB al.,et Ahlen [S.P.
],GeV)/0.91([0.3 cm10 & )/(5.1 & )2/exp(|)(|
where
|)(|||4
|)(|||4
|)(| ||
)0(||
||16||
)0(||
9
0n
22
,
129,131
1,011
2
1011000
2
0
2
D
1/313
0
2
0000
2
I
22
4
022
02
I
2
4
022
I
0
2
2
22
4
0
2
22
2
2
22
4
0
0
2222
22
22
qbuuceuS
aaaqSaqSaaqSaqSqS
qSqF
mRRmQQqqF
qFqdv
qFqdv
qFqd
qdqd
Mmmqd
qdqd
n
nij
u
ij
npS
NNS
SD
vAA
S
vS
A
v
N
v
i
DM-nucleon Scattering Cross Section• To compare results from different target materials, it is reported with
the scaled cross section of DM-nucleon scattering:
experiment Xenon100in used 21.8%Xe)( & 26.2%Xe)(
:abundance Isotop
3
14)(
)(
131
2
129
1
1
2
,
2
,
2
,
1
2
2
2
j Anp
AnpA
j
i
Ai
SD
np
j p
A
jj
i
Ai
Z
N
j
jj
i
j
i
J
JS
A
Distributions of Dark Matter ParticlesFraction(%)Main ingredient
>60%
SUSY-like I
GUT & tan=2
SUSY-like II
GUT & tan=20
SUSY-like III
GUT & tan=20
MSSM-like (IV)
GUT & tanReduced Extended
Higgsino-like28.5% 27.7% 32.8% 31.3% 49.7% 28.6%
Bino-like71.1% 72.0% 33.4% 33.5% 49.5% 33.9%
Wino-like0 0 33.3% 34.0% 0 31.0%
Non MSSM-like0 0 0 0 0 5.3%
MixedMain ingredient
<=60%0.4% 0.3% 0.5% 1.2% 0.8% 1.2%
We call a H,B,W,X-like particle if main ingredient (>60%) is in 1,2 , 3, 5, 9,10 respectively.
Particle Attribute: Red:Higgsino-like, Blue:Bino-like, Green:Wino-like, Magenta:non SUSY-like.
SUSY-like I: GUT & tan =2
B~
B~
vbb )(
vWW )( SI
SD
n v)(
2h
H~ H
~____H~
____ B~
__
__
H~____B
~B~ B
~H~
H~ ____
74% (ruled out) 23% survived
46
__
__
20% survived
__
25.7% survived 25.7% survived 25% survived
Particle Attribute: Red:Higgsino-like, Blue:Bino-like, Green:Wino-like, Magenta:non SUSY-like.
SUSY-like I: GUT & tan =2 (Allowed DM candidates)
vbb )(
vWW )( SI
SD
n v)(
2h
__
Without considering the outliers, m(H-like)≥456, m(B-like)≥1411 GeV.
61% 26%
Particle Attribute: Red:Higgsino-like, Blue:Bino-like, Green:Wino-like, Magenta:non SUSY-like.
SUSY-like II: GUT & tan =20
vbb )(
vWW )( SI
SD
n v)(
2h
83% 14%
48
Particle Attribute: Red:Higgsino-like, Blue:Bino-like, Green:Wino-like, Magenta:non SUSY-like.
SUSY-like II: GUT & tan =20 (Allowed DM candidates)
vbb )(
vWW )( SI
SD
n v)(
2h
83% 14%
49
Without considering the outliers, m(H-like)≥457 and m(B-like)≥1257 GeV.
vbb )(
vWW )( SI
SD
n v)(
2h __
____
Particle Attribute: Red:Higgsino-like, Blue:Bino-like, Green:Wino-like, Magenta:non SUSY-like.
SUSY-like III: GUT & tan =2
62%
50
vbb )(
vWW )( SI
SD
n v)(
2h __
____
Particle Attribute: Red:Higgsino-like, Blue:Bino-like, Green:Wino-like, Magenta:non SUSY-like.
SUSY-like III: GUT & tan =2 (Allowed DM candidates)
62%
28% survived
Apart from the outliers, m(H-like)≥457, m(B-like)≥341 & m(W-like)≥1120 GeV.
Particle Attribute: Red:Higgsino-like, Blue:Bino-like, Green:Wino-like, Magenta:non SUSY-like.
SUSY-like IV: GUT & tan
vbb )(
vWW )( SI
SD
n v)(
2h __
53%33%
52
Particle Attribute: Red:Higgsino-like, Blue:Bino-like, Green:Wino-like, Magenta:non SUSY-like.
SUSY-like IV: GUT & tan (Allowed DM candidates)
vbb )(
vWW )( SI
SD
n v)(
2h __
53%33%
53
Apart from the outliers, m(H-like)≥454, m(B-like)≥288 & m(W-like)≥1090 GeV.
Particle Attribute: Red:Higgsino-like, Blue:Bino-like, Green:Wino-like, Magenta:non SUSY-like.
Reduced
vbb )(
vWW )( SI
SD
n v)(
2h
61% 26%
54
Particle Attribute: Red:Higgsino-like, Blue:Bino-like, Green:Wino-like, Magenta:non SUSY-like.
Reduced (Allowed DM candidates)
vbb )(
vWW )( SI
SD
n v)(
2h
__
Without considering the outliers, m(H-like)≥454, m(B-like)≥317 GeV.
61% 26%
55
Particle Attribute: Red:Higgsino-like, Blue:Bino-like, Green:Wino-like, Magenta:non SUSY-like.
Extended
vWW )( SI
SD
n
2h
__
43%
56
vbb )( v)(
Particle Attribute: Red:Higgsino-like, Blue:Bino-like, Green:Wino-like, Magenta:non SUSY-like.
Extended (Allowed DM candidates)
vWW )( SI
SD
n
2h
43%
57
vbb )( v)(
Apart from the outliers, m(H-like)≥456, m(B-like)≥1141, m(W-like)≥1107 & m(X)≥738 GeV.
%Case A
SUSY-like I SUSY-like II SUSY-like III SUSY-like IV Case B
ReducedCase C
Extended
H-like (28.51, 17.98) (27.59, 13.54) (32.76, 14.72) (31.26, 14.52)63.06 49.07 44.93 46.45
(49.73, 23.70)47.65
(28.62, 12.81)44.76
B-like (71.07, 0.22) (72.07, 0.18) (33.38, 0.30) (33.53, 7.89)0.31 0.25 0.90 23.52
(49.43, 11.29)22.84
(33.94, 7.43)21.89
W-like X X (33.31, 15.03) (33.97, 13.19)X X 45.12 38.83
XX
(30.93, 9.56)30.91
X-like X X X XX X X X
XX
( 5.25, 3.24)61.71
TABLE V: Particle attribute distribution of the allowed DM candidates. The values in the first row “H-like” and the first column “SUSY-like I” of the table mean that 28.52% of the samples in SUSY-like I case are H-like and only 17.89% of the samples are the allowed H-like particles, or equivalently, among the H-like particles, 63.04%(=17.98/28.52) of them are allowed.
%Case A
SUSY-like I SUSY-like II SUSY-like III SUSY-like IV Case B
ReducedCase C
Extended
H-like 456 457 457 454(456, 940) (457, 937) (457, 947) (454,947)
454(454, 949)
450(450,927)
B-like 1411 1257 341 288X X X X
317X
299X
W-like X X 1120 1090X X (1120, 2500) (1090,2374)
XX
1107(1107,2080)
X-like X X X XX X X X
XX
738(738,1563)
TABLE IV: Allowed mass ranges according to particle attribute to detect DM in the near future. The upper values denote the lower mass bounds (in unit of GeV) to detect DM in the direct search of SI DM-nucleus scattering experiments and the lower intervals denote the mass interval suitable to detect DM in the indirect search of DM annihilation process via W+W- channel between the present limit and the projected limit which is taken to be one order of magnitude lower than the present one.
Summary on the DM particle attributes• The B-like DM particles can be detected only through the SI DM-nucleus
scattering experiments. • The lower mass bound of H-like particles is about 450 GeV, independent of GUT
or MSSM relations for all cases.• For cases of SUSY-like I to III with GUT or MSSM relations, less than 0.1% of the
sample are allowed B-like particles. Cases with GUT relation, m(B-like) > 1 TeVand cases without GUT relation, the lower mass bound of B-like particles can lower down to 288 GeV.
• W-like particles are heavy with m(W-like) > 1 TeV. m(non SUSY-like X) > 738 GeV.
• Greater than 95% of the allowed H-, W-like and non SUSY-like X particles are highly pure with composition fraction ≥ 90% for all cases. It is also true for B-like particles in the cases without GUT & MSSM relations.
60
Conclusion• We constructed a generic Majorana fermionic DM model.• The DM sector of MSSM is a special case of the model with I=Y=1/2.• We study the constraints from the observation of DM relic density,
the direct search experiments of LUX and XENON100, and the indirect search experiment of Fermi-LAT Collaborations.
• From the constraints, we find all allowed range of mass parameters, Yukawa couplings and coupling strengths.
• We show the lower mass bound to detect DM from SI DM-nucleus scattering experiments and mass interval suitable to detect DM from DM annihilation to W+W- experiments respectively.
61
i
Next Goal:
•Calculation on Coannihilation
•Calculation on Electroweak Bremsstrahlung in Dark Matter Annihilation
•Calculation on Sommerfeld enhancement effect
• Simulation on the DM production at colliders
• Simulation on the end products of DM annihilation processes for indirect search.