a study on asset & liability management in avr manufacturers (2)

133
A STUDY ON ASSET & LIABILITY MANAGEMENT IN AVR MANUFACTURERS ABSTRACT This project deals with the “A Study on Asset & Liability Management with reference to AVR Manufacturers”. Asset & Liability Management is concerned with the problems that arise while attempting to manage the current assets, the current liabilities and the inter relationship that exist between them. The goal of Asset & Liability Management is to manage the firm’s current assets and current liabilities in such way that the satisfactory level of working capital is mentioned. The current assets should be large enough to cover its current liabilities in order to ensure a reasonable margin of the safety. AVR Manufacturers is a software development and soft skills training company which offers world class application development services and an unparalleled training in recruitment and soft skills. The main objective of this study is that to study on the Asset & Liability Management and the effectiveness of managing a working capital in a company. The secondary objectives of this study are to study the optimum level of current assets and current liabilities of the company, to study the liquidity position through various working capital related ratios, to study the financial performance using trend analysis tool. Study of the Asset & Liability Management is important because unless the working capital is managed effectively, monitored efficiently planed properly and reviewed periodically at 1

Upload: sai-harsha

Post on 01-May-2017

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

A STUDY ON ASSET & LIABILITY MANAGEMENT IN AVR MANUFACTURERS

ABSTRACT

This project deals with the “A Study on Asset & Liability Management with reference

to AVR Manufacturers”. Asset & Liability Management is concerned with the problems that

arise while attempting to manage the current assets, the current liabilities and the inter

relationship that exist between them. The goal of Asset & Liability Management is to manage

the firm’s current assets and current liabilities in such way that the satisfactory level of

working capital is mentioned. The current assets should be large enough to cover its current

liabilities in order to ensure a reasonable margin of the safety. AVR Manufacturers is a

software development and soft skills training company which offers world class application

development services and an unparalleled training in recruitment and soft skills.

The main objective of this study is that to study on the Asset & Liability Management

and the effectiveness of managing a working capital in a company. The secondary objectives

of this study are to study the optimum level of current assets and current liabilities of the

company, to study the liquidity position through various working capital related ratios, to

study the financial performance using trend analysis tool. Study of the Asset & Liability

Management is important because unless the working capital is managed effectively,

monitored efficiently planed properly and reviewed periodically at regular intervals to

remove bottlenecks if any, the company cannot earn profits and increase its turnover.

The study of working capital is based on tools like Trend Analysis, Ratio Analysis,

working capital leverage, operating cycle etc. Further the study is based on last 5 years

Annual Reports of AVR MANUFACTURERS. And even factors like competitor’s analysis,

industry analysis were not considered while preparing this project. For this study the

secondary data collection method is used. The data collection was aimed at study of Asset &

Liability Management of the company. There is a need for working capital in the form of

current assets to deal with the problem arising out of lack of immediate realization of cash

against goods sold. Therefore sufficient working capital is necessary to sustain sales activity.

Efficient Asset & Liability Management requires that firms should operate with some amount

of net working capital, the exact amount varying from firm to firm and depending, among

1

Page 2: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

other things; on the nature of companies. This study has some of the limitations like limited

data, limited period, limited area and the duration of the study is very low.

It should be realized that the working capital need of the firms may be fluctuating

with changing business activity. This may cause excess or shortage of working capital

frequently. The inadequate amount of working capital can be threatened for the solvency of

the firms because of its inability to meet its current obligation. The management should be

prompt to initiate an action and correct imbalance. The problems of the company are been

analyzed and the suggestions are been given for the company for its future estimation and

management of the working capital. The present study reveals that the liquidity position of

this company is comparatively good as it approaches the standard norms throughout the

period of study.

2

Page 3: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER NO PARTICULARS PAGE NO.

Acknowledgement

Certificate

Contents

List of Tables

List of Charts

1.

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

Asset & Liability Management

Introduction

Need of Asset & Liability Management

Gross W.C and Net W.C

Types of working capital

Determinants of working capital

2.

2.1

2.2

Industry Profile

Industry Profile

Company Profile

3. Review of Literature

4.

4.1

4.2

4.3

4.4

Research Methodology

Introduction

Types of research methodology

Objective of the study

Scope and Limitation of the study

3

Page 4: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

5.

5.1

5.2

5.3

Data analysis and Interpretation

Working capital Analysis

Ratio Analysis

Trend Analysis

6.

6.1

6.2

6.3

Findings & Suggestions

Findings

Suggestion

Conclusion

4

Page 5: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

LIST OF TABLES

Table. no Name of Tables Page. no

5.1.1 Schedule of Changes in Working Capital (2008)

5.1.2 Schedule of Changes in Working Capital (2009)

5.1.3 Schedule of Changes in Working Capital (2010)

5.1.4 Schedule of Changes in Working Capital (2011)

5.2.1 Schedule of Changes in Working Capital (2012)

5.2.2 Current Ratio

5.2.3 Quick Ratio

5.2.4 Absolute Liquid Ratio

5.2.5 Inventory Turnover Ratio

5.2.6 Debtors Turnover Ratio

5.2.7 Creditors Turnover Ratio

5.2.8 Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio

5.2.9 Cash to Current Asset Ratio

5.2.10 Current Asset Turnover Ratio

5.2.11 Inventory to Sales Ratio

5.2.12 Working Capital Turnover Ratio

5.2.13 Inventory to Current Asset Ratio

5.2.14 Gross profit Ratio

5.2.15 Administrative Expenses Ratio

5.3.1 Trend Analysis- Current Asset

5

Page 6: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

5.3.2 Trend Analysis- Fixed Asset

5.3.3 Trend Analysis- Cash and Bank

5.3.4 Trend Analysis- Inventory

5.3.5 Trend Analysis- Sundry Debtors

6

Page 7: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

LIST OF CHARTS

Figure. No Name of Tables Page. no

5.2.2 Current Assets

5.2.3 Fixed Assets

5.2.4 Cash & Bank Balances

5.2.5 Inventory Turnover ratio

5.2.6 Sundry Debtors turnover ratio

5.2.7 Creditors Turnover ratio

5.2.8 Fixed Asset Turnover ratio

5.2.9 Cash to Current Asset

5.2.10 Current Asset Turnover

5.2.11 Inventory Turnover

5.2.12 Working Capital Turnover Ratio

5.2.13 Inventory to Current Asset Ratio

5.2.14 Gross profit Ratio

5.2.15 Administrative Expenses Ratio

5.3.1 Trend Analysis- Current Asset

5.3.2 Trend Analysis- Fixed Asset

5.3.3 Trend Analysis- Cash and Bank

5.3.4 Trend Analysis- Inventory

5.3.5 Trend Analysis- Sundry Debtors

7

Page 8: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

CHAPTER I

ABOUT THE STUDY

1.1) Introduction Asset & Liability Management

Asset & Liability Management is concerned with the problems that arise while

attempting to manage the current assets, the current liabilities and the inter relationship that

exist between them. The term current assets refers to those assets which in ordinary course of

business can be, or, will be, turned in to cash within one year without undergoing a

diminution in value and without disrupting the operation of the firm. The major current assets

are cash, marketable securities, account receivable and inventory. Current liabilities ware

those liabilities which intended at their inception to be paid in ordinary course of business,

within a year, out of the current assets or earnings of the concern. The basic current liabilities

are account payable, bill payable, bank over-draft, and outstanding expenses.

The goal of Asset & Liability Management is to manage the firms current assets and

current liabilities in such way that the satisfactory level of working capital is mentioned. The

current assets should be large enough to cover its current liabilities in order to ensure a

reasonable margin of the safety.

Definition:-

According to Guttmann & Dougall-

“Excess of current assets over current liabilities”

According to Park & Gladson-

The excess of current assets of a business (i.e. cash, accounts receivables,

inventories) over current items owned to employees and others (such as salaries & wages

payable, accounts payable, taxes owned to government).

1.2) Need of Asset & Liability Management

8

Page 9: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

The need for working capital gross or current assets cannot be over emphasized. As

already observed, the objective of financial decision making is to maximize the shareholders

wealth. To achieve this, it is necessary to generate sufficient profits. This will naturally

depend upon the magnitude of the sales among other things but sales cannot convert into

cash. There is a need for working capital in the form of current assets to deal with the

problem arising out of lack of immediate realization of cash against goods sold. Therefore

sufficient working capital is necessary to sustain sales activity. Technically this is refers to

operating or cash cycle. If the company has certain amount of cash, it will be required for

purchasing the raw material which may be available on credit basis. Then the company has to

spend some amount for labor and factory overhead to convert the raw material in work in

progress, and ultimately finished goods. These finished goods convert in to sales on credit

basis in the form of sundry debtors. Sundry debtors are converted into cash after expiry of

credit period. Thus some amount of cash is blocked in raw materials, WIP, finished goods,

and sundry debtors and day to day cash requirements. However some part of current assets

may be financed by the current liabilities also. The amount required to be invested in this

current assets is always higher than the funds available from current liabilities. This is the

precise reason why the needs for working capital arise

1.3) Gross working capital and Net working capital

There are two concepts of Asset & Liability Management

1. Gross working capital

Gross working capital refers to the firm’s investment in current assets. Current assets

are the assets which can be convert in to cash within a year includes cash, short term

securities, debtors, bills receivable and inventory.

2. Net working capital

Net working capital refers to the difference between current assets and current

liabilities. Current liabilities are those claims of outsiders which are expected to mature for

payment within an accounting year and include creditors, bills payable and outstanding

expenses. Net working capital can be positive or negative

9

Page 10: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

Efficient Asset & Liability Management requires that firms should operate with some

amount of net working capital, the exact amount varying from firm to firm and depending,

among other things; on the nature of companies. Net working capital is necessary because the

cash outflows and inflows do not coincide. The cash outflows resulting from payment of

current liabilities are relatively predictable. The cash inflow are however difficult to predict.

The more predictable the cash inflows are, the less net working capital will be required.

The concept of working capital was, first evolved by Karl Marx. Marx used the term

variable capital means outlays for payrolls advanced to workers before the completion of

work. He compared this with constant capital which according to him is nothing but dead

labor. This variable capital is nothing but wage fund which remains blocked in terms of

financial management, in work- in-process along with other operating expenses until it is

released through sale of finished goods. Although Marx did not mentioned that workers also

gave credit to the firm by accepting periodical payment of wages which funded a portioned of

W.I.P, the concept of working capital, as we understand today was embedded in his variable

capital.

1.4) Types of working capital

The operating cycle creates the need for current assets (working capital). However the

need does not come to an end after the cycle is completed to explain this continuing need of

current assets a destination should be drawn between permanent and temporary working

capital.

1) Permanent working capital

The need for current assets arises, as already observed, because of the cash cycle. To

carry on business certain minimum level of working capital is necessary on continues and

uninterrupted basis. For all practical purpose, this requirement will have to be met

permanent as with other fixed assets. This requirement refers to as permanent or fixed

working capital

2) Temporary working capital

10

Page 11: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

Any amount over and above the permanent level of working capital is temporary,

fluctuating or variable, working capital. This portion of the required working capital is

needed to meet fluctuation in demand consequent upon changes in production and sales as

result of seasonal changes

Graph shows that the permanent level is fairly constant; while temporary working capital is

fluctuating in the case of an expanding firm the permanent working capital line may not be

horizontal. This may be because of changes in demand for permanent current assets might be

increasing to support a rising level of activity.

1.5) Determinants of working capital

The amount of working capital is depends upon a following factors

1. Nature of business

Some businesses are such, due to their very nature, that their requirement of fixed

capital is more rather than working capital. These businesses sell services and not the

commodities and that too on cash basis. As such, no funds are blocked in piling inventories

and also no funds are blocked in receivables. E.g. public utility services like railways,

infrastructure oriented project etc. their requirement of working capital is less. On the other

hand, there are some businesses like trading activity, where requirement of fixed capital is

less but more money is blocked in inventories and debtors.

2. Length of production cycle

In some business like machine tools industry, the time gap between the acquisition of

raw material till the end of final production of finished products itself is quite high. As such

amount may be blocked either in raw material or work in progress or finished goods or even

in debtors. Naturally the need of working capital is high.

3. Size and growth of business

11

Page 12: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

In very small company the working capital requirement is quite high due to high

overhead, higher buying and selling cost etc. as such medium size business positively has

edge over the small companies. Once the business grows beyond a certain limit, the working

capital requirements may be adversely affected by the increasing size.

4. Business/ Trade cycle

If the company is operating in the time of boom, the working capital requirement may

be more as the company may like to buy more raw material, may increase the production and

sales to take the benefit of favorable market, due to increase in the sales, there may be more

and more amount of funds blocked in stock and debtors etc. similarly in the case of

depressions also, working capital may be high as the sales terms of value and quantity may be

reducing, there may be unnecessary piling up of stack without getting sold, the receivable

may not be recovered in time etc.

5. Terms of purchase and sales

Some time due to competition or custom, it may be necessary for the company to

extend more and more credit to customers, as result which more and more amount is locked

up in debtors or bills receivables which increase the working capital requirement. On the

other hand, in the case of purchase, if the credit is offered by suppliers of goods and services,

a part of working capital requirement may be financed by them, but it is necessary to

purchase on cash basis, the working capital requirement will be higher.

6. Profitability

The profitability of the business may be vary in each and every individual case, which

is in turn its depend on numerous factors, but high profitability will positively reduce the

strain on working capital requirement of the company, because the profits to the extent that

they earned in cash may be used to meet the working capital requirement of the company.

12

Page 13: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

CHAPTER II

2.1 INDUSTRY PROFILE:

Automotive:

The Automotive industry in India is one of the largest in the world and one of the fastest

growing globally. India manufactures over 11 million vehicles (including 2 wheeled and 4

wheeled) and exports about 1.5 million every year. It is the world's second largest

manufacturer of motorcycles, with annual sales exceeding 8.5 million in 2009. India's

passenger car and commercial vehicle manufacturing industry is the seventh largest in the

world, with an annual production of more than 2.6 million units in 2009. In 2009, India

emerged as Asia's fourth largest exporter of passenger cars, behind Japan, South Korea and

Thailand.

As of 2009, India is home to 40 million passenger vehicles and more than 2.6 million cars

were sold in India in 2009 (an increase of 26%), making the country the second fastest

growing automobile market in the world. According to the Society of Indian Automobile

Manufacturers, annual car sales are projected to increase up to 5 million vehicles by 2015 and

more than 9 million by 2020. By 2050, the country is expected to top the world in car

volumes with approximately 611 million vehicles on the nation's roads.

A chunk of India's car manufacturing industry is based in and around the city of Chennai,

also known as the "Detroit of India". With the Indian city accounting for 60 per cent of the

country's automotive exports. Gurgaon and Manesar near New Delhi are hubs where all of

the Maruti Suzuki cars in India are manufactured. The Chakan corridor near Pune,

Maharashtra is another vehicular production hub with General Motors, Volkswagen/ Skoda,

Mahindra, Tata in the process of setting up or already set up facilities. Ahmadabad with Tata

Motors Nano plant and Halol with General Motors in Gujarat, Aurangabad in Maharashtra,

Kolkata in West Bengal are some of the other automotive manufacturing regions around the

country.

13

Page 14: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

Industry snapshots

Employment of automotive service technicians and mechanics is expected to increase

as fast as the average through the year 2014. Between 2004-2014, demand for

technicians will grow as the number of vehicles in operation increases, reflecting

continued growth in the number of multi-car families. Growth in demand will be

offset somewhat by slowing population growth and the continuing increase in the

quality and durability of automobiles, which will require less frequent service.

Additional job openings will be due to the need to replace a growing number of

retiring technicians, who tend to be the most experienced workers.

Most persons entering seeking employment in the automotive industry can expect

steady work, even through downturns in the economy. While car owners may

postpone maintenance and repair on their vehicles when their budgets become

strained, and employers of automotive technicians may cutback hiring new workers,

changes in economic conditions generally have minor effects on the automotive

service and repair business.

Opportunities in the automotive industry should be plentiful in vehicle maintenance

and repair occupations, especially for employees with formal automotive service

technician training.

Workforce Issues

Image and Promotion

Among the challenges automotive employers face is overcoming negative public

perceptions of the industry due to stereotypes and misinformation. Specifically, the

industry seeks to counteract this lack of awareness by demonstrating the availability

of viable occupations that pay well and have growth potential. The industry is also

working to develop a pipeline of young employees and transitioning workers from

which health care employers can recruit.

14

Page 15: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

Diversity of the workforce: recruitment and retention

The industry is also focused on increasing diversity in the workforce. To this end,

employers are working to improve the pipeline and the demographic make-up of the

workforce in areas such as race, gender and language diversity.

Capacity and Instruction

The automotive industry is working to assist employees in the attainment of basic soft

skills, such as communications, basic reading, writing and math, problem solving and

customer service skills. Training efforts must include the resources and curriculum to

stay current with today's technology. To aid industry employers in this effort, the

industry has focused on recruiting more teachers and trainers; ensuring that they are

industry-certified and current in their field of knowledge. There is also a need of

continuing education for instructors.

Training and Education

Another concern among industry employers is the availability of training for new

employees and the re-training of incumbent employees. Education centers will be

utilized to focus on the development of standardized curriculum and the importance of

industry-based certification for training programs.

Skill Sets

Automotive technology is rapidly increasing in sophistication, and most training

authorities strongly recommend that persons seeking automotive service technician

and mechanic jobs complete a formal training program in high school or in a

postsecondary vocational school or community college. However, some service

technicians still learn the trade solely by assisting and learning from experienced

workers. Courses in automotive repair, electronics, physics, chemistry, English,

computers and mathematics provide a good educational background for a career as a

service technician.

Opportunities in vehicle maintenance and repair should be plentiful, especially for

persons who complete formal automotive service technician training. The growing

15

Page 16: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

complexity of automotive technology increasingly requires highly trained automotive

service technicians and mechanics to service vehicles. Most persons who enter

maintenance and repair occupations in this industry may expect steady work because

changes in economic conditions have little effect on this part of the dealer's business.

Some automotive manufacturers and their associated dealers sponsor 2-year associate

degree programs at postsecondary schools. Students enrolled in these programs

typically spend alternate 10 to 12-week periods; attending classes full-time and

working full-time in the service departments of participating dealers.

For trainee positions, dealerships increasingly prefer to hire automotive service

technician graduates of postsecondary automotive training programs. Good reading

and basic math skills are required to study technical manuals, keep abreast of new

technology and learn new service and repair techniques as vehicle components and

systems become increasingly sophisticated.

Production workers account for three out of five motor vehicle and equipment

manufacturing jobs. These workers receive most of their training on the job or

through apprenticeship programs

Employment Training and Admistration (ETA) in action:

In June 2003, ETA announced the High Growth Job Training Initiative to engage

businesses with local education providers and the local/regional workforce investment system

to find solutions that address changing talent development needs in various industries.

In October 2005, the Community-Based Job Training Grants were announced to

improve the role of community colleges in providing affordable, flexible and

accessible education for the nation's workforce.

ETA is investing more than $260 million in 26 different regions across the United

States in support of the WIRED (Workforce Innovation in Regional Economic

Development) Initiative. Through WIRED, local leaders design and implement

strategic approaches to regional economic development and job growth. WIRED

focuses on catalyzing the creation of high skill, high wage opportunities for American

workers through an integrated approach to economic and talent development.

16

Page 17: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

These initiatives reinforce ETA's commitment to transform the workforce system

through engaging business, education, state and local governments and other federal

agencies with the goal of creating a skilled workforce to meet the dynamic needs of

today's economy.

Investments

ETA has invested over $20,681,511 in the automotive industry. This includes 12 High

Growth Job Training grants totaling $14,395,956 and five Community-Based Job Training

Grants totaling $6,285,555. Leveraged resources from all of the grantees total $39,061,021.

Resources

For additional background information about the industry and details on the grants,

information about employment and training opportunities and workforce development tools

for employers, educators and workforce professionals

Automobile Industry in India

The Automotive industry in India is one of the largest in the world and one of the fastest

growing globally. India manufactures over 11 million vehicles (including 2 wheeled and 4

wheeled) and exports about 1.5 million every year. It is the world's second largest

manufacturer of motorcycles, with annual sales exceeding 8.5 million in 2009.India's

passenger car and commercial vehicle manufacturing industry is the seventh largest in the

world, with an annual production of more than 2.6 million units in 2009. In 2009, India

emerged as Asia's fourth largest exporter of passenger cars, behind Japan, South Korea, and

Thailand.

As of 2009, India is home to 40 million passenger vehicles and more than 2.6 million cars

were sold in India in 2009 (an increase of 26%), making the country the second fastest

growing automobile market in the world. According to the Society of Indian Automobile

Manufacturers, annual car sales are projected to increase up to 5 million vehicles by 2015 and

more than 9 million by 2020.By 2050, the country is expected to top the world in car volumes

with approximately 611 million vehicles on the nation's roads.

17

Page 18: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

A chunk of India's car manufacturing industry is based in and around Chennai, also known as

the "Detroit of India" with the India operations of BMW, Ford, Hyundai and Nissan

headquartered in the city. Chennai accounts for 60 per cent of the country's automotive

exports. Gurgaon and Manesar near New Delhi are hubs where all of the Maruti Suzuki cars

in India are manufactured. The Chakan corridor near Pune, Maharashtra is another vehicular

production hub with companies like General Motors, Volkswagen, Skoda, Mahindra and

Mahindra, Tata Motors, Mercedes Benz, Fiat and Force Motors having assembly plants in the

area. Ahmedabad with the Tata Nano plant, Halol with General Motors in Gujarat,

Aurangabad with Audi in Maharashtra and Kolkatta with Hindustan Motors in West Bengal

are some of the other automotive manufacturing regions around the country.

1.2.2 Supply chain of Automobile Industry :

The supply chain of automotive industry in India is very similar to the supply chain of the

automotive industry in Europe and America. The orders of the industry arise from the bottom

of the supply chain i. e., from the consumers and go through the automakers and climbs up

until the third tier suppliers. However the products, as channeled in every traditional

automotive industry, flow from the top of the supply chain to reach the consumers.

Automakers in India are the key to the supply chain and are responsible for the products and

innovation in the industry.

The description and the role of each of the contributors to the supply chain are discussed

below.

Third Tier Suppliers: These companies provide basic products like rubber, glass, steel, plastic

and aluminum to the second tier suppliers.

Second Tier Suppliers: These companies design vehicle systems or bodies for First Tier

Suppliers and OEMs. They work on designs provided by the first tier suppliers or OEMs.

1.2.2 Figure showing the Supply Chain of Indian Automobile Industry

18

Page 19: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

They

also

provide engineering resources for detailed designs. Some of their services may include

welding, fabrication, shearing, bending etc.

First Tier Suppliers: These companies provide major systems directly to assemblers. These

companies have global coverage, in order to follow their customers to various locations

around the world. They design and innovate in order to provide “black-box” solutions for the

requirements of their customers. Black-box solutions are solutions created by suppliers using

their own technology to meet the performance and interface requirements set by assemblers.

First tier suppliers are responsible not only for the assembly of parts into complete units like

dashboard, breaks-axel-suspension, seats, or cockpit but also for the management of second-

tier suppliers.

Automakers/Vehicle Manufacturers/Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs): After

researching consumers’ wants and needs, automakers begin designing models which are

tailored to consumers’ demands. The design process normally takes five years. These

companies have manufacturing units where engines are manufactured and parts supplied by

first tier suppliers and second tier suppliers are assembled. Automakers are the key to the

supply chain of the automotive industry. Examples of these companies are Tata Motors,

Maruti Suzuki, Toyota, and Honda. Innovation, design capability and branding are the main

focus of these companies.

19

Page 20: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

Dealers: Once the vehicles are ready they are shipped to the regional branch and from there,

to the authorized dealers of the companies. The dealers then sell the vehicles to the end

customers.

Parts and Accessory: These companies provide products like tires, windshields, and air bags

etc. to automakers and dealers or directly to customers.

Service Providers: Some of the services to the customers include servicing of vehicles,

repairing parts, or financing of vehicles. Many dealers provide these services but, customers

can also choose to go to independent service providers.

2.2 COMPANY PROFILE

ABOUT US

AVR Manufacturers established in the year 2003, with an immense industry

experience of 30 years, have achieved a prominent position in the manufacturing and

supplying of sheet metal components, pressed components and automotive components.

These encompass sheet metal parts, special type washer, precision sheet metal press

components, deep drawn components, and oil seal inner shells. Based on the latest

technology, these are widely used in industries such as Automobile, Automotive, and also in

other engineering firms.

With knowledge and expertise, AVR Manufacturers broadened its horizons into

manufacturing of automobile sheet metal components after surveying and studying both

technical and marketing aspects.  Over the last 10 years, the company has achieved a distinct

place in the market. It has a strong and satisfying clientele.

We channel our endeavours towards achieving absolute customer satisfaction by

offering our clients with qualitative products. Our products, owing to its functionality,

durability, efficiency, and cost effectiveness are preferred by a wide list of clients across

20

Page 21: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

India. In addition to exhibiting finest quality, our entire product range is competitively priced,

enabling us to earn immense credibility and faith of our valued clients.

OUR VISION

AVR Manufacturers' mission is to help our customers in providing high quality precision

components at competitive cost. When the reputation and success depend on consistency and

quality of products and services

Our products comprise certain features which have made us a preferred company to work

with. Some of the highlighting features are:

                  - Cost effective

                  - Long lasting service

                  - Well tested

                  - Made from premium quality raw material 

                  - Rust resistant

21

Page 22: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

                  - Closely monitored by experienced professionals

 

Our products are available in different dimensions and designs. They are manufactured from

quality raw material and are technologically advanced. Some of the industries where our

products are used are:

             -  Automobile industries

             -  Textile machineries manufacturing

             -  General Engineering

             -  Electrical Panel manufacturing

             -  Transformer manufacturing

             -  Valves manufacturing

             -  Switch gear manufacturing

POLICY

To satisfy our clients, we consistently put our generous efforts to provide quality

range of components and timely services to our clients. We make use of latest technology and

advanced techniques to work effectively even in fluctuating market conditions.

Our cost-effective specialties with the help of latest technology, we manufacture these

components and panel boxes in most efficient manner. This helps us in efficient utilization of

recourses and manufacturing quality range of products. Further, this also reduces the

production cost and enables us to offer these products at highly competitive prices.

 

Some of these facilities are : 

- On Time Delivery (OTD)

- Efficient operations with economical machines

- Open cost system to customer

22

Page 23: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

- Hour rates for work center Systematic cost evaluation

- Operation wise actual production timings

- Wastage and scrap value deduction from cost

  Customization:

With the help of our experienced team of professionals, we offer customization facility to our

clients. We manufacture these components and assemblies in various designs and sizes to

meet the specified requirements of our clients.

 Quality Policy:

We have qualified people for inspection of components who keep a strict check on the quality

of the raw materials being procured as well as on the manufacturing process of the products.

Further, we ensure to check our products at various stage of manufacturing like :

Raw Material test

Dimensional measurements during production

Hardness tests

Finished test like Plating & Powder coating

Final Inspection as per client requirements

23

Page 24: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

OUR INFRASTRUCTURE :

With the support of our robust infrastructure, we successfully cater to the needs of our

reputed clients. Our sound infrastructure is spread over a vast area of 10,000 square feet,

which enables us to meet with the bulk of orders within set time frame. 

Our well equipped Infrastructure includes the following machineries :

Lathe Machine

Welding Machine

Mechanical Power Presses

Surface Grinding machine

Fly Press

Drilling Machine

Round bar/Pin cutting machine

Testing & inspection Equipment

 

24

Page 25: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

PRODUCTS

Products Range :

Sheet Metal Components for Automotive industries

Sheet metal assemblies Deep Drawn Parts Pressed parts for Automotive industries

Metallic Gaskets        Metal Inserts Electrical Switch Parts Automotive Jack Parts Special type Washers Fine Blanked Components

Product Features :

Long service life Temperature resistant Durable  Corrosion resistant Dimensionally accurate

25

Page 26: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

PRODUCT PHOTOS

26

Page 27: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

CLIENTS:

As a customer-centric organization, we consistently strive hard to offer the finest quality

products at industry leading prices to our clients. To meet the unique needs of our clients, we

offer a highly customized range of automobile components. Based on our ethical business

policy, customized product range, transparent dealings, and ability to deliver any size

consignment within promised time frame, we have garnered a huge clientele.

27

Page 28: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

CONTACT US

AVR MANUFACTURERS

72, 5th Cross Street,

Thiru-Vi-Ka Industrial Estate,

Guindy ,

Chennai.

Tamilnadu – 600 032

Ph: 044 – 43322527

[email protected]

28

Page 29: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

CHAPTER III

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Asset & Liability Management is the management of assets that are current in nature. Current

assets, by accounting definition are the assets normally converted in to cash in a period of one

year. Hence Asset & Liability Management can be considered as the management of cash,

market securities receivable, inventories and current liabilities. In fact, the management

of current assets is similar to that of fixed assets the sense that is both in cases the firm

analyses their effect on its profitability and risk factors, hence they differ on three major

aspects:

1. In managing fixed assets, time is an important factor discounting and compounding aspects

of time play an important role in capital budgeting and a minor part in the management

of current assets.

2. The large holdings of current assets, especially cash, may strengthen the firm’s liquidity

position, but is bound to reduce profitability of the firm as ideal car yield nothing.

3. The level of fixed assets as well as current assets depends upon the expected sales, but it is

only current assets that add fluctuation in the short run to a business.

To understand working capital better we should have basic knowledge about the various

aspects of working capital. To start with, there are two concepts of working capital:

Gross Working Capital

Net working Capital

Gross Working Capital: Gross working capital, which is also simply known as working

capital, refers to the firm’s investment in current assets: Another aspect of gross working

capital points out the need of arranging funds to finance the current assets. The gross working

capital concept focuses attention on two aspects of current assets management, firstly

optimum investment in current assets and secondly in financing the current assets. These two

aspects will help in remaining away from the two danger points of excessive or inadequate

investment in current assets. Whenever a need of working capital funds arises due to increase

in level of business activity or for any other reason the arrangement should be made quickly,

29

Page 30: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

and similarly if some surpluses are available, they should not be allowed to lie ideal but

should be put to some effective use. 

Net Working Capital: The term net working capital refers to the difference between the

current assets and current liabilities. Net working capital can be positive as well as negative.

Positive working capital refers to the situation where current assets exceed current liabilities

and negative working capital refers to the situation where current liabilities exceed current

assets. The net working capital helps in comparing the liquidity of the same firm over time.

For purposes of the Asset & Liability Management, therefore Working Capital can be said to

measure the liquidity of the firm. In other words, the goal of Asset & Liability Management

is to manage the current assets and liabilities in such a way that a acceptable level of net

working capital is maintained.

Working capital refers to the investment by the company in short

terms assets such as cash, marketable securities. Net current assets or net

working capital refers to the current assets less current liabilities.

Symbolically, it means,

Net Current Assets = Current Assets Current Liabilities.

Studies adopting a new approach towards Asset & Liability Management are reviewed

here.

Sagan in his paper (1955),

1 perhaps the first theoretical paper on the theory of Asset & Liability Management,

emphasized the need for management of working capital accounts and warned that it could

vitally affect the health of the company. He realized the need to build up a theory of Asset &

Liability Management. He discussed mainly the role and functions of money manager

inefficient working capital 48 management. Sagan pointed out the money manager’s

operations were primarily in the area of cash flows generated in the course of business

transactions. However, money manager must be familiar with what is being done with the

30

Page 31: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

control of inventories, receivables and payables because all these accounts affect cash

position. Thus, Sagan concentrated mainly on cash component of working capital. Sagan

indicated that the task of money manager was to provide funds as and when needed and to

invest temporarily surplus funds as profitably as possible in view of his particular

requirements of safety and liquidity of funds by examining the risk and return of various

investment opportunities. He suggested that money manager should take his decisions on the

basis of cash budget and total current assets position rather than on the basis of traditional

working capital ratios. This is important because efficient money manager can avoid

borrowing from outside even when his net working capital position is low. The study pointed

out that there was a need to improve the collection of funds but it remained silent about the

method of doing it. Moreover, this study is descriptive without any empirical support.

Realizing the dearth of pertinent literature on Asset & Liability Management, Walker in his

study (1964)

2 made a pioneering effort to develop a theory of Asset & Liability Management by

empirically testing, though partially, three propositions based on risk-return trade-off of Asset

& Liability Management. Walker studied the effect of the change in the level of working

capital on the rate of return in nine industries for the year 1961 and found the relationship

between the level of working capital and the rate of return to be negative.

Vanhorne in his study (1969)4 ,

Recognizing Asset & Liability Management as an area largely lacking in theoretical

perspective, attempted to develop a framework in terms of probabilistic cash budget for

evaluating decisions concerning 51the level of liquid assets and the maturity composition of

debt involving risk-return trade-off. He proposed calculation of different forecasted liquid

asset requirements along with their subjective probabilities under different possible

assumptions of sales, receivables, payables and other related receipts and disbursements. He

suggested preparing a schedule showing, under each alternative of debt maturity, probability

distributions of liquid asset balances for future periods, opportunity cost, maximum

probability of running out of cash and number of future periods in which there was a chance

of cash stock-out. Once the risk and opportunity cost for different alternatives were

estimated, the form could determine the best alternative by balancing the risk of running out

of cash against the cost of providing a solution to avoid such a possibility depending on

31

Page 32: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

management’s risk tolerance limits. Thus, Vanhorne study presented a risk-return trade-off of

Asset & Liability Management in entirely new perspective by considering some of the

variables probabilistically. However, the usefulness of the framework suggested by Vanhorne

is limited because of the difficulties in obtaining information about the probability

distributions of liquid-asset balances, the opportunity cost and the probability of running out

of cash for different alternative of debt maturities.

Welter, in his study (1970)

Stated that working capital originated because of the global delay between the moment

Expenditure for purchase of raw material was made and the moment when payments were

received for the sale of finished 52product. Delay centers are located throughout the

production and marketing functions. The study requires specifying the delay centers and

working capital tied up in each delay centre with the help of information regarding average

delay and added value. He recognized that by more rapid and precise information through

computers and improved professional ability of management, saving through reduction of

working capital could be possible by reducing the length of global delay by rescuing and/or

favorable redistribution of this global delay among the different delay centers. However,

better information and improved staff involve cost. Therefore, savings through reduction of

working capital should be tried till these saving are greater or equal to the cost of these

savings. Thus, this study is concerned only with return aspect of Asset & Liability

Management ignoring risk. Enterprises, following this approach, can adversely affect its

short-term liquidity position in an attempt to achieve saving through reduction of working

capital. Thus, firms should be conscious of the effect of law current assets on its ability to

pay-off current liabilities. Moreover, this approach concentrated only on total amount of

current assets ignoring the interactions between current assets and current liabilities.

Lambrix and Singhvi (1979)

Adopting the working capital cycle approach to the Asset & Liability Management, also

suggested that investment in working capital could be optimized and cash flows could be

improved by reducing the time frame of the physical flow from receipt of raw material to

shipment of 53finished goods, i.e. inventory management, and by improving the terms on

which firm sells goods as well as receipt of cash. However, the further suggested that

32

Page 33: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

working capital investment could be optimized also (1) by improving the terms on which

firms bought goods i.e. creditors and payment of cash, and (2) by eliminating the

administrative delays i.e. the deficiencies of paper-work flow which tended to extend the

time-frame of the movement of goods and cash.

Warren and Shelton (1971)7

Applied financial simulation to simulate future financial statements of a firm, based on a set

of simultaneous equations. Financial simulation approach makes it possible to incorporate

both the uncertainty of the future and the many interrelationships between current assets,

current liabilities and other balance sheet accounts. The strength of simulation as a tool of

analysis is that it permits the financial manager to incorporate in his planning both the most

likely value of an activity and the margin of error associated with this estimate. Warren and

Shelton presented a model in which twenty simultaneous equations were used to forecast

future balance sheet of the firm including forecasted current assets and forecasted current

liabilities. Current assets and current liabilities were forecasted in aggregate by directly

relating to firm sales. However, individual working capital accounts can also be forecasted in

a larger simulation system. Moreover, future financial statements can be simulated over a

range of different assumptions to portray inherent uncertainty of the future.

Cohn and Pringle in their study (1973)9

Illustrated the extension of Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)10 for Asset & Liability

Management decisions. They tried to interrelate long-term investment and financing

decisions and Asset & Liability Management decisions through CAPM. They emphasized

that an active Asset & Liability Management policy based on CAPM could be employed to

keep the firm’s shares in a given risk class. By risk, he meant unsystematic risk, the only risk

deemed relevant by CAPM. Owing to the lumpy nature for long-term financial decisions, the

firm is continually subject to shifts in the risk of its equity. The fluid nature of working

capital, on the other hand, can be exploited so as to offset or moderate such swings. For

example they suggested that a policy using CAPM could be adopted for the management of

marketable securities portfolio such that the appropriate risk level at any point in time was

that which maintains the risk of the company’s common stock at a constant level. Similarly,

Copeland and Khoury (1980) applied CAPM to develop a theory of credit expansion. They

argued that credit should be extended only if the expected rate of return on credit is greater

33

Page 34: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

than or equal to market determined required rate of return. They used CAPM to determine the

required rate of return for the firm with its new risk, arising from uncertainty regarding

collection due to the extension of credit. Thus, these studies show how CAPM can be used

for decisions involved in Asset & Liability Management. 55 One more approach, used mainly

in empirical studies, towards Asset & Liability Management has been to apply regression

analysis to determine the factors influencing investment in working capital. Different studies

in the past have considered different explanatory variables to explain the investment in

inventory. A brief review12 of these studies is important as regression equation of investment

in working capital, in the present study, would be formulated on the basis of works on

investment in inventory. In inventory investment literature, there is basically one school of

thought according to which firms aim at an optimum or desired stock of inventories in

relation to a given level of output/sales. This is known as acceleration principle. Pioneering

work in this field has been done by Metzler (1941)13.

However, his work was mainly on simple acceleration principle which postulated that firms

liked to maintain inventories in proportions to output/sales and they succeeded in achieving

the desired level of inventories in a unit time period. That is to say, any discrepancy between

the actual level and desired level of inventories is adjusted within the same time-period.

Needless to say, that such an instantaneous adjustment is not a realistic assumption to make.

Modifications, therefore, have been introduced in the literature to provide for partial

adjustment. Goodwin (1948)14 assumed that firms attempted only a partial adjustment of the

discrepancy between the desired stocks as determined by the level of output and the existing

stock.

Similarly, Darling and 56Lovell (1965)15 modified Metzler’s formulation based on simple

acceleration principle and obtained, the relationship based on flexible accelerator principle.

There are several reasons physical, financial and technical those motivate partial adjustment.

Among the physical factors, mention may be made of procurement lags between orders and

deliveries. The length of such lags is connected with the source of supply, foreign or

domestic availability. Import licensing procedures on account of foreign exchange scarcity

could cause further delays in adjustment. Among the financial factors, cost advantages

associated with bulk buying and higher procurement costs for speedy delivery are also

mentioned. Uncertainties in the market for raw materials and in the demand for final product

also play a role in influencing the speed of adjustment. Technically, firms like to make sure

34

Page 35: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

that changes in demand are of a permanent character before making full adjustment. The

acceleration principle has great relevance in inventory analysis than in the analysis of fixed

investment, as there are limits to liquidate fixed capital in the face of declining demand.

Other variables influencing inventories have been introduced in the literature in the context of

accelerator model. Rate of interest is used as a proxy for the opportunity cost of carrying

stocks or as a measure of the cost of funds needed to hold inventories. It has been found

significant in the studies of Hilton (1976)16 and Irwin (1981)17

. Time-trend is expected to be important because inventories generally accumulate with the

expansion of economic activities of the company. Anticipated 57price changes, measured by

changes in wholesale price index of inventories, are taken as an explanatory variable to

capture speculative element in inventory. This suggests a positive relationship between price

changes and inventory. An increase in sales is expected to increase the demand for stocks to

meet orders regularly. An increase in capacity utilization is also expected to increase the

demand for stock by increasing the demand for raw materials and increasing the inventories

of finished goods. Thus, the variable, capacity utilization, is postulated to have a positive

coefficient in the equation.

Abramowitz (1950)18 and Modigliani (1957)19

Highlighted the impact of capacity utilization on inventory investment. Existing stock of

inventories is expected to take account of adjustment process to the desired levels. Thus the

variable, existing stock of inventories, is postulated to be negatively related with the desired

stock. The ratio of inventory to sales may affect inventory investment positively because a

high ratio of stocks to sales in the past suggests the maintenance of high levels of inventories

in the past and thus also calling for high investment in inventories in the current period.

The studies of Metzler (1941)20 and Hilton (1976)21

Have found this variable, inventory-sales ratio, to be statistically significant. Fixed

investment is generally expected to affect inventory investment inversely because of

competing demand for the limited funds. However, in case of an expanding firm, the two

components may be complementary. Besides, availability of funds from retained earnings

and external sources, may affect investment 58decision by providing funds for financing

35

Page 36: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

inventory investment. Therefore, retained earnings and flow of debt are postulated to have

positive coefficients.

CHAPTER IV

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

4.1 NEED FOR THE STUDY

1. To provide reliable financial information about economic resources and obligation of a

business firm.

2. To provide other needed information about charges in such economic resources and

obligation.

3. To provide reliable information about change in net resources (recourses less obligations)

missing out of business activities.

4. To provide financial information that assets in estimating the learning potential of the

business.

4.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

Study of the Asset & Liability Management is important because unless the working

capital is managed effectively, monitored efficiently planed properly and reviewed

periodically at regular intervals to remove bottlenecks if any, the company cannot earn profits

and increase its turnover. With this primary objective of the study, the following further

objectives are framed for a depth analysis.

1. To study the Asset & Liability Management of AVR MANUFACTURERS., Chennai

2. To study the optimum level of current assets and current liabilities of the company.

3. To study the liquidity position through various working capital related ratios.

4. To study the financial performance using trend analysis tool

36

Page 37: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

4.3 SCOPE & LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

The scope of the study is identified after and during the study. The study of working capital

is based on tools like Trend Analysis, Ratio Analysis, working capital leverage, operating

cycle etc. Further the study is based on last 5 years Annual Reports of AVR

MANUFACTURERS. And even factors like competitor’s analysis, industry analysis were

not considered while preparing this project.

4.4 Limitations of the study

Following limitations were encountered while preparing this project:

1) Limited data:-

This project has completed with annual reports; it just constitutes one part of data

collection i.e. secondary. There were limitations for primary data collection because of

confidentiality.

2) Limited period:-

This project is based on five year annual reports. Conclusions and recommendations

are based on such limited data. The trend of last five year may or may not reflect the real

working capital position of the company

3) Limited area:-

Also it was difficult to collect the data regarding the competitors and their financial

information. Industry figures were also difficult to get.

37

Page 38: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

Research Methodology

4.4) Introduction

Research methodology is a way to systematically solve the research problem. It may

be understood as a science of studying now research is done systematically. In that various

steps, those are generally adopted by a researcher in studying his problem along with the

logic behind them.

It is important for research to know not only the research method but also know

methodology. “The procedures by which researcher goes about their work of describing,

explaining and predicting phenomenon are called methodology” Methods comprise the

procedures used for generating, collecting and evaluating data. All this means that it is

necessary for the researcher to design his methodology for his problem as the same may

differ from problem to problem.

Data collection is important step in any project and success of any project will be

largely depend upon now much accurate you will be able to collect and how much time,

money and effort will be required to collect that necessary data, this is also important step.

Data collection plays an important role in research work. Without proper data available for

analysis you cannot do the research work accurately.

4.4.1 RESEARCH DESIGN

The research design has been considered as a "blueprint" for research, dealing with

at least four problems: what questions to study, what data are relevant, what data to collect,

and how to analyze the results.

RESEARCH DESIGN USED IN THE STUDY

In analytical research, the researcher has to use facts or information already available,

and analyze these to make a critical evaluation of the material.

4.4.2) Types of data collection

38

Page 39: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

There are two types of data collection methods available.

1. Primary data collection

2. Secondary data collection

1) Primary data

The primary data is that data which is collected fresh or first hand, and for first time

which is original in nature. Primary data can collect through personal interview, questionnaire

etc. to support the secondary data.

2) Secondary data collection method

The secondary data are those which have already collected and stored. Secondary data

easily get those secondary data from records, journals, annual reports of the company etc. It

will save the time, money and efforts to collect the data. Secondary data also made available

through trade magazines, balance sheets, books etc.

This project is based on primary data collected through personal interview of head of

account department, and other concerned staff member of finance department. But primary

data collection had limitations such as matter confidential information thus project is based

on secondary information collected through five years annual report of the company,

supported by various books and internet sides. The data collection was aimed at study of

Asset & Liability Management of the company

Project is based on

1. Annual report of AVR MANUFACTURERS, 2008

2. Annual report of AVR MANUFACTURERS, 2009

3. Annual report of AVR MANUFACTURERS, 2010

4. Annual report of AVR MANUFACTURERS, 2011

5. Annual report of AVR MANUFACTURERS, 2012

39

Page 40: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

CHAPTER V

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETAITION

WORKING CAPITAL ANALYSIS

Asset & Liability Management is concerned with the problems which arise in

attempting to manage the current assets, the current liabilities and the inter relationship that

exist between them. The term current assets refers to those assets which in ordinary course of

business can be, or, will be, turned in to cash within one year without undergoing a

diminution in value and without disrupting the operation of the firm. The major current assets

are cash, marketable securities, account receivable and inventory. Current liabilities ware

those liabilities which intended at their inception to be paid in ordinary course of business,

within a year, out of the current assets or earnings of the concern. The basic current liabilities

are account payable, bill payable, bank over-draft, and outstanding expenses.

The goal of Asset & Liability Management is to manage the firm s current

assets and current liabilities in such way that the satisfactory level of working capital is

mentioned. The current should be large enough to cover its current liabilities in order to

ensure a reasonable margin of the safety.

The consideration of the level investment in current assets should avoid two danger

points excessive and inadequate investment in current assets. Investment in current assets

should be just adequate, not more or less, to the need of the business firms. Excessive

investment in current assets should be avoided because it impairs the firm s profitability, as

40

Page 41: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

idle investment earns nothing. On the other hand inadequate amount of working capital can

be threatened for the solvency of the firms because of its inability to meet its current

obligation. It should be realized that the working capital need of the firms may be fluctuating

with changing business activity. This may cause excess or shortage of working capital

frequently. The management should be prompt to initiate an action and correct imbalance

5.1 SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN WORKING CAPITAL

TABLE 5.1

PARTICULARS

2008

AMOUNT

Rs.

2009

AMOUNT

Rs.

INCREASE

AMOUNT

Rs.

DECREASE

AMOUNT

Rs.

ASSETS:

CURRENT ASSETS

Inventory (ERP Software

Licenses)2,50,940

8,25,100 5,74,160 -

Sundry Debtors 12,63,430 15,90,440 3,27,010

Cash & Bank Balance 15,90,440 58,400 - 15,32,040

Loans and Advances 22,86,750 36,86,400 13,99,650

Prepaid Expenses 14,65013,730 - 920

Accrued Income 59,090 42,925 16,165

TOTAL CURRENT

ASSETS54,65,300 62,04,638 23,00,820 15,49,125

41

Page 42: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

LESS:

CURRENT

LIABILITIES

Sundry Creditors 64,53,315 69,10,610 - 4,57,295

TOTAL CURRENT

LIABILITIES 64,53,315 69,10,610 - 4,57,295

NET WORKING

CAPITAL (9,88,015) (7,05,972) 23,00,820 10,91,830

INFERENCE:

Working capital is required to finance day to day operations of a firm. There should

be an optimum level of working capital. From the above calculations it is clearly found that

the company’s working capital is not at the best level. The current assets are lesser than the

liabilities.

42

Page 43: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

5.2 SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN WORKING CAPITAL

TABLE 5.2

PARTICULARS

2009

AMOUNT

Rs.

2010

AMOUNT

Rs.

INCREASE

AMOUNT

Rs.

DECREASE

AMOUNT

Rs.

ASSETS:

CURRENT ASSETS

Inventory 8,25,100

5,42,920

2,82,180

Sundry Debtors 15,90,440 30,93,060 15,02,620

Cash & Bank Balance 58,400 6,05,030 5,46,630

Loans and Advances 36,86,400 31,92,231 4,94,169

Prepaid Expenses 13,730 17,022 3,292

Accrued Income 42,925 96,426 53,501

TOTAL CURRENT

ASSETS

62,16,995 75,46,689 21,06,043 7,76,349

43

Page 44: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

LESS:

CURRENT

LIABILITIES

Sundry Creditors 69,10,610 1,46,42,090 - 77,31,480

TOTAL CURRENT

LIABILITIES 69,10,610

1,46,42,090 - 77,31,480

NET WORKING

CAPITAL

(7,05,972) (70,95,401) 21,06,043 (69,55,131)

INFERENCE:

In the above the working capital is negative due to more fluctuations in inventory and

loans. The company has borrowed more from outsiders for their purchase of fixed asset. The

creditors are increased at a very high rate that causes the company for many bad debts. More

care should be taken to avoid such fluctuations in the later years.

44

Page 45: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

5.3 SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN WORKING CAPITAL

TABLE 5.3

PARTICULARS

2010

AMOUNT

Rs.

2011

AMOUNT

Rs.

INCREASE

AMOUNT

Rs.

DECREASE

AMOUNT

Rs.

ASSETS:

CURRENT ASSETS

Inventory 5,42,920 9,50,310 4,07,390

Sundry Debtors 30,93,060 44,31,190 13,38,130

Cash & Bank Balance 6,05,030 3,71,375 2,33,655

Loans and Advances 31,92,231 33,71,511 1,79,280

Prepaid Expenses 17,0223,11,020

2,93,998

Accrued Income 96,42623,160

73,266

Advance Tax 2,26,385 2,26,385 -

TOTAL CURRENT

ASSETS

75,46,689 96,84,951 24,45,183 3,06,921

45

Page 46: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

LESS:

CURRENT

LIABILITIES

Sundry Creditors 1,46,42,090 93,96,631 52,45,459 -

TOTAL CURRENT

LIABILITIES

1,46,42,090 93,96,631 52,45,459 -

NET WORKING

CAPITAL

(70,95,401) 2,88,320 (28,00,276) 3,06,921

INFERENCE:

The company has an increased level in the year 2011. This is due to the control on

creditors. And increase in the inventory and loans. Moreover the company has to take a

special attention over this varying working capital.

46

Page 47: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

5.4 SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN WORKING CAPITAL

TABLE 5.4

PARTICULARS

2011

AMOUNT

Rs.

2012

AMOUNT

Rs.

INCREASE

AMOUNT

Rs.

DECREASE

AMOUNT

Rs.

ASSETS:

CURRENT ASSETS

Inventory 9,50,310 47,08,450 37,58,140 -

Sundry Debtors 44,31,190 30,66,220 - 13,64,970

Cash & Bank Balance 3,71,375 9,25,410 5,54,035

Loans and Advances 33,71,511 - - 33,71,511

Advance Tax 3,11,020 5,89,870 2,78,850 -

Prepaid Expenses

23,160

1,43,770 1,20,610 --

Accrued Income 2,26,385 1,69,830 - 56,555

TOTAL CURRENT

ASSETS

96,84,951 96,03,550 47,11,635 47,93,036

47

Page 48: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

LESS:

CURRENT

LIABILITIES

Sundry Creditors 93,96,631 60,53,015 33,43,616 -

TOTAL CURRENT

LIABILITIES

93,96,631 60,53,015 33,43,616 -

NET WORKING

CAPITAL

2,88,320) 35,50,535 13,68,019 47,93,036

INFERENCE:

It can be clearly inferred that the company has a fluctuating working capital. This

means that the management is not making a good attention to the flow of funds. The

company’s working capital for the year 2012 is again decreased at a very low rate this is due

to more Bad debts. Although the company has improved to an extent by decreasing its

liabilities.

48

Page 49: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

5.2 RATIO ANALYSIS

5.2 MEANING OF RATIO:

A ratio is a mathematical relationship between two items expressed in a

quantitative form. Ratio can be defined as “Relationship expressed kin quantitative terms

between figures which have cause and effect relationship which are connected with each

other in some manner or the other.

DEFINITION OF RATIO:

According to Accountant’s Hand Book by Wixon, Kell and Bedford, a

Ratio” Is an expression of the quantitative relationship between two numbers.

LIQUIDITY RATIOS:

It measures the ability of a company to meet its current obligations, and indicate

the short term financial stability of the company. The parties interested in the liquid ratio

would be employees, bankers and short-term creditors.

CURRENT RARIO:

49

Page 50: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

Current Ratio may be defined as the ratio of Current Assets to Current Liabilities.

It is also known as Working Capital Ratio 2:1 ratio. Current Ratio shows the relationship

between total current assets and total current liabilities expressed as a formula.

Current Assets

CURRENT RATIO =

Current Liabilities

QUICK RATIO:

A measure of company’s liquidity and ability to meet its obligations, Quick ratio,

often referred to as acid-test ratio, is obtained by subtracting inventories from current assets

and then dividing by current liabilities. Quick ratio is viewed as a sign of company’s financial

strength or weakness (higher number means stronger, lower number means weaker).

Liquid/Quick assets

QUICK RATIO =

Current Liabilities

ABSOLUTE LIQUIDITY RATIO:

This is also known as super Quick Ratio (or) Cash Ratio. This ratio

considers only absolute liquidity available with the firm. Absolute Liquid assets include cash

in hand, cash at bank marketable securities. A standard of 0.5: 1 absolute liquidity ratio is

considered an acceptable norm. It is calculated as follows:

Cash & Bank Balances

ABSOLUTE LIQUIDITY RATIO =

50

Page 51: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

Current Liabilities

INVENTORY TURNOVER RATIO:

Inventory Turnover Ratio also known as stock turnover ratio in the

traditional language; usually establishes relationship between the cost of goods sold during a

given period and the average amount of Inventory outstanding during that period. Inventory

Turnover Ratio can be calculated by of the following formula:

Net Sales

INVENTORY TURNOVER RATIO =

Average Inventory

DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO:

Receivables (or) Debtors normally include both debtors and Bill

Receivable and represent the uncollected portion of Credit sales receivables constitute an

important component of Current Assets and therefore the quality of receivables to a great

extent determines the liquidity of a firm. This Ratio can be calculated as follows:

Credit Sales

DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO =

Debtor

CREDITORS TURNOVER RATIO:

This Ratio is similar to receivable turnover ratio. It compares the

Accounts Payable with the total credit purchases. It signifies the credit period enjoyed by the

firm in paying creditors. Accounts payable include both sundry creditors and bills payable. It

is calculated as follows:

Net Purchase

CREDITORS TURNOVER RATIO =

Average creditors

51

Page 52: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

FIXED ASSET TURNOVER RATIO:

This ratio indicates the extent to which the investment in fixed assets

contributes towards sales. If compared with a previous period, it indicates whether the

investment in fixed assets has been judicious or not, the Ratio is calculated as follows:

Sales

FIXED ASSET TURNOVER RATIO =

Net Fixed Assets

WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO:

A measurement comparing the depletion of working capital to the generation

of sales over a given period, this provides some useful information as to how effectively a

company is using its working capital to generate sales.

Net Sales

WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO=

Net Working Capital

CASH TO CURRENT ASSET RATIO:

The cash asset ratio is similar to the current ratio, except that the current

ratio includes current assets such as inventories in the numerator. Some analysts believe that

including current assets makes it difficult to convert them into usable funds for debt

obligations. The cash asset ratio is a much more accurate measure of a firm's liquidity

Cash

CASH TO CURRENT ASSET RATIO=

Current Assets

CURRENT ASSET TURNOVER RATIO:

52

Page 53: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

The ratio is calculated to ascertain the efficiency of use of current

assets of the concerns. With an increase in sales, current assets are expected to increase.

However, an increase in the ratio shows that current assets turned over faster resulting in

higher sales for a given investment in current assets. Higher ratio is generally an index of

better efficiency and profitability of the concern. This ratio gives a general impression about

the adequacy of working capital in reaction to sales.

Sales

CURRENT ASSET TURNOVER RATIO=

Current Assets

INVENTORY TO SALES RATIO:

Inventory to Sales Ratio indicates the manner in which a firm’s inventory in

turning. The inventory to sales ratio indicates the efficiency with which inventory turnover

into sales.

Inventory

INVENTORY TO SALES RATIO=

Sales

INVENTORY TO CURRETN ASSETS RATIO:

It indicates the amount of inventory in Current Assets. Any increase

amount of inventory indicates the lower liquidity as compared to the other Current Assets.

Average Inventory

INVENTOTY TO CURRENT ASSETS RATIO=

Current Assets

DEBT UTILIZATION RATIOS

53

Page 54: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

The debt utilization ratio measures the proportion of debt and low

efficiently management used the debt capital. The higher the ratio, the greater the amount

other people’s money being used in an attempt to generate profits

DEBT RATIO:

The Debt Ratio measures the proportion of total assets financed by the time’s

creditor. The lighter the ratio the greater the amount other people’s money being used in an

attempt to generate profits, the ratio is calculated as follows,

Total Liability

DEBT RATIO=

Total Assets

PROFITABILITY RATIOS:

These measures the overall effectiveness in terms of returns generated, with

profits being related to sales and adequacy of such profits as to sales or investment. The

profitability ratios are important to internal management, to bankers, to investors, and to the

owners.

GROSS PROFIT RATIO:

Gross Profit Ratio expresses the relationship of gross profit of sales to net sales

in terms of percentage, representing the percentage of gross profit earned on sales.

Gross Profit

GROSS PROFIT RATIO= *100

Net Sales

ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES RATIO:

54

Page 55: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

This Ratio is also known as supporting ratio’s operating ratio. They

indicate the efficiency with which business as a whole functions. It is better for the concern to

known how it is able to save or waste over expenditure in respect of different items of

expenses. Therefore each aspect of cost of sales & operation expenses are analyzed.

Administrative Expenses Ratio

ADMINISTRATIVEEXPENSESRATIO= *100

Net Sales

5.2.1 CURRENT RATIO:

Current Asset

CURRENT RATIO =

Current Liabilities

TABLE 5.2.1

INTERPRETATION:

55

YEAR CURRENT ASSETS

Rs

CURRENT LIABILTIES

Rs

RATIO

2008 54,65,300 64,53,315 0.85

2009 62,04,638 69,10,610 0.90

2010 70,06,659 1,46,42,090 0.48

2011 96,84,951 93,96,631 1.03

2012 96,03,550 60,53,015 1.59

Page 56: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

The Current Ratio measures the ability of the firm to meet its Current Liabilities.

The standard norms of Current Ratio are 2:1. From the above table it can be inferred that

the Current Ratio of AVR MANUFACTURERSPvt. Ltd Shows higher in the year 2012(i.e.)

1.59

CURRENT RATIO:

FIGURE 5.2.1

56

Page 57: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

5.2.2 QUICK RATIO:

Liquidi

ty Assets

Quick

Ratio =

Current Liabilities

Where as (Quick Assets = Current Assets - (Stock + Prepaid Expenses)

Table 5.2.2

57

YEARS QUICK ASSETS

Rs

CURRENT LIABILTIES

Rs

RATIOS

2008 36,92,880 64,53,315 0.57

2009 53,78,165 69,10,610 0.78

2010 69,86,747 1,46,42,090 0.48

2011 84,23,621 93,96,631 0.90

2012 34,72,361 60,53,015 0.57

Page 58: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

INTERPRETATION:

The Quick Ratio (or) Liquidity ratio gives a measure of Liquidity the expected

industry standard is 1:1. From the above table it can be inferred that the Quick Ratio of AVR

MANUFACTURERSPvt. Ltd fluctuating in trend from the year 2008 to 2012. The ratio has

been decreased in the current year due to higher current liabilities.

QUICK RATIO

FIGURE 5.2.2

58

Page 59: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

5.2.3 ABSOLUTE LIQUIDITY RATIO:

Cash & Bank Balances

Absolute Liquidity Ratio =

Current Liability

TABLE 5.2.3

YEARS

CASH & BANK BALANCE

Rs

CURRENT LIABILITIES

Rs RATIOS

200883,610 64,53,315 0.013

200958,400 69,10,610 0.008

20106,05,030 1,46,42,090 0.04

59

Page 60: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

20113,71,375 93,96,631 0.04

20129,25,410 60,53,015 0.15

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it can be inferred that the AVR MANUFACTURERSPvt. Ltd

has a high Absolute Liquidity Ratio in the year 2012 (i.e.) 0.15. The ratios are being in a

increasing position which means that the company has a good cash utilization. The ideal cash

position is .05:1. So the company’s cash position ratio is satisfactory.

ABSOLUTE LIQUIDITY RATIO

FIGURE 5.2.3

60

Page 61: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

5.2.4 INVENTORY TURNOVER RATIO:

Net Sales

Inventory Turnover Ratio =

Average Inventory

TABLE 5.2.4

YEAR

NET SALES

Rs

AVERAGE INVENTORY

Rs RATIO

2008 39377300 2,50,940 1.56

2009

57364800 8,25,100 0.69

61

Page 62: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

2010 63273350 5,42,920

1.16

2011 77237255 9,50,310

0.81

2012 89967680 47,08,450

0.19

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it can be inferred that the company’s

Inventory increase in year 2010 and get decreased in the next following years due to more

fluctuations in the sales.

INVENTORY TURN OVER RATIO:

FIGURE 4.2.4

62

Page 63: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

5.2.5 DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO:

Credit Sales

Debtors Turnover Ratio =

Debtors

TABLE 5.2.5

63

Page 64: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

YEAR CREDIT SALES

Rs

DEBTORS

Rs

RATIO

200839377260 12,63,430 0.31

200957364800 15,90,440 0.36

201063273345 30,93,060 0.20

201177237255 44,31,190 0.17

201289967680 30,66,220 0.29

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it can be inferred that the Debtors Turnover Ratio of

AVR MANUFACTURERSPvt. Ltd increase in the year 2008 to 2012 (i.e.) 0.31 to 0.29

shows high in the year 2009 (i.e.) 0.36 .When compare to previous years.

DEBTORS TURN OVER RATIO:

FIGURE 5.2.5

64

Page 65: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

5.2.6 CREDITORS TURNOVER RATIO:

Net Purchase

65

Page 66: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

Creditors Turnover Ratio =

Average Creditors

TABLE 5.2.6

YEAR

NET PURCHASE

Rs

AVERAGE CREDITORS

Rs RATIO

2008 34098755 64,53,315

5.28

2009 55053125 69,10,610

7.97

2010 56214265 1,46,42,090

3.84

2011 75714395 93,96,631

8.06

2012 77310590 60,53,015

12.77

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it can be inferred that the AVR MANUFACTURERSPvt.

Ltd company’s creditors turnover ratio in year 2008 to 2012 (i.e.) 5.28 to 12.77. The

company has decreased its creditors that make the ratio to increase.

CREDITORS TURNOVER RATIO:

FIGURE 4.2.6

66

Page 67: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

5.2.7 FIXED ASSET TURNOVER RATIO:

Sales

67

Page 68: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

Fixed Assets Turnover Ratio =

Net Fixed Assets

TABLE4.2.7

YEAR SALES

Rs

NET FIXED ASSETS

Rs

RATIO

200839377260 7340010 5.36

200957364800 9586730 5.98

201063273345 95,08,586 5.91

201177237255 12621370 6.11

201289967680 12664270 7.10

Source: Annual Reports AVR MANUFACTURERSPvt. Ltd, Chennai from 2005-10

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it can be inferred that the Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio of

AVR MANUFACTURERSPvt. Ltd, has increased by 6.11% in the year

FIXED ASSET TURNOVER RATIO:

FIGURE 4.2.7

68

Page 69: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

5.2.8 CASH TO CURRENT ASSET RATIO:

Cash

69

Page 70: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

Cash to Current Asset Ratio=

Current Assets

TABLE 5.2.8

YEAR CASH

Rs

CURRENT ASSET

Rs

RATIO

200883,610 64,53,315 0.01

200958,400 69,10,610 0.08

20106,05,030 1,46,42,090 0.004

20113,71,375 93,96,631 0.04

20129,25,410 60,53,015 0.15

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it can be inferred that the Ratio increase in the year 2008 to

2012 (i.e.) 0.01 to 0.15.The Cash to Current Asset Ratio shows higher in the year 2012 (i.e.)

0.15. this is due to increase in the cash balance and decrease in the sundry creditors.

CASH TO CURRENT ASSET RATIO:

FIGURE5.2.8

70

Page 71: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

5.2.9 CURRENT ASSET TURNOVER RATIO:

71

Page 72: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

Sales

Current Asset Turnover Ratio =

Current Assets

TABLE 5.2.9

YEAR SALES

Rs

CURRENT ASSETS

Rs

RATIO

2008 39377300 64,53,315 6.10

2009 57364800 69,10,610 8.3

2010 63273350 1,46,42,090 6.37

2011 77237255 93,96,631 8.21

2012 89967680 60,53,015 14.86

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it can be inferred that the Current Asset Turnover Ratio

of AVR MANUFACTURERSPvt. Ltd in year 2008 to 2012. It has been increased which

shows the satisfactory level of current asset correspondence to the sales in the subsequent

years and the ratio finally increases in the year 2012 (i.e.) 14.86 when compared to the

previous years

CURRENT ASSET TURNOVER RATIO:

FIGURE 5.2.9

72

Page 73: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

5.32.10 INVENTORY TO SALES RATIO:

Inventory

73

Page 74: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

Inventory to Sales Ratio=

Sales

TABLE 5.2.10

YEAR INVENTORY

Rs

SALES

Rs RATIO

2008 5825100 39377300 0.15

2009 5429251 57364800 0.09

2010 3880120 63273350 0.06

2011 9150310 77237255 0.11

2012 4708450 89967680 0.05

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it can be inferred that the Inventory to Sales Ratio of AVR

MANUFACTURERSPvt. Ltd.Has been increased in the year 2010 (i.e.) 0.11.When

compared to previous years. But I the year2011, the ratio have been fall down to 0.05.

INVENTORY TO SALES RATIO:

FIGURE 5.2.10

74

Page 75: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

5.2.11 WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO:

Net Working Capital

75

0.15

0.09

0.06

0.11

0.05

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

RATIOS

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

YEARS

INVENTORY TO SALES RATIO

RATIO

Page 76: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO =

Current Liabilities

TABLE 5.2.11

YEAR NET WORKING CAPITAL

Rs

CURRENT LIABILITIES

Rs

RATIO

2008 -988015 64,53,315 -0.15

2009 -705972 69,10,610 -0.10

2010 -7635431 1,46,42,090 -0.52

2011 288320 93,96,631 0.03

2012 3550535 60,53,015 0.59

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it can be inferred that the Working Capital Turnover Ratio of AVR

MANUFACTURERSPvt. Ltd. The Working Capital Turnover Ratio shows a negative ratio

in the first three years i.e.2008, 2009, 2010 . But on 2011 and 2012 there has been

continuously increase in the working capital due to decrease in the current liabilities.

WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIOS

FIGURE 5.2.15

76

Page 77: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

5.2.12 INVENTORY TO CURRE NT ASSET RATIO:

Average Inventory

77

Page 78: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

Inventory to Current Asset Ratio =

Current Assets

TABLE 5.2.12

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it can be inferred that the company’s Inventory to

Current Asset Ratio in the year 2008 to 2012. There is a fluctuating in this ratio. The highest

ratio is on 2009, 0.94 and get decreases and finally comes to 0.49

INVENTORY TO CURRENT ASSET RATIO

FIGURE 5.2.12

78

YEAR

AVERAGE INVENTORY

Rs

CURRENT ASSET

Rs RATIO

2008 582510054,65,300

1.06

2009 542925162,04,638

0.12

2010 388012070,06,659

4.94

2011 915031096,84,951

0.33

2012 470845096,03,550

0.49

Page 79: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

5.2.13 GROSS PROFIT RATIO:

Gross Profit

Gross Profit Ratio= * 100

79

Page 80: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

Net Sales

Where as (Gross Profit = Net Sales- Cost of Goods Sold)

Cost of Goods Sold = (Opening Stock+ Purchase Less Returns-Current

Liabilities)

Net Sales = (Sales- Sales Return).

TABLE 5.2. 13

YEAR GROSS PROFIT

Rs

CURRENT ASSET

Rs

RATIO

2008 3753500 54,65,300

0.68

2009 4172000 62,04,638

0.09

2010 5509950 70,06,659

0.70

2011 6793055 96,84,951

0.24

2012 8215230 96,03,550

0.86

GROSS PROFIT RATIO

80

Page 81: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

FIGURE 5.2.13

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it can be inferred that the company’s Gross Profit Ratio

increase in year 2005-06 (i.e.) 9.53. But from 2005-06 to 2011-10 there has been slowdown

to some extent, when comparing to the previous years.

5.2.14 ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES RATIO:

Administrative Expenses

Administrative Expenses Ratio= *100

81

Page 82: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

Net Sales

TABLE 5.2.14

YEAR

ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES RATIO

Rs NET SALES

Rs

RATIO

2008 6660620 39377300 16.91

2009 9805870 57364800 17.09

2010 11598640 63273350 18.33

2011 13919615 77237255 18.02

2012 14236375 89967680 15.82

INTERPRETATION:

From the above table it can be inferred that the company’s

Administrative Expenses Ratio in year 2008 to 2012 (i.e.) 16.91 to 15.82.has been increased

in the year 2008 (i.e.) 16.91. In the year 2012 the Administrative Expenses Ratio has been

decreased (i.e.) 15.82.When compared to previous years

ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES RATIO

FIGURE 5.2.14

82

Page 83: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

TREND ANALYSIS

5.3 MEANING TREND ANALYSIS:

83

16.9117.09

18.3318.02

15.82

14.5

15

15.5

16

16.5

17

17.5

18

18.5

RATIOS

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

YEARS

ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES RATIO

RATIO

Page 84: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

Trend analysis is one of the important tools of analyzing the financial

data. It computes the percentage changes for different variables over a long period and then

makes a comparative study of them. The trend percentage helps the analyst to study the

changes that have occurred darning the period. Such an analysis indicates the progress by

showing ups and downs in its activities

FINANCIAL TREND ANALYSIS is the process of analyzing financial statements of

a company for any continuing relationship. Generally, an analysis is made to find out what

direction a concern is going, how rapidly, and whether there are enough resources to

complete proposed projects.

An aspect of technical analysis that tries to predict the future movement of a stock based on

past data. Trend analysis is based on the idea that what has happened in the past gives traders

an idea of what will happen in the future. 

There are three main types of trends: short-, intermediate- and long-term.

CURRENT ASSET:

TABLE 5.3.1

YEAR

CURRENT ASSET

84

Page 85: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

(Y) X XY X2 Y = a + b x

200855,09,660

-2 -11019320 4 5153980.3

20094,43,54,495 -1 -4,43,54,495 1 6271271.8

201078,46,689 0 0 0 57,18,534

20112,78,84,951 1 2,78,84,951 1 9889807.5

201296,03,550 2 19207100 4 11838135

∑Y=36942826.5 ∑X=0 ∑XY=

11172925

∑X2=

10

Y = a + bX Where a = ∑Y ; b = ∑XY

n ∑X2

CURRENT ASSET:

FIGURE 5.3.1

85

Page 86: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

FIXED ASSET:

TABLE 5.3.2

86

Page 87: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

YEAR

FIXED ASSET

(Y) X XY X2 Y = a + b x

2008740010.600 -2 -1480021.2 4 845992.897

2009986728.600 -1 -986728.6 1 1094308.666

20101700745.121 0 0 0 1342624.435

20111621368.217 1 1621368.217 1 1590940.204

20121664269.636 2 3328539.272 4 1839255.973

∑Y=6713122.174 ∑X=0 ∑XY=2483157.689 ∑X2=10

Y = a + bX Where a = ∑Y ; b = ∑XY

n ∑X2

Fixed assets value for 2012 – 11 will be about Rs. 2, 08, 75,71.738

FIXED ASSET

FIGURE 5.3.2

87

Page 88: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

CASH & BANK BALANCE:

88

Page 89: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

YEAR CASH & BANK X XY X2 Y = a + b x

2008 58403.077 -2 -116806.154 4 210601.589

2009 605026.901 -1 -605026.901 1 360637.041

2010 593151.324 0 0 0 510672.493

2011 371374.749 1 371374.749 1 660707.945

2012 925406.415 2 1850812.83 4 810743.397

∑Y=2553362.466 ∑X=0 ∑XY=1500354.524 ∑X2=10

TABLE 5.3.3

Y = a + bX Where a = ∑Y ; b = ∑XY

n ∑X2

89

Page 90: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

CASH & BANK BALANCES

FIGURE 5.3.3

90

Page 91: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

INVENTORY

YEARS INVENTORY X XY X2 Y = a + b x

2008 5825092.799 -2 -11650185.6 4

3879602.726

2009

5429251.165 -1 -5429251.165 1

5649866.627

2010

3880115.603 0 0 0

5798643.734

2011 9150310.374 1 9150310.374 1

5947420.841

2012

4708448.732 2 9416897.464 4

6096197.948

∑Y=28993218.67 ∑X=0 ∑XY=1487771.073 ∑X2=10

TABLE 5.3.4

Y = a + bX Where a = ∑Y ; b = ∑XY

n ∑X2

INVENTORY

91

Page 92: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

FIGURE 4.3.4

SUNDRY DEBTORS

92

Page 93: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

TABLE 4.3.5

YEARS SUNDRY DEBTORS

(Y)

X XY X2 YC= a + b x

2008 1590439.776 -2 -3180879.552 4 1488553.358

2009 3093057.061 -1 -3093057.061 1 1917521.847

2010 2311550.508 0 0 0 2346490.336

2011 4431187.152 1 4431187.152 1 2775458.825

2012 3066217.179 2 6132434.358 4 3204427.314

∑Y=11732451.68 ∑X=0 ∑XY=4289684.897 ∑X2=10

Y = a + bX Where a = ∑Y ; b = ∑XY

n ∑X2

SUNDRY DEBTORS

FIGURE 5.3.5

93

Page 94: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

CHAPTER VI

94

Page 95: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

FINDINGS:

In the year of 2008, 2009 and 2010 shows increase in Working

Capital. This indicates that the company has ability of payment of

short-term Liability.

The fixed assets ratio indicates that the working capital of this

company is funded by long-term funds which indicate efficient funds

management.

The Short –term Liquidity and long- term Liquidity position of the

concern were studied to evaluate the Working Capital of the concern.

During the study period 2008 to 2012 the current ratio of the concern

varied from 8.63 to 2.21.But 2010 - 2011 is varied from 0.77 to 1.80.

This was much less than the prescribed of 2:1. The inference is that

the Current Liability may not be easily met out of Current Asset by

the Company.

The Quick ratio of the concern during the period 2008 - 2012 the

study is varied from 7.22 to 1.67.Which was much greater than the

prescribed standard of 1:1.So the company Liquidity level is

satisfactory.

In Trend analysis the Cash &Bank Balance have been increased from

2008 to 2011.So it shows the Cash position of the company is good.

CHAPTER VII

SUGGESTION:

95

Page 96: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

The company is a profit seeking one; it has to commit all of its

resources to achieve its goal. To achieve this, profitability, liquidity

and solvency position a crucial elements to be monitored carefully,

thereby the trade off can be reached

This company’s ability to meet its current obligations is satisfactory

though it does not meet the conventional norm. This company

maintains current liabilities more than the amount of current assets

which has to be viewed seriously and improvement of this ratio is

required to achieve the optimum level.

Stock Turnover Ratio should be maintained at the constant level.

The Cash & Bank Balances of the company is good.

Using trend analysis it can be suggested that the fixed assets curve

shows steady upward direction much than the current assets curve,

which enable us to understand the company’s funds are dumped in

fixed asset, it is not a favorable condition to the company

CHAPTER VIII

CONCLUTION

96

Page 97: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

The present study reveals that the liquidity position of this company is comparatively good

as it approaches the standard norms throughout the period of study. On the whole, it can be

concluded that the company’s overall risk evaluation process is not at desired level and the

author has made the realistic recommendation for the improvement in operational and

managerial efficiency of the company as to maintain and increase further by effective

utilization and control of all the assets.

CHAPTER IX

BIBILIOGRAPHY

97

Page 98: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

Management accounting - S.N.MAHESHWARY

Financial management - I.M.PANDEY

Research methodology - C.R.KOTHARI

Management accounting - R.S.N.PILLAI

&

BAGAVATHI

Web site:

www.google.com

www.finance.org

CONSOLIDATED BALANCESHEET AS ON 31ST MARCH 2008 TO 31ST MARCH 2012

98

Page 99: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

PARTICULARS 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

ASSETS:

CURRENT ASSETS:

a. Inventory2,50,940

8,25,100

5,42,920 9,50,310 47,08,450

b. Sundry Debtors12,63,430 15,90,440 30,93,060 44,31,190 30,66,220

c. Cash and Bank83,610 58,400 6,05,030 3,71,375 9,25,410

d. Prepaid

Expenses14,650

13,730 17,022 3,11,020 5,89,870

e. Accrued Income59,090 42,925 96,426 23,160

1,43,770

f. Advance tax - - -2,26,385 1,69,830

g. Loans and

Advances22,86,750 36,86,400 31,92,231 33,71,511 -

TOTAL CURRENT

ASSETS: 39,58,470 62,16,995 70,06,659 96,84,951 96,03,550

FIXED ASSET:

Fixed assets 73,40,010 95,86,730 95,08,586 1,26,21,370 1,26,64,270

TOTAL FIXED

ASSETS: 73,40,010 95,86,730 95,08,586 1,26,21,370 1,26,64,270

TOTAL ASSSET 1,12,98,480 1,58,03,725 1,65,15,245 2,23,06,321 2,22,67,820

LIABILITIES:

CURRENT

LIABILITIES:

99

Page 100: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

a. Sundry

Creditors64,53,315 69,10,610 1,46,42,090 93,96,631 60,53,015

RESERVES AND

SURPLUS:

Capital Reserves 7,50,000 10,50,000 - 1,00,00,000 1,00,00,000

General Reserve 15,00,000 25,00,000 15,00,000 15,00,000 15,00,000

UNSECURED

LOAN:

Fixed Deposit 3,50,000 3,50,000 3,50,000 3,50,000 3,50,000

Short term loan and

Advances

10,00,000 20,00,000 - 10,00,000 19,85,000

Other loans and

Advances

- 5,00,000 - - 3,00,000

PROVISIONS:

a. Provision of tax 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000

b. Provident Fund

Scheme

10,55,590 21,75,960 - - 20,00,000

c. Pensions,

Insurance,

Similar staff

benefits

1,65,000 2,90,000 - 30,000 50,005

d. Other

Provisions

4,575 7,155 3,155 9,690 9,800

100

Page 101: A Study on Asset & Liability Management in Avr Manufacturers (2)

TOTAL LIABILITIES 1,12,98,480 1,58,03,725 1,65,15,245 2,30,15,255 2,22,67,820

101