a study on civil engineering students perception …...a study on civil engineering students...
TRANSCRIPT
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 160 [email protected]
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 8, Issue 12, December 2017, pp. 160–174, Article ID: IJCIET_08_12_019
Available online at http://http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=8&IType=12
ISSN Print: 0976-6308 and ISSN Online: 0976-6316
© IAEME Publication Scopus Indexed
A STUDY ON CIVIL ENGINEERING STUDENTS
PERCEPTION TOWARDS DEMONETIZATION
IN GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
Dr. B.Kishore Babu
Associate professor, Department of Management, K L University, Vaddeswaram,
Guntur (AP), India
M.V.A.L. Narasimha Rao
Assistant Prof, Department of Management, K L University, Vaddeswaram,
Guntur (AP), India
ABSTRACT
The central government of India on November 2016 has announced
demonetization decision. The government has stated the demonetization objectives as
follows.1. Corruption frees India 2. To curtail black money 3.to reduces terrorism 4.
to control raising prices 5. To reduce terrorism by stopping funds flow to the terrorist
organizations. 6. To increase cashless transactions and to make a digital india.
This research consequently, is an effort to find out perceptions of the civil
engineering students about demonetization. A survey was conducted in Guntur,
Andhra Pradesh to understand civil engineering students’ perceptions on
demonetization. This research is an attempt to know the civil engineering students
perceptions towards the aims at the rear of the demonetization policy.
Materials and methods: A study was conducted at different civil engineering
colleges and universities of Guntur district of Andhra Pradesh. A questionnaire was
used to interview 200 individuals.
Results: About the demonetization majority of students are114 (57%) are
expressed that demonetization is good decision taken by central government to
strengthen Indian economy in future.
Conclusion: Most of the civil engineering students are aware of demonetization
and have positive perceptions towards to demonetization and students believe that
demonetization policy curtails terrorism, poverty and makes India a cashless society
and digital India.
Keywords: civil engineering students, Demonetization, perception, Black money
A Study on Civil Engineering Students Perception towards Demonetization in Guntur District, Andhra
Pradesh
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 161 [email protected]
Cite this Article: Dr. B.Kishore Babu and M.V.A.L. Narasimha Rao, A Study on
Civil Engineering Students Perception towards Demonetization in Guntur District,
Andhra Pradesh, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(12),
2017, pp. 160–174
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=8&IType=12
1. INTRODUCTION
Demonetization of currency means taking away of one country currency from circulation and
replacing with new currency. This is not the first time that India has demonetized its currency,
previously it was done in 1946 with the complete ban of thousand and ten thousand notes to
deal with the unaccounted money i.e. black money. Second time it was done in 1978 by
Morarji Desai, government. The main objective of this step is to reveal the black money, to
cut back corruption, fake currency as well as terror financing. This step is considered as the
biggest cleanliness drive against the black money in the history of Indian economy.3
The success or failure of any Government policy depends on the support of public
includes students, farmers, business people and employees etc. Students support is very much
required for the success or failure of policy. The support comes from perception of the
students towards policy. If the students have positive perceptions towards policy, whatever
the consequences they have to face, they face positively and encourage others to support
policy by educating the people and encourage the citizen to implement the policies of central
government. Civil engineering students who are technically sound about the construction at
the same time they are having knowledge about social changes that are taking place in and
around the society. Majority of the civil engineering students are aware about merits and
demerits of demonetization, consequences and objectives of demonetization. So Government
has to publicize the merits and positive consequences of demonetization and how it will
useful for the development of country
2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
(PradnyaSurwade)6 2017 study the effect of demonetization on every day Income, people's
expectations concerning currency etc. The study discloses problems faced by common
peoples with the use of online banking which are further analyzed and solution to this
problems are suggested to some extent, in turn to move towards cashless banking.
(Ajit omghyan)7
2017 has discussed the central government motives behind
demonetization and merits and demerits of demonetization elaborately and effects of
demonetization on economy has discussed
(Vishal guptha)8
2017 in his articles discussed the various objectives associated with
demonetization. In his article he discussed various unique methods for transforming black
money in to white one. He discussed the impact of demonetization on Indian economy with
number of examples like how demonetization impact on marriages, real estate sector, and
terror related funding activities and international relationships.
(By Deepak Jha)9 2017 in his article Demonetization: Does It Really Deserve Such A
Hype?, discussed the impact of demonetization on black money. And he suggested various
methods to curb the black money. He also claimed that demonetization is a political motive
decision
Dr. B.Kishore Babu and M.V.A.L. Narasimha Rao
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 162 [email protected]
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDYOBJECTIVES OF THE STBJECTIVES
OF STUDY
1. To know about civil engineering student's knowledge towards demonetization.
2. To study civil engineering student’s perception towards demonetization.
3. To find out effect of demonetization on black money.
4. To study influence of demographical profiles of civil engineering students about
demonetization.
HYPOTHESES
In the view of the objectives cited above, the following hypotheses are formulated for the
study.
HYPOTHESIS: 1
• H0: There is significant difference between male students and female students in their
perception about demonetization.
• H1:There is no significant difference between male students and female students in
their perception about demonetization
HYPOTHESIS: 2
• H0: The perception of students towards demonetization is shaped by religion.
• H1: The perception of the student about demonetization will not change by religions
of the student.
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Method: The Descriptive research method is adopted for the research.
Sampling Technique: A purposive-cum-convenient sampling method was used in
selecting participants for the research.
Sample Size: 200 from different civil engineering colleges and universities in Guntur
district, Andhra Pradesh
Targeted respondents: civil engineering students from different civil engineering colleges
of Guntur district in Andhra Pradesh.
Data collection Techniques:
Primary Data: collected from respondents through structured questionnaire and personally
interviews the respondents.
Secondary Data: internet, from the related articles, websites of different banks, RBI
websites, daily news papers
Data collection instruments: structured questionnaire
Limitation: Researcher planned to conduct the research inside the boundaries of Guntur
district of Andhra Pradesh only.
A Study on Civil Engineering Students Perception towards Demonetization in Guntur District, Andhra
Pradesh
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 163 [email protected]
DATA ANALYSIS
Table 1 Gender
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
Male 118 58.7 59.0 59.0
Female 82 40.8 41.0 100.0
Total 200 99.5 100.0
Missing System 1 .5
Total 201 100.0
Source: Field survey
Figure 1
The above diagram shows that out of 200 respondents, majority of respondents 118(59%)
are
Males followed by 82(41%) of respondents are females
Table 2 Religion
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Hindu 104 51.7 52.0 52.0
Muslim 54 26.9 27.0 79.0
Christian 30 14.9 15.0 94.0
Others 12 6.0 6.0 100.0
Total 200 99.5 100.0
Missing System 1 .5
Total 201 100.0
Source: Field survey
Dr. B.Kishore Babu and M.V.A.L. Narasimha Rao
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 164 [email protected]
Figure 2
The above diagrams shows that, in the study area majority of the respondents 104(52%) of
Respondents are belongs to Hindu religion, followed by 54(27%) respondents are Muslims,
30(15%) respondents are Christians, and 12(6%) respondents are belongs to other religions.
Table 3 Nationality
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Indian 180 89.6 90.0 90.0
Foreigner 20 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total 200 99.5 100.0
Missing System 1 .5
Total 201 100.0
Source: Field survey
Figure 3
The above diagram shows that out of 200 respondents, majority of respondents 180(90%)
are
Indians followed by 20(10%) of respondents are foreigners
A Study on Civil Engineering Students Perception towards Demonetization in Guntur District, Andhra
Pradesh
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 165 [email protected]
Table 4 Educational qualifications
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Final year 144 72 72.0 72.0
III YEAR 34 17 17.0 89.0
II YEAR.D 16 8 8 97.0
I YEAR 6 3.0 3.0 100.0
Total 200 99.5 100.0
Missing System 1 .5
Total 201 100.0
Source: Field survey
The above diagrams shows that, in the study area majority of the respondents 144(72%) of
Respondents are studying final year of civil engineering, followed by 34(17%)
respondents are iii year of civil engineering, 16(8%) respondents are ii year, and 6(3%)
respondents are doing I YEAR.
Table 5 Perception on Demonetization
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Good 114 56.7 57.0 57.0
Good but badly
implemented 80 39.8 40.0 97.0
Bad 6 3.0 3.0 100.0
Total 200 99.5 100.0
Missing System 1 .5
Total 201 100.0
Source: Field survey
Figure 4
The above diagrams shows that, in the study area majority of the respondents 114(57%) of
respondents are expressed that demonetization is good, followed by 80(40%) respondents are
expressed that demonetization is good but badly implemented, 6(3%) respondents are
expressed that demonetization is bad.
Dr. B.Kishore Babu and M.V.A.L. Narasimha Rao
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 166 [email protected]
Table 6 Curtail Black Money
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 83 41.3 41.5 41.5
agree 68 33.8 34.0 75.5
Neither agree nor
disagree 40 19.9 20.0 95.5
disagree 8 4.0 4.0 99.5
strongly disagree 1 .5 .5 100.0
Total 200 99.5 100.0
Missing System 1 .5
Total 201 100.0
Source: Field survey
Figure 5
The above diagrams shows that, in the study area majority of the respondents 83(41%) of
respondents are strongly agree that demonetization curtails corruption followed by 68(34%)
respondents are agree that demonetization curtails black money, 40(20%) are neither agree
nor disagree, 8(4%) are disagree and 1(1%) are strongly disagree that demonetization curtails
black money.
Table 7 Reduce Terrorism
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly agree 58 28.9 29.0 29.0
agree 77 38.3 38.5 67.5
Neither agree nor
disagree 46 22.9 23.0 90.5
disagree 17 8.5 8.5 99.0
strongly disagree 2 1.0 1.0 100.0
Total 200 99.5 100.0
Missing System 1 .5
Total 201 100.0
Source: Field survey
A Study on Civil Engineering Students Perception towards Demonetization in Guntur District, Andhra
Pradesh
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 167 [email protected]
Figure 6
The above diagrams shows that, in the study area majority of the respondents 77(38%) of
respondents are agree that demonetization reduces terrorism followed by 58(29%)
respondents are strongly agree that demonetization reduces terrorism, 46(23%) are neither
agree nor disagree, 17(9%) are disagree and 2(1%) are strongly disagree that demonetization
reduces terrorism
Table 8 Curtail corruption
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly agree 50 24.9 25.0 25.0
agree 68 33.8 34.0 59.0
Neither agree
nor disagree 47 23.4 23.5 82.5
disagree 35 17.4 17.5 100.0
Total 200 99.5 100.0
Missing System 1 .5
Total 201 100.0
Source: Field survey
Figure 7
The above diagrams shows that, in the study area majority of the respondents 68(34%) of
respondents are agree that demonetization reduces corruption followed by 50(25%)
respondents are strongly agree that demonetization reduces corruption, 47(23.5%) are neither
agree nor disagree, 35(17.5%) are that demonetization reduces corruption.
Dr. B.Kishore Babu and M.V.A.L. Narasimha Rao
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 168 [email protected]
Table 9 Reduce poverty
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly agree 47 23.4 23.5 23.5
agree 59 29.4 29.5 53.0
Neither agree nor
disagree 55 27.4 27.5 80.5
disagree 38 18.9 19.0 99.5
strongly disagree 1 .5 .5 100.0
Total 200 99.5 100.0
Missing System 1 .5
Total 201 100.0
Source: Field survey
Figure 8
The above diagrams shows that, in the study area majority of the respondents 59(29%) of
respondents are agree that demonetization reduces poverty followed by 55(28%) respondents
are neither agree nor disagree that demonetization reduces poverty, 47(23%) are agree,
38(19%) are disagree and 1(1%) are strongly disagree that demonetization reduces poverty.
Table 10 Cashless Society and Digital India
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly agree 50 24.9 25.0 25.0
agree 96 47.8 48.0 73.0
Neither agree nor
disagree 42 20.9 21.0 94.0
disagree 10 5.0 5.0 99.0
strongly disagree 2 1.0 1.0 100.0
Total 200 99.5 100.0
Missing System 1 .5
Total 201 100.0
Source: Field survey
A Study on Civil Engineering Students Perception towards Demonetization in Guntur District, Andhra
Pradesh
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 169 [email protected]
Figure 9
The above diagrams shows that, in the study area majority of the respondents 96(48%) of
respondents are agree that demonetization enhances cashless society followed by 50(25%)
respondents are strongly agree that demonetization enhances cashless society, 42(21%) are
neither agree nor disagree, 10(5%) are disagree and 2(1%) are strongly disagree that
demonetization enhances cashless society.
Table 11 Seriously Affected
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Rich 40 19.9 20.0 20.0
Middle class 6 3.0 3.0 23.0
Poor 124 61.7 62.0 85.0
Rich and Poor 30 14.9 15.0 100.0
Total 200 99.5 100.0
Missing System 1 .5
Total 201 100.0
Source: Field survey
Figure 10
The above diagrams shows that, in the study area majority of the respondents 124(62%) of
respondents are expresses that demonetization seriously effects poor people followed by
40(20%) respondents are expressed that demonetization effects rich people, 30(15%) are said
that demonetization is affects on both rich and poor, 6(3%) are expressed that demonetization
effects middle class people.
Dr. B.Kishore Babu and M.V.A.L. Narasimha Rao
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 170 [email protected]
Table 12 Politically Motivated
Frequency Percent Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly agree 41 20.4 20.5 20.5
agree 7 3.5 3.5 24.0
Neither agree nor disagree 55 27.4 27.5 51.5
disagree 49 24.4 24.5 76.0
strongly disagree 48 23.9 24.0 100.0
Total 200 99.5 100.0
Missin
g System 1 .5
Total 201 100.0
Figure 11
The above diagrams shows that, in the study area majority of the respondents 55(28%) of
respondents are neither agree nor disagree that demonetization is politically motivated step
taken by Central Government followed by 49(25%) respondents are strongly disagree that
demonetization is politically motivated step, 48(24%) are strongly disagree that
demonetization is politically motivated step, 41(20%) are strongly agreed that demonetization
is politically motivated step, 7(3%)respondents are agree that demonetization is politically
motivated step.
Table 13 Lost a Good Carrier
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
strongly agree 27 13.4 13.5 13.5
agree 52 25.9 26.0 39.5
Neither agree nor
disagree 81 40.3 40.5 80.0
disagree 7 3.5 3.5 83.5
strongly disagree 33 16.4 16.5 100.0
Total 200 99.5 100.0
Missing System 1 .5
Total 201 100.0
A Study on Civil Engineering Students Perception towards Demonetization in Guntur District, Andhra
Pradesh
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 171 [email protected]
Figure 12
The above diagrams shows that, in the study area majority of the respondents 81(40%) of
respondents are neither agree nor disagree that they lost a good carrier because of
demonetization followed by 52(26%) respondents are agree that respondents lost a good
carrier because of demonetization, 33(17%) are strongly disagree, 27(13%) are strongly agree,
7(4%) respondents are disagree that they lost a carrier due to demonetization.
Table 14 Hypothesis Testing Religion Vs Perception on Demonetization
Perception on Demonetization
Total Good bad
good but bad
implemented
religion
Hindu 74 28 2 104
Muslim 23 27 4 54
Christian 12 18 0 30
Others 5 7 0 12
Total 114 80 6 200
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 22.601a 6 .001
Likelihood Ratio 22.999 6 .001
Linear-by-Linear Association 10.069 1 .002
N of Valid Cases 200
a. 5 cells (41.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .36.
Symmetric Measures
Value Asymp. Std.
Errora
Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .225 .065 3.248 .001c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .276 .067 4.048 .000c
N of Valid Cases 200
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
Null hypothesis is accepted.
Dr. B.Kishore Babu and M.V.A.L. Narasimha Rao
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 172 [email protected]
Table 15 Gender Vs Politically Motivated
Politically Motivated
Total strongly agree agree
Neither agree
nor disagree disagree
strongly
disagree
gender male 24 28 29 6 31 118
female 17 21 26 1 17 82
Total 41 49 55 7 48 200
Chi-Square Tests
Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.652a 4 .455
Likelihood Ratio 3.958 4 .412
Linear-by-Linear Association .732 1 .392
N of Valid Cases 200
a. 2 cells (20.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.87.
Symmetric Measures
Value Asymp. Std.
Errora
Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.061 .070 -.855 .394c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.051 .070 -.717 .474c
N of Valid Cases 200
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
Alternative hypothesis is accepted.
4. FINDINGS
• Out of 200 respondents, majority of respondents 118(59%) are Males followed by
82(41%) of respondents are females
• Majority of the respondents 104(52%) are belongs to Hindu religion, followed by
54(27%) respondents are Muslims, 30(15%) respondents are Christians, and 12(6%)
respondents are belongs to other religions.
• Majority of respondents 180(90%) are Indians followed by 20(10%) of respondents
are foreigners
• Majority of the respondents 144(72%) are studying iv year. civil engineering,
followed by 34(17%) respondents are iii civil engineering, 16(8%) respondents are ii
year and 6(3%) respondents are pursuing i year.
• Majority of the respondents 114(57%) are expressed that demonetization is good,
followed by 80(40%) respondents are expressed that demonetization is good but badly
implemented, 6(3%) respondents are expressed that demonetization is bad.
• Majority of the respondents 83(41%) are strongly agree that demonetization curtails
corruption followed by 68(34%) respondents are agree that demonetization curtails
black money, 40(20%) are neither agree nor disagree, 8(4%) are disagree and 1(1%)
are strongly disagree that demonetization curtails black money.
A Study on Civil Engineering Students Perception towards Demonetization in Guntur District, Andhra
Pradesh
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 173 [email protected]
• Majority of the respondents 68(34%) are agree that demonetization reduces corruption
followed by 50(25%) respondents are strongly agree that demonetization reduces
corruption, 47(23.5%) are neither agree nor disagree, 35(17.5%) are that
demonetization reduces corruption.
• Majority of the respondents 59(29%) are agree that demonetization reduces poverty
followed by 55(28%) respondents are neither agree nor disagree that demonetization
reduces poverty, 47(23%) are agree, 38(19%) are disagree and 1(1%) are strongly
disagree that demonetization reduces poverty
• Majority of the respondents 96(48%) are agree that demonetization enhances cashless
society followed by 50(25%) respondents are strongly agree that demonetization
enhances cashless society, 42(21%) are neither agree nor disagree, 10(5%) are
disagree and 2(1%) are strongly disagree that demonetization enhances cashless
society
• Majority of the respondents 124(62%) are expresses that demonetization seriously
effects poor people followed by 40(20%) respondents are expressed that
demonetization effects rich people, 30(15%) are said that demonetization is affects on
both rich and poor, 6(3%) are expressed that demonetization effects middle class
people.
• Majority of the respondents 83(41%) of respondents are strongly agree that
demonetization curtails corruption followed by 68(34%) respondents are agree that
demonetization curtails black money, 40(20%) are neither agree nor disagree, 8(4%)
are disagree and 1(1%) are strongly disagree that demonetization curtails black
money.
• Majority of the respondents 55(28%) are neither agree nor disagree that
demonetization is politically motivated step taken by Central Government followed by
49(25%) respondents are strongly disagree that demonetization is politically motivated
step, 48(24%) are strongly disagree that demonetization is politically motivated step,
41(20%) are strongly agreed that demonetization is politically motivated step, 7(3%)
respondents are agree that demonetization is politically motivated step.
• Majority of the respondents 81(40%) are neither agree nor disagree that they lost a
good carrier because of demonetization followed by 52(26%) respondents are agree
that respondents lost a good carrier because of demonetization, 33(17%) are strongly
disagree, 27(13%) are strongly agree, 7(4%) respondents are disagree that they lost a
carrier due to demonetization.
5. CONCLUSION
The success or failure of any Government policy depends on the support of citizen of country
people includes students, farmers, business men and govt. and private employees of the
society. Students support is very much required for the success or failure of policy. The
support comes from perception of the students towards policy. If the students have positive
perceptions towards policy, whatever the consequences they have to face, they face positively
and encourage others to support policy by educating the people and promote the citizen to
implement the policies of central government. Civil engineering students who are technically
sound about the drugs at the same time they are having knowledge about social changes that
are taking place in and around the society. Majority of the civil engineering students are
aware about merits and demerits of demonetization, consequences and objectives of
demonetization. So Government has to publicize the merits and positive consequences of
demonetization and how it will useful for the development of country
Dr. B.Kishore Babu and M.V.A.L. Narasimha Rao
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 174 [email protected]
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors wish to thank all the CIVIL ENGINEERING students who voluntarily
participated in the study. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in
the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
REFERENCES
[1] http://www.civilserviceindia.com/current-affairs/articles/demonetization-of-currency.html
[2] https://brainly.in/question/1103193
[3] https://www.essaytopics.com/v/236010/demonetization-in-india/
[4] https://www.meritnation.com/ask-answer/q.
[5] https://law.toprankers.com/law-exams/cur.
[6] International Journal of Informative & Futuristic Research (IJIFR) Volume - 4, Issue -6,
February 2017Continuous 42nd Edition, Page No: 6477-6484ISSN: 2347-1697, people
perception towards demonetization
[7] https://www.study dhaba.com/ demonetization. Essay.pdf India/
[8] https://www.examweb.in/short-essay-article-demonetization-impact-5443
[9] http://indiaopines.com/demonetization-deserve-hype/
[10] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1902...
[11] https://targetstudy.com/colleges/pharmd-degree-colleges-in-guntur.html
[12] M. Charles Dayana, Dr. S. Nadarajan. Employees Perception on Quality of Work Life in
Micro Small and Medium Enterprises in Kanyakumari District. International Journal of
Advanced Research in Management, 8(3), 2017, pp. 08–14.
[13] S. Nava Rethna Bala Kumari, Dr. R. Rathiha, Employees Perception on Recruitment and
Selection Process in Public and Private Sector Banks. International Journal of
Management, 8 (5), 2017, pp. 44–52.
[14] Kasthuri and Dr P.Uma Rani. Customer Perceptions and Satisfaction towards Home Loan
at Public Banks of Tamilnadu, 7(2), 2016, pp. 497-501
[15] Kesari Singh and Nitin Gupta, Customer’s Perception and Satisfaction towards Services
of Public & Private Sector Banks. International Journal of Management, 7(6), 2016,
pp. 77–88.
[16] Dr. Bahtije Gerbeshi Zylfiu, Education and Cultural Heritage According To Teachers’
Perceptions of Low Secondary Schools. International Journal of Advanced Research in
Management, 7(3), 2016, pp. 48–56.