a study on the drive performance of a magnetic planetary
TRANSCRIPT
A Study on the Drive Performance of a Magnetic Planetary Gear Device with Dual-Input Functionality (Part 2)
M. Miyazawa*, H. Oizumi*, D. Kobayashi*, H. Tota*, and K. Tsurumoto** Faculty of Eng., *Dept. of EE, **ME, Tohoku Gakuin Univ., 1-13-1 Chuo, Tagajo, Miyagi 985-8537, Japan
We created and reported the performance of a variety of magnetic gears in previous work. Magnetic gears allow the transmission of
motive force in a completely non-contact state. Their main advantages include low vibration and noise, maintenance-free operation,
and a lack of lubrication. We have recently constructed a prototype of a magnetic planetary gear apparatus and found that the most
promising practical application of such a device, particularly for accelerator versions, is in wind-powered electrical power generating
equipment. This device boasts dual-input functionality. We envision wind power as the primary input, while the secondary input may
come from sources such as hydraulic power or electrical-storage devices to drive the mechanism that controls the rotation rate. We
reported the possibility of using secondary input as a differential mechanism in a previous paper published in this journal to
compensate for variations in the input rotation rate, thus allowing the rotation rate of the sun gear to be controlled, which constitutes
the output of the device. We used our dual-input device in this research to carry out experimental investigations into a parallel-drive
scheme in which the outer ring gear on the secondary input is rotated in the same direction that the carrier is rotated. Our experiments
revealed three distinct operating regimes for our device: a regime in which the output rotation rate was lower than the input rotation
rate, a point at which the output rotation rate fell to zero, and a regime in which the output rotation rate was greater than, but in the
direction opposite to, the input rotation rate.
Key words: planetary gear, sun gear, outer ring gear, dual-input functionality, drive performance, parallel-drive, differential-drive
1. Introduction
We created and reported the performance of a variety of
magnetic gear prototypes in this journal1)–4). Magnetic gears
allow the transmission of motive force between gears in a
completely non-contact state. Their main advantages include
low vibration and noise, maintenance-free operation, and a lack
of lubrication5)–9). We have recently constructed a prototype of a
magnetic planetary differential gear apparatus and found that the
most promising practical application of such a device,
particularly for accelerator versions, is in wind-powered
electrical power generating equipment. This device is capable of
sustaining a high speed-increase ratio, while boasting dual-input
functionality, we envision wind power as the primary input,
while the secondary input may come from sources such as
hydraulic power or electrical-storage devices to drive the
mechanism that controls the rotation rate. We reported the
possibility of using secondary input as a differential mechanism
in a previous paper published in this journal10) to compensate for
variations in the input rotation rate, thus allowing the rotation
rate of the sun gear to be controlled, which constitutes the
output of the device.
We describe further experimental investigations conducted
using this dual-input magnetic planetary gear device in this
report. In contrast to earlier work4), we here consider a
parallel-drive configuration in which the primary input is taken
from the planetary gear guiding disc (the carrier), while the
outer ring gear, which provides the secondary input, is rotated in
Fig. 1 Schematic of planetary and outer ring gearing for
accelerator.
(One example of differential (diff.) and parallel (para.) drive
configuration.)
the same direction that the carrier is rotated. We report below
the results of a comparative study contrasting the performance
of this parallel-drive configuration to the performance of
differential-drive configurations studied previously.
2. Design Specifications of the Magnetic Planetary
gear Device
Figure 1 shows the configuration of the magnetic planetary
178 Journal of the Magnetics Society of Japan Vol.38, No.4, 2014
J. Magn. Soc. Jpn., <Paper>38, 178-183 (2014)
Planetary gear (a)
Outer ring gear (c)
Sun gear (b)
Carrier
Input (2)
Output
Input (1)
Fig. 2 Photographs of planetary gears, sun gear, and outer ring
gear.
Table 1 Characteristics of planetary gear, sun gear, and outer
ring gear.
Nomenclature
Module : m = 20
Tooth profile : Involute curve
Height of tooth : H = 20 mm
Center distance : L = 60 mm
Planetary gear (a)
Number of teeth : ZP = 16
Radius of pitch circle : RP = 20 mm
Diameter of outer circle : DP = 80 mm
Sun gear (b)
Number of teeth : ZS = 16
Radius of pitch circle : RS = 20 mm
Diameter of outer circle : DS = 80 mm
Outer ring gear (c)
Number of teeth : ZO = 64
Radius of pitch circle : RO = 80 mm
Diameter of outer circle : DO = 200 mm
gear device, together with a skeleton diagram of its gear
intermeshing and an indication of the motive force transmission
pathway.
This device consists of planetary gears (a), a sun gear (b), and
an outer ring gear (c).
Figure 1 shows a case in which we have four planetary gears
spaced at 90° intervals. The planetary gears are arranged on a
disc supporting the planetary gear axis (the carrier). When an
input from the primary input source (1) is applied to the carrier,
the carrier revolves and the planetary gears spin. We carry out a
comparative investigation of two distinct strategies for driving
the outer ring gear, which controls the rotation rate, as a
secondary input: a parallel-drive configuration, in which the
outer ring gear is rotated in the same direction as the primary
input rotation, and a differential-drive configuration (studied in
previous work) in which the direction of rotation of the outer
ring gear is opposite to the direction of the primary input. Note
that, in both drive configurations, the motive force output is
taken from the sun gear. The example depicted in Fig. 1
contains graphical illustrations of both the parallel-drive and
differential-drive configurations. The gear teeth are NdFeB
magnets following an involute curve with their poles in an
alternating arrangement (N, S, N, S); in this structure, the
attractive interaction between the magnets is responsible for the
transmission of motive force. The gap between the planetary
gear and the sun gear is ℊ = 2 mm.
The blue-colored regions of Fig. 1 are the primary
intermeshing regions. Shown are the internal mesh zones, at
which the planetary gears and the outer ring gear intermesh, and
the external mesh zones, at which the planetary gears and the
sun gear intermesh. In these regions, the opposing magnets are
nearly parallel to one another, and these regions are responsible
for the majority of the motive force transmission. The
red-colored regions, in which the teeth appear to cross one
another, contribute little to the force transmission.
Figure 2 is a photograph of the magnetic planetary gear
device. As shown in the photograph, this device consists of
three types of gears: planetary gears, a sun gear, and an outer
ring gear.
Table 1 details the design specifications of the magnetic gears.
The magnets used are NdFeB magnets with yoke surface flux
density of 0.53 T. Involutes were chosen as the tooth form curve.
The ratio of teeth on the planetary gears, the sun gear, and the
outer ring gear is 1:1:4.
3. Equations for Calculating the Output Rotation Rate
The following equations are used to calculate the sun gear
rotation rate NS, which constitutes the output of the magnetic
planetary gear device of Fig. 3. The clockwise direction of
Fig. 3 Magnetic planetary gear, sun gear, and outer ring gear.
179Journal of the Magnetics Society of Japan Vol.38, No.4, 2014
rotation when viewing the carrier head on is taken as the
positive (+) direction, and rotations in the counter-clockwise
direction are considered negative (−). We use the following
notation:
NP, ZP: Rotation rate and number of teeth of the planetary gear
NO, ZO: Rotation rate and number of teeth of the outer ring gear
NS, ZS: Rotation rate and number of teeth of the sun gear
NC: Rotation rate of the carrier
The direction of the input carrier rotation may be either
positive or negative; here we assume it is positive.
1) Differential-drive configuration
If, in Fig. 3, the carrier rotates in the positive direction while
the outer ring gear rotates in the negative direction, the
planetary gears experience a couple moment in the negative
direction; hence, the planetary gears begin to spin in the
negative direction while simultaneously revolving in the
positive direction around the outer ring. Consequently, the sun
gear rotates in the positive direction. Denoting by ε the ratio
between the speeds of the outer ring and sun gears, we have
ε = (NS − NC)/(–NO − NC) = −ZO/ZS. (1)
Thus, from equation (1), we find Ns as
NS = NC(1 + ZO/ZS)+NO(ZO/ZS). (2)
In this case, we have ZS = 16 and ZO = 64, whereupon equation
(2) becomes
NS = 5NC + 4NO. (3)
2) Parallel-drive configuration
Next consider the case in which the carrier and the outer ring
gear both rotate in the positive direction.
a) When NC > NO, the planetary gears experience the
moment of force in the negative direction; hence, the
planetary gears spin in the negative direction while
simultaneously revolving in the positive direction. Thus,
the sun gear rotates in the positive direction, and we find
ε = (NS − NC)/−(NO − NC) = ZO/ZS. (4)
Thus, from equation (4), we find NS as
NS = 5NC − 4NO. (5)
b) When NC = NO, the two force moments acting on the
planetary gears sum to zero; hence, the planetary gears do
not spin independently, but only in their revolution in the
positive direction. The sun gear accordingly rotates in the
positive direction, and NS is given by
NS = NC. (6)
c) When NC < NO, the planetary gears experience a moment
of force in the positive direction; hence, the planetary
gears spin in the positive direction while also revolving in
the positive direction, and the sun gear consequently
rotates in the negative direction. Thus we find
ε = (NS − NC )/(NO − NC ) = −ZO/ZS. (7)
Fig. 4 Schematic of test apparatus.
From equation (7), we find NS as
NS = 5NC − 4NO. (8)
Equation (8) is identical to equation (5).
d) From equation (5), we see that in the particular case NO =
(5/4)NC we have
NS = 0. (9)
4. Test Apparatus for Observing Drive Performance
Figure 4 shows a schematic diagram of the test apparatus we
used to assess drive performance. The combined planetary
gear/outer ring gear device has an outer radius of approximately
240 mm and a width of approximately 110 mm. Based on our
experimental results thus far, the transmission efficiency of this
device is 85–90 %, and its input motive force with the planetary
gears rotating a rate of 1000 min-1 is approximately 500 W.
The primary input force is supplied from the primary axis of
an input carrier connected directly with an electric induction
motor (1) labeled in the figure; it is transmitted to the output of
the sun gear via the outer ring gear in a completely non-contact
state. The outer ring gear is driven, via a pulley from an
induction motor (2), in either the same direction or the opposite
direction of the carrier input rotation.
The magnetic planetary gear device used in this experiment
has dual-input functionality; the rotation rate NC of the carrier
which provides the primary input and the rotation rate NO of the
outer ring gear which provides another input are driven by the
induction motors (1) and (2) using V-f inverters (1) and (2),
whose frequency we vary to control rotation rates. The carrier
torque TC, the outer-ring-gear torque TO, and the sun gear torque
Ts are measured by torque meters (1), (2), and (3). The carrier
rotation rate NC, the outer ring gear rotation rate NO, and the sun
gear rotation rate NS are measured by rotation detectors installed
in the torque meters.
Since we were able to apply a load to the sun gear output axis
by using an electromagnetic brake, we tested the drive
180 Journal of the Magnetics Society of Japan Vol.38, No.4, 2014
Fig. 5 Relationship between outer ring gear speed NO and NS /NC.
(NS : sun gear speed, NC : carrier speed.)
performance under loaded conditions. We define the maximal
output torque Tsmax to be the torque obtained for the load at
which the sun gear just begins to slip or idle when under excess
loading.
5. Results and Discussion of Drive Performance
Experiments
We conducted a variety of experiments using the drive
performance test apparatus of Fig. 4.
5.1 Steady-state performance
Figure 5 plots the ratio of the output rotation rate to the
primary-input rotation rate (Ns/Nc), for the case in which the
electromagnetic brake is not applied (unloaded state), for carrier
rotation rates held constant at NC = ±200 min-1, NC = ±300 min-1,
and NC = ±400 min-1, as the rotation rate of the outer ring gear is
varied from NO = −500 min-1 to +500 min-1 in steps of 50 min-1.
In this plot, the signs of the quantities NC and NO, and the sign
of the horizontal axis (the NO axis) each represent the direction
of rotation and are defined such that positive values indicate
clockwise, while negative values indicate counter-clockwise.
As is clear from Fig. 5, the drive apparatus allows four
distinct quadrants of control operation. The value of 5 on the
vertical axis corresponds to the value of Ns/Nc at which
equation (3) predicts NO = 0, and the horizontal dashed line
through this value in the figure is the boundary between the
differential-drive and parallel-drive areas; the gray shaded
region above this line is the differential-drive area, while the
unshaded portion below the dashed line is the parallel-drive area.
Equations (3), (5), (6), (8), and (9), which calculate the output
rotation rates when the carrier is rotated in the positive direction,
yield the curves plotted in Fig. 5 in the differential-drive area of
the 2nd quadrant and the parallel-drive area of the 1st and 4 th
Fig. 6 Relationship between sun gear torque Ts and carrier
torque TC.
Fig. 7 Relationship between sun gear torque TS and outer ring
gear torque To.
quadrants. Our experiments allowed us to verify the validity of
these equations. Equations for the case in which the carrier is
rotated in the negative (counter-clockwise) direction may be
found in the same way by calculating counterclockwise as
positive; a graph of the output rotation rates thus computed
would have the differential-drive area in the 1st quadrant and the
parallel-drive area in the 2nd and 3rd quadrants. The
characteristic features of Fig. 5 remain unchanged when a load
is applied by the electromagnetic brake.
Note that, in the differential-drive configuration, the output
rotation rate always corresponds to a region of increase in speed,
whereas the parallel-drive configuration exhibits three distinct
dynamical regimes: one in which the speed decreases, one in which
the motion comes to a halt, and one in which the motion reverses
direction and increases in speed.
As particular examples, Figs. 6–9 plot the results of
experiments of drive performance in the parallel-drive
configuration (and, for comparison, in the differential-drive
configuration) with both the carrier rotation rate NC and the
outer ring rotation rate NO held constant. In our experiments,
loading via electromagnetic brake was applied to vary the sun
gear torque Ts from 0 to the maximum output torque Tsmax in
181Journal of the Magnetics Society of Japan Vol.38, No.4, 2014
Fig. 8 Relationship between sun gear torque Ts and carrier
torque Tc.
Fig. 9 Relationship between sun gear torque TS and outer ring
gear torque To.
steps of 0.1 Nm. The value of Tsmax was approximately 0.8 Nm
in all the experiments we conducted. The labels “para.” and
“diff.” in the figures indicate the parallel-drive and
differential-drive configurations.
For a fixed carrier rotation rate of NC = +200 min-1, the
characteristics of carrier torque TC and the outer ring torque TO
are plotted in Figs. 6 and 7 for the cases of a parallel-drive
configuration with NO = +200 min-1 (in which case, we have NS
= +200 min-1) and a differential-drive configuration with NO =
–200 min-1 (in which case, we have NS = +1800 min-1),
respectively. Positive (negative) torques on the horizontal and
vertical axes correspond to clockwise (counter-clockwise)
direction of rotation. Figures 6 and 7 indicate that, in both the
parallel-drive and differential-drive configurations, TC and TO
increase linearly in proportion with Ts. In the parallel-drive case,
the planetary gears rotate only with their revolution but do not
spin independently. In the differential-drive case, the couple acts
on the planetary gears from the carrier gear side and from the
outer ring gear side, so we have NS = +1800 min-1, a high
rotation rate compared to the NS = +200 min-1 obtained in the
parallel-drive case. The torque is larger in the differential-drive
case.
Similarly, Figs. 8 and 9 plot TC and TO for the cases of a
parallel-drive configuration with NO = +300 min-1 (in which case,
we have NS = −200 min-1) and a differential-drive configuration
with NO = −300 min-1 (in which case we have NS = +2200 min-1)
respectively; again, the carrier rotation rate is fixed at NC = +200
min-1. As above, positive (negative) torques on the horizontal
and vertical axes correspond to clockwise (counter-clockwise)
direction of rotation. In the parallel-drive case, because we have
NC < NO, the planetary gears experience a force moment from
the outer ring gear side, and hence spin in the clockwise
direction while revolving in the clockwise direction. In the
differential-drive case we find a high-speed rotation in the
positive direction with NS = +2200 min-1, as in the case for NO =
−200 min-1. In both the parallel-drive and differential-drive
configurations, TC and TO increase linearly in proportion with
Ts; there is little difference between the torques in the two cases.
5.2 Transient performance
In the parallel-drive area, there are points at which the
direction of the sun gear’s rotation (the output of the device)
changes from positive to negative, or points at which the
direction changes from negative to positive. These are the
boundary between quadrants 1 and 4, and on the boundary
between quadrants 2 and 3, in Fig. 5. Here we investigate the
transient phenomenon of reversal at the boundary separating
quadrants 1 and 4. As an example, at a carrier rotation rate of NC
= +200 min-1 and an outer ring gear rotation rate of NO = +250
min-1, equation (9) predicts that the rotation rate of the sun gear
will be NS = 0 (point a in Fig. 5). Figure 10 plots the transient
response as the outer ring gear rotation rate is varied from NO =
+200 min-1 to +300 min-1 at a sun gear torque of Ts = +0.5 Nm.
Before the variation begins, we have the parameter values NC =
Fig. 10 Waveforms of transient phenomena when changing NO
from +200 min-1 to +300 min-1.
182 Journal of the Magnetics Society of Japan Vol.38, No.4, 2014
+200 min-1, TC = +2.4 Nm, NO = +200 min-1, TO = −1.3 Nm, and
Ns = +200 min-1. After the system stabilizes, we have rotation
rates NC = +200 min-1, NO = +300 min-1, and Ns = –200 min-1
and corresponding torques of TC = −2.5 Nm, TO = +2.8 Nm, and
Ts = −0.5 Nm, respectively. As is clear from a glance at the
waveforms of the transient phenomena, the direction of the
output rotation changes; this is also readily observable by visual
inspection. However, with respect to the Ns waveform after
stabilization, the torque meter we used in this case (TS-3200A,
Ono Sokki) can only output a DC voltage for either positive
output torques or negative rotation rate outputs, but not both (its
full scale is 0.0 to ±10.0V), and hence in the plot we have
separately drawn the other output using a dashed line. The time
required for the output to stabilize was approximately 2.37
seconds.
The direction of the sun gear’s rotation similarly reverses on
the boundary between quadrants 2 and 3. For example, at point
b in Fig. 5, we have NC = −200 min-1 and NO = −250 min-1,
whereupon it follows that NS = 0. We thus confirmed that the
direction of the sun gear’s rotation indeed reverses as NO is
varied around this point; we omit the details here.
Figure 11 examines, with respect to the width of the NO
variation, the time needed for Ns to stabilize after reversing sign.
As a specific example, at the value NC = +200 min-1, we have NS
= 0 at NO = +250 min-1, and so we examine the time required for
stabilization using the horizontal axis to indicate the width of
the variation in NO (centered at NO = +250 min-1), as a
percentage change to 250 min-1. (Note that Fig. 10 corresponds
to the case of 0.4% percentage variation width in NO). In Fig. 11,
transitions from positive to negative direction of rotation are
labeled “Ns (+)→Ns (−)”, while transitions from negative to
positive rotation are labeled “Ns (−) → Ns (+)”. We learned that
the time required for the output to stabilize is approximately the
same regardless of the direction of the transition and increases
in proportion to the width of the NO variation.
Fig. 11 Relationship between percentage variation width of No
and transition duration.
6. Conclusions
In this paper, we conducted experimental investigations into
the drive performance, focusing primarily on a parallel-drive
configuration, of a magnetic planetary gear device equipped
with dual-input functionality. Upon comparison to previously
reported investigations into drive performance in a
differential-drive configuration4), the following characteristics
were revealed.
(1) The parallel-drive configuration exhibits three distinct
operating regimes: a regime in which the output rotation
rate is lower than the input rotation rate, a point at which
the output rotation rate falls to zero, and a regime in which
the output rotation is rate greater than, but in the direction
opposite to, the input rotation rate. Therefore, it is
considered that the device is suitable for an application of
drive system to a robot arm or a mechanical tool having
reversible motion, etc. In contrast, in the differential-drive
configuration the device only operates as an accelerator
device; however, it is capable of producing a high output
rotation rate.
(2) In both the parallel and differential drive configurations,
the torque at the two inputs increases in proportion to the
output torque.
(3) In the parallel-drive case, we discovered that controlling
the secondary input can cause the direction of the output
rotations to reverse. The time required for the rotation to
stabilize after such a reversal increases in proportion to the
width of the variation in the secondary input.
References
1) K. Tsurumoto, Y. Tanaka, and A. Kumagai: J. Magn. Soc. Jpn., 25, 1179
(2001).
2) K. Tsurumoto and Y. Tanaka: J. Magn. Soc. Jpn., 26, 703(2002).
3) K. Tsurumoto, J. Komatsu, K. Kuritani, and D. Goto: J. Magn. Soc. Jpn.,
29, 316(2005).
4) M. Haneda and K. Tsurumoto: J. Magn. Soc. Jpn., 31, 135(2007).
5) D. E. Hesmondhalgh and D. Tipping: IEE Proc. Elect. Power Appl. , 127,
129(1980).
6) K. Tsurumoto and S. Kikushi: IEEE Trans. Magn., 23, 3622(1987).
7) K. Ikuta, S. Makita, and S. Arimoto: Proc. IEEE Conf. on Micro
electromechanical systems (MEMS ‘91), 125(1991).
8) S. Kikushi and K. Tsurumoto: IEEE Trans. Magn., 30, 4767(1994).
9) T. Ikeda, K. Nakamura, and O. Ichinokura: J. Magn. Soc. Jpn., 33, 130
(2009).
10) T. Togashi, Y. Ota, M. Miyazawa, O. Saito, and K. Tsurumoto: J. Magn.
Soc. Jpn., 36, 263(2012).
Received Dec. 2, 2013; Revised Feb. 27, 2014; Accepted Apr.
10, 2014
183Journal of the Magnetics Society of Japan Vol.38, No.4, 2014