a t y lui, d. g. sibeck, t. phan, v. angelopoulos, k.-h. glassmeier, j. mcfadden, c. carlson, d....

10
A T Y Lui, D. G. Sibeck, T. Phan, V. Angelopoulos, K.-H. Glassmeier, J. McFadden, C. Carlson, D. Larson, J. Bonnell, + … Outline Previous: Reconstruction based on solving Grad-Shafranov equation Benchmarking of procedure Results of reconstruction for magnetic flux rope seen by Themis. Present: Reconstruction of plasma configuration from Themis observations Progress Report

Upload: grace-tucker

Post on 01-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A T Y Lui, D. G. Sibeck, T. Phan, V. Angelopoulos, K.-H. Glassmeier, J. McFadden, C. Carlson, D. Larson, J. Bonnell, + … Outline  Previous: Reconstruction

A T Y Lui, D. G. Sibeck, T. Phan, V. Angelopoulos, K.-H. Glassmeier, J. McFadden, C. Carlson, D. Larson, J. Bonnell, + …

Outline Previous:

Reconstruction based on solving Grad-Shafranov equation

Benchmarking of procedure

Results of reconstruction for magnetic flux rope seen by Themis. Present:

Comparison between model and observed parameters

Current density and structure from each Themis satellite.

Reconstruction of plasma configurationfrom Themis observations

Progress Report

Page 2: A T Y Lui, D. G. Sibeck, T. Phan, V. Angelopoulos, K.-H. Glassmeier, J. McFadden, C. Carlson, D. Larson, J. Bonnell, + … Outline  Previous: Reconstruction

Magnetic flux rope on 2007 May 20 found by David Sibeck

The plasma structures seen by Themis A and E are quite similar.

Observed Structure from Themis S/C10

-1

100

101

-200

-100

0

100

300

200

100

0

-100200

100

0

20

10

-10

0

10

20

0

-2020

10

0

-10

21:50 21:55 22:00 22:05 22:10 22:15 22:20

2007 May 20 THEMIS-A/ESA/FGM

UTXgsm (R E)Ygsm (R E)Zgsm (R E)

-7.5 10.6 6.3

-7.7 10.4 6.2

10-1

100

-200

-100

0

100

200

0

200

100

0

-100

30

20

10

020

10

0

-10

-20

-10

0

10

20

10

0

21:50 21:55 22:00 22:05 22:10 22:15 22:20

2007 May 20 THEMIS-B/ESA/FGM

UTXgsm (R E)Ygsm (R E)Zgsm (R E)

-8.1 9.7 5.6

-8.1 9.5 5.4

10-1

100

101

-200

-100

0

100

200

0

200

100

0

-10040

30

20

1020

10

0

-10

-20

0

20

20

10

0

-10

21:50 21:55 22:00 22:05 22:10 22:15 22:20

2007 May 20 THEMIS-C/ESA/FGM

UTXgsm (R E)Ygsm (R E)Zgsm (R E)

-8.1 9.8 5.6

-8.2 9.6 5.5

10-1

100

-200

0

200

300

200

100

0

200

0

40

20

-20

0

-20

-10

0

10

40

20

0

21:50 21:55 22:00 22:05 22:10 22:15 22:20

2007 May 20 THEMIS-D/ESA/FGM

UTXgsm (R E)Ygsm (R E)Zgsm (R E)

-7.9 10.1 5.8

-8 9.8 5.7

10-1

100

101

-200

-100

0

100

200

100

0

200

100

0

-10030

20

10

-20

-10

0

10

20

10

0

-10

-2020

10

0

-10

21:50 21:55 22:00 22:05 22:10 22:15 22:20

2007 May 20 THEMIS-E/ESA/FGM

UTXgsm (R E)Ygsm (R E)Zgsm (R E)

-7.7 10.5 6.2

-7.8 10.3 6

A B C

D E

Page 3: A T Y Lui, D. G. Sibeck, T. Phan, V. Angelopoulos, K.-H. Glassmeier, J. McFadden, C. Carlson, D. Larson, J. Bonnell, + … Outline  Previous: Reconstruction

Magnetic Field Strength ContoursFrom David Sibeck

10 nT contours

Red high,

Blue low

13.0

12.5

12.0

11.5

11.0

10.5

10.0

8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0

X (RE)

Magnetosphere

Magnetosheath

30 nT

20 nT

13.0

12.5

12.0

11.5

11.0

10.5

10.0

8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0

X (RE)

A

E

D

C

B

Bx, By

Page 4: A T Y Lui, D. G. Sibeck, T. Phan, V. Angelopoulos, K.-H. Glassmeier, J. McFadden, C. Carlson, D. Larson, J. Bonnell, + … Outline  Previous: Reconstruction

Vector Potential

Themis B

Themis C

Themis D

Themis E

-500

0

500

22:00 22:01 22:02 22:03 22:04 22:05 22:06

2007 May 20 THEMIS B A1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

-500

0

500

22:00 22:01 22:02 22:03 22:04 22:05 22:06

2007 May 20 THEMIS C A1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

-500

0

500

22:00 22:01 22:02 22:03 22:04 22:05 22:06

2007 May 20 THEMIS D A

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

-500

0

500

22:00 22:01 22:02 22:03 22:04 22:05 22:06

2007 May 20 THEMIS E A

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

Page 5: A T Y Lui, D. G. Sibeck, T. Phan, V. Angelopoulos, K.-H. Glassmeier, J. McFadden, C. Carlson, D. Larson, J. Bonnell, + … Outline  Previous: Reconstruction

Comparison of plasma parameters between the model and observed values along the satellite track - red lines denote model values and black lines denote observed values.

Comparison of Plasma Parameters-1

30

25

20

15

22:00 22:01 22:02 22:03 22:04 22:05

-20

-15

-10

-5

20

16

12

8

2007 May 20 Themis BObservedModel

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

30

25

20

15

10

22:00 22:01 22:02 22:03 22:04 22:05

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

15

10

5

0

2007 May 20 Themis C ObservedModel

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

40

20

0

22:00 22:01 22:02 22:03 22:04 22:05

10

0

-10

-30

-20

-10

0

10

2007 May 20 Themis D ObservedModel

1.2

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

-20

-15

-10

-5

22:00 22:01 22:02 22:03 22:04 22:05

20

15

10

5

-20

-15

-10

-5

2007 May 20 Themis E ObservedModel

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

Themis B Themis C Themis D Themis E

Page 6: A T Y Lui, D. G. Sibeck, T. Phan, V. Angelopoulos, K.-H. Glassmeier, J. McFadden, C. Carlson, D. Larson, J. Bonnell, + … Outline  Previous: Reconstruction

Quantitative comparison of magnetic field components between the model and observed values along the satellite track - black, red, and blue symbols denote x-, y-, and z-components, respectively.

The extremely good agreement is reflected by the correlation coefficients between observed and model values ranging from 0.9978 to 0.9998.

Comparison of Plasma Parameters-2

Themis B Themis C Themis D Themis E

-40

-20

0

20

40

-40 -20 0 20 40

Observed B Components (nT)

cc = 0.9998

Bx By Bz Curve Fit

2007 May 20 Themis B

-40

-20

0

20

40

-40 -20 0 20 40

Observed B Components (nT)

cc = 0.9996

Bx By Bz Curve Fit

2007 May 20 Themis C

-40

-20

0

20

40

-40 -20 0 20 40

Observed B Components (nT)

cc = 0.9978

Bx By Bz Curve Fit

2007 May 20 Themis D

-40

-20

0

20

40

-40 -20 0 20 40

Observed B Components (nT)

cc = 0.9988

Bx By Bz Curve Fit

2007 May 20 Themis E

Page 7: A T Y Lui, D. G. Sibeck, T. Phan, V. Angelopoulos, K.-H. Glassmeier, J. McFadden, C. Carlson, D. Larson, J. Bonnell, + … Outline  Previous: Reconstruction

Themis D

Parameters From Reconstruction - 1The current density is derived from curl B calculation using the 2D approximation:

The normalized magnetic field vector along the satellite track on the XY-plane is shown by the arrow in the Bz panel.

∂ /∂z <<∂ /∂x,∂ /∂y-500

0

500

40

20

0

-20-500

0

500

-500

0

500

0.6

0.4

0.2

-500

0

500

-500

0

500

-40

-20

0

20

40

-500

0

500

-500

0

500

-500

0

500

22:01:30 22:01:45 22:02:00 22:02:15 22:02:30 22:02:45 22:03:00

2007 May 20 THEMIS D

B (nT)

J (nA/m2)

P (nPa)

Bx

By

Bz

Jx

Jy

Jz

Pt

Pr

Page 8: A T Y Lui, D. G. Sibeck, T. Phan, V. Angelopoulos, K.-H. Glassmeier, J. McFadden, C. Carlson, D. Larson, J. Bonnell, + … Outline  Previous: Reconstruction

Themis C

Parameters From Reconstruction - 2

A stronger Bz region is located in the positive y-direction.Current density in the y-direction is quite strong, comparable to that along the z-direction.

-500

0

500

20

0-500

0

500

-500

0

500

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

-500

0

500

-500

0

500

10

0

-10-500

0

500

-500

0

500

-500

0

500

22:01:30 22:01:45 22:02:00 22:02:15 22:02:30 22:02:45 22:03:00

2007 May 20 THEMIS C

B (nT)

J (nA/m2)

P (nPa)

Bx

By

Bz

Jx

Jy

Jz

Pt

Pr

Page 9: A T Y Lui, D. G. Sibeck, T. Phan, V. Angelopoulos, K.-H. Glassmeier, J. McFadden, C. Carlson, D. Larson, J. Bonnell, + … Outline  Previous: Reconstruction

Themis B

Parameters From Reconstruction - 3

Strong and weak Bz regions are present in the positive y-direction. Weak Bz region is located in the negative y-direction.Current densities on the XY-plane are quite strong in comparison with that in the z-direction.

-500

0

500

20

0

-20-500

0

500

-500

0

500

0.6

0.4

0.2

-500

0

500

-500

0

500

-20

0

20

-500

0

500

-500

0

500

-500

0

500

22:01:30 22:01:45 22:02:00 22:02:15 22:02:30 22:02:45 22:03:00

2007 May 20 THEMIS B

B (nT)

J (nA/m2)

P (nPa)

Bx

By

Bz

Jx

Jy

Jz

Pt

Pr

Page 10: A T Y Lui, D. G. Sibeck, T. Phan, V. Angelopoulos, K.-H. Glassmeier, J. McFadden, C. Carlson, D. Larson, J. Bonnell, + … Outline  Previous: Reconstruction

Themis E

Parameters From Reconstruction - 4

Magnetic field and current density patterns are quite structured in general because Themis E was mainly in the magnetosheath region.

-500

0

500

20

0

-20

-500

0

500

-500

0

500

0.4

0.2

-500

0

500

-500

0

500

10

0

-10-500

0

500

-500

0

500

-500

0

500

22:01:30 22:01:45 22:02:00 22:02:15 22:02:30 22:02:45 22:03:00

2007 May 20 THEMIS E

B (nT)

J (nA/m2)

P (nPa)

Bx

By

Bz

Jx

Jy

Jz

Pt

Pr